She dogged him

I told you she was is and always a dog

Maqqa wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 6:54pm:

She dogged him I told you she was is and always a dog

Well, well, well, God is back?

As th saying goes, "God is great" ?

Hello & welcome back, God!

Oh & I hope you enjoyed your long holiday.

offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse.


Gillard was much better than rudd.

At least she didn't invade Iraq causing today's worldwide terrorist threat ...yep....we have Howard to thank for that little gem  :D

Looks like macca's escaped again.

;)

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:04pm:

offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd.

not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none.

I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd.

No, she's not. She may be just another self-serving political hack who saw and was handed the easy way to a sweet retirement at the expense of others... but she is not a dog.

She is simply what most of them are.... and the entire discussion would be far better served by discussing how we can cut out this style of political hack from any access to power and our money.

Go your way in peace, Julia... and I'll see you on the beach....

Hooray for Rudd/Gillard/Rudd withdrawing troops from Afghanistan during their 6 years in office. ::) ::) ::)

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:44pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd.

What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher.

jockohomo3d wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 8:16pm:

Hooray for Rudd/Gillard/Rudd withdrawing troops from Afghanistan during their 6 years in office. ::) ::) ::)

Only to have the sent back once LNP got back in.

I was being ironic. (Right adelcrow?)

adelcrow wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:24pm:

At least she didn't invade Iraq causing today's worldwide terrorist threat ...yep....we have Howard to thank for that little gem  :D

Neither of the Iraq wars caused the threat posed by ISIL. They were borne out of their struggle against the Assad regime in Syria and have nothing whatsoever to do with either Iraq war. If you bothered to read, you'd know that.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 8:31pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher.

It's an allegation with no proof and not a single person prepared to swear on record that it supposedly happened, as there are harsh penalties for making false claims. Time to stop flogging this dead horse...

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 8:31pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher.

well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply. 

Gumpy ... your back? Where've you been?

I guess now that Abbott is in govt. he doesn't want to pay you per post anymore ... I see you've still got a hard on for Gillard ;D ;D ;D

Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21^st, 2014 at 7:04pm:

offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd.

hear hear...I dont like Abbott being called a maggot and I dont like Gillard being called a dog...

they are both PM.. one is now an ex...makes no difference have some respect for the office. for gods sake.

cods wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:16am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. hear hear...I dont like Abbott being called a maggot and I dont like Gillard being called a dog... they are both PM.. one is now an ex...makes no difference have some respect for the office. for gods sake.

Agreed. What she did can be called a "dog act" but she isn't a dog. She's incompetent, an appalling lawyer and one of the most sexist people I've ever seen in public life, but it's not right to call her a dog.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:16am:

Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple.

I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????..

the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...

  but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts.

cods wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:20am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts.

I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D

cods wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:20am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts.

Two small breasts and a big red box. You never saw that, cods? Rather doubt that. Then the numerous references to her “big bum” which you must have seen some of. Then the numerous mentions her ear lobes(!) were wrong, her hair crap, her jackets wrong etc etc.

When you post crap like that, cods, you paint yourself as an unthinking Lib fanboi/gurl. That is why no one believes your posts and mocks them.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:23am:

cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D

Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised?

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:27am:

cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. Two small breasts and a big red box. You never saw that, cods? Rather doubt that. Then the numerous references to her “big bum” which you must have seen some of. Then the numerous mentions her ear lobes(!) were wrong, her hair crap, her jackets wrong etc etc. When you post crap like that, cods, you paint yourself as an unthinking Lib fanboi/gurl. That is why no one believes your posts and mocks them.

was this in PARLIAMENT>. or just on the dear dorothy dix  forums you engage on.. I do not recal her being referred to in that manner in parliament...

perhaps you can post a link... and I will retract MY CRAP...

if all pollies cried in parliament about what cartoonists do to them... then god help us all.

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:29am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised?

Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:29am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised?

so mentioning gillard.jacket is a No No but claiming men in BLUE TIES. :D :D. isnt MISANDRY...

So I reminded you of some of the sexist comment directed towards Gillard?

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D

to my knowledge gillard is the only female in a high position that has ever waved that flag....'shudder

and still they think the poor dear was picked on.. what a shame they will never grow up...lets see if St Geo can come up with a link to where she was abused in Parliament...by men in blue ties...

in fact I think Bishop gave her more of a serve... ::) ::)

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:38am:

So I reminded you of some of the sexist comment directed towards Gillard?

no darling... where were these done in parliament which is what she was talking about.. she even pointed that rude finger at Tony.. come on...where did he mention her BUM??..

you worry too much about what is said in a forum like this and even think gillard reads it.. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

No, all sorts of people in and out of parliament attached Gillard on her gender.

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:42am:

No, all sorts of people in and out of parliament attached Gillard on her gender.

THATS WHAT YOU KEEP SAYING..

ALL I WANT TO SEE IS WHERE SHE WAS ATTACKED IN PARLIAMENT FOR BEING FEMALE??..

they put themselves out there and they have to take what people outside do and say.. thats life.. look whats been  said about any Lib PM>.

where was she attacked INSIDE PARLIAMENT under the free shot they get there?????>..

come on you must have something..

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D

why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika?

A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you!

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 6:54am:

adelcrow wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:24pm: At least she didn't invade Iraq causing today's worldwide terrorist threat ...yep....we have Howard to thank for that little gem  :D Neither of the Iraq wars caused the threat posed by ISIL. They were borne out of their struggle against the Assad regime in Syria and have nothing whatsoever to do with either Iraq war. If you bothered to read, you'd know that.

And if you bothered to think.........................what's the point.

Yes you're right Teaspoon, The Tele told you so.

John Smith wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 9:11am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you!

So because Juliar Gillard said men who wear blue ties are a misogynist, it is so? End of discussion, eh? You're so funny!  ;D ;D ;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 9:49am:

John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:11am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you! So because Juliar Gillard said men who wear blue ties are a misogynist, it is so? End of discussion, eh? You're so funny!  ;D ;D ;D

end of discussion? no, you can discuss the symbolism all you like ... just don't pretend it doesn't exist

A blue tie in parliament now means much more than just a blue tie

but lets face it, symbolism is far to complicated for you

Take a look at yourselves.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsECK-gRCGc

::) ::) ::)

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:34am:

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D

blue ties are very common for pollies because they photograph well and don't go weird on TV.  take a good look.  MOST wear them and that is the reason why.  it was one of Gillards sillier statements.

cods wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 9:07am:

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:42am: No, all sorts of people in and out of parliament attached Gillard on her gender. THATS WHAT YOU KEEP SAYING.. ALL I WANT TO SEE IS WHERE SHE WAS ATTACKED IN PARLIAMENT FOR BEING FEMALE??.. they put themselves out there and they have to take what people outside do and say.. thats life.. look whats been  said about any Lib PM>. where was she attacked INSIDE PARLIAMENT under the free shot they get there?????>.. come on you must have something..

boofheads like gerorge (and Gillard) confuse attacks with sexism.  Howard was subject to the most appalling abuse by lefities during his term and far, far worse than Gillard was and indeed so was Rudd.  Gillard actually got off lightly but being the dope she is, EVERY attack was sexist.

She set the agenda of women in the ALP back 20 years.

John Smith wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 9:11am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you!

a claim by a think-skinned woman does not automatically make it true.  a blue tie has been worn for decades by MPs on all sides.  it means nothing and still means nothing.  it is just a tie.  after her idiotic statement, the men in her own party showed up at a press conference wearing... blue ties.  and it was not a protest. it was what they and everyone else wore. and still do.

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 11:57am:

Take a look at yourselves..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsECK-gRCGc ::) ::) ::)

is that in any way unique in our history of PMs?  can you even find a PM that was treated MORE respectfully than she was?

