freediver....there is an important PM waiting for you.  Please read and action ASAP.  Thanks.

Aussie wrote on Sep 27^th, 2014 at 4:06pm:

freediver....there is an important PM waiting for you.  Please read and action ASAP.  Thanks.

Sounds important. :)

skippy. wrote on Sep 29^th, 2014 at 7:39pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:06pm: freediver....there is an important PM waiting for you.  Please read and action ASAP.  Thanks. Sounds important. :)

Maybe, Maybe not, But given the downtime over the weekend, it may well have been received, a little late?

Freediver received this very important PM and replied, "No, Aussie, you can't be elected admin of Political Animal just because you brought in socks and OzPol blow-ins to vote.  Better luck next year."

Aussie sent a "very important PM" to Freediver urging him to hurry and count the votes from the PA election.  Freediver did count those votes and wisely dismissed all of Aussie's socks and meat puppets. Now Aussie seeks to blame others for his misdeeds. 

AiA wrote on Oct 6^th, 2014 at 11:11pm:

Aussie sent a "very important PM" to Freediver urging him to hurry and count the votes from the PA election.  Freediver did count those votes and wisely dismissed all of Aussie's socks and meat puppets. Now Aussie seeks to blame others for his misdeeds.

cods, you don't belong at PA for a very different reason:  you are the only one who believes Aussie is telling the truth.


well as you can see that thread has been locked...

before I could reply......seems to me AiA you a re very judgemental...

mantra says her posts are changed on many occasions...so why wouldnt they be changing aussies??..

I dont know what goes on over there.. all I can see is you are not helping to stop it and from what I was told you were the admin last year..

some people thrive on discord and causing problems then they usually disappear and watch from a distance........yeah I like that type.... >:(

do you approve of ganging up?????..... well I dont...

and I am not taking sides....as I have had my run ins with aussie on more than one occasion

but he did ask you a question which you didnt answer... speaks volumes as well you know..

why should I believe all you PA guys and not aussie??... what makes you all so honest?

Very perceptive post, cods!

I wish you would post like this in Politics Sux instead of your usual “Oh lefties ahahah blah blah blah.”

St George of the Garden wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 9:39am:

Very perceptive post, cods! I wish you would post like this in Politics Sux instead of your usual “Oh lefties ahahah blah blah blah.”

look whos talking...... ::) ::) ::)

do you read the abuse of the right...

yep of course you do....but you agree with it dont you..

thereby will remain the difference.

dont forget pol sux is an entirely different place...

I dont go anywhere near religion..no two people view it the same ...and it usually end up angry who needs that?

but you have to admit.. you lefties do get it wrong most of the time.. ;) ;)

That's weird, cods didn't even mention "lefties" in this thread.... until it was brought up by someone else.

Freedumb wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 5:08pm:

That's weird, cods didn't even mention "lefties" in this thread.... until it was brought up by someone else.

what about commenting on those who attack righties all the time...we are all the same you know scum and filth...when I see someone tell those people to pull their heads in one may have a bit more respect...

in the mean time..I do my level best not to abuse other people on a PERSONAL LEVEL...

some get confused with abusing  ones interpretation of Politics...

and abusing the messenger...

they seem to think its okay to say whatever they like regardless..and in some cases gang up...

its a pity some dont take a good look at themselves and realise what they are doing isnt right...

if you like.. St Geos.. comment was personal wasnt it?????

why not say well done cods for sticking up for a lefty

ooops.. not having a go free just saying thats all.

cods wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 7:15pm:

Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 5:08pm: That's weird, cods didn't even mention "lefties" in this thread.... until it was brought up by someone else. what about commenting on those who attack righties all the time...we are all the same you know scum and filth...when I see someone tell those people to pull their heads in one may have a bit more respect... in the mean time..I do my level best not to abuse other people on a PERSONAL LEVEL... some get confused with abusing  ones interpretation of Politics... and abusing the messenger... they seem to think its okay to say whatever they like regardless..and in some cases gang up... its a pity some dont take a good look at themselves and realise what they are doing isnt right... if you like.. St Geos.. comment was personal wasnt it????? why not say well done cods for sticking up for a lefty ooops.. not having a go free just saying thats all.

I understand.

I'm just blown away about how you're automatically assumed to be "abusing lefties" when you didn't even mention the word. I've seen you mention it in different threads but they're entirely different subjects. I don't think being a "leftie" or "righty" even comes into it.

The mind boggles.

Yes, we all do it. I have said many time, that there is a pattern -- which, a certain member from this forum actually had a go at me about because I kept repeating myself -- that no matter what side of the spectrum we are on involving topics of any sort, politics, religion, etc we all abuse each other, pick apart everything we say, etc. It isn't exclusive to Christian or Muslim, right-wing or left-wing.

I've seen many examples of left-wingers abusing right-wingers, and vice versa.

Aussie wrote on Sep 27^th, 2014 at 4:06pm:

freediver....there is an important PM waiting for you.  Please read and action ASAP.  Thanks.

PM - stands for private message.

You may not discuss it on a thread.

It's the same as Attorney–client privilege -  you should know that.

forgiven

namaste

Bobby. wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 9:06pm:

Aussie wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:06pm: freediver....there is an important PM waiting for you.  Please read and action ASAP.  Thanks. PM - stands for private message. You may not discuss it on a thread. It's the same as Attorney–client privilege -  you should know that. forgiven namaste

:D :D :D :D

You crack me up, Bobby.

Freedumb wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 9:11pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:06pm: Aussie wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:06pm: freediver....there is an important PM waiting for you.  Please read and action ASAP.  Thanks. PM - stands for private message. You may not discuss it on a thread. It's the same as Attorney–client privilege -  you should know that. forgiven namaste :D :D :D :D You crack me up, Bobby.

Thanks - Aussie claims to be a lawyer but I now have doubts.

Bobby. wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 9:17pm:

Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:11pm: Bobby. wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:06pm: Aussie wrote on Sep 27th, 2014 at 4:06pm: freediver....there is an important PM waiting for you.  Please read and action ASAP.  Thanks. PM - stands for private message. You may not discuss it on a thread. It's the same as Attorney–client privilege -  you should know that. forgiven namaste :D :D :D :D You crack me up, Bobby. Thanks - Aussie claims to be a lawyer but I now have doubts.

He could be a prostitute for all we know  ;)

No offence Aussie, just a joke.

It appears I've explained that wrong.

I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P

Freedumb wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 9:20pm:

He (Aussie) could be a prostitute for all we know.

I think you may be on to something :)

Freedumb wrote on Oct 7^th, 2014 at 9:25pm:

It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P

I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum...

we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;)

btw bobby PM.. mean personal message..

there goes that funny" personal" word again...

cods wrote on Oct 8^th, 2014 at 5:35am:

Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:25pm: It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum... we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;) btw bobby PM.. mean personal message.. there goes that funny" personal" word again...

Sorry but personal is still private.

namaste

Bobby. wrote on Oct 8^th, 2014 at 6:36am:

cods wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 5:35am: Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:25pm: It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum... we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;) btw bobby PM.. mean personal message.. there goes that funny" personal" word again... Sorry but personal is still private. namaste

your right of course..as always bobby!

cods wrote on Oct 8^th, 2014 at 5:35am:

Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:25pm: It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum... we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;) btw bobby PM.. mean personal message.. there goes that funny" personal" word again...

I'm notorious for that. I tend to link things together which makes me veer off all over the place.

Take the "personal abuse of me" thread, ended in a full blown debate about Aussie running for admin on PA  :D

Free, your **NICE** thread was a breath of fresh air in an otherwise frequently abrasive environment.  Thank you for your thoughts.   :)

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 8^th, 2014 at 3:23pm:

Free, your **NICE** thread was a breath of fresh air in an otherwise frequently abrasive environment.  Thank you for your thoughts.   :)

Any time  :)

Freedumb wrote on Oct 8^th, 2014 at 11:10am:

cods wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 5:35am: Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:25pm: It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum... we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;) btw bobby PM.. mean personal message.. there goes that funny" personal" word again... I'm notorious for that. I tend to link things together which makes me veer off all over the place. Take the "personal abuse of me" thread, ended in a full blown debate about Aussie running for admin on PA  :D

another thread on terrorists turned into a full blown rage against cods...how unusual.... ::) ::)

I really shouldnt be on this forum.. I seem to upset so many people.... trouble is I try to tell them to not bother reading me but they still do...and guess who gets blamed when I hit back.....

now I will be accused of complaining...poor me...

