Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Feedback >> how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325974482

Message started by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:14am

Title: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:14am
Was Abbott fagged? (Read 140 times)
Yesterday at 4:07pm

adelcrow   Offline
Gold Member
Australian Politics
everywhere

Gender:
Posts: 4606

   Given Tony Abbotts history of upper crust private schooling I wonder if he was a victim of fagging during his younger years.
That and being touched up by Catholic priests could go a long way to explaining why he's become a sociopath.


there is something depraved about this thread...and I am shocked to see who put it on the boards,...another twisted sicko....

I realize one needs an open mind in forums like this... but isnt there some form of sicko type forums out there for people of this ilk?..that find an appalling need to discuss something like this..

maybe FD needs to set up a councelling session to help those who have this type of thing on their minds..


I did report another thread I didnt think was suitable for a public forum but it was ignored..

so this time I thought I would put it out there and let the powers that be know that I do not think this is acceptable..I am no prude by any means but this is slanderous as well as sick..

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by freediver on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:38am
You left out the link.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:50am

freediver wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:38am:
You left out the link.




its on chat percept switched it from politicians suck..it should have been deleted in my opinion..and a message of decency sent to adel.

this is definitely crossing the line..

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by mantra on Jan 8th, 2012 at 10:02am
Cods although the wording might appear crude - you've got to understand that people of all ages and backgrounds post on these forums and not everyone thinks the same.

What is unacceptable to one person might be acceptable to everyone else.

The post made a genuine point. Many Catholic school boys were subject to abuse by Priests when they were children. It's been splattered all over the news for years.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 10:20am

mantra wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 10:02am:
Cods although the wording might appear crude - you've got to understand that people of all ages and backgrounds post on these forums and not everyone thinks the same.

What is unacceptable to one person might be acceptable to everyone else.

The post made a genuine point. Many Catholic school boys were subject to abuse by Priests when they were children. It's been splattered all over the news for years.




oh come on mantra......come on????????..

do you really accept tarring everyone with the same brush is the way to go????...


are you saying ALL CATHOLIC BOYS that went to a CATHOLIC school were abused?????....

because thats what you are in affect  saying...

and you are saying its okay for someone who has probably never met Abbott to say he was sexually abused because he went to a CATHOLIC school...


thats like saying all GAY people molest boys...

do you know some people do believe that????

paedophiles are all gay!!!!..


someone on here [ I will not name them] suggested Abbott was in an incestuous  relationship because he swam in the family pool with his teenage daughters..

some have put the rumour out there he is having an affair with a member of his staff..


its lousy and I for one will say so.. I will never ever defend someones right to come into a forum like this and spread filth just because they dont like someone politics..

that is so bad.. defend all you like mantra.. but dont tell me its a genuine point..unless you want to include the likes of Rudd who also happens to be Catholic..[when it suits him]

and anyone else who chooses to make spurious statements about gillard in the future.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by mantra on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:21am
You are twisting my words around Cods. I didn't say all - I said many and we all know that's true. People can speculate if they like about a politician - we all do that. Abbott could well have been a victim. Only a small portion of those who are sexually abused tell anyone or take criminal action against the perpetrator. The statistics are extremely high - 1 in 4 children that we know about are abused.

As far as badmouthing Abbott goes by some members - there has been just as much trash thrown at Gillard, if not more. It's definitely been more relentless.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by Lisa on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:23am
I will never ever defend someones right to come into a forum like this and spread filth just because they dont like someones politics..

- Cods


Best you get used to it because that is basically what you will get here.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by Lisa on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:25am

cods wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:14am:
Was Abbott fagged? (Read 140 times)
Yesterday at 4:07pm

adelcrow   Offline
Gold Member
Australian Politics
everywhere

Gender:
Posts: 4606

   Given Tony Abbotts history of upper crust private schooling I wonder if he was a victim of fagging during his younger years.
That and being touched up by Catholic priests could go a long way to explaining why he's become a sociopath.


there is something depraved about this thread...and I am shocked to see who put it on the boards,...another twisted sicko....

I realize one needs an open mind in forums like this... but isnt there some form of sicko type forums out there for people of this ilk?..that find an appalling need to discuss something like this..

maybe FD needs to set up a councelling session to help those who have this type of thing on their minds..


I did report another thread I didnt think was suitable for a public forum but it was ignored..

so this time I thought I would put it out there and let the powers that be know that I do not think this is acceptable..I am no prude by any means but this is slanderous as well as sick..


Yep .. refer to my previous post. It's good to see that like so many others .. you're slowly waking up to all this.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by pansi1951 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:31am
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the word "fagged". It simply means older students bullying younger students which mostly takes place in boarding schools.

Why is anyone outraged that we are discussing slavery within the elite schooling system?

Alan Jones was a notorious fagger. His room mates have told of the bullying and abuse that he heaped on them.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by Lisa on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:49am

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:25am:

cods wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:14am:
Was Abbott fagged? (Read 140 times)
Yesterday at 4:07pm

adelcrow   Offline
Gold Member
Australian Politics
everywhere

Gender:
Posts: 4606

   Given Tony Abbotts history of upper crust private schooling I wonder if he was a victim of fagging during his younger years.
That and being touched up by Catholic priests could go a long way to explaining why he's become a sociopath.


there is something depraved about this thread...and I am shocked to see who put it on the boards,...another twisted sicko....

I realize one needs an open mind in forums like this... but isnt there some form of sicko type forums out there for people of this ilk?..that find an appalling need to discuss something like this..

maybe FD needs to set up a councelling session to help those who have this type of thing on their minds..


I did report another thread I didnt think was suitable for a public forum but it was ignored..

so this time I thought I would put it out there and let the powers that be know that I do not think this is acceptable..I am no prude by any means but this is slanderous as well as sick..


Yep .. refer to my previous post. It's good to see that like so many others .. you're slowly waking up to all this.


Cods ... you have every right to be disgusted.

These boards have indeed sunk ... now they're below gutter level if this type of rubbish is being allowed.


http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325916456/17#17

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by Lisa on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:51am
And there's this revolting rubbish by Pansi.

Refer to my last post on that page .. 

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325974674/0

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by pansi1951 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:01pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:51am:
And there's this revolting rubbish by Pansi.

Refer to my last post on that page .. 

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325974674/0





Starting from left

Liberal voter

Labor voter

Independent voter

Greens voter

This one? I said Liberal voters are monkey's lol

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by Lisa on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:06pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:55am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:40am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 7th, 2012 at 5:02pm:
Abbott was most likely fagged and he probably went on to fag others. You can tell by the smirk ;)



Pansi, yet another one of your posts which is offensive and disgusting.

Why is it that you recurringly make such vile posts using words and in the past you have even seen fit to use revolting visuals which you've downloaded from the internet?



Barack Obama has the same smirk so maybe he did a little fagging in his school days.

Others who have the "fagged" smirk include John Howard and Alan Jones, although it is safe to say Alan took the fagging to another level.


You're out of control again Pansi.

Hopefully the Mods will be decent enough to again delete all your disgusting nonsense.

It's a pity this political forum has sunk to such a new low.

You do realise that posts and links have and are currently being forwarded to the various people you vilify and besmirch .. don't you? Has it never occurred to you that some of us actually know the people you slander? You are not doing yourself OR this site and its owner ANY favours with the revolting rubbish you seem to think is ok for you to keep spewing.


Seems you're right Cods .. this board has indeed sunk .. but to a vile level well below the gutter.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by pansi1951 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:13pm
Please familiarise yourself with the topic at hand, not your own misguided interpretation of it.
.............................................................

Fagging was a traditional educational practice in British boarding private schools (nearly all "public schools" in the English sense) and also many other boarding schools, whereby younger pupils were required to act as personal servants to the most senior boys. While domestic servants were common in family households, the custom reflected household task distribution and taught pupils about service from both ends of the relationship.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagging

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by life_goes_on on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:22pm

Quote:
It simply means older students bullying younger students which mostly takes place in boarding schools.


It means nothing of the sort. Also, it can only take place in a boarding school - and only amongst boarders. A day boy being either a fag or a fag master would be completely pointless.

It is not just bullying. You could be a fag and have a fag master who didn't bully you at all. The worst thing that ever happened to me was being hung by a rope by my feet out of a third storey window for about an hour.
At my school a boy (fag) prepared their masters clothes, shined shoes, made beds, gathered/picked up laundry and ran errands. In return you had most senior boy privileges and your master was there to handle any disputes you had with other juniors. The practice was unofficial, but condoned by the school. What it did was pass a lot of the responsibility for keeping discipline from the house masters onto the fag masters.

We knew it was known as fagging but the term was never used - it was simply a case of "boys" and "masters".


Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by Lisa on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:40pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:55am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:40am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 7th, 2012 at 5:02pm:
Abbott was most likely fagged and he probably went on to fag others. You can tell by the smirk ;)


Pansi, yet another one of your posts which is offensive and disgusting.

Why is it that you recurringly make such vile posts using words and in the past you have even seen fit to use revolting visuals which you've downloaded from the internet?



Barack Obama has the same smirk so maybe he did a little fagging in his school days.

Others who have the "fagged" smirk include John Howard and Alan Jones, although it is safe to say Alan took the fagging to another level.


You're out of control again Pansi.

Hopefully the Mods will be decent enough to again delete all your disgusting nonsense.

It's a pity this political forum has sunk to such a new low.

You do realise that posts and links have and are currently being forwarded to the various people you vilify and besmirch .. don't you? Has it never occurred to you that some of us actually know the people you slander? You are not doing yourself OR this site and its owner ANY favours with the revolting rubbish you seem to think is ok for you to keep spewing.


Seems you're right Cods .. this board has indeed sunk .. but to a vile level well below the gutter.


Life_goes_on wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:22pm:
[quote]It simply means older students bullying younger students which mostly takes place in boarding schools.


It means nothing of the sort. Also, it can only take place in a boarding school - and only amongst boarders. A day boy being either a fag or a fag master would be completely pointless.

It is not just bullying. You could be a fag and have a fag master who didn't bully you at all. The worst thing that ever happened to me was being hung by a rope by my feet out of a third storey window for about an hour.
At my school a boy (fag) prepared their masters clothes, shined shoes, made beds, gathered/picked up laundry and ran errands. In return you had most senior boy privileges and your master was there to handle any disputes you had with other juniors. The practice was unofficial, but condoned by the school. What it did was pass a lot of the responsibility for keeping discipline from the house masters onto the fag masters.

We knew it was known as fagging but the term was never used - it was simply a case of "boys" and "masters".


Of course you're right Life Goes On .. as my own 2 children have attended private boarding schools.

The fact is .. Pansi knows she has (again) crossed the line .. that is why she is trying to pathetically squirm her way out of it.

Her posts have already been forwarded to various web sites and via email to the people she has seen fit to vilify and slander.

She has done herself no favours .. and she has certainly not helped this forum's owner either. It's one thing to have a political forum well known on the internet .. but NOT for the wrong reasons.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by pansi1951 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:52pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:40pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:55am:

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:40am:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 7th, 2012 at 5:02pm:
Abbott was most likely fagged and he probably went on to fag others. You can tell by the smirk ;)


Pansi, yet another one of your posts which is offensive and disgusting.

Why is it that you recurringly make such vile posts using words and in the past you have even seen fit to use revolting visuals which you've downloaded from the internet?



Barack Obama has the same smirk so maybe he did a little fagging in his school days.

Others who have the "fagged" smirk include John Howard and Alan Jones, although it is safe to say Alan took the fagging to another level.


You're out of control again Pansi.

Hopefully the Mods will be decent enough to again delete all your disgusting nonsense.

It's a pity this political forum has sunk to such a new low.

You do realise that posts and links have and are currently being forwarded to the various people you vilify and besmirch .. don't you? Has it never occurred to you that some of us actually know the people you slander? You are not doing yourself OR this site and its owner ANY favours with the revolting rubbish you seem to think is ok for you to keep spewing.


Seems you're right Cods .. this board has indeed sunk .. but to a vile level well below the gutter.


Life_goes_on wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 12:22pm:
[quote]It simply means older students bullying younger students which mostly takes place in boarding schools.


It means nothing of the sort. Also, it can only take place in a boarding school - and only amongst boarders. A day boy being either a fag or a fag master would be completely pointless.

It is not just bullying. You could be a fag and have a fag master who didn't bully you at all. The worst thing that ever happened to me was being hung by a rope by my feet out of a third storey window for about an hour.
At my school a boy (fag) prepared their masters clothes, shined shoes, made beds, gathered/picked up laundry and ran errands. In return you had most senior boy privileges and your master was there to handle any disputes you had with other juniors. The practice was unofficial, but condoned by the school. What it did was pass a lot of the responsibility for keeping discipline from the house masters onto the fag masters.

We knew it was known as fagging but the term was never used - it was simply a case of "boys" and "masters".


Of course you're right Life Goes On .. as my own 2 children have attended private boarding schools.

The fact is .. Pansi knows she has (again) crossed the line .. that is why she is trying to pathetically squirm her way out of it.

Her posts have already been forwarded to various web sites and via email to the people she has seen fit to vilify and slander.

She has done herself no favours .. and she has certainly not helped this forum's owner either. It's one thing to have a political forum well known on the internet .. but NOT for the wrong reasons.



And your posts have been sent to the REIA, they really want to know where these properties are.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by Lisa on Jan 8th, 2012 at 1:01pm
Do not even BEGIN to attempt to threaten me online for the fact that I have exposed you for the pathetic, disgusting, malicious and slanderous creature you are Pansi.

As regards my properties and their locations .. they are none of your business. What I find interesting .. and no doubt the owner of this site and those reading this site ( and I'm not referring to the members either ) will also see .. is that you have brought the issue of my assets into this topic in some pathetic attempt to deflect and squirm your way out of your current online predicament.

You seriously ought to reconsider your online conduct Pansi. The more you post.. the more evidence you provide for getting yourself and this forum's owner into trouble.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by pansi1951 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 1:16pm


Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by mantra on Jan 8th, 2012 at 1:31pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 1:16pm:


Pansi you should have reported the posts. No global moderator will accept stalking.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325916456/27#27

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by Lisa on Jan 8th, 2012 at 1:40pm
Pansi .. your posts over the past 24 hrs have been reported and forwarded onto authorities much higher than the part time mods and lax forum owner of Oz Politic. The people you have seen fit to attack have also been contacted. Do you not realise that is what happens when you post slander on the www??

Tis high time you took ownership for the offtopic, irrelevant, malicious, vile and offensive rubbish you post. And that is ALL you post nowadays for some unknown reason. You are your worst enemy esp in providing so much evidence for others to use against you and this site's owner.

Ok .. you may as well continue to sit there and waste the rest of your Sunday. It matters little to me. I've got much better things to do.

Enjoy!

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by pansi1951 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 1:45pm
<<Pansi you should have reported the posts. No global moderator will accept stalking.>>
......................................................

Thanks mantra

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 2:11pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:25am:

cods wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:14am:
Was Abbott fagged? (Read 140 times)
Yesterday at 4:07pm

adelcrow   Offline
Gold Member
Australian Politics
everywhere

Gender:
Posts: 4606

   Given Tony Abbotts history of upper crust private schooling I wonder if he was a victim of fagging during his younger years.
That and being touched up by Catholic priests could go a long way to explaining why he's become a sociopath.


there is something depraved about this thread...and I am shocked to see who put it on the boards,...another twisted sicko....

I realize one needs an open mind in forums like this... but isnt there some form of sicko type forums out there for people of this ilk?..that find an appalling need to discuss something like this..

maybe FD needs to set up a councelling session to help those who have this type of thing on their minds..


I did report another thread I didnt think was suitable for a public forum but it was ignored..

so this time I thought I would put it out there and let the powers that be know that I do not think this is acceptable..I am no prude by any means but this is slanderous as well as sick..


Yep .. refer to my previous post. It's good to see that like so many others .. you're slowly waking up to all this.




no sorry I disagree I dont find that at all..certainly I have had my share of crap thrown at me all because someone didnt like me..I have probably had a go back as well..

but not to this extent.. and I dont care what mantra say.. it does TAR everyone with the same brush... look at the .. ALL LIBERALS or ALL LEFTY

statements on here..this is what i am talking about..

and to suggest this out of the blue for no other reason than to taint someone is despicable.

sorry but I havent seen even gillard stoop this low.

and to say its the norm for on here doesnt do you any service at all lisa...you are a member here and believe me... if for one moment I thought this WAS/IS the norm I would not be within cooee of this forum. thats for sure.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by pansi1951 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 2:18pm
cods....what exactly are you offended about?

fagging does not mean they are faggots (slang for homosexual) which has an entirely different meaning.

Are you confusing the two words?

I cannot see any reason for outrage. Most men who went to elite boarding schools were most likely  associated with the practice in one way or another. They would have at least known about it, even if not personally involved.


Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by freediver on Jan 8th, 2012 at 2:25pm
I boarded for a while but never encountered this practice. The staff just gave authority to the seniors.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 2:34pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 2:18pm:
cods....what exactly are you offended about?

fagging does not mean they are faggots (slang for homosexual) which has an entirely different meaning.

Are you confusing the two words?

I cannot see any reason for outrage. Most men who went to elite boarding schools were most likely  associated with the practice in one way or another. They would have at least known about it, even if not personally involved.




no pansi I am not.. TOUCHING UP..are you really saying its ok for people to assume that this went on because he went to a Catholic School..

and therefore its ok to suggest that the man is a sociopath because of it..

ok I am wrong and after all adel is a lefty so let them run with it..we have every right to make up stories like this no matter how bad they are.. fair enough..

I find it interesting that all the lefties come out and attack me...adel is probably laughing himself stupid..

anyway back to Abbott bashing..I wont bother about it again.


and yes I do know what fagging means pansi.. and dont need to look it up thank you

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by life_goes_on on Jan 8th, 2012 at 2:42pm

freediver wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 2:25pm:
I boarded for a while but never encountered this practice. The staff just gave authority to the seniors.


Very few schools still had it when I was going to boarding school in the 1970s.
A friend of mines son went to my former school during the 1990s and it wasn't happening then.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by gizmo_2655 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 4:35pm

mantra wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 10:02am:
Cods although the wording might appear crude - you've got to understand that people of all ages and backgrounds post on these forums and not everyone thinks the same.

What is unacceptable to one person might be acceptable to everyone else.

The post made a genuine point. Many Catholic school boys were subject to abuse by Priests when they were children. It's been splattered all over the news for years.


No, Some, not many.....the whole thing is blown way out of reality...The sad truth is, most children who ARE molested, are molested by a family member...

The fastest way to decide the truth from fiction in the Catholic accusations is this...is the accused priest/clergy member still alive???
The Church, like Mcdonalds has a reputation as a 'soft touch'.....they'll pay up to stop the stories...

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by gizmo_2655 on Jan 8th, 2012 at 4:37pm

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:31am:
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the word "fagged". It simply means older students bullying younger students which mostly takes place in boarding schools.


And in this instance, it's very unlikely....since Abbott wasn't a boarder...he was a day student..

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by skippy. on Jan 8th, 2012 at 4:50pm
You do realise that posts and links have and are currently being forwarded to the various people you vilify and besmirch
Oh sooooooooooo funny, I cant wait to see phony tony say"I did not have sexual relations with that priest'. ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 5:56pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 4:37pm:

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 11:31am:
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the word "fagged". It simply means older students bullying younger students which mostly takes place in boarding schools.


And in this instance, it's very unlikely....since Abbott wasn't a boarder...he was a day student..




so why does someone sink so low to suggest it? this is what bugs me..pick on someone for their politics for sure..even the way he/she  looks because they are ready for that its par for the c ourse... but this to me is lousy..
and all because he is a Catholic..and a Liberal. it makes it even more pathetic. or sad or something..

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by mantra on Jan 8th, 2012 at 7:05pm
I understand how you feel. I feel the same way when the homophobic righties pick on Bob Brown because he's gay and make the most disgusting and sleazy suggestions about his sexual activities.

Have you noticed these comments about Senator Brown Cods and if so, do you believe the homophobes are entitled to their opinion, no matter how revolting it is?

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 7:58pm

mantra wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 7:05pm:
I understand how you feel. I feel the same way when the homophobic righties pick on Bob Brown because he's gay and make the most disgusting and sleazy suggestions about his sexual activities.

Have you noticed these comments about Senator Brown Cods and if so, do you believe the homophobes are entitled to their opinion, no matter how revolting it is?




NO MANTRA AS A MATTER OF FACT I HAVENT NOTICE MUST BE LUCKY I GUESS..


I HAVE SEEN ONE OR TWO RIGHTIES HAVE SOMETHING DREADFUL TO SAY ABOUT GILLARD...in one case wishing her dead i believe..

AND GUESS WHAT I HAD A GO AT HIM.. RIGHT ON THE BOARDS.. NOT IN PRIVATE.. I TOLD HIM WHAT FOR..

I HAVE NEVER SEEN A LEFTY DO THAT..they just go looking for sleaze as payback.

.AS HAS BEEN POINTED OUT I HAVE HAD THE DEATH WISH PUT ON ME..JUST BECAUSE I AM NOT A GREEN SLAVE..YES ALL OLDIES SHOULD DIE AND LEAVE THE WORLD TO THE GREENS..


AND ANOTHER GUESS WHAT!!!!

I DIDNT SEE ONE, PERSON COME OUT AND TELL THAT POSTER... NOT NICE BOY. >:(

SO YES MANTRA i THINK i CAN SAFELY SAY I HAVE COME OUT AND PROTESTED.. ABOUT WHATS SAID..BY RIGHTIES.. AND IF I SAW WHERE I FELT IT WAS WRONG ABOUT BROWN I WOULD DO SO FOR SURE..


have YOU protested  about a lefties response????.. as I havent seen that either.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 7:59pm
perhaps you can give me an example of said revolting comments..

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by mozzaok on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:06pm

Quote:
I understand how you feel. I feel the same way when the homophobic righties pick on Bob Brown because he's gay and make the most disgusting and sleazy suggestions about his sexual activities.

Have you noticed these comments about Senator Brown Cods and if so, do you believe the homophobes are entitled to their opinion, no matter how revolting it is?
-Mantra


Excellent points there Mantra.
While the OP may have been a bit tacky, I certainly would not put it in the same class as the disgusting posts made about Gillard and Brown, by the loony right, and have not seen a single word of outrage against those posts, by the people here who have decided to take personal affront, on Abbott's behalf, for the tasteless speculation by some members in this thread.

If people displayed the same moral outrage about any posts which may be taken as a personal slur, about pollies they do not support, or actively dislike, then there is a chance they may be considered as really believing that All people should be treated with due  deference, and the same courtesy they would wish for themselves.
However, as I have not seen that level of equability, I once more must conclude, that people are making a claimed ethical stance, based primarily along party lines.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by bomen_guy on Jan 8th, 2012 at 9:45pm
cods you were going on about the thread about Abbott being fagged but noting about this thread

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325921561

It just goes to show how one eyed you are.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 9:56pm

bomen_guy wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 9:45pm:
cods you were going on about the thread about Abbott being fagged but noting about this thread

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325921561

It just goes to show how one eyed you are.




REALLY

i take it you didnt read my remarks to BA....and btw I wrote him a personal message on the subject..as unfortunately I didnt read his response until after I had posted  this thread...


as it is you can see I believe that I did post my thoughts on it.. and I let him have it on pm..

its okay though you lefties support your own.. and for moss to claim no one stops the right from making derogatory remarks.. lets hear it WHOM ARE YOU REFERRING TOO.. and what are you referring too..


you seem horrified.. yet having already requested some information very little has arrived so far.. just slag off at myself..

come on show me a lefty thats had a go at another lefty?????


all I ever see is support no matter how bad it is.. like this one for starters the usual suspects come out finding faults with ME.. but never their own..

you make me laugh you really do..

I will prove a point in future when I have a shot at someone I will start a thread on it..then you wont be able to point your fingers and make claims that are not true..

where are you BA????... you can verify what I am saying..as its been you of late that has copped the tongue lashing from myself..

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 8th, 2012 at 9:59pm

cods   Online
Gold Member
Australian Politics

Posts: 10708

    another sorry thread what the hell is wrong with all you people???..perverts thats the only word I can think of... disgusting is another.   Back to top



my response to Blackadders gillard thread... just in case you didnt read down that far..bomen

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by mozzaok on Jan 8th, 2012 at 10:20pm
I will verify that Cods was critical of the lowlife attacks against the PM, Ms Gillard, made by Blackadder and Adelcrow, as was Lisa, and I apologise to both of them for thinking that they were only getting upset about the equally lowlife slurs about Abbott's catholic education, because they support him, I was wrong to jump to that conclusion.

These extremely silly threads are moved to 'Extremism Exposed", where they deserve to die from lack of oxygen, by having our sensible members just ignore the lowlifes who start them.
Leaving them there, rather than just deleting them is a judgement call which is made in the interest of free speech, as well as highlighting just how loony, as well as morally bankrupt, some people can become, when they decide to dwell on the fringes of decency and sanity, and it is good that more responsible, sensible members can see just what sort of lows, some members are willing to sink to.
Sometimes it is just a case of someone having a "bad day", and making a silly decision when not thinking clearly, and for others, it is just reinforcement for the view that everything they say or do, is worth ignoring, because nary a sane or decent tought is likely to come from them.

Now whether or not that means they should be banned, is dependent upon just how vulgar or repugnant their stated views become, and just because they have not reached that point od being banned, yet, does not mean they are not already well down the road towards it.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by blackadder on Jan 9th, 2012 at 6:32am
Now whether or not that means they should be banned, is dependent upon just how vulgar or repugnant their stated views become, and just because they have not reached that point od being banned, yet, does not mean they are not already well down the road towards it.


You would ban adelcrow?? Pfftt, as if.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by blackadder on Jan 9th, 2012 at 7:21am

bomen_guy wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 9:45pm:
cods you were going on about the thread about Abbott being fagged but noting about this thread

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325921561

It just goes to show how one eyed you are.



Oh dear. Caught out again bomen. Life must be a bitch for you.

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 9th, 2012 at 8:37am

mozzaok wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 10:20pm:
I will verify that Cods was critical of the lowlife attacks against the PM, Ms Gillard, made by Blackadder and Adelcrow, as was Lisa, and I apologise to both of them for thinking that they were only getting upset about the equally lowlife slurs about Abbott's catholic education, because they support him, I was wrong to jump to that conclusion.

These extremely silly threads are moved to 'Extremism Exposed", where they deserve to die from lack of oxygen, by having our sensible members just ignore the lowlifes who start them.
Leaving them there, rather than just deleting them is a judgement call which is made in the interest of free speech, as well as highlighting just how loony, as well as morally bankrupt, some people can become, when they decide to dwell on the fringes of decency and sanity, and it is good that more responsible, sensible members can see just what sort of lows, some members are willing to sink to.
Sometimes it is just a case of someone having a "bad day", and making a silly decision when not thinking clearly, and for others, it is just reinforcement for the view that everything they say or do, is worth ignoring, because nary a sane or decent tought is likely to come from them.

Now whether or not that means they should be banned, is dependent upon just how vulgar or repugnant their stated views become, and just because they have not reached that point od being banned, yet, does not mean they are not already well down the road towards it.




thank you for that apology  you will learn over time mozz that i dont tell lies..when I say I have done something its because I have..

and nothing puts my back up more than being accused of lying..I HATE LIARS.

why should they be banned.. thats a bit over the top... BA retaliated and I think that obvious dont you?.. silly but obvious.. adel went over the LINE and should be told thats not on..

like using bad language to making  these suggestions is no different..

I am the one making the fuss... and I say no to banning..I think adel has been shown up and that should be enough... and I trust BA wont go down that path again... I am watching you BA... ;D

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by cods on Jan 9th, 2012 at 8:38am

blackadder wrote on Jan 9th, 2012 at 7:21am:

bomen_guy wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 9:45pm:
cods you were going on about the thread about Abbott being fagged but noting about this thread

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325921561

It just goes to show how one eyed you are.



Oh dear. Caught out again bomen. Life must be a bitch for you.





will I hold my breath for an apology from bomen,,,

;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: how low are you going to allow the boards to sink?
Post by bomen_guy on Jan 9th, 2012 at 11:45am

cods wrote on Jan 9th, 2012 at 8:38am:

blackadder wrote on Jan 9th, 2012 at 7:21am:

bomen_guy wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 9:45pm:
cods you were going on about the thread about Abbott being fagged but noting about this thread

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325921561

It just goes to show how one eyed you are.



Oh dear. Caught out again bomen. Life must be a bitch for you.





will I hold my breath for an apology from bomen,,,

;D ;D ;D ;D



I will stand by my post that you are one eyed cods.

This is the only thing you posted in adelcrow thread Was Abbott Fagged


cods wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 2:27pm:
sorry pansi... but yes any decent person knows what the word fagged means when it was in use during the last century...


READ ADELS op.. i THINK ITS PRETTY PLAIN WHEN HE TALKS ABOUT BEING "TOUCHED UP"...

and suggesting he is psycho....because he went to  a CAtholic school is monstrous.

if Abbott had gone to a muslim school adel wouldnt dare use that as a cowardly weapon and you know it.




Given Tony Abbotts history of upper crust private schooling I wonder if he was a victim of fagging during his younger years.
That and being touched up by Catholic priests could go a long way to explaining why he's become a sociopath.




http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325916457

You didn't have a go at him in the thread like you did with blackadder. Why is that?

I know what you wrote in blackadder thread Was Gillard bonked


cods wrote on Jan 8th, 2012 at 8:35am:
another sorry thread what the hell is wrong with all you people???..perverts thats the only word I can think of... disgusting is another.


http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1325921561

Yet you made a bit song and dance about adelcrow thread by starting a new thread. Why didn't you have a go at both of them in this thread?

If I see any post about Gillard or Brown sexual perference from now on and you don't complain about them on the freeback board, not by sending a PM to the member or the mods, but on here then we will all know that you are one eyed.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.