http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/breaking/9295922/no-evidence-bin-laden-was-terrorist-habib/

The death of Osama bin Laden will not end the war on terror and there is no evidence he masterminded the September 11 attacks, former Guantanamo Bay detainee Mamdouh Habib says.

“America is the war on terror, George Bush is the war on Terror,” Mr Habib said today. “What, you think with Osama bin Laden dying there won’t be war any more? There is no evidence he was a terrorist.”

Mr Habib said bin Laden’s death would not slow the war on terror.

“I’m not surprised by his dying,” he said. “The war will never stop. America needs to stop lying and stop abusing power ... and not be a devil.”

Mr Habib also said he was “disgusted” by reports US authorities were in possession of bin Laden’s body.

“Because to hold someone’s body, really, it’s not a human being doing that. If he were alive, it’s not really an issue,” he said.

“If you take a human being’s body and play with it after he is dead, that’s disgusting. We have to bury his body. Good or bad, we have to respect his body.

“What, are they going to make a statue for him?“

The President said he was briefed last August on a report that bin Laden was hiding within a compound deep within Pakistan and last week authorised the assault on it.

The attack was carried out by a small team of Americans on Sunday (US time).

There was a firefight and bin Laden was killed. The Americans then took custody of his body, the President said.

“The death of bin laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s efforts to defeat al- Qaida,” the president said.

Mamd'oh - nuf said.

Soren wrote on May 2^nd, 2011 at 9:41pm:

Mamd'oh - nuf said.

can anyone tell me why it is necessary to get a quote from this man??????.

he has got his money... stuff him I dont care what he thinks..or says..in fact we dont even have to have it printed to know what he thinks..tell him he can now go back to Pakistan.and good riddance.

Like Habib or hate him, he is essentially correct in most of what he said.

Quote:

...........“Because to hold someone’s body, really, it’s not a human being doing that. If he were alive, it’s not really an issue,” he said. “If you take a human being’s body and play with it after he is dead, that’s disgusting. We have to bury his body. Good or bad, we have to respect his body...............

typical perverted islamic obsessive mindset.
if osama was alive it would not matter what happens to him ?
only now he is dead ??? the goal of all nutters

No, noone has to respect that scum.
drown him in pigs blood, then have a homo behead him

This Habib guy is scum, I said he supports terrorism all the time he was arrested.

He now clearly shows that he does.

Why we allow foreign trash like him into the country is beyond me.

Kat wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 11:55am:

Like Habib or hate him, he is essentially correct in most of what he said.

You must read and interpret the english language different to me, most of what he said was utter horse shiat.

But then, I tend not to believe the words of terrorists scumbags.

BigOl64 wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:07pm:

Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 11:55am: Like Habib or hate him, he is essentially correct in most of what he said. You must read and interpret the english language different to me, most of what he said was utter horse shiat. But then, I tend not to believe the words of terrorists scumbags.

The difference between you and me, is that I read his comments
with an open mind.

You, quite obviously, did not.

"There is no evidence he was a terrorist"


Yeah read that with an open mind.

Habib is terrorist scum.

Kat wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:18pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:07pm: Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 11:55am: Like Habib or hate him, he is essentially correct in most of what he said. You must read and interpret the english language different to me, most of what he said was utter horse shiat. But then, I tend not to believe the words of terrorists scumbags. The difference between you and me, is that I read his comments with an open mind. You, quite obviously, did not.

“If you take a human being’s body and play with it after he is dead, that’s disgusting. We have to bury his body. Good or bad, we have to respect his body.

“What, are they going to make a statue for him?“



Might I suggest that you apply a standard bullshiat filter of what you read, so you don't end up believing every numbskull statement put into print.

You'll look less of a dill that way.

The simple fact is that he was not there, hes has no evidence of what he is saying, he prolly has a bit of bias against his captors, you could quite reasonably discount everything he has stated and not be 'closed minded'.

But WTF, you go on and believe this tool, 'cause it makes you look intellegent when you believe unsubstantiated biased commentary.  ;D

Grow up!

He IS essentially correct when he says that Bin Emptied's death
will not stop the war on terror.

And he IS essentially correct when he talks about what happened
to Bin Emptied's body. Muslims (be they terrs or not) do feel
strongly about what happens to a Muslim's body after death.

Like it or not, that's FACT.

NEXT!

BigOl64 wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:26pm:

Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:18pm: BigOl64 wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:07pm: Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 11:55am: Like Habib or hate him, he is essentially correct in most of what he said. You must read and interpret the english language different to me, most of what he said was utter horse shiat. But then, I tend not to believe the words of terrorists scumbags. The difference between you and me, is that I read his comments with an open mind. You, quite obviously, did not. “If you take a human being’s body and play with it after he is dead, that’s disgusting. We have to bury his body. Good or bad, we have to respect his body. “What, are they going to make a statue for him?“ Might I suggest that you apply a standard bullshiat filter of what you read, so you don't end up believing every numbskull statement put into print. You'll look less of a dill that way. The simple fact is that he was not there, hes has no evidence of what he is saying, he prolly has a bit of bias against his captors, you could quite reasonably discount everything he has stated and not be 'closed minded'. But WTF, you go on and believe this tool, 'cause it makes you look intellegent when you believe unsubstantiated biased commentary.  ;D

One of these days, you'll post a comment that isn't biased or
ignorant, and doesn't attack other posters whose views don't
coincide with your own.

But, I'm sure not holding my breath.

Next, you'll be accusing me of supporting the terrs.

They buried him at sea to prevent a shrine going up. Way to go.

Now I will wait for the photographs to hit the net, of grinning U S sailors posing with the body (which has had a smiley face painted on it) and giving the thumbs up!  :)

d.

Kat wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:29pm:

Grow up! He IS essentially correct when he says that Bin Emptied's death will not stop the war on terror. And he IS essentially correct when he talks about what happened to Bin Emptied's body. Muslims (be they terrs or not) do feel strongly about what happens to a Muslim's body after death. Like it or not, that's FACT. NEXT!

habib stating that this isn't the end of the war on terror is a fact because everyone else, obama, gillard, et al had stated that before him, his statement is irrrelevant. There are 6.5 billion people on this planet who could have repeated the same 'old news' without ,making a big deal of it.

He has not provided any evidence that that scumbags body was 'mis-handled' so my accusation of you and him still stands.

Kat wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:18pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:07pm: Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 11:55am: Like Habib or hate him, he is essentially correct in most of what he said. You must read and interpret the english language different to me, most of what he said was utter horse shiat. But then, I tend not to believe the words of terrorists scumbags. The difference between you and me, is that I read his comments with an open mind. You, quite obviously, did not.

he said Obama is the terrorist not Osama..

he says Obama is waging a war of tyranny..

but its good to know who you believe and think is correct

cods wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 6:20pm:

Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:18pm: BigOl64 wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:07pm: Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 11:55am: Like Habib or hate him, he is essentially correct in most of what he said. You must read and interpret the english language different to me, most of what he said was utter horse shiat. But then, I tend not to believe the words of terrorists scumbags. The difference between you and me, is that I read his comments with an open mind. You, quite obviously, did not. he said Obama is the terrorist not Osama.. he says Obama is waging a war of tyranny.. but its good to know who you believe and think is correct

You obviously misread my post as well...

Try again.....


""He IS essentially correct when he says that Bin Emptied's death
will not stop the war on terror.

And he IS essentially correct when he talks about what happened
to Bin Emptied's body. Muslims (be they terrs or not) do feel
strongly about what happens to a Muslim's body after death.""


Get it now?

Probably not....

I'm getting rather tired of the way the right deliberately
misinterpret ANYTHING the left or the centrists say.

Kat wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:29pm:

Grow up! He IS essentially correct when he says that Bin Emptied's death will not stop the war on terror. And he IS essentially correct when he talks about what happened to Bin Emptied's body. Muslims (be they terrs or not) do feel strongly about what happens to a Muslim's body after death. Like it or not, that's FACT. NEXT!

no he says that Obama  will find some other excuse now to continue the war...

not a mention about jihad and retribution..being an excuse.

as for the body what did you expect him to say... hes a microbe.they would have taken DNA.. thats a given but when you think of these guys chopping off peoples head.s.. and they worry about what happens to bodies.I dont think so.. you want respect for your beliefs at least pretend you respect others..

do you know how many muslims were killed in 9/11..what about Bali was that only christians no muslims working there..

couldnt have been too worried then could they?

ok..I'll play the silly game, just how did Habib defend Bin Laden?
And why would anyone quote this mentally ill nit wit in the first place?

Kat wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 6:23pm:

cods wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 6:20pm: Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:18pm: BigOl64 wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 12:07pm: Kat wrote on May 3rd, 2011 at 11:55am: Like Habib or hate him, he is essentially correct in most of what he said. You must read and interpret the english language different to me, most of what he said was utter horse shiat. But then, I tend not to believe the words of terrorists scumbags. The difference between you and me, is that I read his comments with an open mind. You, quite obviously, did not. he said Obama is the terrorist not Osama.. he says Obama is waging a war of tyranny.. but its good to know who you believe and think is correct You obviously misread my post as well... Try again..... ""He IS essentially correct when he says that Bin Emptied's death will not stop the war on terror. And he IS essentially correct when he talks about what happened to Bin Emptied's body. Muslims (be they terrs or not) do feel strongly about what happens to a Muslim's body after death."" Get it now? Probably not.... I'm getting rather tired of the way the right deliberately misinterpret ANYTHING the left or the centrists say.

your second post came up after my first one...

you claimed you read him with an open mind thats why you said what you said..

what makes you think you are the only one with an open mind?

... its in black and white..its got nothing to do with what he ESSENTIALLY said.. he said it..

you are twisting it to make yourself look better .. well that okay as well.

but dont call others for not having an open mind..you are the one being judgemental here.

adelcrow wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 6:29pm:

ok..I'll play the silly game, just how did Habib defend Bin Laden? And why would anyone quote this mentally ill nit wit in the first place?

well I have already asked that... why does the media need to have this guys opinion on this.. who cars what he thinks..


anyway he said...Obama is the terrorist not osoma.. he said Obama will now find another excuse to keep up with war of tyranny..

and something about the yanks playing with the body..mmm I dont know I wasnt there.

It wouldn`t be hard to find muslim fruitcakes who see nothing wrong with murdering "infidels".  As to this belated act of taking out this particular garbage ending terrorism, of course it won`t end terrorism, I don`t know of anyone making such a stupid statement.

I hope they burried this germ with another pig`s body beside him.

Since when has Habib been a newsworthy social commentator?
Just more useless trash bought to us from our junk media.

Surely...all intelligent people must dispair at the low standard of crap that masquerades for mainstream media these days.

Quotes taken DIRECTLY from the story.

THESE are the ones I commented on.

1/
'The death of Osama bin Laden will not end the war on terror ...."

2/ "If you take a human being’s body and play with it after he is dead, that’s disgusting. We have to bury his body. Good or bad, we have to respect his body."


You have, AGAIN, put words into my mouth, specifically to
attack ME, not the story.

Again, for those that missed it, or didn't get it...

He is essentially correct, in these statements.

So bite me.

But this is Mumdouh Habib!
How is his opinion on anything important to anyone?
Gee..there are experts on these things that should be listened to..not this unemployed nutjob.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:04pm:

This Habib guy is scum, I said he supports terrorism all the time he was arrested. He now clearly shows that he does.

Absolutely wrong.
The only comment Habib made that could be construed as supporting terrorism was his comment that he didn't believe Osama was a terrorist. But lets face it, there are a lot of people who believe in conspiracy theories regarding 9/11 yet these people arn't accused of supporting terrorism (they are just fruitcakes).

It seems that the right wing are just trying to read things in to Habibs comments that they want to believe.

The word going around is they mutilated Bin Laden and his Wifes bodies and genitalia before throwing them out of the Helicopter into the sea and it was on orders. :( >:(

I still respect the Geneva convention no matter whose body we are talking about.

adelcrow wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 7:08pm:

But this is Mumdouh Habib! How is his opinion on anything important to anyone? Gee..there are experts on these things that should be listened to..not this unemployed nutjob.

Yes, most of what he said was rubbish, but , on the two
issues I mentioned, he does have a point.

I do not support terrorism OR terrorists.

Nor do I agree with most of Habib's comments.

But he isn't wrong when he said that bin Laden's death won't
end the war on terror.

Nor is he wrong when he speaks of how the body was treated.
Muslims (terrs or not) do have strong beliefs on what should
happen to a body after death.

Habib DID make those statements. And they are correct.

Why attack me for simply pointing that out?

Maqqa wrote on May 2^nd, 2011 at 9:19pm:

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/breaking/9295922/no-evidence-bin-laden-was-terrorist-habib/ The death of Osama bin Laden will not end the war on terror and there is no evidence he masterminded the September 11 attacks, former Guantanamo Bay detainee Mamdouh Habib says. “America is the war on terror, George Bush is the war on Terror,” Mr Habib said today. “What, you think with Osama bin Laden dying there won’t be war any more? There is no evidence he was a terrorist.” Mr Habib said bin Laden’s death would not slow the war on terror. “I’m not surprised by his dying,” he said. “The war will never stop. America needs to stop lying and stop abusing power ... and not be a devil.” Mr Habib also said he was “disgusted” by reports US authorities were in possession of bin Laden’s body. “Because to hold someone’s body, really, it’s not a human being doing that. If he were alive, it’s not really an issue,” he said. “If you take a human being’s body and play with it after he is dead, that’s disgusting. We have to bury his body. Good or bad, we have to respect his body. “What, are they going to make a statue for him?“ The President said he was briefed last August on a report that bin Laden was hiding within a compound deep within Pakistan and last week authorised the assault on it. The attack was carried out by a small team of Americans on Sunday (US time). There was a firefight and bin Laden was killed. The Americans then took custody of his body, the President said. “The death of bin laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s efforts to defeat al- Qaida,” the president said.

its people like this bozo that almost justify Guantamo. my sympathy for his internment there is zero. at least Hicks has apprentely seen the error of his ways.

Kat wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:29pm:

Grow up! He IS essentially correct when he says that Bin Emptied's death will not stop the war on terror. And he IS essentially correct when he talks about what happened to Bin Emptied's body. Muslims (be they terrs or not) do feel strongly about what happens to a Muslim's body after death. Like it or not, that's FACT. NEXT!

He also said that Bin Liner was not a terrorist. that pretty much discredits EVERYTHING he has to say.

Kat wrote on May 4^th, 2011 at 7:18am:

I do not support terrorism OR terrorists. Nor do I agree with most of Habib's comments. But he isn't wrong when he said that bin Laden's death won't end the war on terror. Nor is he wrong when he speaks of how the body was treated. Muslims (terrs or not) do have strong beliefs on what should happen to a body after death. Habib DID make those statements. And they are correct. Why attack me for simply pointing that out?

Nobody is even suggesting that the end of Bin Liner will end terrorism. As for treating the body with respect... I think that ship sailed 10 years ago where he was concerned.

Kat wrote on May 3^rd, 2011 at 12:29pm:

Muslims (be they terrs or not) do feel strongly about what happens to a Muslim's body after death.

But any infidells can have their effin' heads cut off of THEIR bodies.

Fact.