One man wrecking ball. Stay clear everyone!!!

not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D

John Smith wrote on Jul 25^th, 2014 at 11:25pm:

not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D

Lol john that's funny.

John Smith wrote on Jul 25^th, 2014 at 11:25pm:

not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D

Nearly his marriage. Keep it in ya pants Billy!!!

labor are corrupt wrote on Jul 25^th, 2014 at 11:27pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 11:25pm: not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D Lol john that's funny.

of course it is ... it's also true.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 25^th, 2014 at 11:28pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 11:25pm: not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D Nearly his marriage. Keep it in ya pants Billy!!!

you should worry about your marriage and leave Bills pants to Bill

I told you before, this is not a pick up site.

who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as.

the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 12:44pm:

who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as. the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at.

Yes a very poor leader.  Irritating to listen to at times.  Hardly inspirational.

But the very fact he is neck and neck with Tony in terms of opinion that says a lot about Tony, doesn't it.  IN fact, Tony's approval rating is what...-30? 

Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 12:47pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:44pm: who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as. the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at. Yes a very poor leader.  Irritating to listen to at times.  Hardly inspirational. But the very fact he is neck and neck with Tony in terms of opinion that says a lot about Tony, doesn't it.  IN fact, Tony's approval rating is what...-30?  Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D

labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten.  but at least they had a national wide polling of the members to choose a leader and then over-rode it anyhow.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 12:53pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:44pm: who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as. the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at. Yes a very poor leader.  Irritating to listen to at times.  Hardly inspirational. But the very fact he is neck and neck with Tony in terms of opinion that says a lot about Tony, doesn't it.  IN fact, Tony's approval rating is what...-30?  Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten.  but at least they had a national wide polling of the members to choose a leader and then over-rode it anyhow.

yes yes but you missed this bit:
Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D


Also, members get 50% of the vote, you know that. Why lie?

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 12:53pm:

labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten

that says a lot when labors worst potential leader is still outpolling Abbott, apparently the libs best leader   ;D ;D ;D ;D

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 12:58pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:44pm: who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as. the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at. Yes a very poor leader.  Irritating to listen to at times.  Hardly inspirational. But the very fact he is neck and neck with Tony in terms of opinion that says a lot about Tony, doesn't it.  IN fact, Tony's approval rating is what...-30?  Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten.  but at least they had a national wide polling of the members to choose a leader and then over-rode it anyhow. yes yes but you missed this bit: Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D Also, members get 50% of the vote, you know that. Why lie?

It was a Rudd idea which is why it is so fatally flawed. He had a talent for unworkable ideas.  given the membership a say was stupid and what is worse, in doing it the way they did they allowed Albanese to be chosen by the members and the Caucus to override it.

what was the point? it is and remains a stupid leadership model. Caucus will still end up choosing the leader.

it was Rudd's final 'gift' to the ALP - an unworkable and embarrassing leadership system.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 1:14pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:58pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:44pm: who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as. the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at. Yes a very poor leader.  Irritating to listen to at times.  Hardly inspirational. But the very fact he is neck and neck with Tony in terms of opinion that says a lot about Tony, doesn't it.  IN fact, Tony's approval rating is what...-30?  Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten.  but at least they had a national wide polling of the members to choose a leader and then over-rode it anyhow. yes yes but you missed this bit: Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D Also, members get 50% of the vote, you know that. Why lie? It was a Rudd idea which is why it is so fatally flawed. He had a talent for unworkable ideas.  given the membership a say was stupid and what is worse, in doing it the way they did they allowed Albanese to be chosen by the members and the Caucus to override it. what was the point? it is and remains a stupid leadership model. Caucus will still end up choosing the leader. it was Rudd's final 'gift' to the ALP - an unworkable and embarrassing leadership system.

nice of you to avoid the point been made ....  :D :D :D

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 1:14pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:58pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:44pm: who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as. the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at. Yes a very poor leader.  Irritating to listen to at times.  Hardly inspirational. But the very fact he is neck and neck with Tony in terms of opinion that says a lot about Tony, doesn't it.  IN fact, Tony's approval rating is what...-30?  Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten.  but at least they had a national wide polling of the members to choose a leader and then over-rode it anyhow. yes yes but you missed this bit: Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D Also, members get 50% of the vote, you know that. Why lie? It was a Rudd idea which is why it is so fatally flawed. He had a talent for unworkable ideas.  given the membership a say was stupid and what is worse, in doing it the way they did they allowed Albanese to be chosen by the members and the Caucus to override it. what was the point? it is and remains a stupid leadership model. Caucus will still end up choosing the leader. it was Rudd's final 'gift' to the ALP - an unworkable and embarrassing leadership system.

