Australian Politics Forum

Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl Member Run Boards >> Environment >> A concensus that has been 97% cooked. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1400488695 Message started by progressiveslol on May 19^th, 2014 at 6:38pm

Title: A concensus that has been 97% cooked.
Post by progressiveslol on May 19^th, 2014 at 6:38pm

Interesting goings on with a consensus we all know that has been 97% cooked and an Australian university that is doing its bit for the last 3%.

http://hiizuru.wordpress.com/2014/05/18/a-direct-challenge/

Title: Re: A concensus that has been 97% cooked.
Post by Mx Horse on May 24^th, 2014 at 11:12am

lol, tony abbott is known as a shyster world-wide ;D

Title: Re: A concensus that has been 97% cooked.
Post by lee on May 24^th, 2014 at 12:55pm

How does one peer review more than 200 abstracts in one day? Always assuming the abstract is an accurate summary of the actual paper.

Download abstract
Control "F"
"man"
Click "Find"
Tick

In a 24hour day, about 8 abstracts per hour.

Title: Re: A concensus that has been 97% cooked.
Post by austranger on May 24^th, 2014 at 1:51pm

http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/06/06/campaigns-tried-break-climate-science-consensus

:D

1400324695134.jpg (85 KB | 37 )

Title: Re: A concensus that has been 97% cooked.
Post by lee on May 24^th, 2014 at 5:57pm

desmodblog a blog with no credentials?

But I didn't see where they asked the question on how one peer reviewed 200 odd papers in a day.

peter Gleick and Heartland again? ID theft, made up papers- really?