Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1345714577

Message started by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:36pm

Title: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:36pm
Thomson has been attacked in the same manner as Gillard and she says Thomson is subject to a sexist smear campaign.

http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breaking-news-blog/gillard-ive-been-the-subject-of-a-very-sexist-smear-campaign/20120823-24o7r.html

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by MOTR on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:40pm

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.


Is progs one of those mysoginist nutjobs that Julia warned us about?

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by MOTR on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:42pm

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:36pm:
Thomson has been attacked in the same manner as Gillard and she says Thomson is subject to a sexist smear campaign.

http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breaking-news-blog/gillard-ive-been-the-subject-of-a-very-sexist-smear-campaign/20120823-24o7r.html


Wrong link, progs. Nothing in this link about Thomson.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:43pm

MOTR wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.


Is progs one of those mysoginist nutjobs that Julia warned us about?

Hey this is a story about women, misandrists, being sexist toward Thomson.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by FriYAY on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 8:26pm
Gillard's got some balls.

Dealt with the greens/ind to form government.

Pushed through a carbon tax, she wanted it anyway, so no moral issue.

Went with the boat people plan and got an intake of people, so no moral issue.

Mining tax....hmmm, we'll see.

Plain fag packets - fair enough - wish i never had my first.

Stood there as they axed O'Lemon. The most popular dude ever.

Stood there today and answered questions about this slush fund/union thing (another waste of time and money)

Honestly, she is crapping all over Abbott. He is starting to sound (more) like an idiot.

:-/

I can see some more support swing to her.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by skippy. on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 8:54pm
Gillard has been on the front foot since last weeks announcement on refugees. Abbott never expected her to give in to Nauru and he has been on the backfoot ever since. Gillard has well and truly owned the last week or so,no matter what has been thrown at her, she is fair dinkum looking like she is in control.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Phallic Baldwin on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:12pm
Gillard has momentum right now. Whether she maintains it is another story.Will be an interesting 12 months.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by woof woof on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:17pm
fact remains she is despised, and will be hammered next election, shes a proven liar.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by skippy. on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:23pm

woof woof wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:17pm:
fact remains she is despised, and will be hammered next election, shes a proven liar.

yes she is,BUT so is Abbott they both share the EXACT SAME approval rating!after the last week or so after all the lies and smear thrown at her she has prevailed and looks better than Abbott, it's game on.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by John Smith on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:36pm

MOTR wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.


Is progs one of those mysoginist nutjobs that Julia warned us about?


i suspect you might be onto something there ....

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by skippy. on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:47pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:36pm:

MOTR wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.


Is progs one of those mysoginist nutjobs that Julia warned us about?


i suspect you might be onto something there ....

Yea, looking at what the gov have been saying  over the past couple of days it makes me think some of them read these forums, if not someone in their office. I heard Swan say yesterday that the nut jobs on the Internet were stoking theses stories and straight away thought of prog  and armpit and prevailing. Then Roxan said that stories are getting a run in the main stream press after originating in cyber space where anyone can make any accusation and some of the lazy pricks at news Lmd pick it up and run with it as facts.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:49pm

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:47pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:36pm:

MOTR wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.


Is progs one of those mysoginist nutjobs that Julia warned us about?


i suspect you might be onto something there ....

Yea, looking at what the gov have been saying  over the past couple of days it makes me think some of them read these forums, if not someone in their office. I heard Swan say yesterday that the nut jobs on the Internet were stoking theses stories and straight away thought of prog  and armpit and prevailing. Then Roxan said that stories are getting a run in the main stream press after originating in cyber space where anyone can make any accusation and some of the lazy pricks at news Lmd pick it up and run with it as facts.

Yeh, I know what you mean. When I hear the words corruption, I think of labor, when I hear lack of integrity, I think of labor and their mushrooms on here.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by skippy. on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:52pm

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:49pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:47pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:36pm:

MOTR wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.


Is progs one of those mysoginist nutjobs that Julia warned us about?


i suspect you might be onto something there ....

Yea, looking at what the gov have been saying  over the past couple of days it makes me think some of them read these forums, if not someone in their office. I heard Swan say yesterday that the nut jobs on the Internet were stoking theses stories and straight away thought of prog  and armpit and prevailing. Then Roxan said that stories are getting a run in the main stream press after originating in cyber space where anyone can make any accusation and some of the lazy pricks at news Lmd pick it up and run with it as facts.

Yeh, I know what you mean. When I here the words corruption, I think of labor, when I here lack of integrity, I think of labor and their mushrooms on here.

I rest my case.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Shane B on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:53pm

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:49pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:47pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:36pm:

MOTR wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.


Is progs one of those mysoginist nutjobs that Julia warned us about?


i suspect you might be onto something there ....

Yea, looking at what the gov have been saying  over the past couple of days it makes me think some of them read these forums, if not someone in their office. I heard Swan say yesterday that the nut jobs on the Internet were stoking theses stories and straight away thought of prog  and armpit and prevailing. Then Roxan said that stories are getting a run in the main stream press after originating in cyber space where anyone can make any accusation and some of the lazy pricks at news Lmd pick it up and run with it as facts.

Yeh, I know what you mean. When I here the words corruption, I think of labor, when I here lack of integrity, I think of labor and their mushrooms on here.


Agreed.

Skippy isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, and Gillard outright lied today in trying to associate the accusations with the so called mysogimists and loons on the internet.

The accusations were raised in Parliament by Robert McClelland. None of this originated from the internet.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by skippy. on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:02pm
matty sounds pissed off she didn't get a jumper  as one of the loonies. Sorry matty having the most sox doesn't cut the mustard, it just makes you a sad old bag.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:04pm

Shane B wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:53pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:49pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:47pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:36pm:

MOTR wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:40pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:37pm:
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.


Is progs one of those mysoginist nutjobs that Julia warned us about?


i suspect you might be onto something there ....

Yea, looking at what the gov have been saying  over the past couple of days it makes me think some of them read these forums, if not someone in their office. I heard Swan say yesterday that the nut jobs on the Internet were stoking theses stories and straight away thought of prog  and armpit and prevailing. Then Roxan said that stories are getting a run in the main stream press after originating in cyber space where anyone can make any accusation and some of the lazy pricks at news Lmd pick it up and run with it as facts.

Yeh, I know what you mean. When I here the words corruption, I think of labor, when I here lack of integrity, I think of labor and their mushrooms on here.


Agreed.

Skippy isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, and Gillard outright lied today in trying to associate the accusations with the so called mysogimists and loons on the internet.

The accusations were raised in Parliament by Robert McClelland. None of this originated from the internet.

The internet has had the means to keep up against shut down.

Gillard has not made this go away.

She did this in surprise on purpose. The hard questions will come later.

She is too scared to shut larry pickering up because he will get discovery in court. Says alot really.

The bagman will have his bit to say soon. Hope he has some real evidence and pickering will keep going because he knows gillard will do nothing about taking him to court, because she knows the outcome for her and othrs. They would rather take the risk of public opinion, than court opinion.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by skippy. on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Shane B on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:08pm

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:02pm:
matty sounds pissed off she didn't get a jumper  as one of the loonies. Sorry matty having the most sox doesn't cut the mustard, it just makes you a sad old bag.


How is Uncle Stanley tonight Skip??


Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by skippy. on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:10pm

Shane B wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:08pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:02pm:
matty sounds pissed off she didn't get a jumper  as one of the loonies. Sorry matty having the most sox doesn't cut the mustard, it just makes you a sad old bag.


How is Uncle Stanley tonight Skip??


still doing the same old lines I see,matty.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by John Smith on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:21pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.

Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by John Smith on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:54pm

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.

Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.


you don't have to say it, you certainly implied it ... one example of many is

On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.

now if there is no evidence of any wrong doing why would you say that unless you thought she was guilty ... it would be a little like me saying 'there is no evidence of progs performing acts of beastiality, but she's not out of the woods yet'.... what would you say that implied?

why has not one of your comments being about the fact that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing?  like I said, stick to the voodoo doll ....

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:00pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.

Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.


you don't have to say it, you certainly implied it ... one example of many is

On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.

now if there is no evidence of any wrong doing why would you say that unless you thought she was guilty ... it would be a little like me saying 'there is no evidence of progs performing acts of beastiality, but she's not out of the woods yet'.... what would you say that implied?

why has not one of your comments being about the fact that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing?  like I said, stick to the voodoo doll ....

Most of my post are cut and paste, so you would need to refer the author.

As for 'not out of the woods', gillard ambushed the media that were not prepared with questions. She may have been advised to go for it now and without warning, but that does not make it go away. The questions that are well thought out will linger.

The fact the bagman has not had his day in the sun makes that a possible bad situation for gillard. If he has actual evidence that goes against what gillard said in public, on media, then its good night gillard.

Wilson is even shopping around for media dollars to air his information. Dont know what he has, good or bad for gillard, but if it is concrete evidence and conflicts with gillards statements today, then that may well mean good night for gillard as well.

It wouldn't be the first time labor adviser's have screwed up royally, actually it would not be the first 20 times.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by John Smith on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:09pm

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.

Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.


you don't have to say it, you certainly implied it ... one example of many is

On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.

now if there is no evidence of any wrong doing why would you say that unless you thought she was guilty ... it would be a little like me saying 'there is no evidence of progs performing acts of beastiality, but she's not out of the woods yet'.... what would you say that implied?

why has not one of your comments being about the fact that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing?  like I said, stick to the voodoo doll ....

Most of my post are cut and paste, so you would need to refer the author.

the author is you ...your second comment on this thread .... you've no idea what you are saying do you?

As for 'not out of the woods', gillard ambushed the media that were not prepared with questions. She may have been advised to go for it now and without warning, but that does not make it go away. The questions that are well thought out will linger.
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...

The fact the bagman has not had his day in the sun makes that a possible bad situation for gillard. If he has actual evidence that goes against what gillard said in public, on media, then its good night gillard.
what are you on about? who is bagman?

Wilson is even shopping around for media dollars to air his information. Dont know what he has, good or bad for gillard, but if it is concrete evidence and conflicts with gillards statements today, then that may well mean good night for gillard as well.
the fact that he is shopping around should be the first indication that he has no integrity, and if so why should he be believed ? didn't channel 9 pay for the story from the prostitue that slept with thommo? the one you were sure proved he was guilty? the one that wasn't even in this country at the time of the offense ?

It wouldn't be the first time labor adviser's have screwed up royally, actually it would not be the first 20 times.
thats got nothing to do with the price of eggs in China .


Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:13pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:09pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.

Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.


you don't have to say it, you certainly implied it ... one example of many is

On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.

now if there is no evidence of any wrong doing why would you say that unless you thought she was guilty ... it would be a little like me saying 'there is no evidence of progs performing acts of beastiality, but she's not out of the woods yet'.... what would you say that implied?

why has not one of your comments being about the fact that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing?  like I said, stick to the voodoo doll ....

Most of my post are cut and paste, so you would need to refer the author.

the author is you ...your second comment on this thread .... you've no idea what you are saying do you?

As for 'not out of the woods', gillard ambushed the media that were not prepared with questions. She may have been advised to go for it now and without warning, but that does not make it go away. The questions that are well thought out will linger.
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...

The fact the bagman has not had his day in the sun makes that a possible bad situation for gillard. If he has actual evidence that goes against what gillard said in public, on media, then its good night gillard.
what are you on about? who is bagman?

Wilson is even shopping around for media dollars to air his information. Dont know what he has, good or bad for gillard, but if it is concrete evidence and conflicts with gillards statements today, then that may well mean good night for gillard as well.
the fact that he is shopping around should be the first indication that he has no integrity, and if so why should he be believed ? didn't channel 9 pay for the story from the prostitue that slept with thommo? the one you were sure proved he was guilty? the one that wasn't even in this country at the time of the offense ?

It wouldn't be the first time labor adviser's have screwed up royally, actually it would not be the first 20 times.
thats got nothing to do with the price of eggs in China .


Quote:
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...


lol good luck with that piece of 'not living in reality'

Come over to reality already.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by John Smith on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:16pm

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:13pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:09pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.

Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.


you don't have to say it, you certainly implied it ... one example of many is

On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.

now if there is no evidence of any wrong doing why would you say that unless you thought she was guilty ... it would be a little like me saying 'there is no evidence of progs performing acts of beastiality, but she's not out of the woods yet'.... what would you say that implied?

why has not one of your comments being about the fact that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing?  like I said, stick to the voodoo doll ....

Most of my post are cut and paste, so you would need to refer the author.

the author is you ...your second comment on this thread .... you've no idea what you are saying do you?

As for 'not out of the woods', gillard ambushed the media that were not prepared with questions. She may have been advised to go for it now and without warning, but that does not make it go away. The questions that are well thought out will linger.
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...

The fact the bagman has not had his day in the sun makes that a possible bad situation for gillard. If he has actual evidence that goes against what gillard said in public, on media, then its good night gillard.
what are you on about? who is bagman?

Wilson is even shopping around for media dollars to air his information. Dont know what he has, good or bad for gillard, but if it is concrete evidence and conflicts with gillards statements today, then that may well mean good night for gillard as well.
the fact that he is shopping around should be the first indication that he has no integrity, and if so why should he be believed ? didn't channel 9 pay for the story from the prostitue that slept with thommo? the one you were sure proved he was guilty? the one that wasn't even in this country at the time of the offense ?

It wouldn't be the first time labor adviser's have screwed up royally, actually it would not be the first 20 times.
thats got nothing to do with the price of eggs in China .


Quote:
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...


lol good luck with that piece of 'not living in reality'

Come over to reality already.


let me know when Gillard is in jail ... then we can talk about reality

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:19pm

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:16pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:13pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:09pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.

Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.


you don't have to say it, you certainly implied it ... one example of many is

On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.

now if there is no evidence of any wrong doing why would you say that unless you thought she was guilty ... it would be a little like me saying 'there is no evidence of progs performing acts of beastiality, but she's not out of the woods yet'.... what would you say that implied?

why has not one of your comments being about the fact that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing?  like I said, stick to the voodoo doll ....

Most of my post are cut and paste, so you would need to refer the author.

the author is you ...your second comment on this thread .... you've no idea what you are saying do you?

As for 'not out of the woods', gillard ambushed the media that were not prepared with questions. She may have been advised to go for it now and without warning, but that does not make it go away. The questions that are well thought out will linger.
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...

The fact the bagman has not had his day in the sun makes that a possible bad situation for gillard. If he has actual evidence that goes against what gillard said in public, on media, then its good night gillard.
what are you on about? who is bagman?

Wilson is even shopping around for media dollars to air his information. Dont know what he has, good or bad for gillard, but if it is concrete evidence and conflicts with gillards statements today, then that may well mean good night for gillard as well.
the fact that he is shopping around should be the first indication that he has no integrity, and if so why should he be believed ? didn't channel 9 pay for the story from the prostitue that slept with thommo? the one you were sure proved he was guilty? the one that wasn't even in this country at the time of the offense ?

It wouldn't be the first time labor adviser's have screwed up royally, actually it would not be the first 20 times.
thats got nothing to do with the price of eggs in China .


Quote:
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...


lol good luck with that piece of 'not living in reality'

Come over to reality already.


let me know when Gillard is in jail ... then we can talk about reality

Now your talking. That would be reality.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Shane B on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:46pm
The question that remains unanswered from Gillard is that why did she help to register an association which she later described as a “slush fund” to re-elect Bruce Wilson, but which the application form claimed was to improving workplace safety, on behalf of the Australian Workers Union?

Gillard claimed at the press comference that the section of the application for registration which spelled out the association’s purpose was actually written by Ralph Blewett, he's Bruce Wilson's bagman, despite being in legal parlance. And Gillard also avoided answering a question whether she’d at least checked that part of the application.

We might have heard the last of this, but we might not. As progs said, the TV journalists have the chequebooks open and both Blewitt and Wilson may talk. However, they are likely to seek some immunity from prosecution, which they are unlikely to get.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Western Apologist on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:49pm
shame on pathetic hypocrites who have continued to ignore the point in my thread

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by buzzanddidj on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:57pm

Shane B wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:53pm:
The accusations were raised in Parliament by Robert McClelland. None of this originated from the internet.





The one skeleton in Gillard's closet is the allegation — first raised under parliamentary privilege in 1995 by former Kennett minister Phil Gude — that Gillard's one-time partner Bruce Wilson, a former secretary of the Australian Workers' Union, was under investigation by the National Crime Authority and Victoria Police over the misappropriation of union funds.

According to Gude, the union funds were used to renovate Gillard's house and buy her some personal items.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/no-bones-about-her/2007/09/08/1188783558418.html?page=fullpage





Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Shane B on Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:02am

buzzanddidj wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:57pm:

Shane B wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 9:53pm:
The accusations were raised in Parliament by Robert McClelland. None of this originated from the internet.





The one skeleton in Gillard's closet is the allegation — first raised under parliamentary privilege in 1995 by former Kennett minister Phil Gude — that Gillard's one-time partner Bruce Wilson, a former secretary of the Australian Workers' Union, was under investigation by the National Crime Authority and Victoria Police over the misappropriation of union funds.

According to Gude, the union funds were used to renovate Gillard's house and buy her some personal items.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/no-bones-about-her/2007/09/08/1188783558418.html?page=fullpage


Great, further strengthens that Gillard was loose with the truth in her press conference.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Spot of Borg on Aug 24th, 2012 at 5:40am

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 7:36pm:
Thomson has been attacked in the same manner as Gillard and she says Thomson is subject to a sexist smear campaign.

http://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/breaking-news-blog/gillard-ive-been-the-subject-of-a-very-sexist-smear-campaign/20120823-24o7r.html


That is pretty weird. the article doesnt mention thomson. It does mention sexism - briefly - and weirdly out of the blue with nothing to explain it. I think its just the media throwing crap together and calling it "news".

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Armchair_Politician on Aug 24th, 2012 at 6:19am

FriYAY wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 8:26pm:
Gillard's got some balls.

Dealt with the greens/ind to form government.

Pushed through a carbon tax, she wanted it anyway, so no moral issue.

Went with the boat people plan and got an intake of people, so no moral issue.

Mining tax....hmmm, we'll see.

Plain fag packets - fair enough - wish i never had my first.

Stood there as they axed O'Lemon. The most popular dude ever.

Stood there today and answered questions about this slush fund/union thing (another waste of time and money)

Honestly, she is crapping all over Abbott. He is starting to sound (more) like an idiot.

:-/

I can see some more support swing to her.


If you think that being a habitual liar is a demonstration of courage and all that is good with that woman, you're as deluded as she is.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by FriYAY on Aug 24th, 2012 at 10:17am

Armchair_Politician wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 6:19am:

FriYAY wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 8:26pm:
Gillard's got some balls.

Dealt with the greens/ind to form government.

Pushed through a carbon tax, she wanted it anyway, so no moral issue.

Went with the boat people plan and got an intake of people, so no moral issue.

Mining tax....hmmm, we'll see.

Plain fag packets - fair enough - wish i never had my first.

Stood there as they axed O'Lemon. The most popular dude ever.

Stood there today and answered questions about this slush fund/union thing (another waste of time and money)

Honestly, she is crapping all over Abbott. He is starting to sound (more) like an idiot.

:-/

I can see some more support swing to her.


If you think that being a habitual liar is a demonstration of courage and all that is good with that woman, you're as deluded as she is.


Sparkling comeback..... ::) ::)

Abbott is looking very sad right now.



Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by cods on Aug 24th, 2012 at 10:25am

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:16pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:13pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:09pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 11:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:54pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:21pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:

skippy. wrote on Aug 23rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.  :P matty is envious, it's a win win.

fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.

It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.


you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...

I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.

Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.


you don't have to say it, you certainly implied it ... one example of many is

On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet.

now if there is no evidence of any wrong doing why would you say that unless you thought she was guilty ... it would be a little like me saying 'there is no evidence of progs performing acts of beastiality, but she's not out of the woods yet'.... what would you say that implied?

why has not one of your comments being about the fact that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing?  like I said, stick to the voodoo doll ....

Most of my post are cut and paste, so you would need to refer the author.

the author is you ...your second comment on this thread .... you've no idea what you are saying do you?

As for 'not out of the woods', gillard ambushed the media that were not prepared with questions. She may have been advised to go for it now and without warning, but that does not make it go away. The questions that are well thought out will linger.
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...

The fact the bagman has not had his day in the sun makes that a possible bad situation for gillard. If he has actual evidence that goes against what gillard said in public, on media, then its good night gillard.
what are you on about? who is bagman?

Wilson is even shopping around for media dollars to air his information. Dont know what he has, good or bad for gillard, but if it is concrete evidence and conflicts with gillards statements today, then that may well mean good night for gillard as well.
the fact that he is shopping around should be the first indication that he has no integrity, and if so why should he be believed ? didn't channel 9 pay for the story from the prostitue that slept with thommo? the one you were sure proved he was guilty? the one that wasn't even in this country at the time of the offense ?

It wouldn't be the first time labor adviser's have screwed up royally, actually it would not be the first 20 times.
thats got nothing to do with the price of eggs in China .


Quote:
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...


lol good luck with that piece of 'not living in reality'

Come over to reality already.


let me know when Gillard is in jail ... then we can talk about reality




in the mean time she can sh!t all over you and leave the door wide open for future PM to behave in exactly the same way...

on ya sport.... one day this country could have a Muslim for a PM...I am sure they would relish all the presidents she is laying

like its alright to LIE through your teeth a week before and election...

its all right to never answer questions..

its alright to get someone sacked if they dared ask the wrong question.

its alright to shut down the media when it isnt saying what YOU want them too.

its alright to call a news conference with 2 hours notice..

on the pretense of telling the truth..and clearing the air..on certain subjects she wished would go away...but wont even though she has done her damndest to kill off the messengers..


aka Milne and Smith. two for starters.


yep I look forward to a country run by people who have no conscience or credibility..

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by cods on Aug 24th, 2012 at 10:28am
TRUST OR SLUSH

amazing...wonder when she plans on taking pickering to task???? >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

I' d like to see that

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 24th, 2012 at 11:09am

cods wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 10:28am:
TRUST OR SLUSH

amazing...wonder when she plans on taking pickering to task???? >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

I' d like to see that

Ironic how the word TRUST, is the word Gillard gets all upset about lol  ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Spot of Borg on Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:00pm

Quote:
on ya sport.... one day this country could have a Muslim for a PM...I am sure they would relish all the presidents she is laying


Does that make her a slut? Or an adulteress?

SOB

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by skippy. on Aug 24th, 2012 at 3:42pm

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:00pm:

Quote:
on ya sport.... one day this country could have a Muslim for a PM...I am sure they would relish all the presidents she is laying


Does that make her a slut? Or an adulteress?

SOB

LOL , cods thinks Gillard is laying Presidents now, which one? Obama.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by cods on Aug 24th, 2012 at 4:22pm

skippy. wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 3:42pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 12:00pm:

Quote:
on ya sport.... one day this country could have a Muslim for a PM...I am sure they would relish all the presidents she is laying


Does that make her a slut? Or an adulteress?

SOB

LOL , cods thinks Gillard is laying Presidents now, which one? Obama.




hahahah well others know what I mean... I know its hard for someone like you.

but  I dont like putting people down.


hey just over one line... wow

would like to give you an e for effort.. but.... well... its hardly debatable is it.

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Gist on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:20pm
Two bad polls and a week of Abbott looking as useful as a limp dildo and only half as desirable and the the righties are sweating beads of desperation. What a joy to behold.

Yessir, I think I will have a second beer.  8-) 8-)

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:34pm

Gist wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:20pm:
Two bad polls and a week of Abbott looking as useful as a limp dildo and only half as desirable and the the righties are sweating beads of desperation. What a joy to behold.

Yessir, I think I will have a second beer.  8-) 8-)

I would be lapping it up too, considering you had labor sitting at their lowest numbers for many many months. The only problem is the coming down from your perceived joy when you figure that the numbers were just an anomaly

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by Gist on Aug 25th, 2012 at 9:34am

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:34pm:

Gist wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:20pm:
Two bad polls and a week of Abbott looking as useful as a limp dildo and only half as desirable and the the righties are sweating beads of desperation. What a joy to behold.

Yessir, I think I will have a second beer.  8-) 8-)

I would be lapping it up too, considering you had labor sitting at their lowest numbers for many many months. The only problem is the coming down from your perceived joy when you figure that the numbers were just an anomaly


You mean you're going to go with
ROGUE POLL??!?




Oh the desperation from you guys is palpable!  ;D ;D

Title: Re: Gillard says women are being sexist toward Thomson
Post by progressiveslol on Aug 25th, 2012 at 1:59pm

Gist wrote on Aug 25th, 2012 at 9:34am:

progressiveslol wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:34pm:

Gist wrote on Aug 24th, 2012 at 8:20pm:
Two bad polls and a week of Abbott looking as useful as a limp dildo and only half as desirable and the the righties are sweating beads of desperation. What a joy to behold.

Yessir, I think I will have a second beer.  8-) 8-)

I would be lapping it up too, considering you had labor sitting at their lowest numbers for many many months. The only problem is the coming down from your perceived joy when you figure that the numbers were just an anomaly


You mean you're going to go with
ROGUE POLL??!?




Oh the desperation from you guys is palpable!  ;D ;D

No, im going with the fall will be hard to take after the high, if that is what you call I high. I guess you can for labor.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.