PAULINE Hanson was in line for a shock win in the NSW Upper House last night.
After being written off after early counting on Saturday, the former One Nation Party leader crept ahead of a Greens candidate yesterday.

The first votes counted in the Upper House were from Sydney and metropolitan areas but Ms Hanson has performed better in votes that were counted yesterday in rural NSW.

Ms Hanson, who has moved to a coastal town north of Newcastle, was last night ahead of third Greens candidate Jeremy Buckingham.

She reached a quota in the counting of 0.41, slightly ahead of Mr Buckingham's 0.398.

Labor's sixth candidate, Andrew Ferguson last night slipped behind them both to 0.34.

The Greens were a slim hope of winning the final spot last night if they benefit from any Labor preferences.

Ms Hanson did not return calls from The Daily Telegraph last night

Won't there be dancing in the streets in Lakemba & Auburn?
(It'll be a bit like 9/11 really)

I welcome Pauline Hansons voice back into the world of Politics, the more people we have representing us in there and not the globalists and corporations the better. :)

This would be a truly amazing result if she gets in, not that I am convinced it will happen.
Admittedly she has a very high profile - maybe the most recognisable political figure in the country.
But to come from nowhere, with no party backing, to win an upper house seat!
We'll see.

WELCOME BACK PAULINE  :) :) :) :) :)

http://media.mytalk.com.au/2ue/audio/090311ZegShesBack.jpg

It doesn't surprise me,
The average age of Port Stephens is 78
People go there to die & old people are easily scared by change & funny clothes.
Have a look at some of their thoughts posted here ;)

I support the preferential system - and proportional representation - but there ARE oddities and DOWNSIDES to it

Pauline Hanson
1.87% of the vote
SEAT WON

Christian Democrats
3.07% of the vote
(down 1.35%)
SEAT WON

Shooters and Fishers
3.7% of the vote
(down 0.91%)
SEAT WON

The Greens
10.89% of the vote
(up 1.77%)
NO SEAT WON



http://www.abc.net.au/elections/nsw/2011/guide/lc-results.htm


FORTUNATELY, we seem to avoid electing these WHACKO parties in the Victorian upper house
The worst WE could manage - was ONE from the old Catholic "black sheep" of the Labor Party family - the DLP come back to haunt us

WELCOME BACK MY DARLING.

Don’t let the media manipulate you. Use them, like they use you.

Could you clarify that buzz. You mean no seat won by the Greens in the lower house? because they do have seats in the upper house.

Well even an "Old Catholic Black Sheep"  is a thousand times better than a Green.

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 4:37pm:

Could you clarify that buzz. You mean no seat won by the Greens in the lower house? because they do have seats in the upper house.

It needs "CLARIFYING" ?

Despite polling WAY higher than the Fred Niles', the hunters and the Hansons - yhe Greens failed to win a new seat in the upper house (MLC's)

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 3:44pm:

I support the preferential system - and proportional representation - but there ARE oddities and DOWNSIDES to it Pauline Hanson 1.87% of the vote SEAT WON Christian Democrats 3.07% of the vote (down 1.35%) SEAT WON Shooters and Fishers 3.7% of the vote (down 0.91%) SEAT WON The Greens 10.89% of the vote (up 1.77%) NO SEAT WON http://www.abc.net.au/elections/nsw/2011/guide/lc-results.htm FORTUNATELY, we seem to avoid electing these WHACKO parties in the Victorian upper house The worst WE could manage - was ONE from the old Catholic "black sheep" of the Labor Party family - the DLP come back to haunt us

good misuse of statistics in the good ol' Gren tradition. These parties won seats in the UPPER HOUSE. The Greens ALSO won seats there. NONE of them won lower house seats - nor should they.

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 4:48pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:37pm: Could you clarify that buzz. You mean no seat won by the Greens in the lower house? because they do have seats in the upper house. It needs "CLARIFYING" ? Despite polling WAY higher than the Fred Niles', the hunters and the Hansons - yhe Greens failed to win a new seat in the upper house (MLC's)

so now it is NEW seats? damn you are hard to please you old fart!

nichy wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 4:45pm:

Well even an "Old Catholic Black Sheep"  is a thousand times better than a Green.

In the Victorian Election, the DLP cantidate was elected to the upper house on 1.6% of the vote
Beating the Greens' 10.5%

http://www.abc.net.au/elections/vic/2010/guide/emet.htm


(This is a result of the SAME flaw that saw Steve Fielding spend 8 years in Federal politics - in the Senate)

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 5:18pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:48pm: bogarde73 wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:37pm: Could you clarify that buzz. You mean no seat won by the Greens in the lower house? because they do have seats in the upper house. It needs "CLARIFYING" ? Despite polling WAY higher than the Fred Niles', the hunters and the Hansons - the Greens failed to win a new seat in the upper house (MLC's) so now it is NEW seats? damn you are hard to please you old fart!

I THINK it goes without saying, you are an OLDER (and somewhat more pungent) "fart" than I could aspire to be ?



The question comes DOWN to ...

"Should a Senator or MLC be elected for 6 to 8 years on a less than 2% result" ?

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 5:19pm:

nichy wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:45pm: Well even an "Old Catholic Black Sheep"  is a thousand times better than a Green. In the Victorian Election, the DLP cantidate was elected to the upper house on 1.6% of the vote Beating the Greens' 10.5% http://www.abc.net.au/elections/vic/2010/guide/emet.htm (This is a result of the SAME flaw that saw Steve Fielding spend 8 years in Federal politics - in the Senate)

so why dont we get rid of ALL PREFERNTIAL voting then since you dont like it! that way federally Labor will lose about 20 seats they get from Green preferences and probably all Green senators will disappear.

Oh thats right... your attitutude to preferential voting is like your attitude to polls...  You like it when it serves your purposes and not when it doesnt.

not a really credible opinion is it??

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 5:29pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 5:18pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:48pm: bogarde73 wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:37pm: Could you clarify that buzz. You mean no seat won by the Greens in the lower house? because they do have seats in the upper house. It needs "CLARIFYING" ? Despite polling WAY higher than the Fred Niles', the hunters and the Hansons - the Greens failed to win a new seat in the upper house (MLC's) so now it is NEW seats? damn you are hard to please you old fart! I THINK it goes without saying, you are an OLDER (and somewhat more pungent) "fart" than I could aspire to be ? The question comes DOWN to ... "Should a Senator or MLC be elected for 6 to 8 years on a less than 2% result" ?

i agree they shouldnt but it is not easy to change anything without messing up the entire process. but keep in mind that Adam Bandt was elected using just such an anomaly. Labor scored a LOT more of the primary vote than the Greens. Under any fair system Labor would have won that seat too. SO be careful what you wish for. If you want to try the rather lame argument that 'more voters actually wanted the Greens than labor' then remember that the same argument applies to Fielding.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 5:37pm:

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 5:19pm: nichy wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:45pm: Well even an "Old Catholic Black Sheep"  is a thousand times better than a Green. In the Victorian Election, the DLP cantidate was elected to the upper house on 1.6% of the vote Beating the Greens' 10.5% http://www.abc.net.au/elections/vic/2010/guide/emet.htm (This is a result of the SAME flaw that saw Steve Fielding spend 8 years in Federal politics - in the Senate) so why dont we get rid of ALL PREFERNTIAL voting then since you dont like it! that way federally Labor will lose about 20 seats they get from Green preferences and probably all Green senators will disappear. Oh thats right... your attitutude to preferential voting is like your attitude to polls...  You like it when it serves your purposes and not when it doesnt. not a really credible opinion is it??

The preferential system server us well with under a handful of cantidates
Obviously NOT so well, in a field of HUNDREDS

I would STILL support proportional representation in upper houses

eg ....

If a party gets 10% of the vote, I believe it should hold 10% of the seats in an upper house

But 1.5% equates to less than ONE


I ALSO believe, it's a system we are STUCK with
Just like State Governments

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 6:06pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 5:37pm: buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 5:19pm: nichy wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:45pm: Well even an "Old Catholic Black Sheep"  is a thousand times better than a Green. In the Victorian Election, the DLP cantidate was elected to the upper house on 1.6% of the vote Beating the Greens' 10.5% http://www.abc.net.au/elections/vic/2010/guide/emet.htm (This is a result of the SAME flaw that saw Steve Fielding spend 8 years in Federal politics - in the Senate) so why dont we get rid of ALL PREFERNTIAL voting then since you dont like it! that way federally Labor will lose about 20 seats they get from Green preferences and probably all Green senators will disappear. Oh thats right... your attitutude to preferential voting is like your attitude to polls...  You like it when it serves your purposes and not when it doesnt. not a really credible opinion is it?? The preferential system server us well with under a handful of cantidates Obviously NOT so well, in a field of HUNDREDS I would STILL support proportional representation in upper houses eg .... If a party gets 10% of the vote, I believe it should hold 10% of the seats in an upper house But 1.5% equates to less than ONE I ALSO believe, it's a system we are STUCK with Just like State Governments

and equal argument is that a party with 10% of the vote is NOT WANTED by a very very large number of people. 10% might merit being heard but certianly not 10% of the seats.

and if that applied then you would have to concede that Abbott with 500,000 MORE votes than Gillard should be PM.

But I thought you'd change your mind when you realised that thr Greens benefit from the preferential system while the major parties suffer from it.

