| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> childless pollie poes with baby http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336964742 Message started by Sprintcyclist on May 14th, 2012 at 1:05pm |
|
|
Title: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Sprintcyclist on May 14th, 2012 at 1:05pm aaaawwwwww, how fake is that ? |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by adelcrow on May 14th, 2012 at 1:17pm
How dare anyone without kids be seen holding a baby...it criminal and there should be a royal commission.
|
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Frances on May 14th, 2012 at 1:20pm Sprintcyclist wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:05pm:
So, are you taking your inspration for this thread from Mark Latham or Bill Heffernan? |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Gist on May 14th, 2012 at 1:21pm Sprintcyclist wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:05pm:
Wow, you really are getting desperate aren't you? |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by adelcrow on May 14th, 2012 at 1:24pm Gist wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:21pm:
We all know Julia is evil and hates children, pensioners, the rich, the middle class, blue and white collar workers in fact she hates everyone and everything so it must be a fake smile |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Sprintcyclist on May 14th, 2012 at 1:25pm adelcrow wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:17pm:
I think rudd had one going |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Deathridesahorse on May 14th, 2012 at 1:28pm
IF I WAS OLD SCHOOL LIBERAL(AS IN, FROM THE FARM TYPE !!) I WOULD HATE HER FOR NOT BEING A CHRISTIAN!!
THAT'S RIGHT, HATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-[ :-[ :-[ |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Annie Anthrax on May 14th, 2012 at 1:32pm
She looks comfortable and happy, Sprint. What's the big deal?
|
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by adelcrow on May 14th, 2012 at 1:33pm Annie Anthrax wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:32pm:
The big deal is that she...looks comfortable and happy |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Andrei.Hicks on May 14th, 2012 at 1:41pm Annie Anthrax wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:32pm:
It's easy to look happy when you know you're handing the baby back. She wouldn't know what family life was like if it smacked her on the head. She chose her career above family. |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by adelcrow on May 14th, 2012 at 1:44pm Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:41pm:
As do a growing number of men and women. |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Annie Anthrax on May 14th, 2012 at 1:48pm adelcrow wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:33pm:
She almost looks...feminine and natural. What next? Abbott could discover boardies. |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Annie Anthrax on May 14th, 2012 at 1:49pm Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:41pm:
The same can be said for a lot of people. It's an issue here only because she's a woman. |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Andrei.Hicks on May 14th, 2012 at 1:51pm adelcrow wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:44pm:
But do those same people turn around and tell others how they understand the pressures the family are under? My issue is not that she chose a career above a family, it is the fact she tries to lecture the rest of us on something she knows nothing about. Say what you like about Abbott - he has raised a family and had children. She has not and has no idea what it is like. |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Andrei.Hicks on May 14th, 2012 at 1:51pm Annie Anthrax wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:49pm:
There is probably something in that, but that's how it is. |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by The tolerator on May 14th, 2012 at 1:53pm
Who in their right mind would let any of those ghouls from parliament touch their child? Only reason I'd even consider it is if they had a load of poo in their pants at the time....or maybe some kind of highly communicable disease.
|
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by FriYAY on May 14th, 2012 at 2:03pm Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:51pm:
Bollocks. Crap thread, belongs on the crap heap. :-X |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Deathridesahorse on May 14th, 2012 at 2:05pm adelcrow wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:44pm:
ANDREI IS OLD SCHOOL: WHERE SLAVES TO WAR GO TO WAR AND WOMEN AREN'T FREE TO DO WHAT THEY WANT!! ANDREI CAN'T SEE THAT 9-11 TOLD US ALL THAT THE WORLD TURNS AND THINKS WE SOMEHOW STILL FALL FOR THE ASSUMED AUTHORITY TICK!! HEY ANDREI, no one listens to the 1950s managerial-type idiots anymore as they pushed the buttons that led to 9-11!! The world laughs at your Nuclear-tipped impotence I'm sorry to say pal!! |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by corporate_whitey on May 14th, 2012 at 2:11pm
Julia Gillard disrespects my culture and traditions and insults my ancestors and brings invasion to my country - why wont she go back where she came from?
|
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by Uncle Meat on May 14th, 2012 at 2:58pm Sprintcyclist wrote on May 14th, 2012 at 1:05pm:
Ask this guy: |
|
Title: Re: childless pollie poes with baby Post by corporate_whitey on May 14th, 2012 at 3:25pm
The invader Government spent 370,000 on a study that was never undertaken to try to suggest that centenary cultural celebrations of my ANZAC ancestors might offend illegal invaders of my country. The obvious conclusion they are drawing is that the meaning and significance of the day needs to be re-engineered to suit the invaders. They did not blush while they said this and were not ashamed to waste 370,000 dollars on this study. Banning culture is part of invasion. 8-)
|
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |