Sydney/NSW
November coup plotted on Julia Gillard - pressure on Kevin Rudd to push The Daily Telegraph
KEVIN Rudd is being urged by key backers within the Labor Party to challenge Julia Gillard for the leadership as early as this month.
Labor figures behind the push for the former PM to take back the job he was removed from last June have confirmed he was now being advised by his closest confidants not to wait until next year but to launch a challenge as early as the second last week of November.

Senior sources within the NSW Right claim the leakage of support away from Ms Gillard, who flew out to France last night for the G20 leaders' meeting, was snowballing.

"There are three things that are certain: there is a leadership challenge under way, Rudd doesn't have a majority yet but has enough numbers to be a contender, and they are strategising about how to get it done," said a senior NSW right-wing source.


But there was mixed support for the idea of an early move, with some MPs claiming they would "deliver the leadership" to Mr Rudd in February - if he waited.

In a sign the PM is now taking seriously the threat of a challenge, an internal counter-offensive has been launched to shore up her leadership.

The PM is reported over the past week to have lobbied key affiliated union officials with influence over caucus members to stick with her. Treasurer Wayne Swan is also believed to have privately warned several NSW Labor colleagues that he would resign if they supported a move to return Mr Rudd as leader.

The Daily Telegraph revealed two weeks ago that federal NSW Right MPs were softening in their support for Ms Gillard following the bungled Malaysia asylum seeker deal and their deepening concerns about the PM's poker machine reform deal with independent Andrew Wilkie.

Should Gillard be replaced with Rudd? Tell us below

"It sent Gillard and Swan's office into a panic. Swan has told people that he would quit if we went to Rudd but I doubt he was serious. He wouldn't want to be remembered as the bloke that brought down a Labor government," a senior member of the NSW right said.

Mr Swan would not comment last night.

Parliament has only one sitting week left after this week, during which a full meeting of the Labor caucus - required for a ballot - could be held. The next opportunity would not come until February when parliament returns from the summer break.

Sources close to Mr Rudd said he was well advanced on a policy pitch to address Labor's desperate electoral problems over issues including asylum seekers, the carbon tax and problem gambling.

One senior Labor figure, a Rudd supporter, claimed business was starting to "get edgy" over the government's unresolved leadership crisis.

"Business knows it's a question of when and want it sorted," they said.

Despite Mr Rudd's commanding public popularity, a boost in support for the government if Ms Gillard was rolled was not assured. Secret Coalition research conducted recently concluded voters believed the country was drifting.

Voters believe Labor's policies were out of synch with mainstream values, targeting key policy areas including the carbon tax and asylum seeker policy. They also expressed concern at the influence of the so-called faceless men.



and shes left the country... my god shes game..

Imagine the ramblings going on while that thing is no-where in ear shot. Oh how I would love to be a fly on the wall.

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 7:11am:

Imagine the ramblings going on while that thing is no-where in ear shot. Oh how I would love to be a fly on the wall.

sitting here in my little suburb in ACt you can hear the knives being sharpened...lol..at first we thought it was frogs..but now we know..

they are in the batcave honing their swords..

cods wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 7:13am:

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:11am: Imagine the ramblings going on while that thing is no-where in ear shot. Oh how I would love to be a fly on the wall. sitting here in my little suburb in ACt you can hear the knives being sharpened...lol..at first we thought it was frogs..but now we know.. they are in the batcave honing their swords..

lol you sound way too close to all those nutters. Rudd has a fresh sharp knife in his back, he could contribute quite quickly.

progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 7:24am:

cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:13am: progressiveslol wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:11am: Imagine the ramblings going on while that thing is no-where in ear shot. Oh how I would love to be a fly on the wall. sitting here in my little suburb in ACt you can hear the knives being sharpened...lol..at first we thought it was frogs..but now we know.. they are in the batcave honing their swords.. lol you sound way too close to all those nutters. Rudd has a fresh sharp knife in his back, he could contribute quite quickly.

shes out of town dont forget..poo does that mean swanny is in charge...maybe two knives needed prog..lol

Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he.
Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite.

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 7:38am:

Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite.

Rudd is the cause of many (if not all) of the problems that plague Labor in Canberra. I can't understand why they'd go back to him. It's a bit like a soccer coach removing a goal keeper who lets in 7 goals only to bring him back on for the second half. It makes no sense whatsoever to bring back Rudd.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 9:34am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:38am: Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite. Rudd is the cause of many (if not all) of the problems that plague Labor in Canberra. I can't understand why they'd go back to him. It's a bit like a soccer coach removing a goal keeper who lets in 7 goals only to bring him back on for the second half. It makes no sense whatsoever to bring back Rudd.

Thats your opinion, it may well be true, but that doesn't change the fact Rudd has in every poll taken been the preferred PM over both Abbott and Gillard and Turnbull. The fact the right try to put him down so much just shows they can see the "precious" slipping from their grip if Rudd is returned.

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 9:41am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:34am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:38am: Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite. Rudd is the cause of many (if not all) of the problems that plague Labor in Canberra. I can't understand why they'd go back to him. It's a bit like a soccer coach removing a goal keeper who lets in 7 goals only to bring him back on for the second half. It makes no sense whatsoever to bring back Rudd. Thats your opinion, it may well be true, but that doesn't change the fact Rudd has in every poll taken been the preferred PM over both Abbott and Gillard and Turnbull. The fact the right try to put him down so much just shows they can see the "precious" slipping from their grip if Rudd is returned.