Go pauline,  you good thing

She gets put last by everyone, she gets relentlessly smeared, she gets press that is universally bad, she gets fitted up and thrown in jail and still she gets up and has a go.
Good on her...hope she gets up.
;)

At least she'll liven up the Upper House,  even if it is by needing to have everything "explained"  

I agree with tonegunman1 -  she is one gutsy woman.

Well at least she will bring some colour back for a term or two.
Maybe that's why people voted for her?

nairbe wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 8:05pm:

Well at least she will bring some colour back for a term or two. Maybe that's why people voted for her?

I disagree with her on many levels but she is a conviction politician. The only convictions the NSW Labor party has is criminal ones. She is preferable to anyone in the NSW labor party or the Greens.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 8:16pm:

nairbe wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 8:05pm: Well at least she will bring some colour back for a term or two. Maybe that's why people voted for her? I disagree with her on many levels but she is a conviction politician. The only convictions the NSW Labor party has is criminal ones. She is preferable to anyone in the NSW labor party or the Greens.

Hmmnnn....but it's hard to know who she'll cause more trouble for, if she does scrape in - the Labs, Libs and/or Nats?

How will the new NSW Lib/Nat Govt handle her?

Heck, given the history, how will Abbott & Co handle her at the Federal level?

Equitist wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 8:23pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 8:16pm: nairbe wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 8:05pm: Well at least she will bring some colour back for a term or two. Maybe that's why people voted for her? I disagree with her on many levels but she is a conviction politician. The only convictions the NSW Labor party has is criminal ones. She is preferable to anyone in the NSW labor party or the Greens. Hmmnnn....but it's hard to know who she'll cause more trouble for, if she does scrape in - the Labs, Libs and/or Nats? How will the new NSW Lib/Nat Govt handle her? Heck, given the history, how will Abbott & Co handle her at the Federal level?

As Abbot was instrumental in having her falsely imprisoned I hope she
makes life miserable for the bastard.

Belgarion wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 8:29pm:

As Abbot was instrumental in having her falsely imprisoned I hope she makes life miserable for the bastard.

As much as I disagree with her politics, she was cynically-denied her basic civil and legal rights - and Abbott ought to have been brought before a court to answer charges for the self-serving role he played in her incarceration...

Imagine...8 more looooooooooong years of Pauline Hanson as an elected representative...

Equitist wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 9:04pm:

Imagine...8 more looooooooooong years of Pauline Hanson as an elected representative...

Yeah, isn't it great!
And thanks Pauline, that's "one for the gipper!" In fact many old "gippers" out here salute your grit!

GrandPaPa wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 8:12am:

Equitist wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 9:04pm: Imagine...8 more looooooooooong years of Pauline Hanson as an elected representative... Yeah, isn't it great! And thanks Pauline, that's "one for the gipper!" In fact many old "gippers" out here salute your grit!

Yea I read Viagra sales have gone up in the last couple of days, all those silly old farts pleasuring themselves with a pic of the gutter trash whore bag, Hanson. :P

skippy. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 8:20am:

GrandPaPa wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:12am: Equitist wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 9:04pm: Imagine...8 more looooooooooong years of Pauline Hanson as an elected representative... Yeah, isn't it great! And thanks Pauline, that's "one for the gipper!" In fact many old "gippers" out here salute your grit! Yea I read Viagra sales have gone up in the last couple of days, all those silly old farts pleasuring themselves with a pic of the gutter trash whore bag, Hanson. :P

Interesting you have such an interest in Viagra skippy...is it working ok for you? Perhaps not, judging by your strange need to inject your sexual frustrations into a political debate.....
Very odd behaviour indeed!

Quote:

Ms Hanson, Labor's Andrew Ferguson, and the Greens' Jeremy Buckingham are in a tight three-way race for the final Legislative Council seat, with Ms Hanson in the lead. The ABC election analyst, Antony Green, said she was unlikely to win, because the winner will probably be determined by the distribution of either Labor or Greens preferences.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

You'll all be pleased to know that she is now unlikely to get the seat.

Proportional representation is rubbish.

Basically the best form is voluntary voting based upon a first-past the post Westminster system.

At the moment, the fact you have nutcases like the Greens represented for whom 9 out of 10 people didn't vote, is ludicrous.

Just how much taxpayers money is this grub going to bank this time????
She certainly picked her demographic well, white 70+ population, wish for the days of white Australia would return, I mean you can't even walk down the street now without being assaulted by their strange cooking smells & those ones that wear curtains.......MY LORD.
They babble on in gibberish instead of the Queens English(probably planning to blow us up) & next thing you'll know is they'll want to build a mosque, imagine that wailing blasting out 5 times a day.........blah,blah,blah.
Nothing like scared old white people.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 8:55am:

Just how much taxpayers money is this grub going to bank this time???? She certainly picked her demographic well, white 70+ population, wish for the days of white Australia would return, I mean you can't even walk down the street now without being assaulted by their strange cooking smells & those ones that wear curtains.......MY LORD. They babble on in gibberish instead of the Queens English(probably planning to blow us up) & next thing you'll know is they'll want to build a mosque, imagine that wailing blasting out 5 times a day.........blah,blah,blah. Nothing like scared old white people.

That's a bit of a rant isn't it?
Are older Australians - who have rightly concerns about the fact they have paid into the country their whole lives and see foreigners turn up and get more than them - not entitled to their opinion?

They have, after all, done more for Australian than you or I.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 8:56am:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:55am: Just how much taxpayers money is this grub going to bank this time???? She certainly picked her demographic well, white 70+ population, wish for the days of white Australia would return, I mean you can't even walk down the street now without being assaulted by their strange cooking smells & those ones that wear curtains.......MY LORD. They babble on in gibberish instead of the Queens English(probably planning to blow us up) & next thing you'll know is they'll want to build a mosque, imagine that wailing blasting out 5 times a day.........blah,blah,blah. Nothing like scared old white people. That's a bit of a rant isn't it? Are older Australians - who have rightly concerns about the fact they have paid into the country their whole lives and see foreigners turn up and get more than them - not entitled to their opinion? They have, after all, done more for Australian than you or I.

Yes it was a bit of tongue in cheek ;)
Yes they are entitled to their opinion, can you prove your assertion foreigners get more, facts please not gossip, because I find that people who have more usually work bloody hard, something I note your usually in favour of.
And coming to your last statement, other than going to war(& there's not that many of them left) they have done no more than me except be born earlier, in fact I bet I'll will have paid MORE tax than most of them by the time I'm 70 & there probably won't even be a pension for me.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 8:55am:

Just how much taxpayers money is this grub going to bank this time???? She certainly picked her demographic well, white 70+ population, wish for the days of white Australia would return, I mean you can't even walk down the street now without being assaulted by their strange cooking smells & those ones that wear curtains.......MY LORD. They babble on in gibberish instead of the Queens English(probably planning to blow us up) & next thing you'll know is they'll want to build a mosque, imagine that wailing blasting out 5 times a day.........blah,blah,blah. Nothing like scared old white people.

You got something against White people?  Not factoring us in the current communist master race doctrine eh? :P :P :P

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 8:55am:

Just how much taxpayers money is this grub going to bank this time???? She certainly picked her demographic well, white 70+ population, wish for the days of white Australia would return, I mean you can't even walk down the street now without being assaulted by their strange cooking smells & those ones that wear curtains.......MY LORD. They babble on in gibberish instead of the Queens English(probably planning to blow us up) & next thing you'll know is they'll want to build a mosque, imagine that wailing blasting out 5 times a day.........blah,blah,blah. Nothing like scared old white people.

No, not "scared" just more than a little concerned. If you'd had the benefit of living in this country back when most immigrants would assimilate with similar ethnic and religious values you'd very likely take a different stance.

Go here for a little update on what concerns us, and if you then care to go stick your "all knowing" head back in the sand, be my guest. And if you think Australia possesses some "divine immunity" from the creeping chaos depicted in the video, I suggest you think again....

http://www.youtube.com/embed/A3YQANdvvbY

Well said Grandpapa. Fortunately the French now have a candidate in the Le Pen girl, who will give Sarkozy a run for his money and then maybe even knock over the socialist.
There is a limit to the level of invasion the people will eventually accept.

GrandPaPa wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 9:21am:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:55am: Just how much taxpayers money is this grub going to bank this time???? She certainly picked her demographic well, white 70+ population, wish for the days of white Australia would return, I mean you can't even walk down the street now without being assaulted by their strange cooking smells & those ones that wear curtains.......MY LORD. They babble on in gibberish instead of the Queens English(probably planning to blow us up) & next thing you'll know is they'll want to build a mosque, imagine that wailing blasting out 5 times a day.........blah,blah,blah. Nothing like scared old white people. No, not "scared" just more than a little concerned. If you'd had the benefit of living in this country back when most immigrants would assimilate with similar ethnic and religious values you'd very likely take a different stance. Go here for a little update on what concerns us, and if you then care to go stick your "all knowing" head back in the sand, be my guest. And if you think Australia possesses some "divine immunity" from the creeping chaos depicted in the video, I suggest you think again.... http://www.youtube.com/embed/A3YQANdvvbY

Dago's, Wogs, Chinks.
Is it true we have enclaves in every capital city?
Little Italy, Chinatown etc etc.
Is it true that enclaves were formed because of the people being ostracised by the broader community?
Were they ostracised because they ate funny foods, wore different clothes, spoke a different language at home & to each other in the street, had accents, had their own spiritual beliefs?
Is that what's happening now?

Thanks bogarde, and let's just hope this country wakes up before we are ourselves forced to that limit.

You don't see the problem smithy or you don't want to see it. A lot of people don't. It's quite obvious overseas and it CAN happen here.
The Islamic Republic of Yorkshire is not a fantasy.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 9:34am:

GrandPaPa wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:21am: Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:55am: Just how much taxpayers money is this grub going to bank this time???? She certainly picked her demographic well, white 70+ population, wish for the days of white Australia would return, I mean you can't even walk down the street now without being assaulted by their strange cooking smells & those ones that wear curtains.......MY LORD. They babble on in gibberish instead of the Queens English(probably planning to blow us up) & next thing you'll know is they'll want to build a mosque, imagine that wailing blasting out 5 times a day.........blah,blah,blah. Nothing like scared old white people. No, not "scared" just more than a little concerned. If you'd had the benefit of living in this country back when most immigrants would assimilate with similar ethnic and religious values you'd very likely take a different stance. Go here for a little update on what concerns us, and if you then care to go stick your "all knowing" head back in the sand, be my guest. And if you think Australia possesses some "divine immunity" from the creeping chaos depicted in the video, I suggest you think again.... http://www.youtube.com/embed/A3YQANdvvbY Dago's, Wogs, Chinks. Is it true we have enclaves in every capital city? Little Italy, Chinatown etc etc. Is it true that enclaves were formed because of the people being ostracised by the broader community? Were they ostracised because they ate funny foods, wore different clothes, spoke a different language at home & to each other in the street, had accents, had their own spiritual beliefs? Is that what's happening now?

Your words just prove what I said about your not understanding what multiculturalism USED to be like!

Yes, much of what you describe was the case, but you seem unable to grasp the obvious fact that NONE of these minorities came here with any intent to fundamentally change Australian secular society!

If you're so blind that you refuse to see that's happening here (refer 60 minutes last Sunday week for one example) and more so in Europe, then once more....get your head back in the sand where it clearly belongs!

Gotta love the "people came here with similar ethnicity and culture, but people from the Middle East are just so different and they don't understand our ways" argument.  Pretty sure back in the 80's everyone was crying about the Vietnamese.  And before then we invented the derogatory term of "WOG."

Aha. The same rubbish argument from the same rubbish people. Nothing new.

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 9:40am:

You don't see the problem smithy or you don't want to see it. A lot of people don't. It's quite obvious overseas and it CAN happen here. The Islamic Republic of Yorkshire is not a fantasy.

I believe that people like Hanson play to peoples fears not because she has any political or religious bent but for tax dollars nothing more.
Look how she election shops, people complain when the Labor party parachutes someone not local into a seat.........HELLO.....last I heard she was trying to flog her taxpayer bought sunshine coast property so she could move/immigrate(oh the irony) to Britian.

This is a thread about HANSON not radical Islam of which I have grave concerns as well, but fear and intolerance will benefit no one and that's what she peddles.

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 9:55am:

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:40am: You don't see the problem smithy or you don't want to see it. A lot of people don't. It's quite obvious overseas and it CAN happen here. The Islamic Republic of Yorkshire is not a fantasy. I believe that people like Hanson play to peoples fears not because she has any political or religious bent but for tax dollars nothing more. Look how she election shops, people complain when the Labor party parachutes someone not local into a seat.........HELLO.....last I heard she was trying to flog her taxpayer bought sunshine coast property so she could move/immigrate(oh the irony) to Britian. This is a thread about HANSON not radical Islam of which I have grave concerns as well, but fear and intolerance will benefit no one and that's what she peddles.

When I drive through Easton or Eastville in Bristol now, I become quite annoyed.
It is England and there is not a single English person about!!!!

Just to link in to your Britain point.

I guess my annoyance is that none of these people attempt to mingle.

Take my old uni mate from the UK who moved to Melbourne a few years back.
Now aside from playing 5 a side soccer with the rest of us English lads on a tuesday night at Albert Park - he moved to South Yarra, had Aussie friends, an Aussie girlfriend, went to the AFL, went out on fridays and saturdays with Aussies etc etc.

Now compare that to one of this lot from Sudan. How well do they mingle?

