How can Swan hope to have his budget taken seriously when he picks and chooses what he includes in it? He is keeping the NBN out of it in a desperate and pathetic attempt to make it look like he will produce a surplus, along with other government spending. That can only be for one reason - to cook the books. Don't include certain items of spending and it starts to look like he's spent less than the government collected in taxes. It's a pity for him that the deficit he forecast has more than tripled from $12bn to $37bn. He has no credibility when it comes to budgets and his incompetence is only forcing up interest rates.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/announcing-the-great-bouncing-labor-budget/story-e6frezz0-1226343011854

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 7:36am:

How can Swan hope to have his budget taken seriously when he picks and chooses what he includes in it? He is keeping the NBN out of it in a desperate and pathetic attempt to make it look like he will produce a surplus, along with other government spending. That can only be for one reason - to cook the books. Don't include certain items of spending and it starts to look like he's spent less than the government collected in taxes. It's a pity for him that the deficit he forecast has more than tripled from $12bn to $37bn. He has no credibility when it comes to budgets and his incompetence is only forcing up interest rates. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/announcing-the-great-bouncing-labor-budget/story-e6frezz0-1226343011854

How can anyone take your thread seriously? The budget won't be announced till next week!

http://www.greenpeace.org.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fortune-teller.jpg

just assuming what Hockey is claiming is even only half true... what the hell is going on??just who can we believe if the treasurer ANY treasurer can do this..

leave in take out.forget to mention...is a crook surely!

Gist, it is not a secret. Swan has said previously that spending on the NBN will not be included in the budget. Another poor attempt at deflecting...

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 10:36am:

Gist, it is not a secret. Swan has said previously that spending on the NBN will not be included in the budget. Another poor attempt at deflecting...

The NBN is not a recurrent expenditure item for the budget so it wil not affect the budget. However, it is a very large capital expenditure item which will be added to the current debt which is closing in on $250B.

The Budget Surplus is a con, being built on moving things around and borrowing money to pay for others. And in the end, it wont even be acheived. It isnt just a mirage; it is a mirage of a mirage.

borntorule wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 1:06pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 10:36am: Gist, it is not a secret. Swan has said previously that spending on the NBN will not be included in the budget. Another poor attempt at deflecting... The NBN is not a recurrent expenditure item for the budget so it wil not affect the budget. However, it is a very large capital expenditure item which will be added to the current debt which is closing in on $250B. The Budget Surplus is a con, being built on moving things around and borrowing money to pay for others. And in the end, it wont even be acheived. It isnt just a mirage; it is a mirage of a mirage.

The word "surplus" doesn't even appear in the ALP dictionary. Nor does "competence", or the term "fiscal responsibility".

Quote:

Joe Hockey The Daily Telegraph May 01, 201212:00AM

The Telegraph can not print their own stories with sufficient bias - they need to have Liberal politicians do it for them.

Dnarever wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 5:56pm:

Quote: Joe Hockey The Daily Telegraph May 01, 201212:00AM The Telegraph can not print their own stories with sufficient bias - they need to have Liberal politicians do it for them.

I notice you complain only of who created that article, not its content. Obviously you cannot repudiate it because it is true.

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 6:47pm:

Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 5:56pm: Quote: Joe Hockey The Daily Telegraph May 01, 201212:00AM The Telegraph can not print their own stories with sufficient bias - they need to have Liberal politicians do it for them. I notice you complain only of who created that article, not its content. Obviously you cannot repudiate it because it is true.

I think the photo posted by Gist points out the source of the content.

There is no credible content only spin based on a fairy tale created by a seer.

Do you think Hockey can get us the numbers for the Melbourne Quaddy next week?

Dnarever wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 10:27pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 6:47pm: Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 5:56pm: Quote: Joe Hockey The Daily Telegraph May 01, 201212:00AM The Telegraph can not print their own stories with sufficient bias - they need to have Liberal politicians do it for them. I notice you complain only of who created that article, not its content. Obviously you cannot repudiate it because it is true. I think the photo posted by Gist points out the source of the content. There is no credible content only spin based on a fairy tale created by a seer. Do you think Hockey can get us the numbers for the Melbourne Quaddy next week?

