JULIA SHOULD HAVE PAID OFF RALPH... he was the only one she didn't

Julia Gillard as a lawyer promoted the bona fides of her client, the AWU, in order to steal from them. Then, when union members started to complain, she shut them down with a writ.

Massive fraud was committed on her own company’s client, the AWU, and her own company, Slater & Gordon, tried to hide the fraud from its own client. They were successful for almost a year.

Bruce Wilson and Julia Gillard were as thick as thieves yet Bonnie now says Clyde’s activities were unbeknown to her. Yeah, right.

Clyde could not have operated without Bonnie’s full cooperation. She was legally integral to the entire ongoing operation. No crime would or could have been committed without her.

Of course Bonnie partook of the proceeds of crime. Even she says, “I can’t rule that out”.

Bonnie is now our Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, and her supporters in the media have told us to, “move on folks, there’s nothing to see here”.

The full story is spelt out in all its glory in the “The Gillard Files” on Pickering Post. It has been sitting there for some months. The ALP and the media knew it was there and purposely ignored it.

Gillard, as Prime Minister, set about paying off those who could incriminate her:

Bernard Murphy, senior equity partner in Slater & Gordon (who hurriedly departed S & G at the same time as Gillard was sacked) was promoted, leapfrogging the magistracy, to a Judge on the Bench of the Federal Court. Incredibly, he is still there. A crook sitting in judgment on crooks! Golly!

Nicola Roxon who assisted in secreting Gillard’s personal files at Maurice Blackburn was promoted, unqualified, to Attorney General. All the files have now disappeared. Her ineptness as A.G. has been demonstrated by the Ashby affair.

Roxon’s live-in partner AWU National Secretary, Bill Shorten, who was privy to the extensive fraud and responsible for burying it, was given a Ministry.

much more
http://pickeringpost.com/article/julia-should-have-paid-off-ralph...-he-was-the-only-one-she-didnt/744

This is pretty direct from pickering this time, even more so than I thought he could be. Will Gillard go after this time.

is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering?

;D ;D ;D

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:19pm:

is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D

What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz.

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:21pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz.

Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide. 

Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:22pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D

kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:21pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz.

progs I think you kicked yourself in the head so many times over that debate that you cannot think clearly anymore ... you are having problems with you're recollection ....

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:23pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :(

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:25pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:23pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :(

We should change your name to kickzownazzz or lastwordwarrior

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:29pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:23pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :( We should change your name to kickzownazzz or lastwordwarrior

:( No documentation yet claim to have it. All you have is insults :(  No credibility :( just insults :(

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:29pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:23pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :( We should change your name to kickzownazzz or lastwordwarrior

what are you changing your name too? looser? or would you prefer liar?

(it depends on if you willingly and knowingly wrote those untruths, or if you actually believed it at the time of writing ... the former is the liar, the later is the looser ... my money is on looser ......)

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:32pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:29pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:23pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :( We should change your name to kickzownazzz or lastwordwarrior what are you changing your name too? looser? or would you prefer liar? (it depends on if you willingly and knowingly wrote those untruths, or if you actually believed it at the time of writing ... the former is the liar, the later is the looser ... my money is on looser ......)

Well, you would have to prove you can comprehend the written english language first. With that being unlikely, you are going to be disappointed for some time.

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:34pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:32pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:29pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:23pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :( We should change your name to kickzownazzz or lastwordwarrior what are you changing your name too? looser? or would you prefer liar? (it depends on if you willingly and knowingly wrote those untruths, or if you actually believed it at the time of writing ... the former is the liar, the later is the looser ... my money is on looser ......) Well, you would have to prove you can comprehend the written english language first. With that being unlikely, you are going to be disappointed for some time.

ohh, your concern is touching ... but don't worry, I understand enough that you can choose either option ... so which one is it ? Liar? or LOOSER?

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:37pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:34pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:32pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:29pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:23pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :( We should change your name to kickzownazzz or lastwordwarrior what are you changing your name too? looser? or would you prefer liar? (it depends on if you willingly and knowingly wrote those untruths, or if you actually believed it at the time of writing ... the former is the liar, the later is the looser ... my money is on looser ......) Well, you would have to prove you can comprehend the written english language first. With that being unlikely, you are going to be disappointed for some time. ohh, your concern is touching ... but don't worry, I understand enough that you can choose either option ... so which one is it ? Liar? or LOOSER?

looks like the other mental heavyweight really doesnt need the name of lastwordwarrior. How long do you think alevine will last?

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:37pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:34pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:32pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:29pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:23pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :( We should change your name to kickzownazzz or lastwordwarrior what are you changing your name too? looser? or would you prefer liar? (it depends on if you willingly and knowingly wrote those untruths, or if you actually believed it at the time of writing ... the former is the liar, the later is the looser ... my money is on looser ......) Well, you would have to prove you can comprehend the written english language first. With that being unlikely, you are going to be disappointed for some time. ohh, your concern is touching ... but don't worry, I understand enough that you can choose either option ... so which one is it ? Liar? or LOOSER? looks like the other mental heavyweight really doesnt need the name of lastwordwarrior. How long do you think alevine will last?

ok, I'll make it even easier for you

A)  LIAR
B)  LOOSER

A or B .... choose one

John Smith wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 9:45pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:43pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:37pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:34pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:32pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:29pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:25pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:23pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:21pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:19pm: is this the documentation you were referring to? From Pickering? ;D ;D ;D What documentation is that. Is that the one where you were one quote away from kicking your own Azzzz. Nope, it's the documentation you claim is freely available and yet can't seem to provide.  Liar ;D  Keep reading Pickering. It's fitting. ;D kicking your own Azzzz.  ;D ;D ;D ;D Such a shame that you have lost all your credibility.   :( We should change your name to kickzownazzz or lastwordwarrior what are you changing your name too? looser? or would you prefer liar? (it depends on if you willingly and knowingly wrote those untruths, or if you actually believed it at the time of writing ... the former is the liar, the later is the looser ... my money is on looser ......) Well, you would have to prove you can comprehend the written english language first. With that being unlikely, you are going to be disappointed for some time. ohh, your concern is touching ... but don't worry, I understand enough that you can choose either option ... so which one is it ? Liar? or LOOSER? looks like the other mental heavyweight really doesnt need the name of lastwordwarrior. How long do you think alevine will last? ok, I'll make it even easier for you A)  LIAR B)  LOOSER A or B .... choose one

;D ;D ;D ;D

alevines head is exploding right now. someone had better get the paramedics to his computer ASAP

Again, not one iota of proof.

Certain people hold certain positions, therefore Julia is guilty. How about you explicitly identify Julia's alleged wrongdoing and then provide the evidence.

MOTR wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 5:03am:

Again, not one iota of proof. Certain people hold certain positions, therefore Julia is guilty. How about you explicitly identify Julia's alleged wrongdoing and then provide the evidence.

I dont think pickering reads this forum, so it would be unlikely for him to post a reply to your request.

MOTR wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 5:03am:

Again, not one iota of proof. Certain people hold certain positions, therefore Julia is guilty. How about you explicitly identify Julia's alleged wrongdoing and then provide the evidence.

MOTA when she convened her journo meeting to answer questions on her G&S days.. it was done in 2 hours..she called the meeting knowing full well no editor would have the time to get the right questions in.... for all we know she could also have had forewarning about said questions..

it happens we all know that..

how ever she is now being asked different questions in the house...and she keeps claiming she has already answered said questions..

which isnt quite true!!!!!!!!!

I would think instead of abusing the opposition for daring to ask such questions..she would take the opportunity to hit them where it hurts and shut them up once and for all...

by telling the truth and clearing the air.in parliament where it really counts..

she has nothing to hide she claims..

so come on jules tell us the truth..

pickering obviously has something up his sleeve.. he is goading and saying some terrible things about her....

they shut up Smith sort of and milne..by costing them their jobs..

she should call a Royal Comm into this and be done with it..she must have some concern about the money and where it went surely???

the Unions will never bring it on thats for sure..

progs, i'm one person who is a bit "not that interested in corruption'
i would rather a pollie who was a "accepting a few of the perks" but ruthlessly efficient with the taxpayers money
than a saint who squandered billions on sh#t.

and its the second crime that i would accuse labour of.

whilst wasting taxpayers money isnt a crime, its still the thing we have to fear most from numpty land.

i think someone posted about labors desal in vic (same in qld) costing so many million a DAY for the next 30 years.
now that figure , for one dumb decision , is probably more costly than all the graft in political circles in the history of australia.

so i hope julia and wayne get hammered for their criminal waste.
the problem is, tony doesnt seem any better.
he's a big spender.

i shall go fishing on election day so i can criticize both sides without hypocricy.

i just wish they'd let me get my hands on that treasury for 6 months. i'd whip these clowns into shape mercilessly.

cods wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 6:50am:

MOTR wrote on Nov 5th, 2012 at 5:03am: Again, not one iota of proof. Certain people hold certain positions, therefore Julia is guilty. How about you explicitly identify Julia's alleged wrongdoing and then provide the evidence. MOTA when she convened her journo meeting to answer questions on her G&S days.. it was done in 2 hours..she called the meeting knowing full well no editor would have the time to get the right questions in.... for all we know she could also have had forewarning about said questions.. it happens we all know that.. how ever she is now being asked different questions in the house...and she keeps claiming she has already answered said questions.. which isnt quite true!!!!!!!!! I would think instead of abusing the opposition for daring to ask such questions..she would take the opportunity to hit them where it hurts and shut them up once and for all... by telling the truth and clearing the air.in parliament where it really counts.. she has nothing to hide she claims.. so come on jules tell us the truth.. pickering obviously has something up his sleeve.. he is goading and saying some terrible things about her.... they shut up Smith sort of and milne..by costing them their jobs.. she should call a Royal Comm into this and be done with it..she must have some concern about the money and where it went surely??? the Unions will never bring it on thats for sure..

rubbish ... any political journalist worth his salt would be up to date with all the claims out there and know what questions they need to ask. ... sure,I don't deny that more time would let refine what they wanted to say, but neverthelkess, any issues outstanding they needed answers to would have been dealt with.

As maqqa says your IP is logged, prog, you and maqqa can share a cell. ;D

Hahahahahaha @ the armchair warrior that thinks he can do better than the government @ running the country. Seriously there is a lot of stuff they dont tell us.

SOB

skippy. wrote on Nov 5^th, 2012 at 8:08am:

As maqqa says your IP is logged, prog, you and maqqa can share a cell. ;D

Thats excellent skip. Whats gives us the honor in sharing a cell full of money?