Quote:

TWO Muslims have refused to stand for a District Court judge, with one claiming they are not “at the behest of any authority other than Islam”.    Under NSW law an accused is required to stand to hear the charge against them and respond with a plea of guilty or not guilty. Wassim Fayad and co-accused Milad Bin Ahmad-Shah Al-Ahmadzai both defied the law yesterday and remained seated during their arraignments on an aggravated break and enter charge in Parramatta District Court. Fayad initially refused to stand for Judge Andrew Colefax in the morning but elected to stand in the afternoon and plead not guilty to one charge of aggravated break and enter and attempting to pervert the course of justice. Al-Ahmadzai, 24, has now been referred to NSW Attorney-General Brad Hazzard after refusing to stand for Judge Colefax three times during his proceedings. The judge adjourned the case for several hours while considering referring Al-Ahmadzai and Fayad for contempt of court charges. When Al-Ahmadzai refused to stand for a second time, telling Judge Colefax “no thank you’’, Fayad said from the dock “he has a bit of a sore leg’’. But Al-Ahmadzai's lawyer Arjun Chhabra told the court his client’s decision stemmed from a “philosophical and theological belief’’. “He has a far stricter view (than other followers of Islam),’’ Mr Chhabra said. “There are a number of prescriptions (of the faith) ... that one isn’t at the behest of any authority other than that of Islam ... and Allah. “At first it may appear disrespectful (but) it is not intended to bring the administration or efficiency of the court to a halt, or its dignity into disrepute.’’ Prosecutor Craig Everson said the conduct was like “putting a finger up to the court’’. Judge Colefax said, while he considered the behaviour to be “clear contempt’’, he would refer it to the Attorney-General’s office, along with a transcript of the interaction. The pair laughed and talked to each other while Judge Colefax addressed the court. He asked him for the third and final time to stand, to which Al-Ahmadzai replied: “No.’’ He then pleaded not guilty to one charge of aggravated break and enter, allegedly committed alongside Fayad and an unidentified man, at Macquarie shopping centre in North Ryde on October 15 last year. The pair were refused bail yesterday and both men ordered to stand trial in the Parramatta District Court from September 7 next year. Originally published as Muslims’ refusal to stand ‘a slur on court’

http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/muslim-duos-refusal-to-stand-is-a-slur-on-court/story-fnii5s3x-1227137565328

deport them.
deport all their families

Wassim Fayad was in prison for beating a man to get him to pay a debt and the other guy should've only been eligible for parole 9 days ago for threatening to kill police and ASIO officers.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 28^th, 2014 at 4:11pm:

deport them.

Where to exactly? 


Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 28^th, 2014 at 4:11pm:

deport all their families

Do you often like to punish innocent people for the crimes of others?

Stratos wrote on Nov 28^th, 2014 at 5:00pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 28th, 2014 at 4:11pm: deport all their families Do you often like to punish innocent people for the crimes of others?

If they come here on the family reunion program then surely we should reunite them with their deported relative.

Kill them.

Hang Em and Hang Em High!

http://i258.photobucket.com/albums/hh248/Noctuscp/for_the_lulz/noose.jpg

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 28^th, 2014 at 5:05pm:

If they come here on the family reunion program then surely we should reunite them with their deported relative.

So yes, you do like to punish people for the crimes of others.  Very Old Testament of you.

Do you even know if these guys were immigrants?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8XrE0FSQv4

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 28^th, 2014 at 4:11pm:

Quote: TWO Muslims have refused to stand for a District Court judge, with one claiming they are not “at the behest of any authority other than Islam”.

So, exactly TWO Muslims have decided that they aren't subject to our legal system.  Do you think the legal system will accept that as a valid defence?  Really?

Sprint, your bigotry gets worse by the day.    ::)