I started a thread earlier asking for an explanation for being banned .. It is the second time in two weeks and I've no idea why. I think it is only fair that a reason be given so that I may modify my behaviour. Rather than give me a reason, the mods have locked the thread so nobody can post on it. Are they afraid of criticism? Surely it would be a simple to just tell me why I was banned?

I have read peoples claims that it has nothing to do with political persuasion, but I find that hard to believe given the decision to lock the thread rather than give a reason ..... with power comes responsibility ... why don't the mods act responsibly instead of trying to restrict free speech

I would still like an explanation for being banned from whoever the coward that did it is  ........

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 8:56pm:

I started a thread earlier asking for an explanation for being banned .. It is the second time in two weeks and I've no idea why. I think it is only fair that a reason be given so that I may modify my behaviour. Rather than give me a reason, the mods have locked the thread so nobody can post on it. Are they afraid of criticism? Surely it would be a simple to just tell me why I was banned? I have read peoples claims that it has nothing to do with political persuasion, but I find that hard to believe given the decision to lock the thread rather than give a reason ..... with power comes responsibility ... why don't the mods act responsibly instead of trying to restrict free speech

But are you a person who believes in, and who respects, reason and reasonableness ???

Or is 'reason' only 'entertained' by you [when debating with others], within, and only on, your own terms ?

FD says it best here
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468

John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them.

With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post.

I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts.

Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided.

Yadda wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 8:56pm: I started a thread earlier asking for an explanation for being banned .. It is the second time in two weeks and I've no idea why. I think it is only fair that a reason be given so that I may modify my behaviour. Rather than give me a reason, the mods have locked the thread so nobody can post on it. Are they afraid of criticism? Surely it would be a simple to just tell me why I was banned? I have read peoples claims that it has nothing to do with political persuasion, but I find that hard to believe given the decision to lock the thread rather than give a reason ..... with power comes responsibility ... why don't the mods act responsibly instead of trying to restrict free speech But are you a person who believes in, and who respects, reason and reasonableness ??? Or is 'reason' only 'entertained' by you [when debating with others], within, and only on, your own terms ?

what are you on about? If you've nothing constructive to  say might I suggest that you go and annoy your dog ...

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:21pm:

FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided.

I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ...

telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too?

I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people.

As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult?

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:45pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult?

It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect.

The profanity, the directness of it counts.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:50pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts.

not according to his rules ....

You can't handle the truth.

freediver wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:53pm:

You can't handle the truth.

what truth?

freediver wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:53pm:

You can't handle the truth.

now that you're here would you care to enlighten me as to why I was banned on Friday?

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:51pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules ....

It is not in his rules to follow every thread, every post either. Most people are not too worried about being called stupid, but I guess if you notified a mod that you think it is against the rules and that you are offended, then I guess something might happen. Thats assuming it is against the rules.

On the other hand, if there is profanity and directness, then people are more likely to report it. So it is more against the rules of the people and gets them reporting.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:55pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... It is not in his rules to follow every thread, every post either. Most people are not too worried about being called stupid, but I guess if you notified a mod that you think it is against the rules and that you are offended, then I guess something might happen. Thats assuming it is against the rules. On the other hand, if there is profanity and directness, then people are more likely to report it. So it is more against the rules of the people and gets them reporting.

why are you commenting on something you have no idea about ? Unless you know why I was banned?

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:57pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:55pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... It is not in his rules to follow every thread, every post either. Most people are not too worried about being called stupid, but I guess if you notified a mod that you think it is against the rules and that you are offended, then I guess something might happen. Thats assuming it is against the rules. On the other hand, if there is profanity and directness, then people are more likely to report it. So it is more against the rules of the people and gets them reporting. why are you commenting on something you have no idea about ? Unless you know why I was banned?

I am surprised you dont know. I have been around long enough to know the profanity and directness of some of your posts. Like I said, I cop it from you. Have I reported you for it. Dam straight.

Did I get you banned. No you did.

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:51pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules ....

John, stick to your guns mate. I've been banned 3 times since I've been here (not long only seems like yesterday) but I believe that my bannings were simply because I pissed off these fascist right wing prick underlings. they can hurl it, but give a little back and they run to the 'button'. FD is to busy most of the time either killing poor innocent fish or dreaming about it.
I wouldn't expect too much sense from these mentally challenged clowns.
I plan to post often over the coming days, so if I am absent it will be my 4th ban. on the bright side it sure gives me street cred.

I've added a poll to see if anyone else thinks they should be told why they are banned

magpie wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... John, stick to your guns mate. I've been banned 3 times since I've been here (not long only seems like yesterday) but I believe that my bannings were simply because I pissed off these fascist right wing prick underlings. they can hurl it, but give a little back and they run to the 'button'. FD is to busy most of the time either killing poor innocent fish or dreaming about it. I wouldn't expect too much sense from these mentally challenged clowns. I plan to post often over the coming days, so if I am absent it will be my 4th ban. on the bright side it sure gives me street cred.

nothing wrong with killing fish  ... much worse ways to pass the time ...

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:59pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:57pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:55pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... It is not in his rules to follow every thread, every post either. Most people are not too worried about being called stupid, but I guess if you notified a mod that you think it is against the rules and that you are offended, then I guess something might happen. Thats assuming it is against the rules. On the other hand, if there is profanity and directness, then people are more likely to report it. So it is more against the rules of the people and gets them reporting. why are you commenting on something you have no idea about ? Unless you know why I was banned? I am surprised you dont know. I have been around long enough to know the profanity and directness of some of your posts. Like I said, I cop it from you. Have I reported you for it. Dam straight. Did I get you banned. No you did.

I bet you run and report every time someone says something you don't like ....  your that type of person ...

magpie wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... John, stick to your guns mate. I've been banned 3 times since I've been here (not long only seems like yesterday) but I believe that my bannings were simply because I pissed off these fascist right wing prick underlings. they can hurl it, but give a little back and they run to the 'button'. FD is to busy most of the time either killing poor innocent fish or dreaming about it. I wouldn't expect too much sense from these mentally challenged clowns. I plan to post often over the coming days, so if I am absent it will be my 4th ban. on the bright side it sure gives me street cred.

Yeh see I dont know.... street cred... nah my friends would think I was a dik if I showed them how much of a hero I thought I was in an online forum. Street cred would go to zero fast, but thats just me. Just sayin.

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:04pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:59pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:57pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:55pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... It is not in his rules to follow every thread, every post either. Most people are not too worried about being called stupid, but I guess if you notified a mod that you think it is against the rules and that you are offended, then I guess something might happen. Thats assuming it is against the rules. On the other hand, if there is profanity and directness, then people are more likely to report it. So it is more against the rules of the people and gets them reporting. why are you commenting on something you have no idea about ? Unless you know why I was banned? I am surprised you dont know. I have been around long enough to know the profanity and directness of some of your posts. Like I said, I cop it from you. Have I reported you for it. Dam straight. Did I get you banned. No you did. I bet you run and report every time someone says something you don't like ....  your that type of person ...

Lately yes. But it takes a certain kind of profanity and directness to get me to bother.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:04pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:59pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:57pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:55pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... It is not in his rules to follow every thread, every post either. Most people are not too worried about being called stupid, but I guess if you notified a mod that you think it is against the rules and that you are offended, then I guess something might happen. Thats assuming it is against the rules. On the other hand, if there is profanity and directness, then people are more likely to report it. So it is more against the rules of the people and gets them reporting. why are you commenting on something you have no idea about ? Unless you know why I was banned? I am surprised you dont know. I have been around long enough to know the profanity and directness of some of your posts. Like I said, I cop it from you. Have I reported you for it. Dam straight. Did I get you banned. No you did. I bet you run and report every time someone says something you don't like ....  your that type of person ... Lately yes. But it takes a certain kind of profanity and directness to get me to bother.

how old are you? still run to mummy? grow a pair ......

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:54pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:53pm: You can't handle the truth. now that you're here would you care to enlighten me as to why I was banned on Friday?

bump

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:09pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:07pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:04pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:59pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:57pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:55pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... It is not in his rules to follow every thread, every post either. Most people are not too worried about being called stupid, but I guess if you notified a mod that you think it is against the rules and that you are offended, then I guess something might happen. Thats assuming it is against the rules. On the other hand, if there is profanity and directness, then people are more likely to report it. So it is more against the rules of the people and gets them reporting. why are you commenting on something you have no idea about ? Unless you know why I was banned? I am surprised you dont know. I have been around long enough to know the profanity and directness of some of your posts. Like I said, I cop it from you. Have I reported you for it. Dam straight. Did I get you banned. No you did. I bet you run and report every time someone says something you don't like ....  your that type of person ... Lately yes. But it takes a certain kind of profanity and directness to get me to bother. how old are you? still run to mummy? grow a pair ......

Grow a pair of what. Are you suggesting I join in on your bannable offensiveness. Nah. Like I said, it takes me a bit to be bothered and that makes it all the more reason to wonder how the hell could you not know why you get banned. It isnt like you go around being nice every day. You come up with some pretty poor form on a daily basis.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:12pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:09pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:07pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:04pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:59pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:57pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:55pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... It is not in his rules to follow every thread, every post either. Most people are not too worried about being called stupid, but I guess if you notified a mod that you think it is against the rules and that you are offended, then I guess something might happen. Thats assuming it is against the rules. On the other hand, if there is profanity and directness, then people are more likely to report it. So it is more against the rules of the people and gets them reporting. why are you commenting on something you have no idea about ? Unless you know why I was banned? I am surprised you dont know. I have been around long enough to know the profanity and directness of some of your posts. Like I said, I cop it from you. Have I reported you for it. Dam straight. Did I get you banned. No you did. I bet you run and report every time someone says something you don't like ....  your that type of person ... Lately yes. But it takes a certain kind of profanity and directness to get me to bother. how old are you? still run to mummy? grow a pair ...... Grow a pair of what. Are you suggesting I join in on your bannable offensiveness. Nah. Like I said, it takes me a bit to be bothered and that makes it all the more reason to wonder how the hell could you not know why you get banned. It isnt like you go around being nice every day. You come up with some pretty poor form on a daily basis.

grow a pair of balls you Eunuch ....

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:03pm:

magpie wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:01pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... John, stick to your guns mate. I've been banned 3 times since I've been here (not long only seems like yesterday) but I believe that my bannings were simply because I pissed off these fascist right wing prick underlings. they can hurl it, but give a little back and they run to the 'button'. FD is to busy most of the time either killing poor innocent fish or dreaming about it. I wouldn't expect too much sense from these mentally challenged clowns. I plan to post often over the coming days, so if I am absent it will be my 4th ban. on the bright side it sure gives me street cred. nothing wrong with killing fish  ... much worse ways to pass the time ...

it starts with fish.. then you graduate to banning..

magpie wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:03pm: magpie wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:01pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... John, stick to your guns mate. I've been banned 3 times since I've been here (not long only seems like yesterday) but I believe that my bannings were simply because I pissed off these fascist right wing prick underlings. they can hurl it, but give a little back and they run to the 'button'. FD is to busy most of the time either killing poor innocent fish or dreaming about it. I wouldn't expect too much sense from these mentally challenged clowns. I plan to post often over the coming days, so if I am absent it will be my 4th ban. on the bright side it sure gives me street cred. nothing wrong with killing fish  ... much worse ways to pass the time ... it starts with fish.. then you graduate to banning..

I like my fishing, but with young kids I don't get to go out much anymore ... Just biding my time until they are old enough to cast a line .... 

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:06pm:

magpie wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:01pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... John, stick to your guns mate. I've been banned 3 times since I've been here (not long only seems like yesterday) but I believe that my bannings were simply because I pissed off these fascist right wing prick underlings. they can hurl it, but give a little back and they run to the 'button'. FD is to busy most of the time either killing poor innocent fish or dreaming about it. I wouldn't expect too much sense from these mentally challenged clowns. I plan to post often over the coming days, so if I am absent it will be my 4th ban. on the bright side it sure gives me street cred. Yeh see I dont know.... street cred... nah my friends would think I was a dik if I showed them how much of a hero I thought I was in an online forum. Street cred would go to zero fast, but thats just me. Just sayin.

you called me a dik! you negatively impacted on my self image with the hero thing. ban yourself or I shall call you names too, or worse call my mummy..

magpie wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:22pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:06pm: magpie wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:01pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... John, stick to your guns mate. I've been banned 3 times since I've been here (not long only seems like yesterday) but I believe that my bannings were simply because I pissed off these fascist right wing prick underlings. they can hurl it, but give a little back and they run to the 'button'. FD is to busy most of the time either killing poor innocent fish or dreaming about it. I wouldn't expect too much sense from these mentally challenged clowns. I plan to post often over the coming days, so if I am absent it will be my 4th ban. on the bright side it sure gives me street cred. Yeh see I dont know.... street cred... nah my friends would think I was a dik if I showed them how much of a hero I thought I was in an online forum. Street cred would go to zero fast, but thats just me. Just sayin. you called me a dik! you negatively impacted on my self image with the hero thing. ban yourself or I shall call you names too, or worse call my mummy..

I cant help it you have comprehension issues. You are on your own.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:24pm:

magpie wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:22pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:06pm: magpie wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:01pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:51pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:50pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:45pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:21pm: FD says it best here http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1225802468 John, you really do need to realise what the rules state. There has been many times you have made direct profane insults to other people, me being one of them. With that said, it looks like the advise from FD to go over your recent posts, is the explanation you require. Just not an explanation directly to the offensive post. I dont think you need any further correspondence from FD if you would look at the rules and your recent posts. Coming here requesting this information is also in violation of the rules if I am not mistaken, going by the link provided. I haven't had any correspondence from FD, and to be fair, I'm not even sure it was he who banned me ... telling me to go back over my posts is a cop out ... and trying to make it a rule that one can't even ask why? bugger me, where are we? Nazi Germany? Do I have to hail Hitler when I log on too? I don't think its unreasonable for him to give reasons for banning people. As for my posts to you, you and many others on here insult others too, if he banned people for that just about everyone would be banned ... I've even seen him refer to spot as stupid .. why is that not an insult? It would be the difference between saying 'you are stupid' compared to 'you are the biggest f n stupid idiot' ect. The profanity, the directness of it counts. not according to his rules .... John, stick to your guns mate. I've been banned 3 times since I've been here (not long only seems like yesterday) but I believe that my bannings were simply because I pissed off these fascist right wing prick underlings. they can hurl it, but give a little back and they run to the 'button'. FD is to busy most of the time either killing poor innocent fish or dreaming about it. I wouldn't expect too much sense from these mentally challenged clowns. I plan to post often over the coming days, so if I am absent it will be my 4th ban. on the bright side it sure gives me street cred. Yeh see I dont know.... street cred... nah my friends would think I was a dik if I showed them how much of a hero I thought I was in an online forum. Street cred would go to zero fast, but thats just me. Just sayin. you called me a dik! you negatively impacted on my self image with the hero thing. ban yourself or I shall call you names too, or worse call my mummy.. I cant help it you have comprehension issues. You are on your own.

noo, you 'just can't help it ....' end of story

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 9:54pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:53pm: You can't handle the truth. now that you're here would you care to enlighten me as to why I was banned on Friday?

Well on the bright side i worked out why i was banned. I left off the quote marks when i quoted soren.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 5:00am:

Well on the bright side i worked out why i was banned. I left off the quote marks when i quoted soren. SOB

As well as logic, comprehensible language, and a cohesive argument.

I can't believe 7 people voted NO .... what a bunch of Lemmings?

John Smith wrote on Oct 31^st, 2012 at 10:36pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:54pm: freediver wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:53pm: You can't handle the truth. would you care to enlighten me as to why I was banned on Friday?

Well, personally, I'd like to know why, were I to be 'sin-binned'.

How can you avoid a repeat if you don't know what you've done wrong?

When modding, I ALWAYS warn by PM first, then if I 'sin-bin' them, they
are in no doubt as to why....

Kat wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 8:17am:

Well, personally, I'd like to know why, were I to be 'sin-binned'. How can you avoid a repeat if you don't know what you've done wrong? When modding, I ALWAYS warn by PM first, then if I 'sin-bin' them, they are in no doubt as to why....

I used to mod an immigration forum many years ago ... same thing, we gave warning and then if they were banned they were made aware of the reasons why ... its such a cop out to say 'go back over your threads' ....... it leaves the system open to abuse .

Seriously this is pathetic.

Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal?

Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off.

This forum is deteriorating, it used to be that you got a warning before getting banned, that's what the rules stated anyway. You used to have to break one or more of the rules or the terms of service to be banned, now you just get banned because...............................someone doesn't like you.

For a political forum it wreaks of undemocratic behaviour.

What a pack of sooks, Ive been banned a few times and I dont really care.

Take a look at the two main whingers here - Spot/Magpie with 48 posts daily, and John with his 24.

Do you really have that much to contribute, I dont think so.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 9:03am:

This forum is deteriorating, it used to be that you got a warning before getting banned, that's what the rules stated anyway. You used to have to break one or more of the rules or the terms of service to be banned, now you just get banned because...............................someone doesn't like you. For a political forum it wreaks of undemocratic behaviour.

It's not deteriorating at all. It's because you have a morbid and pessimistic outlook on life that makes you see 'deterioration' everywhere.
The forum's the same as it's always been since I've been here (with the exception of one poster).

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 8:45am:

Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off.

I find Andrei offensive and await his banning ...you have the option of fking off and skipping this thread.

Verge wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 9:21am:

What a pack of sooks, Ive been banned a few times and I dont really care. Take a look at the two main whingers here - Spot/Magpie with 48 posts daily, and John with his 24. Do you really have that much to contribute, I dont think so.

well whoop de doo for you, like you ever contribute anything worthwhile ... try getting a life instead of counting everyones posts ....

John Smith wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 9:41am:

Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:21am: What a pack of sooks, Ive been banned a few times and I dont really care. Take a look at the two main whingers here - Spot/Magpie with 48 posts daily, and John with his 24. Do you really have that much to contribute, I dont think so. well whoop de doo for you, like you ever contribute anything worthwhile ... try getting a life instead of counting everyones posts ....

You want a wham burger with your french cries?

The mods owe you nothing.  Get over it and move on.

Quantum wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 8:12am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 5:00am: Well on the bright side i worked out why i was banned. I left off the quote marks when i quoted soren. SOB As well as logic, comprehensible language, and a cohesive argument.

There wasnt any of that there to quote

SOB

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 8:45am:

Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off.

So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why?

SOB

My my.  Looks like John Smith is quite the lachrymist.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:13am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB

Chances are because he said something against the rules. He goes back through his post and what do you know. He said a word against the rules.

He comes back all the more wiser.

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:18am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:13am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB Chances are because he said something against the rules. He goes back through his post and what do you know. He said a word against the rules. He comes back all the more wiser.

There apparently arent any words against the rules. If there are could you please link me to the list.

SOB

God damn spot/magpie you are a whinger.

Just suck it up and move on.  Maybe if you didnt troll and post so much non factual and non sensical bullcrap they wouldnt find the need to ban you.

How do you find the time to post with two accounts in the volume that you do?

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:18am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:13am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB Chances are because he said something against the rules. He goes back through his post and what do you know. He said a word against the rules. He comes back all the more wiser. There apparently arent any words against the rules. If there are could you please link me to the list. SOB

pinned threads in this section of the forum. Read them.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:13am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB

I really wouldn't get hung up on it.
Forums don't play a very big part of my life.

Seriously, if this is a concern for you then you need a bit more of a life.

How childish.

Verge wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:49am:

God damn spot/magpie you are a whinger. Just suck it up and move on.  Maybe if you didnt troll and post so much non factual and non sensical bullcrap they wouldnt find the need to ban you. How do you find the time to post with two accounts in the volume that you do?

Why are you being such a troll?

SOB

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:51am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:47am: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:18am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:13am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB Chances are because he said something against the rules. He goes back through his post and what do you know. He said a word against the rules. He comes back all the more wiser. There apparently arent any words against the rules. If there are could you please link me to the list. SOB pinned threads in this section of the forum. Read them.

So you cant answer. I knew that because i have read the rules page. Too bad you cant admit it though.

SOB

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:53am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:13am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB I really wouldn't get hung up on it. Forums don't play a very big part of my life. Seriously, if this is a concern for you then you need a bit more of a life. How childish.

Aww you poor thing - you tried to pick a fight and it didnt work. Why the heck are you and verge going on @ me anyway? Its johns thread.

SOB

John Smith wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 9:41am:

Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:21am: What a pack of sooks, Ive been banned a few times and I dont really care. Take a look at the two main whingers here - Spot/Magpie with 48 posts daily, and John with his 24. Do you really have that much to contribute, I dont think so. well whoop de doo for you, like you ever contribute anything worthwhile ... try getting a life instead of counting everyones posts ....

It's not exactly hard to see, you don't need to count. It's written there.

Spot posts 1,500 per month.
This fact combined with how big a deal it is to him if he is unable to post - suggests he has very little life outside the internet.

The fact he is in his 50s and lives with a flatmate and likes Star Trek aside...
;)

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:56am:

Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:49am: God damn spot/magpie you are a whinger. Just suck it up and move on.  Maybe if you didnt troll and post so much non factual and non sensical bullcrap they wouldnt find the need to ban you. How do you find the time to post with two accounts in the volume that you do? Why are you being such a troll? SOB

Im not the one with two accounts and more than 50 posts a day princess.

If spot or john or magpie what ever, bothered to read

Suspensions
If you break the rules, you will be suspended. Warnings are rarely given. If it is your first offence, it will probably be for approximately 1 day. Do not send and email asking why you were suspended. Do not create additional profiles to circumvent suspension. Wait until your suspension is removed, then view your recent posts. It should be obvious why you were susended. In 95% of cases it is for insulting other members. Please take the opportunity to learn from your mistake. If more than one person uses the same computer to post on OzPolitic, let the admin know as soon as you are suspended, otherwise it may be assumed that you are using multiple profiles. If you believe that your suspension has lasted for longer than it should, contact an administrator by email.

-----
That is the only explanation you deserve, unless you want to own the forum.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:58am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:53am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:13am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB I really wouldn't get hung up on it. Forums don't play a very big part of my life. Seriously, if this is a concern for you then you need a bit more of a life. How childish. Aww you poor thing - you tried to pick a fight and it didnt work. Why the heck are you and verge going on @ me anyway? Its johns thread. SOB

I think you are a bit of a loser and you just seem to annoy everyone.
That's all really. I feel more sorry for you than anything.

No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice. 

Quantum wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 11:55am:

No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.

When you are on the payroll, you dont get paid if you dont get on the forum  ;)

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:58am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:41am: Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:21am: What a pack of sooks, Ive been banned a few times and I dont really care. Take a look at the two main whingers here - Spot/Magpie with 48 posts daily, and John with his 24. Do you really have that much to contribute, I dont think so. well whoop de doo for you, like you ever contribute anything worthwhile ... try getting a life instead of counting everyones posts .... It's not exactly hard to see, you don't need to count. It's written there. Spot posts 1,500 per month. This fact combined with how big a deal it is to him if he is unable to post - suggests he has very little life outside the internet. The fact he is in his 50s and lives with a flatmate and likes Star Trek aside... ;)

Why are you trying to make this thread about me? I told you im not interested. Go find someone else for your lust.

SOB

Verge wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:58am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:56am: Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:49am: God damn spot/magpie you are a whinger. Just suck it up and move on.  Maybe if you didnt troll and post so much non factual and non sensical bullcrap they wouldnt find the need to ban you. How do you find the time to post with two accounts in the volume that you do? Why are you being such a troll? SOB Im not the one with two accounts and more than 50 posts a day princess.

You reckon i am magpie - prove it.

SOB

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 11:00am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:58am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:53am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:13am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB I really wouldn't get hung up on it. Forums don't play a very big part of my life. Seriously, if this is a concern for you then you need a bit more of a life. How childish. Aww you poor thing - you tried to pick a fight and it didnt work. Why the heck are you and verge going on @ me anyway? Its johns thread. SOB I think you are a bit of a loser and you just seem to annoy everyone. That's all really. I feel more sorry for you than anything.

you seriously need to get a life. You are on here all night every night. No social life @ all? No wonder you are obsessed with me but i told you im not interested. Stop asking.

SOB

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 12:00pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 11:55am: No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.  When you are on the payroll, you dont get paid if you dont get on the forum  ;)

you would know

SOB

Quantum wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 11:55am:

No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.

Well i dont know if john works or not and i dont care. Why do you care?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 12:38pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 12:00pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 11:55am: No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.  When you are on the payroll, you dont get paid if you dont get on the forum  ;) you would know SOB

Yeh because im here complaining about getting banned lol  ::)

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 12:39pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 11:55am: No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.  Well i dont know if john works or not and i dont care. Why do you care? SOB

I also had you in mind. The fact that you just did more post in 4 minutes on this thread than I do in a day only backs up that idea.

Quantum wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 1:29pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 12:39pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 11:55am: No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.  Well i dont know if john works or not and i dont care. Why do you care? SOB I also had you in mind. The fact that you just did more post in 4 minutes on this thread than I do in a day only backs up that idea.

Really scraping the barrel bottom now arent you. Lunchtime.

Do you have anything to say on topic? I havent seen you refer to the topic @ all in this thread. The topic (since you prolly didnt even look) is john wants to know why he was banned and thinks its only fair that when someone is banned they should be told why so they can refrain from doing whatever it was again.

Oh and BTW why are you here during the day?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 1:55pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 1:29pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 12:39pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 11:55am: No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.  Well i dont know if john works or not and i dont care. Why do you care? SOB I also had you in mind. The fact that you just did more post in 4 minutes on this thread than I do in a day only backs up that idea. Really scraping the barrel bottom now arent you. Lunchtime. Do you have anything to say on topic? I havent seen you refer to the topic @ all in this thread. The topic (since you prolly didnt even look) is john wants to know why he was banned and thinks its only fair that when someone is banned they should be told why so they can refrain from doing whatever it was again. Oh and BTW why are you here during the day? SOB

Actually when I looked at the topic this morning it was started by you. It seems to have been merged with John's thread from yesterday.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 12:36pm:

Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:58am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:56am: Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:49am: God damn spot/magpie you are a whinger. Just suck it up and move on.  Maybe if you didnt troll and post so much non factual and non sensical bullcrap they wouldnt find the need to ban you. How do you find the time to post with two accounts in the volume that you do? Why are you being such a troll? SOB Im not the one with two accounts and more than 50 posts a day princess. You reckon i am magpie - prove it. SOB

You reckon i am spot - prove it.

Verge wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:01am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:41am: Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:21am: What a pack of sooks, Ive been banned a few times and I dont really care. Take a look at the two main whingers here - Spot/Magpie with 48 posts daily, and John with his 24. Do you really have that much to contribute, I dont think so. well whoop de doo for you, like you ever contribute anything worthwhile ... try getting a life instead of counting everyones posts .... You want a wham burger with your french cries? The mods owe you nothing.  Get over it and move on.

thats not for you to decide now is it ....  I disagree, they owe everyone on here the truth

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 11:00am:

If spot or john or magpie what ever, bothered to read Suspensions If you break the rules, you will be suspended. Warnings are rarely given. If it is your first offence, it will probably be for approximately 1 day. Do not send and email asking why you were suspended. Do not create additional profiles to circumvent suspension. Wait until your suspension is removed, then view your recent posts. It should be obvious why you were susended. In 95% of cases it is for insulting other members. Please take the opportunity to learn from your mistake. If more than one person uses the same computer to post on OzPolitic, let the admin know as soon as you are suspended, otherwise it may be assumed that you are using multiple profiles. If you believe that your suspension has lasted for longer than it should, contact an administrator by email. ----- That is the only explanation you deserve, unless you want to own the forum.

thats a cop out not a rule ....

... wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:14am:

My my.  Looks like John Smith is quite the lachrymist.

bet your really happy with yourself with that one ... probably still laughing about it and looking for your tweezers so you can jerk off and tell yourself how great you are ...

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:18am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:13am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 8:45am: Seriously this is pathetic. Is there such little going on in your life that being banned from an online forum or why is that big a deal? Who gives a bugger. Move on or bugger off. So if you were banned (and hopefully you will be soon) you wouldn't want to know why? SOB Chances are because he said something against the rules. He goes back through his post and what do you know. He said a word against the rules. He comes back all the more wiser.

thats my point exactly ... i don't want chances .. I want to know  the exact reason why ....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 10:58am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:41am: Verge wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 9:21am: What a pack of sooks, Ive been banned a few times and I dont really care. Take a look at the two main whingers here - Spot/Magpie with 48 posts daily, and John with his 24. Do you really have that much to contribute, I dont think so. well whoop de doo for you, like you ever contribute anything worthwhile ... try getting a life instead of counting everyones posts .... It's not exactly hard to see, you don't need to count. It's written there. Spot posts 1,500 per month. This fact combined with how big a deal it is to him if he is unable to post - suggests he has very little life outside the internet. The fact he is in his 50s and lives with a flatmate and likes Star Trek aside... ;)

actually its a bit more complecated .. you have to look for the date they started and then go to the trouble of doing the sums .... talk about suggestions,only a sad case with no life would care enought to bother with how often others post ....

Quantum wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 11:55am:

No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.

I'm self employed ... I make good money with little effort ...  you sit behind your desk and grind away big boy ...

John Smith wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 8:14am:

John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 10:36pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:54pm: freediver wrote on Oct 31st, 2012 at 9:53pm: You can't handle the truth. would you care to enlighten me as to why I was banned on Friday?

John Smith wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 5:03pm:

Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 11:55am: No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.  I'm self employed ... I make good money with little effort ...  you sit behind your desk and grind away big boy ...

FIXED!  ::) ::)

John Smith wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 5:05pm:

would you care to enlighten me as to why I was banned on Friday?

Don't know why you were banned last Friday. But as for the Friday coming, I could take a guess.

John Smith wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 4:57pm:

... wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 10:14am: My my.  Looks like John Smith is quite the lachrymist. bet your really happy with yourself with that one ... probably still laughing about it and looking for your tweezers so you can jerk off and tell yourself how great you are ...

I hadn't given it a 2nd thought actually. 
Shame we can't say the same about you and your banning. 

Quantum wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 5:15pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 5:05pm: would you care to enlighten me as to why I was banned on Friday? Don't know why you were banned last Friday. But as for the Friday coming, I could take a guess.

hilarious!!!its FDs forum its FDs business they are FDs rules..

if you dont like them try somewhere else..as it is... why isnt this complaint on personal message?

only the mods have the answer after all.

Check your PMs.

Quantum wrote on Nov 1^st, 2012 at 2:15pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 1:55pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 1:29pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 12:39pm: Quantum wrote on Nov 1st, 2012 at 11:55am: No one with a Job or real world responsibilities would care about an internet Forum. If I got banned for a day I probably wouldn't even notice.  Well i dont know if john works or not and i dont care. Why do you care? SOB I also had you in mind. The fact that you just did more post in 4 minutes on this thread than I do in a day only backs up that idea. Really scraping the barrel bottom now arent you. Lunchtime. Do you have anything to say on topic? I havent seen you refer to the topic @ all in this thread. The topic (since you prolly didnt even look) is john wants to know why he was banned and thinks its only fair that when someone is banned they should be told why so they can refrain from doing whatever it was again. Oh and BTW why are you here during the day? SOB Actually when I looked at the topic this morning it was started by you. It seems to have been merged with John's thread from yesterday.

Nope still says john. You should get off the hallucinogens

SOB

I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John.

Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives.

Verge wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 8:06am:

I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives.

if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us.
you've been asking for this:
*asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..*
there, does that feel better?

magpie wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 9:02am:

Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better?

I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two?

Verge wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 11:59am:

magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two?

The same way FD did and he was wrong. Im not telling you though because its none of your business. Some ppl see 1 superficial similarity and assume that everything is the same despite the evidence of their eyes or without looking any further.

Some ppl just jump on bandwagons with no facts @ all not even a superficial similarity. Thats you.

SOB

Verge wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 11:59am:

magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two?

As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person.

Fagpie is spots cousin.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 12:30pm:

Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? The same way FD did and he was wrong. Im not telling you though because its none of your business. Some ppl see 1 superficial similarity and assume that everything is the same despite the evidence of their eyes or without looking any further. Some ppl just jump on bandwagons with no facts @ all not even a superficial similarity. Thats you. SOB

Which one of "you" am I talking to here?

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 12:50pm:

Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person.

You are lying

SOB

Verge wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 1:11pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:30pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? The same way FD did and he was wrong. Im not telling you though because its none of your business. Some ppl see 1 superficial similarity and assume that everything is the same despite the evidence of their eyes or without looking any further. Some ppl just jump on bandwagons with no facts @ all not even a superficial similarity. Thats you. SOB Which one of "you" am I talking to here?

You reckon you are the expert who do you think?

SOB

The king of "you're a sock", and "you're a troll" allegations; is a  trolling sock himself? The master of hypocrite accusations, and the one who constantly calls for others to look at their own behaviour; he does the very thing he blames others for? All confirmed by a moderator! Say it ain't so!

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 1:13pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. You are lying SOB

Says the biggest liar this board has.

You've been sprung mate, so just wear it.

Quantum wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 1:18pm:

The king of "you're a sock", and "you're a troll" allegations; is a  trolling sock himself? The master of hypocrite accusations, and the one who constantly calls for others to look at their own behaviour; he does the very thing he blames others for? All confirmed by a moderator! Say it ain't so!

Where is it confirmed by a moderator? Since our IPs are not the same i want to know which moderator is lying.

SOB

Verge wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 1:25pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 1:13pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. You are lying SOB Says the biggest liar this board has. You've been sprung mate, so just wear it.

When have a lied? Link to it.

SOB

Considering Magpie popped up 22 days ago and seems to make more appearances when you are on a sookie la la holiday, interesting dont you think that the mods know you are one in the same.

Between the two thats 53.83 posts a day.

Wow, Im getting visions of the 40 year old virgin right now.

Verge wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 2:01pm:

Considering Magpie popped up 22 days ago and seems to make more appearances when you are on a sookie la la holiday, interesting dont you think that the mods know you are one in the same. Between the two thats 53.83 posts a day.

Feels like he has been here for months. He really made a mess in a short time. 


Quote:

Wow, Im getting visions of the 40 year old virgin right now.

Does a cat still count?

Verge wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 2:01pm:

Considering Magpie popped up 22 days ago and seems to make more appearances when you are on a sookie la la holiday, interesting dont you think that the mods know you are one in the same. Between the two thats 53.83 posts a day. Wow, Im getting visions of the 40 year old virgin right now.

What the heck are you talking about?

I already told you im not interested. Take your fantasies elsewhere.

SOB

Are you drunk today quantum? You are stuffing up your insults relaly badly. Perhaps you need a lil lay down. After spending all day here you must be tired. Verge also - all day. Here. Always saying how im here but you are. @ least im here @ work but i bet you lot arent.

SOB

Quantum wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 2:36pm:

Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 2:01pm: Considering Magpie popped up 22 days ago and seems to make more appearances when you are on a sookie la la holiday, interesting dont you think that the mods know you are one in the same. Between the two thats 53.83 posts a day. Feels like he has been here for months. He really made a mess in a short time.  Quote: Wow, Im getting visions of the 40 year old virgin right now. Does a cat still count?

I think we need to call the RSPCA.

Well? Where are the links? Can you back up any of your accusations? Any @ all? I doubt it well apologise or admit it.

SOB

By "Are the mods afraid of the truth?" you mean moderators of the forum?

shaitan wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 4:31pm:

By "Are the mods afraid of the truth?" you mean moderators of the forum?

http://news.filefront.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/the_mods_paris.jpg

muso wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 6:03pm:

shaitan wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 4:31pm: By "Are the mods afraid of the truth?" you mean moderators of the forum? http://news.filefront.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/the_mods_paris.jpg

Is the old "Mod Squad" back together?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd85Qim_Z6A

Well? Did any of you mods lie about my ip? Verge is saying you did - or was it andrei? One of the liars say you lied about my IP.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 6:41pm:

Well? Did any of you mods lie about my ip? Verge is saying you did - or was it andrei? One of the liars say you lied about my IP. SOB

SpotofMagpie,
I sorry, who are you?

I remember a "SpotofBorg" & a "Magpie", but I don't recal a "Spotof Magpie"!

It was a "joke" on the ppl that were calling me "magpie".

Are you going to answer the question? I know that if you (or anyone else) did actually say anything of the sort about my IP they were lying because i know that magpies and my ips are not the same seeing as we are in different states.

BTW who tried to block my IP from the forum? hint: its dynamic and you would have to block all of iinet including prolly other board members.

SOB

Why was i banned... :'( :'(

Who lied about my IP... :'( :'(

;D

Losers

;D ;D

FriYAY wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 9:57am:

Why was i banned... :'( :'( Who lied about my IP... :'( :'( ;D Losers ;D ;D

Funnily everywhere I look where you are posting you post the same thing. you dont ever discuss anything on topic you just do that crap. Why are you even here?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 10:23am:

FriYAY wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:57am: Why was i banned... :'( :'( Who lied about my IP... :'( :'( ;D Losers ;D ;D Funnily everywhere I look where you are posting you post the same thing. you dont ever discuss anything on topic you just do that crap. Why are you even here? SOB

She's a hooker in between punters.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 10:23am:

FriYAY wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:57am: Why was i banned... :'( :'( Who lied about my IP... :'( :'( ;D Losers ;D ;D Funnily everywhere I look where you are posting you post the same thing. you dont ever discuss anything on topic you just do that crap. Why are you even here? SOB

What TF are you on about Private?

Perfectly on topic....

People crying about getting banned and what the MOD said about their IP address are, IMHO, losers.

;)

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 10:27am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 10:23am: FriYAY wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:57am: Why was i banned... :'( :'( Who lied about my IP... :'( :'( ;D Losers ;D ;D Funnily everywhere I look where you are posting you post the same thing. you dont ever discuss anything on topic you just do that crap. Why are you even here? SOB She's a hooker in between punters.

Hookers! I'd say that's where your hubby get his rocks off missus. Can't see a vile old crone like you turning anyone on.

;D

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 9:03am:

It was a "joke" on the ppl that were calling me "magpie". Are you going to answer the question? I know that if you (or anyone else) did actually say anything of the sort about my IP they were lying because i know that magpies and my ips are not the same seeing as we are in different states. BTW who tried to block my IP from the forum? hint: its dynamic and you would have to block all of iinet including prolly other board members. SOB

I'm sorry Spotty, I can't help you, as I haven't acted as an Administrator/Moderator, since October 1st, as confirmed by the original post on the following thread.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1349662078/all

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 10:36am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:03am: It was a "joke" on the ppl that were calling me "magpie". Are you going to answer the question? I know that if you (or anyone else) did actually say anything of the sort about my IP they were lying because i know that magpies and my ips are not the same seeing as we are in different states. BTW who tried to block my IP from the forum? hint: its dynamic and you would have to block all of iinet including prolly other board members. SOB I'm sorry Spotty, I can't help you, as I haven't acted as an Administrator/Moderator, since October 1st, as confirmed by the original post on the following thread. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1349662078/all

Yeah i know but it is you they are saying told them my ip was same as magpies. Which of course is a lie. I am surprised you arent defending yourself against the allegations.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 11:00am:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 10:36am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 9:03am: It was a "joke" on the ppl that were calling me "magpie". Are you going to answer the question? I know that if you (or anyone else) did actually say anything of the sort about my IP they were lying because i know that magpies and my ips are not the same seeing as we are in different states. BTW who tried to block my IP from the forum? hint: its dynamic and you would have to block all of iinet including prolly other board members. SOB I'm sorry Spotty, I can't help you, as I haven't acted as an Administrator/Moderator, since October 1st, as confirmed by the original post on the following thread. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1349662078/all Yeah i know but it is you they are saying told them my ip was same as magpies. Which of course is a lie. I am surprised you arent defending yourself against the allegations. SOB

Really?

no one has any need to be afraid

except dark satanic freemasonic types

for they are in deep #$%* to use your vernacular

namaste

-:)

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2^nd, 2012 at 12:50pm:

Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person.

Right here perceptions. Did you tell him that? Because i doubt you did because its a lie and you wouldn't lie.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 12:39pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. Right here perceptions. Did you tell him that? Because i doubt you did because its a lie and you wouldn't lie. SOB

It's like Economics Spot, all you can do is gather the pertinent information and come to your own decisions!

And, remember the old finance adage, "If it looks too good to be true, then it probably isn't"?

Bye, Bye, Spot!

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 1:52pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:39pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. Right here perceptions. Did you tell him that? Because i doubt you did because its a lie and you wouldn't lie. SOB It's like Economics Spot, all you can do is gather the pertinent information and come to your own decisions! And, remember the old finance adage, "If it looks too good to be true, then it probably isn't"? Bye, Bye, Spot!

????????????????

Why wont you answer the question? And what has it got to do with things being too good to be true? And where are you going?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 1:56pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:52pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:39pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. Right here perceptions. Did you tell him that? Because i doubt you did because its a lie and you wouldn't lie. SOB It's like Economics Spot, all you can do is gather the pertinent information and come to your own decisions! And, remember the old finance adage, "If it looks too good to be true, then it probably isn't"? Bye, Bye, Spot! ???????????????? Why wont you answer the question? And what has it got to do with things being too good to be true? SOB

Keep it up Private, you've got 'em on the run.

(loloser)

FriYAY wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 2:06pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:56pm: perceptions_now wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:52pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:39pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. Right here perceptions. Did you tell him that? Because i doubt you did because its a lie and you wouldn't lie. SOB It's like Economics Spot, all you can do is gather the pertinent information and come to your own decisions! And, remember the old finance adage, "If it looks too good to be true, then it probably isn't"? Bye, Bye, Spot! ???????????????? Why wont you answer the question? And what has it got to do with things being too good to be true? SOB Keep it up Private, you've got 'em on the run. (loloser)

Beats me how you manage to stay a member when you never offer anything substantial to any conversation just that crap.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 2:13pm:

FriYAY wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 2:06pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:56pm: perceptions_now wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:52pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:39pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. Right here perceptions. Did you tell him that? Because i doubt you did because its a lie and you wouldn't lie. SOB It's like Economics Spot, all you can do is gather the pertinent information and come to your own decisions! And, remember the old finance adage, "If it looks too good to be true, then it probably isn't"? Bye, Bye, Spot! ???????????????? Why wont you answer the question? And what has it got to do with things being too good to be true? SOB Keep it up Private, you've got 'em on the run. (loloser) Beats me how you manage to stay a member when you never offer anything substantial to any conversation just that crap. SOB

LOL

Your error is thinking this conversation is in any way, shape or form important.

It has to be the most unimportant topic, ever and well worthy of my contempt.

:)

FriYAY wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 2:23pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 2:13pm: FriYAY wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 2:06pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:56pm: perceptions_now wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:52pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:39pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. Right here perceptions. Did you tell him that? Because i doubt you did because its a lie and you wouldn't lie. SOB It's like Economics Spot, all you can do is gather the pertinent information and come to your own decisions! And, remember the old finance adage, "If it looks too good to be true, then it probably isn't"? Bye, Bye, Spot! ???????????????? Why wont you answer the question? And what has it got to do with things being too good to be true? SOB Keep it up Private, you've got 'em on the run. (loloser) Beats me how you manage to stay a member when you never offer anything substantial to any conversation just that crap. SOB LOL Your error is thinking this conversation is in any way, shape or form important. It has to be the most unimportant topic, ever and well worthy of my contempt. :)

Oh the fact that you are right about this particular topic is a fluke though - you are like that in every thread you go to though.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2012 at 2:51pm:

FriYAY wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 2:23pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 2:13pm: FriYAY wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 2:06pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:56pm: perceptions_now wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 1:52pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Nov 3rd, 2012 at 12:39pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 12:50pm: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 11:59am: magpie wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 9:02am: Verge wrote on Nov 2nd, 2012 at 8:06am: I see the cry fest is still going on by spot/magpie and John. Well done gents, I think its official.  You dont have lives. if you had half a brain you would see there is no connection between us. you've been asking for this: *asks troll-verge to bend over.. troll whimpers but obliges.. Shoves a very LARGE dreidel up his arse..* there, does that feel better? I wonder how a mod made the connection between you two? As I was told, it is the fact that they have got the same IP Address, hence why Perceptions made the obvious remark that it is the same person. Right here perceptions. Did you tell him that? Because i doubt you did because its a lie and you wouldn't lie. SOB It's like Economics Spot, all you can do is gather the pertinent information and come to your own decisions! And, remember the old finance adage, "If it looks too good to be true, then it probably isn't"? Bye, Bye, Spot! ???????????????? Why wont you answer the question? And what has it got to do with things being too good to be true? SOB Keep it up Private, you've got 'em on the run. (loloser) Beats me how you manage to stay a member when you never offer anything substantial to any conversation just that crap. SOB LOL Your error is thinking this conversation is in any way, shape or form important. It has to be the most unimportant topic, ever and well worthy of my contempt. :) Oh the fact that you are right about this particular topic is a fluke though - you are like that in every thread you go to though. SOB

FFS, you're even in the fresh eggs thread dribbling this IP rubbish.

::)

;D ;D

Loooooooooooooooser ;D

the id muso,

one of the yabb administrators

" surgically removed " all my posts

for being ontopic then threaten to bann this

writer from these boards,the it_is_the_light id.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1348773561/14#14


" Reply #11 - Oct 1st, 2012 at 3:27pm

muso   Offline
YaBB Administrator
Central Queensland


In my Buddy List!
Gender:
Posts: 9466

  Off-Topic replies have been moved to this Topic.

It_Is_the_light's posts have been surgically removed from this thread and relocated to Fringe. IITL - the next time you post blatantly off-topic material on somebody else's thread, you will be banned. « Last Edit: Oct 1st, 2012 at 5:16pm by muso » 
Disclaimer: The factual information contained herein may be detrimental to your erroneous preconceptions. "



this administrator surgically removed ontopic posts and

threatened an ontopic poster..

i forgive the id muso and the character behind it

namaste

<<this administrator surgically removed ontopic posts and

threatened an ontopic poster..>>
........................................................

You'll come across many obstacles in your struggle to let the truth be known. The "war on truth" is spreading  globally. As more truth gets revealed, the 
harder the truth soldiers will hit. Dark forces detest truth.

The truth always comes out in the end though. We are only now discovering true events from WWII.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 6:20am:

<<this administrator surgically removed ontopic posts and threatened an ontopic poster..>> ........................................................ You'll come across many obstacles in your struggle to let the truth be known. The "war on truth" is spreading  globally. As more truth gets revealed, the  harder the truth soldiers will hit. Dark forces detest truth. The truth always comes out in the end though. We are only now discovering true events from WWII.

Let me guess, all that Marxist claptrap you read is the truth?

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 10:42am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 6:20am: <<this administrator surgically removed ontopic posts and threatened an ontopic poster..>> ........................................................ You'll come across many obstacles in your struggle to let the truth be known. The "war on truth" is spreading  globally. As more truth gets revealed, the  harder the truth soldiers will hit. Dark forces detest truth. The truth always comes out in the end though. We are only now discovering true events from WWII. Let me guess, all that Marxist claptrap you read is the truth?

Of course not.

The truth is in the Murdoch and Fairfax media, and what your government tells you, enjoy it Mr Sheeple.

Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'?

I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHYsUlzR-6E

Sacred Geometry DNA changes 2012 Mollecular Atom Consciousness.mp4

here is some truth

the foundation of all matter is consciousness

in ViBrAtIoN / sound

proven truth cymatics experiment here also

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtiSCBXbHAg

Cymatic experiment

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:14am:

Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'? I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though.

Go and search for the truth yourself, it's out there, if you want it.

I'm sorry but I can't reply to It_Is_the_light.  I have some appropriate words, but I'll just think them instead.

On this occasion, I might just change the subject and share a recipe.

http://www.instructables.com/id/Homemade-Nutter-Butters-Recipe/

Nutter butters. Mmmm delicious.

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 11:14am:

Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'? I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though.

'Sheeple' is used to refer to anyone who does NOT see the hand of secret societies/big brother/freemasons/cia etc when the corner store is out of milk...

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 1:07pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:14am: Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'? I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though. Go and search for the truth yourself, it's out there, if you want it.

They would not recognise truth if they fell over it, could not handle the truth if they found it, and would reject it because they are.. lazy amongst other things.

muso wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 2:00pm:

I'm sorry but I can't reply to It_Is_the_light.  I have some appropriate words, but I'll just think them instead. On this occasion, I might just change the subject and share a recipe. http://www.instructables.com/id/Homemade-Nutter-Butters-Recipe/ Nutter butters. Mmmm delicious.

Yeah i liked graham flour but alas you cant get it in australia

SOB

Hyperion wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:28pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 1:07pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:14am: Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'? I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though. Go and search for the truth yourself, it's out there, if you want it. They would not recognise truth if they fell over it, could not handle the truth if they found it, and would reject it because they are.. lazy amongst other things.

And the 'truth' referred to in this context is opinion, not truth...

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:57pm:

Hyperion wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 3:28pm: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 1:07pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:14am: Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'? I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though. Go and search for the truth yourself, it's out there, if you want it. They would not recognise truth if they fell over it, could not handle the truth if they found it, and would reject it because they are.. lazy amongst other things. And the 'truth' referred to in this context is opinion, not truth...

                You can't handle the truth

shaitan wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:41pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 3:57pm: Hyperion wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 3:28pm: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 1:07pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:14am: Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'? I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though. Go and search for the truth yourself, it's out there, if you want it. They would not recognise truth if they fell over it, could not handle the truth if they found it, and would reject it because they are.. lazy amongst other things. And the 'truth' referred to in this context is opinion, not truth...                 You can't handle the truth

LOL sure I can....
The problem is...you guys don't know what it is...

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 4:43pm:

shaitan wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 4:41pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 3:57pm: Hyperion wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 3:28pm: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 1:07pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:14am: Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'? I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though. Go and search for the truth yourself, it's out there, if you want it. They would not recognise truth if they fell over it, could not handle the truth if they found it, and would reject it because they are.. lazy amongst other things. And the 'truth' referred to in this context is opinion, not truth...                 You can't handle the truth LOL sure I can.... The problem is...you guys don't know what it is...

I know what it isnt.

SOB

Hyperion wrote on Nov 4^th, 2012 at 3:28pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 1:07pm: Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Nov 4th, 2012 at 11:14am: Let me guess again, you hold the truth and most people are just dumb 'sheeple'? I'll bet you never tell us what this 'truth' is, though. Go and search for the truth yourself, it's out there, if you want it. They would not recognise truth if they fell over it, could not handle the truth if they found it, and would reject it because they are.. lazy amongst other things.

Nice sloganeering.
Now, what is this truth I can't handle?