Australian Politics Forum

Residents of Melbourne are disgusted that “nasty, discriminating hatemail” has arrived unsolicited into their mailboxes this week.

The ‘10 Reasons Why homosexual ‘marriage’ is harmful and should be opposed’ pamphlet is courtesy of Catholic group Australian TFP and their new campaign Defending Natural Marriage.

Included among the ‘reasons’ the leaflet details are a number of anti-gay slurs designed to vilify homosexuals as sinful and unnatural.

The fear-mongering ‘slippery slope’ argument has rarely been as nakedly employed as it is here. Quote: “If homosexual ‘marriage’ is universally accepted as the present step in sexual ‘freedom’, what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior?”

It is not known how many properties have received the leaflet this week.

“It’s just wrong that they do a letter drop,” says a concerned Melbourne resident who shared it on Facebook today, prompting several shocked reactions.

“I’m not gay, however my housemate is, and so are many friends of mine,” he tells Same Same. “I have no issue with the church being opposed to gay marriage, it’s a religious ceremony. But do go to these lengths, and to basically go into letterboxes saying how wrong it is to be ‘gay’ is just unfair.”

“Disgusting, discriminating junkmail,” comments about the pamphlet on his Facebook page summed up. “It’s thoughtless nonsense like this that divides society.”

The full text of the pamphlet is shown below.

1. It Is Not Marriage

Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and wellbeing of the spouses.

The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarily in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.

Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing.

2. It Violates Natural Law

Marriage is not just any relationship between human beings. It is a relationship rooted in human nature and thus governed by natural law.

Natural law’s most elementary precept is that “good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided.” By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him. Thus, he can know the end or purpose of each of his acts and how it is morally wrong to transform the means that help him accomplish an act into the act’s purpose.

Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.

Being rooted in human nature, natural law is universal and immutable. It applies to the entire human race, equally. It commands and forbids consistently, everywhere and always. Saint Paul taught in the Epistle to the Romans that the natural law is inscribed on the heart of every man. (Rom. 2:14-15)

3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother

It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.

The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model.

Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.

4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle

In the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants.

Civil laws are structuring principles of man’s life in society. As such, they play a very important and sometimes decisive role in influencing patterns of thought and behavior. They externally shape the life of society, but also profoundly modify everyone’s perception and evaluation of forms of behavior.

Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.

5. It Turns a Moral Wrong into a Civil Right

Homosexual activists argue that same-sex “marriage” is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for racial equality in the 1960s.

This is false.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these differences are insurmountable obstacles to marriage. The two individuals are still man and woman, and thus the requirements of nature are respected.

Same-sex “marriage” opposes nature. Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological impossibility.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the “marriage” between two individuals of the same sex.

6. It Does Not Create a Family but a Naturally Sterile Union

Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. It naturally tends to create families.

On the contrary, same-sex “marriage” is intrinsically sterile. If the “spouses” want a child, they must circumvent nature by costly and artificial means or employ surrogates. The natural tendency of such a union is not to create families.
Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage.

7. It Defeats the State’s Purpose of Benefiting Marriage

One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual affection of the parents. This aids in perpetuating the nation and strengthening society, an evident interest of the State.

Homosexual “marriage” does not provide such conditions. Its primary purpose, objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.

8. It Imposes Its Acceptance on All Society

By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval.

In the private sphere, objecting parents will see their children exposed more than ever to this new “morality,” businesses offering wedding services will be forced to provide them for same-sex unions, and rental property owners will have to agree to accept same-sex couples as tenants.

In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack on the natural order and Christian morality.

9. It Is the Cutting Edge of the Sexual Revolution

In the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex “marriage.”

If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior? Indeed, radical elements of certain “avant garde” subcultures are already advocating such aberrations.

The railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the Chicago Free Press:

“The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people’s view of homosexuality.”

10. It Offends God

This is the most important reason. Whenever one violates the natural moral order established by God, one sins and offends God. Same-sex “marriage” does just this. Accordingly, anyone who professes to love God must be opposed to it.

Marriage is not the creature of any State. Rather, it was established by God in Paradise for our first parents, Adam and Eve. As we read in the Book of Genesis: “God created man in His image; in the Divine image he created him; male and female He created them. God blessed them, saying: ‘Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it.’” (Gen. 1:28-29)

The same was taught by Our Savior Jesus Christ: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife.” (Mark 10:6-7).

Genesis also teaches how God punished Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of homosexuality: “The Lord rained down sulphurous fire upon Sodom and Gomorrah. He overthrew those cities and the whole Plain, together with the inhabitants of the cities and the produce of the soil.” (Gen. 19:24-25)

I think you will find its the Homosexuals who are being Hetrophobic.

Just a heads up. I dont read those posts with the big fonts.

SOB

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:43am:

Just a heads up. I dont read those posts with the big fonts.

SOB

That's nice. Then why post?

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

It's a shame the catholic cult don't use the money to feed the poor.

Evil hypocrites!

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

No, I have not swapped anything. I do not support gay marriage. I support gay union.

To be equal, gays need their own institution called unions.

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:46am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:43am:

Just a heads up. I dont read those posts with the big fonts.

SOB

That's nice. Then why post?

What has posting elsewhere got to do with it? Or do you mean why post this message? Well I was hoping you would show some consideration but I know you wont.

SOB

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

No, I have not swapped anything. I do not support gay marriage. I support gay union.

Same Same

Marriage is just a world ... a word homophobics want to use to make them feel their relationship is superior to all other relationships, including de-facto relationships.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:54am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:46am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:43am:

Just a heads up. I dont read those posts with the big fonts.

SOB

That's nice. Then why post?

What has posting elsewhere got to do with it? Or do you mean why post this message? Well I was hoping you would show some consideration but I know you wont.

SOB

Here is the link, read it from the site.

I usually include links yet ran out of room.

http://www.samesame.com.au/news/local/8396/Anti-gay-hatemail-hits-Melbourne-streets.htm

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:55am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

No, I have not swapped anything. I do not support gay marriage. I support gay union.

Same Same

Marriage is just a world ... a word homophobics want to use to make them feel their relationship is superior to all other relationships, including de-facto relationships.

Not the same at all but equal in what they try to achieve.

If they were the same, then why do you want marriage.

Amazing!! Newsflash to the Catholic Church - Gays are out there living in the community. Some are already living together in long term relationships. Some are already parents. Some have already travelled to another country to get married. The world has not ended.

The Catholic Church would be better served by cleaning up their own mud filled backyard before muckracking another group in our society.

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:59am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:55am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

No, I have not swapped anything. I do not support gay marriage. I support gay union.

Same Same

Marriage is just a world ... a word homophobics want to use to make them feel their relationship is superior to all other relationships, including de-facto relationships.

Not the same at all but equal in what they try to achieve.

If they were the same, then why do you want marriage.

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:07am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:59am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:55am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

No, I have not swapped anything. I do not support gay marriage. I support gay union.

Same Same

Marriage is just a world ... a word homophobics want to use to make them feel their relationship is superior to all other relationships, including de-facto relationships.

Not the same at all but equal in what they try to achieve.

If they were the same, then why do you want marriage.

Marriage equates to equality within a secular society.

Between a man and a woman yes.

Unions equates to equality for a confused gay society.

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:08am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:07am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:59am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:55am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

No, I have not swapped anything. I do not support gay marriage. I support gay union.

Same Same

Marriage is just a world ... a word homophobics want to use to make them feel their relationship is superior to all other relationships, including de-facto relationships.

Not the same at all but equal in what they try to achieve.

If they were the same, then why do you want marriage.

Marriage equates to equality within a secular society.

Between a man and a woman yes.

Between two people without any reference with genitalia

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:10am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:08am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:07am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:59am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:55am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

No, I have not swapped anything. I do not support gay marriage. I support gay union.

Same Same

Marriage is just a world ... a word homophobics want to use to make them feel their relationship is superior to all other relationships, including de-facto relationships.

Not the same at all but equal in what they try to achieve.

If they were the same, then why do you want marriage.

Marriage equates to equality within a secular society.

Between a man and a woman yes.

Between two people without any reference with genitalia

No, that is what unions are for. For the expression of love. Marriage is for the expression of love and creation.

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:13am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:10am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:08am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:07am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:59am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:55am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:53am:

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:47am:

progressiveslol wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Thanks for handing out that pamphlet, otherwise I would never had received it.

It speaks the truth however uncomfortable that may be for a gay person hoping for gay marriage.

You supported equality ... and then after reading this thread, you swapped camp?

No, I have not swapped anything. I do not support gay marriage. I support gay union.

Same Same

Marriage is just a world ... a word homophobics want to use to make them feel their relationship is superior to all other relationships, including de-facto relationships.

Not the same at all but equal in what they try to achieve.

If they were the same, then why do you want marriage.

Marriage equates to equality within a secular society.

Between a man and a woman yes.

Between two people without any reference with genitalia

No, that is what unions are for. For the expression of love. Marriage is for the expression of love and creation.

Same sex couples do have the ability to have children as part of their family.

If creation is an important part, why are there no tests to weed out barren opposite sex couples before marriage?

Thanks green

Geez. Australia cant even make its own hatemail. Its recycled yank crap!

Quote:

The railroading of same-sex “marriage” on the American people makes increasingly clear what homosexual activist Paul Varnell wrote in the Chicago Free Press:

“The gay movement, whether we acknowledge it or not, is not a civil rights movement, not even a sexual liberation movement, but a moral revolution aimed at changing people’s view of homosexuality.”

I bet it was a yank hate group that organised this too. I bet.

SOB

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:10am:

Between two people without any reference with genitalia

That's right!! Nowhere does it actually SAY that you need two legs to play Tarzan. Same argument goes for gay marriage. But it is just as ridiculous as a one legged Tarzan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty68LPKRQQQ

What next?
Will married sodomites demand the right to breastfeed their adopted kids?

Maybe he's yearning to grow breasts?

He's probably just a lactophiliac.

It fits.

You could be right.

Here Soren, try one of these:

Strangely disturbing on many levels but ... hey, what you get up to in the privacy of your own home is your business.

Annie Anthrax wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 9:40am:

Pervert.

It is on the front cover of Time Magazine's 21 May 1012 edition. It is NOT a hoax.

http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20120521,00.html

The Greens, the Government and the Corporate Maggots say invaders who they call skilled migrants have more right to my country than natives and are more valuable to the economy because they don't require training...thats terra nullis...no mans land... 8-)

I know it's not a hoax. I am familiar with attachment parenting and the controversy surrounding it.

Did you raid your personal collection for it?

Soren wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 9:28am:

What next?
Will married sodomites demand the right to breastfeed their adopted kids?

Is she a pedo? Is there a wet spot. Maybe that is why she is wearing black.

Soren obviously didnt like the subject being discussed so changed it.

SOB

This would be some bright idea from the Homosexual lobby to engineer more mommas boys. ::) :P

Annie Anthrax wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 10:24am:

I know it's not a hoax. I am familiar with attachment parenting and the controversy surrounding it.

Did you raid your personal collection for it?

How the bugger* could next week's TIME cover be in my collection, dozy bint?

Annie Anthrax wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 10:24am:

I know it's not a hoax. I am familiar with attachment parenting and the controversy surrounding it.

Did you raid your personal collection for it?

It's not ideal in my mind but its her choice to do this.
I don't see what it has to do with anyone else.

Soren wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 12:26pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 10:24am:

I know it's not a hoax. I am familiar with attachment parenting and the controversy surrounding it.

Did you raid your personal collection for it?

How the bugger* could next week's TIME cover be in my collection, dozy bint?

Perhaps that's something we should be asking you.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 3:15pm:

Annie Anthrax wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 10:24am:

I know it's not a hoax. I am familiar with attachment parenting and the controversy surrounding it.

Did you raid your personal collection for it?

It's not ideal in my mind but its her choice to do this.
I don't see what it has to do with anyone else.

But what are we going to do if Elton John's wife also wants to suckle his kid well into primary school??. Are we gonna discriminate against him on the grounds that he is a bloke and say *gulp*, "sorry Davo, I mean Mrs John, you can't do that"?
Isn't that homophobic to discriminate between what homos and heteros can do? It's all socially constructed so they should be able to do what heteros do, no?

Soren you seem to have a lot to prove.
People comfortable with their own sexuality don't need to critisize others for theirs.
Grow up you closet homo

Have you ordered the cow outfit yet Soren? It could make you look smarter, as well as make you attractive to stud bulls. There's really no downside for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TEYa4NbPYc

Should the David Furnises of this world demand equality?

Homosexuality being no different from heterosexuality is a notion accepted only by morons. And by morons I mean the psychiatric use of the word, those with the mental acuity of 8-12 year olds.

It takes a moron, for example, to say that I am a homo for pointing out that only morons will equate homosexuality with heterosexuality. It is really the tactic of 8-12 year olds. i

Gist wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:35pm:

Have you ordered the cow outfit yet Soren? It could make you look smarter, as well as make you attractive to stud bulls. There's really no downside for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1fOQkz3c6c

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:26pm:

Gist wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:35pm:

Have you ordered the cow outfit yet Soren? It could make you look smarter, as well as make you attractive to stud bulls. There's really no downside for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1fOQkz3c6c

Stop wanking. It's gay.

Soren wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:39pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:26pm:

Gist wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:35pm:

Have you ordered the cow outfit yet Soren? It could make you look smarter, as well as make you attractive to stud bulls. There's really no downside for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1fOQkz3c6c

Stop wanking. It's gay.

Its not wanking when its you mums asshole doing all the work

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:42pm:

Soren wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:39pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:26pm:

Gist wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:35pm:

Have you ordered the cow outfit yet Soren? It could make you look smarter, as well as make you attractive to stud bulls. There's really no downside for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1fOQkz3c6c

Stop wanking. It's gay.

Its not wanking when its you mums asshole doing all the work

;D

You ARE a smacking 10 year old!! And I was only joshing!

Leviticus 20:13

Quote:

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination:
they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

A Catholic hate group is letter box dropping their bile. I wish I could say I'm surprised. This is the quality of people that are living amongst us, and it's laughable that these people think their antiquated views are still relevant to anyone.

Religion: F*ckhead magnets.

GoddyofOz wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:41am:

Pretty much the same for giai nuts and catastrophic climate change religion.

Who are all of these people invading my country, banning my culture, killing my people and disrespecting my ancestors?
8-)

progressiveslol wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:53am:

GoddyofOz wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:41am:

Pretty much the same for giai nuts and catastrophic climate change religion.

What on earth is a giai nut? Is it like a candle nut? I see that as an ingredient in lots of foods but I've never seen one. I guess it's affected by climate change in some way??

Justice Micahel Kirby opposed gay marriage. is he homophobic?

Soren wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 9:16pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:42pm:

Soren wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:39pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:26pm:

Gist wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:35pm:

Have you ordered the cow outfit yet Soren? It could make you look smarter, as well as make you attractive to stud bulls. There's really no downside for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1fOQkz3c6c

Stop wanking. It's gay.

Its not wanking when its you mums asshole doing all the work

;D

You ARE a smacking 10 year old!! And I was only joshing!

Is that how 10yr olds in your private school speak?

The mob behind this are entitled to their opinion, they are even entitled to spread their message.

In my opinion all it does is strengthen peoples existing opinions.

It does nothing to sway peoples

It is stupid and dishonest to label opposition to gay marriage homophobic.

If homos can agaitate for gay marriage, those who are against it are entitled to agitate against it.

Annie Anthrax wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 10:00am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:42pm:

Its not wanking when its you mums asshole doing all the work

Is that how 10yr olds in your private school speak?

He's obviously from a sink school, with a 'troubled family background' as they say.

@Greens

What exactly is "homophobic" and how does it reflect the issue about "equality"

If you are going to demonise people with name calling then you should be able to explain what it means

JEWISH CONSPIRACY TO PUSH BLACK CULTURE AND GAY LIFESTYLES!!

gAY LIFE IS ANTI-LIFE!

Biology made the bum mucky for a purpose!

Diseases down that way!!

I dare anyone to ask a micro-biologist about gay marriage!!!

*** IT WON'T HAPPEN!! ***

Maqqa wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

@Greens

What exactly is "homophobic" and how does it reflect the issue about "equality"

If you are going to demonise people with name calling then you should be able to explain what it means

Sorry mister, don't have the inclination to spoon feed.

Google will though :

https://www.google.com.au/

Maqqa wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

@Greens

What exactly is "homophobic" and how does it reflect the issue about "equality"

If you are going to demonise people with name calling then you should be able to explain what it means

Homophobic:
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Link

SOB

There's a lot of people invading my country and making a toilet of my culture, banning our traditions, forcing their ways on us, stealing our assets and resources and pushing my people off their land. While these strangers are doing all this they are claiming that they are victims of injustice...

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:38pm:

:-?

I support equal treatment for equal things, and by extension, inequal treatment for inequal things.

But since homosexual unions are clearly not equal to heterosexual relationships/marriage, giving them equal consideration is an example of inequality in action.

As the tolerator, I have been sent back from the future to fight inequality in all it's forms, and that is why I can not support homosexual "marriage".

The colonial powers invading my country all seem to be so racist and sexually perverted and they all say they are fighting for equality while they push us off our native lands and disrespect our customs and ancestors...

Bobby. wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 9:34pm:

Leviticus 20:13

Quote:

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination:
they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Bobbie, stop being a prick tease. You know Soren's still sore from the surgery.

Paki gob on a stick wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 1:25pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 9:34pm:

Leviticus 20:13

Quote:

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination:
they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Bobbie, stop being a prick tease. You know Soren's still sore from the surgery.

So according to the bible its ok to root anyone and anything as long as its not in the missionary position.
Personally its been a long time since my sex life was that boring ;D
Listen to me and the bible people.. no sex while your lying down :P

... wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

Yes you were sent back from the future, and succeeded to reverse the trend ... then they sent me to reverse your reversal.

Now that has been achieved, we are back on course for the natural evolution of humanity via equality.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:41pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

@Greens

What exactly is "homophobic" and how does it reflect the issue about "equality"

If you are going to demonise people with name calling then you should be able to explain what it means

Homophobic:
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Link

SOB

Since Green is too stupid to even understand what it means - then lets look at your definition.

lets look at the two key words - irrational fear and discrimination.

Can the Greens show/prove that there are irrational fear and discrimination in the mind set of those who simply do not agree with same sex marriage?

Just because you don't agree with something that does not makes you a homophobic

SOB

... wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

This week you call yourself the tolerator, Wesley. Last week it was RompsWithDonkeysMan wasn't it?

No gist. ::)

just...no.

____ wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 3:13pm:

... wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

Why do you oppose equality greens?

Maqqa wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 3:20pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:41pm:

Maqqa wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:04pm:

@Greens

What exactly is "homophobic" and how does it reflect the issue about "equality"

If you are going to demonise people with name calling then you should be able to explain what it means

Homophobic:
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals

Link

SOB

Since Green is too stupid to even understand what it means - then lets look at your definition.

lets look at the two key words - irrational fear and discrimination.

Three Words

D'Oh

Can the Greens show/prove that there are irrational fear and discrimination in the mind set of those who simply do not agree with same sex marriage?

Opening Post

Just because you don't agree with something that does not makes you a homophobic

Unless Irrational Fear and Discrimination is the reason for the opposition to equality.

SOB

So off you go and read the original post of this thread

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 12:38pm:

:-?

:-? :-?

I like the Tolerator. It's a nice name.

Although I thought Honky made more sense.

... wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 3:24pm:

____ wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 3:13pm:

... wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

Why do you oppose equality greens?

Because your version of equality is a small version of equality.

Humanity is better than you think they are.

____ wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 3:24pm:

____ wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 3:13pm:

... wrote on May 14^th, 2012 at 1:04pm:

Why do you oppose equality greens?

Because your version of equality is a small version of equality.

Humanity is better than you think they are.

That's not an answer. If you won't answer that, what if I phrase it liiiiike....

Why do you promote inequality?

Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Homophobic Reasons To Oppose Equality http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336858697 Message started by Greens_Win on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:38am