Do you think Gillard will win the next election? Only in your wet dreams!!!  ;D ;D ;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 7:36am:

How can Swan hope to have his budget taken seriously when he picks and chooses what he includes in it? He is keeping the NBN out of it in a desperate and pathetic attempt to make it look like he will produce a surplus, along with other government spending. That can only be for one reason - to cook the books. Don't include certain items of spending and it starts to look like he's spent less than the government collected in taxes. It's a pity for him that the deficit he forecast has more than tripled from $12bn to $37bn. He has no credibility when it comes to budgets and his incompetence is only forcing up interest rates. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/announcing-the-great-bouncing-labor-budget/story-e6frezz0-1226343011854

And on this mornings radio, it was announced Swan has also left out the $10B allocated for green energy as well as the NBN out of the budget.
Talk about cooking the books.
If I left out my fortnightly mortgage payments out of my household budget and pretended it wasn't there, my monthly household budget would look mighty fine too.
But it doesn't make it right though.
Swan should just cut to the chase and leave everything out of the expenditure side of the budget.
If he is going to kid himself that the government isn't spending more than the nation is earning, why not go the whole hog.
You wouldn't trust Swan with the office petty cash tin let alone this nations budget.

Gist wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 8:39am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 7:36am: How can Swan hope to have his budget taken seriously when he picks and chooses what he includes in it? He is keeping the NBN out of it in a desperate and pathetic attempt to make it look like he will produce a surplus, along with other government spending. That can only be for one reason - to cook the books. Don't include certain items of spending and it starts to look like he's spent less than the government collected in taxes. It's a pity for him that the deficit he forecast has more than tripled from $12bn to $37bn. He has no credibility when it comes to budgets and his incompetence is only forcing up interest rates. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/announcing-the-great-bouncing-labor-budget/story-e6frezz0-1226343011854 How can anyone take your thread seriously? The budget won't be announced till next week! http://www.greenpeace.org.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fortune-teller.jpg

The confidentiality and security on the latest budget information is as leaky as your continence pad Gist. :)
Time to switch your radio on eh.

chicken_lipsforme wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 10:10am:

The confidentiality and security on the latest budget information is as leaky as your continence pad Gist. :) Time to switch your radio on eh.

Continence pad???!? You mean incontinence pad don't you? And I don't need one! My sphincter is fully functional, just like my brain thanks very much! Yours on the other hand...  ;D

But if ever I wanted my brain to leak out of my ears I would indeed start listening to that talkback radio you lot seem to favour.  :D

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 7:36am:

How can Swan hope to have his budget taken seriously when he picks and chooses what he includes in it? He is keeping the NBN out of it in a desperate and pathetic attempt to make it look like he will produce a surplus, along with other government spending. That can only be for one reason - to cook the books. Don't include certain items of spending and it starts to look like he's spent less than the government collected in taxes. It's a pity for him that the deficit he forecast has more than tripled from $12bn to $37bn. He has no credibility when it comes to budgets and his incompetence is only forcing up interest rates. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/announcing-the-great-bouncing-labor-budget/story-e6frezz0-1226343011854

Phony Tonys office skirt  must be impressed with Swan,even if the Liberal party gazette were correct, which knowing the lies they spew is highly unlikely, Swans budget at worse case scenario would be half the mismanaged 70 billion dollar hole Hockey and your chump,phony Tony tried to serve up. It must suck to be a partisan hack nobody  in phony Tony's office .

chicken_lipsforme wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 10:05am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 7:36am: How can Swan hope to have his budget taken seriously when he picks and chooses what he includes in it? He is keeping the NBN out of it in a desperate and pathetic attempt to make it look like he will produce a surplus, along with other government spending. That can only be for one reason - to cook the books. Don't include certain items of spending and it starts to look like he's spent less than the government collected in taxes. It's a pity for him that the deficit he forecast has more than tripled from $12bn to $37bn. He has no credibility when it comes to budgets and his incompetence is only forcing up interest rates. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/announcing-the-great-bouncing-labor-budget/story-e6frezz0-1226343011854 And on this mornings radio, it was announced Swan has also left out the $10B allocated for green energy as well as the NBN out of the budget. Talk about cooking the books. If I left out my fortnightly mortgage payments out of my household budget and pretended it wasn't there, my monthly household budget would look mighty fine too. But it doesn't make it right though. Swan should just cut to the chase and leave everything out of the expenditure side of the budget. If he is going to kid himself that the government isn't spending more than the nation is earning, why not go the whole hog. You wouldn't trust Swan with the office petty cash tin let alone this nations budget.

Historically , ALP governments have always spent less than liberal/ coalition governments .... but lets not let facts get in the way of a good slogan ... I can see Abbott slogan writers working overtime on this one

Johnsmith wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 1:23pm:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on May 2nd, 2012 at 10:05am: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 7:36am: How can Swan hope to have his budget taken seriously when he picks and chooses what he includes in it? He is keeping the NBN out of it in a desperate and pathetic attempt to make it look like he will produce a surplus, along with other government spending. That can only be for one reason - to cook the books. Don't include certain items of spending and it starts to look like he's spent less than the government collected in taxes. It's a pity for him that the deficit he forecast has more than tripled from $12bn to $37bn. He has no credibility when it comes to budgets and his incompetence is only forcing up interest rates. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/announcing-the-great-bouncing-labor-budget/story-e6frezz0-1226343011854 And on this mornings radio, it was announced Swan has also left out the $10B allocated for green energy as well as the NBN out of the budget. Talk about cooking the books. If I left out my fortnightly mortgage payments out of my household budget and pretended it wasn't there, my monthly household budget would look mighty fine too. But it doesn't make it right though. Swan should just cut to the chase and leave everything out of the expenditure side of the budget. If he is going to kid himself that the government isn't spending more than the nation is earning, why not go the whole hog. You wouldn't trust Swan with the office petty cash tin let alone this nations budget. Historically , ALP governments have always spent less than liberal/ coalition governments .... but lets not let facts get in the way of a good slogan ... I can see Abbott slogan writers working overtime on this one

You're kidding right? I thought all Leftards complain that Coalition governments don't spend enough, yet you now whine they spend more than ALP governments? You need your head examined if you really believe that. Look at this ALP government - they are borrowing as if money grows on trees, made it so they can increase the amount they are able to borrow and allow the debt to grow by at least $100m per day. They even tried to spend their way out of the GFC with a pathetic stimulus package which ended in entirely preventable deaths and billions of dollars wasted/rorted due to a lack of checks and balances. Labor have no freaking idea what good fiscal policy is - wouldn't know it if it hit them in the head.

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 1:53pm:

You're kidding right? I thought all Leftards complain that Coalition governments don't spend enough, yet you now whine they spend more than ALP governments? You need your head examined if you really believe that. ...

That's because Liberals waste the money they spend on stupid stuff like middle income welfare instead of responsible stuff like infrastructure.


Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 1:53pm:

...  They even tried to spend their way out of the GFC with a pathetic stimulus package which ended in entirely preventable deaths and billions of dollars wasted/rorted due to a lack of checks and balances. Labor have no freaking idea what good fiscal policy is - wouldn't know it if it hit them in the head.

Correct, they did spend our way out of the GFC with the result that Australia is the only country in the OECD not to be in recession. But of course you Lieberal hacks would rather have tens of thousands out of work and on the dole wouldn't you?

Oh... and the pink batts scheme saved lives, not cost them, as was conclusively shown by the CSIRO. But of course that's a fact that's just too distasteful to you Lieberal stooges.

You find it more palatable to lie.

How's Godwin Grech Mk II coming along??  :D :D

cods wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 8:55am:

just assuming what Hockey is claiming is even only half true... what the hell is going on??just who can we believe if the treasurer ANY treasurer can do this.. leave in take out.forget to mention...is a crook surely!

Yes Cods but you would believe the coalition if they told you the martians have landed and are regenerating all the old people. We are talking about the bloke who is trying to cover up Abbott's 90 billion and growing every day black hole in his promises.