That is my point. They are divisive for the country.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 10:19am:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:55am: bogarde73 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:40am: You don't see the problem smithy or you don't want to see it. A lot of people don't. It's quite obvious overseas and it CAN happen here. The Islamic Republic of Yorkshire is not a fantasy. I believe that people like Hanson play to peoples fears not because she has any political or religious bent but for tax dollars nothing more. Look how she election shops, people complain when the Labor party parachutes someone not local into a seat.........HELLO.....last I heard she was trying to flog her taxpayer bought sunshine coast property so she could move/immigrate(oh the irony) to Britian. This is a thread about HANSON not radical Islam of which I have grave concerns as well, but fear and intolerance will benefit no one and that's what she peddles. When I drive through Easton or Eastville in Bristol now, I become quite annoyed. It is England and there is not a single English person about!!!! Just to link in to your Britain point. I guess my annoyance is that none of these people attempt to mingle. Take my old uni mate from the UK who moved to Melbourne a few years back. Now aside from playing 5 a side soccer with the rest of us English lads on a tuesday night at Albert Park - he moved to South Yarra, had Aussie friends, an Aussie girlfriend, went to the AFL, went out on fridays and saturdays with Aussies etc etc. Now compare that to one of this lot from Sudan. How well do they mingle? That is my point. They are divisive for the country.

Oh? When was the last time you drove through Easton or Eastville?

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 10:35am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 10:19am: Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:55am: bogarde73 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:40am: You don't see the problem smithy or you don't want to see it. A lot of people don't. It's quite obvious overseas and it CAN happen here. The Islamic Republic of Yorkshire is not a fantasy. I believe that people like Hanson play to peoples fears not because she has any political or religious bent but for tax dollars nothing more. Look how she election shops, people complain when the Labor party parachutes someone not local into a seat.........HELLO.....last I heard she was trying to flog her taxpayer bought sunshine coast property so she could move/immigrate(oh the irony) to Britian. This is a thread about HANSON not radical Islam of which I have grave concerns as well, but fear and intolerance will benefit no one and that's what she peddles. When I drive through Easton or Eastville in Bristol now, I become quite annoyed. It is England and there is not a single English person about!!!! Just to link in to your Britain point. I guess my annoyance is that none of these people attempt to mingle. Take my old uni mate from the UK who moved to Melbourne a few years back. Now aside from playing 5 a side soccer with the rest of us English lads on a tuesday night at Albert Park - he moved to South Yarra, had Aussie friends, an Aussie girlfriend, went to the AFL, went out on fridays and saturdays with Aussies etc etc. Now compare that to one of this lot from Sudan. How well do they mingle? That is my point. They are divisive for the country. Oh? When was the last time you drove through Easton or Eastville?

Christmas time.
All I saw was Muslims and Somalians.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 10:43am:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 10:35am: Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 10:19am: Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:55am: bogarde73 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:40am: You don't see the problem smithy or you don't want to see it. A lot of people don't. It's quite obvious overseas and it CAN happen here. The Islamic Republic of Yorkshire is not a fantasy. I believe that people like Hanson play to peoples fears not because she has any political or religious bent but for tax dollars nothing more. Look how she election shops, people complain when the Labor party parachutes someone not local into a seat.........HELLO.....last I heard she was trying to flog her taxpayer bought sunshine coast property so she could move/immigrate(oh the irony) to Britian. This is a thread about HANSON not radical Islam of which I have grave concerns as well, but fear and intolerance will benefit no one and that's what she peddles. When I drive through Easton or Eastville in Bristol now, I become quite annoyed. It is England and there is not a single English person about!!!! Just to link in to your Britain point. I guess my annoyance is that none of these people attempt to mingle. Take my old uni mate from the UK who moved to Melbourne a few years back. Now aside from playing 5 a side soccer with the rest of us English lads on a tuesday night at Albert Park - he moved to South Yarra, had Aussie friends, an Aussie girlfriend, went to the AFL, went out on fridays and saturdays with Aussies etc etc. Now compare that to one of this lot from Sudan. How well do they mingle? That is my point. They are divisive for the country. Oh? When was the last time you drove through Easton or Eastville? Christmas time. All I saw was Muslims and Somalians.

Maybe because it was Christmas time?

;D ;D ;D

No, it's because the idiotic immigration policy that Britain has followed since the 1960s has left us with a chaotic state that within the next decade in Leicester and Bradford there will be more Muslim voters than British people.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 10:57am:

No, it's because the idiotic immigration policy that Britain has followed since the 1960s has left us with a chaotic state that within the next decade in Leicester and Bradford there will be more Muslim voters than British people.

Or it could be that it was Christmas time.

;D ;D ;D

You really are an idiot.

I can't be bothered addressing any of your points anymore.

Suffice to say why you, a Russian, take such an involvement in immigration is obvious.

A few weeks after Christmas I was waiting for the bus to Oxford across the road from the Sherlock Holmes statue on Baker Street in London. Without seeing that statue, you could have been forgiven for thinking that you were somewhere on the Nigerian/Pakistani border!
The sales were over...

:o

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 9:34am:

Dago's, Wogs, Chinks. Is it true we have enclaves in every capital city? Little Italy, Chinatown etc etc. Is it true that enclaves were formed because of the people being ostracised by the broader community?NO Were they ostracised because they ate funny foods, wore different clothes, spoke a different language at home & to each other in the street, had accents, had their own spiritual beliefs?NO Is that what's happening now?NO

If you want to compare Norton st and Chinatown to Bankstown and Lakemba maybe even Auburn then we can see the difference.

Norton st and Chinatown are very popular these people make you feel welcome how many people bother going to Bankstown-Lakemba-Auburn to experience multiculturalism?

These dagos wogs and chinks as you called them all integrated into Australia they did not segregate their women from Australians and we have many marriages between these cultures.
Aussies marry these dagos wogs and chinks as you called them.

A muslim woman is forbidden to marry a non muslim so the Islamic ideology does not promote integration.
These muslim migrants will not fit in like the others because their belief calls for segregation of believers and non believers.

So how can muslim women integrate into Australia when they cannot marry the locals because they are not following the delusion called Islam?

One of the 5 pillars of Islam is Hajj which is a trip to the homeland of Islam in Saudi Arabia where you look at a rock in a vagina and throw some stones at satan.

Mecca or Makkah is off limits to non muslims there is a death penalty for non muslims caught there.

Islam promotes a sexual apartheid in regard to womens rights and if you are a non muslim you are worthless in Islam.

http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/1751/mecca.jpg

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 11:02am:

You really are an idiot. I can't be bothered addressing any of your points anymore. Suffice to say why you, a Russian, take such an involvement in immigration is obvious.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

I still don't quite understand how that is meant to be offensive.  Oooh I'm a Russian.  

Are you jealous?  You poor retarded bugger :(  Someone's gone loopty-loop I see. ;D

Soren wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 11:03am:

A few weeks after Christmas I was waiting for the bus to Oxford across the road from the Sherlock Holmes statue on Baker Street in London. Without seeing that statue, you could have been forgiven for thinking that you were somewhere on the Nigerian/Pakistani border! The sales were over... :o

Nigerian/Pakistani border?

Wow, now we really know who we're dealing with here...
;D ;D ;D ;D

skippy. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 8:20am:

GrandPaPa wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:12am: Equitist wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 9:04pm: Imagine...8 more looooooooooong years of Pauline Hanson as an elected representative... Yeah, isn't it great! And thanks Pauline, that's "one for the gipper!" In fact many old "gippers" out here salute your grit! Yea I read Viagra sales have gone up in the last couple of days, all those silly old farts pleasuring themselves with a pic of the gutter trash whore bag, Hanson. :P

When are you going to ban this rabbit

FRED. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 12:50pm:

skippy. wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:20am: GrandPaPa wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:12am: Equitist wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 9:04pm: Imagine...8 more looooooooooong years of Pauline Hanson as an elected representative... Yeah, isn't it great! And thanks Pauline, that's "one for the gipper!" In fact many old "gippers" out here salute your grit! Yea I read Viagra sales have gone up in the last couple of days, all those silly old farts pleasuring themselves with a pic of the gutter trash whore bag, Hanson. :P When are you going to ban this rabbit

No body gets banned for telling the truth,FWEDO. ;D ;D ;D

skippy. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 12:57pm:

FRED. wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 12:50pm: skippy. wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:20am: GrandPaPa wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 8:12am: Equitist wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 9:04pm: Imagine...8 more looooooooooong years of Pauline Hanson as an elected representative... Yeah, isn't it great! And thanks Pauline, that's "one for the gipper!" In fact many old "gippers" out here salute your grit! Yea I read Viagra sales have gone up in the last couple of days, all those silly old farts pleasuring themselves with a pic of the gutter trash whore bag, Hanson. :P When are you going to ban this rabbit No body gets banned for telling the truth,FWEDO. ;D ;D ;D

Then if that's the case, perhaps there should be a blanket ban on imbeciles......
That should see you gone!!

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 10:19am:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:55am: bogarde73 wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 9:40am: You don't see the problem smithy or you don't want to see it. A lot of people don't. It's quite obvious overseas and it CAN happen here. The Islamic Republic of Yorkshire is not a fantasy. I believe that people like Hanson play to peoples fears not because she has any political or religious bent but for tax dollars nothing more. Look how she election shops, people complain when the Labor party parachutes someone not local into a seat.........HELLO.....last I heard she was trying to flog her taxpayer bought sunshine coast property so she could move/immigrate(oh the irony) to Britian. This is a thread about HANSON not radical Islam of which I have grave concerns as well, but fear and intolerance will benefit no one and that's what she peddles. When I drive through Easton or Eastville in Bristol now, I become quite annoyed. It is England and there is not a single English person about!!!! Just to link in to your Britain point. I guess my annoyance is that none of these people attempt to mingle. Take my old uni mate from the UK who moved to Melbourne a few years back. Now aside from playing 5 a side soccer with the rest of us English lads on a tuesday night at Albert Park - he moved to South Yarra, had Aussie friends, an Aussie girlfriend, went to the AFL, went out on fridays and saturdays with Aussies etc etc. Now compare that to one of this lot from Sudan. How well do they mingle? That is my point. They are divisive for the country.

A few points to consider.

1. Just because someone is black, or Muslim, it doesn't make them not English.

2. Your uni mate... what are his finances like compared to that of a Sudanese migrant? What was his support structure like?

3. One word. Rockingham. Another word. Joondalup. A final word. Brighton. These are suburbs that, in some way or another, resemble a slightly thicker version of Heartbeat (or it's slightly deranged cousin Midsomer Murders).

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 10:57am:

No, it's because the idiotic immigration policy that Britain has followed since the 1960s has left us with a chaotic state that within the next decade in Leicester and Bradford there will be more Muslim voters than British people.

There has been 6 Conservative Prime Minister compare to 5 labour Prime Minister of Britian since 1960. So andrei you can blame the Conservative more then Labour for immigration troubles in Britian.

Quote:

Then if that's the case, perhaps there should be a blanket ban on imbeciles...... That should see you gone

If that were the case you'd have never been allowed to join our forum to begin with, princess whinesalot. :-*

skippy. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 2:49pm:

Quote: Then if that's the case, perhaps there should be a blanket ban on imbeciles...... That should see you gone If that were the case you'd have never been allowed to join our forum to begin with, princess whinesalot. :-*

If we add up all your contributions of the last 3 months.
Do you think we would be able to form one worthwhile paragraph?

Your entire mode du jour seems to be just aggression and abuse everyday.
You seem to have very little to add which is either sensible or worth anyone's time reading.

Just a thought my old Aussie friend.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 2:53pm:

skippy. wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 2:49pm: Quote: Then if that's the case, perhaps there should be a blanket ban on imbeciles...... That should see you gone If that were the case you'd have never been allowed to join our forum to begin with, princess whinesalot. :-* If we add up all your contributions of the last 3 months. Do you think we would be able to form one worthwhile paragraph? Your entire mode du jour seems to be just aggression and abuse everyday. You seem to have very little to add which is either sensible or worth anyone's time reading. Just a thought my old Aussie friend.

I'd prefer you didn't hang off my every word I write, but alas you never seem to be able to get enough of it. You follow me around like a lost little puppy dog. :P

Why do rightards bitch so much?
They seem to think its OK to hand it out but cry like little babies when they get it back. I say if you don't like our forum, you are more than welcome to leave, you wouldn't be missed, by anyone. :'( :'( :'(

buzzanddidj wrote on Mar 29^th, 2011 at 4:48pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 4:37pm: Could you clarify that buzz. You mean no seat won by the Greens in the lower house? because they do have seats in the upper house. It needs "CLARIFYING" ? Despite polling WAY higher than the Fred Niles', the hunters and the Hansons - yhe Greens failed to win a new seat in the upper house (MLC's)

Yes buzz, but how many candidates did each of those groups run???

Hanson ran for ONE seat (for example), but the Greens ran candidates for a whole lot of seats...so the Greens 10.**% (10.89?) is spread across  maybe 20 seats....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 30^th, 2011 at 2:53pm:

skippy. wrote on Mar 30th, 2011 at 2:49pm: Quote: Then if that's the case, perhaps there should be a blanket ban on imbeciles...... That should see you gone If that were the case you'd have never been allowed to join our forum to begin with, princess whinesalot. :-* If we add up all your contributions of the last 3 months. Do you think we would be able to form one worthwhile paragraph? Your entire mode du jour seems to be just aggression and abuse everyday. You seem to have very little to add which is either sensible or worth anyone's time reading. Just a thought my old Aussie friend.

LOL, if we add up your contributions for the past 3 months we get:

"I don't like islam, they are dirty and I am much better than to associate with them so they can stay where they are.  I am after all of commonwealth blood.  Life is easy, they can work it out."

"What I don't understand is why I should have to pay tax. I, as a middle income earner on 300,000 a year, should be able to receive subsidies from the government."

"I am a centrist who hates non-white people, believes them to be of lower class than me, wants the country to run like a large corporation and thinks all low income earners are whingers. Life is so easy."

"My daddy didn't get sacked!  It was deceit! Stop talking about it!"

"Energy costs too much but I don't want to do anything about it."

"I like air conditioning"

add in a few personal stories here and there that mean absolutely nothing and then we can just repeat all the rest in the same order 5 times a day, and we get your entire contribution for the past 3 months. Hip hip, hooray.