| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1350730755 Message started by progressiveslol on Oct 20th, 2012 at 8:59pm |
|
|
Title: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by progressiveslol on Oct 20th, 2012 at 8:59pm
It appears Craig Thomson is in for some Xmas joy as Victorian and NSW police are now confident they have the evidence to lay criminal charges against him before the end of the year.
Reports suggest police have uncovered ample evidence of corruption, including involving other union officials. Police have extensively interviewed others who have supplied corroborative evidence. In what may be a reference to Kathy Jackson, a police source said, "There are people who, in the end, have done the right thing. They have finally questioned what's really been going on and have come away disillusioned with the explanation from those involved saying that nothing's wrong." Asked if Mr Thomson would be charged, the source said, "That is more likely a possibility than not." Another inside report suggested NSW police were giving certain people of interest a final opportunity to co-operate with police investigations before final charge lists were drawn up. According to FWA's Statement of Claim in the Federal Court, Mr Thomson used hundreds of thousands of dollars of union members’ funds on prostitutes, high living, air fares for his then wife, Christa, Under question was the financing of his 2007 election campaign as the Labor candidate for the marginal NSW seat of Dobell. Thomson's liability, if found guilty could, involve up to one million dollars. Mr Thomson, did not respond to calls today, and has strenuously denied any wrongdoing as has Ms Gillard in respect of the AWU matter. Thomson said he would fight all charges brought against him. "It appears the claim of, 'I've done nothing wrong' is commonplace in union and ALP matters", said one spokesperson. NSW police officers on Thursday interviewed a Satya Champness, the personal assistant of former ALP President and NSW branch boss, Michael Williamson. Ms Champness refused to comment. http://lpickering.net/item/10076 Good to see action finally. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by the wise one on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:05pm progressiveslol wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 8:59pm:
From Pickering web site he is a nut case and anyone that believes anything from him is just as bad |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by progressiveslol on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:08pm John S wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:05pm:
He doesnt need to be believed, just like that labor hack site you continue to use and anyone that believes the content is a moron. Kathy Jackson will be vindicated. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by the wise one on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:47pm
lolly would this be about you
A young biddleonian come home from school and said to his mum "At school today we learnt how to count and all the kids can count to 10 and I can count to 30. Is that because I am smart mum?" His mum said "That you are very smart son. Your dad and myself are very proud of you." The next day he come home from school and said to his mum "At school today we learnt at alphabet and all the kids can say up to M and I can say up to V. is that because I am smart mum?" His mum said "You are very smart son." The third he come home from school and went straight to his dad and said "Dad at school today we played games and sport, we all got muddy & dirty and the girls went into one room to have a shower and we went into another room to have a shower. All the boys have little d!cks about 3 inches long and I have one about 6 inches long is that because I am a biddleonian?" His dad said "No son, that is because all the other kids a 6 and you are 16 you wanker." |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by progressiveslol on Oct 20th, 2012 at 11:04pm John S wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:47pm:
I see you have an obsession with little ones. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by Spot of Borg on Oct 21st, 2012 at 4:46am
Blah blah blah blah - how many times have we "finally" had the "truth"?
I expect theres a ways to go and lots more "revelations" to come yet. SOB |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by cods on Oct 21st, 2012 at 6:01am progressiveslol wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 8:59pm:
couldnt agree more... nice to see the" kill the messenger" mob are still active.. I would think Kathy J will have to face up to something...we /they are dealing with embezzlement after all.. and like those people whos money it was.. I too would like my MONEY BACK... conscience dont these people have a conscience.?.. I worry about that too! |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by cods on Oct 21st, 2012 at 6:07am Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 4:46am:
its taken sooooo long.. I read where there were more than one or two brothels involved...and many visits..many with cash...withdrawn on the credit cards.. one wonders how many man hours have gone into this..and dare I say it.. he should repay the taxpayer.. if he is found guilty of using Union funds to fund his campaign to get into govt... he got there by stealing... not on in my book. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by Dnarever on Oct 21st, 2012 at 7:55am
Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
If you can believe the information supplied about either then Jackson looks at least as dirty as Thomson, maybe worse. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by cods on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:37am Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 7:55am:
no one could be worse than THOMO wishful thinking on your part.. as gillard supported him through thick and thin.. he stole to get into parliament one of the charges against him... using union money to fund his election campaign.. Kathy Jackson in so a member of parliament.. nothing could be worse than an MP stealing to get into parliament.. but I am sure you will look really hard to find something..anything to make him look better than the lowest form of life. I really think this guy has been given enough support... and the more that comes out the worse its looking... not better like you all hoped. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by Dnarever on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:35am cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:37am:
he stole to get into parliament one of the charges against him... using union money to fund his election campaign.. Even the corrupted FWA investigation found that wasn't true. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by progressiveslol on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:38am Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:35am:
What about the police investigation. Have they stated anything close to it. Guess we may have to wait for him to be charged further. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by Dnarever on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:38am cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:37am:
She supported him to the cross benches and out of the Labor party. You don't need friends like that. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by the wise one on Oct 21st, 2012 at 2:08pm progressiveslol wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:08pm:
the web site I quote from Independent Australia The Political Sword The New Matilda and a lot more are lot more informative then the sites like kangaroo court and pickering sites that you post from. The all the sites I post from the contributors post links from other sites to back up their argument that has the evidence to support them. it is more then the sites you post from it is only one man opinion and you think it is gospel truth. But I can't be too hard on you lolly you need a brain to understand these things and as you are 16 and in the same class as 6 year old children I can imagine that your brain is not fully develop. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by cods on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:47pm Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:35am:
\can you put that up dna.........I am sure I read where that was one of the charges against him |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by cods on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:48pm Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:38am:
after 12 months of support... or would you prefer to forget that bit? |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by cods on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:55pm John S wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 2:08pm:
since when???? I have only ever seen the "independent"... pages from it from you and your alto ego valleyboy doing its level best to blame someone else for THOMOs position has the independent called on anyone to take him to court like pickering has..??????? he is very bold if he doesnt have something else he isnt letting go of.. and gillard and THOMO know what its most likely to be.. just for you I mainly read the papers.. these other privately owned webs that never use the owners name worry me...they could be run by terrorists for all I know.. at least everyone knows pickering. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by the wise one on Oct 21st, 2012 at 4:15pm cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:55pm:
you don't look at things much do you cods this is a bit from Alan Jones greatest Hits http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1350767031 have a look at the bits in red and those are links back to other web site to back up the argument Quote:
If you go back to the original article that I posted and click onto any of those links it will take you to a web site that will back up the article. Where are the ones from Pickering to back up his article? |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by progressiveslol on Oct 21st, 2012 at 7:52pm John S wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 2:08pm:
good for you. If anyone believes the crap they write are morons. You dont really think you can say whatever you like about what I link to and get nothing in reply do you. Escpecially with the crap from that labor site you link to. You must be Tarded |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by Dnarever on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:17pm cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:48pm:
People should get the benifit of the doubt for as long as is reasonable. Remember 3 or 4 investigations with no charges and only ongoing because the Liberals kept digging it up even when the ploice were saying that it was dead. Waiting for the damaged fair work investigation to complete was only reasonable. She did need some reason to take action. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by aquascoot on Oct 22nd, 2012 at 7:18am
i still think kathy is incredibly hot. i could forgive thommo if he paid her for sex and that wouldnt have even affected the HSU budget
|
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by cods on Oct 22nd, 2012 at 7:47am John S wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 4:15pm:
ahhhhhhhhhhhh you assume to much I am afraid I hardly read you...so I thought you meant when you post your original threads by independent.. my mistake... but never assume anything about myself...I am very interested in this subject...that is the only reason I read your piece.. in the mean time neither you nor the independent interest me.. |
|
Title: Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge Post by cods on Oct 22nd, 2012 at 7:58am Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:17pm:
excuses excuses excuse. sorry dna.. I cant believe the lengths you go to to excuse this govts behaviour.. she supported him for over 12 months.. during that time they managed to promote the man that was overseeing the investigation into THOMO so it was all stalled.. by the time this started to get into the media..it was all ready in the FWA hands for many many months.. it wasnt 3 or 4 investigations.. it was one.. into misusing union funds..... Kathy Jackson was advised to give her suspicions.to FWA... yes I am sure you would LOVE this to die and just go away..no one from the right is surprised at that dna...it must be a real salt in the wound for you everytime you see a new thread.. suck it up sunshine.. its going to get wors.e. good on the libs.. you never give them credit for anything... this time hopfully it will be those union members... you know the ones the people you dont care about...[as you would wish this would die... bugger those libs] get the money back... money they worked for and didnt intend to buy houses or pay for brothel visits...sorry us libs are such bad people. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |