Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Sport >> Warnie back for the Ashes?
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1354671537

Message started by Swagman on Dec 5th, 2012 at 11:38am

Title: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Swagman on Dec 5th, 2012 at 11:38am
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/cricket/shane-warne-says-pick-me-to-take-on-england-in-the-ashes/story-e6frey50-1226530000185

Warnie come back for the Ashes would be great. [smiley=tekst-toppie.gif]

Pity he wasn't around to tackle the Boks.... :(

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Jasignature on Dec 9th, 2012 at 2:49am
More like him spruiking himself in the Media limelight again - just to be seen with his new makeover.

Him and his ex-wife used to do it all the time for the magazines ...seperated, back together, seperated again, back together again, seperated, on and on and on.

Peter Garrett was a great Singer/songwriter, etc
but not as good as a Political figure.
Warnie was a great Cricket player but after that - he is just an embarressing knob like Warwick Capper.

I would be insulted if I was on the team - some bygone legend expecting to come back for the Ashes ...as if my fellow team-mates and I were not up to the challenge.

George Piggins EGO of yesteryear always the best years was what ruined the 'future' of South Sydney for some time.

F off Warnie you wanker!!!

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by philperth2010 on Dec 13th, 2012 at 6:50pm
Warne is a very good bowler but he retired.....He should stay retired and leave the game to people who put in the work required at the top level.....Australian cricket needs to get over Shane Warne....I know I have!!!

::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Swagman on Dec 13th, 2012 at 8:15pm

philperth2010 wrote on Dec 13th, 2012 at 6:50pm:
Warne is a very good bowler but he retired.....He should stay retired and leave the game to people who put in the work required at the top level.....Australian cricket needs to get over Shane Warne....I know I have!!!

::) ::) ::)


If you're good enough you're good enough no matter what age.

Bob Simpson made a comeback at 41 having not played first class cricket for 10 years.  Scored 100 in the first test & 176 in the 4th Test V India in 77/78.  Averaged 53 for the series with 2 hundreds & 2 50s... :)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Jasignature on Dec 13th, 2012 at 8:42pm
Yes but he stayed within the Cricketing circles, rather than cavort like a Wanker via the Media with whores, gambling, etc  like Warwick Capper and Shane Warne have. I don't think he even had an earing for his luvo ego.
But maybe Warne should come back - it seems most of Australian Sport is filled with wanker guys these days.

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by philperth2010 on Dec 15th, 2012 at 11:08am

Swagman wrote on Dec 13th, 2012 at 8:15pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Dec 13th, 2012 at 6:50pm:
Warne is a very good bowler but he retired.....He should stay retired and leave the game to people who put in the work required at the top level.....Australian cricket needs to get over Shane Warne....I know I have!!!

::) ::) ::)


If you're good enough you're good enough no matter what age.

Bob Simpson made a comeback at 41 having not played first class cricket for 10 years.  Scored 100 in the first test & 176 in the 4th Test V India in 77/78.  Averaged 53 for the series with 2 hundreds & 2 50s... :)


Simpson came back because of WSC otherwise there is no way he would have played for Australia again.....If Shane Warne wants to put in the work required and meet the requirements for selection then he should be considered.....If Shane Warne wants to walk into the Australian side based on his reputation and celebrity then it will never happen!!!

:) :) :)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Dec 15th, 2012 at 6:10pm
If Warne is fit to play a five day game (and there is doubt about that) he gets a rail's run into the Team.

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Dec 16th, 2012 at 8:11pm
Wade is not a Test Keeper.  That stumping he missed today was elementary.  His footwork sucks, his timing sucks, he fails to stay low (easier to rise than drop......notice how his gloves were above the ball when he missed that stumping) and he show pony's with exaggerated movement when he already has the ball in the gloves.  He is okay.....but not a Test Keeper.

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Amadd on Dec 19th, 2012 at 9:02pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 16th, 2012 at 8:11pm:
Wade is not a Test Keeper.  That stumping he missed today was elementary.  His footwork sucks, his timing sucks, he fails to stay low (easier to rise than drop......notice how his gloves were above the ball when he missed that stumping) and he show pony's with exaggerated movement when he already has the ball in the gloves.  He is okay.....but not a Test Keeper.


I agree, Wade needs to lift his game behind the stumps.
He's missing way too many chances, and I consider every missed chance that a better keeper would have taken to be requiring at least another 20 runs with the bat from him.




Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Amadd on Dec 26th, 2012 at 11:11pm
A great display from Wade today. Hopefully he's turned the corner.

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Swagman on Dec 27th, 2012 at 8:06am
.....hope he gets some runs today too

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Dec 27th, 2012 at 12:38pm

Amadd wrote on Dec 26th, 2012 at 11:11pm:
A great display from Wade today. Hopefully he's turned the corner.


I disagree.  The very first catch....where was his footwork?  A simple cross step and a half, he has the ball and he is on his feet.  What did he do?  He did not move his feet, and was on his pads taking the catch.  The catch running back?  Well, that is not a 'keeper's catch.  It was very well caught, but not a wicket-keeping effort.

Wade = 1 run. 

Nah.

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Amadd on Dec 27th, 2012 at 1:53pm

Quote:
Wade = 1 run. 
   ;D

Turned the corner and run into a brick wall  :(


Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Dec 27th, 2012 at 2:52pm
Nah!



"All tip and no iceberg."




He does not watch the ball.  He assumes the batsman will hit it, and his eyes go there.

Nah!

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Jan 12th, 2013 at 6:31pm
One of the differences between Wade and Haddin:



Haddin has the ball in his glove.  Up there ^^^^^ Wade's is empty.

;)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Amadd on Jan 13th, 2013 at 12:01pm
No doubt that Haddin is the better keeper, but he's 35.

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Jan 13th, 2013 at 1:58pm
So, when Wade is a better keeper than an ageing Haddin, if by then there is no-one better, then he gets the gig, not before.

:)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Amadd on Jan 13th, 2013 at 8:59pm
Oh well, now he's 35 and out with a hammie.
Looks like Wade will be back unless they put their faith in Hughes.

That was a B-side tonight.

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Jan 14th, 2013 at 3:34pm

Amadd wrote on Jan 13th, 2013 at 8:59pm:
Oh well, now he's 35 and out with a hammie.
Looks like Wade will be back unless they put their faith in Hughes.

That was a B-side tonight.


Hughes is only a part-timer.  Yes, if Haddin fails to recover, it enhances Ward's chances of making the England Tour.....but he really is below par at the moment.  As I think I have already posted...(Keating)..'All tip and no iceberg,' and I have provided photographic proof ^^^^^^^.

;)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Amadd on Jan 14th, 2013 at 6:25pm
Hughes may be a part-timer but he kept really well for 30 overs or so.
He could be a backup for Warne, or was that Ward, or Wade...now I'm confused, that all tip and no iceberg guy  :D

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Amadd on Jan 16th, 2013 at 11:07pm
OMG! How many ways could the Melb. Stars find to throw away that match against Perth?
I know it's only hit and giggle but still not a fitting end for Warnie.
And both Melbourne sides out on their ass  >:(

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Jan 17th, 2013 at 5:00pm

Amadd wrote on Jan 16th, 2013 at 11:07pm:
OMG! How many ways could the Melb. Stars find to throw away that match against Perth?
I know it's only hit and giggle but still not a fitting end for Warnie.
And both Melbourne sides out on their ass  >:(


And Warnie is in the poo again.......I guess you are from Melbourne.  Brisbane Heat are there!

:)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by philperth2010 on Jan 17th, 2013 at 8:56pm
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/liz-hurley-in-catfight-with-channel-10-journo-caty-price/story-fndo486p-1226555800058


Quote:
LIZ Hurley has been accused of pushing and swearing at a popular television sports reporter at Perth Airport this morning.
Media at the airport were interviewing Shane Warne in the wake of his Melbourne Stars' thriller against the Perth Scorchers in the BBL last night when Channel 10's Caty Price was shoved and told to “bugger off” by the actress.

Price told 6PR Radio this morning that Ms Hurley “walked into the back of me” and said it was “rude to stand in front of people”.

"I then asked her, ‘Liz what did you think of the game last night?’ and she spun around on her heels and said ‘I think you should...’ mouthed to me close up to my face ‘F off.’,” Price said.

"And then (she) did another spin and flick of the hair and strutted off with Shane.”

  .
The entire incident was captured on camera.
Price said she had never had an issue with Ms Hurley in the past.

"We didn’t approach her at all at the airport and normally I wouldn’t have asked her anything except she sort of pushed us out of the way initially,” Price said.

"I thought... may as well throw a question at her.”

"That wasn’t what I was excepting this morning and probably not what I would have thought from an English lady.”



English lady.....

[smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif]

Lets face it.....Warne is a dickhead and so is his missus!!!

:) :) :)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Jan 17th, 2013 at 9:03pm
Yeah.  And who gained from it?  I would have told her to bugger off as well.

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by philperth2010 on Jan 17th, 2013 at 10:40pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 17th, 2013 at 9:03pm:
Yeah.  And who gained from it?  I would have told her to bugger off as well.


Of course you would!!!

[smiley=beer.gif] [smiley=beer.gif] [smiley=beer.gif]

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by philperth2010 on Jan 17th, 2013 at 10:43pm
Warnie and Lizzie are all over the media when things are going well (as if we really care).....Then when Warnie proves what a tosser he really is once again he carries on like a Prima Donna.....The Blondie reporter seamed very pleased with the both of them!!!

:) :) :)

Title: Re: Warnie back for the Ashes?
Post by Aussie on Jan 18th, 2013 at 3:57pm
Of course she is.  Hence my comment ^^^^ about who gained from it.


Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.