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 11:57am:

Take a look at yourselves..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsECK-gRCGc ::) ::) ::)

funny how they don't recall any of that ......... :-/ :-/

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:01pm:

cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:07am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:42am: No, all sorts of people in and out of parliament attached Gillard on her gender. THATS WHAT YOU KEEP SAYING.. ALL I WANT TO SEE IS WHERE SHE WAS ATTACKED IN PARLIAMENT FOR BEING FEMALE??.. they put themselves out there and they have to take what people outside do and say.. thats life.. look whats been  said about any Lib PM>. where was she attacked INSIDE PARLIAMENT under the free shot they get there?????>.. come on you must have something.. boofheads like gerorge (and Gillard) confuse attacks with sexism.  Howard was subject to the most appalling abuse by lefities during his term and far, far worse than Gillard was and indeed so was Rudd.  Gillard actually got off lightly but being the dope she is, EVERY attack was sexist. She set the agenda of women in the ALP back 20 years.

Correction: the ALP set the agenda of women in the ALP (and everywhere) back at least 20 years with the institution of their ridiculous quota. Can there be any bigger slap in the face to womens' fight for equality than the fact that they can only get a position in the ALP because of a quota rather than through simply being the right person for the job?

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 9:49am:

John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:11am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you! So because Juliar Gillard said men who wear blue ties are a misogynist, it is so? End of discussion, eh? You're so funny!  ;D ;D ;D

You actually don’t know what Gillard said about men wearing blue ties? Why are you on a political board? Regurgitating Tele articles I suppose.

For a clue—watch her misogyny speech.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:04pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:11am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you! a claim by a think-skinned woman does not automatically make it true.  a blue tie has been worn for decades by MPs on all sides.  it means nothing and still means nothing.  it is just a tie.  after her idiotic statement, the men in her own party showed up at a press conference wearing... blue ties.  and it was not a protest. it was what they and everyone else wore. and still do.

the veracity of the claim in itself is now irrelevant ... the fact remains that she made it, blue ties are now, and for the forseeable future a symbol of that claim.

John Smith wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:08pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:04pm: John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:11am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you! a claim by a think-skinned woman does not automatically make it true.  a blue tie has been worn for decades by MPs on all sides.  it means nothing and still means nothing.  it is just a tie.  after her idiotic statement, the men in her own party showed up at a press conference wearing... blue ties.  and it was not a protest. it was what they and everyone else wore. and still do. the veracity of the claim in itself is now irrelevant ... the fact remains that she made it, blue ties are now, and for the forseeable future a symbol of that claim.

Only if you believe her and I'd wager that the VAST majority of men out there think she's stark-raving mad on that front.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:08pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:04pm: John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:11am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you! a claim by a think-skinned woman does not automatically make it true.  a blue tie has been worn for decades by MPs on all sides.  it means nothing and still means nothing.  it is just a tie.  after her idiotic statement, the men in her own party showed up at a press conference wearing... blue ties.  and it was not a protest. it was what they and everyone else wore. and still do. the veracity of the claim in itself is now irrelevant ... the fact remains that she made it, blue ties are now, and for the forseeable future a symbol of that claim. Only if you believe her and I'd wager that the VAST majority of men out there think she's stark-raving mad on that front.

you don't have to believe her to reconginse the symbolism .. many people claim the genocide of the Jews was a fabricated lie, but they don't deny the symbolism of the swastika

Another form of disrespect to PM Gillard was the use of her name without the prefix “PM” in most news media, including the now right wing ABC.

John Smith wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:06pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 11:57am: Take a look at yourselves..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsECK-gRCGc ::) ::) ::) funny how they don't recall any of that ......... :-/ :-/

I doubt any of the right wing protagonists would watch the video John.....Ignorance is bliss to some people!!!

::) ::) ::)

Ignorance gives one a large range of probabilities.
George Eliot (1819 - 1880)

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:08pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:04pm: John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:11am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you! a claim by a think-skinned woman does not automatically make it true.  a blue tie has been worn for decades by MPs on all sides.  it means nothing and still means nothing.  it is just a tie.  after her idiotic statement, the men in her own party showed up at a press conference wearing... blue ties.  and it was not a protest. it was what they and everyone else wore. and still do. the veracity of the claim in itself is now irrelevant ... the fact remains that she made it, blue ties are now, and for the forseeable future a symbol of that claim. Only if you believe her and I'd wager that the VAST majority of men out there think she's stark-raving mad on that front.

Yeah, she over egged the blue tie thing at that address to women, hoping to surf a wave of confected misogyny to popularity.  Spectacular fail. 

John Smith wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:08pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:04pm: John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:11am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you! a claim by a think-skinned woman does not automatically make it true.  a blue tie has been worn for decades by MPs on all sides.  it means nothing and still means nothing.  it is just a tie.  after her idiotic statement, the men in her own party showed up at a press conference wearing... blue ties.  and it was not a protest. it was what they and everyone else wore. and still do. the veracity of the claim in itself is now irrelevant ... the fact remains that she made it, blue ties are now, and for the forseeable future a symbol of that claim.

not even remotely true.  people have largely forgotten it and the rest simply ignore it as bing a stupid claim made by a rather petty person.  pollies everywhere where the ties they want to and for reasons previously mentioned, are usually blue.  Gillard is gone, her misandry gone and her hysterical 'I am woman, watch me whine' theme also gone.

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:18pm:

Another form of disrespect to PM Gillard was the use of her name without the prefix “PM” in most news media, including the now right wing ABC.

you mean how they referred to Hawke Keating Rudd Howard and Abbott???

grow up.

No, now we hear “Prime Minister Tony Abbott” but that courtesy was largely denied to PM Gillard.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:05am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.

Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading. 

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:16am:

Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple.

Why do you feel she was a failure?  Define the qualifiers you are using.

When you consider the 600 pieces of legislation PM Gillard was able to get through both Houses, including reforms like the Carbon Price and Minerals Resource Rent Tax you just cannot say she was a failure.

Then you look at the present shambles, Budget in tatters, half the Budget Bills not introduced yet 5 months after the Budget, some just never to be presented—there you have a failure as PM!

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 1:05pm:

When you consider the 600 pieces of legislation PM Gillard was able to get through both Houses, including reforms like the Carbon Price and Minerals Resource Rent Tax you just cannot say she was a failure. Then you look at the present shambles, Budget in tatters, half the Budget Bills not introduced yet 5 months after the Budget, some just never to be presented—there you have a failure as PM!

hence I'm trying to understnad the qaulifiers our dumb rightwing fwends are trying to use to classify her as a failure.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:53pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:08pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:04pm: John Smith wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 9:11am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D why don't you walk through a jewish town wearing a swastika? A blue tie, because of her speach, has meaning and is not just a blue tie... no surprise that that was beyond you! a claim by a think-skinned woman does not automatically make it true.  a blue tie has been worn for decades by MPs on all sides.  it means nothing and still means nothing.  it is just a tie.  after her idiotic statement, the men in her own party showed up at a press conference wearing... blue ties.  and it was not a protest. it was what they and everyone else wore. and still do. the veracity of the claim in itself is now irrelevant ... the fact remains that she made it, blue ties are now, and for the forseeable future a symbol of that claim. not even remotely true.  people have largely forgotten it and the rest simply ignore it as bing a stupid claim made by a rather petty person.  pollies everywhere where the ties they want to and for reasons previously mentioned, are usually blue.  Gillard is gone, her misandry gone and her hysterical 'I am woman, watch me whine' theme also gone.

if people had largely forgotten it, why does it continue to come up?   :D :D :D :D

Gillard never whined! Poise and grace under pressure was her hallmark.

Just because rightwingers take a party line and maybe don’t like the reforms doesn’t mean Gillard didn’t legislate those reforms and so must be judged as successful.

By contrast we have Abbott, action on the RET needed either to keep it or rescind it but he seems to have forgotten it doing the macho man security rubbish. This means the renewables industry doesn’t know if they have a future or not. With the economy declining rapidly uncertainty is something we cannot afford.

But Abbott lives to fight, to divide, has forgotten the RET!

Gillard the Dog

Another title typical of the conservatives standards here but just watch them cry if anyone has a negative word against lord Tony the XXXX.

Gillard the Dog

Even her critics rate her in front of Tony Abbott - nobody would make as nice a comment about him.

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:58pm:

No, now we hear “Prime Minister Tony Abbott” but that courtesy was largely denied to PM Gillard.

you are such a stupid cretin.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 12:59pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.  Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading.

While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description.  How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!!

perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word.  that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 1:32pm:

St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 1:05pm: When you consider the 600 pieces of legislation PM Gillard was able to get through both Houses, including reforms like the Carbon Price and Minerals Resource Rent Tax you just cannot say she was a failure. Then you look at the present shambles, Budget in tatters, half the Budget Bills not introduced yet 5 months after the Budget, some just never to be presented—there you have a failure as PM! hence I'm trying to understnad the qaulifiers our dumb rightwing fwends are trying to use to classify her as a failure.

well given your epic misunderstanding of misogyny do we assume you don't know the meaning of 'failure' as well?

cods wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 8:40am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:34am: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:29am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:23am: cods wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:20am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:16am: Watching the women on the "The Grill" segment on the Today Show on Nine defend Gillard. Highly amusing that they say she was targeted because she was a women when everyone else knows she was targeted because she was simply a failure as PM regardless of her gender. She used her gender as an excuse, plain and simple. I dont recall all this TARGETING they refer too.. was it any worse than any other PM.?????.. the worst thing she did was bring in the poor me its all because I am a female..crap...I only watched Howard for about 10 min and when they showed her making her infamous speech even those behind her looked uncomfortable.. even she would have to see that...   but its done and dusted they all make mistakes..its owning them that counts. I did notice that on Abbott's first day as PM, he was wearing a blue tie. A back-hander aimed at Gillard and her misogyny rant? Maybe!  ;D Armpit approves of misogyny? Why am I not surprised? Wearing a blue tie is an act of misogyny now? LMAO!!!!  ;D ;D ;D to my knowledge gillard is the only female in a high position that has ever waved that flag....'shudder and still they think the poor dear was picked on.. what a shame they will never grow up...lets see if St Geo can come up with a link to where she was abused in Parliament...by men in blue ties... in fact I think Bishop gave her more of a serve... ::) ::)

Yes, Gillard didn't realise till after Bishop sat down, she had been told with a nose like that she should have been a pelican!

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 2:56pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:59pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.  Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading.  While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description.  How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!! perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word.  that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown.

That's simple: you suggest women don't possess necessary qualities to be leaders. And by being disparaging to men by way of calling them women, you suggest that it's in someway bad to be a woman.

Bloody misogynist! 

Ps: I don't think anyone who worships mythical creatures can call others stupid ;D

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 2:57pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 1:32pm: St George of the Garden wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 1:05pm: When you consider the 600 pieces of legislation PM Gillard was able to get through both Houses, including reforms like the Carbon Price and Minerals Resource Rent Tax you just cannot say she was a failure. Then you look at the present shambles, Budget in tatters, half the Budget Bills not introduced yet 5 months after the Budget, some just never to be presented—there you have a failure as PM! hence I'm trying to understnad the qaulifiers our dumb rightwing fwends are trying to use to classify her as a failure. well given your epic misunderstanding of misogyny do we assume you don't know the meaning of 'failure' as well?

So you don't know what these qualifiers are? 

Dnarever wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 2:04pm:

Gillard the Dog Another title typical of the conservatives standards here but just watch them cry if anyone has a negative word against lord Tony the XXXX.

to be fair, 'dog' is far better than what most posters call Abbott on here every day.  I object to calling the former PM that and you will note that I never have, but it would be nice if the consideration was extended to Abbott.

But we know what will happen with that request for a non-hypocritical style, don't we?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 3:40pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:56pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:59pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.  Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading.  While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description.  How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!! perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word.  that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown. That's simple: you suggest women don't possess necessary qualities to be leaders. And by being disparaging to men by way of calling them women, you suggest that it's in someway bad to be a woman. Bloody misogynist!  Ps: I don't think anyone who worships mythical creatures can call others stupid ;D

that's the most idiotic line of thinking Ive heard from you on basically any topic. first you start with a bald-faced lie (women don't have what it takes to be leaders) that I have never said and certainly didn't say in this thread. then you extrapolate Kevin Rudd to 'all men' and then imply something that was never stated in any shape, form or hint.

using your logic I can misinterpret anything you say to be a pro-communist, putin loving, 5th columnist pack of lies.

I can construct an argument as equally invalid as yours to support it.]

DUMB AS...

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:04pm: Gillard the Dog Another title typical of the conservatives standards here but just watch them cry if anyone has a negative word against lord Tony the XXXX. to be fair, 'dog' is far better than what most posters call Abbott on here every day.  I object to calling the former PM that and you will note that I never have, but it would be nice if the consideration was extended to Abbott. But we know what will happen with that request for a non-hypocritical style, don't we?

After 6 years of Juliar, ditch the witch, krudd etc the horse has rather bolted.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 4:51pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 3:40pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:56pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:59pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.  Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading.  While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description.  How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!! perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word.  that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown. That's simple: you suggest women don't possess necessary qualities to be leaders. And by being disparaging to men by way of calling them women, you suggest that it's in someway bad to be a woman. Bloody misogynist!  Ps: I don't think anyone who worships mythical creatures can call others stupid ;D that's the most idiotic line of thinking Ive heard from you on basically any topic. first you start with a bald-faced lie (women don't have what it takes to be leaders) that I have never said and certainly didn't say in this thread. then you extrapolate Kevin Rudd to 'all men' and then imply something that was never stated in any shape, form or hint. using your logic I can misinterpret anything you say to be a pro-communist, putin loving, 5th columnist pack of lies. I can construct an argument as equally invalid as yours to support it.] DUMB AS...

did you not say you tried to disparage Rudd? You did that by saying he was our first women leader as he had no balls. Work out now how it's very easy to extrapolate what you mean, you misogynist!   

Gotta ask yourself...would jebus be proud?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 4:57pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 4:51pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 3:40pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:56pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:59pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.  Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading.  While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description.  How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!! perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word.  that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown. That's simple: you suggest women don't possess necessary qualities to be leaders. And by being disparaging to men by way of calling them women, you suggest that it's in someway bad to be a woman. Bloody misogynist!  Ps: I don't think anyone who worships mythical creatures can call others stupid ;D that's the most idiotic line of thinking Ive heard from you on basically any topic. first you start with a bald-faced lie (women don't have what it takes to be leaders) that I have never said and certainly didn't say in this thread. then you extrapolate Kevin Rudd to 'all men' and then imply something that was never stated in any shape, form or hint. using your logic I can misinterpret anything you say to be a pro-communist, putin loving, 5th columnist pack of lies. I can construct an argument as equally invalid as yours to support it.] DUMB AS... did you not say you tried to disparage Rudd? You did that by saying he was our first women leader as he had no balls. Work out now how it's very easy to extrapolate what you mean, you misogynist!    Gotta ask yourself...would jebus be proud?

I am still surprised at how you can so deliberately misinterpret a statement that has zero reference to Gillard into one about her.  It was a rather obviously slight on Rudd or is the familiar phrase 'you hit like a girl' a sideways attack on Gillard too... coz it was in used years before she was born.

