Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Feedback >> Banning
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1335402491

Message started by Spot of Borg on Apr 26th, 2012 at 11:08am

Title: Banning
Post by Spot of Borg on Apr 26th, 2012 at 11:08am
How do you know when someone has been banned? Have you just had a banning spree? Its gotten awful quiet . . . .

SOB

Title: Re: Banning
Post by skippy. on Apr 26th, 2012 at 11:16am

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 11:08am:
How do you know when someone has been banned? Have you just had a banning spree? Its gotten awful quiet . . . .

SOB

You don't know when someone has been banned, it doesn't show up anywhere.
That said, I doubt there has been a banning spree, this forum doesn't work like that.

Title: Re: Banning
Post by dsmithy70 on Apr 26th, 2012 at 12:15pm
I think we should have a weekly newsletter.
Links to hot threads
Welcome to new members
Recipes
Cartoons
Prayer of the week
and of course.... Those banned, for how long & rule broken.

If we had this we could keep score & have an awards night.

Title: Re: Banning
Post by The tolerator on Apr 26th, 2012 at 12:18pm
Regardless of who's been banned, it's great to have prevailing back.

Title: Re: Banning
Post by freediver on Apr 26th, 2012 at 1:15pm
We do not normally reveal who has been banned as that is a matter for the admin and the member. They are welcome to tell you if they want.

Yes I think we have had a lot of temporary suspensions lately due to personal abuse.

Title: Re: Banning
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Apr 26th, 2012 at 2:09pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 12:15pm:
I think we should have a weekly newsletter.
Links to hot threads
Welcome to new members
Recipes
Cartoons
Prayer of the week
and of course.... Those banned, for how long & rule broken.
If we had this we could keep score & have an awards night.



Mate that's an awesome idea.
The only section I actually look for in the Chartered Accounting magazine is the section of members who have been in court and suspended and why.

You can usually piece together what happened through the list of charges.

1. Incorrectly signing off accounts
2. Knowingly concealing bonus pool from external auditor
3. Creating known fraudulent supplier
4. Not following sign off processes
5. Creating fictitious bank supplier
6. Refusing to comply with police investigation
7. Perjury
etc etc
Result : Life suspension from Institution

Title: Re: Banning
Post by blackadder on Apr 26th, 2012 at 2:37pm
No banning here, just finding it incredibly boring  so taking a break.

Must say I enjoyed roopoo and gist acting like girls on the pedo thread.

If you are going to give you have to be able to take and not complain to the mods but they are both cowards.


Title: Re: Banning
Post by Spot of Borg on Apr 26th, 2012 at 3:14pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 12:15pm:
I think we should have a weekly newsletter.
Links to hot threads
Welcome to new members
Recipes
Cartoons
Prayer of the week
and of course.... Those banned, for how long & rule broken.

If we had this we could keep score & have an awards night.


Lol.

I would leave out the prayer thing though.

SOB

Title: Re: Banning
Post by Spot of Borg on Apr 26th, 2012 at 3:15pm

freediver wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 1:15pm:
We do not normally reveal who has been banned as that is a matter for the admin and the member. They are welcome to tell you if they want.

Yes I think we have had a lot of temporary suspensions lately due to personal abuse.


Thanks.

SOB

Title: Re: Banning
Post by skippy. on Apr 26th, 2012 at 3:30pm
bladder wrote
Quote:
No banning here,

That makes a nice change for you. :o

Title: Re: Banning
Post by Gist on Apr 26th, 2012 at 4:35pm

blackadder wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 2:37pm:
No banning here, just finding it incredibly boring  so taking a break.

Must say I enjoyed roopoo and gist acting like girls on the pedo thread.

If you are going to give you have to be able to take and not complain to the mods but they are both cowards.


Oh, you been crying all this time eh? You do that a lot. Must suck to be you. Still, it's better than you deserve.

Title: Re: Banning
Post by Spot of Borg on Apr 27th, 2012 at 10:15am
This is really annoying. Can you tell me when they will be back? That is if they come back. Maybe they will leave.

SOB

Title: Re: Banning
Post by muso on Apr 27th, 2012 at 11:56am
As FD said, we don't usually release that info.  Apart from anything else, if we made it known, they would return to potentially more abuse and would be tempted to return fire.

The objective is to reduce the amount of abuse on the board. A public pillory type humiliation complete with rotten tomates would be totally counter productive to that objective.

Title: Re: Banning
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Apr 27th, 2012 at 12:01pm

Gist wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 4:35pm:

blackadder wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 2:37pm:
No banning here, just finding it incredibly boring  so taking a break.

Must say I enjoyed roopoo and gist acting like girls on the pedo thread.

If you are going to give you have to be able to take and not complain to the mods but they are both cowards.


Oh, you been crying all this time eh? You do that a lot. Must suck to be you. Still, it's better than you deserve.



Now here's a bloke who shouldn't have been allowed back - he's clearly learned nothing and still spends 90% of his time abusing others.

Title: Re: Banning
Post by Gist on Apr 27th, 2012 at 2:21pm
Allowed back? I never went anywhere Andrei! Just been busy is all.

And bagging blackadder doesn't count. Ask anyone.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.