| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Political Parties >> The Greens >> Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1301519050 Message started by buzzanddidj on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:04am |
|
|
Title: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by buzzanddidj on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:04am
Greens sailing to power in German state
Sun Mar 27, 2011 BERLIN – Germany's anti-nuclear Greens on Sunday scored a remarkable victory over chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative party in a state election that had turned into a referendum on nuclear power in the wake of Japan's Fukushima disaster. The Greens doubled their voter share in wealthy Baden-Wuerttemberg state and seemed poised to oust Merkel's Christian Democrats who held power there for almost six decades, according to preliminary results released by the state electoral commission. The Greens are also set to win their first ever state governorship, the results showed. "This is a day that has strongly changed the political landscape in Germany," party chairwoman Claudia Roth said in Berlin. The Greens secured 24.2 percent of the vote, with the center-left Social Democrats down 2 percentage points at 23.1 percent. That secures them a narrow lead to form a coalition government with a combined 71 seats in the state legislature, the results showed. "We have secured what amounts to a historic electoral victory," the Greens' local leader Winfried Kretschmann told party members in Stuttgart. Cont ... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110327/ap_on_re_eu/eu_germany_elections This is part of a GROWING movement - and AWARENESS - world-wide Like their German affiliates, the AUSTRALIAN Greens are NOT going away The movement is here for the "long haul" |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by BigOl64 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:08am I wonder how long the loons will last once those germans no longer have reliable power to cook up their saurerkraut and bratwurst. ;D Nothing more than a knee jerk reaction founded on fear. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by philperth2010 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:19am BigOl64 wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:08am:
So you support the fear of a new tax but ridicule the fear of a nuclear accident......I fail to see any logic in your argument??? :) |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by progressiveslol on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:24am buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:04am:
Oh good. The German's can screw themselves for us to watch and go 'thank god Australians were not that stupid' |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by BigOl64 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:25am philperth2010 wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:19am:
WTF are you on about? Nothing in my statement, or the very pretty initial post, mentions anything about any friggen tax. Don't question my logic when your statement is neither cogent, rational or friggen logical. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by longweekend58 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 8:08am
They're Greens Bigol... expecting logic is a bit silly!
the best part is that buzzard now has to go OVERSEAS to see any Green successes. He needs reminding however that the Greens 'successes' in Germany are nothing more than gaining back the ground they lost last time when they suffered a major repudiation. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by buzzanddidj on Mar 31st, 2011 at 8:17am longweekend58 wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 8:08am:
And only YOU, could read an INCREASE in the Greens' primary (as has been the pattern EVERY state and federal election) as a "dreadful result" |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by buzzanddidj on Mar 31st, 2011 at 8:23am longweekend58 wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 8:08am:
Quote:
|
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by dsmithy70 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 8:32am BigOl64 wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:08am:
You've just encapsulated the entire manifesto of the current Federal Liberal Party. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by BigOl64 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 9:02am Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 8:32am:
While i do agree with you on that statement, this isn't about the liberal party, this is about the boxhead greens. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by Andrei.Hicks on Mar 31st, 2011 at 9:12am
Germans and Austrians have always been a bit that way.
I recall on my very first day living in Vienna being taken to task by a complete stranger for not separating my recycled rubbish in the correct bins. This was 1996. The Austrians all rode on bikes and recycled near on everything. To me and my UK colleague on a uni exchange it was a different world. I told the lady in England it all goes in the same bin, she was appalled. So the Greens always do well in these hippy kind of countries. I could have brought up with this woman how her country produced Adolf Hitler and murdered 6m people because of their religion but I let it slide..... |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by bogarde73 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 9:42am
Buzz has now abandoned all pretence of being a Labor supporter and has shifted his allegiance 100% to the party of the anti-semite Mayor of Marrickville.
Not surprising that that region in Germany has gone for the Greens, being home to a lingering pool of nazi sympathies. I believe it is where Visconti filmed his movie "The Damned" and the locals enjoyed the work as extras dressed in their SA brownshirt uniforms. Buzz of course has shifted his support for the most practical of reasons, ie the Greens are the only party likely to give him a homosexual marriage certificate. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by culldav on Mar 31st, 2011 at 9:59am
I don’t think the Greens in Germany have the same radical open-door immigration views as the Australian Greens. I think the GG’s are more focused on a greener earth for everyone and cleaner energy.
|
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by bridonta on Mar 31st, 2011 at 12:16pm
unlike the Green here in Australia worry about homosexual, illegal people in detention, carbon tax .. but the Green in Germany is not that extreme but smarter .. it worries about its people safety if expose to Nucleus .. and disasters in Japan have helped them with supports ..
|
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by longweekend58 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 1:02pm buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 8:17am:
Complex analysis is clearly beyond you. But I might point out that during the time of the Liberals poll woes some 18months ago MY ANALYSIS of events predicted a resurgence of liberal polls (although not as fast as happened) and a significant problem for the decision-free labor govt. I was proven right while you were proven wrong. On that basis alone my prediction that the Greens have reached the zenith of their popularity is proving true. the fed election was their max and since then every election has had a result below that. You just dont liek analysis that disputes your love of all thigns Green. be it polls or even election results - everythign is rogue unless it supports what you believe. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by stryder110011 on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:25pm
Former minister for the environment John Gormley is to step down as Green Party leader.
Mr Gormley, who lost his Dáil seat in the general election, told party members in an email that he would not be seeking re-election. In an email to party members, Mr Gormley described the party’s performance in the election, which saw it lose all six of its Dail seats, as a “temporary demise”. The party will hold a meeting of its national executive council at the end of this month, before its annual general meeting in May. It is hoping to initiate a strategy for the next local elections in three years’ time. Under party rules, a leadership contest must be held within six months of an election. Mr Gormley won a ballot of members to become leader in July 2007, taking over from Trevor Sargent, who resigned when the party entered coalition with Fianna Fáil. Senator Dan Boyle, party chairman, would not be drawn today on whether he would contest the leadership. But he was confident the party could rebuild. “It’s not a unique experience,” he said. “The German Greens, the Belgian Greens and the Czech Greens have all had similar experiences. It’s something of a rite of passage almost for the Green Party in terms of their first experience of parliament, their first experience of government.” http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2011/0320/breaking14.html WELL NOT ALL THE GREENS ARE MAKING GAINS, IT SEEMS AS THOUGH THE IRISH HAD A GUTFUL OF THE GREENS, IRELAND IS BROKE PARTLY BECAUSE OF THEM, ;D ;D ;D I know Buzz these days is leaning on the GREENS, I guess his happy with Labors new role in the alliance of PLAYING THE B***H. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by Sprintcyclist on Mar 31st, 2011 at 11:39pm and here's another green who has hit her head on the stupidity extremism branches all the way down. Quote:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/bob-brown-told-to-rein-in-anti-israel-senator-lee-rhiannon/story-fn59niix-1226031644809 |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by mavisdavis on Apr 1st, 2011 at 6:42am
It`s abundantly clear to anyone with any cognitive ability at all that "Greens" generally are no more than a lazy, feel good party, living off the system and the environment that they so heroically profess to protect.
|
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by dsmithy70 on Apr 1st, 2011 at 7:26am Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 11:39pm:
It's nice to agree on something for a change. Lee Rhiannon is every caricature of the Greens rolled into 1, extremist nutbag. The Tony Abbott of the Greens. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by bogarde73 on Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:49am
<It's nice to agree on something for a change.
Lee Rhiannon is every caricature of the Greens rolled into 1, extremist nutbag. The Tony Abbott of the Greens.> Who's agreeing with your statement smithy? Uncouple the remark about Tony Abbott and it's fine. But as usual you can't concede a point of common sense, in which you are sadly lacking, without grudgingly adding some unrelated slur. You give a bad name to donkeys! |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by bogarde73 on Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:51am
All we need now is for the Greens' number one apologist - Buzz - to come on here and assure us that they are not anti-semite.
But he seems to duck & weave on that one. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by dsmithy70 on Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:56am bogarde73 wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:49am:
I was actually posting to sprint, I think that this is the 1st time we've found common ground. As for the rest, your an Abbott supporter I expected nothing less than childish base insults. Gunna call me a dole bludger next? Or perhaps have a go at my ethnic origins? What other positives has Tone put out there.........................hmmmm F@#K ALL it would seem. It will be interesting to see your POV when this experiment is over. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by bogarde73 on Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:58am
Are you a dole bludger? Do you have some ethnic origin that requires comment?
Do tell. |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by dsmithy70 on Apr 1st, 2011 at 10:02am bogarde73 wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:58am:
Since when are facts required? |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by Sprintcyclist on Apr 1st, 2011 at 12:08pm Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 9:56am:
smithy - yes, must be close to the first time we have agreed. Lets just keep quiet and hope noone notices :-) Mum's the word |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by nichy on Apr 1st, 2011 at 1:21pm
smithy - yes, must be close to the first time we have agreed.
Lets just keep quiet and hope noone notices Mum's the word Aha, little Nichys have big ears, I heard you. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by Deathridesahorse on Apr 1st, 2011 at 3:16pm BigOl64 wrote on Mar 31st, 2011 at 7:08am:
STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :-[ :-X STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :-[ :-X |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by Deathridesahorse on Apr 1st, 2011 at 3:17pm mavisdavis wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 6:42am:
STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :-[ :-X STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :-[ :-X |
|
Title: Re: Greens Making Big Gains ... INTERNATIONALLY Post by Deathridesahorse on Apr 1st, 2011 at 3:17pm Dsmithy70 wrote on Apr 1st, 2011 at 10:02am:
STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :-[ :-X STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. STEVE CANNANE: But when I went back to Greg Hunt today, he said he defines 100 square kilometres as a hundred by a hundred, not 10 by 10. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :-[ :-X Greg Hunt doesn't believe in facts!!! :D :D ;D |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |