No

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/01/does-global-warming-theory-predict-record-cold/

Record cold from global warming causing 'polar vortex' debunked


a recent paper finds no evidence of any unusual or unprecedented changes in the latitude or speed of the North Atlantic jet stream over the past 142 years since 1871. Another paper confirms there is no evidence that climate change has slowed the jet stream or increased frequency of jet stream blocking.


http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com.au/2014/01/record-cold-due-to-global-warming.html

It would seem the AGW loons predicting the field (selecting every possible senario of weather and saying 'see its climate change') gig is up.

The goal post are going to be staying in one place from now on thank you very much. No more of their BS.

Run away as much as you like, the globe is heating up.

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2014/01/05/go-home-arctic-youre-drunk/

There are no predictions of cold weather from the global warming cult, they are furiously trying to enter those predictions now because of the cold weather but you'll find that prior to a couple of years ago there were no predictions of cold weather from the global warming cult, only heat.

"you'll find that prior to a couple of years ago there were no predictions of cold weather from the global warming cult, only heat."

Well I can remember the predictions of the UK becoming a lot colder, but then again I have a reasonable memory

You mean the 'global cooling' scare of the seventies?

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 10:49am:

No

Yes

A warming globe caused by climate change has more extreme weather.  Extreme hot, cold, drought, floods.

But overall the climate is warmer.


In physics heat = energy.

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 11:08am:

There are no predictions of cold weather from the global warming cult, they are furiously trying to enter those predictions now because of the cold weather but you'll find that prior to a couple of years ago there were no predictions of cold weather from the global warming cult, only heat.

Did you miss Al Gore's movie, or even the hollywood blockbuster "the day after tomorrow".

You need to get out more.

Its all heat engines: no heat no weather no climate!

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 10:52am:

It would seem the AGW loons predicting the field (selecting every possible senario of weather and saying 'see its climate change') gig is up. The goal post are going to be staying in one place from now on thank you very much. No more of their BS.

They'll still spin their BS.  It's what they do best.


http://i56.tinypic.com/1slj61.gif

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 2:50pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 10:52am: It would seem the AGW loons predicting the field (selecting every possible senario of weather and saying 'see its climate change') gig is up. The goal post are going to be staying in one place from now on thank you very much. No more of their BS. They'll still spin their BS.  It's what they do best. http://i56.tinypic.com/1slj61.gif

Vested interests say what?

I can never tell who is believing what on this site.

The sarcasm is strong in this one Luke

You deniers dont have a leg to stand on here.


Youve made up the claim the global warming cant produce cold weather. Totally made it up. No scientist has ever said that.   

In fact many scientists have said that global warming will produce a climate of extreme weather, hot and cold.

To claim ignorance of that is to claim ignorance of Al Gore's "An inconvenient truth", which you all see to love to quote when it suits you.  Didnt that movie predice a northern hemisphere snowball ?

9-11 happened! Disintegration of system happens! System corrupts man!

Doctor Jolly wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 1:28pm:

A warming globe caused by climate change has more extreme weather.  Extreme hot, cold, drought, floods.

But according to the IPCC-

'Higher (increasing) minimum temperatures; fewer cold days, frost days, and cold waves over nearly all land areas (very likely)

• Decreased cold-related human morbidity and mortality [4.7]
• Decreased risk of damage to a number of crops, and increased risk to others [4.2]
• Extended range and activity of some pest and disease vectors [4.2 and 4.3]
• Reduced heating energy demand [4.5]

https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/climate-changes-2001/synthesis-syr/english/wg2-summary-policymakers.pdf

Not greater cold extremes.

lee wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 5:49pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 1:28pm: A warming globe caused by climate change has more extreme weather.  Extreme hot, cold, drought, floods. But according to the IPCC- 'Higher (increasing) minimum temperatures; fewer cold days, frost days, and cold waves over nearly all land areas (very likely) • Decreased cold-related human morbidity and mortality [4.7] • Decreased risk of damage to a number of crops, and increased risk to others [4.2] • Extended range and activity of some pest and disease vectors [4.2 and 4.3] • Reduced heating energy demand [4.5] https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/climate-changes-2001/synthesis-syr/english/wg2-summary-policymakers.pdf Not greater cold extremes.

Ever heard of turbulence? Such things are termed non linear as we haven't all the equations to solve all the variables!

Jet stream oscillations, like el nino and other recognised psuedo-systems, are only sort of understood!

Like economics... it gets complicated unless you're in the business of feigning and/or demanding certainty!

Business is business and we all know how to place a bet! The economic lie that ripping the kids off is productive cannot live...

SPECIFICALLY: where does it say cold snaps can't happen?  :D

Does Global Warming Theory Predict Record Cold?

Yes it does.

Dnarever wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 6:21pm:

Does Global Warming Theory Predict Record Cold? Yes it does.

Link...na

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 6:28pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 6:21pm: Does Global Warming Theory Predict Record Cold? Yes it does. Link...na

Link - Why don't you know anything ?

Climate change is displayed in extreme weather conditions in all directions.

Hot cold droughts floods, The expectation is for an increase in extremes - all of them including cold.

The heading says RECORD COLD.

Please provide a link of scientists predicting RECORD COLD.

lee wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 8:18pm:

The heading says RECORD COLD. Please provide a link of scientists predicting RECORD COLD.

You will be waiting till hell freezes over for that link  ;D

lee wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 8:18pm:

The heading says RECORD COLD. Please provide a link of scientists predicting RECORD COLD.

Give them a chance to make one up, move the goal posts, and then get back to you.

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 9:58pm:

lee wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 8:18pm: The heading says RECORD COLD. Please provide a link of scientists predicting RECORD COLD. You will be waiting till hell freezes over for that link  ;D

If you have no idea about the basics this is a good start:

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/understanding-the-effects-of-climate-change-and-gl.html

http://www.nqwgreens.ca//graphics/GlobalWarmingForDummies.jpg

Funny that people with such strong opinions on the topic don't even have a basic understanding of the subject.

Does that include the IPCC?

' No best estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity can now be given because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and studies.'

http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session36/p36_doc3_approved_spm.pdf

But they have high confidence in the warming. If climate sensitivity to CO2 is so uncertain, how can you have high confidence in an outcome?

lee wrote on Jan 10^th, 2014 at 2:08pm:

Does that include the IPCC? ' No best estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity can now be given because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and studies.' http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session36/p36_doc3_approved_spm.pdf But they have high confidence in the warming. If climate sensitivity to CO2 is so uncertain, how can you have high confidence in an outcome?

You cant. Its purely a guess at this stage

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 9:58pm:

lee wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 8:18pm: The heading says RECORD COLD. Please provide a link of scientists predicting RECORD COLD. You will be waiting till hell freezes over for that link  ;D

                                         :o


http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-01-08/in-pictures-us-weather-when-hell-froze-over/

Here you go, for those than can think.

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10^th, 2014 at 2:29pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2014 at 2:08pm: Does that include the IPCC? ' No best estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity can now be given because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and studies.' http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session36/p36_doc3_approved_spm.pdf But they have high confidence in the warming. If climate sensitivity to CO2 is so uncertain, how can you have high confidence in an outcome? You cant. Its purely a guess at this stage

Aint that the truth!

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10^th, 2014 at 2:29pm:

lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2014 at 2:08pm: Does that include the IPCC? ' No best estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity can now be given because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and studies.' http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session36/p36_doc3_approved_spm.pdf But they have high confidence in the warming. If climate sensitivity to CO2 is so uncertain, how can you have high confidence in an outcome? You cant. Its purely a guess at this stage

Well, if a major satellite that was due to contribute to that data failed to reach orbit, then  trying to define that particular parameter would be a guess, wouldn't it?

