| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Victoria in the poo? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1379393549 Message started by Aussie on Sep 17th, 2013 at 2:52pm |
|
|
Title: Victoria in the poo? Post by Aussie on Sep 17th, 2013 at 2:52pm
Dunno if this is new, but it seems very reminiscent. Cods will be very annoyed and no doubt demanding that the Government resign.
|
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by salad in on Sep 17th, 2013 at 3:02pm Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 2:52pm:
Rubbish. It means he is well qualified to be an Australian politician. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Aussie on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:09pm
Does no-one care about Victoria? It has feelings too, you know!
|
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by adelcrow on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:12pm
Liberal state govt + Liberal Federal govt = DD..Double Disaster :D
|
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by bigvicfella on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:12pm Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:09pm:
interesting dilemma. If we are talking about Geoff Shaw, Napthine needs his independant vote to get his legislation through. If Geoff Goes - bye bye Libs. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Aussie on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:15pm Vic wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:12pm:
Of course we are talking about Geoff Shaw! It is in the embedded link in the OP. :) This is one for cods, because we know just how appalled she was that the Gillard ALP Government clung to power with the vote of Thomson who was in exactly the same position as Shaw now finds himself. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by bigvicfella on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:18pm Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:15pm:
I'm sorry - I can't see the embedded link. Then again my eyes are 61 years old! ;) |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by FriYAY on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:18pm
And so he should be charged.
A Victorian election would be interesting right now. The electorate was rightly pissed off with the unelected Brumby Govt. Ted B was about as dam useless as you can get. Napthine is interesting – seems to be going OK (not that I’ve seen any polls etc) but Andrews seems to have a lot less to say these days. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by cods on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:19pm Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 2:52pm:
I do not recall calling for the resignation of the gillard govt btw...perhaps you also could refrain from the lies on that score. has Shaw been supported for over 12 months???... considered innocent until proven.... I believe is the great labor go???... I am sure you are the only ones interested.. my major concern was WIDOWS FUNDS that disappeared up someone elses bank account.. something lefties showed not one iota of interest in... when he gets charged with 176 chgs whilst sitting on the benches let us know aussie... btw in all seriousness...I am disgusted with what goes on and seems to be allowed to go..... its never ending. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Aussie on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:20pm Vic wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:18pm:
Just about anything I post which is in red you should 'click' on the red word, and you will see the link. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by cods on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:21pm Vic wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:18pm:
try the red THIS before aussie gets up you.. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by cods on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:22pm Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:20pm:
that came up after i posted aussie.. sorry how come you didnt get up Vic... now thats showing bias.... aussie can you explain to me how you do that???.. I cannot even get a red address on here... ::) |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Aussie on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:27pm
[url (insert the sign =)http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/latest/a/-/article/18973903/vic-mp-geoff-shaw-facing-23-charges/]type the word you want here[/url]
Note the [ at the commencement of the URL........the ] at the end of the URL............and the [/url] after the words you want to insert. Also note.....you do not type '(insert the sign =)' you just put =. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Aussie on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:33pm Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:27pm:
Or you use [url][/url] which is the globe thingy icon at the left of that bar ^^^^ you see when you type a reply. You insert the actual URL between the and type what you want here |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Bam on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:58pm Vic wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:12pm:
Yes, they need his vote to remain in government. This is eerily similar to the recent Craig Thomson business. The numbers are similarly tight - 43-43 + Speaker + Shaw. The imperilled MP has resigned from their party. The imperilled MP has been charged with criminal offences. Sound familiar? For the Liberals, this could get very ugly, very quickly. The worst-case scenario is that the Liberals will not even make it to the fixed-term election that is due in 14 months. Frankston has a margin of only 1.71% and can easily fall to Labor in a by-election. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by True Colours on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:28pm
Will the liberal Party think twice before endorsing nutty Evangelical Christians in the future?
Prolly Shaw was in the wrong party - he would have been better suited to the Rise Up Australia Party. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by alevine on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:29pm FriYAY wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:18pm:
WTF are you on? 1. Brumby wasn't unelected. 2. Brumby was a disrespectful imbecile. 3. Bailleiu was seen as do nothing because he never spoke to the media. But Bailleiu was actually good in my books. It's a shame for once a politician just wants to do their job, and still that's not good enough. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Bam on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:36pm
Here is another article on this festering fiasco.
Victorian Independent MP Geoff Shaw charged over use of taxpayer-funded car I quote the last two paragraphs of the article below: Quote:
The Victorian Government is doomed. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Bam on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:47pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:29pm:
Brumby took over from Bracks mid-term and lost the following election. He never actually won an election as Premier. Quote:
That is a matter of opinion. Quote:
Baillieu was pathetic because he refused to be accountable. He went to ground whenever there was a scandal big or small and gave the Opposition a clear run to denounce the latest wrongdoing. His satisfaction rating dived faster than an anvil pushed off a cliff and his government's rating dived with it, plunging from 57-43 to 45-55 in a little more than a year (Newspoll). The Coalition are polling better with Napthine as leader but they have not done better than 51-49 in any Newspoll for two years. This is lower than their 2010 election result of 51.6-48.4. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by alevine on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:57pm Bam wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:47pm:
Baillieu was pathetic because he refused to be accountable. He went to ground whenever there was a scandal big or small and gave the Opposition a clear run to denounce the latest wrongdoing. His satisfaction rating dived faster than an anvil pushed off a cliff and his government's rating dived with it, plunging from 57-43 to 45-55 in a little more than a year (Newspoll). The Coalition are polling better with Napthine as leader but they have not done better than 51-49 in any Newspoll for two years. This is lower than their 2010 election result of 51.6-48.4. [/quote] True it is a matter of opinion whether brumby was a smug prick or not. But the election result in Victoria was not one of "it's time." it was more because of people's dislike of brumby. So I'd say the matter of opinion is more swayed towards him being a prick. And good riddance to him. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Bam on Sep 18th, 2013 at 7:53pm |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by True Colours on Sep 18th, 2013 at 8:02pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:57pm:
Labor had been in power for more than 11 years. Not many governments in Australia go for more than 11 years. sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:57pm:
I found him inoffensive - perhaps not as likeable as his predecessor though. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Bam on Sep 19th, 2013 at 12:38pm
Bimonthly Newspoll has put Labor at 51-49. This Newspoll is an aggregate of the last two months, so the latest developments in the Shaw affair have little bearing on this poll.
Also, margin of error, blah blah blah. More details here: Newspoll: 51-49 to Labor in Victoria (Crikey - Poll Bludger) |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by John Smith on Sep 19th, 2013 at 12:44pm Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:33pm:
just testing take 2 [url = testing ]http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/latest/a/-/article/18973903/vic-mp-geoff-shaw-facing-23-charges/[/url] take 3 [url]http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/latest/a/-/article/18973903/vic-mp-geoff-shaw-facing-23-charges/[=testing/url] take 4 http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/latest/a/-/article/18973903/vic-mp-geoff-shaw-facing-23-charges/ take 5 .... getting closer [url = testing]http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/latest/a/-/article/18973903/vic-mp-geoff-shaw-facing-23-charges/[/url] |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by John Smith on Sep 19th, 2013 at 12:51pm
I give up ... I'll try again later
|
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by adelcrow on Sep 19th, 2013 at 1:06pm
The Libs have stuffed up WA, NSW, Queensland and Victoria and now we've let them loose on the Australian economy...heaven help us all :D
|
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by FriYAY on Sep 19th, 2013 at 1:12pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 5:29pm:
Excuse dam me? Brumby took over from Bracks - no election. Brumby lost his 1st election to Ted the Dud. Have another biscuit detor.... ::) |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Bam on Oct 8th, 2013 at 8:18am |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by buzzanddidj on Oct 8th, 2013 at 10:19am Vic wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 4:18pm:
Aussie wrote on Sep 17th, 2013 at 2:52pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by perceptions_now on Oct 8th, 2013 at 12:09pm
I re-post the following here, as it is relevant.
perceptions_now wrote on Oct 8th, 2013 at 12:06pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by bigvicfella on Oct 10th, 2013 at 10:01am
Leaving for other reasons be blowed! The first of many Lib rats leaving the good ship Victoria - what a shame this wont cause a byelection.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/liberal-mp-philip-davis-to-quit-after-21-years-in-parliament/story-fni0fit3-1226736624837 |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by philperth2010 on Oct 10th, 2013 at 10:20am
Either way both sides of Politics are proving to be hypocrites and self serving parasites on the taxpayer....Thomson and Shaw have both shown the Governing body will do anything to hold on to power and the individuals themselves show little remorse for their actions!!!
>:( >:( >:( |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Aussie on Oct 15th, 2013 at 4:52pm
This bloke Shaw is a bit of a legend it seems, assaulting 80 year olds today.
Charming fella. |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by adelcrow on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:06pm Aussie wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 4:52pm:
Phony Tony will get jealous |
|
Title: Re: Victoria in the poo? Post by Bam on Oct 15th, 2013 at 5:11pm Aussie wrote on Oct 15th, 2013 at 4:52pm:
Here is a link: MP Geoff Shaw involved in scuffle on Parliament steps |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |