Once upon a time, many years ago in a land far, far away, there lived the most powerful man in the world. He was Commander-in-Chief of the world's deadliest military force, and leader of the world's richest country. His name was Bill Clinton, President Clinton, POTUS to his bodyguards - the President Of The United States. Bill was a Big Man who smoked a Big Cigar, and like many Americans he was arrogant, conceited, foul-mouthed and an enthusiastic deviate.

One of his favourite amusements was to telephone senior officials and influential people from the most famous room in the nation - the Oval Office in the White House - whilst seated at his desk with his fly unzipped, enjoying fellatio lovingly administered by the horde of young interns who pandered to his every whim. When news of this peccadillo leaked out, many of those so treated were enraged, and there were loud calls for his impeachment. Such a blow to national pride was thought too damaging, but Dirty Bill was subpoenaed to the witness box under oath and required to testify.

Other than denying facts to which others had already attested, most of his statements were very simple, "I can't remember." The continuous repetition of this claim by the most powerful man in the world should give pause for serious consideration to every thoughtful person. Following his testimony, questions were raised as to the veracity of his convenient memory lapses, but Big Bill was on certain legal ground. During the hearing, he kept "chugging" diet cola from cans displayed prominently on the dock in front of him. Diet cola is loaded with aspartame, a neurotoxin whose main side-effect is memory loss in proportion to consumption. His medical team gleefully pointed out that anyone who had consumed as much aspartame as Bill obviously had would be lucky to remember what happened fifteen minutes ago, much less fifteen months. Bill got a slap on the wrist, was let off without penalty, and now earns huge speaking fess by touring countries like Australia, where he is greatly revered as a man's man, and an ideal role model for young boys.

So what's the point of this story, you may ask? Well, do you know what is the biggest selling product line in supermarkets all across Australia? Yep, you've got it! Coca-Cola beverages - Bill's Brew - large plastic bottles filled with corrosive industrial chemical concoctions containing known neurotoxins and carcinogens that Australians, young and old, swill by the bucket-load. It is usually accompanied by fatty industrial pseudo-foods containing processed meats loaded with veterinary antibiotics, hydrolyzed proteins, hydrogenated vegetable oils, endocrine disruptors, neurotoxins, carcinogens, and increasing quantities of genetically modified products - synthetic industrial organisms unknown in Nature, the effects of ingesting which are completely unknown.

Not only do Australians consume this toxic industrial waste, they feed it to their children, and then complain that they suffer from mood swings, irritability, excitability, rotting teeth, "attention deficits", poor digestion, immune deficiencies, and disfiguring obesities. They further insist that the cause of these ailments is a mystery, that they are undeserved and of no known origin. When the simple facts above are pointed out to them, they respond with ridicule, invective, denial and insults. Is it any wonder that most Australian kids are foul-mouthed little perverts by the time they reach puberty, and thereafter decline to a state worse even than their parents? Don't believe me? Just ask any high-school teacher.

I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP, even though such crass stupidity seems quite incredible.

Australia is a failed nation, and Australians are not just a failed race, but a biologically unviable species. Their territory is now being over-run by unwanted immigrants from every country on Earth, and they are powerless to stop it. The new-comers, as always, will take over within a generation, and the next generation of Australians will live in poverty in crime-ridden ghettos, whining bitterly that their parents have betrayed them. In this, at least, they will be correct.

So laugh it up and drink up, you arrogant, bloated, conceited fools. Bill's Brew is good for you!

My parents did not betray me, that is a lie - the Government and the corporate maggot did - they did this to native Australians no one else.

Yeah well. Me and my siblings werent even allowed to have cordial as kids. Mum said it was "downright dangerous". Now we are grown up we dont drink that coke crap either except occasionally as a mixer @ a social gathering where you cant get out of it.

I do not understand why aspartame is even legal.

SOB

did you know leaving a bottle of water in your car for a few hours turns it toxic and should never be drunk... plastic being what it is..

The Government and the corporate maggot did all of this to native Australians - and they made a lot of money out of it - now they want to further cement their destruction of native Australians by conning us to blame our own parents rather than where the blame lies - the corporate maggot and the Government who still to this day do all of these things to the Australian people for profit.

cods wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 8:16am:

did you know leaving a bottle of water in your car for a few hours turns it toxic and should never be drunk... plastic being what it is..

Did you know that all plastic bottles and containers have a code on them?

Good 1 and 2

ok  4 and 5

Bad 3, 6 and 7....never buy a product packed in a container with a code of 3, 6, 7.

> Did you know that all plastic bottles and containers have a code on them?

There's a fascinating article in Nexus Magazine (April-May 2012) about iodine: "... the deadliest aspect of these ubiquitous drinks ... isn't just the huge amounts of sugar, aspartame, and other dangerous chemicals they contain .. It's the bromine"

Basically, bromine (which is seldom mentioned in natural health literature) turns normally fluid and soluble oils into insoluble solids. You'll need to read the article for the full info, but many of those suffering obesity will surely see here the basic cause of the non-removable accumulations of tissue that are the basis of their condition.

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 8:39am:

cods wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:16am: did you know leaving a bottle of water in your car for a few hours turns it toxic and should never be drunk... plastic being what it is.. Did you know that all plastic bottles and containers have a code on them? Good 1 and 2 ok  4 and 5 Bad 3, 6 and 7....never buy a product packed in a container with a code of 3, 6, 7.

LOL

Because people alll over  the world are dying from plastic bottle poisioning.

:o

FriYAY wrote on May 22^nd, 2012 at 2:41pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:39am: cods wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:16am: did you know leaving a bottle of water in your car for a few hours turns it toxic and should never be drunk... plastic being what it is.. Did you know that all plastic bottles and containers have a code on them? Good 1 and 2 ok  4 and 5 Bad 3, 6 and 7....never buy a product packed in a container with a code of 3, 6, 7. LOL Because people alll over  the world are dying from plastic bottle poisioning. :o

there are no immediate or obvious effects so it must be ok

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 22^nd, 2012 at 2:45pm:

FriYAY wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 2:41pm: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:39am: cods wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:16am: did you know leaving a bottle of water in your car for a few hours turns it toxic and should never be drunk... plastic being what it is.. Did you know that all plastic bottles and containers have a code on them? Good 1 and 2 ok  4 and 5 Bad 3, 6 and 7....never buy a product packed in a container with a code of 3, 6, 7. LOL Because people alll over  the world are dying from plastic bottle poisioning. :o there are no immediate or obvious effects so it must be ok

If you say so.

Is there any proof out there?

Do you really think compainies would put a code on the "worst" type of bottle, thus admitting their complicity in all this?

FriYAY wrote on May 22^nd, 2012 at 2:53pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 2:45pm: FriYAY wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 2:41pm: Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:39am: cods wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:16am: did you know leaving a bottle of water in your car for a few hours turns it toxic and should never be drunk... plastic being what it is.. Did you know that all plastic bottles and containers have a code on them? Good 1 and 2 ok  4 and 5 Bad 3, 6 and 7....never buy a product packed in a container with a code of 3, 6, 7. LOL Because people alll over  the world are dying from plastic bottle poisioning. :o there are no immediate or obvious effects so it must be ok If you say so. Is there any proof out there? Do you really think compainies would put a code on the "worst" type of bottle, thus admitting their complicity in all this?

Proof of what?
Plastic bottles contain dangerous chemicals which can seep into the liquid it contains.

The code refers to what type of plastic the bottle is made from, some of which are bad but this is not the reason they are labeling it.. Its is so that people can recycle them in the appropriate manner.

yes humanity has awakened and this new awareness

is being downloaded by all

the one is the all and the all are the one

tread carefully dear ones

for he whom once was the lamb

is emerging now as

the lion...

the 2%ers/elite are to be confronted with an

awakened humanity

should be great viewing!

the universe continues to cheer you on!

stay tuned,for this is the greatest show on earth

namaste

-:)

As much as I disagree with you on some issues, I found your post amusing and enjoyable to read. It's a shame you had to convolute two very different issues.

In the 1990s Dr. Ralph Walden conducted a peer review of the 165 studies available at the time that were related to the safety of aspartame for humans. Of these, 74 were funded by corporations with financial ties to aspartame. All of the research that had financial ties to aspartame deemed it to be safe while 92% of the independent research indicated otherwise.

For those of you still drinking Bill's Brew, read Dr Walden's testimony to the Hawaii Health Committee re: Aspartame.

http://www.prlog.org/10050221-testimonial-ralph-walton-md-former-psychiatry-professor-to-hawaii-health-committee-re-aspartame.html

Numbers on bottles can also point to bottle identification codes and also the number of the mould that bottle came from.

>>>>

BPA – Bisphenol A

Used as a liner for many canned products and beverage bottles.

“….a 5kg baby would have to consume 80, 240ml bottles of infant formula a day, every day, over a life time, before reaching the safety limit of 50 micrograms/kilogram of body weight….”

Heinz and Campbell Soups have stopped using BPA, whilst many still choose to do so.

FSANZ and the FDA have both declared BPA safe due to the tiny amounts that are consumed, but continue to monitor any new developments.

Canada – Banned in drink bottles
Denmark – Banned in baby products
France – Total ban by 2014

>>>>

I recon these days as soon as someone can pump enough crap into a rat and kill it, that’s all some need to raise the hysterics alarm.

> All of the research that had financial ties to aspartame deemed it to be safe while 92% of the independent research indicated otherwise.

Whilst I'm glad to see practical information being posted here, there's a further caveat that is seldom mentioned, and essential to any real evaluation of risk. Almost all this type of research focuses on a single target substance in strictly controlled environments, and produces results that are only valid within those parameters. The human body is not only a complex biochemical environment, but a widely varying one, and potential real-world effects may vary widely from what experimental results may suggest. The body's defence mechanisms are also highly effective whilst health is maintained, but a gradual reduction in health can cross a threshold beyond which run-away effects lead to  severe complications, and these are often not attributed to the true cause if this has previously appeared benign.

> FSANZ and the FDA have both declared BPA safe due to the tiny amounts that are consumed

Of far greater concern, however, are the consequences of mixing different toxins and "safe" chemicals. BPA on its own may be safe below a certain limit, but in admixture with other substances can be far more damaging in ways that are unsuspected and untested. I read an unusual report some time ago by researchers who attempted to measure the effects of various admixtures of known toxins, an exceedingly complex and difficult task given the large number of variables and unknowns. Definite conclusions were difficult to deduce, but the authors expressed alarm at many of their initial findings, and published in the hope of attracting further funding for what they regarded as essential but unsupported research.

> 74 were funded by corporations with financial ties to aspartame.

Here's the real problem. If funding for single-substance research is biased and difficult to obtain, what chance is there of ANY company funding research into their own products in combination with those of their competitors. As I said in the post above, a simple soluble oil can be safe enough on its own, but even small amounts of bromine can change it into an insoluble deposit that, over time, can turn toxic or carcinogenic.

> I recon these days as soon as someone can pump enough crap into a rat and kill it, that’s all some need to raise the hysterics alarm.

And here's the most dangerous consequence of all; the creation of an army of "armchair experts" who draw puerile conclusions from a quick googling, not of data, but of popularized interpretations, most biased to suit one or another agenda.

The simple fact is that WE DO NOT KNOW what are the results of ingesting the crazy array of novel chemicals and biotics that are now entering the foodchain. It's caveat emptor with a whole new meaning - basically, "yer on yer own, mate."

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 8:39am:

cods wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:16am: did you know leaving a bottle of water in your car for a few hours turns it toxic and should never be drunk... plastic being what it is.. Did you know that all plastic bottles and containers have a code on them? Good 1 and 2 ok  4 and 5 Bad 3, 6 and 7....never buy a product packed in a container with a code of 3, 6, 7.

Checked two bottles of water at work today. Both had the recycling symbol, but no number.

LOL, listen to it.

Who does this? :-?
who draw puerile conclusions not of data, but of popularized interpretations, most biased to suit one or another agenda.

Oh it’s you!!! ::)
but in admixture with other substances can be far more damaging in ways that are unsuspected and untested

Do you have anything in fact or just puerile conclusions?

:-/

FriYAY wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 11:00am:

Do you have anything in fact or just puerile conclusions?

You could start with these if you're interested:

http://www.aaemonline.org/chemicalsensitivitypost.html

http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1524552

52midnight wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 11:48am:

FriYAY wrote on May 25th, 2012 at 11:00am: Do you have anything in fact or just puerile conclusions? You could start with these if you're interested: http://www.aaemonline.org/chemicalsensitivitypost.html http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1524552

A wishy-washy piece on environmental chemicals.

One on GM corn

One on toxic tort cases

Marvelous.

::)

> A wishy-washy piece on environmental chemicals.

http://www.aaemonline.org/chemicalsensitivitypost.html

The 90,000 chemicals commonly circulating in our modern world appear to be causing considerably more problems for humans than are typically recognized. Chemically sensitive persons, when reacting to even small chemical exposures, suffer with various symptoms that range in intensity from being unpleasant to being temporarily or even permanently disabling. Only too frequently this condition is unrecognized as it progressively leads to poor health, reduced activity, stressed social relationships and reduced job productivity.

Yes, well, you're obviously an Ozn - mindlessly aggressive, stupid, bigoted, and incapable of reading a page that doesn't have at least a dozen BlinkyBills on it.

Just like our politicians, in fact. They really do represent the majority of Ozns. "A nation gets the leaders it deserves."

Go back to Facebook - you'll be much more at home.

52midnight wrote on May 25^th, 2012 at 1:16pm:

> A wishy-washy piece on environmental chemicals. http://www.aaemonline.org/chemicalsensitivitypost.html The 90,000 chemicals commonly circulating in our modern world appear to be causing considerably more problems for humans than are typically recognized. Chemically sensitive persons, when reacting to even small chemical exposures, suffer with various symptoms that range in intensity from being unpleasant to being temporarily or even permanently disabling. Only too frequently this condition is unrecognized as it progressively leads to poor health, reduced activity, stressed social relationships and reduced job productivity. Yes, well, you're obviously an Ozn - mindlessly aggressive, stupid, bigoted, and incapable of reading a page that doesn't have at least a dozen BlinkyBills on it. Just like our politicians, in fact. They really do represent the majority of Ozns. "A nation gets the leaders it deserves." Go back to Facebook - you'll be much more at home.

LOL

What an angry little rant Ozn! Grrrrrrr >:(

"appear to be causing"

Ozn proof... ;D

52midnight wrote on May 21^st, 2012 at 7:56am:

Australia is a failed nation, and Australians are not just a failed race, but a biologically unviable species. Their territory is now being over-run by unwanted immigrants from every country on Earth, and they are powerless to stop it. The new-comers, as always, will take over within a generation, and the next generation of Australians will live in poverty in crime-ridden ghettos ...

Have you and corporate_whitey considered getting "hitched" ?

Look up ad hominem if either of you know how to use a dictionary. The ten year-olds have obviously taken over here, so I'll call it quits.