Gay unions a 'risk to kids', claims Victoria's deputy chief psychiatrist

doctors lobbying the Federal Government to ban same-sex marriage.

Professor Kuravilla George, who is Victoria's deputy chief psychiatrist and the State Government's equal opportunities champion, claims that gay marriage poses a health risk to society.

In a letter to the Senate's inquiry into marriage equality, the group of doctors wrote that it was "important for the future health of our nation" to retain the definition of marriage as being between a man and woman.

"We submit the evidence is clear that children who grow up in a family with a mother and father do better in all parameters than children without," they wrote.

News of the letter, revealed in today's Sunday Herald Sun, follows Attorney-General Nicola Roxon's announcement yesterday that she would vote for gay marriage when the chance came later this year.

Ms Roxon was speaking as thousands of Australians held protest marches across the country calling on Ms Gillard to change her stance after US President Barack Obama said that same sex couples should be able to wed.

Australia passed an amendment to its laws in 2004 explicitly defining marriage as between a man and woman, but there are several bills before the parliament calling for the right to be extended to same-sex couples.

I don't see homosexuals caring to much about the mental health of children.

Do you support children remaining in single parent homes BR?


Should these kids be taken from these homes, and placed in two parent homes so to protect the children's mental health?

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:14am:

Do you support children remaining in single parent homes BR? Should these kids be taken from these homes, and placed in two parent homes so to protect the children's mental health?

Most Single parent households still allow the child to visit the other parent. so your argument has no grounds and its not just the seeing both parents factor it also has to do with what a normal family environment is, many single parents often seek a new partner in their life so the child has both male and female role models in their lives.

Lefties are telling us we should listen to the scientists because you would listen to your doctors.

Well, now is your chance to back up your claims lol funny how words go in round-abouts.

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:14am:

Do you support children remaining in single parent homes BR? Should these kids be taken from these homes, and placed in two parent homes so to protect the children's mental health?

but as expected i didn't think a greeny would think of the children. Homosexuality is turning out to have more and more to do with ones selfish needs.

Ohh the religous ppl are so scared of gays. Scared they will somehow "catch" it i suppose. Want to control other ppls lives.

SOB

Children where one parent has dies
Children born of surrogate mothers
Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment)

Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home?




BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:23am:

____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:14am: Do you support children remaining in single parent homes BR? Should these kids be taken from these homes, and placed in two parent homes so to protect the children's mental health? Most Single parent households still allow the child to visit the other parent. so your argument has no grounds and its not just the seeing both parents factor it also has to do with what a normal family environment is, many single parents often seek a new partner in their life so the child has both male and female role models in their lives.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:27am:

Ohh the religous ppl are so scared of gays. Scared they will somehow "catch" it i suppose. Want to control other ppls lives. SOB

Dont you believe in mann-made climate change. Listen to your doctors.

____ wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:28am:

Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home?

Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children.
Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life.

I've always thought that kids shouldn't be part of a gay union where they have to adopt - in other words "trophy kids". It totally stumps me why two men should want to adopt a baby anyway.

http://www.usmagazine.com/uploads/assets/articles/38245-meet-elton-john-and-david-furnishs-baby-boy/1295294410_elton-furnish-290.jpg

I think that kid has a fair chance of developing a dysfunctional personality.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:33am:

____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life.

SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:43am:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB

Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:27am:

Ohh the religous ppl are so scared of gays. Scared they will somehow "catch" it i suppose. Want to control other ppls lives. SOB

Not just religious people, and "scared" is the wrong term.

I'm anything but "scared". Bemused perhaps, suspicious perhaps and probably prejudiced too to be frank, but not scared. I don't have a problem with any two people living together regardless of gender. The issue of "marriage" is irrelevant in Australia where de facto's outnumber married couples, and de facto relationships have the same legal privileges. (and same sex defacto relationships are already possible).

My only area of objection relates to gay adoption, where a gay union is regarded as just as good as a heterosexual union. It clearly is not (all other things being equal) 

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner.

Then maybe you should get out more.  I have many friends that are single parents and have chosen to stay single for lots of reasons.  Some have had bad experiences, some just don't want to disrupt their kids lives with a string of "strangers" coming and going.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:33am:

____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life.

Gay people don't have same sex families ... they have members of both sexes as siblings, parents, grandparents, and so on.