Gist wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 6:32pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2nd, 2012 at 1:53pm: You're kidding right? I thought all Leftards complain that Coalition governments don't spend enough, yet you now whine they spend more than ALP governments? You need your head examined if you really believe that. ... That's because Liberals waste the money they spend on stupid stuff like middle income welfare instead of responsible stuff like infrastructure. Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2nd, 2012 at 1:53pm: ...  They even tried to spend their way out of the GFC with a pathetic stimulus package which ended in entirely preventable deaths and billions of dollars wasted/rorted due to a lack of checks and balances. Labor have no freaking idea what good fiscal policy is - wouldn't know it if it hit them in the head. Correct, they did spend our way out of the GFC with the result that Australia is the only country in the OECD not to be in recession. But of course you Lieberal hacks would rather have tens of thousands out of work and on the dole wouldn't you? Oh... and the pink batts scheme saved lives, not cost them, as was conclusively shown by the CSIRO. But of course that's a fact that's just too distasteful to you Lieberal stooges. You find it more palatable to lie. How's Godwin Grech Mk II coming along??  :D :D

Tell that to the families of the young men who died inside the roof of a number of houses. Idiot!

Armchair Politician lives up to his name again, criticizing a budget that has not yet been revealed. It's like reviewing a movie without watching it.

Stupidity personified.

                                                                                        http://www.gifs.net/Animation11/Words/New/newsflash.gif



The Federal Opposition has again incorrectly alleged that it could save money by cutting the Labor Federal Government’s multi-billion dollar National Broadband Network project, despite financial projections which show the project is likely to make the Government billions.

The NBN is not listed in the Federal Budget as an expense because it is technically a government investment and will consequently not divert money away from other projects. This accounting technique has been verified by economists from the Parliamentary Library of Australia as an “internationally accepted accounting standard”

In addition, in the long term, NBN Co’s projections show the network is slated to make a return of between 5.3 percent and 8.8 percent on the up to $44.6 billion that will be invested in the network — meaning it will return an amount ranging from $1.93 billion to $3.92 billion, as well as delivering Australia a fibre optic telecommunications network to replace Telstra’s aging copper infrastructure.

http://delimiter.com.au/2012/02/08/coalition-missteps-on-nbn-budget-savings/

GoddyofOz wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 9:31pm:

Armchair Politician lives up to his name again, criticizing a budget that has not yet been revealed. It's like reviewing a movie without watching it. Stupidity personified.

Swan has been releasing some details - snippets of the budget you moron.

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 9:20pm:

Tell that to the families of the young men who died inside the roof of a number of houses. Idiot!

Ah... the typical response from a braindead hack. So... I gather you preferred to kill MORE people? Why don't you tell that to the families of those who didn't die but would have!

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 9:20pm:

Gist wrote on May 2nd, 2012 at 6:32pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2nd, 2012 at 1:53pm: You're kidding right? I thought all Leftards complain that Coalition governments don't spend enough, yet you now whine they spend more than ALP governments? You need your head examined if you really believe that. ... That's because Liberals waste the money they spend on stupid stuff like middle income welfare instead of responsible stuff like infrastructure. Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2nd, 2012 at 1:53pm: ...  They even tried to spend their way out of the GFC with a pathetic stimulus package which ended in entirely preventable deaths and billions of dollars wasted/rorted due to a lack of checks and balances. Labor have no freaking idea what good fiscal policy is - wouldn't know it if it hit them in the head. Correct, they did spend our way out of the GFC with the result that Australia is the only country in the OECD not to be in recession. But of course you Lieberal hacks would rather have tens of thousands out of work and on the dole wouldn't you? Oh... and the pink batts scheme saved lives, not cost them, as was conclusively shown by the CSIRO. But of course that's a fact that's just too distasteful to you Lieberal stooges. You find it more palatable to lie. How's Godwin Grech Mk II coming along??  :D :D Tell that to the families of the young men who died inside the roof of a number of houses. Idiot!

ANOTHER attempt at "pulling the GUILT strings"




buzzanddidj wrote on May 1^st, 2012 at 8:27pm:

This government's GREAT failure has been its inability to sell its achievements and successes - and counteract criticism The LibNat/Australian team ... http://www.starobserver.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Tony-1024x768.jpg ... have been VERY successful in exploiting this weak spot There never WAS an "outbreak" of house fires from the home insulation stimulus scheme In FACT, there was a large REDUCTION - in REAL TERMS There never WAS "massive rorting" associated with the Building Education Revolution The independent audit found "value for money" in over 98% of cases of the 6000 plus projects, that employed tens of thousands over the worst of the GFC The handful of examples, repeatedly exploited by The Australian, were in that under 2% area The bulk of that area were project managed by the NSW Education Department Did the Government step forward to set the record straight ? NO ( ... or if they DID, "The Australian" didn't cover it)

