What a fail by the self appointed higher than though

Laughable new paper claims 99.999% certainty global warming over past 25 years is man-made

According to the authors,

“
“there is less than a one in one hundred thousand chance of observing an unbroken sequence of 304 months [25.3 years] (our analysis extends to June 2010) with mean surface temperature exceeding the 20th century average.”

Fundamental problems with this claim [which is basically the falsified IPCC attribution claim of 95% certainty on steroids] include:

Ummmm Problem cooook
There is no statistical difference between the rate of warming over the 27 years from 1917-1944 and the 25 years from 1975/1976 to 2000:

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/twowarmingperiods_compared.jpg

And more. What a #!@#%
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/09/03/laughable-new-paper-claims-99-999-certainty-global-warming-over-past-25-years-is-man-made/

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/07/inside-the-skeptical-science-secret-tree-house-bunker/

;D ;D ;D Anthony watts

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 11^th, 2014 at 10:56pm:

;D ;D ;D Anthony watts

Thanks for verifying that Anthony Watts has won the argument. It could be an oversight of yours, so ill give you a chance to nullify that graph compare to the message cooks is trying on in his paper.

Skeptical science view - The escalator

http://www.skepticalscience.com/graphics/Escalator_2012_500.gif

Kevin Trenberth view - "big jumps"

http://www.rmets.org/sites/rmets.org/files/content_images/weather/trenberth-gwt.jpg

'But at each end of these periods there were big jumps.'

http://www.rmets.org/weather-and-climate/climate/has-global-warming-stalled

See the similarities?

Seems SKS can get it right - even if for the wrong reasons.

Unless you believe the cartoonist above the climate scientist. Or maybe Trenberth has become a closet "skeptic"?