Why are you ignoring?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 1:18pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 1:14pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:58pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:44pm: who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as. the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at. Yes a very poor leader.  Irritating to listen to at times.  Hardly inspirational. But the very fact he is neck and neck with Tony in terms of opinion that says a lot about Tony, doesn't it.  IN fact, Tony's approval rating is what...-30?  Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten.  but at least they had a national wide polling of the members to choose a leader and then over-rode it anyhow. yes yes but you missed this bit: Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D Also, members get 50% of the vote, you know that. Why lie? It was a Rudd idea which is why it is so fatally flawed. He had a talent for unworkable ideas.  given the membership a say was stupid and what is worse, in doing it the way they did they allowed Albanese to be chosen by the members and the Caucus to override it. what was the point? it is and remains a stupid leadership model. Caucus will still end up choosing the leader. it was Rudd's final 'gift' to the ALP - an unworkable and embarrassing leadership system. Why are you ignoring?

ignoring what?  the thread is about Shorten and I spoke about shorten and the flawed leadership system that put him in place. It's not like we could spend a whole thread on Shorten since he has done almost nothing.

John Smith wrote on Jul 25^th, 2014 at 11:25pm:

not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D

No sign of that yet. ::)

Dumb topic title BTW... ::) ::) ::)
One shouldn't stoop to the stupidity of others here.
Sets a bad example.
Let Progs be Progs.

Grendel wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 5:49pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 11:25pm: not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D No sign of that yet. ::)

Depends on what you consider a sign  :D :D

http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/politics/the-latest-polls-show-labor-leader-bill-shorten-would-have-become-primer-minister-if-an-election-was-held-last-week/story-fnkerdda-1229663291237

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 4:13pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 1:18pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 1:14pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:58pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:53pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:47pm: longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:44pm: who is bill shorten?  he is saying nothing and what little he says is weak as. the ALP have chosen a particularly poor leader, something they excel at. Yes a very poor leader.  Irritating to listen to at times.  Hardly inspirational. But the very fact he is neck and neck with Tony in terms of opinion that says a lot about Tony, doesn't it.  IN fact, Tony's approval rating is what...-30?  Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten.  but at least they had a national wide polling of the members to choose a leader and then over-rode it anyhow. yes yes but you missed this bit: Hmmm...So if Shorten is a poor leader, irritating to listen to and hardly inspirational, but at a +1 approval rating, what does that make Tony at -30 approval? ;D Also, members get 50% of the vote, you know that. Why lie? It was a Rudd idea which is why it is so fatally flawed. He had a talent for unworkable ideas.  given the membership a say was stupid and what is worse, in doing it the way they did they allowed Albanese to be chosen by the members and the Caucus to override it. what was the point? it is and remains a stupid leadership model. Caucus will still end up choosing the leader. it was Rudd's final 'gift' to the ALP - an unworkable and embarrassing leadership system. Why are you ignoring? ignoring what?  the thread is about Shorten and I spoke about shorten and the flawed leadership system that put him in place. It's not like we could spend a whole thread on Shorten since he has done almost nothing.

yes, run away longie  :D :D :D

Grendel wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 5:49pm:

John Smith wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 11:25pm: not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D No sign of that yet. ::)

No sign at all grendel.

Plenty signs that shorten is self destructing.

labor are corrupt wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 7:09pm:

Grendel wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 5:49pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 11:25pm: not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D No sign of that yet. ::) No sign at all grendel. Plenty signs that shorten is self destructing.

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/76/768ca2db5e3370c333391b6138f1d0076a8bd9eace82d7985d824ec75d5211ca.jpg

John Smith wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 7:11pm:

labor are corrupt wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 7:09pm: Grendel wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 5:49pm: John Smith wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 11:25pm: not the world, only the liberal party  ;D ;D No sign of that yet. ::) No sign at all grendel. Plenty signs that shorten is self destructing. http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/76/768ca2db5e3370c333391b6138f1d0076a8bd9eace82d7985d824ec75d5211ca.jpg

Gillard on a good day.

John Smith wrote on Jul 26^th, 2014 at 1:00pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 26th, 2014 at 12:53pm: labor would have been struggling to pick a worse leader than Shorten that says a lot when labors worst potential leader is still outpolling Abbott, apparently the libs best leader   ;D ;D ;D ;D

There's always Fat Joe.... now that would be a hoot.