ONE death was the result of extreme heat exhaustion
ANOTHER resulted from the use of an already BANNED product

ALL FOUR resulted from breaches of O.H.& S. LAW, on the part of the employers

Despite insulation installation increasing FOURTEEN fold in a year - possibly related fire incidents DOUBLED

This is a DROP of near 90% in REAL TERMS

ALL due to the FIRST ever "code of practice" and set of safety standards to the industry




PAST figures of work-place related deaths over the previous decades are not available - but a rational mind could ONLY find they had a 90% DROP - in real terms - as WELL

Doing well this Labor Government eh Buzz?

Do you think they might drop below 20%?

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 6:37am:

Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 10:27pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 6:47pm: Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 5:56pm: Quote: Joe Hockey The Daily Telegraph May 01, 201212:00AM The Telegraph can not print their own stories with sufficient bias - they need to have Liberal politicians do it for them. I notice you complain only of who created that article, not its content. Obviously you cannot repudiate it because it is true. I think the photo posted by Gist points out the source of the content. There is no credible content only spin based on a fairy tale created by a seer. Do you think Hockey can get us the numbers for the Melbourne Quaddy next week? Do you think Gillard will win the next election? Only in your wet dreams!!!

When trying to support the ramblings of a fool the best tactic is to take a step to the side and point at someone else.

The topic has nothing to do with who will win the next election but how stupid Mr Hockey can make himself look and how obviously biased, dishonest and agenda driven sections of the media have been.

Dnarever wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 10:21am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2nd, 2012 at 6:37am: Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 10:27pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 6:47pm: Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 5:56pm: Quote: Joe Hockey The Daily Telegraph May 01, 201212:00AM The Telegraph can not print their own stories with sufficient bias - they need to have Liberal politicians do it for them. I notice you complain only of who created that article, not its content. Obviously you cannot repudiate it because it is true. I think the photo posted by Gist points out the source of the content. There is no credible content only spin based on a fairy tale created by a seer. Do you think Hockey can get us the numbers for the Melbourne Quaddy next week? Do you think Gillard will win the next election? Only in your wet dreams!!!  When trying to support the ramblings of a fool the best tactic is to take a step to the side and point at someone else. The topic has nothing to do with who will win the next election but how stupid Mr Hockey can make himself look and how obviously biased, dishonest and agenda driven sections of the media have been.

Even Dnarever has given up that one and has admitted to an utter arse raping that labor will get at the election.

Ignore the people and govern arrogantly against their wishes at your peril.

buzzanddidj wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 10:14pm:

http://www.gifs.net/Animation11/Words/New/newsflash.gif The Federal Opposition has again incorrectly alleged that it could save money by cutting the Labor Federal Government’s multi-billion dollar National Broadband Network project, despite financial projections which show the project is likely to make the Government billions. The NBN is not listed in the Federal Budget as an expense because it is technically a government investment and will consequently not divert money away from other projects. This accounting technique has been verified by economists from the Parliamentary Library of Australia as an “internationally accepted accounting standard” In addition, in the long term, NBN Co’s projections show the network is slated to make a return of between 5.3 percent and 8.8 percent on the up to $44.6 billion that will be invested in the network — meaning it will return an amount ranging from $1.93 billion to $3.92 billion, as well as delivering Australia a fibre optic telecommunications network to replace Telstra’s aging copper infrastructure. http://delimiter.com.au/2012/02/08/coalition-missteps-on-nbn-budget-savings/

Anyone who believes the NBN will be a profit making experience has rocks in their head. Virtually every goalpost for the NBN has been missed. It is already 2 years over its original date. The budget has been increased and takeup rates are about 1/5 of what is expected. You can believe what you like about the NBN's worth but expecting ot to make a profit at all  - nevermind a windfall - is the reasoning of people who have never looked at govt-run businesses. Even the Commonwealth bank, operating in a secotr that is a licenst to print money, made the lowest by far profits of any major bank when govt-owned. In a market like telecommunications, the chances of ANY company making a huge profit is small and a govt operation, nil chance.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 10:13am:

Doing well this Labor Government eh Buzz? Do you think they might drop below 20%? ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

THIS one may ...







buzzanddidj wrote on May 2^nd, 2012 at 9:31am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 17th, 2010 at 8:32am: The warnings of where speed cameras will be the following day is an excellent one. Too many times the poor Brumby turfed-out Government used speed cameras to raise revenue and not to prevent speeding. Government relies on fines to top up its revenue May 01, 2012 http://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/images/uploadedfiles/editorial/pictures/2012/05/01/SPEEDCAMER_CROP-1_FF744156_785020.JPG FINES for speeding motorists and other law breakers will reap a record $2.8 billion for government coffers over the next four years. More than ever, the State Government will depend on fines to stay in the black. A 12.5 per cent hike in fines was foreshadowed before Budget day, and this move will deliver an additional $70 million to the bottom line during 2012-13. But the value of the hike will then soar, bringing in an extra $118 million the following year. Taking into account the 2.5 per cent rise from July 1 that had been approved in March, fines will deliver an extra $109 million to the bottom line. Without that, the Baillieu Government would have been left with a razor-thin $46 million surplus. Budget papers said the increase was largely due to the 12.5 per cent hike on top of the regular increase that’s linked to the consumer price index, which was 2.5 per cent. Toll road evasion fines were expected to rise by 14.4 per cent, and non-traffic and court fines were expected to go up by 16.7 per cent. But speed camera fine revenue will soar by 19.1 per cent, and police on-the-spot fines even more, by 26.9 per cent. The Budget papers concede that “road safety initiatives” will be another reason for the increased reliance on fines. Treasurer Kim Wells said people weren’t forced to pay fines. “With the fines, it’s a voluntary system,” Mr Wells said. “We have put it in as a revenue measure (and) at the end of the day, if people don’t speed or drop litter, or graffiti, they don’t pay.” The Budget papers say the fine increase was “to strengthen the deterrence of offending behaviour”. But the move will leave the government $419 million better off over the next four years. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/government-relies-on-fines-to-top-up-its-revenue/story-fn7x8me2-1226343935051

It's all gone well though hasn't it Buzz?

Remember the polls you used to put you like clockwork about how good Rudd was, how far in front Labor were??

Ah they seem like about 30 years ago now eh?

Then Rudd was axed, you dropped your support for him immediately - and this Government lurched from disaster to disaster ever since.

Strange how you and I, being from such similar backgrounds as you point out, seem so far apart in how we saw this coming eh?
:)

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 11:27am:

It's all gone well though hasn't it Buzz? Remember the polls you used to put you like clockwork about how good Rudd was, how far in front Labor were?? Ah they seem like about 30 years ago now eh? Then Rudd was axed, you dropped your support for him immediately - and this Government lurched from disaster to disaster ever since. Strange how you and I, being from such similar backgrounds as you point out, seem so far apart in how we saw this coming eh? :)

Why should we take notice of anything you say you don't ever live here you say you don't vote here so f^%$ off andrei and go back and complain about the country you were born in, if you don't know where it is try South Africa.

All you are doing is ripping off the Australia tax payers.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 10:24am:

Dnarever wrote on May 3rd, 2012 at 10:21am: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 2nd, 2012 at 6:37am: Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 10:27pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 6:47pm: Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2012 at 5:56pm: Quote: Joe Hockey The Daily Telegraph May 01, 201212:00AM The Telegraph can not print their own stories with sufficient bias - they need to have Liberal politicians do it for them. I notice you complain only of who created that article, not its content. Obviously you cannot repudiate it because it is true. I think the photo posted by Gist points out the source of the content. There is no credible content only spin based on a fairy tale created by a seer. Do you think Hockey can get us the numbers for the Melbourne Quaddy next week? Do you think Gillard will win the next election? Only in your wet dreams!!!  When trying to support the ramblings of a fool the best tactic is to take a step to the side and point at someone else. The topic has nothing to do with who will win the next election but how stupid Mr Hockey can make himself look and how obviously biased, dishonest and agenda driven sections of the media have been. Even Dnarever has given up that one and has admitted to an utter arse raping that labor will get at the election. Ignore the people and govern arrogantly against their wishes at your peril.

What is it with conservatives and comprehension?