Abuhafs al Australi


Google;
Abuhafs al Australi




IMAGE....
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/19/article-0-1E01ACA500000578-436_634x358.jpg
Mohamed Elomar, aka, Abuhafs al Australi




Quote:

Brisbane woman charged for supporting terrorism whilst her Australian husband fights in Syrian civil war as member of a brutal militant group - so extreme it's rejected by Al-Qaeda 19 May 2014     Authorities confirm that her husband is Mohamed Elomar, who left Sydney in November to fight in Syria     He openly declares his loyalty to jihadist Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, or ISIS, on a Facebook page

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632768/Brisbane-woman-charged-supporting-terrorism-whilst-Australian-husband-fights-Syria-member-brutal-militant-group.html



QUESTION;
When are these people [the moslem community in Australia] going to experience the LAWFUL consequence of breaking our laws, and conspiring to break our laws ?

[Sheik Hilali and Carnita Mathews are two names that come to mind.]

Of belonging to a lying, deceitful philosophy [ISLAM], which encourages political and religious violence against those who do not believe as they believe ?

How long are the authorities in Australia going to allow the members of this 'community' [ISLAM], to continue to work [subversively] to usurp and to undermine and to work to destroy Australian society, and to work to destroy the values of freedom and truth, and to work to destroy respect for law [in Australia] - values which Australians have struggled for, and values which many Australians have made painful sacrifices to defend ?

Where are the charges of treason, and where are the charges of sedition, against many members of the moslem community who are engaged in a widespread conspiracy of lying to Australians [of lying to the Australian community] when they [moslems] claim to bear no ill will, to Australia, its people, and its governing authorities ?

What is ISLAM ?

ISLAM 'is', violent, religious bigotry.

ISLAM exists, so that violent religious bigotry can be spread throughout the world - by moslems.







Religious bigotry, and moslem crimes of religious violence [against those who do not believe as they [moslem] believe], are all MADE LAWFUL, by ISLAM itself !



"....Lo! Allah is an enemy to those who reject Faith."
Koran 2.98


"....those who reject Allah have no protector."
Koran 47.008
v. 8-11


"Fighting [against unbelievers] is prescribed for you, and [if] ye dislike it.....Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
Koran 2.216


"O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him)."
Koran 9.123


"Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain:...."
Koran 9.111


"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. "
Koran 9.29



+++






Dictionary;
bigot = =
1  a person who is prejudiced in their views and intolerant of the opinions of others.
2  a person who expresses an opinion/view which does not coincide with the opinion/views of Brian_Ross.


n.b.
Bigots, are those people who are,
".....intolerant of the opinions of others."




Is the promulgation, within Australia, of violent religious bigotry, what our governing authorities in Australia should tolerate ?

Because ISLAM does promulgate the idea, that political violence, against those who do not believe as they [moslems] believe, is a 'LAWFUL' act.





e.g.
THIS IS ISLAM, BEING TOLERATED - IN THE UK !

YT
KILLING OF NON-MUSLIMS IS LEGITIMATE
"...when we say innocent people, we mean moslems."
"....[not accepting ISLAM] is a crime against God."
"...If you are a non-moslem, then you are guilty of not believing in God."
"...as a moslem....i must have hatred towards everything which is non-ISLAM."
"...[moslems] allegiance is always with the moslems, so i will never condemn a moslem for what he does."
"...Britain has always been Dar al Harb [the Land of War]"
"...no, i could never condemn a moslem brother, i would never condemn a moslem brother. I will always stand with my moslem brother....whether he is an oppresser or the oppressed."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4




e.g.
THIS IS ISLAM, BEING TOLERATED - IN AUSTRALIA !


Quote:

Use children as troops, says cleric January 18, 2007 SYDNEY'S most influential radical Muslim cleric has been caught on film calling Jews pigs and urging children to die for Allah. Firebrand Sheik Feiz Mohammed, head of the Global Islamic Youth Centre in Liverpool [Australia], delivered the hateful rants on a collection of DVDs called the Death Series being sold in Australia and overseas. .........Sheik Feiz says in the video. "We want to have children and offer them as soldiers defending Islam. Teach them this: There is nothing more beloved to me than wanting to die as a mujahid (holy warrior). Put in their soft, tender hearts the zeal of jihad and a love of martyrdom." An Australian citizen born in Sydney who has spent the past year living in Lebanon, Sheik Feiz was exposed this week in a British documentary Undercover Mosque. ......"The peak, the pinnacle, the crest, the highest point, the pivot, the summit of Islam is jihad," he declares in the film, before denouncing "kaffirs" (non-Muslims). "Kaffir is the worst word ever written, a sign of infidelity, disbelief, filth, a sign of dirt." ......Sheik Feiz - who just two weeks ago said he felt like an "alien" in his own country - leads about 4000 followers through his Global Islamic Youth Centre in Sydney's southwest. He also accused Australian authorities of being over-zealous in their approach to clerics like him.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21074839-2,00.html
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014863.php




QUESTION;
Why are persons who follow, and embrace, and spread, such a vile, violent, and destructive philosophy [as ISLAM] allowed to reside within Australia ?

They might have got their act together in the UK. Guess who is bleating loudest about human rights.

In addition, the proposal puts so much power into one individual hands. The case of Hilal al-Jedda has already been raised in parliamentary debates. An Iraqi-born man received a ruling from the Supreme Court that he could not lose his British citizenship as it would be illegal to make him stateless. Theresa May stripped his citizenship a second time only weeks after the verdict.

http://www.mpacuk.org/story/170514/stop-theresa-may-making-people-stateless.html#ixzz32HO4ORVw

Who was this perfect man?

Explosives expert Hilal Al-Jedda was given asylum in 1992 but his British passport was withdrawn after returned to Iraq where he was accused of plotting atrocities against coalition forces
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2451598/Bomb-suspect-passport-judge-rules-Iraqi-stripped-nationality-plotting-atrocities-coalition-forces-return-Britain.html#ixzz32HOQOf3X

But this may have them STUFFED.

The Commons looked set for a game of ping pong with the Lords today, after MPs voted to give Theresa May the power to strip Brits of their citizenship.

The home secretary won the vote by 305 to 239, despite opposition from Labour and some Liberal Democrat and Tory MPs


http://www.politics.co.uk/news/2014/05/07/may-s-power-to-strip-brits-of-their-citizenship-returns-to-t

Why does the victim have less human rights than the perpetrator?

Yadda wrote on May 20^th, 2014 at 1:28am:

QUESTION; When are these people [the moslem community in Australia] going to experience the LAWFUL consequence of breaking our laws, and conspiring to break our laws ? [Sheik Hilali and Carnita Matthews are two names that come to mind.] ......

Regarding Sheik Hilali and Carnita Matthews;
If published reports of their behaviour are true [and those reports - which includes video evidence - do appear to be true], then both Sheik Hilali and Carnita Matthews have intentionally lied to police, and have intentionally attempted to incriminate an innocent 3rd party.




Wasting police time.
Making a false report to police.
Intentionally lying to police and intentionally attempting to >> incriminate << an >> innocent << 3rd party.

Dictionary;
incriminate = = make (someone) appear guilty of a crime or wrongdoing.



EVIDENCE?
Re Sheik Hilali,
PLEASE WATCH THIS YOUTUBE VIDEO.....
Sheik Hilaly Caught vandalizing his own Mosque                  goto 20s,   goto 3m 01s,   goto 4m 01s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9O5KPI4qTI




QUESTION;
Where are the consequences upon these two people, for what they have actually done, and for what they have tried to do ?

Sure these crimes have been serendipitously exposed.

But after the exposure [of this wrongdoing], is the Australian 'justice' system, then going to refuse to bring any consequences down upon people like these ?

And why!!!!

For the sake of legitimising what is a counterfeit inter-community 'social harmony' with a moslem community, whose members are continually seeking new ways to break our laws - and then [on discovery] demanding, that there must always be minimal consequence to themselves, whenever they [do] intentionally break our laws !!

And for what !!!

For the sake of a counterfeit inter-community 'social harmony' ?!!!!






QUESTION;
If the Australian community is going to choose to tolerate such a situation, i.e. that the Australian community will allow a moslem to be able to make false and incriminating accusations against an innocent 3rd party,
.....and if other moslems [here in Australia] see that there will be virtually no consequence, for making, false and incriminating accusations [against an innocent 3rd party],
.....then what is going to dissuade yet more moslems, from continuing to make false and incriminating accusations against yet more innocent persons ?




+++

Deuteronomy 19:16
If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;
17  Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days;
18  And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother;
19  Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.
20  And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you.
21  And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

Adamant wrote on May 20^th, 2014 at 10:04am:

They might have got their act together in the UK. Guess who is bleating loudest about human rights. In addition, the proposal puts so much power into one individual hands. The case of Hilal al-Jedda has already been raised in parliamentary debates. An Iraqi-born man received a ruling from the Supreme Court that he could not lose his British citizenship as it would be illegal to make him stateless. Theresa May stripped his citizenship a second time only weeks after the verdict. http://www.mpacuk.org/story/170514/stop-theresa-may-making-people-stateless.html#ixzz32HO4ORVw Who was this perfect man? Explosives expert Hilal Al-Jedda was given asylum in 1992 but his British passport was withdrawn after returned to Iraq where he was accused of plotting atrocities against coalition forces http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2451598/Bomb-suspect-passport-judge-rules-Iraqi-stripped-nationality-plotting-atrocities-coalition-forces-return-Britain.html#ixzz32HOQOf3X But this may have them STUFFED. The Commons looked set for a game of ping pong with the Lords today, after MPs voted to give Theresa May the power to strip Brits of their citizenship. The home secretary won the vote by 305 to 239, despite opposition from Labour and some Liberal Democrat and Tory MPs http://www.politics.co.uk/news/2014/05/07/may-s-power-to-strip-brits-of-their-citizenship-returns-to-t Why does the victim have less human rights than the perpetrator?

Coz sanity does not prevail in this world ???

Coz most humans today would rather choose 1/ self interest, AND, 2/ abandon [self] responsibility - rather than choose sanity ???i


Quote:

A simple definition of SANITY/INSANITY. Typically, an unrestrained sane person will act in ways which are harmless to others, and in ways which are creative, and productive [for himself, others, and society]. And typically, and conversely, an unrestrained INSANE person will act in ways which are harmful and destructive to himself, and, or, others around him.

'Normal' criminal behaviour - in mankind
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1293669294/0#0

He wants to kill upon his return.

---

Taqqiya again?

polite_gandalf wrote on May 21^st, 2014 at 11:44am:

Taqqiya again?

gandalf,

Nah, not Taqqiya.

Sounds full of boasting,      ....not Taqqiya.




When a man believes that he has the freedom to act as he wishes, the foolish man will boast of all that he can do - to others.


"If you want to know a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln




IMAGE....
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/19/article-0-1E01ACA500000578-436_634x358.jpg
Mohamed Elomar - in Australia;

"Who me ? A Jihadist ??? Nah.      ISLAM is peace, maaaaate."





IMAGE....
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/05/19/article-2632768-1E0223E600000578-948_634x641.jpg
Mohamed Elomar - in Syria;

"Dont think asio can protect u - Me and my bro's are going to bring the angel of death to youse infidels doors! blah...blah...blah."






Psalms 37:8
Cease from anger, and forsake wrath: fret not thyself in any wise to do evil.
9  For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the LORD, they shall inherit the earth.

Proverbs 14:16
A wise man feareth, and departeth from evil: but the fool rageth, and is confident.