Funny story, about two cowardly car drivers too scared to show their faces after attacking a cyclists, and now they have 4000 vigilantees after them.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/newtown-cyclist-reaches-out-online-with-beef-about-traffic-car-and-gets-reddit/story-e6frfro0-1226310624556


I hope punishment is swift and severe.

Fair enough. But a cyclist on a double line road with single-lane makes cars either wait while he pedals s-l-owly to the passing dotted lines, or overtake. I paid a big fine for crossing double lines (where do those police cars come from?) and it is of course dangerous for all if a car is across the line in a twisting road.

It occurred at a set of lights in Newtown - he really wouldn't have slowed anyone down that much.

I just love cyclists who shoot straight through stop signs, or suddenly swerve across pedestrian crossings (when they are NOT pedestrians). And there are hundreds who do so.

When confronted by a cyclist on a pedestrian crossing, I like to miss them by as little as possible. :D

Until the day you don't.

How stupid.

I'm 15 km out of town on a twisting road and have had near misses on double lines. It means slowing to .00405 km/hour and then having to get back to speed to pass safely before the next oncoming car on a dangerous bend.

LifeMasque wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 10:32am:

I just love cyclists who shoot straight through stop signs, or suddenly swerve across pedestrian crossings (when they are NOT pedestrians). And there are hundreds who do so. When confronted by a cyclist on a pedestrian crossing, I like to miss them by as little as possible. :D

How DARE they use YOUR road!!!

I dont have anything against cyclists if they hug the curb.
But most are like 700m out and they always do it on busy as smacking roads

Don't even pretend you're old enough to drive.

A wheelbarrow is a vehicle. You could zip out in front of a cyclist and make him wait.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 10:49am:

Don't even pretend you're old enough to drive.

Sorry to be an adult I need to support the slaughter of innocent people dont I

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 10:50am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 10:49am: Don't even pretend you're old enough to drive. Sorry to be an adult I need to support the slaughter of innocent people dont I

yep.  the true measure of a man is how strongly he supports the slaughter of innocent people.

You must be in your prime, Wesley.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 10:58am:

You must be in your prime, Wesley.

You know it.  ;)

So why exactly do you think I am a child?
Is it the not believing in fairy tales?

I know you're not a child - I'm teasing. But you're very young. Early twenties at a guess.

Incorrect

Then you're either significantly above or below average in the maturity department.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 11:07am:

Then you're either significantly above or below average in the maturity department.

I do get angry at ignorance
My opinion on issues is certianly more mature then most of the people here tho

Sensitive and empathic, perhaps - not necessarily mature. You're immaturity is made obvious through your expression.

but don't worry - lots of the opinions of supposedly mature people on this forum are formed with a lack of any kind of emotional intelligence.

In any case, I am not attacking you or denying the fact that you're smart (for a kid...lol). Just making an observation.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 11:14am:

Sensitive and empathic, perhaps - not necessarily mature. You're immaturity is made obvious through your expression. but don't worry - lots of the opinions of supposedly mature people on this forum are formed with a lack of any kind of emotional intelligence. In any case, I am not attacking you or denying the fact that you're smart (for a kid...lol). Just making an observation.

Expression?

The problem with opinions of supposedly mature people on this site and in general is too much emotional 'intelligence'.
They ignore facts and evidence and base an opinion of perceived values and emotional attachments to a sense of personality behind a view. For example they stick to their ‘right’ view because they have brought up to oppose rather than evaluate. This goes for lefts as well, but there is a median.

See logic is derived when you ignore emotion and make an opinion based on facts and evidence.
This is what I do.
This takes many years of wisdom to understand that a kid could not have done

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 11:21am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 11:14am: Sensitive and empathic, perhaps - not necessarily mature. You're immaturity is made obvious through your expression. but don't worry - lots of the opinions of supposedly mature people on this forum are formed with a lack of any kind of emotional intelligence. In any case, I am not attacking you or denying the fact that you're smart (for a kid...lol). Just making an observation. Expression? The problem with opinions of supposedly mature people on this site and in general is too much emotional 'intelligence'. They ignore facts and evidence and base an opinion of perceived values and emotional attachments to a sense of personality behind a view. For example they stick to their ‘right’ view because they have brought up to oppose rather than evaluate. This goes for lefts as well, but there is a median. See logic is derived when you ignore emotion and make an opinion based on facts and evidence. This is what I do. This takes many years of wisdom to understand that a kid could not have done

LOL.

... wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 11:23am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 11:21am: Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 11:14am: Sensitive and empathic, perhaps - not necessarily mature. You're immaturity is made obvious through your expression. but don't worry - lots of the opinions of supposedly mature people on this forum are formed with a lack of any kind of emotional intelligence. In any case, I am not attacking you or denying the fact that you're smart (for a kid...lol). Just making an observation. Expression? The problem with opinions of supposedly mature people on this site and in general is too much emotional 'intelligence'. They ignore facts and evidence and base an opinion of perceived values and emotional attachments to a sense of personality behind a view. For example they stick to their ‘right’ view because they have brought up to oppose rather than evaluate. This goes for lefts as well, but there is a median. See logic is derived when you ignore emotion and make an opinion based on facts and evidence. This is what I do. This takes many years of wisdom to understand that a kid could not have done LOL.

It is true for almost every conversation that happens on this site. Most people find it impossible to defer from right to left or left to right even if they are obviously wrong.

Quote:

They ignore facts and evidence and base an opinion of perceived values and emotional attachments to a sense of personality behind a view. For example they stick to their ‘right’ view because they have brought up to oppose rather than evaluate. This goes for lefts as well, but there is a median.

Emotional intelligence depends upon the ability to understand how and why we feel the way we do. Knee jerk reactions of fear because of cultural conditioning (which is what I believe you're talking about) shows a profound lack of emotional intelligence.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 11:26am:

Quote: They ignore facts and evidence and base an opinion of perceived values and emotional attachments to a sense of personality behind a view. For example they stick to their ‘right’ view because they have brought up to oppose rather than evaluate. This goes for lefts as well, but there is a median. Emotional intelligence depends upon the ability to understand how and why we feel the way we do. Knee jerk reactions of fear because of cultural conditioning (which is what I believe you're talking about) shows a profound lack of emotional intelligence.

This is why most people here are not intelligent

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 10:59am:

So why exactly do you think I am a child? Is it the not believing in fairy tales?

it is EVERYTHING you say. you act, speak , behave and carry on exactly like a 15-16yo teenager who thinks he knows evrything but actually knows bugger-all.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 11:39am:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 10:59am: So why exactly do you think I am a child? Is it the not believing in fairy tales? it is EVERYTHING you say. you act, speak , behave and carry on exactly like a 15-16yo teenager who thinks he knows evrything but actually knows bugger-all.

I know that your religion is a fairy tale

have you noticed that a number of other people now think you are a child as well?

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:38pm:

have you noticed that a number of other people now think you are a child as well?

Have you noticed that your religion is a fairy tale?

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 11:32am:

Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 11:26am: Quote: They ignore facts and evidence and base an opinion of perceived values and emotional attachments to a sense of personality behind a view. For example they stick to their ‘right’ view because they have brought up to oppose rather than evaluate. This goes for lefts as well, but there is a median. Emotional intelligence depends upon the ability to understand how and why we feel the way we do. Knee jerk reactions of fear because of cultural conditioning (which is what I believe you're talking about) shows a profound lack of emotional intelligence. This is why most people here are not intelligent

Yiour comments has been very bad on holocaust and of terrorist attacks on children and women.
This is not maturity to be expected.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:42pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 11:32am: Annie Anthrax wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 11:26am: Quote: They ignore facts and evidence and base an opinion of perceived values and emotional attachments to a sense of personality behind a view. For example they stick to their ‘right’ view because they have brought up to oppose rather than evaluate. This goes for lefts as well, but there is a median. Emotional intelligence depends upon the ability to understand how and why we feel the way we do. Knee jerk reactions of fear because of cultural conditioning (which is what I believe you're talking about) shows a profound lack of emotional intelligence. This is why most people here are not intelligent Yiour comments has been very bad on holocaust and of terrorist attacks on children and women. This is not maturity to be expected.

ok

Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of:

- immature.
- unhinged right wing extremist.

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:47pm:

Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of: - immature. - unhinged right wing extremist.

So which one are longy,avram,progressive etc..?

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:47pm:

Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of: - immature. - unhinged right wing extremist.

This you must change to innocent civilian i think.

There is not problem in support of removal of terrorist who act to do killing of people.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:49pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:47pm: Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of: - immature. - unhinged right wing extremist. This you must change to innocent civilian i think. There is not problem in support of removal of terrorist who act to do killing of people.

There is however a problem with the classification of terrorist

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:49pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:47pm: Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of: - immature. - unhinged right wing extremist. This you must change to innocent civilian i think. There is not problem in support of removal of terrorist who act to do killing of people.

No. most definitely not.

The definition of what the difference between a "terrorist" and a "freedom fighter" is purely political.

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:48pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:47pm: Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of: - immature. - unhinged right wing extremist. So which one are longy,avram,progressive etc..?

I dont know how old they are, but I'm leaning toward the later.
;D

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:53pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:48pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:47pm: Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of: - immature. - unhinged right wing extremist. So which one are longy,avram,progressive etc..? I dont know how old they are, but I'm leaning toward the later. ;D

same

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:52pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:49pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:47pm: Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of: - immature. - unhinged right wing extremist. This you must change to innocent civilian i think. There is not problem in support of removal of terrorist who act to do killing of people. No. most definitely not. The definition of what the difference between a "terrorist" and a "freedom fighter" is purely political.

People who would blow up women and children is not anything more than terrorist - no matter what they believes and says.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:56pm:

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:52pm: Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:49pm: Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:47pm: Anyone who seeks to proclaim a desire to  injury or kill someone is usually one of: - immature. - unhinged right wing extremist. This you must change to innocent civilian i think. There is not problem in support of removal of terrorist who act to do killing of people. No. most definitely not. The definition of what the difference between a "terrorist" and a "freedom fighter" is purely political. People who would blow up women and children is not anything more than terrorist - no matter what they believes and says.

So you admit Israel are terrorists, and please dont debate this because you just said 'no matter what they believes and says'

If there is extremists who is Israeli who tries to shoot women and children then they can be called terrorist.

But please understand differences between removal of terrori threat and accident deaths of civilians compare to deliberate kill of women and children with bomb on school bus and in markets.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:59pm:

If there is extremists who is Israeli who tries to shoot women and children then they can be called terrorist. But please understand differences between removal of terrori threat and accident deaths of civilians compare to deliberate kill of women and children with bomb on school bus and in markets.

You distinctly said:

Quote:

People who would blow up women and children is not anything more than terrorist - no matter what they believes and says.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 12:59pm:

If there is extremists who is Israeli who tries to shoot women and children then they can be called terrorist. But please understand differences between removal of terrori threat and accident deaths of civilians compare to deliberate kill of women and children with bomb on school bus and in markets.

I dont want to get into a israeli debate with you, but do you justify the difference between terrorist and freedom soldier based on the weapons budget ?

Doctor Jolly wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 1:53pm:

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27th, 2012 at 12:59pm: If there is extremists who is Israeli who tries to shoot women and children then they can be called terrorist. But please understand differences between removal of terrori threat and accident deaths of civilians compare to deliberate kill of women and children with bomb on school bus and in markets. I dont want to get into a israeli debate with you, but do you justify the difference between terrorist and freedom soldier based on the weapons budget ?

Terrorist targets women and children.
That is my justification.

I had this opinion on all - nothing to do with Israel.

Any where in world this is terrorism.

We (IDF) never targets women and children.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 2:49pm:

Terrorist targets women and children. That is my justification. I had this opinion on all - nothing to do with Israel. Any where in world this is terrorism. We (IDF) never targets women and children.

i thought youre definition was "innocent civilians", now youre excluding innocent men ?

Find me a "side" that hasnt targeted innocents, and I might agree with you. But there hasnt. The US carpet bombed iraq, while only showing you footage of the laser-guided missiles.  Is the US army a terrorist ?

Ask any "terrorist" whether they would rather blow up a car bomb, or use a laser-guided missile on the leader of their target (all costs covered) and I'm sure they'd all choose the later.

a man who blow up a school bus with children on the bus in deliberate is not any more than a terrorist.

Nothing more.

I give to you definite comment that when i go into the army we is told 100% not to fire to youths without expression permission of Tel Aviv.


You can see the difference i am sure.

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 3:51pm:

a man who blow up a school bus with children on the bus in deliberate is not any more than a terrorist. Nothing more. I give to you definite comment that when i go into the army we is told 100% not to fire to youths without expression permission of Tel Aviv. You can see the difference i am sure.

But if you drop a bomb on a school bus this is ok?

Avram Horowitz wrote on Mar 27^th, 2012 at 3:51pm:

a man who blow up a school bus with children on the bus in deliberate is not any more than a terrorist. Nothing more. I give to you definite comment that when i go into the army we is told 100% not to fire to youths without expression permission of Tel Aviv. You can see the difference i am sure.

So if Tel Aviv did give the ok, you'd become an instant "Terrorist" ?


Anyway, what has this got to do with cyclists!
;D