Homosexual radicals are lobbying to have heterosexuals in need of life saving blood transfusions forced to accept blood from sexually active Homosexual men to end that they see as discrimination against Homosexual men.  Do you agree?  Sourced from a story on the Panel - channel 10. :-[ :-? :o :( :o

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VrnzZDdO9z4/T5HFKXJQM0I/AAAAAAAABzU/etHqmSn7Bco/s1600/Screen+Shot+2012-04-21+at+6.20.04+AM.png
::)

Sodomy should be taught at all schools..not just Catholic schools!

Oh my goodness, no.

We might all catch the Gay.

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 6:42pm:

Homosexual radicals are lobbying to have heterosexuals in need of life saving blood transfusions to accept blood from sexually active Homosexual men to end that they see as discrimination against Homosexual men.  Do you agree? :-[ :-? :o :( :o

Obviously you know that sexual preference has nothing to do with blood viability.

Thing is I dont really trust any blood after howard changing the policies on it. We used to have the safest blood in the world then howard came along and removed some of the safeguards and started importing potentially unsafe blood from other countries.

All the links I can find on it are PDFs. Hopefully you ppl remember this.

A book for anyone that wants to read it

SOB

Please leave the Homo propaganda for another thread, this is a serious terrorist threat to the blood supply that could cost lives, show some sensitivity.  Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood supply with the Homo Virus HIV.  If they are going to donate blood it should be used exclusively for Homosexual men and no one else!
:(

Quote:

Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood suppl

Would you prefer to limit the blood supply to donors with their virginities in tact?

It'd be a long, lonely day in the blood bus.

AIDS KILLS
http://www.avert.org/apps/media_gallery/files/images/236/the-grim-reaper-australia-aids-campaign-1987-web.jpg
Say no to Subversion and contamination of our blood supply!
:(

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Please leave the Homo propaganda for another thread, this is a serious terrorist threat to the blood supply that could cost lives, show some sensitivity.  Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood supply with the Homo Virus HIV.  If they are going to donate blood it should be used exclusively for Homosexual men and no one else! :(

The problem you have is i just can not take you seriously

Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 7:05pm:

Quote: Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood suppl Would you prefer to limit the blood supply to donors with their virginities in tact? It'd be a long, lonely day in the blood bus.

I would like you to stop trying to force your debauched views on the rest of society.
8-)

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 7:07pm:

AIDS KILLS http://www.avert.org/apps/media_gallery/files/images/236/the-grim-reaper-australia-aids-campaign-1987-web.jpg Say no to Subversion and contamination of our blood supply! :(

bit late for that according to Spot of Borg...

Obviously you know that sexual preference has nothing to do with blood viability.

Thing is I dont really trust any blood after howard changing the policies on it. We used to have the safest blood in the world then howard came along and removed some of the safeguards and started importing potentially unsafe blood from other countries.

All the links I can find on it are PDFs. Hopefully you ppl remember this.

A book for anyone that wants to read it


so here we are all thinking it is Abbott that wants to kill us all off.. and it was Howard all along..

how many have died from blood transfusions.. thats what I want to know???? since bloody Howard changed the rules..

imagine the deviousness of it all...

behind our backs.. who would have thought.

Blood Transfusions From blood donated from Homosexual men will give you aids.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U219eUIZ7Qo
:(

When Abbott gets into power he needs to tighten up legislation on this enshrining it in law that Heterosexuals be protected from contaminated Homosexual blood transfusions. :(

cods wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 7:15pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 7:07pm: AIDS KILLS http://www.avert.org/apps/media_gallery/files/images/236/the-grim-reaper-australia-aids-campaign-1987-web.jpg Say no to Subversion and contamination of our blood supply! :( bit late for that according to Spot of Borg... Obviously you know that sexual preference has nothing to do with blood viability. Thing is I dont really trust any blood after howard changing the policies on it. We used to have the safest blood in the world then howard came along and removed some of the safeguards and started importing potentially unsafe blood from other countries. All the links I can find on it are PDFs. Hopefully you ppl remember this. A book for anyone that wants to read it so here we are all thinking it is Abbott that wants to kill us all off.. and it was Howard all along.. how many have died from blood transfusions.. thats what I want to know???? since bloody Howard changed the rules.. imagine the deviousness of it all... behind our backs.. who would have thought.

Behind our backs? I didnt say it was behind our backs.

And how do you know nobody has died? because the media hasnt reported it? They will when it serves their purposes. I have no idea what abbott has in store for australian blood supplies. I dont think gillard has mentioned it either.

SOB

This is indicative of how insidious the whole homosexual agenda is that they are prepared to engage in bio terrorism in their quest to create homosexual rule on earth. :(

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 7:35pm:

This is indicative of how insidious the whole homosexual agenda is that they are prepared to engage in bio terrorism in their quest to create homosexual rule on earth. :(

There are supposed to be safeguards on donated blood. It is checked for aids. Hopefully. But how can you be sure heterosexual blood hasnt got aids or hep c? Hmmmm? Think of that?

SOB

CW is advocating a push for donor blood from the veins of deaf and blind virgins who are first tested for purity of mind.

All blood is screened in Australia and people who have unprotected sex or travelled overseas within a certain time limit are excluded from giving blood for medical use.....If someone is found to have lied about anything on the questionnaire when giving blood they can be prosecuted!!!

You could always give blood yourself mate or ask a relative to give blood if you need a transfusion or operation.....Or you could just die and let someone else have the blood you reject.....It is up to you but no one can force you to accept blood!!!

::) ::) ::)

This constitutes a malicious conspiracy and bio terrorist threat against the blood supply which the Government must act on under law to protect the health and safety of citizens.  Ther police need to start arresting ring leaders and bringing them in for interrogation as to why they are waging a propaganda campaign to subvert the blood supply. >:(

Say no to the push to allow the Homosexual grim reapers to force their blood on us just so they can feel vindicated one more time for their cause at our expense..perverts.
http://faustusnotes.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/grim-reaper-aids-200x0.jpg
:(

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 8:03pm:

This constitutes a malicious conspiracy and bio terrorist threat against the blood supply which the Government must act on under law to protect the health and safety of citizens.  Ther police need to start arresting ring leaders and bringing them in for interrogation as to why they are waging a propaganda campaign to subvert the blood supply. >:(

The act is coming along well.

Life_goes_on wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 8:10pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 8:03pm: This constitutes a malicious conspiracy and bio terrorist threat against the blood supply which the Government must act on under law to protect the health and safety of citizens.  Ther police need to start arresting ring leaders and bringing them in for interrogation as to why they are waging a propaganda campaign to subvert the blood supply. >:( The act is coming along well.

Get lost pervert. >:(

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 8:02pm:

All blood is screened in Australia and people who have unprotected sex or travelled overseas within a certain time limit are excluded from giving blood for medical use.....If someone is found to have lied about anything on the questionnaire when giving blood they can be prosecuted!!! You could always give blood yourself mate or ask a relative to give blood if you need a transfusion or operation.....Or you could just die and let someone else have the blood you reject.....It is up to you but no one can force you to accept blood!!! ::) ::) ::)

Here is the mindset of the degenerate - they will force you to accept their filthy contaminated blood or die...perverts. :( :P

http://www.foolsparadise.co.uk/foolsparadise2010/2010pix/MattBarnardXmasFairyImage1.jpg

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 9:42pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 8:02pm: All blood is screened in Australia and people who have unprotected sex or travelled overseas within a certain time limit are excluded from giving blood for medical use.....If someone is found to have lied about anything on the questionnaire when giving blood they can be prosecuted!!! You could always give blood yourself mate or ask a relative to give blood if you need a transfusion or operation.....Or you could just die and let someone else have the blood you reject.....It is up to you but no one can force you to accept blood!!! ::) ::) ::) Here is the mindset of the degenerate - they will force you to accept their filthy contaminated blood or die...perverts. :( :P

No one can force you to accept blood.....It is your choice whether you die or not!!!

:) :) :)

Insanity is just what we call stupidity when it doesn't make sense.
Josh Lieb, I am a Genius of Unspeakable Evil and I Want to be Your Class President, 2009

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 10:50pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 9:42pm: philperth2010 wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 8:02pm: All blood is screened in Australia and people who have unprotected sex or travelled overseas within a certain time limit are excluded from giving blood for medical use.....If someone is found to have lied about anything on the questionnaire when giving blood they can be prosecuted!!! You could always give blood yourself mate or ask a relative to give blood if you need a transfusion or operation.....Or you could just die and let someone else have the blood you reject.....It is up to you but no one can force you to accept blood!!! ::) ::) ::) Here is the mindset of the degenerate - they will force you to accept their filthy contaminated blood or die...perverts. :( :P No one can force you to accept blood.....It is your choice whether you die or not!!! :) :) :) Insanity is just what we call stupidity when it doesn't make sense. Josh Lieb, I am a Genius of Unspeakable Evil and I Want to be Your Class President, 2009

The fact is its banned and once the Government wakes up to the legal ramifications of deliberately contaminating the blood supply for the sake of lunatic perverts and ideological extremists like you, the people pushing this agenda will be labeled bio terrorists which is what they are its all about them...boo hoo - go get a life you pathetic moral pipsqueak. 8-)

Apart from The Borg and Corporate Whitey

the rest of you seem to be posting for pay

That's the logical conclusion, based on your comments

You've adhered to the Paid-to-Post manual instructions, as is made obvious by the fact you've attempted to ridicule the OP in the first instance

Then, in cowardly, despicable tag-team action, you've been supported in your attempted ridicule by other Paid to Posts (which may just as easily be sock-puppets of the original Paid-to-Posts, as most realise)

Obviously Corporate Whitey has touched on a genuine scandal, as opposed to the current fake political scandal

and you've knee-jerkedly responded in the hope of shutting him and this thread down

Yes.  It is a scandal that blood donated by homos has been injected into blood supplies

It is a SCANDAL !

It needs to be widely disseminated

because the average Aussie IS unaware and would be OUTRAGED and DISGUSTED, if they knew

so I am going to post this information several times in succession, in all the fora of which I'm member

and no, you have not put the kybosh on the information relayed by Corporate Whitey -- how's that ?


Next:  why DO so many homosexuals insist on donating blood ?

Ever wondered ?

I have.  Just as I wondered a decade or two ago when it was revealed that AIDS was transmissable via blood supplies

The conclusion to which I was forced is that homosexuals, who like to pretend they're a version of female -- donate blood in imitation of genuine females' menstrual cycle

make sense ?

homosexuals like to pretend they're 'having their period' ?

Or maybe it's far more insidious ?  Maybe homosexual AIDS victims are actively encouraged to donate blood by scum employed to assure AIDS infected homosexuals that their blood is 'just as good as' clean, non-AIDS infected blood ?

and not for the reason you might think, i.e., NOT to 'cull the population' via AIDS.  Oh no.  Instead, in order scum Big Pharma can sell their endless versions of 'cures' for lab-created AIDS

But as to whether or not ANYone should be required to accept transfusion of homosexual blood -- take it to the streets, huh ?  Take it to the streets and see how many are prepared to accept homosexual blood or see it transfused into their children.  And be prepared to run for your life ---

Quote:

The conclusion to which I was forced is that homosexuals, who like to pretend they're a version of female -- donate blood in imitation of genuine females' menstrual cycle make sense ? homosexuals like to pretend they're 'having their period'

You're mental.

And I wasn't paid a dollar to let you know.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 6:57am:

Quote: The conclusion to which I was forced is that homosexuals, who like to pretend they're a version of female -- donate blood in imitation of genuine females' menstrual cycle make sense ? homosexuals like to pretend they're 'having their period' You're mental. And I wasn't paid a dollar to let you know.

It is the mental that is the worry Annie. This discourse and the fruit cake that started the thread are sounding like dare i say it Breivik. Fundamentalist right wing nut jobs that have deep prejudice because they have managed to wreck their own lives.

Life_goes_on wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 8:10pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 8:03pm: This constitutes a malicious conspiracy and bio terrorist threat against the blood supply which the Government must act on under law to protect the health and safety of citizens.  Ther police need to start arresting ring leaders and bringing them in for interrogation as to why they are waging a propaganda campaign to subvert the blood supply. >:( The act is coming along well.

I'm glad someone else has picked up on it.

Sorry CW, it shouldn't prejudice your case, we are only two of many.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 6:57am:

Quote: The conclusion to which I was forced is that homosexuals, who like to pretend they're a version of female -- donate blood in imitation of genuine females' menstrual cycle make sense ? homosexuals like to pretend they're 'having their period' You're mental. And I wasn't paid a dollar to let you know.

Shameless deviant. :(

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!

This thread is the silliest one I have seen on this forum today. Well so far since I am still reading.

Just for ppl that didnt notice the guy talking about the menstrual cycle was joking. It was tongue in cheek. A parody. Because this thread needs to be parodied hahahahaha.

Our blood supply may or may not be as safe as you want it to be but it has nothing to do with ppls sexual preferences. There are tests done and checks in place for keeping the blood pure.

SOB

Out of interest - when you give blood do you have to declare your sexual orientation?

I know you do on insurance forms in the UK, or you used to have to, the reason being that gay people according to the insurance companies lead a riskier lifestyle.
The information is of course kept confidential.

Unless of course you are good mates with someone who works there. I found out Colin Jackson the hurdler was queer many years before it became common knowledge.
Though its quite funny when you see his interviews now and how feminine he is, I don't know why I didn't spot it before.
He is all very Noel Coward.

Anyway back to my question - if you give blood do you have to tell them if you're homo?

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 8:17am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 6:57am: Quote: The conclusion to which I was forced is that homosexuals, who like to pretend they're a version of female -- donate blood in imitation of genuine females' menstrual cycle make sense ? homosexuals like to pretend they're 'having their period' You're mental. And I wasn't paid a dollar to let you know. Shameless deviant. :(

Aww thanks, CW.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 9:01am:

Out of interest - when you give blood do you have to declare your sexual orientation? I know you do on insurance forms in the UK, or you used to have to, the reason being that gay people according to the insurance companies lead a riskier lifestyle. The information is of course kept confidential. Unless of course you are good mates with someone who works there. I found out Colin Jackson the hurdler was queer many years before it became common knowledge. Though its quite funny when you see his interviews now and how feminine he is, I don't know why I didn't spot it before. He is all very Noel Coward. Anyway back to my question - if you give blood do you have to tell them if you're homo?

http://www.donateblood.com.au/


Quote:

Within the last 12 months have you: Had male to male sex (that is, oral or anal sex) with or without a condom? Had sex (with or without a condom) with a male who you think may have had oral or anal sex (with or without a condom) with another man? Been a male or female sex worker (e.g. received payment for sex in money, gifts or drugs?) Engaged in sex with a male or female sex worker? If at any time, the answer is 'yes' to any of the above questions, then you will be deferred from donating for 12 months after the last occurrence of any of the above sexual activities.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 9:05am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 9:01am: Out of interest - when you give blood do you have to declare your sexual orientation? I know you do on insurance forms in the UK, or you used to have to, the reason being that gay people according to the insurance companies lead a riskier lifestyle. The information is of course kept confidential. Unless of course you are good mates with someone who works there. I found out Colin Jackson the hurdler was queer many years before it became common knowledge. Though its quite funny when you see his interviews now and how feminine he is, I don't know why I didn't spot it before. He is all very Noel Coward. Anyway back to my question - if you give blood do you have to tell them if you're homo? http://www.donateblood.com.au/ Quote: Within the last 12 months have you: Had male to male sex (that is, oral or anal sex) with or without a condom? Had sex (with or without a condom) with a male who you think may have had oral or anal sex (with or without a condom) with another man? Been a male or female sex worker (e.g. received payment for sex in money, gifts or drugs?) Engaged in sex with a male or female sex worker? If at any time, the answer is 'yes' to any of the above questions, then you will be deferred from donating for 12 months after the last occurrence of any of the above sexual activities.

I suppose thats fair enough.
Whether people like it or not, we have to reduce risk.

I found it offensive I couldn't donate because I grew up in England.

andrei<<I found it offensive I couldn't donate because I grew up in England.>>
................................................................

They have to be careful, your kind are risky.

"Anyway back to my question - if you give blood do you have to tell them if you're homo?"

Here ya go. Find out if you can give blood.

I cant

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 10:21am:

"Anyway back to my question - if you give blood do you have to tell them if you're homo?" Here ya go. Find out if you can give blood. I cant SOB

I can't in Australia.
I grew up in Great Britain and they seem to dislike us.

nairbe wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 7:10pm:

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 7:02pm: Please leave the Homo propaganda for another thread, this is a serious terrorist threat to the blood supply that could cost lives, show some sensitivity.  Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood supply with the Homo Virus HIV.  If they are going to donate blood it should be used exclusively for Homosexual men and no one else! :( The problem you have is i we just can not take you seriously

But we DO need to hear from the "village idiot" ...

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_faUmWE3xCzs/S-XqGjTTvQI/AAAAAAAAAKc/sYDk4PIf0oc/s1600/untitled.bmp


... from time to time


Just to "lighten the moment"

Quote:

A hospital has confirmed that more than 80 people have been infected with HIV/AIDS from contaminated blood, Wuhan Morning Post reported Wednesday. The patients were all given blood transfusions carrying the disease in a central China township between 1996 and 1997. Some unknowingly passed the virus on to their spouses or children, bringing the total number infected above 100, Xu Chunyang, deputy dean of the No.2 Hospital in Daye, Hubei, told reporters Monday. "Our hospital unwittingly gave contaminated blood to these patients," explained Xu. Xu added that the contaminated blood came from farmers infected with HIV/AIDS who donated their blood for money in Henan province. The hospital has been more than 8 million yuan ($1.17 million) in debt after making offers of compensation to the patients. The first to get compensation received a one-off payment of 190,000 yuan and a monthly allowance of 500 yuan.

Nobody can give a 100% guarantee that screening will pick up HIV contamination.  This is why every effort must be made to minimise the risk - this includes banning people who have had tattoos/piercings within 6 months or a year, people who lived in britain between certain years, neither category of which has anywhere near the risk as homosexuals.  You can call it homophobic, I call it facts.

... wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:04am:

Quote: A hospital has confirmed that more than 80 people have been infected with HIV/AIDS from contaminated blood, Wuhan Morning Post reported Wednesday. The patients were all given blood transfusions carrying the disease in a central China township between 1996 and 1997. Some unknowingly passed the virus on to their spouses or children, bringing the total number infected above 100, Xu Chunyang, deputy dean of the No.2 Hospital in Daye, Hubei, told reporters Monday. "Our hospital unwittingly gave contaminated blood to these patients," explained Xu. Xu added that the contaminated blood came from farmers infected with HIV/AIDS who donated their blood for money in Henan province. The hospital has been more than 8 million yuan ($1.17 million) in debt after making offers of compensation to the patients. The first to get compensation received a one-off payment of 190,000 yuan and a monthly allowance of 500 yuan. Nobody can give a 100% guarantee that screening will pick up HIV contamination.  This is why every effort must be made to minimise the risk - this includes banning people who have had tattoos/piercings within 6 months or a year, people who lived in britain between certain years, neither category of which has anywhere near the risk as homosexuals.  You can call it homophobic, I call it facts.

AIDS is just as prevalent in heterosexual circles nowadays. It has already spread. It is not a "homosexual" disease anymore. Anyway AIDS isnt the only threat with blood. Theres hepatitis C and prolly other things I am not thinking of right now.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:07am:

... wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:04am: Quote: A hospital has confirmed that more than 80 people have been infected with HIV/AIDS from contaminated blood, Wuhan Morning Post reported Wednesday. The patients were all given blood transfusions carrying the disease in a central China township between 1996 and 1997. Some unknowingly passed the virus on to their spouses or children, bringing the total number infected above 100, Xu Chunyang, deputy dean of the No.2 Hospital in Daye, Hubei, told reporters Monday. "Our hospital unwittingly gave contaminated blood to these patients," explained Xu. Xu added that the contaminated blood came from farmers infected with HIV/AIDS who donated their blood for money in Henan province. The hospital has been more than 8 million yuan ($1.17 million) in debt after making offers of compensation to the patients. The first to get compensation received a one-off payment of 190,000 yuan and a monthly allowance of 500 yuan. Nobody can give a 100% guarantee that screening will pick up HIV contamination.  This is why every effort must be made to minimise the risk - this includes banning people who have had tattoos/piercings within 6 months or a year, people who lived in britain between certain years, neither category of which has anywhere near the risk as homosexuals.  You can call it homophobic, I call it facts. AIDS is just as prevalent in heterosexual circles nowadays. It has already spread. It is not a "homosexual" disease anymore. Anyway AIDS isnt the only threat with blood. Theres hepatitis C and prolly other things I am not thinking of right now. SOB

Insurance though is all about managing risk isn't it?

Gay people have a riskier lifestyle than normal families etc.
That's just the way it is.

It isn't offensive or anything nasty - its just recognizing that its less risky to the general public.

Gay people are promiscuous in their style of living - hence increasing the risk of infection.

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:07am:

... wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:04am: Quote: A hospital has confirmed that more than 80 people have been infected with HIV/AIDS from contaminated blood, Wuhan Morning Post reported Wednesday. The patients were all given blood transfusions carrying the disease in a central China township between 1996 and 1997. Some unknowingly passed the virus on to their spouses or children, bringing the total number infected above 100, Xu Chunyang, deputy dean of the No.2 Hospital in Daye, Hubei, told reporters Monday. "Our hospital unwittingly gave contaminated blood to these patients," explained Xu. Xu added that the contaminated blood came from farmers infected with HIV/AIDS who donated their blood for money in Henan province. The hospital has been more than 8 million yuan ($1.17 million) in debt after making offers of compensation to the patients. The first to get compensation received a one-off payment of 190,000 yuan and a monthly allowance of 500 yuan. Nobody can give a 100% guarantee that screening will pick up HIV contamination.  This is why every effort must be made to minimise the risk - this includes banning people who have had tattoos/piercings within 6 months or a year, people who lived in britain between certain years, neither category of which has anywhere near the risk as homosexuals.  You can call it homophobic, I call it facts. AIDS is just as prevalent in heterosexual circles nowadays. It has already spread. It is not a "homosexual" disease anymore. Anyway AIDS isnt the only threat with blood. Theres hepatitis C and prolly other things I am not thinking of right now. SOB

No it isn't.  Not even close.


Quote:

HIV transmission in Australia occurs primarily through sexual contact between men. Around 65% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2009 were among men who have sex with men; 28.7% were exposed through heterosexual contact; 2.3% were due to injecting drug use; and a further 3% were men with a history of both injecting drug use and sex with other men

http://www.avert.org/aids-hiv-australia.htm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:10am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:07am: ... wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:04am: Quote: A hospital has confirmed that more than 80 people have been infected with HIV/AIDS from contaminated blood, Wuhan Morning Post reported Wednesday. The patients were all given blood transfusions carrying the disease in a central China township between 1996 and 1997. Some unknowingly passed the virus on to their spouses or children, bringing the total number infected above 100, Xu Chunyang, deputy dean of the No.2 Hospital in Daye, Hubei, told reporters Monday. "Our hospital unwittingly gave contaminated blood to these patients," explained Xu. Xu added that the contaminated blood came from farmers infected with HIV/AIDS who donated their blood for money in Henan province. The hospital has been more than 8 million yuan ($1.17 million) in debt after making offers of compensation to the patients. The first to get compensation received a one-off payment of 190,000 yuan and a monthly allowance of 500 yuan. Nobody can give a 100% guarantee that screening will pick up HIV contamination.  This is why every effort must be made to minimise the risk - this includes banning people who have had tattoos/piercings within 6 months or a year, people who lived in britain between certain years, neither category of which has anywhere near the risk as homosexuals.  You can call it homophobic, I call it facts. AIDS is just as prevalent in heterosexual circles nowadays. It has already spread. It is not a "homosexual" disease anymore. Anyway AIDS isnt the only threat with blood. Theres hepatitis C and prolly other things I am not thinking of right now. SOB Insurance though is all about managing risk isn't it? Gay people have a riskier lifestyle than normal families etc. That's just the way it is. It isn't offensive or anything nasty - its just recognizing that its less risky to the general public. Gay people are promiscuous in their style of living - hence increasing the risk of infection.

No they arent. Some are and some heterosexuals are promiscuous too. Homosexuality isnt a "lifestyle". Its a sexual preference.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:22am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:10am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:07am: ... wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:04am: Quote: A hospital has confirmed that more than 80 people have been infected with HIV/AIDS from contaminated blood, Wuhan Morning Post reported Wednesday. The patients were all given blood transfusions carrying the disease in a central China township between 1996 and 1997. Some unknowingly passed the virus on to their spouses or children, bringing the total number infected above 100, Xu Chunyang, deputy dean of the No.2 Hospital in Daye, Hubei, told reporters Monday. "Our hospital unwittingly gave contaminated blood to these patients," explained Xu. Xu added that the contaminated blood came from farmers infected with HIV/AIDS who donated their blood for money in Henan province. The hospital has been more than 8 million yuan ($1.17 million) in debt after making offers of compensation to the patients. The first to get compensation received a one-off payment of 190,000 yuan and a monthly allowance of 500 yuan. Nobody can give a 100% guarantee that screening will pick up HIV contamination.  This is why every effort must be made to minimise the risk - this includes banning people who have had tattoos/piercings within 6 months or a year, people who lived in britain between certain years, neither category of which has anywhere near the risk as homosexuals.  You can call it homophobic, I call it facts. AIDS is just as prevalent in heterosexual circles nowadays. It has already spread. It is not a "homosexual" disease anymore. Anyway AIDS isnt the only threat with blood. Theres hepatitis C and prolly other things I am not thinking of right now. SOB Insurance though is all about managing risk isn't it? Gay people have a riskier lifestyle than normal families etc. That's just the way it is. It isn't offensive or anything nasty - its just recognizing that its less risky to the general public. Gay people are promiscuous in their style of living - hence increasing the risk of infection. No they arent. Some are and some heterosexuals are promiscuous too. Homosexuality isnt a "lifestyle". Its a sexual preference. SOB

It is a sexual preference and there is a lifestyle that comes along with it.

I worked for a Pharma company whose principal revenue was in anti-HIV drugs.
I can tell you that every single study we had and reviewed, shows that HIV and AIDS in developed world is miles higher in the gay community than the regular hetero community.

To suggest they are on a par ignores every study I have ever seen.

Maybe in black Africa but that's completely different.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:10am:

Gay people are promiscuous in their style of living - hence increasing the risk of infection.

As, too, the BRITISH - being carriers of the Creutzfeldt-Jakob virus

... along with Americans


Mad cow disease found in California
April 25, 2012 - 10:17AM

http://www.chemistryviews.org/common/images/thumbnails/source/12cf410dec1.jpg


http://www.smh.com.au/world/mad-cow-disease-found-in-california-20120425-1xkan.html



Quote:

Ensuring blood safety We recognise that the Australian community has confidence and trust in the Australian Red Cross Blood Service to have one of the safest blood supplies in the world. It is our most important driver as an organisation. Each time you give blood, we test your donation for ABO (blood type), Rh groups (i.e. positive or negative) and red cell antibodies. We also test all donations for five transfusion-transmissible infectious diseases, using seven different tests: HIV/AIDS hepatitis B hepatitis C Human T-cell Lymphotropic Virus- HTLV syphilis. Specifically, we test for the hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to hepatitis C, antibody to both HIV-1 and HIV-2, antibody to HTLV types I and II and antibodies to syphilis. We test all donations for HIV-1 and hepatitis C RNA using Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT). This process is different from traditional testing because it looks for the actual presence of viruses, in this case HIV and HCV. Most other tests detect the presence of antibodies, which are the body's response to an infection and which take time to develop. NAT provides an opportunity to further improve the safety of the blood supply by reducing the window period', which is the time between exposure to a virus to the time current tests are able to detect antibodies to the virus. We also perform a test for malaria on donations from donors who have reported residence in, or travel to, an area with malaria. http://www.donateblood.com.au/about-blood/ensuring-safety

From what Ive seen at work Christmas parties gays and lesbians have nothing on heteros when it comes to promiscuity.

And yet, people living in Briatin around the time of the BSE outbreak are still banned from donating, as are those who have been tattoed/peirced within 6 months.  But, you don't see them jumping up and down about it.  Surely public health trumps the possibility of a handful of militant homos getting their panties in a twist?  Then again, ya never know these days....

... wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:34am:

And yet, people living in Briatin around the time of the BSE outbreak are still banned from donating, as are those who have been tattoed/peirced within 6 months.  But, you don't see them jumping up and down about it.  Surely public health trumps the possibility of a handful of militant homos getting their panties in a twist?  Then again, ya never know these days....

That's my point.
I have never been able to donate in Australia. Yet I accept it and get on with things.

Why is it the gay lobby are always fking moaning and complaining?
How about they shut the bugger up and just get on with life???

Miserable bunch of queens.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:25am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:22am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:10am: Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:07am: ... wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:04am: Quote: A hospital has confirmed that more than 80 people have been infected with HIV/AIDS from contaminated blood, Wuhan Morning Post reported Wednesday. The patients were all given blood transfusions carrying the disease in a central China township between 1996 and 1997. Some unknowingly passed the virus on to their spouses or children, bringing the total number infected above 100, Xu Chunyang, deputy dean of the No.2 Hospital in Daye, Hubei, told reporters Monday. "Our hospital unwittingly gave contaminated blood to these patients," explained Xu. Xu added that the contaminated blood came from farmers infected with HIV/AIDS who donated their blood for money in Henan province. The hospital has been more than 8 million yuan ($1.17 million) in debt after making offers of compensation to the patients. The first to get compensation received a one-off payment of 190,000 yuan and a monthly allowance of 500 yuan. Nobody can give a 100% guarantee that screening will pick up HIV contamination.  This is why every effort must be made to minimise the risk - this includes banning people who have had tattoos/piercings within 6 months or a year, people who lived in britain between certain years, neither category of which has anywhere near the risk as homosexuals.  You can call it homophobic, I call it facts. AIDS is just as prevalent in heterosexual circles nowadays. It has already spread. It is not a "homosexual" disease anymore. Anyway AIDS isnt the only threat with blood. Theres hepatitis C and prolly other things I am not thinking of right now. SOB Insurance though is all about managing risk isn't it? Gay people have a riskier lifestyle than normal families etc. That's just the way it is. It isn't offensive or anything nasty - its just recognizing that its less risky to the general public. Gay people are promiscuous in their style of living - hence increasing the risk of infection. No they arent. Some are and some heterosexuals are promiscuous too. Homosexuality isnt a "lifestyle". Its a sexual preference. SOB It is a sexual preference and there is a lifestyle that comes along with it. I worked for a Pharma company whose principal revenue was in anti-HIV drugs. I can tell you that every single study we had and reviewed, shows that HIV and AIDS in developed world is miles higher in the gay community than the regular hetero community. To suggest they are on a par ignores every study I have ever seen. Maybe in black Africa but that's completely different.

Well maybe you are right about the "studies" I dunno. However you are wrong about the "lifestyle". Especially when you generalise and throw all the gays into 1 basket.

In Sydney there is a street called "oxford street" where a lot of young gay ppl hang out. They go to discos and sleep with each other sometimes. In George street is the same thing for heteros!

On the other hand I know of plenty of gay ppl that you would never pick out of a crowd. you wouldn't. They are just like everyone else. Because they are human. Some humans live a promiscuous lifestyle and some dont.

The reason you can look @ them and say "they are different" is because they are segregated to their own places to hang out. I used to work across the road from a lesbian pub. They had their own little place there to hang out but if you met them elsewhere you would never know.

SOB

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:35am:

... wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 11:34am: And yet, people living in Briatin around the time of the BSE outbreak are still banned from donating, as are those who have been tattoed/peirced within 6 months.  But, you don't see them jumping up and down about it.  Surely public health trumps the possibility of a handful of militant homos getting their panties in a twist?  Then again, ya never know these days.... That's my point. I have never been able to donate in Australia. Yet I accept it and get on with things. Why is it the gay lobby are always fking moaning and complaining? How about they shut the bugger up and just get on with life??? Miserable bunch of queens.

I agree the Gay community are not being discriminated against as many minority groups are banned from giving blood.....However the OP and his supporters seam to think different and have made some very disturbing allegations against gays the government and other posters.....Their comments say more about their ignorance and intolerance than any comment made against their opinions.....By the way I am not paid to have an opinion but I will accept donations!!!

;) ;) ;)

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 6:42pm:

Homosexual radicals are lobbying to have heterosexuals in need of life saving blood transfusions forced to accept blood from sexually active Homosexual men to end that they see as discrimination against Homosexual men.  Do you agree?  Sourced from a story on the Panel - channel 10. :-[ :-? :o :( :o

OMG !

What a MEMORY
( ... or slow thought process ?)


The Ten Network's "The Panel" last aired in 2004

Quote:

Forced Transfusions Of Homosexual Blood

Not on my watch, our blood supply must be kept pure from these homosexual diseases.

Prevailing wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 4:17pm:

Quote: Forced Transfusions Of Homosexual Blood Not on my watch, our blood supply must be kept pure from these homosexual diseases.

LOLOLOLOL

Thi8s entire thread is ridiculous. And nobody is forced to have blood transfusions are they?

SOB

Pump me full of that gay blood.

It might help improve my dress sense.

adelcrow wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 6:46pm:

Sodomy should be taught at all schools..          not just Catholic schools!

HEY !!

That's my BUMPER sticker

Prevailing wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 4:17pm:

Quote: Forced Transfusions Of Homosexual Blood Not on my watch, our blood supply must be kept pure from these homosexual diseases.

The last time HIV was detected, it was from a heterosexual female donor.

This is definitely a case for excluding sexually promiscuous people from donating blood.  I definitely would not want blood from someone who has slept with every wall crawler at the Cross!!!

We have to know that the blood is coming from clean sources.

Reading this topic has made me stop and think.
On one hand, homosexuals say they are born that way, they don't have a choice, like it's some sort of genetic thing, runs in their blood that sort of thing.
On the other hand, gay activists say it's not in their blood, you can't catch it from the 'gay dna' being injected into your system. That it is a sexual preference which insinuates choice.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 10:44pm:

Reading this topic has made me stop and think. On one hand, homosexuals say they are born that way, they don't have a choice, like it's some sort of genetic thing, runs in their blood that sort of thing. On the other hand, gay activists say it's not in their blood, you can't catch it from the 'gay dna' being injected into your system. That it is a sexual preference which insinuates choice.

Why did you choose to be heterosexual?

i.e. why did you choose to be attracted to members of the opposite sex?

And, on what date did you make that decision?

There has to be standards of blood purity, normal sexually monogamous heterosexuals cannot afford to be contaminated by diseased blood from promiscuous homosexuals, drug addicts or prostitutes, that's just being ludicrous.  We should not be exposed to the consequences of their life choices.  If you don't draw the standard it will weaken the immune systems of our whole species leaving us all vulnerable not just to Aids but pandemics that could wipe out millions.  The next transfusion you need to save your life...have a think about where that blood has been, how many needles it has shared and how much unprotected sex it has had and how many partners it has had it with.

Uncle Meat wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 10:50pm:

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 10:44pm: Reading this topic has made me stop and think. On one hand, homosexuals say they are born that way, they don't have a choice, like it's some sort of genetic thing, runs in their blood that sort of thing. On the other hand, gay activists say it's not in their blood, you can't catch it from the 'gay dna' being injected into your system. That it is a sexual preference which insinuates choice. Why did you choose to be heterosexual? i.e. why did you choose to be attracted to members of the opposite sex? And, on what date did you make that decision?

Well i already had a dick to play with, so the way i seen it. i just had to have a pussie as well. As for the date. not sure. i remember i was in primary school. but didnt get to play with one till high school and been playing with them ever since...

I think it should polluter pays, a clean blood supply is essential  human survival, there is only finite supplies of clean blood but there are millions of people living reckless lives that are blood contaminating including promiscuity, homosexual sex and needle sharing drug addicts.  Is it fair these people use up up all of the clean blood supply?  Is it fair that sexually monogamous heterosexuals are exposed to their lifestyle choices?  There needs to be a system of progressive taxation placed on people leading reckless lives polluting the human blood pool and placing an unsustainable burden on this scarce resource.   Such a polluter pays Blood Tax would encourage people to make necessary life style choices that wont place millions of lives at risk.

Prevailing wrote on Apr 26^th, 2012 at 9:02am:

I think it should polluter pays, a clean blood supply is essential  human survival, there is only finite supplies of clean blood but there are millions of people living reckless lives that are blood contaminating including promiscuity, homosexual sex and needle sharing drug addicts.  Is it fair these people use up up all of the clean blood supply?  Is it fair that sexually monogamous heterosexuals are exposed to their lifestyle choices?  There needs to be a system of progressive taxation placed on people leading reckless lives polluting the human blood pool and placing an unsustainable burden on this scarce resource.   Such a polluter pays Blood Tax would encourage people to make necessary life style choices that wont place millions of lives at risk.

Heh. Its moot anyway. Our blood supply isnt autonomous as it used to be. We get blood from other countries specifically america and we have no control over thier laws and checks on it (thanks howard).

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 26^th, 2012 at 9:28am:

Prevailing wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 9:02am: I think it should polluter pays, a clean blood supply is essential  human survival, there is only finite supplies of clean blood but there are millions of people living reckless lives that are blood contaminating including promiscuity, homosexual sex and needle sharing drug addicts.  Is it fair these people use up up all of the clean blood supply?  Is it fair that sexually monogamous heterosexuals are exposed to their lifestyle choices?  There needs to be a system of progressive taxation placed on people leading reckless lives polluting the human blood pool and placing an unsustainable burden on this scarce resource.   Such a polluter pays Blood Tax would encourage people to make necessary life style choices that wont place millions of lives at risk. Heh. Its moot anyway. Our blood supply isnt autonomous as it used to be. We get blood from other countries specifically america and we have no control over thier laws and checks on it (thanks howard). SOB

All the more reason to press the government to act now on Blood Hygiene.

Human behavior and lifestyle choice caused blood contamination is real.

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:28pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 10:50pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 10:44pm: Reading this topic has made me stop and think. On one hand, homosexuals say they are born that way, they don't have a choice, like it's some sort of genetic thing, runs in their blood that sort of thing. On the other hand, gay activists say it's not in their blood, you can't catch it from the 'gay dna' being injected into your system. That it is a sexual preference which insinuates choice. Why did you choose to be heterosexual? i.e. why did you choose to be attracted to members of the opposite sex? And, on what date did you make that decision? Well i already had a dick to play with, so the way i seen it. i just had to have a pussie as well. As for the date. not sure. i remember i was in primary school. but didnt get to play with one till high school and been playing with them ever since...

I didn't realise Sydney women were so desperate. Sad, really.

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 7:02pm:

Please leave the Homo propaganda for another thread, this is a serious terrorist threat to the blood supply that could cost lives, show some sensitivity.  Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood supply with the Homo Virus HIV.  If they are going to donate blood it should be used exclusively for Homosexual men and no one else! :(

1- you're an imbecile, blood is checked and people are screened for HIV.
2- this homophobic thread should be in extremism exposed, I'll Pm a mod and get it moved .
3- you should be banned,I'm going to start Pming your posts to the mods until you are. ;D

This is harassment and an attempt to silence my right to my opinion, I hope the mods take your threats seriously and act against you.  Now leave me alone please, you could be any type of maniac.

Prevailing wrote on Apr 26^th, 2012 at 10:02am:

This is harassment and an attempt to silence my right to my opinion, I hope the mods take your threats seriously and act against you.  Now leave me alone please, you could be any type of maniac.

You posted under the wrong sock imbecile. :D

skippy. wrote on Apr 26^th, 2012 at 10:13am:

Prevailing wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 10:02am: This is harassment and an attempt to silence my right to my opinion, I hope the mods take your threats seriously and act against you.  Now leave me alone please, you could be any type of maniac. You posted under the wrong sock imbecile. :D

lol...it looks that way.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 24^th, 2012 at 7:58pm:

CW is advocating a push for donor blood from the veins of deaf and blind virgins who are first tested for purity of mind.

They need to have white hair too - you know, no pigmentation like lab rats.  The highest risk of HIV is probably from bisexual married men. They tend to hide their lifestyle and are less inclined to use prophylactics. They are also less likely to disclose these details. On the other hand, they are probably less likely to give blood too.

It is a bit of a worry that they are offering money for blood donations these days.

skippy. wrote on Apr 26^th, 2012 at 9:54am:

corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 7:02pm: Please leave the Homo propaganda for another thread, this is a serious terrorist threat to the blood supply that could cost lives, show some sensitivity.  Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood supply with the Homo Virus HIV.  If they are going to donate blood it should be used exclusively for Homosexual men and no one else! :( 1- you're an imbecile, blood is checked and people are screened for HIV. 2- this homophobic thread should be in extremism exposed, I'll Pm a mod and get it moved . 3- you should be banned,I'm going to start Pming your posts to the mods until you are. ;D

Just because someone is completely bonkers is no reason to silence them.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 26^th, 2012 at 10:30am:

skippy. wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 9:54am: corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 7:02pm: Please leave the Homo propaganda for another thread, this is a serious terrorist threat to the blood supply that could cost lives, show some sensitivity.  Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood supply with the Homo Virus HIV.  If they are going to donate blood it should be used exclusively for Homosexual men and no one else! :( 1- you're an imbecile, blood is checked and people are screened for HIV. 2- this homophobic thread should be in extremism exposed, I'll Pm a mod and get it moved . 3- you should be banned,I'm going to start Pming your posts to the mods until you are. ;D Just because someone is completely bonkers is no reason to silence them. SOB

Maybe not, but there is no reason to have the homophobic thread, which is what it is, in the politics board.
Free speech is fine, but pure discrimination is not.

skippy. wrote on Apr 26^th, 2012 at 10:34am:

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 10:30am: skippy. wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 9:54am: corporate_whitey wrote on Apr 24th, 2012 at 7:02pm: Please leave the Homo propaganda for another thread, this is a serious terrorist threat to the blood supply that could cost lives, show some sensitivity.  Blood From sexually active men multiplies the risk of contamination of the blood supply with the Homo Virus HIV.  If they are going to donate blood it should be used exclusively for Homosexual men and no one else! :( 1- you're an imbecile, blood is checked and people are screened for HIV. 2- this homophobic thread should be in extremism exposed, I'll Pm a mod and get it moved . 3- you should be banned,I'm going to start Pming your posts to the mods until you are. ;D Just because someone is completely bonkers is no reason to silence them. SOB Maybe not, but there is no reason to have the homophobic thread, which is what it is, in the politics board. Free speech is fine, but pure discrimination is not.

There are homophobes everywhere. They are entitled to their opinions. They need to be shown anyway. They are even in friggin parliament. Of course the thread is stupid but to those kind of ppl it isnt stupid.

This thread is actually a current concern in real life. Homophobic scared witless ppl will lobby parliament to stop gay blood in thier blood supply. They will do this and more. We need to deal witht hem and silencing them in a forum isnt helping imo.

Besides if everyone agreed there would be no discussion. And we wouldn't have anyone to make fun of.

SOB

BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Apr 25^th, 2012 at 11:28pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 10:50pm: BlOoDy RiPpEr wrote on Apr 25th, 2012 at 10:44pm: Reading this topic has made me stop and think. On one hand, homosexuals say they are born that way, they don't have a choice, like it's some sort of genetic thing, runs in their blood that sort of thing. On the other hand, gay activists say it's not in their blood, you can't catch it from the 'gay dna' being injected into your system. That it is a sexual preference which insinuates choice. Why did you choose to be heterosexual? i.e. why did you choose to be attracted to members of the opposite sex? And, on what date did you make that decision? Well i already had a dick to play with, so the way i seen it. i just had to have a pussie as well. As for the date. not sure. i remember i was in primary school. but didnt get to play with one till high school and been playing with them ever since...

So, you made a decision based on your body parts?

You weren't naturally attracted to women?

Annie Anthrax wrote on Apr 26^th, 2012 at 10:15am:

skippy. wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 10:13am: Prevailing wrote on Apr 26th, 2012 at 10:02am: This is harassment and an attempt to silence my right to my opinion, I hope the mods take your threats seriously and act against you.  Now leave me alone please, you could be any type of maniac. You posted under the wrong sock imbecile. :D lol...it looks that way.

Yes it does.  ;)

I am voicing my own opinion about he pollution of our blood supply by peoples reckless lifestyle choices only.  I am also strongly objecting to that skippy's tone and determination to lobby to have people he/she disagrees with banned to silence them and also your poor judgement decision to move this thread to this offensive location.

I wonder if homosexuals can be cure of the gay by tranfusions of pure everclean magical white hetero blood.

Incomptinence wrote on Apr 29^th, 2012 at 10:18am:

I wonder if homosexuals can be cure of the gay by tranfusions of pure everclean magical white hetero blood.

lololololololol

You left out xtian

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Apr 29^th, 2012 at 10:27am:

lololololololol You left out xtian SOB

Don't worry I am sure some very nice people will be along to tell us how terrorist muslims will attack our blood banks with their veins shortly.
Can you trust an organ transplant from a follower of Islam? Maybe he replaced his heart with a bomb!

All very valid points brought up by nice people.