http://i62.tinypic.com/rhjq09.gif http://i59.tinypic.com/2co31x0.gif

http://joannenova.com.au/

Yes ... and that is most definately due to global warming  http://d26ya5yqg8yyvs.cloudfront.net/ImaPoser.gif http://d26ya5yqg8yyvs.cloudfront.net/ImaPoser.gif http://d26ya5yqg8yyvs.cloudfront.net/ImaPoser.gif

Uncertainty principle says what?

For the trillionth time: it's always a measurement problem!

Why do you reckon the maths of stats was invented??

You want to do some circle work do ya: well, I cost ya know!!  :o :o :o :o  :-*

Ajax wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 2:26pm:

http://i62.tinypic.com/rhjq09.gif http://i59.tinypic.com/2co31x0.gif http://joannenova.com.au/

Ajax, if you want people to bother with your sources, then you'd best avoid the scrapings from the bottom of the loony bin.


Quote:

Joanne Nova Credentials Joanne Nova holds a Bachelor of Science degree in microbiology from the University of Western Australia. She also has a Graduate Certificate in Science Communications from the Australian National University. Background Joanne Nova is a self-proclaimed climate change skeptic who declares that science has disproved the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW). Nova's most notable work in the area of climate change is the controversial document, "The Skeptic's Handbook." The Skeptic's Handbook asserts that global warming is not caused by greenhouse gasses, that "the world has not warmed since 2001," and that any global warming is a natural process. ...

Quote:

Joanne Nova aka JoNova (real name Joanne Codling), born circa 1967, is an Australian right wing communicator who mainly writes to promote anti-science views of climate in books and a denialist weblog, joannenova.com.au. She has no evident academic background in climate science; her degree (B.Sc.) is in molecular biology.

I'm not qualified to interpret whatever misrepresentations she's come up with this time. Nor am I interested in wasting time trying.

Find someone to quote who's qualified to comment.

Hey hash

Are the weather stations in Melbourne and Adelaide telling us lies.

You don't need to be an Einstein to read them.

There right up there at the top, can you read a graph its that simple.

So stop trying to con us with world domination dressed up as environmentalism.

Take the UN's agenda and shove it where it fits.

Ajax. Two stations in Adelaide and one weather station in Melbourne selected at "random"? -

A sample of 3 out of how many weather stations worldwide?

Are you serious?

You and Lee should compare notes. He's every bit as much of a genius are you are.

What DRAH says in this case is absolutely correct.

That's right and most scientists are not statisticians- Just ask Michael Mann.

Which countires have recorded record absolute temperatures in the last 30 years of global warming? That is at individual sites, not a conglomerate for Australia, USA etc.

Quote:

That's right and most scientists are not statisticians- Just ask Michael Mann.

Friend of yours is he?

...they see what their denialist priests and cult instructs them to see

---

Looks like Ajax needs to generate some income

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 9:04am:

Looks like Ajax needs to generate some income

Ajax went missing for while

But we all know why he uses several aliases in here don't we ladies and gentlemen

He also pretends to be from the Southern shores of the Mediterranean for some unknown reason

lee wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 9:17pm:

That's right and most scientists are not statisticians- Just ask Michael Mann. Which countires have recorded record absolute temperatures in the last 30 years of global warming? That is at individual sites, not a conglomerate for Australia, USA etc.

Lee dont know the difference between temperature and heat content  ;D

Hey, the 30 billion page circle party awaits and lee invites you all but alas im already experienced thanx all the same sorry lee!

Chimp_Logic wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 2:02pm:

ImSpartacus2 wrote on Feb 10th, 2014 at 9:04am: Looks like Ajax needs to generate some income Ajax went missing for while But we all know why he uses several aliases in here don't we ladies and gentlemen He also pretends to be from the Southern shores of the Mediterranean for some unknown reason

Harming unborn generations of little boys and girls must get lonely at times.. let us all feel sorry for ajax  ;D

Wow you guys are unbelievable.

Why did you change the title of my thread..???????

Just goes to show how much you have been brainwashed into believing the anthropogenic global warming religion.

Must be rather like a sickness or a drug addiction.

How fanatical is that, I'm glad you guys weren't part of the hilter youth, there would have been no stopping you.

Really pathetic to change the title of my thread.

http://i61.tinypic.com/15ph5yd.png

muso wrote on Feb 9^th, 2014 at 10:01pm:

Friend of yours is he?

Nope the only similarity is our hopelessness in stats.

Even I, as a gardener, know that tree rings are more to do with water than temperature. But I'm only a layman.

And then to append modern temperature records on the end of his graph- I guess his later tree ring data must have been corrupted and unusable.

Ajax wrote on Feb 10^th, 2014 at 2:36pm:

Wow you guys are unbelievable. Why did you change the title of my thread..???????

- because it was really funny that you were trying to say that the selected records of three isolated weather stations were somehow representative of global climate.

Don't worry. We're laughing at Joanne Nova - not you. It was so pathetic. She really should stick to her party tricks.

http://joannenova.com.au/images/bookpic/activitybook9cm.gif

By this stage, even you must have realised how ridiculous the OP was.

Hey, lay off Jo Nova! She's my favourite comedienne.

We all know WH Ajax really is

don't we ladies and gentlemen

No.

http://www.saffrondust.com.au/product_images/uploaded_images/paella1.jpeg

I take that to be your answer?

But I'm still confused. Am I a sceptic impersonating a climate change believing nancy-boy, or am I a rational person pretending to be a conspiracy theory toting denialist nutjob?

Please help me figure this out. Because if it turns out I am actually Ajax  I shall check myself in to a clinic.

Paella wrote on Feb 11^th, 2014 at 11:37pm:

I take that to be your answer? But I'm still confused. Am I a sceptic impersonating a climate change believing nancy-boy, or am I a rational person pretending to be a conspiracy theory toting denialist nutjob? Please help me figure this out. Because if it turns out I am actually Ajax  I shall check myself in to a clinic.

Don't be so hard on yourself.

Just look at the peer reviewed scientific literature and what the experts in the field are saying.

You can call yourself whatever you like if it pleases you.

The facts remain

Have you actually read any of my posts? I think you've confused me with somebody else.

Paella wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 10:19pm:

Have you actually read any of my posts? I think you've confused me with somebody else.

Well its often very difficult in this forum to ascertain HOW many REAL people there are.

We can determine how many so called individual participants there are in these rooms.

But who knows. who is who and what is what

All we know about you at the moment is that you seem to like Spanish cuisine

Paella wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 10:19pm:

Have you actually read any of my posts? I think you've confused me with somebody else.

Don't get too upset. Chimp has a habit of claiming that various people are having arguments with themselves.

It's actually all a bit of a smokescreen, because we all know who Ajax really is.

http://www.beazley.ox.ac.uk/dictionary/Dict/image/ajaxLIMC.jpg

Chimp_Logic wrote on Feb 12^th, 2014 at 11:13pm:

Well its often very difficult in this forum to ascertain HOW many REAL people there are. We can determine how many so called individual participants there are in these rooms. But who knows. who is who and what is what All we know about you at the moment is that you seem to like Spanish cuisine

Paella is a real person. He was previously quite active here long before you and has made many good posts.

There are also plenty of people who are totally unreal, and some who are in the realms of the surreal.

- and there are some who go totally ape / bananas at the slightest suggestion of the n- word.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tHBIRfvsoOE/Ta1PDootKAI/AAAAAAAABT4/sIXav8ridgA/s1600/radioactive_symbol_250.jpg

http://www.mikemacdonald.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/chimp_gun-300x190.jpg

muso wishes to inform everyone in here that there are NO posters who use more than one nickname

Now why would someone defend the indefensible?

Haven't you war mists figured out that you have lost the argument?

Preaching your religious convictions over and over isn't going to convince anyone to join your cult.

Keatingisgod wrote on Feb 15^th, 2014 at 3:55pm:

Haven't you war mists figured out that you have lost the argument? Preaching your religious convictions over and over isn't going to convince anyone to join your cult.

Why did Keatingisgod vote for copper interenet??????????????????????????????

:o :o

Chimp_Logic wrote on Feb 15^th, 2014 at 3:08pm:

muso wishes to inform everyone in here that there are NO posters who use more than one nickname Now why would someone defend the indefensible?

That's a strawman, chimp. I was talking about one specific poster.  We already know that you're innocent_bystander for example.

muso wrote on Feb 16^th, 2014 at 8:56am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Feb 15th, 2014 at 3:08pm: muso wishes to inform everyone in here that there are NO posters who use more than one nickname Now why would someone defend the indefensible? That's a strawman, chimp. I was talking about one specific poster.  We already know that you're innocent_bystander for example.

Its a very well defined and rigid straw man.

I can only recall you defending the indefensible when it comes to multiple aliases in here.

Surely you don't use one do you?

Tell me it isn't true - I would be bitterly crushed if it were true muso

You know perfectly well that I don't use socks, and I don't think you do either, apart from one that you used a few years ago, but certainly not concurrently.

Of the regular posters on here (Environment), none use socks on Environment that I'm aware of. 

Are you satisfied with that?

muso wrote on Feb 16^th, 2014 at 2:01pm:

You know perfectly well that I don't use socks, and I don't think you do either, apart from one that you used a few years ago, but certainly not concurrently. Of the regular posters on here (Environment), none use socks on Environment that I'm aware of.  Are you satisfied with that?

well I would have continued with that nickname, if it wasn't banned.

Remember the good old days muso when people would be banned for very mild insults like "deranged, smelly putrid clown freak fascist maggot scum"?

Times have changed haven't they muso, you putrid repetitive turd rolling dung beetle freak maggot sloth

Chimp, you really need to take that holiday in Radium Springs. You're exhibiting all the symptoms of radiation deficiency.

http://www.hotsprings.ca/RADIUM_HOT_SPRINGS.php

After a few days there, you'll be feeling your usual radiant self again.