Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Feedback >> signatures. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1394427463 Message started by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 2:57pm |
Title: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 2:57pm
why do [mostly] lefties need to use the signature
it now appears moving [sigs] isnt enough, even comic strips..wastnt enough it now has to be BOLD and COLOURED.. what is it about this attention getter??????.. do they have problems with being ignored?? maybe it was a sad childhood maybe they didnt fully develop into adulthood.... at this rate it wont be long before the whole page is used by signatures..?? |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by bigvicfella on Mar 10th, 2014 at 3:02pm cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 2:57pm:
You used to have a scrolling signature I believe? After SOB showed you how it was done - yes? |
Title: More Whinging by Cods Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 10th, 2014 at 3:40pm cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 2:57pm:
whinge whinge whinge whinge SOB |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Winston Smith on Mar 10th, 2014 at 4:06pm cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 2:57pm:
In my opinion, references to other posters outside of mutual voluntary engagement within a thread relevant to the topic being discussed, without their explicit consent; is tantamount to harassment. |
Title: Re: More Whinging by Cods Post by Kat on Mar 10th, 2014 at 4:21pm Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 3:40pm:
Egg-zackerly. Wonder how she'd go if everyone had something like this...? ![]() |
Title: Re: More Whinging by Cods Post by Winston Smith on Mar 10th, 2014 at 4:25pm Kat wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 4:21pm:
You don't have someone elses name in your signature. By the way, are you on the payroll of Ford? |
Title: Re: More Whinging by Cods Post by Kat on Mar 10th, 2014 at 4:27pm Winston Smith wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 4:25pm:
No, but I do have a soft spot for early Fairlanes... :) ;) |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:00pm Vic wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 3:02pm:
WRONG...IT WAS A SCROLLING MESSAGE.. LIKE THIS. |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:01pm
WELL IT WAS ALL MEANT TO SCROLL.. ::) ::) ::) ;D ;D ;D
SHOWS HOW OFTEN I USED IT DOESNT IT??? |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by bigvicfella on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:04pm cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:00pm:
Oh I see! |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:09pm Winston Smith wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 4:06pm:
YOU MEAN I CAN SUE THE LITTLE TURD.>>> WOW... SOB IS A AN ATTENTION SEEKER.. definition.. The need for attention Human beings are social creatures and need social interaction, feedback, and validation of their worth. The emotionally mature person doesn't need to go hunting for these; they gain it naturally from their daily life, especially from their work and from stable relationships. Daniel Goleman calls emotional maturity emotional intelligence, or EQ; he believes, and I agree, that EQ is a much better indicator of a person's character and value than intelligence quotient, or IQ. The emotionally immature person, however, has low levels of self-esteem and self-confidence and consequently feels insecure; to counter these feelings of insecurity they will spend a large proportion of their lives creating situations in which they become the centre of attention. It may be that the need for attention is inversely proportional to emotional maturity, therefore anyone indulging in attention-seeking behaviours is telling you how emotionally immature they are. Attention-seeking behaviour is surprisingly common. Being the centre of attention alleviates feelings of insecurity and inadequacy but the relief is temporary as the underlying problem remains unaddressed: low self-confidence and low self-esteem, and consequent low levels of self-worth and self-love. fits some like a glove I would think.. 8-) 8-) 8-) |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:10pm Vic wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:04pm:
thats good you do see the difference dont you???.. :o |
Title: Re: More Whinging by Cods Post by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:12pm Winston Smith wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 4:25pm:
its the usual sour grape mob that only com e on the boards to make personal attacks... its their hobby I believe.,.pretty sad... not a word about the topic...but we are used to it from the usual one liners.....ooops thats another thread. |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Frances on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:21pm
I don't really like scrolling signatures. I find them rather annoying, particularly if the font is large, bold and coloured.....
|
Title: More Whinging by Cods Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:39pm cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:09pm:
Reported SOB |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Winston Smith on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:46pm cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:09pm:
cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:12pm:
Whatever the motivation, at the end of the day it's harassment. I would make a complaint to the moderators. |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:54pm Frances wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:21pm:
you will now encourage the troll to do one for you.. just to show us he IS immature like we suspect. ;) |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:59pm Winston Smith wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:46pm:
I dont think they care... after all its been there a while and not one of them has stopped it.. so it must be okay with them.... it is personal..something that we get told over and over and over again IS NOT ALLOWED... but who am I??.. ::) sob needs attention..if its taken away from him.. who knows what might happen.. did you not see his comic strip??..no it wasnt about me.. I wouldnt even know what it was about.. and I dont think sob did either but it was there for months...to each his own as they say.,. it teaches me one thing winston... dont do the same.... whatever else you do, never follow in those footsteps.. |
Title: More Whinging by Cods Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 10th, 2014 at 6:12pm
Whinge whinge whinge whinge
SOB |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by bigvicfella on Mar 10th, 2014 at 6:14pm cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:10pm:
Oh yes, a scrolling signature and a scrolling message are REALLY different. Especially when you are whining about people scrolling ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Winston Smith on Mar 10th, 2014 at 6:14pm cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 5:59pm:
Ignoring it is probably the best option for you, but I might feel compelled to make a complaint if it continues. |
Title: More Whinging by Cods Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 11th, 2014 at 5:16am
This one?
And it wasnt months SOB ![]() |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 11th, 2014 at 5:35am Vic wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 6:14pm:
I agree. |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 11th, 2014 at 5:39am Winston Smith wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 6:14pm:
;D ;D ;D ;D. no I prefer to prove my point..... ::) ::) ::) as you can see by the result...I think I did.. ;D ;D ;D its a good job its funny otherwise it would be sad.. ;) ;) and they claim I am petty....HILARIOUS |
Title: More Whinging by Cods Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 11th, 2014 at 6:16am cods wrote on Mar 11th, 2014 at 5:39am:
Obviously you dont understand sarcasm SOB |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Deathridesahorse on Mar 14th, 2014 at 7:27am cods wrote on Mar 10th, 2014 at 2:57pm:
Hey, victim: eat something for breakfast you don't hate or something! Repetition is hell they say.....m ::) |
Title: Re: More Whinging by Cods Post by Frances on Mar 14th, 2014 at 8:11am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 11th, 2014 at 5:16am:
It seemed like it..... |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by freediver on Mar 15th, 2014 at 7:46am
Some rules for signatures:
No external links or URLs. No personal criticism of other members. This rule will be interpreted more strictly for signatures than for normal posts, due to their broadcast nature and the lack of right of reply. |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 15th, 2014 at 8:09am freediver wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 7:46am:
Is there a rule for moderators changing your sig to be something rude (nice person)? SOB |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by mantra on Mar 15th, 2014 at 8:25am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 8:09am:
I vaguely remember this happening on a few occasions - so a precedent has been set. I think the signatures might have been offensive though. |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by muso on Mar 15th, 2014 at 9:18am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 8:09am:
For the record, I think you're a nice person too. Can we have a group hug? - er maybe not. Would you have preferred "nice cat?" |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:27pm muso wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 9:18am:
So you think theres nothing wrong with fiddling with someones personal settings? Shows what kind of person you are. SOB |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:41pm muso wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 9:18am:
I am trying to figure out if I am flattered..or miss the attention... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D I am a bit of a star after all... I would like it if muso explained that I did not complain once....as I have been advised.. I thought it would go its course.. and this was entirely a head office decision I like the group hug idea... maybe another smiley for those. |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by mantra on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:46pm |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Spot of Borg on Mar 15th, 2014 at 4:02pm cods wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 3:41pm:
It wasnt a "head office decision". It was muso interfering because he had access to the buttons. If it was a head office decision i would have been asked to change it or something wouldnt i? SOB |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by muso on Mar 15th, 2014 at 5:29pm
I agree. Thanks for participating in the group hug, Spot.
|
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Kat on Mar 15th, 2014 at 6:14pm
I quite like this one, too... shame we can't use them, but I do understand why we can't.
![]() |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 16th, 2014 at 8:34am |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by mantra on Mar 16th, 2014 at 8:43am |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by cods on Mar 16th, 2014 at 8:45am muso wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 5:29pm:
;D ;D ;D |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by Winston Smith on Mar 16th, 2014 at 8:47am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Mar 15th, 2014 at 8:09am:
What would you like your signature to be? |
Title: Re: signatures. Post by freediver on Mar 16th, 2014 at 8:50am
Images are stripped from within quotes, so save wear and tear on scroll wheels.
|
Title: Re: signatures. Post by mantra on Mar 16th, 2014 at 8:56am
Good idea. There's nothing worse than seeing these giant pictures included in one quoted post after another.
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |