| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Swan confused over hypotheticals http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1338854324 Message started by Maqqa on Jun 5th, 2012 at 9:58am |
|
|
Title: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by Maqqa on Jun 5th, 2012 at 9:58am
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/national/13868526/swan-wont-talk-about-budget-deficit/
Treasurer Wayne Swan is refusing to say whether he will allow the federal budget to remain in deficit to help absorb the shock of another global economic crisis. Mr Swan said he would not deal with "those hypotheticals" when quizzed by reporters in Canberra on Tuesday. "This government has a proven track record of dealing with global instability," he said. The government plans to have the budget back in the black in 2012/13, but with a slim surplus of $1.5 billion. Mr Swan insisted the economic outlook for Australia was positive despite global challenges, citing growth, job creation, a healthy banking system and a "really strong" investment pipeline. "Australians can have confidence that we do face these challenges from a position of strength," he said. The coalition has said it will allow the automatic fiscal stabilisers to operate if another crisis occurred. |
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by Maqqa on Jun 5th, 2012 at 10:01am
he won't deal with hypotheticals?
Here's some news for you Swanie The Budget you delivered in May is a HYPOTHETICAL! Last year's Budget - that was also hypothetical because the deficit came in at $43B and you predict it to be $21B And the Budget before that - you also missed the mark And the one before that!!! So there goes your credibility in dealing with economic crisis |
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by Spot of Borg on Jun 5th, 2012 at 10:52am
Most pollies wont deal with hypotheticals. I think its because of what happened to bob hawk when he went on that show "hypothetical" and they asked him if he had to have life saving surgery and his 3 choices of doctor were a doctor who was smoking weed or a doctor who was on heroin or a doctor who was drunk he had to choose the drunk. lol.
SOB |
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by adelcrow on Jun 5th, 2012 at 10:58am
Maqqa wants a recession or maybe even a 1930's style depression..because after all there are no public victims in the game of politics
|
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by Maqqa on Jun 5th, 2012 at 1:51pm adelcrow wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 10:58am:
If a recession is what's need to teach laborites never to trust a Labor politician again then so be it!! But you guys are too stupid to know the difference!! |
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by Gist on Jun 5th, 2012 at 2:40pm Maqqa wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
So bad government, general economic malaise, people out of work, industries going to the wall is all OK with you as long as it helps the Lieberal cause? Well, at least your honest about your bias! ;D |
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by adelcrow on Jun 5th, 2012 at 2:44pm Gist wrote on Jun 5th, 2012 at 2:40pm:
Its about time we got down to the truth of the matter..Maqqa only cares about Abbotts job security..not about the economy or the people of Australia. |
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by cods on Jun 5th, 2012 at 2:46pm
didnt swanny have a massive $21billion safety net before the last recession..
this time round he has a massive debt doesnt he??? or maybe that doesnt make any difference with his budgeting |
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by Prevailing on Jun 5th, 2012 at 2:54pm
When we become a Repubic and take back our assets and country, the oligarchs will not be allowed to practice usury, profit from gambling, take excessive productive value of labor or tax food, alcohol, water consumption, cigarets or alcohol and financial penalties for speeding fines will be abolished being replaced by a points demerits system and license suspensions. All revenue will be derived from taxing the oligarchs, corporations ect and their profits as well as from assets owned in common by the people. And the Green fascists and Peter Reith can get stuffed.
|
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by Frances on Jun 6th, 2012 at 2:30pm
(double post)
|
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by Frances on Jun 6th, 2012 at 2:32pm Frances wrote on Jun 6th, 2012 at 2:30pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Swan confused over hypotheticals Post by adelcrow on Jun 6th, 2012 at 2:32pm
We should be called The Peoples Republic of Australia.
It has a nice ring to it :D |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |