What's with Christopher Pyne accusing Anthony Albenese of sexism for using the term 'bloke'.

They just don't get it.

Neither do MOST trying to make an issue out of recent events.

It's nothing but a storm in a B-cup.... ;)

The sooner the whole thing fades into the obscurity it so richly deserves, the better.

So Pyne can say Gillards a good chick. A top sheila. The mysoginists and misandrists in labor would be all over him.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:25pm:

So Pyne can say Gillards a good chick. A top sheila. The mysoginists and misandrists in labor would be all over him.

Right on cue, thanks, progs.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:25pm:

So Pyne can say Gillards a good chick. A top sheila. The mysoginists and misandrists in labor would be all over him.

I would pay good money to see Pyne say: Gillards a good chick. A top sheila.


He would get an Oscar if he could pull it off convincingly.

Quote:

Liberal Christopher Pyne accused Labor minister Anthony Albanese of sexism for calling an Opposition MP "a good bloke". ...Mr Pyne appealed to the Speaker that if he had referred to a Labor woman as a sheila "I'd be accused of a sexist remark".

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/question-time-business-as-usual/story-e6frg6n6-1226492953202

Calling an opposition male MP a good bloke is not sexism.....It is just highly unlikely that is was a true statement.....Pyne is a fools fool IMO!!!

;) ;) ;)

philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:39pm:

Quote: Liberal Christopher Pyne accused Labor minister Anthony Albanese of sexism for calling an Opposition MP "a good bloke". ...Mr Pyne appealed to the Speaker that if he had referred to a Labor woman as a sheila "I'd be accused of a sexist remark". http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/question-time-business-as-usual/story-e6frg6n6-1226492953202 Calling an opposition male MP a good bloke is not sexism.....It is just highly unlikely that is was a true statement.....Pyne is a fools fool IMO!!! ;) ;) ;)

The moles, the chicks, the dogs in labor would be all over him. Was that sexist. No according to you lot.

The Male Patriarchy in Afghanistan shot a little girl in the head in Afghanistan today because she defied and disobeyed them and attended school...that is Misogyny...I never heard of women treating men like that...Woman is the N1gger of the world...woman is the slave of the slaves...Men shoot little girls because they are little girls...
Woman Is the N1gger of the World / John Lennon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Asf4InKVo8k
You gotta be a real halfwit  to try and claim men are the victims as well....
8-) 8-)

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:30pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:25pm: So Pyne can say Gillards a good chick. A top sheila. The mysoginists and misandrists in labor would be all over him. Right on cue, thanks, progs.

Oh thats right. It is only sexism because you say so. It is only right or wrong when you say so. I can only be offended when you say it is offend worthy.

I dont follow your ideology, so what you say I need to do, need to know, need to feel, does not work outside of your world.

So right on cue MOTR with your ideology bullying.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:47pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:30pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:25pm: So Pyne can say Gillards a good chick. A top sheila. The mysoginists and misandrists in labor would be all over him. Right on cue, thanks, progs. Oh thats right. It is only sexism because you say so. It is only right or wrong when you say so. I can only be offended when you say it is offend worthy. I dont follow your ideology, so what you say I need to do, need to know, need to feel, does not work outside of your world. So right on cue MOTR with your ideology bullying.

I heard that very line on 2GB this afternoon, look Mrs Marsh it does get in.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:43pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:39pm: Quote: Liberal Christopher Pyne accused Labor minister Anthony Albanese of sexism for calling an Opposition MP "a good bloke". ...Mr Pyne appealed to the Speaker that if he had referred to a Labor woman as a sheila "I'd be accused of a sexist remark". http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/question-time-business-as-usual/story-e6frg6n6-1226492953202 Calling an opposition male MP a good bloke is not sexism.....It is just highly unlikely that is was a true statement.....Pyne is a fools fool IMO!!! ;) ;) ;) The moles, the chicks, the dogs in labor would be all over him. Was that sexist. No according to you lot.

Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain???

::) ::) ::)

But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look.

Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance.

Its sexism and misogyny if you hate women and regard them as less than your equal...Abbot has undenied form there and no leg to stand on... :) :)

philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:43pm: philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:39pm: Quote: Liberal Christopher Pyne accused Labor minister Anthony Albanese of sexism for calling an Opposition MP "a good bloke". ...Mr Pyne appealed to the Speaker that if he had referred to a Labor woman as a sheila "I'd be accused of a sexist remark". http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/question-time-business-as-usual/story-e6frg6n6-1226492953202 Calling an opposition male MP a good bloke is not sexism.....It is just highly unlikely that is was a true statement.....Pyne is a fools fool IMO!!! ;) ;) ;) The moles, the chicks, the dogs in labor would be all over him. Was that sexist. No according to you lot. Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain??? ::) ::) ::)

Because we are talking about all the touchy feely people in parliament. One for all. The parliament is not a pub and the women are all freaking out. So again, one for all.

Shane B wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance.

Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain???

::) ::) ::)

Prevailing wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:58pm:

Its sexism and misogyny if you hate women and regard them as less than your equal...Abbot has undenied form there and no leg to stand on... :) :)

And some words have a history of being used to articulate these ideas. Words like 'bloke' don't.

Shane B wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:56pm:

But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance.

Now that was a strong woman amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours.

I condemn Male violence against women and misogyny in any form...
:) :)

philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:02pm:

Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain??? ::) ::) ::)

Excellent question, phil.

Misogynists have no leg to stand on every word they utter against women condemns them... :) :)

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:04pm:

Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Now that was a strong woman amognst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours.

There you go again, progs. What does Gillard's performance have to do with the next female politician that comes along.

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:10pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:04pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Now that was a strong woman amognst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. There you go again, progs. What does Gillard's performance have to do with the next female politician that comes along.

I dont know what you are on about. Maybe you read wrong.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:13pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:10pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:04pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Now that was a strong woman amognst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. There you go again, progs. What does Gillard's performance have to do with the next female politician that comes along. I dont know what you are on about. Maybe you read wrong.

Explain what you meant by Gillard and the women in Labor not doing women in general any favours?

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:05pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:02pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain??? ::) ::) ::) Excellent question, phil.

It's clear as day to me that Pyne was being facetious.

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:17pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:13pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:10pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:04pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Now that was a strong woman amognst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. There you go again, progs. What does Gillard's performance have to do with the next female politician that comes along. I dont know what you are on about. Maybe you read wrong. Explain what you meant by Gillard and the women in Labor not doing women in general any favours?

Well my statement was a seperation of a nobody and then the 'most women in labor'.

Shane B wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:05pm: philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:02pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain??? ::) ::) ::) Excellent question, phil. It's clear as day to me that Pyne was being facetious.

But rightly so.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:20pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:17pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:13pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:10pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:04pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Now that was a strong woman amognst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. There you go again, progs. What does Gillard's performance have to do with the next female politician that comes along. I dont know what you are on about. Maybe you read wrong. Explain what you meant by Gillard and the women in Labor not doing women in general any favours? Well my statement was a seperation of a nobody and then the 'most women in labor'.

That doesn't make it any clearer.

Shane B wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:05pm: philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:02pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain??? ::) ::) ::) Excellent question, phil. It's clear as day to me that Pyne was being facetious.

And what specifically was his irony directed at?

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:24pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:20pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:17pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:13pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:10pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:04pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Now that was a strong woman amognst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. There you go again, progs. What does Gillard's performance have to do with the next female politician that comes along. I dont know what you are on about. Maybe you read wrong. Explain what you meant by Gillard and the women in Labor not doing women in general any favours? Well my statement was a seperation of a nobody and then the 'most women in labor'. That doesn't make it any clearer.

Well I dont know how to answer your question and how it relates to Gillard being a nobody.

Shane B wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:18pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:05pm: philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:02pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain??? ::) ::) ::) Excellent question, phil. It's clear as day to me that Pyne was being facetious.

Context Shane.....Pyne completely misses the point when he makes such a stupid statement.....All Pyne has done is defend the allegation that some members of the Coalition just do not understand what comments are unacceptable in the context they are said....Pyne needs to understand that being a good bloke is not a bad thing.....Being a smart ass is a bad thing!!!

::) ::) ::)

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:28pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:24pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:20pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:17pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:13pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:10pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:04pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Now that was a strong woman amognst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. There you go again, progs. What does Gillard's performance have to do with the next female politician that comes along. I dont know what you are on about. Maybe you read wrong. Explain what you meant by Gillard and the women in Labor not doing women in general any favours? Well my statement was a seperation of a nobody and then the 'most women in labor'. That doesn't make it any clearer. Well I dont know how to answer your question and how it relates to Gillard being a nobody.

I'm asking you to clarify your point that Gillard's performance as PM is not doing women in general any favours.

philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:30pm:

Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:18pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:05pm: philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:02pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Leaving Pynes' bullshit aside for one moment.....How is one bloke calling another bloke a good bloke sexism.....Care to explain??? ::) ::) ::) Excellent question, phil. It's clear as day to me that Pyne was being facetious. Context Shane.....Pyne completely misses the point when he makes such a stupid statement.....All Pyne has done is defend the allegation that some members of the Coalition just do not understand what comments are unacceptable in the context they are said....Pyne needs to understand that being a good bloke is not a bad thing.....Being a smart ass is a bad thing!!! ::) ::) ::)

No, it goes to show how pedantic the women and some men are in labor. You cant make the rules on what other people find sexist or offensive. If we could, we would stop the whining from the ladies in labor.

The women may be right, but pyne may be equally right. You want to dismiss Pyne, then equally all other complaints can be dismissed.

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:36pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:28pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:24pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:20pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:17pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:13pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:10pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:04pm: Shane B wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:56pm: But Gillard was accusing Tony Abbott of being sexist and misogynistic, while implicitly supporting Peter Slipper, the purveyor of clearly leud and inappropriate text messages. Not a good look. Margaret Thatcher never resorted to shrieks of sexism and misogny when the heat was on. She didn't need to, being a lady of conviction and substance. Now that was a strong woman amognst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. There you go again, progs. What does Gillard's performance have to do with the next female politician that comes along. I dont know what you are on about. Maybe you read wrong. Explain what you meant by Gillard and the women in Labor not doing women in general any favours? Well my statement was a seperation of a nobody and then the 'most women in labor'. That doesn't make it any clearer. Well I dont know how to answer your question and how it relates to Gillard being a nobody. I'm asking you to clarify your point that Gillard's performance as PM is not doing women in general any favours.

You must be in the wrong thread.

I can simply sit here all night and point out that if you are a misogynist...you are guilty of violence against women...and I can do this all night... :) :)

It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement.


Quote:

Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours.

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:58pm:

It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours.

Violent aggressive people like Gillard & Thatcher are never strong people, they are Nazis... :) :)

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 8:58pm:

It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours.

Gillard is a nobody.

Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her.

Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word.

Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again.

Thatcher was not a strong person, she was a violent aggressive thug...violent and aggressive = Nazi... :) :)

I can sit here all night exposing you for the imbecile you are... :) :)

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:05pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again.

So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs.

Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments.

I condemn misogyny and male violence against women in all of its forms... :) :)

What Are We Fighting For...Woodstock...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk68D91hTXw :D :D

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:16pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:05pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again. So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs. Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments.

For starters, I am not a woman or one of the women who suggested not voting for another woman.

Second, you refer to me being sexist. I dont hear the women in parliament calling my name. Thank goodness for that.

Third, you would need to ask the women who are suggesting they would not vote for another woman. My guess is that they know their sex well and see the emotional outburst as a poor trait of their gender. That was only a suggestion. I dont know.

If you dont want to vote for another man, that is your issue and you wouldnt be the first person to make that claim. I am certain there were women who voted gillard just because she was a woman. What are you going to do about it. Nothing.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:28pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:16pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:05pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again. So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs. Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments. For starters, I am not a woman or one of the women who suggested not voting for another woman. Second, you refer to me being sexist. I dont hear the women in parliament calling my name. Thank goodness for that. Third, you would need to ask the women who are suggesting they would not vote for another woman. My guess is that they know their sex well and see the emotional outburst as a poor trait of their gender. That was only a suggestion. I dont know. If you dont want to vote for another man, that is your issue and you wouldnt be the first person to make that claim. I am certain there were women who voted gillard just because she was a woman. What are you going to do about it. Nothing.

thats a matter of opinion .....

John Smith wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:32pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:28pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:16pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:05pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again. So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs. Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments. For starters, I am not a woman or one of the women who suggested not voting for another woman. Second, you refer to me being sexist. I dont hear the women in parliament calling my name. Thank goodness for that. Third, you would need to ask the women who are suggesting they would not vote for another woman. My guess is that they know their sex well and see the emotional outburst as a poor trait of their gender. That was only a suggestion. I dont know. If you dont want to vote for another man, that is your issue and you wouldnt be the first person to make that claim. I am certain there were women who voted gillard just because she was a woman. What are you going to do about it. Nothing. thats a matter of opinion .....

We like opinions around here. Oh look, they were right. Every A hole has one.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:33pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:32pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:28pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:16pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:05pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again. So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs. Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments. For starters, I am not a woman or one of the women who suggested not voting for another woman. Second, you refer to me being sexist. I dont hear the women in parliament calling my name. Thank goodness for that. Third, you would need to ask the women who are suggesting they would not vote for another woman. My guess is that they know their sex well and see the emotional outburst as a poor trait of their gender. That was only a suggestion. I dont know. If you dont want to vote for another man, that is your issue and you wouldnt be the first person to make that claim. I am certain there were women who voted gillard just because she was a woman. What are you going to do about it. Nothing. thats a matter of opinion ..... We like opinions around here. Oh look, they were right. Every A hole has one.

Is that your way of saying you like A holes? are you sure your not Alan Jones ?

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:28pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:16pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:05pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again. So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs. Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments. For starters, I am not a woman or one of the women who suggested not voting for another woman. Second, you refer to me being sexist. I dont hear the women in parliament calling my name. Thank goodness for that. Third, you would need to ask the women who are suggesting they would not vote for another woman. My guess is that they know their sex well and see the emotional outburst as a poor trait of their gender. That was only a suggestion. I dont know. If you dont want to vote for another man, that is your issue and you wouldnt be the first person to make that claim. I am certain there were women who voted gillard just because she was a woman. What are you going to do about it. Nothing.

http://joemccoubrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/brick-wall.jpg

Seriously, progs, thanks for being such a compliant case study.

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:28pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:16pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:05pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again. So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs. Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments. For starters, I am not a woman or one of the women who suggested not voting for another woman. Second, you refer to me being sexist. I dont hear the women in parliament calling my name. Thank goodness for that. Third, you would need to ask the women who are suggesting they would not vote for another woman. My guess is that they know their sex well and see the emotional outburst as a poor trait of their gender. That was only a suggestion. I dont know. If you dont want to vote for another man, that is your issue and you wouldnt be the first person to make that claim. I am certain there were women who voted gillard just because she was a woman. What are you going to do about it. Nothing. http://joemccoubrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/brick-wall.jpg Seriously, progs, thanks for being such a compliant case study.

don't bother ... the scary part is that as crazy as prevailing sounds on this forum , he often makes more sense than progs

MOTR wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:28pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:16pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:05pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again. So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs. Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments. For starters, I am not a woman or one of the women who suggested not voting for another woman. Second, you refer to me being sexist. I dont hear the women in parliament calling my name. Thank goodness for that. Third, you would need to ask the women who are suggesting they would not vote for another woman. My guess is that they know their sex well and see the emotional outburst as a poor trait of their gender. That was only a suggestion. I dont know. If you dont want to vote for another man, that is your issue and you wouldnt be the first person to make that claim. I am certain there were women who voted gillard just because she was a woman. What are you going to do about it. Nothing. http://joemccoubrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/brick-wall.jpg Seriously, progs, thanks for being such a compliant case study.

Typical lefty loon.

I even stated it was a suggestion. I did not say it was true or indicative. I had to make one so you could follow easier. you do have trouble sometimes. Tonight being no exception.

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 9:43pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:40pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:28pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:16pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 9:05pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 8:58pm: It's not difficult, progs. Explain what you meant by this statement. Quote: Now that was a strong woman (Thatcher) amongst strong men. Gillard is a nobody and most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours. Gillard is a nobody. Thatcher is a strong woman just as strong as the men who surrounded her. Most of the women in labor are not doing women in general any favours by looking like whingey cry baby prats that react emotionally at every word. Gillard talks about women are sick of it.... I hear women are sick of it, but of the girls going off and crying about every little word they dont like. Women are suggesting they will never vote for another woman again. So it's not you being sexist, it's other women. I guess that makes it alright, progs. Why aren't those of us pissed off with Abbott considering never voting for another male. Are you starting to get the underlying sexism in some of your ridiculous comments. For starters, I am not a woman or one of the women who suggested not voting for another woman. Second, you refer to me being sexist. I dont hear the women in parliament calling my name. Thank goodness for that. Third, you would need to ask the women who are suggesting they would not vote for another woman. My guess is that they know their sex well and see the emotional outburst as a poor trait of their gender. That was only a suggestion. I dont know. If you dont want to vote for another man, that is your issue and you wouldnt be the first person to make that claim. I am certain there were women who voted gillard just because she was a woman. What are you going to do about it. Nothing. http://joemccoubrey.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/brick-wall.jpg Seriously, progs, thanks for being such a compliant case study. Typical lefty loon. I even stated it was a suggestion. I did not say it was true or indicative. I had to make one so you could follow easier. you do have trouble sometimes. Tonight being no exception.

backpeddle backpeddle backpeddle backpeddle backpeddle backpeddle

i was having a think about this last nite and i always try to understand the dynamics of the ecosystem.

heres my take from a slightly different angle.

journos are seeing their jobs disappear.
political journos are poo scared theyre going to be the next ones at centrelink
they KNOW the economy , balanced budgets etc  (ie the important stuff) is boring and wont move copy.

they know gay marriage, misogyny, texts with the word c..t ,tony abbott punching walls, alan jones being secretly taped etc  is far more likely to get people to read and therefore save their own jobs and their own arses by shifting some papers

we can expect more of these "non stories" as the average consumer continues to be dumbed down and whines about
"where's my cash splash julia or tony"

meanwhile the singapore government super fund just brought another $250 million dollar shopping centre i shop at.


sad times

enjoy your gutter journalism while it lasts.
hopefully be interesting reading for the masses in the soon to be created centrelink queues ::) ::) ::)

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10^th, 2012 at 7:47pm:

MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:30pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:25pm: So Pyne can say Gillards a good chick. A top sheila. The mysoginists and misandrists in labor would be all over him. Right on cue, thanks, progs. Oh thats right. It is only sexism because you say so. It is only right or wrong when you say so. I can only be offended when you say it is offend worthy. I dont follow your ideology, so what you say I need to do, need to know, need to feel, does not work outside of your world. So right on cue MOTR with your ideology bullying.

Yes, Slipper compares a sea creature to a certain part of the female genitalia (among other text messages) and shows clear bias against Sophie Mirabella in his vile texts, but not a peep from Labor's women. Abbott is claimed to have hit a wall near a woman decades ago with no proof offered and all hell breaks loose. The women of the ALP rise up -feel our wrath! Funny, that.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 11^th, 2012 at 6:21am:

progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:47pm: MOTR wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:30pm: progressiveslol wrote on Oct 10th, 2012 at 7:25pm: So Pyne can say Gillards a good chick. A top sheila. The mysoginists and misandrists in labor would be all over him. Right on cue, thanks, progs. Oh thats right. It is only sexism because you say so. It is only right or wrong when you say so. I can only be offended when you say it is offend worthy. I dont follow your ideology, so what you say I need to do, need to know, need to feel, does not work outside of your world. So right on cue MOTR with your ideology bullying. Yes, Slipper compares a sea creature to a certain part of the female genitalia (among other text messages) and shows clear bias against Sophie Mirabella in his vile texts, but not a peep from Labor's women. Abbott is claimed to have hit a wall near a woman decades ago with no proof offered and all hell breaks loose. The women of the ALP rise up -feel our wrath! Funny, that.

Well now that they all supported slipper, they had better expect some backlash of their own if they try and use this pathetic weak push against the men of the liberal party.

The Labor Party has shown it self to be the Anti Bloke party, where men are no longer allowed to be men.. Gillard plays the Sexist Victim Card to hide the fact she does not have what it takes to run the country. What has this country come to when parliament time is wasted on someone who plays a professional Victim. What she has proven is women are not suitable to Govern. I know that some people might find that offencive. But when a leader uses the sexist card to stifle debate just shows she is not a true leader.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Oct 11^th, 2012 at 6:52am:

The Labor Party has shown it self to be the Anti Bloke party, where men are no longer allowed to be men.. Gillard plays the Sexist Victim Card to hide the fact she does not have what it takes to run the country. What has this country come to when parliament time is wasted on someone who plays a professional Victim. What she has proven is women are not suitable to Govern. I know that some people might find that offencive. But when a leader uses the sexist card to stifle debate just shows she is not a true leader.

 

ripper, being a bloke, i dont express opinions on these things as the small percentage of women who are rampant feminazis make A LOT of noise.

i did a straw poll around the office last nite and most of the receptionists, young and old, think she is a hopeless role model and a failure.

they thought she looked like a crazy bitch and thought tony looked like HE was being victimized by some mad skanky ho.

i know all the feminist journos think its a great big turning point but they dont live in middle suburban australia where most women know , you dont get anywhere carrying on like that.

i think it will be very interesting to see if she goes up in the polls.
ive said it before,  these female commentators live in an echo chamber and they dont read the common man or woman very well.

either that or i dont ;D ;D ;D

Slipper's behaviour was unconscionable, Gillard supported his presence in the house to hold onto her very tenuous grip on power.

She played it against Abbott for all she was worth. The drama Queen lives!

red baron wrote on Oct 11^th, 2012 at 7:21am:

Slipper's behaviour was unconscionable, Gillard supported his presence in the house to hold onto her very tenuous grip on power. She played it against Abbott for all she was worth. The drama Queen lives!

Yep, and now it's come back to bite her in her ample backside big time!

Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 11^th, 2012 at 8:02am:

red baron wrote on Oct 11th, 2012 at 7:21am: Slipper's behaviour was unconscionable, Gillard supported his presence in the house to hold onto her very tenuous grip on power. She played it against Abbott for all she was worth. The drama Queen lives! Yep, and now it's come back to bite her in her ample backside big time!

how exactly? she's back where she was at the start of this ... Slipper is a liberal MP, not labor ... if anything it reflects badly on the libs who preselected him 8 or 9 times knowing he was dodgy ..