Have you (and his other supporters) forgotten how dismally he polled in the dying stages of his Prime Ministership??? Whitlam could have polled better.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 9:49am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:41am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:34am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:38am: Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite. Rudd is the cause of many (if not all) of the problems that plague Labor in Canberra. I can't understand why they'd go back to him. It's a bit like a soccer coach removing a goal keeper who lets in 7 goals only to bring him back on for the second half. It makes no sense whatsoever to bring back Rudd. Thats your opinion, it may well be true, but that doesn't change the fact Rudd has in every poll taken been the preferred PM over both Abbott and Gillard and Turnbull. The fact the right try to put him down so much just shows they can see the "precious" slipping from their grip if Rudd is returned. Have you (and his other supporters) forgotten how dismally he polled in the dying stages of his Prime Ministership??? Whitlam could have polled better.

LOL those so called "dismall poll figures" were still higher than Abbotts. ;D ;D ;D I know you're afraid, because this could well put the spot light back on Abbott,and so it should. Abbott is not good for this country and he does not deserve to slide into the lodge by default. You continually make the mistake of assuming I'm a Labor supporter, I'm not ,if the Libs had a decent leader I'd support them, but Abbott is not decent nor a leader, he's an attack dog reactionist who has proven to be the most effective opposition leader I have seen.I hope Labors move to dump Gillard will have a flow on effect and the Libs will dump Abbott, but if they dont I will support Rudd at the next election, as will many others who could never accept a loony like Abbott as PM.

I don't think that anyone (other than Rudd himself) really wants Rudd back at the helm of the ALP - or the nation - perhaps the Libs are more concerned about this prospect than the Labs are!?

As for the Leadership of the Liberal Party: I suggest that you right whingers start listening to the underlying concerns being revealed by Tony Abbott's projections - it is he who is worrying about the security of his own leadership and the standing of his own policies in the eyes of both the Coalition's financial backers and the broader voting public!

With the infinitely-more statesmanlike Turnbull looking more the proper leader of the Liberal Party every day, Tony Abbott and his fellow religious righteous Liberal powermongers are keen to distract the public attention from their own internal party woes!

Moreover, it is pure nonsense for any pollster to seek public opinion, as to the preferred leader of only one of the 2 major parties - especially in the context that Abbott ascended by a margin of 1 single vote!

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:13am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:49am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:41am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:34am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:38am: Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite. Rudd is the cause of many (if not all) of the problems that plague Labor in Canberra. I can't understand why they'd go back to him. It's a bit like a soccer coach removing a goal keeper who lets in 7 goals only to bring him back on for the second half. It makes no sense whatsoever to bring back Rudd. Thats your opinion, it may well be true, but that doesn't change the fact Rudd has in every poll taken been the preferred PM over both Abbott and Gillard and Turnbull. The fact the right try to put him down so much just shows they can see the "precious" slipping from their grip if Rudd is returned. Have you (and his other supporters) forgotten how dismally he polled in the dying stages of his Prime Ministership??? Whitlam could have polled better. LOL those so called "dismall poll figures" were still higher than Abbotts. ;D ;D ;D I know you're afraid, because this could well put the spot light back on Abbott,and so it should. Abbott is not good for this country and he does not deserve to slide into the lodge by default. You continually make the mistake of assuming I'm a Labor supporter, I'm not ,if the Libs had a decent leader I'd support them, but Abbott is not decent nor a leader, he's an attack dog reactionist who has proven to be the most effective opposition leader I have seen.I hope Labors move to dump Gillard will have a flow on effect and the Libs will dump Abbott, but if they dont I will support Rudd at the next election, as will many others who could never accept a loony like Abbott as PM.

I have a feeling you are going to be unpleasantly suprised at the next election!  ;)

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:13am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:49am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:41am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:34am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:38am: Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite. Rudd is the cause of many (if not all) of the problems that plague Labor in Canberra. I can't understand why they'd go back to him. It's a bit like a soccer coach removing a goal keeper who lets in 7 goals only to bring him back on for the second half. It makes no sense whatsoever to bring back Rudd. Thats your opinion, it may well be true, but that doesn't change the fact Rudd has in every poll taken been the preferred PM over both Abbott and Gillard and Turnbull. The fact the right try to put him down so much just shows they can see the "precious" slipping from their grip if Rudd is returned. Have you (and his other supporters) forgotten how dismally he polled in the dying stages of his Prime Ministership??? Whitlam could have polled better. LOL those so called "dismall poll figures" were still higher than Abbotts. ;D ;D ;D I know you're afraid, because this could well put the spot light back on Abbott,and so it should. Abbott is not good for this country and he does not deserve to slide into the lodge by default. You continually make the mistake of assuming I'm a Labor supporter, I'm not ,if the Libs had a decent leader I'd support them, but Abbott is not decent nor a leader, he's an attack dog reactionist who has proven to be the most effective opposition leader I have seen.I hope Labors move to dump Gillard will have a flow on effect and the Libs will dump Abbott, but if they dont I will support Rudd at the next election, as will many others who could never accept a loony like Abbott as PM.

At the end, Rudd was polling below 40% while Abbott was polling close to 50%. Don't know where you're getting your flimsy numbers from...

Hang in there Ms Gillard don't be fooled by fools.

wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:43am:

Hang in there Ms Gillard don't be fooled by fools.

Personally, I hope she is not removed. I want her to be PM at the next election so I can have the joy of joining millions of others in voting her and her incompetent government out of office!  ;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:39am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 10:13am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:49am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:41am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:34am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:38am: Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite. Rudd is the cause of many (if not all) of the problems that plague Labor in Canberra. I can't understand why they'd go back to him. It's a bit like a soccer coach removing a goal keeper who lets in 7 goals only to bring him back on for the second half. It makes no sense whatsoever to bring back Rudd. Thats your opinion, it may well be true, but that doesn't change the fact Rudd has in every poll taken been the preferred PM over both Abbott and Gillard and Turnbull. The fact the right try to put him down so much just shows they can see the "precious" slipping from their grip if Rudd is returned. Have you (and his other supporters) forgotten how dismally he polled in the dying stages of his Prime Ministership??? Whitlam could have polled better. LOL those so called "dismall poll figures" were still higher than Abbotts. ;D ;D ;D I know you're afraid, because this could well put the spot light back on Abbott,and so it should. Abbott is not good for this country and he does not deserve to slide into the lodge by default. You continually make the mistake of assuming I'm a Labor supporter, I'm not ,if the Libs had a decent leader I'd support them, but Abbott is not decent nor a leader, he's an attack dog reactionist who has proven to be the most effective opposition leader I have seen.I hope Labors move to dump Gillard will have a flow on effect and the Libs will dump Abbott, but if they dont I will support Rudd at the next election, as will many others who could never accept a loony like Abbott as PM. At the end, Rudd was polling below 40% while Abbott was polling close to 50%. Don't know where you're getting your flimsy numbers from...

and no one want to concentrate on gillard and her figurers  I find it really funny that the lab supporters on her almost never mention her name.. yet Tony is mentioned every post.. its laughable really ..

did anyone see the repeat of the repeat of this Lohan pest in America this morning appearing for about the 100 time in court..for violations about her probation conditions....I dont think I have a clue what this woman is famous for.. but I am sure all this is for publicity it cant be for anything else...unless its her playboy appearance. of course.

however as the saying goes any attention is better than being ignored... which brings me back to all the attention Tony receives.. and our stupid PM.. doesnt..did anyone see her leave the country? I know I didnt...lol.. can you imagine rudd as PM leaving without the cameras...it wouldnt happen..media harlot that he is.

"Bloody Hell it's a slow news day today, Boss, KK's not talking about her divorce, we did the refo beat up last week & considering a few of the scum drowned maybe we should lay off until next week "

"I know let's go with Gillards overthrow, no proof needed, unnamed sources everyone hates her no one will question"

At the end, Rudd was polling below 40% while Abbott was polling close to 50%. Don't know where you're getting your flimsy numbers from...
EVIDENCE??????????????????
Because as far as I remember Abbott never polled higher than Rudd as preferred PM, post up your numbers to prove yourself correct.

Personally, I hope she is not removed.
Of course you do,so does Abbortt. Thats why its the best thing to do.

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:51am:

At the end, Rudd was polling below 40% while Abbott was polling close to 50%. Don't know where you're getting your flimsy numbers from... EVIDENCE?????????????????? Because as far as I remember Abbott never polled higher than Rudd as preferred PM, post up your numbers to prove yourself correct.

Rudd was at 39% approval, Abbott 45% approval. Fifty percent disapproval for Rudd, only 43% for Abbott...

http://www.newspoll.com.au/image_uploads/100705%20Federal%20Voting%20Intention%20&%20Leaders%20Ratings.pdf

I don't think it will matter all that much who is in the top seat in either party come election day. Everyone (almost) knows they are both infested with the same crapola. Both major parties should be concerned about the greens and the independents, or with the state of the country if they want to get serious.

It will be much of the same as last time, people trying to get around voting for the two major parties, either by invalid votes or not fronting up to the polling booth.

Has anyone heard or know of anyone who actually copped a fine for not voting in the last federal election?

I know people who didn't vote and they haven't got their fine yet.....still waiting! ho hum

Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:57am:

I don't think it will matter all that much who is in the top seat in either party come election day. Everyone (almost) knows they are both infested with the same crapola. Both major parties should be concerned about the greens and the independents, or with the state of the country if they want to get serious. It will be much of the same as last time, people trying to get around voting for the two major parties, either by invalid votes or not fronting up to the polling booth. Has anyone heard or know of anyone who actually copped a fine for not voting in the last federal election? I know people who didn't vote and they haven't got their fine yet.....still waiting! ho hum

Given the way Independents such as Oakeshott and Windsor screwed their electorates, I'd be suprised if any Independent candidate does very well at the next election. As for the Greens, there's a lot of burning hatred out there for these idiots who want to force this ridiculous carbon tax upon us all, making our cost of living increase.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:56am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 10:51am: At the end, Rudd was polling below 40% while Abbott was polling close to 50%. Don't know where you're getting your flimsy numbers from... EVIDENCE?????????????????? Because as far as I remember Abbott never polled higher than Rudd as preferred PM, post up your numbers to prove yourself correct. Rudd was at 39% approval, Abbott 45% approval. Fifty percent disapproval for Rudd, only 43% for Abbott... http://www.newspoll.com.au/image_uploads/100705%20Federal%20Voting%20Intention%20&%20Leaders%20Ratings.pdf

I was right wasn't I?
the last poll taken with RUDD as Pm had Labor ahead
55% to libs 45%
AND Rudd AHEAD OF ABBOTT AS PREFERRED PM
46% TO 37%

Why did you not post up those numbers?? oh thats right they prove me correct and you wrong, thanks. ;D ;D ;D

So Rudd was kicking Abbotts ass so was Labor,interesting hey?

"another article or headline wasted when decent journalism could have been crafted…"  

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:56am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 10:51am: At the end, Rudd was polling below 40% while Abbott was polling close to 50%. Don't know where you're getting your flimsy numbers from... EVIDENCE?????????????????? Because as far as I remember Abbott never polled higher than Rudd as preferred PM, post up your numbers to prove yourself correct. Rudd was at 39% approval, Abbott 45% approval. Fifty percent disapproval for Rudd, only 43% for Abbott... http://www.newspoll.com.au/image_uploads/100705%20Federal%20Voting%20Intention%20&%20Leaders%20Ratings.pdf

You were saying (check attached details from the same NewsPoll link)...

---

You'd have made less of a goose of yourself if you'd just shut your mouth, armchair, I couldn't be bothered checking the figures and all you've done if highlight how Rudd was kicking Abbotts butt. ;D ;D ;D
I had no idea Rudd and Labor were so far ahead of the Libs in that last poll with Rudd as PM, thanks for that. ;D ;D ;D At least it puts to bed the lies people here try to spin about Abbott out doing Rudd. ;D ;D ;D

Dilemna Time ...


http://mollymediastudios.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/jfa2428l.jpg?w=369&h=400



So who would the capitalist and Christian-Right sectors PREFER as Federal Labor leader ?


The female athiest, who would most likely be defeated at the 2013 Federal Election ?

Or the *former Prime Minister - and Christian - who internal polling shows would have a FAR greater chance of winning in 2013 ?




*( ... as well as being preffered PM over both Gillard and Abbott)  

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 11:21am:

You'd have made less of a goose of yourself if you'd just shut your mouth, armchair, I couldn't be bothered checking the figures and all you've done if highlight how Rudd was kicking Abbotts butt. ;D ;D ;D I had no idea Rudd and Labor were so far ahead of the Libs in that last poll with Rudd as PM, thanks for that. ;D ;D ;D At least it puts to bed the lies people here try to spin about Abbott out doing Rudd. ;D ;D ;D

LOL, exposure on issues like this serves to highlight how much most right whingers tend to exaggerate in their own minds those things that they strongly agree or disagree with - and how out of touch they are with the goings on in the real-world...

Equitist wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 11:36am:

skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 11:21am: You'd have made less of a goose of yourself if you'd just shut your mouth, armchair, I couldn't be bothered checking the figures and all you've done if highlight how Rudd was kicking Abbotts butt. ;D ;D ;D I had no idea Rudd and Labor were so far ahead of the Libs in that last poll with Rudd as PM, thanks for that. ;D ;D ;D At least it puts to bed the lies people here try to spin about Abbott out doing Rudd. ;D ;D ;D LOL, exposure on issues like this serves to highlight how much most right whingers tend to exaggerate in their own minds those things that they strongly agree or disagree with - and how out of touch they are with the goings on in the real-world...

LOL so true, in fact I believe that armchair really believed the propaganda that Abbott was ahead of Rudd and thats why he went out to find that poll, the funny thing is even when he posted it up he still tried to put a positive spin on it even though Rudd was well ahead of Abbott as preferred PM and Labor were belting the Libs 55/45 TPP, sooo funny.
Well at least we can now put to bed the lie that Abbott bettered Rudd, and the best thing of all is it was a News Lmd poll that proved all the rightards wrong. How sweet it is. ;D ;D ;D

http://www.pizazzbeads.com/xcart/images/dilemma.jpg






buzzanddidj wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 11:28am:

Dilemna Time ... So who would the capitalist and Christian-Right sectors PREFER as Federal Labor leader ? The female athiest, who would most likely be defeated at the 2013 Federal Election ? Or the *former Prime Minister - and Christian - who internal polling shows would have a FAR greater chance of winning in 2013 ? *( ... as well as being preffered PM over both Gillard and Abbott)

Bearing in MIND ...




Labor would win with Rudd as leader: poll
September 12, 2011

A new opinion poll suggests former prime minister Kevin Rudd could lead Labor to victory if a federal election was held today.

The latest Nielsen Poll published in today's Fairfax broadsheets says Labor's primary vote would jump from its current low level of 27 per cent to 42 per cent if the party brought Mr Rudd back as leader.

Labor would be ahead of the Coalition on the two-party preferred vote by four points, with a jump to 52 per cent.

But under Julia Gillard the poll shows no change for Labor since last month, with the Coalition ahead 58 per cent to 42 per cent in two-party standings



http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-09-12/labor-would-win-with-rudd-as-leader-poll/2880852

so desperate you are now double posting... how bloody boring is that..

cant you lot find something else to talk about other than TONY I know he needs the exposure.. he laps it up..

but what about the mess this lot have got us into..boat drownings.. two more boats have arrived since that one fell apart on the treacherous highway to OZ...

thats 3 this week alone..

come on why are you not CHEERING this on... its what you guys all want all along..onshore processing. so lets hear it for LABOR...

they have encouraged the boats and its working...yippee

funny the moment something actually starts working...well it is why they cancelled the Pacific Solution isnt it???....

and now its working full blast and what do we get.

yeah we get SILENCE......

come on guys somethinglike this is to saviour...surely!.. you are really proud of this achievment are you not??????????????


HEY ALL YOU CHRISTIAN RIGHTIES A LABOR POLICY IS WORKING...

yes it is!!!!!!


BRING ON THE BOATS WE CAN HANDLE THEM...

SOMETHINGS WORKING.

what a shame its so quiet!

cods wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 12:40pm:

... how bloody boring is that..

Ironically, Cods, your posts have become so...er...random...that I mostly skim over them...

Not that I have any delusions as to the value of my own posts...

::)

Equitist wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 12:55pm:

cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 12:40pm: ... how bloody boring is that.. Ironically, Cods, your posts have become so...er...random...that I mostly skim over them... Not that I have any delusions as to the value of my own posts... ::)

yeah know what you mean... in fact the whole site has become boring... yours we dont have to read anymore than we do buzz  word for word always the same..zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..

and yes I do think you have delusions regarding your own threads.. thats the way you come across..

but like yourself I dont bother with you anymore.. so its good you bypass myself..we have not a thing in common..I cant bring myself to hate and loath quite like you do.. it isnt in me..

so stick to skippy and now deadhorse is back you have heaps to make your visit here worthwhile.not sure whats happened to smithy he has gone over the edge..couldnt have been something I said I am sure..

nah its Abbotts fault..

btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise...

praising your god!!!!!

cods wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 1:03pm:

btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!!

Which offer, Cods!?


[edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!?
I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit]

Equitist wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 1:10pm:

cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit]

She does it all the bloody time, she always manages to weave me into her posts, I think she has a secret crush on me.  :P

Once Rudd takes over - when will he call the election?

Will he continue with the Carbon Tax and the Mining Tax?

To do so would make him no better than Gillard

Equitist wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 1:10pm:

cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit]

they are only picking on you cods because collectively they can't take me on

Maqqa wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 5:11pm:

Equitist wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:10pm: cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit] they are only picking on you cods because collectively they can't take me on

I think it has more to do with your selective and bad memory  ;D ;D

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 7:38am:

Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite.

of course they will get a bump - perhaps as much as 5%. but as the analysts themselves say, FOR HOW LONG? rudd isnt particularly well liked. it is just that Gillard is hated. Rudd will get the leadership, take a large bump and then go to an early election  - and lose.

the ridiculous poll that suggested a 15% poll bump for rudd is ludicrous. there is no precedent for a rise of that size. and especially not a rise from the worst ever labor vote to almost the BEST ever.

complete nonsense.

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:51am:

At the end, Rudd was polling below 40% while Abbott was polling close to 50%. Don't know where you're getting your flimsy numbers from... EVIDENCE?????????????????? Because as far as I remember Abbott never polled higher than Rudd as preferred PM, post up your numbers to prove yourself correct.

I know you struggle with such basic notions as this, despite being apolitical science student. Elections are not decided on preferred PM. in fact people dont even vote according to theire preferred PM belifes. they vote for their preferred PARTY. that is why Rudd had 76% preferred PM an yet got les than 40% in an election. Why this fact escapes you is beyond me.

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 7:40pm:

skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 10:51am: At the end, Rudd was polling below 40% while Abbott was polling close to 50%. Don't know where you're getting your flimsy numbers from... EVIDENCE?????????????????? Because as far as I remember Abbott never polled higher than Rudd as preferred PM, post up your numbers to prove yourself correct. I know you struggle with such basic notions as this, despite being apolitical science student. Elections are not decided on preferred PM. in fact people dont even vote according to theire preferred PM belifes. they vote for their preferred PARTY. that is why Rudd had 76% preferred PM an yet got les than 40% in an election. Why this fact escapes you is beyond me.

NO, you're correct, elections are not decided on preferred PM but that and which party someone will vote for are the main two indicators.
Labor and Rudd in the last  news poll that Rudd was leader was posted here yesterday by your chump armchair
preferred PM Rudd over Abbott by a long shot.
Party you would vote for, Labor 55/45 now tell me that is not an election winning number, that was the last News poll taken with Rudd as leader, and he belted Abbott in both of those categories.

Here you go LW, now tell me Abbott is more popular than Rudd or that under Rudd Labor are less popular then the coalition.You rightards are living in fantasy land,Abbott has peaked too high, under the pretender to the throne, when the "king" returns Abbott is gone.
the last poll taken with RUDD as Pm had Labor ahead
55% to libs 45%
AND Rudd AHEAD OF ABBOTT AS PREFERRED PM
46% TO 37%

Equitist wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 1:10pm:

cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit]

this offer..

come on why are you not CHEERING this on... its what you guys all want all along..onshore processing. so lets hear it for LABOR...

they have encouraged the boats and its working...yippee

funny the moment something actually starts working...well it is why they cancelled the Pacific Solution isnt it???....

and now its working full blast and what do we get.

yeah we get SILENCE......

come on guys somethinglike this is to saviour...surely!.. you are really proud of this achievment are you not??????????????


really.. who said I am unhappy..????????????????

I usually attac someone that attacks me first... although I guess you make a point of missing that point..

how about you take some of your own advice and chill out when it comes to your abuse of any one that Liberal????? because yes you do abuse us for not seeing life through the same rose tinted specs that the left are doing...

and as for your abuse and comments regarding Abbott well words escape me.


what control are you talking about..lol.. thats pathetic.. I just say it as I see it..I dont pretend to be worldly like you do..I cant control GW anymore than I can control IMF.. or people borrowing..but I can have an opinion..at least I thought I could..I cant control who reads me..I wish I could I would love some straight answers to my questions ?????????

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 1:34pm:

Equitist wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:10pm: cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit] She does it all the bloody time, she always manages to weave me into her posts, I think she has a secret crush on me.  :P

so there you have it nem....

I would think a couple of times I have mentioned yourself....you will n otice I am sure unless you comment on me I ignore you completely...so dont worry about any crushes...

one thing about this old girl is she learns lessons..someone doesnt like me.. thats ok.. I steer clear.... I think you will find you have  a bad case of finding it necessary to make comments about myself...more often than not... but again you choose to forget that little detail dont you?


just because I dont think you have the right to wish someone dead on here... makes me a control freak either

cods wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 6:44am:

Sydney/NSW November coup plotted on Julia Gillard - pressure on Kevin Rudd to push The Daily Telegraph KEVIN Rudd is being urged by key backers within the Labor Party to challenge Julia Gillard for the leadership as early as this month. Labor figures behind the push for the former PM to take back the job he was removed from last June have confirmed he was now being advised by his closest confidants not to wait until next year but to launch a challenge as early as the second last week of November. Senior sources within the NSW Right claim the leakage of support away from Ms Gillard, who flew out to France last night for the G20 leaders' meeting, was snowballing. "There are three things that are certain: there is a leadership challenge under way, Rudd doesn't have a majority yet but has enough numbers to be a contender, and they are strategising about how to get it done," said a senior NSW right-wing source. But there was mixed support for the idea of an early move, with some MPs claiming they would "deliver the leadership" to Mr Rudd in February - if he waited. In a sign the PM is now taking seriously the threat of a challenge, an internal counter-offensive has been launched to shore up her leadership. The PM is reported over the past week to have lobbied key affiliated union officials with influence over caucus members to stick with her. Treasurer Wayne Swan is also believed to have privately warned several NSW Labor colleagues that he would resign if they supported a move to return Mr Rudd as leader. The Daily Telegraph revealed two weeks ago that federal NSW Right MPs were softening in their support for Ms Gillard following the bungled Malaysia asylum seeker deal and their deepening concerns about the PM's poker machine reform deal with independent Andrew Wilkie. Should Gillard be replaced with Rudd? Tell us below "It sent Gillard and Swan's office into a panic. Swan has told people that he would quit if we went to Rudd but I doubt he was serious. He wouldn't want to be remembered as the bloke that brought down a Labor government," a senior member of the NSW right said. Mr Swan would not comment last night. Parliament has only one sitting week left after this week, during which a full meeting of the Labor caucus - required for a ballot - could be held. The next opportunity would not come until February when parliament returns from the summer break. Sources close to Mr Rudd said he was well advanced on a policy pitch to address Labor's desperate electoral problems over issues including asylum seekers, the carbon tax and problem gambling. One senior Labor figure, a Rudd supporter, claimed business was starting to "get edgy" over the government's unresolved leadership crisis. "Business knows it's a question of when and want it sorted," they said. Despite Mr Rudd's commanding public popularity, a boost in support for the government if Ms Gillard was rolled was not assured. Secret Coalition research conducted recently concluded voters believed the country was drifting. Voters believe Labor's policies were out of synch with mainstream values, targeting key policy areas including the carbon tax and asylum seeker policy. They also expressed concern at the influence of the so-called faceless men. and shes left the country... my god shes game..

the OP is from the Daily Telegraph and 6 months ago they were calling for an early election.

all the telegraph want is to get rid of the labor government what is in it for them if the liberal get into power.

Maqqa wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 5:11pm:

Equitist wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:10pm: cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit] they are only picking on you cods because collectively they can't take me on

I think its hilarious to be honest... after what we have all been called over and over by nem over the years.. and here she is telling me I am a control freak and should lighten up...what a hoot...

and then little skippy joins in.. forgetting that he would mention me at the drops of a hat...always nasty of course.

talk about pot calling kettle black..I wonder if they know what a reality check is???

Quote:

and then little skippy joins in.. forgetting that he would mention me at the drops of a hat...always nasty of course.

There she goes again, I told you the old troll has a massive crush on the skipster. ;D

adelcrow wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 5:33pm:

Maqqa wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 5:11pm: Equitist wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:10pm: cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit] they are only picking on you cods because collectively they can't take me on I think it has more to do with your selective and bad memory  ;D ;D

Modesty...you forgot her modesty!

;-)

Maqqa wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 5:11pm:

Equitist wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:10pm: cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit] they are only picking on you cods because collectively they can't take me on

iNo one "takes you on" as the collective opinion is that you are massive JOKE - outweighed only by your EGO, IGNORANCE and sense of RELEVENCE


( ... not to mention, you're a bit of a bore)i

bomen_guy wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 7:29am:

cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 6:44am: Sydney/NSW November coup plotted on Julia Gillard - pressure on Kevin Rudd to push The Daily Telegraph KEVIN Rudd is being urged by key backers within the Labor Party to challenge Julia Gillard for the leadership as early as this month. Labor figures behind the push for the former PM to take back the job he was removed from last June have confirmed he was now being advised by his closest confidants not to wait until next year but to launch a challenge as early as the second last week of November. Senior sources within the NSW Right claim the leakage of support away from Ms Gillard, who flew out to France last night for the G20 leaders' meeting, was snowballing. "There are three things that are certain: there is a leadership challenge under way, Rudd doesn't have a majority yet but has enough numbers to be a contender, and they are strategising about how to get it done," said a senior NSW right-wing source. But there was mixed support for the idea of an early move, with some MPs claiming they would "deliver the leadership" to Mr Rudd in February - if he waited. In a sign the PM is now taking seriously the threat of a challenge, an internal counter-offensive has been launched to shore up her leadership. The PM is reported over the past week to have lobbied key affiliated union officials with influence over caucus members to stick with her. Treasurer Wayne Swan is also believed to have privately warned several NSW Labor colleagues that he would resign if they supported a move to return Mr Rudd as leader. The Daily Telegraph revealed two weeks ago that federal NSW Right MPs were softening in their support for Ms Gillard following the bungled Malaysia asylum seeker deal and their deepening concerns about the PM's poker machine reform deal with independent Andrew Wilkie. Should Gillard be replaced with Rudd? Tell us below "It sent Gillard and Swan's office into a panic. Swan has told people that he would quit if we went to Rudd but I doubt he was serious. He wouldn't want to be remembered as the bloke that brought down a Labor government," a senior member of the NSW right said. Mr Swan would not comment last night. Parliament has only one sitting week left after this week, during which a full meeting of the Labor caucus - required for a ballot - could be held. The next opportunity would not come until February when parliament returns from the summer break. Sources close to Mr Rudd said he was well advanced on a policy pitch to address Labor's desperate electoral problems over issues including asylum seekers, the carbon tax and problem gambling. One senior Labor figure, a Rudd supporter, claimed business was starting to "get edgy" over the government's unresolved leadership crisis. "Business knows it's a question of when and want it sorted," they said. Despite Mr Rudd's commanding public popularity, a boost in support for the government if Ms Gillard was rolled was not assured. Secret Coalition research conducted recently concluded voters believed the country was drifting. Voters believe Labor's policies were out of synch with mainstream values, targeting key policy areas including the carbon tax and asylum seeker policy. They also expressed concern at the influence of the so-called faceless men. and shes left the country... my god shes game.. the OP is from the Daily Telegraph and 6 months ago they were calling for an early election. all the telegraph want is to get rid of the labor government what is in it for them if the liberal get into power.

What's in it for them? Same as everyone else, kicking out an incompetent bunch of neanderthals and having the country run by some competent people instead of the ALP and Greens.

cods has no credibility, ... I MEAN, RATIONALE!  :-*

Equitist wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 7:55am:

adelcrow wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 5:33pm: Maqqa wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 5:11pm: Equitist wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:10pm: cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit] they are only picking on you cods because collectively they can't take me on I think it has more to do with your selective and bad memory  ;D ;D Modesty...you forgot her modesty! ;-)

DUH!!!!!!!!!!

what are you talking about... you nem talk in a foreign language at times.. just a pinch too high and mighty but I am sure you impress yourself..you certainly have a bad case of Pot calling Kettle Black..old girl.

its can be a problem on here... but never mind you and your toll deserve each other so I wont get in the way..and let you have your little girls bitch at my expense.......ooooopppppps you didnt mention Abbott for a couple of posts.. watch it withdrawals can be nasty..and you would know!

cods wrote on Nov 4^th, 2011 at 7:22am:

Equitist wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:10pm: cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 1:03pm: btw nem I see you didnt take up my offer... surprise surprise... praising your god!!!!! Which offer, Cods!? [edit]PS Cods, I don't think that you realise how many of your own posts make a direct attack on one or more other posters!? I really think you would be happier posting here if you just chilled-out a bit and didn't try to control everyone else's behaviour.[/edit] this offer.. come on why are you not CHEERING this on... its what you guys all want all along..onshore processing. so lets hear it for LABOR... they have encouraged the boats and its working...yippee funny the moment something actually starts working...well it is why they cancelled the Pacific Solution isnt it???.... and now its working full blast and what do we get. yeah we get SILENCE...... come on guys somethinglike this is to saviour...surely!.. you are really proud of this achievment are you not?????????????? really.. who said I am unhappy..???????????????? I usually attac someone that attacks me first... although I guess you make a point of missing that point.. how about you take some of your own advice and chill out when it comes to your abuse of any one that Liberal????? because yes you do abuse us for not seeing life through the same rose tinted specs that the left are doing... and as for your abuse and comments regarding Abbott well words escape me. what control are you talking about..lol.. thats pathetic.. I just say it as I see it..I dont pretend to be worldly like you do..I cant control GW anymore than I can control IMF.. or people borrowing..but I can have an opinion..at least I thought I could..I cant control who reads me..I wish I could I would love some straight answers to my questions ?????????

I see you managed to miss my offer again thanks for reminding me of it..just in case you missed it..

skippy. wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 10:13am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:49am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:41am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 9:34am: skippy. wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 7:38am: Swan is glued to Gillard if she gets dumped so will he. Interesting the Tele are suggesting Labor may not get as bump in the polls by returning to Rudd, EVERY SINGLE poll taken suggests the opposite. Rudd is the cause of many (if not all) of the problems that plague Labor in Canberra. I can't understand why they'd go back to him. It's a bit like a soccer coach removing a goal keeper who lets in 7 goals only to bring him back on for the second half. It makes no sense whatsoever to bring back Rudd. Thats your opinion, it may well be true, but that doesn't change the fact Rudd has in every poll taken been the preferred PM over both Abbott and Gillard and Turnbull. The fact the right try to put him down so much just shows they can see the "precious" slipping from their grip if Rudd is returned. Have you (and his other supporters) forgotten how dismally he polled in the dying stages of his Prime Ministership??? Whitlam could have polled better. LOL those so called "dismall poll figures" were still higher than Abbotts. ;D ;D ;D I know you're afraid, because this could well put the spot light back on Abbott,and so it should. Abbott is not good for this country and he does not deserve to slide into the lodge by default. You continually make the mistake of assuming I'm a Labor supporter, I'm not ,if the Libs had a decent leader I'd support them, but Abbott is not decent nor a leader, he's an attack dog reactionist who has proven to be the most effective opposition leader I have seen.I hope Labors move to dump Gillard will have a flow on effect and the Libs will dump Abbott, but if they dont I will support Rudd at the next election, as will many others who could never accept a loony like Abbott as PM.

Skip off, skippy--

I can smell a true leftie a mile away!

The point is that fatheads like you, should evaluate what is best for one's country and both Gillard and Rudd, either through stupidity or intent, are wound up to bankrupt this country.

Abbot may not be lovable to many but I'm pretty sure, he is terribly worried about where the country is sliding and will do his best to stop it sliding further.

You'd vote for Rudd even if he kicked your behind while you are filling voting forms in your booth.

Equitist wrote on Nov 3^rd, 2011 at 12:55pm:

cods wrote on Nov 3rd, 2011 at 12:40pm: ... how bloody boring is that.. Ironically, Cods, your posts have become so...er...random...that I mostly skim over them... Not that I have any delusions as to the value of my own posts... Dear, dear - jealousy is a curse, Equitist.

salty  wrote

Quote:

The point is that fatheads like you, should evaluate what is best for one's country

I have, and the answers not Abbott.

Quote:

many but I'm pretty sure, he is terribly worried about where the country is sliding and will do his best to stop it sliding further.

The only thing Abbott is worried about is he has failed to oust Gillard in the time span he needed to, it is all down hill for him the longer this parliament goes.

The title is a little confusing, I know, but that's because you're only allowed a certain amount of characters. What my point in this thread, is, that I've heard some lefties going around and criticisng the polls for a lack of validity as some exclude the Northern Territory (despite the fact that it only makes up 1% of our population anyway), which, according to them, is anti-Coalition and pro-Labor. Well, this just doesn't hold any water whatsoever.

Need I remind you that there are 2 seats in the NT. One is held by Labor (Lingiari), the other by the Coalition (Solomon). The Coalition gained Solomon last year, and made a significant leap in Lingiari. I am very confident that that too will go to the Coalition next election.

I was in the NT a few weeks ago, and spoke to many, many people up there about this issue. The vast majority said that they will be voting for the Coalition next election, and that they are sick with, and disgusted by Labor. I also spoke to a farmer at the Carbon tax rally who flew all the way down to the ACT just to voice his protest.

Did you go for the Darwin Pride Festival Matty? Was it fun? Did Karnal go with you?

Festivals are fun! fun! fun!

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/187316_100002129206492_3480357_n.jpg

I was in darwin a week ago too.

but yet again matty, you demonstrate that you dont have a clue about posting spam.

this is just more of the same drivel. it will be moved.

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 5:26pm:

I was in darwin a week ago too. but yet again matty, you demonstrate that you dont have a clue about posting spam. this is just more of the same drivel. it will be moved.

How is this spam though? Spam is repeating something over and over again. I have never talked about the NT before, so that's simply wrong. Windsor and Oakeshott? Yes, that was spamming.

matty wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 5:30pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 5:26pm: I was in darwin a week ago too. but yet again matty, you demonstrate that you dont have a clue about posting spam. this is just more of the same drivel. it will be moved. How is this spam though? Spam is repeating something over and over again. I have never talked about the NT before, so that's simply wrong. Windsor and Oakeshott? Yes, that was spamming.

it took 30 threads on windsor and oackshott before you got the hint it was over the top. and yet you STILL post threads on them. moving the state from NSW to NT doesnt change it.

Honestly, I am starting to wonder if you are over 18. You are like a child who when punished for drawing on the wall with a texta then goes back and draws with a crayon and doesnt understand why they are in trouble.

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 5:34pm:

matty wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 5:30pm: longweekend58 wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 5:26pm: I was in darwin a week ago too. but yet again matty, you demonstrate that you dont have a clue about posting spam. this is just more of the same drivel. it will be moved. How is this spam though? Spam is repeating something over and over again. I have never talked about the NT before, so that's simply wrong. Windsor and Oakeshott? Yes, that was spamming. it took 30 threads on windsor and oackshott before you got the hint it was over the top. and yet you STILL post threads on them. moving the state from NSW to NT doesnt change it. Honestly, I am starting to wonder if you are over 18. You are like a child who when punished for drawing on the wall with a texta then goes back and draws with a crayon and doesnt understand why they are in trouble.

lon gy sometimes I think you can be a bit too strict.. its now getting to the stage where there is more talk on here about you than there is about rudds come back...lol... just kidding..but I like to see the boards keep moving myself..when things are the same thats one thing.. but when its a different slant on somthing that shouldnt be a problem..at least I dont think so.

matty is over the top with his hypotheticals...[sorry matty but thats the truth]...but really who cares if you cant be bothered with them.. move to the next one or put your own up to talk about..

those who constantly whinge about that sort of thing.. need to take a good look at themselves..matty does ask questions.!!! well sort of.. he doesnt start

Abbott is a Wanker.. threads..

matty if you tone things down and get more realistic..and stop asking WHY.. as no one has a crystal ball.. well on the right anyway... ;D ;D ;D

you may be taken more seriously.

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 5^th, 2011 at 5:34pm:

matty wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 5:30pm: longweekend58 wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 5:26pm: I was in darwin a week ago too. but yet again matty, you demonstrate that you dont have a clue about posting spam. this is just more of the same drivel. it will be moved. How is this spam though? Spam is repeating something over and over again. I have never talked about the NT before, so that's simply wrong. Windsor and Oakeshott? Yes, that was spamming. it took 30 threads on windsor and oackshott before you got the hint it was over the top. and yet you STILL post threads on them. moving the state from NSW to NT doesnt change it. Honestly, I am starting to wonder if you are over 18. You are like a child who when punished for drawing on the wall with a texta then goes back and draws with a crayon and doesnt understand why they are in trouble.

The whole country is spanning, talking about Rudd and Gillard. . .

Maybe we should please the braindead, just ignore the man donkey and girl-donkey and follow them over the cliff?

How much is jenny borrowing each day, pretending all is well?

olde.sault wrote on Nov 6^th, 2011 at 7:25am:

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 5:34pm: matty wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 5:30pm: longweekend58 wrote on Nov 5th, 2011 at 5:26pm: I was in darwin a week ago too. but yet again matty, you demonstrate that you dont have a clue about posting spam. this is just more of the same drivel. it will be moved. How is this spam though? Spam is repeating something over and over again. I have never talked about the NT before, so that's simply wrong. Windsor and Oakeshott? Yes, that was spamming. it took 30 threads on windsor and oackshott before you got the hint it was over the top. and yet you STILL post threads on them. moving the state from NSW to NT doesnt change it. Honestly, I am starting to wonder if you are over 18. You are like a child who when punished for drawing on the wall with a texta then goes back and draws with a crayon and doesnt understand why they are in trouble. The whole country is spanning, talking about Rudd and Gillard. . . Maybe we should please the braindead, just ignore the man donkey and girl-donkey and follow them over the cliff? How much is jenny borrowing each day, pretending all is well?

it is pretty sad when a political boards comes down to childish complaints about a moderator.. for gods sakes..

we must be doing it all good oldie......look nothing to whinge about except a righty mod..who they think is picking on themmmmmmmmmmmmmmm