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 5:53pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 4:57pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 4:51pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 3:40pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:56pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:59pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.  Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading.  While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description.  How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!! perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word.  that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown. That's simple: you suggest women don't possess necessary qualities to be leaders. And by being disparaging to men by way of calling them women, you suggest that it's in someway bad to be a woman. Bloody misogynist!  Ps: I don't think anyone who worships mythical creatures can call others stupid ;D that's the most idiotic line of thinking Ive heard from you on basically any topic. first you start with a bald-faced lie (women don't have what it takes to be leaders) that I have never said and certainly didn't say in this thread. then you extrapolate Kevin Rudd to 'all men' and then imply something that was never stated in any shape, form or hint. using your logic I can misinterpret anything you say to be a pro-communist, putin loving, 5th columnist pack of lies. I can construct an argument as equally invalid as yours to support it.] DUMB AS... did you not say you tried to disparage Rudd? You did that by saying he was our first women leader as he had no balls. Work out now how it's very easy to extrapolate what you mean, you misogynist!    Gotta ask yourself...would jebus be proud? I am still surprised at how you can so deliberately misinterpret a statement that has zero reference to Gillard into one about her.  It was a rather obviously slight on Rudd or is the familiar phrase 'you hit like a girl' a sideways attack on Gillard too... coz it was in used years before she was born.

wtf you on about? When did I say it was an attack on Gillard? I said that by suggesting you can disparage a male by suggesting they are female is inadvertently misogynistic because you're suggesting somehow it's bad to be a female, as opposed to a male. Not to mention that you suggest good leadership involves having characteristics only a male has, and because Rudd "didn't" have them it must mean he was a woman, hence bad.

You see longie? Watch what you say.  It wasnt' funny, it was rather juvenile. And in that juvenile moment you got yourself caught out being the same type of sexist pig that your lover boy Tony is.

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 4:57pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 4:51pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 3:40pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:56pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:59pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.  Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading.  While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description.  How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!! perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word.  that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown. That's simple: you suggest women don't possess necessary qualities to be leaders. And by being disparaging to men by way of calling them women, you suggest that it's in someway bad to be a woman. Bloody misogynist!  Ps: I don't think anyone who worships mythical creatures can call others stupid ;D that's the most idiotic line of thinking Ive heard from you on basically any topic. first you start with a bald-faced lie (women don't have what it takes to be leaders) that I have never said and certainly didn't say in this thread. then you extrapolate Kevin Rudd to 'all men' and then imply something that was never stated in any shape, form or hint. using your logic I can misinterpret anything you say to be a pro-communist, putin loving, 5th columnist pack of lies. I can construct an argument as equally invalid as yours to support it.] DUMB AS... did you not say you tried to disparage Rudd? You did that by saying he was our first women leader as he had no balls. Work out now how it's very easy to extrapolate what you mean, you misogynist!    Gotta ask yourself...would jebus be proud?

Jebus would not be happy with armpit at all, throwing around personal insults, isn't that one of the ten fairy tales armpit, thou shall not use personal insults, admit you're a false prophet and god is a superstition, because a proper christian wouldn't conduct himself in your manner .

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 4:47pm:

Dnarever wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:04pm: Gillard the Dog Another title typical of the conservatives standards here but just watch them cry if anyone has a negative word against lord Tony the XXXX. to be fair, 'dog' is far better than what most posters call Abbott on here every day.  I object to calling the former PM that and you will note that I never have, but it would be nice if the consideration was extended to Abbott. But we know what will happen with that request for a non-hypocritical style, don't we?

at least I do see where righties object to this thread... but have never seen where a lefty objects to Abbott being called a maggot or a murderer...