No data, so they don't guess. Sounds like an honest response to me. I notice that you don't provide the context.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10^th, 2014 at 2:33pm:

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 9:58pm: lee wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 8:18pm: The heading says RECORD COLD. Please provide a link of scientists predicting RECORD COLD. You will be waiting till hell freezes over for that link  ;D                                          :o http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-01-08/in-pictures-us-weather-when-hell-froze-over/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCdjvTTnzDU&list=RDDGegWzI0Pvs

Bit of a subtle message for the desperate conservatives.

Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9^th, 2014 at 9:58pm:

You will be waiting till hell freezes over for that link  ;D

Well, it looks like you waited an hour for DNA to provide a link, and I don't believe in Hell, but if you do, then maybe you could check it if has frozen over yet.

Quote:

Er·e·bus  (r-bs) n. Greek Mythology The dark region of the underworld through which the dead must pass before they reach Hades. Erebus, Mount A volcanic peak, 3,796.6 m (12,448 ft) high, on Ross Island in Antarctica.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4e/Mt_erebus.jpg/560px-Mt_erebus.jpg

Dnarever wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:51pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 10th, 2014 at 2:33pm: Innocent bystander wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 9:58pm: lee wrote on Jan 9th, 2014 at 8:18pm: The heading says RECORD COLD. Please provide a link of scientists predicting RECORD COLD. You will be waiting till hell freezes over for that link  ;D                                          :o http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-01-08/in-pictures-us-weather-when-hell-froze-over/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCdjvTTnzDU&list=RDDGegWzI0Pvs Bit of a subtle message for the desperate conservatives.

There's not enough Don Henley in this forum.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:57pm:

There's not enough Don Henley in this forum.

Finally something that we agree on. Desperado is one of my favourites. I can play most of the Eagles numbers, and can sing most these days as long as they transpose them down a couple of notches. I can sing Desperado in the original G.

Looks like you drew the Queen of Diamonds once too often, boy.

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 8:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12th, 2014 at 7:57pm: There's not enough Don Henley in this forum. Finally something that we agree on. Desperado is one of my favourites. I can play most of the Eagles numbers, and can sing most these days as long as they transpose them down a couple of notches. I can sing Desperado in the original G. Looks like you drew the Queen of Diamonds once too often, boy.

I can see you ...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap4jRRK75dA

muso wrote on Jan 12^th, 2014 at 7:47pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 10th, 2014 at 2:29pm: lee wrote on Jan 10th, 2014 at 2:08pm: Does that include the IPCC? ' No best estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity can now be given because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and studies.' http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session36/p36_doc3_approved_spm.pdf But they have high confidence in the warming. If climate sensitivity to CO2 is so uncertain, how can you have high confidence in an outcome? You cant. Its purely a guess at this stage Well, if a major satellite that was due to contribute to that data failed to reach orbit, then  trying to define that particular parameter would be a guess, wouldn't it? No data, so they don't guess. Sounds like an honest response to me. I notice that you don't provide the context.

When the IPCC don't provide context, neither can I. Are you second guessing the IPCC?

This is what they said "because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and studies.' "

All govts involved must agree what goes in the reports: this is why all estimates are conservative!

:D

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 13^th, 2014 at 2:32am:

All govts involved must agree what goes in the reports: this is why all estimates are conservative! :D

What does that have to do with failed satellites?

lee wrote on Jan 13^th, 2014 at 10:17am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 13th, 2014 at 2:32am: All govts involved must agree what goes in the reports: this is why all estimates are conservative! :D What does that have to do with failed satellites?

In other words, it is not just a guess, it is purely political. IPCC is pathetic.

lee wrote on Jan 13^th, 2014 at 10:17am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 13th, 2014 at 2:32am: All govts involved must agree what goes in the reports: this is why all estimates are conservative! :D What does that have to do with failed satellites?

It was a general comment!

progressiveslol wrote on Jan 13^th, 2014 at 4:04pm:

lee wrote on Jan 13th, 2014 at 10:17am: BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 13th, 2014 at 2:32am: All govts involved must agree what goes in the reports: this is why all estimates are conservative! :D What does that have to do with failed satellites? In other words, it is not just a guess, it is purely political. IPCC is pathetic.

All human relations is politics: don't you read!??!

General Comment - We salute you. ;)