Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll

Quote:

ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 1:31am:

Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780

Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Weird that child sex dolls are even made.

The story says fighting charges. What exactly would the charge be?

I don't really see a problem with it.....if he sticks to the doll, at least kids aren't being abused by him.

It would be a good thing if rapists stuck to the dolls too. No one is getting hurt, although I feel a bit sorry for the dolly, the sex police must too.

As an aside, I once worked with a bloke that used watermelons for sex, he said it felt the same as a woman lol!!!!!!....I never put my fruit in the tea room fridge again.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Weird that child sex dolls are even made. The story says fighting charges. What exactly would the charge be? I don't really see a problem with it.....if he sticks to the doll, at least kids aren't being abused by him It would be a good thing if rapists stuck to the dolls too. No one is getting hurt, although I feel a bit sorry for the dolly, the sex police must too. As an aside, I once worked with a bloke that used watermelons for sex, he said it felt the same as a woman lol!!!!!!....I never put my fruit in the tea room fridge again.

;D ;D ;D

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Weird that child sex dolls are even made. The story says fighting charges. What exactly would the charge be? I don't really see a problem with it.....if he sticks to the doll, at least kids aren't being abused by him It would be a good thing if rapists stuck to the dolls too. No one is getting hurt, although I feel a bit sorry for the dolly, the sex police must too. As an aside, I once worked with a bloke that used watermelons for sex, he said it felt the same as a woman lol!!!!!!....I never put my fruit in the tea room fridge again.

What exactly would the charge be?


If you read the article there apparently is a law referring to child sex material ?

I find this strange and unsettling, rather outrageous.

I would think that for someone with this problem it is a better solution than the real thing. I suppose the other side of the argument is that this could lead to real attacks on children. I do not know if that would be true.

Better ban all sex toys & porn then as well.

for goodness sake if it saves one child from being a victim of a paedophile/sexual abuse then what's the problem?

Too many wankers in positions of authority trying to justify their existence.

What if the bloke was a dwarf & wanted something more to his stature?

Too many "what ifs"

Gnads wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:08am:

Too many wankers in positions of authority trying to justify their existence. What if the bloke was a dwarf & wanted something more to his stature? Too many "what ifs"

What if he was a teacher of one of your children? Would you feel comfortable with that?

What if he was a priest?

I really don't know whether the doll would provide a harmless outlet or encourage them to progress to the real thing. That one I would have to leave to the psychology experts.

Now that the police and security agencies have all these extra powers it shouldn't be too hard for them to keep such a person under surveillance. Perhaps even keep them in secret detention without charge.

No - banned.  My question is :-  What kind of utterly warped mind would come up with such a doll?

Another cheap Asian import?  A global economy where anything goes... well, I suppose we all knew that already....

"Asians will become middle class consumers of high quality finished goods" (and then lapse into utter decadence for want of any need to go out and catch dinner)...

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 6:08am:

Weird that child sex dolls are even made. The story says fighting charges. What exactly would the charge be? I don't really see a problem with it.....if he sticks to the doll, at least kids aren't being abused by him It would be a good thing if rapists stuck to the dolls too. No one is getting hurt, although I feel a bit sorry for the dolly, the sex police must too. As an aside, I once worked with a bloke that used watermelons for sex, he said it felt the same as a woman lol!!!!!!....I never put my fruit in the tea room fridge again.

It's the shared fruit bowl you need to be concerned about, some think of it as an orgy.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 10:01am:

No - banned.  My question is :-  What kind of utterly warped mind would come up with such a doll?

If there is a market for it then it will be made. That is Capitalism 101

The_Barnacle wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 9:15am:

Gnads wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:08am: Too many wankers in positions of authority trying to justify their existence. What if the bloke was a dwarf & wanted something more to his stature? Too many "what ifs" What if he was a teacher of one of your children? Would you feel comfortable with that? What if he was a priest? I really don't know whether the doll would provide a harmless outlet or encourage them to progress to the real thing. That one I would have to leave to the psychology experts. Now that the police and security agencies have all these extra powers it shouldn't be too hard for them to keep such a person under surveillance. Perhaps even keep them in secret detention without charge.

The man is ill -

he needs psychiatric help - & fast.

As I said - too many what ifs.... & too many assumptions.

If it was all done in the privacy of their own home who would give a ferk?

No ones business but their own.

As for secret detention & surveillance - already happening isn't it?

some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls?

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:35pm:

some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls?

Having some sort of experience with a plastic doll is 'normalising?'  Yeas?

It is not something I'd do at all, let alone 'normally.'  Anyone else?

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:43pm:

[ It is not something I'd do at all, let alone 'normally.'  Anyone else?

Im glad to hear that but this thread is about pedophiles.   

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:58pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:43pm: [ It is not something I'd do at all, let alone 'normally.'  Anyone else? Im glad to hear that but this thread is about pedophiles.

How does doing whatever with a plastic doll normalise anything? 

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:35pm:

some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls?

I can see the danger -
that man must be stopped before he turns his attentions to real children.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:15pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:35pm: some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls? I can see the danger - that man must be stopped before he turns his attentions to real children.

this

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:15pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:35pm: some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls? I can see the danger - that man must be stopped before he turns his attentions to real children.

So, Sir Bobby, you have evidence establishing that having some weird experience with a plastic doll 'normalises' having some weird experience with a plastic doll?  And, if so, who cares and why?

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:33pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:15pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:35pm: some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls? I can see the danger - that man must be stopped before he turns his attentions to real children. So, Sir Bobby, you have evidence establishing that having some weird experience with a plastic doll 'normalises' having some weird experience with a plastic doll?  And, if so, who cares and why?

Surely you are not defending this creep's fetish?

forgiven

namaste

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:41pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:33pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:15pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:35pm: some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls? I can see the danger - that man must be stopped before he turns his attentions to real children. So, Sir Bobby, you have evidence establishing that having some weird experience with a plastic doll 'normalises' having some weird experience with a plastic doll?  And, if so, who cares and why? Surely you are not defending this creep's fetish? forgiven namaste

I could not care less what he gets up to in his bedroom with his bits of plastic.  However, if you can show me there is some evidence establishing that having some weird experiences with a bit of plastic normalises anything, I'd be happy to see it.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:41pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:33pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:15pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:35pm: some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls? I can see the danger - that man must be stopped before he turns his attentions to real children. So, Sir Bobby, you have evidence establishing that having some weird experience with a plastic doll 'normalises' having some weird experience with a plastic doll?  And, if so, who cares and why? Surely you are not defending this creep's fetish? forgiven namaste

Do you want to ban people from having fetishes, bobby?

How would you do that, exactly?

How would you stop men from shitting in their mothers' handbags, in the privacy of their own homes?

Aussie,

Quote:

a bit of plastic

- that happens to look like a child with genital orifices for pumping.

This must be the End Times.

I am the only sane person left.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:46pm:

Aussie, Quote: a bit of plastic - that happens to look like a child with genital orifices for pumping. This must be the End Times. I am the only sane person left.

I doubt that Sir Bobby.  But....it will be interesting to see how that prosecution fares.

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:59pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:46pm: Aussie, Quote: a bit of plastic - that happens to look like a child with genital orifices for pumping. This must be the End Times. I am the only sane person left. I doubt that Sir Bobby.  But....it will be interesting to see how that prosecution fares.

I posted it on my End Times thread:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1298455599/675#684

what more evidence do we need?

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:59pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:46pm: Aussie, Quote: a bit of plastic - that happens to look like a child with genital orifices for pumping. This must be the End Times. I am the only sane person left. I doubt that Sir Bobby.  But....it will be interesting to see how that prosecution fares. I posted it on my End Times thread: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1298455599/675#684 what more evidence do we need?

That you copied it into some other Thread is evidence of what?

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:45pm:

[ Do you want to ban people from having fetishes, bobby? How would you do that, exactly? How would you stop men from shitting in their mothers' handbags, in the privacy of their own homes?

this thread isnt about shitting in handbags, its about pedophiles buying sex toys simulating young children for the purpose of living out their pedophile fanatasies.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 3:46pm:

Aussie, Quote: a bit of plastic - that happens to look like a child with genital orifices for pumping. This must be the End Times. I am the only sane person left.

yes Bobby, thats exactly what it is. I knew this thread would bring out the pedophile apologists.

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:45pm: [ Do you want to ban people from having fetishes, bobby? How would you do that, exactly? How would you stop men from shitting in their mothers' handbags, in the privacy of their own homes? this thread isnt about shitting in handbags, its about pedophiles buying sex toys simulating young children for the purpose of living out their pedophile fanatasies.

Do you want to ban fantasies?

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:19pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:45pm: [ Do you want to ban people from having fetishes, bobby? How would you do that, exactly? How would you stop men from shitting in their mothers' handbags, in the privacy of their own homes? this thread isnt about shitting in handbags, its about pedophiles buying sex toys simulating young children for the purpose of living out their pedophile fanatasies. Do you want to ban fantasies?

no. I want to ban people buying and owning life sized child mannikins in order to perpetrate pedophile fantasies. Is my position clear now?

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:21pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:19pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:45pm: [ Do you want to ban people from having fetishes, bobby? How would you do that, exactly? How would you stop men from shitting in their mothers' handbags, in the privacy of their own homes? this thread isnt about shitting in handbags, its about pedophiles buying sex toys simulating young children for the purpose of living out their pedophile fanatasies. Do you want to ban fantasies? no. I want to ban people buying and owning life sized child mannikins in order to perpetrate pedophile fantasies. Is my position clear now?

Given the choice of having a pedophile out on the street, with his balls full, and a pedophile locked away in his own room, with a piece of plastic that he uses to relieve his frustration, I know what I'd prefer.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:24pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:21pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:19pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:15pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:45pm: [ Do you want to ban people from having fetishes, bobby? How would you do that, exactly? How would you stop men from shitting in their mothers' handbags, in the privacy of their own homes? this thread isnt about shitting in handbags, its about pedophiles buying sex toys simulating young children for the purpose of living out their pedophile fanatasies. Do you want to ban fantasies? no. I want to ban people buying and owning life sized child mannikins in order to perpetrate pedophile fantasies. Is my position clear now? Given the choice of having a pedophile out on the street, with his balls full, and a pedophile locked away in his own room, with a piece of plastic that he uses to relieve his frustration, I know what I'd prefer.

Don't say any more Mr Peccary.  Wait for ian to tell you what he knew would be said.

I  will offer a more detailed response later, I have things to do now.

Sounds like a storm in a teacup.   A great deal of moral outrage and hysteria which has been whipped up over what in reality is very little.

Everybody has their own private sex fantasies.  Some sicker than others.  Paedophilia is unlawful.  However, for such a thing to be judged Paedophilia, a live human child must be involved.   This is a sex toy.   If the Paedophile had imported a rubber vagina, and fantasised about it being that of a young female child, would the authorities have known and stopped it?   So what if that rubber vagina is surrounded by plastic in the shape of a human body?  How does that really change things?

Paedophiles are sick individuals.   They need help.  However, charging him with Paedophilia over a rubber doll?   I'm sorry, that is simply ridiculous.   ::)

boobies just upset that some bloke preferred a doll to him  ;D ;D ;D

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Sounds like a storm in a teacup.   A great deal of moral outrage and hysteria which has been whipped up over what in reality is very little. Everybody has their own private sex fantasies.  Some sicker than others.  Paedophilia is unlawful.  However, for such a thing to be judged Paedophilia, a live human child must be involved.   This is a sex toy.   If the Paedophile had imported a rubber vagina, and fantasised about it being that of a young female child, would the authorities have known and stopped it?   So what if that rubber vagina is surrounded by plastic in the shape of a human body?  How does that really change things? Paedophiles are sick individuals.   They need help.  However, charging him with Paedophilia over a rubber doll?   I'm sorry, that is simply ridiculous.   ::)

ian knew you were going to say that, and he is having a rest to prepare the next thing you will say.

Seriously, what people get up to in the privacy of their own homes/bedrooms is nobodies business as long as no one gets hurt and in this case the plastic doll has no feeling. Don't tell our pedo friend that though, I wouldn't be surprised if the thing cries, it's freaking sick.

Do the adult sex dolls have recorded messages/sounds built in? Wouldn't it be fun if you get hold of someones ( wear rubber gloves) and put a different tape in.......eeeer little weaner (laughing)

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:00pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:59pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 3:46pm: Aussie, Quote: a bit of plastic - that happens to look like a child with genital orifices for pumping. This must be the End Times. I am the only sane person left. I doubt that Sir Bobby.  But....it will be interesting to see how that prosecution fares. I posted it on my End Times thread: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1298455599/675#684 what more evidence do we need? That you copied it into some other Thread is evidence of what?

Further evidence that this is the End Times.

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 5:08pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:47pm: Sounds like a storm in a teacup.   A great deal of moral outrage and hysteria which has been whipped up over what in reality is very little. Everybody has their own private sex fantasies.  Some sicker than others.  Paedophilia is unlawful.  However, for such a thing to be judged Paedophilia, a live human child must be involved.   This is a sex toy.   If the Paedophile had imported a rubber vagina, and fantasised about it being that of a young female child, would the authorities have known and stopped it?   So what if that rubber vagina is surrounded by plastic in the shape of a human body?  How does that really change things? Paedophiles are sick individuals.   They need help.  However, charging him with Paedophilia over a rubber doll?   I'm sorry, that is simply ridiculous.   ::) ian knew you were going to say that, and he is having a rest to prepare the next thing you will say.

Ah.  OK, so now we are all glove puppets?   ;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 4:24pm:

Given the choice of having a pedophile out on the street, with his balls full, and a pedophile locked away in his own room, with a piece of plastic that he uses to relieve his frustration, I know what I'd prefer.

I see a bigger picture in this than simply the need to relieve someones sexual frustration, I would say your point depends on pedophilia being viewed as a valid sexual orientation and you also presume that if denied the opportunity to releive their sexual frustration in this way then these predators would invariably be out on the street looking for kids to rape. Do you know any heterosexuals with unreleived sexual urges? Are they all out on the street looking for women to rape? See the difference? Ever masturbated Greg like most males or is your first resort to either buy sex or rape a woman? Pedophilia by its nature is predatory behaviour and not just about  sexual urges. we know this because many of those who have been chemically castrated in countries which allow it still have been shown to prey on children. I  just dont know where people get this idea that pedophilia is a sexual orientation and nothing else, it is implicit in the human genetic code to protect children, there have been studies done which shows this is the case except for a small group of individuals in society. ( psychopaths). We need to draw a line in the sand  in my opinion on this or we will never win the battle against these predators, My opinion we should not tolerate something because its too hard to police, the line should be zero tolerance towards pedophiles and the message needs to be tougher, a lot tougher. I think capitulating because the alternative is rape of our kids is an easy way out for us but not for the long term, giving thee predators the message that they can legally buy aids to continually reinforce ther behaviour is probably about the worst thing we can, ts like continually giving heroin to a drug addict

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:24pm: Given the choice of having a pedophile out on the street, with his balls full, and a pedophile locked away in his own room, with a piece of plastic that he uses to relieve his frustration, I know what I'd prefer. I see a bigger picture in this than simply the need to relieve someones sexual frustration, I would say your point depends on pedophilia being viewed as a valid sexual orientation and you also presume that if denied the opportunity to releive their sexual frustration in this way then these predators would invariably be out on the street looking for kids to rape. Do you know any heterosexuals with unreleived sexual urges? Are they all out on the street looking for women to rape? See the difference? Ever masturbated Greg like most males or is your first resort to either buy sex or rape a woman? Pedophilia by its nature is predatory behaviour and not just about  sexual urges. we know this because many of those who have been chemically castrated in countries which allow it still have been shown to prey on children. I  just dont know where people get this idea that pedophilia is a sexual orientation and nothing else, it is implicit in the human genetic code to protect children, there have been studies done which shows this is the case except for a small group of individuals in society. ( psychopaths). We need to draw a line in the sand  in my opinion on this or we will never win the battle against these predators, My opinion we should not tolerate something because its too hard to police, the line should be zero tolerance towards pedophiles and the message needs to be tougher, a lot tougher. I think capitulating because the alternative is rape of our kids is an easy way out for us but not for the long term, giving thee predators the message that they can legally buy aids to continually reinforce ther behaviour is probably about the worst thing we can, ts like continually giving heroin to a drug addict

I knew you knew that I would know that you'd say just that.  So, I know you know that I already know you know what my next point is.  Your answer to it, please ian?

On another point, in my opinion a pedophile who has acted out his fantasies towards a child or children more than once should be classed as a predatory psychopath and not a pedophile, they share much of the characteristics.

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:57am:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused.

Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 6:05pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 5:08pm: Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:47pm: Sounds like a storm in a teacup.   A great deal of moral outrage and hysteria which has been whipped up over what in reality is very little. Everybody has their own private sex fantasies.  Some sicker than others.  Paedophilia is unlawful.  However, for such a thing to be judged Paedophilia, a live human child must be involved.   This is a sex toy.   If the Paedophile had imported a rubber vagina, and fantasised about it being that of a young female child, would the authorities have known and stopped it?   So what if that rubber vagina is surrounded by plastic in the shape of a human body?  How does that really change things? Paedophiles are sick individuals.   They need help.  However, charging him with Paedophilia over a rubber doll?   I'm sorry, that is simply ridiculous.   ::) ian knew you were going to say that, and he is having a rest to prepare the next thing you will say. Ah.  OK, so now we are all glove puppets?   ;)

Hands up all those who are glove puppets... wait a minute......  I'll get back to you... gotta have a talk with my writers....

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:57am: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused. Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA.  You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines.

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 6:05pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 5:08pm: Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:47pm: Sounds like a storm in a teacup.   A great deal of moral outrage and hysteria which has been whipped up over what in reality is very little. Everybody has their own private sex fantasies.  Some sicker than others.  Paedophilia is unlawful.  However, for such a thing to be judged Paedophilia, a live human child must be involved.   This is a sex toy.   If the Paedophile had imported a rubber vagina, and fantasised about it being that of a young female child, would the authorities have known and stopped it?   So what if that rubber vagina is surrounded by plastic in the shape of a human body?  How does that really change things? Paedophiles are sick individuals.   They need help.  However, charging him with Paedophilia over a rubber doll?   I'm sorry, that is simply ridiculous.   ::) ian knew you were going to say that, and he is having a rest to prepare the next thing you will say. Ah.  OK, so now we are all glove puppets?   ;)

I dont think he is referring to sock puppets, I  played him like a banjo yesterday and hes got his panties in a bunch.

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:02pm:

freediver wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 7:54pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:57am: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused. Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn". Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA.  You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines.

can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim.

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:03pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:02pm: freediver wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 7:54pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:57am: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused. Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn". Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA.  You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines. can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim.

No....find it yourself.  FD can confirm.

Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought.

Link.

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:04pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:03pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:02pm: freediver wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 7:54pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:57am: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused. Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn". Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA.  You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines. can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim. No....find it yourself.  FD can confirm. Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought. Link.

I cant see any post in  that thread confirming your claim.

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:12pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:04pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:03pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:02pm: freediver wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 7:54pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:57am: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused. Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn". Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA.  You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines. can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim. No....find it yourself.  FD can confirm. Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought. Link. I cant see any post in  that thread confirming your claim.

You did not see the 'cartoon?'

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 6:05pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 5:08pm: Brian Ross wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:47pm: Sounds like a storm in a teacup.   A great deal of moral outrage and hysteria which has been whipped up over what in reality is very little. Everybody has their own private sex fantasies.  Some sicker than others.  Paedophilia is unlawful.  However, for such a thing to be judged Paedophilia, a live human child must be involved.   This is a sex toy.   If the Paedophile had imported a rubber vagina, and fantasised about it being that of a young female child, would the authorities have known and stopped it?   So what if that rubber vagina is surrounded by plastic in the shape of a human body?  How does that really change things? Paedophiles are sick individuals.   They need help.  However, charging him with Paedophilia over a rubber doll?   I'm sorry, that is simply ridiculous.   ::) ian knew you were going to say that, and he is having a rest to prepare the next thing you will say. Ah.  OK, so now we are all glove puppets?   ;) Hands up all those who are glove puppets... wait a minute......  I'll get back to you... gotta have a talk with my writers....

http://mlblogssfdiamondgirl.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/waving.gif

No, wait, no I'm not.  I don't think I am.  The captain made me post that!  ;)

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:18pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:12pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:04pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:03pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:02pm: freediver wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 7:54pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:57am: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused. Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn". Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA.  You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines. can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim. No....find it yourself.  FD can confirm. Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought. Link. I cant see any post in  that thread confirming your claim. You did not see the 'cartoon?'

your claimed public advice, where is it.

freediver wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:54pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:57am: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused. Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn".

Googled it... Weird huh?

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:22pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:18pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:12pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:04pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:03pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:02pm: freediver wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 7:54pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 2:57am: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 1:31am: Sydney man fighting charges for allegedly owning a child-sized sex doll Quote: ALLEGED pedophiles are importing lifelike silicon sex dolls in the shape of children as young as 12 and labelling them as movie props in an attempt to fool authorities. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sydney-man-fighting-charges-for-allegedly-owning-a-childsized-sex-doll/story-fni0cx12-1227116230985?nk=306ce646567bf3d7b09a17b4e335ebfb#itm=newscomau%7Chome%7Cnca-homepage-masthead-feature%7C2%7Cheading%7Chomepage%7Chomepage&itmt=1415460384780 Weird on both sides. Weird for wanting one and weird for authorities thinking they are kids that will be abused. Cartoon and text-based child pornography is also illegal, even though no children are directly harmed. There was a case recently of a guy getting convicted for possessing "simpsons porn". Indeed it is, and yet you specifically allowed it here and elsewhere at PA.  You even ridiculed my public advice to you along those precise lines. can you show where you did that thanks if thats your claim. No....find it yourself.  FD can confirm. Edit.....it was easier to find than I thought. Link. I cant see any post in  that thread confirming your claim. You did not see the 'cartoon?' your claimed public advice, where is it.

Harder to find, but FD can confirm.  It may have been elsewhere at PA.

Let the record show Aussie was unable to provide evidence of his claim that he "publically advised Freedriver"

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:28pm:

Let the record show Aussie was unable to provide evidence of his claim that he "publically advised Freedriver"

Indeed, the record speaks for itself and there is nothing you can do to change it ian.

I actually have quite a good memory and remember that well but thanks for finding the thread anyway. I never actually questioned that you advised FD but I know you did because I can remember you doing so. I can also remember others advising him, maybe even before you did. You made an interesting observation though " I publically advised FD"

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:37pm:

I actually have quite a good memory and remember that well but thanks for finding the thread anyway. I never actually questioned that you advised FD but I kn ow you did because I can remember you dong so. I can also remember others advising him, maybe even before you did. You made an interesting observation though " I publically advised FD"

And do you also recall freediver ridiculing the advice I gave him?

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:38pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:37pm: I actually have quite a good memory and remember that well but thanks for finding the thread anyway. I never actually questioned that you advised FD but I kn ow you did because I can remember you dong so. I can also remember others advising him, maybe even before you did. You made an interesting observation though " I publically advised FD" And do you also recall freediver ridiculing the advice I gave him?

no

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 8:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:38pm: ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 8:37pm: I actually have quite a good memory and remember that well but thanks for finding the thread anyway. I never actually questioned that you advised FD but I kn ow you did because I can remember you dong so. I can also remember others advising him, maybe even before you did. You made an interesting observation though " I publically advised FD" And do you also recall freediver ridiculing the advice I gave him? no

Your memory sucks.  (It may have been at PA.)

http://churchpuppets.co.uk/communities/4/004/008/994/474//images/4565959142_415x276.jpg


Just singing in the choir....

ian wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 2:35pm:

some interesting answers here. Can no one see the danger in allowing pedophiles to reinforce and normalise their behaviour by using these dolls?

The guy obviously has a problem, I would think that denying him an outlet for his issue may be more likely to push him toward the real thing.

Really it should come down to if he has hurt someone or is an imminent danger. That is why we have laws, not because someone is a bit strange or because we may be disgusted or creeped out by them. I don't care if any of you play with dolls, it's not something the govt should worry about either.

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 10:51pm:

Really it should come down to if he has hurt someone or is an imminent danger. That is why we have laws, not because someone is a bit strange or because we may be disgusted or creeped out by them. I don't care if any of you play with dolls, it's not something the govt should worry about either.

If you had kids in a block of flats & that creep was living next to you
would you be worried?

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 11:16pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 10:51pm: Really it should come down to if he has hurt someone or is an imminent danger. That is why we have laws, not because someone is a bit strange or because we may be disgusted or creeped out by them. I don't care if any of you play with dolls, it's not something the govt should worry about either. If you had kids in a block of flats & that creep was living next to you would you be worried?

Oh dear, I've brought up three sons, youngest is almost 20. How would I know what my neighbour does? Why should I know? Why would I want to? No, I was never paranoid that a doll fiddler lived next door, imagine that.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 11:16pm:

Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 10:51pm: Really it should come down to if he has hurt someone or is an imminent danger. That is why we have laws, not because someone is a bit strange or because we may be disgusted or creeped out by them. I don't care if any of you play with dolls, it's not something the govt should worry about either. If you had kids in a block of flats & that creep was living next to you would you be worried?

Unless you snooped into his bed/toy room, you'd never know Sir Bobby. 

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 11:30pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 11:16pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 10:51pm: Really it should come down to if he has hurt someone or is an imminent danger. That is why we have laws, not because someone is a bit strange or because we may be disgusted or creeped out by them. I don't care if any of you play with dolls, it's not something the govt should worry about either. If you had kids in a block of flats & that creep was living next to you would you be worried? Unless you snooped into his bed/toy room, you'd never know Sir Bobby.

I dunno, there are a few here I think could moonlight as inanimate latex playthings. It could be first hand...

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 11:30pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 11:16pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 10:51pm: Really it should come down to if he has hurt someone or is an imminent danger. That is why we have laws, not because someone is a bit strange or because we may be disgusted or creeped out by them. I don't care if any of you play with dolls, it's not something the govt should worry about either. If you had kids in a block of flats & that creep was living next to you would you be worried? Unless you snooped into his bed/toy room, you'd never know Sir Bobby.

True, and if you never knew you were living next door to a convicted pedo you would never know.  But if you found out would you be a bit unhappy about it or be all done his time, done his crime, accepting? 

Datalife wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 11:47pm:

Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 11:30pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 11:16pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 10:51pm: Really it should come down to if he has hurt someone or is an imminent danger. That is why we have laws, not because someone is a bit strange or because we may be disgusted or creeped out by them. I don't care if any of you play with dolls, it's not something the govt should worry about either. If you had kids in a block of flats & that creep was living next to you would you be worried? Unless you snooped into his bed/toy room, you'd never know Sir Bobby.  True, and if you never knew you were living next door to a convicted pedo you would never know.  But if you found out would you be a bit unhappy about it or be all done his time, done his crime, accepting?

I think it's the right of all Australians to know the height of their neighbours toys. We should hold neighbourhood open days. How tall is yours? How long have you had it, is it easy to keep clean?

Setanta wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 11:53pm:

Datalife wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 11:47pm: Aussie wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 11:30pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 11:16pm: Setanta wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 10:51pm: Really it should come down to if he has hurt someone or is an imminent danger. That is why we have laws, not because someone is a bit strange or because we may be disgusted or creeped out by them. I don't care if any of you play with dolls, it's not something the govt should worry about either. If you had kids in a block of flats & that creep was living next to you would you be worried? Unless you snooped into his bed/toy room, you'd never know Sir Bobby.  True, and if you never knew you were living next door to a convicted pedo you would never know.  But if you found out would you be a bit unhappy about it or be all done his time, done his crime, accepting?  I think it's the right of all Australians to know the height of their neighbours toys. We should hold neighbourhood open days. How tall is yours? How long have you had it, is it easy to keep clean?

I think that is a silly right, but by all means carry on wth your rant.

Playing out your perverted fantasies by smacking life like imitations of children is going to save kids?

W..T..F.. sort of drugs are some of you people on?

Drag the sick arseholes out the back and shoot them.

There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles.

We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal.

What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business.

There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes....

You better round them all up as well.

It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue.

Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse.

Gnads wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 10:34am:

There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse.

Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"?

Drag your sick arse out the back as well.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 10:49am:

Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well.

I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 10:51am:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll.

Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 10:54am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:51am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll. Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard.

It appears that you weren't aware, as this is what you actually said: "Wanting to have sex with little kids ... "

There's a big difference between a doll and a kid.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 11:12am:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:54am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:51am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll. Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard. It appears that you weren't aware, as this is what you actually said: "Wanting to have sex with little kids ... " There's a big difference between a doll and a kid.

Do you think it is OK for adults to bugger dolls made to imitate little kids?

That's the only question i care about.

And if you think it is, IMO, you're a worthless piece of crap that should be shot.

Thanks.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 11:15am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:12am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:54am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:51am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll. Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard. It appears that you weren't aware, as this is what you actually said: "Wanting to have sex with little kids ... " There's a big difference between a doll and a kid. Do you think it is OK for adults to bugger dolls made to imitate little kids? That's the only question i care about. And if you think it is, IMO, you're a worthless piece of crap that should be shot. Thanks.

OK?  No.  I find it quite weird.

Lots of weird things happen behind closed doors.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 11:15am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:12am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:54am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:51am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll. Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard. It appears that you weren't aware, as this is what you actually said: "Wanting to have sex with little kids ... " There's a big difference between a doll and a kid. Do you think it is OK for adults to bugger dolls made to imitate little kids? That's the only question i care about. And if you think it is, IMO, you're a worthless piece of crap that should be shot. Thanks.

In Greg's defence..it IS a whole lot 'better' that they bugger dolls than real kids....don't you agree?? (providing they don't 'escalate' of course)

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 11:42am:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:15am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:12am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:54am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:51am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll. Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard. It appears that you weren't aware, as this is what you actually said: "Wanting to have sex with little kids ... " There's a big difference between a doll and a kid. Do you think it is OK for adults to bugger dolls made to imitate little kids? That's the only question i care about. And if you think it is, IMO, you're a worthless piece of crap that should be shot. Thanks. In Greg's defence..it IS a whole lot 'better' that they bugger dolls than real kids....don't you agree?? (providing they don't 'escalate' of course)

IF you can prove to me it doesn't fuel their perverted desires to abuse innocent little kids, which you can't.

Quote:

IF you can prove to me it doesn't fuel their perverted desires to abuse innocent little kids, which you can't.

I can't prove that you wanking will not fuel any perverted desire to abuse innocent little kids either.  Shall we make it illegal for you to wank?

Aussie wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 3:38pm:

Quote: IF you can prove to me it doesn't fuel their perverted desires to abuse innocent little kids, which you can't. I can't prove that you wanking will not fuel any perverted desire to abuse innocent little kids either.  Shall we make it illegal for you to play?

You're getting dumber every day. Must be something to do with having the hots for Clive. Now go away, there's no time for tards here.

Wise men speak because they have something to say.

Idiots speak because they want to say something.

PS you're the later, dumbo.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 3:31pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:42am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:15am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:12am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:54am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:51am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll. Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard. It appears that you weren't aware, as this is what you actually said: "Wanting to have sex with little kids ... " There's a big difference between a doll and a kid. Do you think it is OK for adults to bugger dolls made to imitate little kids? That's the only question i care about. And if you think it is, IMO, you're a worthless piece of crap that should be shot. Thanks. In Greg's defence..it IS a whole lot 'better' that they bugger dolls than real kids....don't you agree?? (providing they don't 'escalate' of course) IF you can prove to me it doesn't fuel their perverted desires to abuse innocent little kids, which you can't.

True...but then you can't prove that does fuel etc....

Gnads wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 10:34am:

We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. .

no kidding. Lol

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 10:15pm:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 3:31pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:42am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:15am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:12am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:54am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:51am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll. Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard. It appears that you weren't aware, as this is what you actually said: "Wanting to have sex with little kids ... " There's a big difference between a doll and a kid. Do you think it is OK for adults to bugger dolls made to imitate little kids? That's the only question i care about. And if you think it is, IMO, you're a worthless piece of crap that should be shot. Thanks. In Greg's defence..it IS a whole lot 'better' that they bugger dolls than real kids....don't you agree?? (providing they don't 'escalate' of course) IF you can prove to me it doesn't fuel their perverted desires to abuse innocent little kids, which you can't. True...but then you can't prove that does fuel etc....

just buying the child sex doll is proof that it does. Idiot.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 10:49am:

Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well.

Yep .... You're a dickhead.

Time to go to spec savers ::)

rhino wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 11:13pm:

Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. . no kidding. Lol

So smart arse ... What's this bloke done that's illegal?

rhino wrote on Nov 10^th, 2014 at 11:15pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:15pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 3:31pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:42am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:15am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:12am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:54am: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:51am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:49am: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: There a more people out there with predatory inclinations not just paedophiles. We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. What someone does in the privacy of their home is no ones business. There are many people with kinky sexual fetishes.... You better round them all up as well. It's a load of BS .... Unless he breaks the law ... & who says he will... It's a non issue. Maybe we should prevent people drinking alcohol because it conditions/causes people to do stupid & illegal things... Including child sexual abuse. Wanting to have sex with little kids is a "kinky fetish"? Drag your sick arse out the back as well. I think you'll find that he was talking about having sex with a doll. Dolls meant to imitate little kids. yes i am aware of this, thank you Richard. It appears that you weren't aware, as this is what you actually said: "Wanting to have sex with little kids ... " There's a big difference between a doll and a kid. Do you think it is OK for adults to bugger dolls made to imitate little kids? That's the only question i care about. And if you think it is, IMO, you're a worthless piece of crap that should be shot. Thanks. In Greg's defence..it IS a whole lot 'better' that they bugger dolls than real kids....don't you agree?? (providing they don't 'escalate' of course) IF you can prove to me it doesn't fuel their perverted desires to abuse innocent little kids, which you can't. True...but then you can't prove that does fuel etc.... just buying the child sex doll is proof that it does. Idiot.

BS ... It may be proof for you're tiny mind but other than that it's a non event.

Much like your input.

right. So buying and using a child sex toy doesnt prove someone is a pedophile. ::) ::)  I think Ian hit the nail on the head only he was too kind to you, no wonder pedophilia is epidemic with all the defenders on here.

Gnads wrote on Nov 11^th, 2014 at 12:11pm:

rhino wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 11:13pm: Gnads wrote on Nov 10th, 2014 at 10:34am: We have laws covering any behaviour deemed illegal. . no kidding. Lol So smart arse ... What's this bloke done that's illegal?

read the orginall post Gumpy, hes on charges

Quote:

So buying and using a child sex toy doesnt prove someone is a pedophile.

Quite correct.  Well done.

Aussie wrote on Nov 11^th, 2014 at 1:34pm:

Quote: So buying and using a child sex toy doesnt prove someone is a pedophile. Quite correct.  Well done.

I was being sarcastic Rumpole. Id say having fantasies of rooting children would pretty much confirm the pedophile diagnosis dont you think or doesnt your legal background allow you to put 2 and 2 together   ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids.

I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses.

What a bunch of spastics.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11^th, 2014 at 3:38pm:

Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics.

I know I don't but who am I to stop you if that's is what you want to do.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11^th, 2014 at 3:38pm:

Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics.

Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY?

Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it?

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11^th, 2014 at 5:23pm:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it?

So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids?


What a sick piece of ****.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11^th, 2014 at 5:23pm:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY?

Surely they have blowup sheep in New Zealand    :-/

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 10:05am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****.

they all think its ok, its an example of how sick this society is. years ago homos were not ok now its all right, this is what is happening with pedos now. In trendy inner city coffee shops all over australia the subject of discussion is how to make the next perversion mainstream. It makes me sick. nGuns are banned, homos are the flavor of the month and now child sex dolls.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 10:05am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****.

What do you call your blow up filly FriYAY?

Maybe you couldn't afford a horse, not having a job is tough, she might be a mule, cheaper are they?

disgusting and perverted. You will all be buggering your pet monkeys next. No wonder this society is going down the gurgler, this is the sort of decadent perverted behaviour that lead to the collapse of the Roman Empire.

I would think any reasonable person would think someone smacking a doll that was representing a child to be somewhat distasteful and sick.

Obviously that belief is not universal.  Diversity innit.  Wheeeeeeeeeeeeee. 

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 11:12am:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:05am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****. What do you call your blow up filly FriYAY? Maybe you couldn't afford a horse, not having a job is tough, she might be a mule, cheaper are they?

Useless troll.

I sincerely hope you have no family and if you do they stay well away from you. you might get your grand kids to sit as models for sex dolls for perverts.

rhino wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 10:58am:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:05am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****. they all think its ok, its an example of how sick this society is. years ago homos were not ok now its all right, this is what is happening with pedos now.

Comparing relationships between mutually consenting adults, with pedophilia.

Nice.

We have a live one here folks.

rhino wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 11:35am:

disgusting and perverted. You will all be buggering your pet monkeys next. No wonder this society is going down the gurgler, this is the sort of decadent perverted behaviour that lead to the collapse of the Roman Empire.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-NMIBbZmkbPc/UJMzqIr3ltI/AAAAAAAABMA/hsfqFeNMjwE/s1600/302735_3858285211378_1744654457_n.jpg

its been proven hasnt it? So you kicked an own goal theredidnt you  ;D :D ::)  Look whats happening now. First gays, now pedophilia is acceptable amongst the lefties. Pretty soon it will be compolsoury.  :'( :'(

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 12:03pm:

rhino wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:58am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:05am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****. they all think its ok, its an example of how sick this society is. years ago homos were not ok now its all right, this is what is happening with pedos now. Comparing relationships between mutually consenting adults, with pedophilia. Nice. We have a live one here folks.

its been proven that most pedos are also homos. You cannot argue with that. There is a definite link.

rhino wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 12:15pm:

its been proven hasnt it?

No.

rhino wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 12:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 12:03pm: rhino wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:58am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:05am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****. they all think its ok, its an example of how sick this society is. years ago homos were not ok now its all right, this is what is happening with pedos now. Comparing relationships between mutually consenting adults, with pedophilia. Nice. We have a live one here folks. its been proven that most pedos are also homos. You cannot argue with that. There is a definite link.

No.

Yes.

No.

rhino wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 10:58am:

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:05am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****. they all think its ok, its an example of how sick this society is. years ago homos were not ok now its all right, this is what is happening with pedos now. In trendy inner city coffee shops all over australia the subject of discussion is how to make the next perversion mainstream. It makes me sick. nGuns are banned, homos are the flavor of the month and now child sex dolls.

Listen knucklehead no one has said they think it's OK.
And it's not supporting paedophilia.

What's been said has been questioning why it would be illegal & what charges would be laid.

Also said about what people do behind closed doors sexually as consenting adults or carrying out their fantasies/fetishes/ kinky shyte is no ones business.

I think you should be monitored to see that you're all above board in the bedroom & that your sexual preferences don't go beyond the Puritan requirements of the missionary position & for procreation purposes only.

You sanctimonious t/wat.

Datalife wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 11:41am:

I would think any reasonable person would think someone smacking a doll that was representing a child to be somewhat distasteful and sick. Obviously that belief is not universal.  Diversity innit.  Wheeeeeeeeeeeeee.

That rates as "a penetrating statement of the blindingly obvious."

Gnads wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 12:46pm:

rhino wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:58am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:05am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****. they all think its ok, its an example of how sick this society is. years ago homos were not ok now its all right, this is what is happening with pedos now. In trendy inner city coffee shops all over australia the subject of discussion is how to make the next perversion mainstream. It makes me sick. nGuns are banned, homos are the flavor of the month and now child sex dolls. Listen knucklehead no one has said they think it's OK. And it's not supporting paedophilia. What's been said has been questioning why it would be illegal & what charges would be laid. Also said about what people do behind closed doors sexually as consenting adults or carrying out their fantasies/fetishes/ kinky shyte is no ones business. I think you should be monitored to see that you're all above board in the bedroom & that your sexual preferences don't go beyond the Puritan requirements of the missionary position & for procreation purposes only. You sanctimonious t/wat.

So people practicing having sex with little kids is Ok as long as it is behind closed doors.

Mmmmkay….

Quote:

So people practicing having sex with little kids is Ok as long as it is behind closed doors.

Where did anyone say that?  Post the quotes/posts.

Aussie wrote on Nov 9^th, 2014 at 7:31pm:

ian wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 7:25pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 9th, 2014 at 4:24pm: Given the choice of having a pedophile out on the street, with his balls full, and a pedophile locked away in his own room, with a piece of plastic that he uses to relieve his frustration, I know what I'd prefer. I see a bigger picture in this than simply the need to relieve someones sexual frustration, I would say your point depends on pedophilia being viewed as a valid sexual orientation and you also presume that if denied the opportunity to releive their sexual frustration in this way then these predators would invariably be out on the street looking for kids to rape. Do you know any heterosexuals with unreleived sexual urges? Are they all out on the street looking for women to rape? See the difference? Ever masturbated Greg like most males or is your first resort to either buy sex or rape a woman? Pedophilia by its nature is predatory behaviour and not just about  sexual urges. we know this because many of those who have been chemically castrated in countries which allow it still have been shown to prey on children. I  just dont know where people get this idea that pedophilia is a sexual orientation and nothing else, it is implicit in the human genetic code to protect children, there have been studies done which shows this is the case except for a small group of individuals in society. ( psychopaths). We need to draw a line in the sand  in my opinion on this or we will never win the battle against these predators, My opinion we should not tolerate something because its too hard to police, the line should be zero tolerance towards pedophiles and the message needs to be tougher, a lot tougher. I think capitulating because the alternative is rape of our kids is an easy way out for us but not for the long term, giving thee predators the message that they can legally buy aids to continually reinforce ther behaviour is probably about the worst thing we can, ts like continually giving heroin to a drug addict I knew you knew that I would know that you'd say just that.  So, I know you know that I already know you know what my next point is.  Your answer to it, please ian?

Man that is so becoming my new signature

rhino wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 12:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 12:03pm: rhino wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:58am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:05am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****. they all think its ok, its an example of how sick this society is. years ago homos were not ok now its all right, this is what is happening with pedos now. Comparing relationships between mutually consenting adults, with pedophilia. Nice. We have a live one here folks. its been proven that most pedos are also homos. You cannot argue with that. There is a definite link.

A similar linkage is that most pirates are also male therefore theres a linkage between being male and being a pirate.

It comes under the classification, correlation does not equal causation.

I hear the church has ordered a shipping container load of these dolls .....

John Smith wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 3:26pm:

I hear the church has ordered a shipping container load of these dolls .....

"Choir" dolls    ;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 3:34pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 3:26pm: I hear the church has ordered a shipping container load of these dolls ..... "Choir" dolls    ;)

'little angels '

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 2:10pm:

So people practicing having sex with little kids is Ok as long as it is behind closed doors.

That's a strange statement to make.

I think it's weird, myself.

Are you weird?

Aussie wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 2:17pm:

Quote: So people practicing having sex with little kids is Ok as long as it is behind closed doors. Where did anyone say that?  Post the quotes/posts.

I see we're still waiting for an answer on that.

King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12^th, 2014 at 2:10pm:

Gnads wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 12:46pm: rhino wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:58am: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 12th, 2014 at 10:05am: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 5:23pm: King FriYAY II wrote on Nov 11th, 2014 at 3:38pm: Never, ever, did i think i would see the day when people are making excuses why it is OK for people to buy and have sex with dolls that imitate little kids. I suppose you'll all go home and bugger you fake horses. What a bunch of spastics. Do they have life size animal sex toys too FriYAY? Does your horse say neigh when it doesn't want to do it? So you think it is Ok for people to bugger life like replicas of little kids? What a sick piece of ****. they all think its ok, its an example of how sick this society is. years ago homos were not ok now its all right, this is what is happening with pedos now. In trendy inner city coffee shops all over australia the subject of discussion is how to make the next perversion mainstream. It makes me sick. nGuns are banned, homos are the flavor of the month and now child sex dolls. Listen knucklehead no one has said they think it's OK. And it's not supporting paedophilia. What's been said has been questioning why it would be illegal & what charges would be laid. Also said about what people do behind closed doors sexually as consenting adults or carrying out their fantasies/fetishes/ kinky shyte is no ones business. I think you should be monitored to see that you're all above board in the bedroom & that your sexual preferences don't go beyond the Puritan requirements of the missionary position & for procreation purposes only. You sanctimonious t/wat. So people practicing having sex with little kids is Ok as long as it is behind closed doors. Mmmmkay….

So what is everyone else who's not actually having sex with another human being..... Whether that be, using sex aids, sex toys or adult sized sex dolls, is OK?

But someone using a small a smaller version whether or not he is a paedophile or potential paedophile or not
Is a criminal for doing so but all the other sexually deviant ( being not normal like you  ::) ) people are above reproach?

You & old mate are both sanctimonious twats.

What's your excuse for practising with the soap? ::)

sick puppies. Under the right circumstances you would all be agressively "questioned" and dealt with. The Singapore solution.

And you should be a victim of the final solution.

Self righteous prig.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq39iNlWTnw