:'( :'( :'(.

pity we all have double standards isnt it?....I have yet to see a thread remain on topic beyond page 1..

cods wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 8:52am:

Freedumb wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 11:10am: cods wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 5:35am: Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:25pm: It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum... we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;) btw bobby PM.. mean personal message.. there goes that funny" personal" word again... I'm notorious for that. I tend to link things together which makes me veer off all over the place. Take the "personal abuse of me" thread, ended in a full blown debate about Aussie running for admin on PA  :D another thread on terrorists turned into a full blown rage against cods...how unusual.... ::) ::) I really shouldnt be on this forum.. I seem to upset so many people.... trouble is I try to tell them to not bother reading me but they still do...and guess who gets blamed when I hit back..... now I will be accused of complaining...poor me... :'( :'( :'(. pity we all have double standards isnt it?....I have yet to see a thread remain on topic beyond page 1..

Many people don't like honesty, especially if it that honesty goes against what they believe. The thing I like about you cods, is that you express an opinion from the heart and you don't feel the need to copy and paste from a website to back it up.

Freedumb wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 11:17am:

cods wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 8:52am: Freedumb wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 11:10am: cods wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 5:35am: Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:25pm: It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum... we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;) btw bobby PM.. mean personal message.. there goes that funny" personal" word again... I'm notorious for that. I tend to link things together which makes me veer off all over the place. Take the "personal abuse of me" thread, ended in a full blown debate about Aussie running for admin on PA  :D another thread on terrorists turned into a full blown rage against cods...how unusual.... ::) ::) I really shouldnt be on this forum.. I seem to upset so many people.... trouble is I try to tell them to not bother reading me but they still do...and guess who gets blamed when I hit back..... now I will be accused of complaining...poor me... :'( :'( :'(. pity we all have double standards isnt it?....I have yet to see a thread remain on topic beyond page 1.. Many people don't like honesty, especially if it that honesty goes against what they believe. The thing I like about you cods, is that you express an opinion from the heart and you don't feel the need to copy and paste from a website to back it up.

thanks free... why come on here if you are only expanding someone elses views.. some actually call that debate.. but I do  get carried away cant stand it when it comes to kids...I wont accept excuses.. to me anything that steals someones childhood is unforgivable..

I will learn.. there is hope ..

to accept others points of view..but I do find it interesting when people can fall about and PANIC over the threat of Ebola..

but the threat of beheading causes them mirth...

if you have the answer it would help..

Yes, I've noticed that some people don't believe the ISIS threat is real, and others don't believe the Ebola threat is real....

With me personally, I'm not stressed out about ISIS but I stay on my guard and keep an eye out. After all, you don't know who's out there, certain people could very well be helping the ISIS cause, it doesn't matter what town they are from, etc.

As for the Ebola thing, well I'm not panicking but if we as a country continue to be apathetic about it then it will spread here, because there are people from this country going over there to "help" then coming back. There should definitely be a quarantine process of some sort in place. Or better yet -- to the objection to the do-gooders -- stop people from going over there in the first place, as they are with the war torn middle eastern countries.

Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, in my opinion, they shouldn't be allowed freedom and civil rights -- the best place for paedophiles should be six feet under the ground. I have a good understanding of human nature, however my mind boggles at people who take pity on them.

Quote:

Paedophile sympathisers make me sick,

Define.

Aussie wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 5:04pm:

Quote: Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, Define.

well for me.. someone who is against a child sex offenders register!

they consider if they have served their time..they are entitled to go about their business..

I say for a mum with young children they are entitled to know they have a registered child sex offender in their midst,.

Aussie wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 5:04pm:

Quote: Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, Define.

People who support and defend the civil rights of a paedophile, basically.

cods wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 5:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:04pm: Quote: Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, Define. well for me.. someone who is against a child sex offenders register! they consider if they have served their time..they are entitled to go about their business.. I say for a mum with young children they are entitled to know they have a registered child sex offender in their midst,.

While we are at it....and for the same reason you offer about Mums with young children.....how about a public register of:

1.  Domestic violence offenders.
2.  People who have killed their spouse or one of their kids.
3.  Murderers in general,
4.  Break and enter wankers.
5.  Drink drivers.
6.  (Feel free to list your favourites ..... )

cods wrote on Oct 8^th, 2014 at 7:01am:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 6:36am: cods wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 5:35am: Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:25pm: It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum... we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;) btw bobby PM.. mean personal message.. there goes that funny" personal" word again... Sorry but personal is still private. namaste your right of course..as always bobby!

But Aussie ignored me & didn't apologise to the readers.

he is forgiven

namaste

Bobby. wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 5:25pm:

cods wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 7:01am: Bobby. wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 6:36am: cods wrote on Oct 8th, 2014 at 5:35am: Freedumb wrote on Oct 7th, 2014 at 9:25pm: It appears I've explained that wrong. I'll rephrase this completely: I've had many conversations with cods, and she isn't always saying "lefties ahahahahaha" or whatever it was  :P I think you are a bit like myself.. too logical for this forum... we can all be very selective when it suits....and of course change the topic... ;) ;) btw bobby PM.. mean personal message.. there goes that funny" personal" word again... Sorry but personal is still private. namaste your right of course..as always bobby! But Aussie ignored me & didn't apologise to the readers. he is forgiven namaste

I've obviously missed something, because I have no idea what Bobby is talking about?

He too is thus forgiven.

Aussie wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

cods wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:10pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:04pm: Quote: Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, Define. well for me.. someone who is against a child sex offenders register! they consider if they have served their time..they are entitled to go about their business.. I say for a mum with young children they are entitled to know they have a registered child sex offender in their midst,. While we are at it....and for the same reason you offer about Mums with young children.....how about a public register of: 1.  Domestic violence offenders. 2.  People who have killed their spouse or one of their kids. 3.  Murderers in general, 4.  Break and enter wankers. 5.  Drink drivers. 6.  (Feel free to list your favourites ..... )

ahhhha   do U suspect we have a paedo sympathiser amongst us...


PAEDOPHILE.. means CHILDREN...children are a gift and they need/deserve our protection..

they cannot defend themselves they do not know right from wrong they do not know their HUMAN RIGHTS..

PAEDOS are a whole section to themselves..

when you lump them with every other felon that saddens me......

in the perfect world there would be no reason to register anyone anyone at all....

but we dont live in a perfect world....

and to me children come first.. not some nasty adult who thinks they have certain rights over children..

cods wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 6:18pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:17pm: cods wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:10pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:04pm: Quote: Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, Define. well for me.. someone who is against a child sex offenders register! they consider if they have served their time..they are entitled to go about their business.. I say for a mum with young children they are entitled to know they have a registered child sex offender in their midst,. While we are at it....and for the same reason you offer about Mums with young children.....how about a public register of: 1.  Domestic violence offenders. 2.  People who have killed their spouse or one of their kids. 3.  Murderers in general, 4.  Break and enter wankers. 5.  Drink drivers. 6.  (Feel free to list your favourites ..... ) ahhhha   do U suspect we have a paedo sympathiser amongst us... PAEDOPHILE.. means CHILDREN...children are a gift and they need/deserve our protection.. they cannot defend themselves they do not know right from wrong they do not know their HUMAN RIGHTS.. PAEDOS are a whole section to themselves.. when you lump them with every other felon that saddens me...... in the perfect world there would be no reason to register anyone anyone at all.... but we dont live in a perfect world.... and to me children come first.. not some nasty adult who thinks they have certain rights over children..

Who is arguing against the concept that children come first cods, but why don't they deserve to be protected from:


1.  Domestic violence offenders.
2.  People who have killed their spouse or one of their kids.
3.  People who have assaulted kids violently.
4.  Murderers in general,
5.  Break and enter wankers.
6.  Drink drivers.
7.  (Feel free to list your favourites ..... )

.....as well?

paedos get what they're given: they get special treatment as an act of mercy!

B and E w******, as an example, are just your typical garden scum that wake up and eventually realise they don't want to be treated like 'the featherfoot' any longer and so behave extra good to shake the hoodoo..

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 8:30pm:

paedos get what they're given: they get special treatment as an act of mercy! B and E w******, as an example, are just your typical garden scum that wake up and eventually realise they don't want to be treated like 'the featherfoot' any longer and so behave extra good to shake the hoodoo..

Yer gonna have to dumb that down, Elde Horse.

Aussie wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 6:25pm:

cods wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 6:18pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:17pm: cods wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:10pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:04pm: Quote: Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, Define. well for me.. someone who is against a child sex offenders register! they consider if they have served their time..they are entitled to go about their business.. I say for a mum with young children they are entitled to know they have a registered child sex offender in their midst,. While we are at it....and for the same reason you offer about Mums with young children.....how about a public register of: 1.  Domestic violence offenders. 2.  People who have killed their spouse or one of their kids. 3.  Murderers in general, 4.  Break and enter wankers. 5.  Drink drivers. 6.  (Feel free to list your favourites ..... ) ahhhha   do U suspect we have a paedo sympathiser amongst us... PAEDOPHILE.. means CHILDREN...children are a gift and they need/deserve our protection.. they cannot defend themselves they do not know right from wrong they do not know their HUMAN RIGHTS.. PAEDOS are a whole section to themselves.. when you lump them with every other felon that saddens me...... in the perfect world there would be no reason to register anyone anyone at all.... but we dont live in a perfect world.... and to me children come first.. not some nasty adult who thinks they have certain rights over children.. Who is arguing against the concept that children come first cods, but why don't they deserve to be protected from: 1.  Domestic violence offenders. 2.  People who have killed their spouse or one of their kids. 3.  People who have assaulted kids violently. 4.  Murderers in general, 5.  Break and enter wankers. 6.  Drink drivers. 7.  (Feel free to list your favourites ..... ) .....as well?

stop twisting thing aussie and doing what you claim others do  change the topic...this is in answer to your QUESTION about paedos...no mention of the other list....

so stop trying to be smart it never works...

you asked the question remember???



Aussie wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 5:04pm:

Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, Define.

so now you answer mine..

are you a paedo sympathiser?????... if not why would you want a definition?????

I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser."

(You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.)

Aussie wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 8:53pm:

I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser." (You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.)

what did I fire at you..[PERSONALLY] just to set the record straight..

you asked a question....

and I answered it...but that could be hard for you to comprehend.... >:(

perhaps you can DEFINE>.. FIRE BACK

what did I fire back at you???>.

cods wrote on Oct 11^th, 2014 at 7:14am:

Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 8:53pm: I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser." (You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.) what did I fire at you..[PERSONALLY] just to set the record straight.. you asked a question.... and I answered it...but that could be hard for you to comprehend.... >:( perhaps you can DEFINE>.. FIRE BACK what did I fire back at you???>.

Comprehension is not one of Aussies strong points.

skippy. wrote on Oct 11^th, 2014 at 10:43am:

cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 7:14am: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 8:53pm: I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser." (You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.) what did I fire at you..[PERSONALLY] just to set the record straight.. you asked a question.... and I answered it...but that could be hard for you to comprehend.... >:( perhaps you can DEFINE>.. FIRE BACK what did I fire back at you???>. Comprehension is not one of Aussies strong points.

It seems misleading abuse may be one of yours.  I don't abuse you, and I'd appreciate reciprocation.

Aussie wrote on Oct 10^th, 2014 at 5:17pm:

cods wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:10pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 5:04pm: Quote: Paedophile sympathisers make me sick, Define. well for me.. someone who is against a child sex offenders register! they consider if they have served their time..they are entitled to go about their business.. I say for a mum with young children they are entitled to know they have a registered child sex offender in their midst,. While we are at it....and for the same reason you offer about Mums with young children.....how about a public register of: 1.  Domestic violence offenders. 2.  People who have killed their spouse or one of their kids. 3.  Murderers in general, 4.  Break and enter wankers. 5.  Drink drivers. 6.  (Feel free to list your favourites ..... )

7. Alcoholics

Aussie wrote on Oct 11^th, 2014 at 1:49pm:

skippy. wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 10:43am: cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 7:14am: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 8:53pm: I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser." (You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.) what did I fire at you..[PERSONALLY] just to set the record straight.. you asked a question.... and I answered it...but that could be hard for you to comprehend.... >:( perhaps you can DEFINE>.. FIRE BACK what did I fire back at you???>. Comprehension is not one of Aussies strong points. It seems misleading abuse may be one of yours.  I don't abuse you, and I'd appreciate reciprocation.

The truth is not abuse Aussie.

skippy. wrote on Oct 11^th, 2014 at 2:59pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 1:49pm: skippy. wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 10:43am: cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 7:14am: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 8:53pm: I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser." (You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.) what did I fire at you..[PERSONALLY] just to set the record straight.. you asked a question.... and I answered it...but that could be hard for you to comprehend.... >:( perhaps you can DEFINE>.. FIRE BACK what did I fire back at you???>. Comprehension is not one of Aussies strong points. It seems misleading abuse may be one of yours.  I don't abuse you, and I'd appreciate reciprocation. The truth is not abuse Aussie.

There are so many holes in that I'm not going to bother.  Whether you think it is true or otherwise, I am not going to allow any type of that PA pollution to creep in here. If you want to abuse (truth or otherwise) - do it there.  Not here.

Re: Important PM
Reply #28 - Yesterday at 5:10pm Quote Modify  Aussie wrote Yesterday at 5:04pm:
Quote:
Paedophile sympathisers make me sick,


Define.




well for me.. someone who is against a child sex offenders register!

they consider if they have served their time..they are entitled to go about their business..

I say for a mum with young children they are entitled to know they have a registered child sex offender in their midst,.




if you show me where exactly I abused you..

I will certainly apologise for it..

Aussie wrote on Oct 11^th, 2014 at 4:22pm:

skippy. wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 2:59pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 1:49pm: skippy. wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 10:43am: cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 7:14am: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 8:53pm: I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser." (You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.) what did I fire at you..[PERSONALLY] just to set the record straight.. you asked a question.... and I answered it...but that could be hard for you to comprehend.... >:( perhaps you can DEFINE>.. FIRE BACK what did I fire back at you???>. Comprehension is not one of Aussies strong points. It seems misleading abuse may be one of yours.  I don't abuse you, and I'd appreciate reciprocation. The truth is not abuse Aussie. There are so many holes in that I'm not going to bother.  Whether you think it is true or otherwise, I am not going to allow any type of that PA pollution to creep in here. If you want to abuse (truth or otherwise) - do it there.  Not here.

How is posting the obvious abuse Einstein?

Aussie wrote on Oct 11^th, 2014 at 1:49pm:

skippy. wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 10:43am: cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 7:14am: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 8:53pm: I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser." (You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.) what did I fire at you..[PERSONALLY] just to set the record straight.. you asked a question.... and I answered it...but that could be hard for you to comprehend.... >:( perhaps you can DEFINE>.. FIRE BACK what did I fire back at you???>. Comprehension is not one of Aussies strong points. It seems misleading abuse may be one of yours.  I don't abuse you, and I'd appreciate reciprocation.

MISLEADING WELL I HAVE PRINTED IT UP..


show me the ABUSE...

you didnt like my reply.

so you come back with a list to make yourself look better......hahahahaha.. its only ok if aussie DOES it..

you think comments like..


I doubt you will realise that...

is not putting someone down... ::)

thats why I come back with your comprehension is weak..

seams like you are one of these people that reads what they think the person has written.. you do it all the time when you try to wriggle off the hook..

Aussie wrote on Oct 11^th, 2014 at 4:22pm:

skippy. wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 2:59pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 1:49pm: skippy. wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 10:43am: cods wrote on Oct 11th, 2014 at 7:14am: Aussie wrote on Oct 10th, 2014 at 8:53pm: I want to know what Freedumb describes as a "paedophile sympathiser." (You got in the way.....and I gave you back what you fired at me......but I doubt you'll realise that.) what did I fire at you..[PERSONALLY] just to set the record straight.. you asked a question.... and I answered it...but that could be hard for you to comprehend.... >:( perhaps you can DEFINE>.. FIRE BACK what did I fire back at you???>. Comprehension is not one of Aussies strong points. It seems misleading abuse may be one of yours.  I don't abuse you, and I'd appreciate reciprocation. The truth is not abuse Aussie. There are so many holes in that I'm not going to bother.  Whether you think it is true or otherwise, I am not going to allow any type of that PA pollution to creep in here. If you want to abuse (truth or otherwise) - do it there.  Not here.

here we go.. I was going to say now watch for the great PA blast.... but you beat me to it..

it doesnt make anyone take their eye off the ball aussie..

so explain the MISLEADING ABUSE to me...

and while you are at it..

explain why

"I doubt you will realise that".

isnt abuse.

as you use those snide put downs...any old time you are on the back foot..