and even a paedo....funny that.. >:(

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FnmUR1t-mZc/0.jpg

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 5:57pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 5:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 4:57pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 4:51pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 3:40pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:56pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 12:59pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 8:05am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 8:31pm: longweekend58 wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:44pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 21st, 2014 at 7:04pm: offensive thread.   I dislike personal abuse. Gillard was much better than rudd. not reall a challenge though, was it?  all you had to be was to have an ego smaller than a planet, competence larger than a grain of sand and a set of balls since he had none. I still think the ALPs first woman leader was Kevin Rudd. What a misogynistic reply.  No wonder you love the woman basher. well of all the comments that could have been made, 'misogyny' wasn't the most expected. congratulations on a near worthless reply.  Definitely misogynistic. You clearly don't believe women are capable of leading.  While I disagree with you a lot Ive not usually considered you stupid, but this reply definitely fits the description.  How on any plane of existence can it be misogynist to refer disparagingly to a MAN!!! perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word.  that's the only explanation that has you not looking like a clown. That's simple: you suggest women don't possess necessary qualities to be leaders. And by being disparaging to men by way of calling them women, you suggest that it's in someway bad to be a woman. Bloody misogynist!  Ps: I don't think anyone who worships mythical creatures can call others stupid ;D that's the most idiotic line of thinking Ive heard from you on basically any topic. first you start with a bald-faced lie (women don't have what it takes to be leaders) that I have never said and certainly didn't say in this thread. then you extrapolate Kevin Rudd to 'all men' and then imply something that was never stated in any shape, form or hint. using your logic I can misinterpret anything you say to be a pro-communist, putin loving, 5th columnist pack of lies. I can construct an argument as equally invalid as yours to support it.] DUMB AS... did you not say you tried to disparage Rudd? You did that by saying he was our first women leader as he had no balls. Work out now how it's very easy to extrapolate what you mean, you misogynist!    Gotta ask yourself...would jebus be proud? I am still surprised at how you can so deliberately misinterpret a statement that has zero reference to Gillard into one about her.  It was a rather obviously slight on Rudd or is the familiar phrase 'you hit like a girl' a sideways attack on Gillard too... coz it was in used years before she was born. wtf you on about? When did I say it was an attack on Gillard? I said that by suggesting you can disparage a male by suggesting they are female is inadvertently misogynistic because you're suggesting somehow it's bad to be a female, as opposed to a male. Not to mention that you suggest good leadership involves having characteristics only a male has, and because Rudd "didn't" have them it must mean he was a woman, hence bad. You see longie? Watch what you say.  It wasnt' funny, it was rather juvenile. And in that juvenile moment you got yourself caught out being the same type of sexist pig that your lover boy Tony is.

'you hit like a girl' has been part of the aussie lexicon for a century or more.  if you don't understand that then that is kinda your problem.  I'm sure I don't understand Russian idioms or slan either but then again  I am not presuming to.

Oh - stop acting like sheilas here and get on to the subject matter.....

Julia is no more of a dog than any other politician...... and I defend whole-heartedly her right to sleep with the pigs!

Misandrist doesn't quite have the sting of 'misogynist' (one of the West's most abused words, BTW)..

I prefer Misandwichist (n).... one who refuses the boys beer and sandwiches on grand final day....

cods wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2014 at 6:14pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 4:47pm: Dnarever wrote on Sep 22nd, 2014 at 2:04pm: Gillard the Dog Another title typical of the conservatives standards here but just watch them cry if anyone has a negative word against lord Tony the XXXX. to be fair, 'dog' is far better than what most posters call Abbott on here every day.  I object to calling the former PM that and you will note that I never have, but it would be nice if the consideration was extended to Abbott. But we know what will happen with that request for a non-hypocritical style, don't we? at least I do see where righties object to this thread... but have never seen where a lefty objects to Abbott being called a maggot or a murderer... and even a paedo....funny that.. >:(

Quote:

at least I do see where righties object to this thread

I must have missed that post.


Quote:

have never seen where a lefty objects to Abbott being called a maggot or a murderer...

I do not feel it would be appropriate to call Abbott a murderer and I would not personally call him a maggot either as I am not sure which genus or type of genera would be most appropriate.