You don't have to be rooting someone to have them influence the children.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner.

Hahahha. So because no-one you know doesnt then everyone doesnt? My mother didnt. My sister doesnt. In fact no-one i know does! So its personal experience vs personal experience. Guess I win though because I didnt generalise.

SOB

muso wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:50am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:27am: Ohh the religous ppl are so scared of gays. Scared they will somehow "catch" it i suppose. Want to control other ppls lives. SOB Not just religious people, and "scared" is the wrong term. I'm anything but "scared". Bemused perhaps, suspicious perhaps and probably prejudiced too to be frank, but not scared. I don't have a problem with any two people living together regardless of gender. The issue of "marriage" is irrelevant in Australia where de facto's outnumber married couples, and de facto relationships have the same legal privileges. (and same sex defacto relationships are already possible). My only area of objection relates to gay adoption, where a gay union is regarded as just as good as a heterosexual union. It clearly is not (all other things being equal)

No not just the religious ppl. I was talking about the religious ppl though.

I actually know a gay couple who raised several kids. Their husbands died or something and they got together even though both of them already had kids. The kids are grown up and hetero and fine although a lot more tolerant then most.

SOB

So who are the Doctors for the Family?

Doctors for the Family was established in November 2011.


Its convenor is Dr Lachlan Dunjey.


Dr Dunjey is a Perth GP and a right-to-life campaigner who has run as a Senate candidate for the Christian Democratic Party in multiple elections.


He was president of Baptist Churches of WA in 1989/90.


Dr Dunjey set up Medicine With Morality in 2006 to lobby politicians on issues including cloning and euthanasia.

Doctors for the Family says it aims to "highlight the health aspects of marriage and family and ensure a healthy future for our children".


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-13/doctors-for-the-family-heterosexual-marriage/4009740

I have always been more the middle road on this subject.

Between the Religious Right who want all gay unions banned and the more Extremist gay lobby who scream for them to have all and sundry.

My view is that gay people should have their relationship recognized in a union.
For them to enjoy the same rights as a long term de-facto couple.
For them to be able to register their relationship or union if they so wish.

But for 'marriage' to remain as a union between a man and a woman.

I think that's a pretty non-confrontational, acceptable view.

It is the gay lobby who scream and yell for everything that are not coming to the party on this one.

The Greens, the ALP and the CIA are trying to destroy our families to weaken our resistance so they can invade us and take our country with all of their teeming victims of injustice around the globe.... :P

I personally though am not comfortable with a gay couple having children.

I think it is morally wrong and is not good for the child.

It's unfair to bring them into that world.

If people want to be gay, then fine. I am perfectly ok for them to be - but leave children out of it and to make up their own minds.

buzzanddidj wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 1:46pm:

So who are the Doctors for the Family? Doctors for the Family was established in November 2011. Its convenor is Dr Lachlan Dunjey. Dr Dunjey is a Perth GP and a right-to-life campaigner who has run as a Senate candidate for the Christian Democratic Party in multiple elections. He was president of Baptist Churches of WA in 1989/90. Dr Dunjey set up Medicine With Morality in 2006 to lobby politicians on issues including cloning and euthanasia. Doctors for the Family says it aims to "highlight the health aspects of marriage and family and ensure a healthy future for our children". http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-13/doctors-for-the-family-heterosexual-marriage/4009740

So?

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 7:45am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner.

Well, they're certainly out there.

I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner.

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 1:54pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:45am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. Well, they're certainly out there. I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner.

Bollocks.
I know plenty of single guys and girls who would say "I am not looking".

Crock of sh*t man, they would take another partner if offered.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13^th, 2012 at 8:00am:

muso wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:50am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:27am: Ohh the religous ppl are so scared of gays. Scared they will somehow "catch" it i suppose. Want to control other ppls lives. SOB Not just religious people, and "scared" is the wrong term. I'm anything but "scared". Bemused perhaps, suspicious perhaps and probably prejudiced too to be frank, but not scared. I don't have a problem with any two people living together regardless of gender. The issue of "marriage" is irrelevant in Australia where de facto's outnumber married couples, and de facto relationships have the same legal privileges. (and same sex defacto relationships are already possible). My only area of objection relates to gay adoption, where a gay union is regarded as just as good as a heterosexual union. It clearly is not (all other things being equal)  No not just the religious ppl. I was talking about the religious ppl though. I actually know a gay couple who raised several kids. Their husbands died or something and they got together even though both of them already had kids. The kids are grown up and hetero and fine although a lot more tolerant then most. SOB

I wouldn't have a problem with that. My issue is with two gay men who adopt a "trophy" child who is unrelated to either. That's where I'd have concerns. I can't explain why. It just seems wrong to me.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 1:58pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:54pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:45am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. Well, they're certainly out there. I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner. Bollocks.

No, it's a fact actually.

I know several single parents who have remained single for many years.

muso wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 1:59pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 8:00am: muso wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:50am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:27am: Ohh the religous ppl are so scared of gays. Scared they will somehow "catch" it i suppose. Want to control other ppls lives. SOB Not just religious people, and "scared" is the wrong term. I'm anything but "scared". Bemused perhaps, suspicious perhaps and probably prejudiced too to be frank, but not scared. I don't have a problem with any two people living together regardless of gender. The issue of "marriage" is irrelevant in Australia where de facto's outnumber married couples, and de facto relationships have the same legal privileges. (and same sex defacto relationships are already possible). My only area of objection relates to gay adoption, where a gay union is regarded as just as good as a heterosexual union. It clearly is not (all other things being equal)  No not just the religious ppl. I was talking about the religious ppl though. I actually know a gay couple who raised several kids. Their husbands died or something and they got together even though both of them already had kids. The kids are grown up and hetero and fine although a lot more tolerant then most. SOB I wouldn't have a problem with that. My issue is with two gay men who adopt a "trophy" child who is unrelated to either. That's where I'd have concerns. I can't explain why. It just seems wrong to me.

"Here's one of my parents, Dad and Dad...."

---

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:00pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:58pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:54pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:45am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. Well, they're certainly out there. I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner. Bollocks. No, it's a fact actually. I know several single parents who have remained single for many years.

But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:04pm:

"Here's one of my parents, Dad and Dad...."

It's almost inevitable that any parents will be embarassing  to a teenager in front of his/her friends. Some more than others  ;D

It goes further than the embarassment factor though. "Elton John" and his partner and "parents" in the same sentence just cries out as being wrong.

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:09pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:00pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:58pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:54pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:45am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. Well, they're certainly out there. I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner. Bollocks. No, it's a fact actually. I know several single parents who have remained single for many years. But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things.

And you think nobody chooses to remain single? Thats ridiculous. In fact I choose to be single. I do not want a "partner" and am just fine by myself. I have had enough of the marriage business and prefer to travel alone.

There. We do exist. My mother also chose not to remarry when dad left. She has been single for 35 years now. My brother is a bit like you - cant handle being alone. Always thinks he needs someone else around.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:38pm:

... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:09pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:00pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:58pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:54pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:45am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. Well, they're certainly out there. I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner. Bollocks. No, it's a fact actually. I know several single parents who have remained single for many years. But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things. And you think nobody chooses to remain single? Thats ridiculous. In fact I choose to be single. I do not want a "partner" and am just fine by myself. I have had enough of the marriage business and prefer to travel alone. There. We do exist. My mother also chose not to remarry when dad left. She has been single for 35 years now. My brother is a bit like you - cant handle being alone. Always thinks he needs someone else around. SOB

Can't a guy make an impartial observation without the ridiculous inferences?

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:09pm:

But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things.

The single parents I know have all chosen to remain single.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:04pm:

muso wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:59pm: I wouldn't have a problem with that. My issue is with two gay men who adopt a "trophy" child who is unrelated to either. That's where I'd have concerns. I can't explain why. It just seems wrong to me. "Here's one of my parents, Dad and Dad...."

You right wing nutjobs.   You do realise that we have perfectly functioning Gay parents right now, and everything is working out just fine.   
They may be gay parents because one of the men/women was in a previous hetro relationship that sporned a child, or one of them convinced a opposite sex friend to be the surrogate (same as many childless hetro couples do).

At the end of the day, only one person can be the father. One dad.

Gay marriage doesnt make any difference to this situation.

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:43pm:

... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:09pm: But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things. The single parents I know have all chosen to remain single.

I'm sure they have.  When it's a choice between being single and hooking up with someone in your league, being single is often the best option. 

Doctor Jolly wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:56pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:04pm: muso wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:59pm: I wouldn't have a problem with that. My issue is with two gay men who adopt a "trophy" child who is unrelated to either. That's where I'd have concerns. I can't explain why. It just seems wrong to me. "Here's one of my parents, Dad and Dad...." You right wing nutjobs.   You do realise that we have perfectly functioning Gay parents right now, and everything is working out just fine.    They may be gay parents because one of the men/women was in a previous hetro relationship that sporned a child, or one of them convinced a opposite sex friend to be the surrogate (same as many childless hetro couples do). At the end of the day, only one person can be the father. One dad. Gay marriage doesnt make any difference to this situation.

How do you know? 

uncle meat hates Australian natives and calls invaders victims of injustice... 8-)

muso wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:14pm:

It's almost inevitable that any parents will be embarassing  to a teenager in front of his/her friends. Some more than others  ;D It goes further than the embarassment factor though. "Elton John" and his partner and "parents" in the same sentence just cries out as being wrong.

It would be embarrassing every time a kid asks, "where do babies come from?"

corporate_whitey wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 3:10pm:

uncle meat hates Australian natives and calls invaders victims of injustice... 8-)

and what do Uncle Vegetable and Uncle Cereal say?

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 3:06pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:43pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:09pm: But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things. The single parents I know have all chosen to remain single. I'm sure they have.  When it's a choice between being single and hooking up with someone in your league, being single is often the best option.

Just can't stand being wrong, can you?

What a small "man" you are.    ::)

corporate_whitey wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 3:10pm:

uncle meat hates Australian natives and calls invaders victims of injustice... 8-)

No, I hate the idea of people ignoring their doctor's advice and subsequently going off their meds.

I don't hate people.

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 3:17pm:

... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 3:06pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:43pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:09pm: But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things. The single parents I know have all chosen to remain single. I'm sure they have.  When it's a choice between being single and hooking up with someone in your league, being single is often the best option.  Just can't stand being wrong, can you? What a small man you are.    ::)

Dunno - never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens.

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 3:19pm:

Dunno - never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens.

I'm not sure what made you think I'd be interested.

Knock yourself out though; I'm sure you'll relish the human contact.

The Government wages war on our communities and calls invaders victims of injustice...The Greens and the ALP are responsible for killing millions of innocent civilians...its called democide and they are engaged in it right now.  :P

I didn't know the gay community had their own union. :P
Other than that,what a piss weak thread, its usually the  closet dwellers that are the most vocal. ::)

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:41pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:38pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:09pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:00pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:58pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:54pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:45am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. Well, they're certainly out there. I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner. Bollocks. No, it's a fact actually. I know several single parents who have remained single for many years. But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things. And you think nobody chooses to remain single? Thats ridiculous. In fact I choose to be single. I do not want a "partner" and am just fine by myself. I have had enough of the marriage business and prefer to travel alone. There. We do exist. My mother also chose not to remarry when dad left. She has been single for 35 years now. My brother is a bit like you - cant handle being alone. Always thinks he needs someone else around. SOB Can't a guy make an impartial observation without the ridiculous inferences?

How was that an impartial observation? It was the 2nd time you said it. You needed to be shown you were wrong.

SOB

skippy. wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 3:40pm:

I didn't know the gay community had their own union. :P Other than that,what a piss weak thread, its usually the  closet dwellers that are the most vocal. ::)

Oh glad you could join us then. You will make the thread better wont you. Wont you?

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 3:57pm:

skippy. wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 3:40pm: I didn't know the gay community had their own union. :P Other than that,what a piss weak thread, its usually the  closet dwellers that are the most vocal. ::) Oh glad you could join us then. You will make the thread better wont you. Wont you? SOB

I already did with my presence, shame I cant say the same thing for you. :P

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 3:56pm:

How was that an impartial observation? It was the 2nd time you said it. You needed to be shown you were wrong. SOB

1.  No, it was the 1st time.
2.  It's not wrong by any definition.  Simply being single and making a conscious choice to stay single are 2 different things. 

I am trying really hard not to mention your stupidity but you sure don't make it easy.

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 2:41pm:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:38pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:09pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:00pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:58pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:54pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:45am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. Well, they're certainly out there. I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner. Bollocks. No, it's a fact actually. I know several single parents who have remained single for many years. But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things. And you think nobody chooses to remain single? Thats ridiculous. In fact I choose to be single. I do not want a "partner" and am just fine by myself. I have had enough of the marriage business and prefer to travel alone. There. We do exist. My mother also chose not to remarry when dad left. She has been single for 35 years now. My brother is a bit like you - cant handle being alone. Always thinks he needs someone else around. SOB Can't a guy make an impartial observation without the ridiculous inferences?

Okay so what you did was change the subject so you wouldn't have to answer then?

Look @ the previous conversation:

you:  Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner.

you:  Bollocks.

you:  But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things.

So this is a completely different point you are making? In the middle of a discussion?

I am trying very hard not to mention your stupidity but you dont make it easy.

SOB

The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??).

Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 4:20pm:

... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:41pm: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:38pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:09pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 2:00pm: Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:58pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 1:54pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:45am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:43am: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:33am: ____ wrote on May 13th, 2012 at 7:28am: Children where one parent has dies Children born of surrogate mothers Children where one parent is not allowed to see the child (i.e imprisonment) Should these children be left at risk of mental illness, or should they be taken away and put into a oppose sex couple marriage home? Greeny will you get of your agenda of selfishness, Think of the Children. Single Parents do seek partners allowing children to have both male and female influences in the child's life. SOME singles may seek partners. Most dont have time cause they are too busy looking after kids and working to pay for kids. SOB Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. Well, they're certainly out there. I know of many single parents who aren't seeking a new partner. Bollocks. No, it's a fact actually. I know several single parents who have remained single for many years. But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things. And you think nobody chooses to remain single? Thats ridiculous. In fact I choose to be single. I do not want a "partner" and am just fine by myself. I have had enough of the marriage business and prefer to travel alone. There. We do exist. My mother also chose not to remarry when dad left. She has been single for 35 years now. My brother is a bit like you - cant handle being alone. Always thinks he needs someone else around. SOB Can't a guy make an impartial observation without the ridiculous inferences? Okay so what you did was change the subject so you wouldn't have to answer then? Look @ the previous conversation: you:  Bulldust, i have not met a single parent yet who doesnt seek a new partner. you:  Bollocks. you:  But remaining single and choosing to remain single are 2 very different things. So this is a completely different point you are making? In the middle of a discussion? I am trying very hard not to mention your stupidity but you dont make it easy. SOB

It clearly says who wrote what.   You will see that I only made 1 comment.

Why am I not suprised that even this simple task is beyond you?

Gist wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 4:30pm:

The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong.

Correct. 

" ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens." 

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 4:37pm:

Gist wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:30pm: The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong. Correct.  " ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens."  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41

Aaaand....what was I wrong about meathead? 

Did you believe the ALP & Greens are deliberately engineering the moral defeat of my people and facilitating invasion of my country? :P

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 4:38pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:37pm: Gist wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:30pm: The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong. Correct.  " ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens."  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41 Aaaand....what was I wrong about meathead?

Nah didn't think so.

How about you gits? 

I LOL @ the pair of you little bitches.

One with no brain, the other with no balls. 

I know that a lot of corrupt people have gotten rich by pushing vice onto my country and my people...remember when we had the vice squad?  And that since the Government has been pushing vice my peoples culture is being decimated and invaded... :P :-X :D :( :-?

Ahhh yes I see bloodyripper made the first comment but you did say "bollocks" and moved the goalpost because you were wrong.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 5:00pm:

Ahhh yes I see bloodyripper made the first comment but you did say "bollocks" and moved the goalpost because you were wrong. SOB

NO, I didn't say "bollocks" either.

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 4:50pm:

Nah didn't think so. How about you gits?  I LOL @ the pair of you little bitches. One with no brain, the other with no balls.

;D

Have you started work on your next new name Weasely? Can I suggest you work something up around "dickless"? Maybe Dickless.Dude ??? Kinda fits as a series with some of your recent names.

Did the Government, the corporate maggot and aristocracy get rich off vice and engineering the moral and cultural degeneration of Australia and invasion?  Sounds like illegal Terra Nullis to me... 8-)

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 4:38pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:37pm: Gist wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:30pm: The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong. Correct.  " ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens."  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41 Aaaand....what was I wrong about meathead?

Try to keep up.

You're just making a fool of yourself now.

Just had to resort to "meathead", didn't you? 

No surprise there: when proven wrong you look for any way out, including juvenile insults.    ::)

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/39#39

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 5:11pm:

... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:38pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:37pm: Gist wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:30pm: The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong. Correct.  " ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens."  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41 Aaaand....what was I wrong about meathead?  Try to keep up. You're just making a fool of yourself now. Just had to resort to "meathead", didn't you?  No surprise there: when proven wrong you look for any way out, including juvenile insults.    ::) http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/39#39

Gee, I wonder why you refuse to provide a quote or example.  ::)

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 4:50pm:

... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:38pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:37pm: Gist wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:30pm: The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong. Correct.  " ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens."  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41 Aaaand....what was I wrong about meathead?  Nah didn't think so. How about you gits?  I LOL @ the pair of you little bitches. One with no brain, the other with no balls.

LOL

And now the juvenile insults are ramping up.

Love it    ;D

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 5:13pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 5:11pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:38pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:37pm: Gist wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:30pm: The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong. Correct.  " ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens."  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41 Aaaand....what was I wrong about meathead?  Try to keep up. You're just making a fool of yourself now. Just had to resort to "meathead", didn't you?  No surprise there: when proven wrong you look for any way out, including juvenile insults.    ::) http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/39#39 Gee, I wonder why you refuse to provide a quote or example.  ::)

The red thing at the bottom of my post was a link.

Use your mouse and click on it.

If you need further instruction, just let me know.

Cheers.

::)

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 5:16pm:

... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:50pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:38pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:37pm: Gist wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:30pm: The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong. Correct.  " ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens."  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41 Aaaand....what was I wrong about meathead?  Nah didn't think so. How about you gits?  I LOL @ the pair of you little bitches. One with no brain, the other with no balls.  LOL And now the juvenile insults are ramping up. Love it    ;D

You're the one with no balls.  But I guess you knew that, since you do have a brain.

Not enough of a brain to avoid providing a link to the same thread were on though.  Just quote it man bitch.

Is Julia Gillard & the government deliberately trying to debauch Australians with vice  weaken our families and communities and undermine our capacity to resist invasion? 8-)

Well. That was a big distraction from the topic wasnt it? lol.

Single parents bring up children why shouldn't 2 single parents do it together as a gay couple?

SOB

... wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 5:17pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 5:16pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:50pm: ... wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:38pm: Uncle Meat wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:37pm: Gist wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 4:30pm: The thing with Weasely.Gripes (aka "the tolerator"  :P ) is that when shown to be wrong (as he often is) he will go into denial. When that doesn't work he will try changing the subject or else narrow the focus to ludicrous levels. When that still doesn't work he will scamper away and hide. When that still doesn't work he will change his name (how many times is that now RompsWithDonkeys??). Like the dickless snipe he is, at no time will he actually have the fortitude to admit he was wrong. Correct.  " ... never been wrong.  I'll let you know how I feel if it ever happens."  http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1336856857/41#41 Aaaand....what was I wrong about meathead?  Nah didn't think so. How about you gits?  I LOL @ the pair of you little bitches. One with no brain, the other with no balls.  LOL And now the juvenile insults are ramping up. Love it    ;D You're the one with no balls.  But I guess you knew that, since you do have a brain. Not enough of a brain to avoid providing a link to the same thread were on though.  Just quote it man bitch.

And now it's just insult after insult.


;D

You've officially lost the plot    ;D

If we look at it objectively, this is not about equality, it is about robbing my people of their country. 8-)

Who heard that the Government is deliberately debasing Australians with vice in order to destroy our families, our culture and engineer invasion of our country? 8-)

corporate_whitey wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 5:09pm:

Sounds like illegal Terra Nullis to me...

Everything sounds like illegal Terra Nullis to you....

Frances wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 5:59pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 5:09pm: Sounds like illegal Terra Nullis to me... Everything sounds like illegal Terra Nullis to you....

Of course...you understand why having a Western Government and given their proven track reckord, we would be suspicious of them engaging in these activities - dealing in vice, human trafficking, social engineering ect ... :P 8-)

http://www.thefilmleague.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/the_matrix-11347.jpeg 8-)

There he goes with that stupid looking picture again.....

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 5:22pm:

Well. That was a big distraction from the topic wasnt it? lol. Single parents bring up children why shouldn't 2 single parents do it together as a gay couple? SOB

Heh

Frances wrote on May 15^th, 2012 at 6:07pm:

There he goes with that stupid looking picture again.....

I really dont get what you have against that photo... 8-)

Is anyone ELSE getting THIS today ...


Quote:

Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@ozpolitic.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. More information about this error may be available in the server error log. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Server at www.ozpolitic.com Port 80

... when posting ?

buzzanddidj wrote on May 16^th, 2012 at 5:15pm:

Is anyone ELSE getting THIS today ... Quote: Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@ozpolitic.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. More information about this error may be available in the server error log. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Server at www.ozpolitic.com Port 80 ... when posting ?

No. Maybe you ISP is monitoring your activity.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 16^th, 2012 at 5:17pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on May 16th, 2012 at 5:15pm: Is anyone ELSE getting THIS today ... Quote: Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, webmaster@ozpolitic.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. More information about this error may be available in the server error log. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Server at www.ozpolitic.com Port 80 ... when posting ? No. Maybe you ISP is monitoring your activity. SOB

Thanks, but NAH !
I'm with SkyMesh (satellite)
They don't know how to do ANYTHING

http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/547498_10151108825509966_167774004965_13384019_1522037202_n.jpg

And the top reason: we are all american.

SOB

"Truly this proposition deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment,"

-Bob Katter summing it up nicely.

... wrote on May 18^th, 2012 at 2:25pm:

"Truly this proposition deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment," -Bob Katter summing it up nicely.

Wasn't that Katter's grandfather - on abolishing Kanak slavery, in the cane-feilds of FNQ ?

http://www.janeresture.com/kanakas/index.htm

... wrote on May 18^th, 2012 at 2:25pm:

"Truly this proposition deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment," -Bob Katter summing it up nicely.

Agreed.

The proposition put forward - "Gay unions a 'risk to kids' " - deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment.

Uncle Meat wrote on May 18^th, 2012 at 2:45pm:

... wrote on May 18th, 2012 at 2:25pm: "Truly this proposition deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment," -Bob Katter summing it up nicely. Agreed. The proposition put forward - "Gay unions a 'risk to kids' " - deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment.

Isnt bob katter the racist guy i saw on tv the other night? Said something about how we should bring back white australia policy? Nah nobody would say that.. . . .

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 18^th, 2012 at 2:50pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 18th, 2012 at 2:45pm: ... wrote on May 18th, 2012 at 2:25pm: "Truly this proposition deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment," -Bob Katter summing it up nicely. Agreed. The proposition put forward - "Gay unions a 'risk to kids' " - deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment. Isnt bob katter the racist guy i saw on tv the other night? Said something about how we should bring back white australia policy? Nah nobody would say that.. . . . SOB

Not many white Australians wouldn't think it, not any who were around before Multicultural policies took hold, Australia was a truly great country back then.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 18^th, 2012 at 2:50pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 18th, 2012 at 2:45pm: ... wrote on May 18th, 2012 at 2:25pm: "Truly this proposition deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment," -Bob Katter summing it up nicely. Agreed. The proposition put forward - "Gay unions a 'risk to kids' " - deserves to be laughed at and ridiculed. It doesn't serve any serious treatment. Isnt bob katter the racist guy i saw on tv the other night? Said something about how we should bring back white australia policy? Nah nobody would say that.. . . . SOB

Nobody in their right mind, no.

Being raised by homosexuals in inner suburbs causes profound psychological damage to children and may result in pathological behavioral problems. 8-)

FD in that list of yours....

I was watching a doco a couple of nights ago about Switzerland. They did #9 on your list for real.

Can't remember how long the policy was in place but it was many decades at least and wasn't abolished until about the 1950's (? from my dodgy memory). Single mothers would routinely have their children taken away. Unwed mothers would have newborns taken away. But it could include newly widowed mothers with older children. No right of appeal, no court involvement.

Seems the children for the most part were then contracted out as cheap farm labour.

Pretty sad.