Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:21am
progressiveslol, kindly buy this shirt for yourself.
Given you've admitted to being an idiot.
Given you've admitted to being an idiot.
| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1351925740 Message started by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:55pm |
|
|
Title: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:55pm
Progressiveslol claims to have documentation relating to Gillard's guilt in the AWU scandal. Yet he won't provide it to prove to all of us that he is right and most importantly that a crime has been committed by Gillard :(. Why? Why would progressiveslol discredit himself like this?
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1351812382/45 |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:56pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:
Hey you could just ask me. What a radical idea. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:57pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:56pm:
You could just provide documentation you claim to possess. And I already tried - seems you don't know yourself why you won't provide it :( |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:57pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:57pm:
What documentation is that exactly. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:59pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:57pm:
The documentation you claim to possess. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1351812382/45 |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:00pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:59pm:
You will need to be a bit more specific. I dont possess any documentation. I have however presented many many links. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:01pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:00pm:
So you lied then? So there is no documentation? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:03pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:01pm:
You will need to describe what documentation you require. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:04pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:03pm:
The documentation you spoke of here: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1351812382/45 Not really that difficult my friend. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:05pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:04pm:
But when I referred to documentation, I was not specific. You will need to be specific in order for me to contemplate if I will retrieve the link to it. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by BigOl64 on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:05pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:59pm:
Just read through that entire post can't see where prog stated that he had documented evidence. I did see a puerile demand for some poo or other, based on a question posed by prog. Seems just another stupid post generated from an inability to comprehend basic english. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:08pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:05pm:
This wasn't specific? Quote:
Provide it please. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:09pm BigOl64 wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:05pm:
Well I suggest you get a better comprehension of english then. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:11pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:08pm:
Gillard has signed many documents. Which one are you after exactly. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:12pm
Alevine is correct, prog made all sorts of claims about this over the past months but in particular last couple of days, surly it can't be hard for him to provide links to this document he clearly states is available
for public access, he says it exists, where is it? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:14pm skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:12pm:
claims of what skip. Most of what I put on here about this subject is a direct cut and paste. You would need to be a bit more specific as well. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:16pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:11pm:
THe one you're referring to when you say Quote:
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:17pm
Now everyone needs to be more specific for progs. Seems you can't keep your lies straight. Despicable.
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by BigOl64 on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:17pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:09pm:
This is the the quote you are referring to and the initial demand from Aussie.. Quote:
"Is that what" is the beginning of a question and without the question mark at the end of the sentence you could just accept it as a rhetorical question. But maybe english is your second language and you don't understand the structure of questions. So stop being a petulant tool and find an adult conversation to join into. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:18pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:16pm:
[/quote] But that was not being specific. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:19pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:18pm:
But that was not being specific.[/quote] of course it was. Provide it please. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:21pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:19pm:
of course it was. Provide it please. [/quote] what. lol. How about you research. It is good that you have taken a shine to the subject and want knowledge about it. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:22pm BigOl64 wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:17pm:
First I've heard that rhetorical questions can be accepted without question marks. Re-writing english are we? Progressives may just have bad grammar, and it so happens that in a forum like this that should never matter (at least not to those willing to have a debate rather than pick up on how a person writes). Not rhetorical. Progressives claims there is some documentation out there. I'm asking for it. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:23pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:
what. lol. How about you research. It is good that you have taken a shine to the subject and want knowledge about it. [/quote] Why do I need to research the documentation you claim you have seen? If you have seen it, provide it! Not that hard. Why are you trying to make it so difficult to prove YOUR OWN POINT? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by BigOl64 on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:34pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:22pm:
You do realise I used the word "could" didn't you, doesn't quite mean I'm rewriting the english language now does it? It does mean it is an option you could take if you were being an adult about the whole situation. Prog made no such claim, the very fact the the sentence is framed as a question, rhetorical or otherwise means it was not a claim of ownership or direct knowledge. Anyone with a pass in Grade 5 english comprehension would be able to understand that I'm all for a debate, but not with a churlish demand as the premise for that debate. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:37pm BigOl64 wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:34pm:
Even if it was rhetorical it only solidifies that progressive is aware of some documentation. We are asking him to share it with us. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by BigOl64 on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:45pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:37pm:
No it was a question, not a statement, so you cannot on that basis make any demands. If I ask you a question you cannot demand I hand over the proof that supports or disproves the question I posed. That would be friggen stupid. If someone poses a question, you can answer it or not. That's it. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:16pm
;D :P :-*
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by MOTR on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:17pm
It's quite clear there is no documentation. The matter has been dealt with by the appropriate authorities and this is just a dirty smear campaign. Abbott is gutlessly hiding behind his deputy's skirts at the moment, but it won't stop his approval rating plunging even further. Abbott did promise us this would be the filthiest campaign ever.
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:25pm BigOl64 wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:45pm:
Rhetorical question of course I can demand. It implies he knows the answer in which case I'm asking him to produce the documentation that has provided him his answer |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:29pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:
Progressiveslol seems to make a habit of telling lies and then running away like a little girl when asked to provide evudence. On another thread, he has claimed that there are "other factors" are that have caused the actic ice cap to decrease, global glacial mass balance to decrease and sea levels to rise which don't involve. global warming. He has been asked to tell us what these "other factors" are but he runs away. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1350660319/157#157 It is difficult to tell if he is genuinely dishonest - or simply so stupid that he thinks he can write crap and get away with it. He is probably best ignored as a waste of space. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:32pm rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:29pm:
If you dont know what other factors apart from CO2, then you should not be debating climate change natural or man-made. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:34pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 5:21pm:
what. lol. How about you research. It is good that you have taken a shine to the subject and want knowledge about it. [/quote] Oh look!!!! It is the "Oh no - I have been caught telling lies" answer again!!! Progs uses that a lot. He did it here too: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:52am:
Liars always suggest other people need to find evidence to support the lies that they have been telling. Honest people simply cut-and-paste the evidence for everyone to seen. We can all see what you are Progs. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by MOTR on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:36pm rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:29pm:
He is more interested in appearing to be right than being right. When he gets caught out he'll play rhetorical games rather than answering direct questions or providing evidence to support his ridiculous claims. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:36pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:32pm:
Go back to that thread and answer the question Progs. Don't run away. Meanwhile - you have been asked to provide evidence to support your statements in this thread. Try being honest for a change Progs. Show the evidence - or admit that you have been lying. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:46pm
There is a method to my madness and you will thank me one day. ;)
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by MOTR on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 7:11pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:46pm:
Sure we will, progs. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 8:35pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 6:46pm:
No one is accusing you of being mad. You are being accused of being a liar. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by Maqqa on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:16am
3 days ago Bishop tried to table to cheque Gillard signed - but Labor, Greens and Independent voted against it
why won't they allow proof to be tabled in parliament but their little leftards are calling for documentation on public forums |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by cods on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:39am Maqqa wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:16am:
like why dont they go on insight or even Q&A and ask those questions... makes me laugh when they think anyone on here has access to documents that some claim are missing.. if it isnt true why doesnt gillard say so in parliament....because she wouldnt dare thats why |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:42am
To answer the thread question, progressives lol is a liar, he can't prove me wrong.
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:44am skippy. wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:42am:
I didnt lie to you skip. Blewitt did not get a mortgage on his home like a normal person would. But as for you thinking I am a liar, I really am not concerned. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:50am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:44am:
You are a liar, you claim you had documentation Gillard signed, post it up or live with your title as the forums biggest liar. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:52am skippy. wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:50am:
I dont have any documentation. I have many links to documentation. As for blewitt, he never did get that mortgage on his home like a normal person does, hey skippy. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:00am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:52am:
So you now admit you lied, good, I'm glad you have that off your chest. Why did you lie? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:05am Maqqa wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:16am:
Gumpy you must hate getting it wrong so many times , I have trouble trying to figure out who's dumber, you or progs .... people are asking progs to provide the documentation he claims exists .... if he hasn't seen it how does he know it exists? why has none of this documentation ever been handed to police ..... ? and while we are on it, why is Bishop trying to stir up mud rather than giving any evidence she has to police so she can concentrate on her job ??? Surely, as an honest law abiding citizen its her duty to provide any evidence to the proper authorities? Run Forrest Run ... you've got nothing ... again |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:09am skippy. wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:00am:
Well that would be true if I said I had documentation in my original question posed to you. Problem is, I never stated I personally hold documentation. Too bad skip, you seemed like you thought you were on a winner. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:09am John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:05am:
No, you just clearly have trouble with just about anything. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:14am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:09am:
Liar, Alevine even started a thread pointing out your lies, you're a liar, live with it, I'm not going to let you forget it until you piss off. You lied about me too yesterday, then backed down once you realised you could not produce evidence to back your lie up, piss off, or live with being labelled the forum liar EVERY POST YOU MAKE. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:14am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:09am:
you mean everything to do with the crap you put up .... if you have no documents, how do you know the documents exist? You are citing it as fact, when in fact you've no real idea ... admit it progs .. you put your foot in it and got caught out as a LIAR... again |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:15am John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:14am:
Have you ever heard of the internet. Hey, we are on it. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:17am skippy. wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:14am:
oh I C. This is about you believing alevine, not that I lied. I C. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:18am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:15am:
As usual not making sense. When are you going to produce the documentation? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:19am
Alvine provided links to your lies, I had already read them, one of them was addressed to me, suck it up.liar.
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:20am skippy. wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:19am:
What lie. I only see a question to you. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:21am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:20am:
Haha your rhetorical question, perhaps, implied you knew of documentation. Provide it plsase . |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:24am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:15am:
Lots of things on the internet ... not all of it true .. eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lizard_Man_of_Scape_Ore_Swamp or perhaps you'd prefer http://www.proofofaliens.net/ whats that got to do with you providing FACTS???? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:26am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:21am:
You will have to bring up the questions for me to see here on this thread. Quote skippy and then me. Lets see if we can help you guys out |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:26am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:21am:
I like the fact that he never once himself considered it a question, until Cods bought up the possibility ...now he thinks that was his get out of jail card ... Progs, if you had meant that as a question you would have said so as soon as someone first put up your quote .... LIAR |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:27am John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:24am:
He doesn't know. And given Michael smith can't help put words into his mouth he is completely lost and is uttering anything he thinks makes sense to weasel out of it. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:27am John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:26am:
I got to have my fun. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by cods on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:27am
wasnt Bishop waving a document in parliament wanting to table it.. and guess what they all ganged up and wouldnt allow it..
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY why not table it and let us all see it and shut this lot up on here... its a mystery why they dont want anything out in the open..if one is so innocent I would think thats exactly what they should do..THOMO claims he has heaps... so why cant we see it.. I know I wouldnt be waiting till it goes to court before showing anyone how innocent I am.. why should I pay lawyers... when I am innocent for gods sakes.. come on I want my PM to be innocent I dont care for lies or innuendo..its not a good look and makes us look like right burkes in the bush to overseas chums... WHAT WAS BISHOP WAVING AROUND IN PALRIAMENT???????? THATS WHAT i WANT TO KNOW, AND NOW THE LEFTIES ON HERE WANT TO KNOW AS WELL.. THATS A FIRST. :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:31am cods wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:27am:
I see comprehension is not your strong point ...we are asking to see the documents that progs claims exist ... how does he know what does and doesn't exist if he hasn't seen it? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:32am
Wow talk about thicker than dog sh it, if Bishop was waving anything of significance around it would have been printed in the NEWS LMD arm of the Liberal party. But even those losers are not touching this crap.
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:32am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:27am:
you mean you were shitting yourself trying to find an out, when Cods kindly handed you one ... the fact that it in no way looks like a question and she was wrong is beside the point, you still grabbed it and ran with it. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by lisa.greek on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:33am cods wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:27am:
Maybe it was another whining old pensioner' s subsidised electricity bill that bishop was trying to table to show the old biddie had suffered a price increase of nearly a 100% due to the carbon pricing scheme. third time lucky? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:35am John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:32am:
Yeh, thats why I never ran. lol 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:36am cods wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:27am:
WHEN WILL YOU COMPHREHEND THAT IF BISHOP HAS EVIDENCE SHE SHOULD SUBMIT IT TO THE POLICE? LYNCH MOBS ARE NOT THE AUTHORITY IN THIS COUNTRY. TOMATOES. HORSES. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:37am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:35am:
no? you just cowered under the desk perhaps? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:37am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:35am:
Ok so then you can provide the documentation. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:37am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:36am:
She is showing respect for the PM to have Gillard clear up the matter before Bishop hands it off to the police. Full circle, well done. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:38am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:37am:
You will need to be more specific. What documentation are you after? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:39am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:37am:
Less dribbling nonsense and speaking on behalf of bishop, more providing documentation you claim you've seen. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:41am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:37am:
At this point I would call you an idiot, but that would be an injustice to the idiots out there .... |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:41am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:38am:
The documentation you've sighted that proves gillards guilt. Try a you want,liar, but your last bit of dignity and credibility has gone. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:41am John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:41am:
I am sure that keeps you happy. :-X :-X :-X :-X |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:42am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:41am:
Now instead of being more specific, you go and expand the documention requirement to which I have never said. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:46am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:42am:
That's not what you said. Question or no question there was an implication documentation exists. You made the question or statement. Provide us the documentation you were talking about. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:48am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:46am:
Like I said, you will need to quote skip and then me in order for me to clear this up for you. Obviously some on here are having a problem with the written english language. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:52am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:48am:
Consider yourself quoted .... Is that what was on the documentation that gillard signed and is available for all to see. now show us the documentation you refer to ... you even claim its availble for all to see, but the only person who's seen it is you ... thats a bit strange isn't it? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:53am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:48am:
yep, the resident forum scramble queen, scrambling thoughts on many different issues all into one paragraph, and you it seems. It's not that hard progressives. You claim you have sited documentation. Provide it for us all to see too. Why be a goose about it? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:54am John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:52am:
What was that quote in relation to? |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:55am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:53am:
I have weird sense of humor |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:57am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:54am:
you should know, you wrote it , I never know what you are on about .... what were you referring to? enlighten us with your superior knowledge ... and show us the documents you say are available for all to see .... |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:58am
.
Quote:
This is what the liar known as progressives lol wrote, where is it?? Provide that documentation that's you have clearly said existed. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:59am
progs is a sad little liar who hasn't the balls to admit he got a little overexcited in his diatribe and has never actually seen the documents that he refers to ..... the smart thing for you to do progs is to leave it at that and finish it ... not that i give you credit for any smarts ....
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:00am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:55am:
Not weird, just none. But enough abotu you - why not now go get the documentation you were referring to? Perhaps Michael can help you out? He is a man of... inte...grity ;D |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:01am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:00am:
I said I cant clear it up for you until I see skippy quoted and then me. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:02am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:01am:
We're not putting conditions on it. You said what you said. If you had any integrity left you'd stop beating around the bush and provide the documentation. Or admit you're an idiot. Either of the two are fine. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:03am
Progressives lol wrote.
Quote:
Bump |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:06am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:02am:
What a shame. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:09am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:06am:
ok so by your own admission, you're an idiot. Got it. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:09am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:06am:
why? don't feel bad, it's not a shame .. the world needs idiots like you ... helps keep people like Alan Jones and Pickering employed ..... |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:10am John Smith wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:09am:
To be one quote away... what a shame. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by John Smith on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:12am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:10am:
you've been given your quote many times ... you choosing to pretend you don't know what people are referring to is a reflection on you , not on others ... |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:13am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:10am:
yep and I'm accepting that as your admission of being an idiot. Glad you agree you're an idiot. Next time try to avoid lying when you spread crap. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:14am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:13am:
Well you would have to im sure. Such a shame. :'( :-* To think, one quote away from you kicking your own Azzzzzz |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:18am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:14am:
;D Would you mind changing your screenname to - progressiveslol-idiot? Please? Given you've admitted you are an idiot who can't back up your own claims, I think it would serve this forum's interest for others to know how much of an idiot you are. I'm sure most know anyway when most of your stuff comes from Pickering and Michael Smith, but none the less, I think a label is warranted in this situation. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:21am
progressiveslol, kindly buy this shirt for yourself.
Given you've admitted to being an idiot. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by woof woof on Nov 4th, 2012 at 2:20pm
.
What about this copied from pickering post JULIA SHOULD HAVE PAID OFF RALPH... he was the only one she didn’t Julia Gillard as a lawyer promoted the bona fides of her client, the AWU, in order to steal from them. Then, when union members started to complain, she shut them down with a writ. Massive fraud was committed on her own company’s client, the AWU, and her own company, Slater & Gordon, tried to hide the fraud from its own client. They were successful for almost a year. Bruce Wilson and Julia Gillard were as thick as thieves yet Bonnie now says Clyde’s activities were unbeknown to her. Yeah, right. Clyde could not have operated without Bonnie’s full cooperation. She was legally integral to the entire ongoing operation. No crime would or could have been committed without her. Of course Bonnie partook of the proceeds of crime. Even she says, “I can’t rule that out”. Bonnie is now our Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, and her supporters in the media have told us to, “move on folks, there’s nothing to see here”. The full story is spelt out in all its glory in the “The Gillard Files” on Pickering Post. It has been sitting there for some months. The ALP and the media knew it was there and purposely ignored it. Gillard, as Prime Minister, set about paying off those who could incriminate her: Bernard Murphy, senior equity partner in Slater & Gordon (who hurriedly departed S & G at the same time as Gillard was sacked) was promoted, leapfrogging the magistracy, to a Judge on the Bench of the Federal Court. Incredibly, he is still there. A crook sitting in judgment on crooks! Golly! Nicola Roxon who assisted in secreting Gillard’s personal files at Maurice Blackburn was promoted, unqualified, to Attorney General. All the files have now disappeared. Her ineptness as A.G. has been demonstrated by the Ashby affair. Roxon’s live-in partner AWU National Secretary, Bill Shorten, who was privy to the extensive fraud and responsible for burying it, was given a Ministry. AWU Supremo ‘Big’ Bill Ludwig’s son, Joe, was given a Ministry in the Senate. Bill Ludwig organised the numbers for Gillard months before she knifed Kevin Rudd. Joe’s costly ineptness has been demonstrated by his “live cattle” and “super trawler” disasters. Another dangerous AWU Joint National Secretary, Ian Cambridge, who had produced a damning Affidavit on Gillard’s activities, was promoted to Gillard’s Fair Work Australia. He now claims he cannot comment. And then there was the honest ex-AWU boss, Bob Kernohan. The best way to shut him up was to get the union heavies to bash him. They did, but couldn’t silence him, and he is still in hiding. Mark Abib, Stephen Conroy and others who were “in the know” and had assisted with Gillard’s numbers, were rewarded with Ministries. All demonstrated their incompetence. Mark Abib was later to see the writing on the wall and resign from Parliament in a flurry of yet more union fraud allegations. This left a vacant Senate seat for Gillard to gift to Bob Carr, unelected. Carr has also demonstrated the same ineptness as he did in State Parliament. Then there was the pro-Rudd Attorney General, Rob McClelland. He was sacked to make way for Roxon. But McClelland wasn’t likely to bring the Government down. He is a true Labor man and is safe, well, maybe. So, who was left for Gillard to pay off? Bruce Wilson? No, Wilson would need to incriminate himself if he was to expose Gillard. Without a plea-bargain deal, Wilson is also safe. Peter Slipper is an ex-Liberal loose cannon and could wreck her Prime Ministership. But Gillard has just appointed him to the prestigious Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee, replacing Rob McClelland. Now Pete can continue with his outrageous overseas junkets and cop cash committee fees of $30,000 a time. Slipper dutifully obliged Gillard, went straight to his cross bench and gave Tony Abbott a blistering serve. Yep, Gillard has it all wrapped up in a compact little bundle topped with a red bow, except for... except for good ol’ Ralph. Perhaps Gillard should have given him his lousy $13,430 he asked for rather than telling him to “fornicate off!” It’s always the little things that erode the clay feet of tyrants. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 2:25pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:21am:
I dont think I will wear your second hand shirt with your man boobs shaping my chest. ;D ;D ;D What a shame |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 4:31pm
Still no documents, proglieshisassoff?
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 7:17pm
Eric Abetz. What document exactly do these fools want. Gillard needs to answer to the parliament.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajS8aQnkH1Y |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 4th, 2012 at 7:21pm skippy. wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 4:31pm:
Bump |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by Maqqa on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:59pm
Labor won't allow the documents to be tabled in parliament so why should prog give you the documents
|
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:02pm Maqqa wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:59pm:
Well that is true. Now if we can only figure out which documents they are referring to exactly. Maybe we can petition labor to allow all the gillard awu documents. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by rabbitoh07 on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:11pm progressiveslol wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:02pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:29am:
What is the documentation that gillard signed and is available for all to see?!?!? Please tell us, or apologise for telling lies. Show us the documentation that "gillard signed and is available for all to see" I smell pants on fire. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:16pm rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 10:11pm:
lol that pants on fire is sooo you. You are too late and too far out of it. I have offered to answer but with a request for 2 quotes. I didnt get it, so you dont get the answer. I am done with the game of the day. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by skippy. on Nov 5th, 2012 at 7:48am Maqqa wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 9:59pm:
If they existed they would be in the press. Wow rightards are dumb. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by cods on Nov 5th, 2012 at 7:53am skippy. wrote on Nov 5th, 2012 at 7:48am:
Bishop was waving the document around in parliament but they blocked tabling it.. so no it isnt free for the press to publish.. why wouldnt she allow it to be tabled????????? it just had her signature on it..whats so BAD about that?i I wonder. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 5th, 2012 at 7:54am cods wrote on Nov 5th, 2012 at 7:53am:
Why won't Bishop hand it over to the police????????????????????????????????? TOMATOES HORSES |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by cods on Nov 5th, 2012 at 8:01am sir prince duke alevine wrote on Nov 5th, 2012 at 7:54am:
well I dont usually bother with the likes of you... you are so obnoxious.. however what would the police do with it???? dumb dumb.. do you think anyone can walk into a police station with a piece of paper and say Investigate this for me....gawd!!!!!!!!!!!!! n o one has asked them to investigate it is up to the AWU to ask that. and I think you will find gillard is as thick as ...well thieves with the AWU.. Howes made a huge song and dance about getting members money back...and then silence.....not word has he said about this since.. dumb dumb. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 5th, 2012 at 8:16am cods wrote on Nov 5th, 2012 at 8:01am:
Are you FOR REAL!?!?!?! TOMATOES HORSES!!! 1. Police are there to maintain the law and to investigate. It is their job. Especially if Julie Bishop decides to get in touch with them and advise them she has this evidence. 2. JULIE BISHOP IS NOT THE POLICE. TOMATOES HORSES!!!! SHE SHOULD NOT BE STARTING A WITCH HUNT. 3. There actually is an ongoing fraud investigation into the scandal. SO JULIE CAN GIVE THEM THE DOCUMENTATION. TOMATOES HORSES! |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by progressiveslol on Nov 5th, 2012 at 8:20am cods wrote on Nov 5th, 2012 at 8:01am:
The AWU will have to want their money back and fully co-operate. Not having a decent AWU leadership, the liberals have done the next best thing. Get gillard to answer the parliament. Oops, she did and now she will need to explain further as she seems to have mislead parliament. Tactics are the only way to get this poison fixed. |
|
Title: Re: Why won't progressiveslol provide documentation? Post by alevine on Nov 5th, 2012 at 8:21am progressiveslol wrote on Nov 5th, 2012 at 8:20am:
Are you still trying to creep out of your hole? Documentation, and then you can come out and play again. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |
