Australian Politics Forum | |
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Relationships >> Long distance relationships http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1300845714 Message started by Lisa on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 12:01pm |
Title: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 12:01pm
.. are high risk and hardly ever work out.
Do you agree/disagree? If so/why .. if not/why not? |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by WESLEY.PIPES on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 12:13pm
They are stupid, and most often the people involved are just too scared to let go.
|
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 12:15pm
Too scared to let go of what Wesley?
The fear of the unknown? The fear of leaving everything behind and making the move? |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by bobbythebat1 on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 12:37pm Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 12:15pm:
Leaving a steady job is the biggest problem. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 1:32pm Bobby. wrote on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 12:37pm:
Yes. That's quite true Bobby. Leaving behind all your family and friends is another very big problem too. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by bobbythebat1 on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 1:55pm Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 1:32pm:
Family & friends are only as far away as an email or phone call. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 9:23pm
Hmm .. a hard one Bobby.
It would be difficult to say that to a girl who's old fashioned, family oriented and European. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 24th, 2011 at 5:00am
What about all those 'love' encounters that started with 'pen-pal' like situations in the old days - some as far as the other side of the world?
I think it extrodinary that 'love' should blossom from writing in such a way. These days the "email" and internet tend to replace that manner of attachment over long distances. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 24th, 2011 at 6:57pm
All that does help to sustain the relationship but only for a limited time Jas.
|
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by bobbythebat1 on Mar 24th, 2011 at 10:55pm Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 9:23pm:
It depends how close you really want to be to your family. I have personally lost contact with most members of my family. As you get older your interests separate - you don't have anything in common & they aren't interested in anything your doing & vica versa. Sometimes it's better to get on with your own life & leave the nest for good. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Sprintcyclist on Mar 24th, 2011 at 11:45pm while maintaining a long distance reatonship you cannot form a short distance one. When you are chatting to someone who might be a male in france, you will NOT meet the guy walking his dog down your local park. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Foolosophy on Mar 25th, 2011 at 12:01am Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 24th, 2011 at 11:45pm:
The laws of quantum physics and some aspects of String THeory says that you can try and keep up with the latest developments |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Sprintcyclist on Mar 25th, 2011 at 12:11am i'm over "the latest developments" it doesn't work for me, I'm not interested If you want to meet someone, join the local club in something you are interested in. You'll meet local real people who ALSO like playing backgammon or chess or bush walks or whatever. And that's immesurably better than a virtual anything. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Foolosophy on Mar 25th, 2011 at 12:19am Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 25th, 2011 at 12:11am:
true nothing like organic flirting unless its only sex youre after then I suppose a dedicated forum for that sort of thing would work - a virtual brothel |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 25th, 2011 at 7:42am
You're right in a way Lisa - it does 'sustain' the relationship.
But what 'relationship' are we talking about? Are we talking about the 'Eve' relationship in regards to 'physical' contact (sex) and having children? Or the 'Lilith' relationship in regards to 'mental' and creating something like what Dante found in Beatrice which resulted in the immortal "Divine Comedy"? (I think Daniel Day-Lewis found the Lilith in Michelle Pfeiffer but Eve in Winona Ryder in a movie called "A Room with a View" ...i think?) Dave Stewart and Annie Lennox with Eurythmics. Christopher Dean and Jane Torville with IceSkating. If it were akin to the 'Lilithian', then long-distance is easily sustained and blossoms more-so thanks to the Internet. ...as for having a 'procreative' relationship in regards to kiddies, then long-distance ain't the go I guess. I like this saying: What do you get with a... Smart Man & a Smart Woman = Romance Smart Man & a Dumb Woman = Affair Dumb Man & a Smart Woman = Marriage Dumb Man & a Dumb Woman = Pregnant ;D ...Some people can consider this the x4 stages in their Relationships while others just stick with the one in a state of being. The best Romance is never a sexual one. ;) |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Foolosophy on Mar 25th, 2011 at 9:53am It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Mar 25th, 2011 at 7:42am:
Are you a virgin? |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 25th, 2011 at 10:23am
No.
But I have deflowered or liberated a 40 year old female virgin. ;) |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Foolosophy on Mar 25th, 2011 at 10:42am It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Mar 25th, 2011 at 10:23am:
and long did that process take - give or take a minute ?? |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 25th, 2011 at 2:08pm
I'm not 'fooled' by your need for erotic perverseness by default via this Forum, Topic, Post, etc.
|
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 26th, 2011 at 10:10am It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Mar 25th, 2011 at 10:23am:
I did NOT have sex with that man :P Speaking of which .. anyone know where Clinton is these days? |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 27th, 2011 at 8:50am
I don't think it was you either Lisa,
...I was 10 years the junior too ;) We all know that young (female) virgins are like "locked doors", but when they are like 40 years of age on that level, its like 'locked' and with wooden planks nailed across the door. After the 7 months relationship, my liberated older girlfriend wanted to 'play the field' a bit, by which time I was most sad as I really had grown attached to her. :( She is happily married now, I've last heard. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 28th, 2011 at 12:07pm It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Mar 27th, 2011 at 8:50am:
10 years OLDER than you? I've never been able to understand men with older women. Younger women .. yes .. but with OLDER women?? Sheesh .. and SHE was the one who then cheated on you?? Ahh well she is happily married now .. and I am assuming you are too. All's well that ends well then? |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Foolosophy on Mar 28th, 2011 at 10:23pm Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 28th, 2011 at 12:07pm:
Yes, true love must be dependent on superficial factors only - like age difference ;D |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 29th, 2011 at 9:24am
Since when was age a superficial factor?
It's a very imp't consideration in my opinion. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 29th, 2011 at 10:48am
Your age reflects your life stage, maturity, experience, state of health .. etc.
It is impt .. and a very impt consideration as I said above. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 29th, 2011 at 11:06am
Why do people like blondes who lay there like starfishes,
while other's prefer rangas that go like the clackers?? Why do people prefer skinny girls, others volumptuous?? Why do others prefer much taller women, while others prefer shorter women?? Why do some prefer women just for procreation, while others prefer women just for pleasure?? ...my interactions with some older women were based entirely upon 'character' and 'company' rather than age and looks. I also never needed 'money' as Toy-Boys tend to do. I never considered passing the 'retired' threshold though :P just like I would never pass the 'minor' threshold with the youngsters. :P |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 29th, 2011 at 11:27am
I guess we see things differently (and for all sorts of reasons too).
As a woman .. I'd feel uncomfortable being with a younger man. He would be at a different stage in life .. and this would affect/reflect his expectations of me and our future. Mind you .. being with an older men can yield the same sorts of problems too. Being at the same age (give or take a yr or 2) and thus stage in life tends to engender more compatibility IMO. Well that's how I see it. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 29th, 2011 at 1:57pm
Depends, you might find the younger male far more 'mature' than a male your age or older, or that he just happens to be far more 'endowed' than a male your age or older, taller, richer, mentally stable, etc.
I mean, would you be with someone of your own race although they are a pathetic specimen, rather than someone of higher quality from another race?? I found that when it came to relationships: I tried not to be too choosey because although she may not have been Miss Right, she was definately Miss Right Now. ;) Sometimes older women date younger males because they 'sexually awaken' them a bit. Its no different to an older male teaching a younger female how to learn a musical instrument towards good things. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 29th, 2011 at 3:51pm
Sometimes older women date younger males because they 'sexually awaken' them a bit.
- Jas I'm laughing at this sentence Jas. One of the reasons why I've always preferred older men is because THEY know more/have experienced more and as such have been able to sexually awaken me. And not only sexually .. but intellectually too. For me .. an older, intelligent man has always been an absolute turn on. Not sure if you know .. but at age 20 I was married to a 40 yr old lawyer. It's amazing how we perceive things hey lol :) |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 29th, 2011 at 3:55pm
I found that when it came to relationships: I tried not to be too choosey because although she may not have been Miss Right, she was definately Miss Right Now
- Jas Oh ok. I'm pretty traditional and as such I'm more into permanent arrangements. Also for me .. a man has to be a potential Mr Right to get me to really notice him. If he isn't a potential candidate .. he will become and remain Mr Friend Only. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 29th, 2011 at 3:56pm
I'm married to a much younger female, but I don't think I could have "shown her a thing or two" in regards to sex if I was still a virgin.
|
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Mar 30th, 2011 at 1:30pm
There's so much "STUFF" on sex out there these days Jas so it's easy to learn about techniques etc.
Having said that .. I've never been with a male virgin. And I don't think I'd want to either. It would feel too awkward for me. Well that's my opinion in any event. Interesting to note that you're now married to a much younger female given our discussion in this topic lol :) |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by mantra on Mar 30th, 2011 at 2:30pm It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Mar 29th, 2011 at 1:57pm:
I agree. I think the younger man has a lot to offer the more mature woman and vice versa. Men of a similar age tend to be getting a bit bored with life - and the same can apply to the woman, but a younger partner is often more sensitive, receptive and prepared to take chances. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Mar 31st, 2011 at 11:19pm
Agree with you Mantra. I really had some great friendships and relationships with older women. We always found something better to connect with than just a difference of age.
I must say that I am dissapointed in women who feel the need for plastic surgery. It is really sad when women fail to recognise the 'beauty' that comes from within eventually. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Apr 4th, 2011 at 11:06am
I must say that I am disappointed in women who feel the need for plastic surgery. It is really sad when women fail to recognize the 'beauty' that comes from within eventually.
- Jas Interesting remarks Jas. My gorgeous hairdresser is my age ie 40 and she "looks" 27. Not much of her is real though .. and she is enslaved to the never ending process of procedure after procedure in an attempt to MAINTAIN previous work done. She isn't happy (well that is what she tells me). Food for thought hey. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Sappho on Apr 4th, 2011 at 12:19pm
Well, I think it depends on the cosmetic surgery that's being done. My best friend who had twins... had her stomach apron removed and she feels much better for it. I've had my breasts tidied up and enlarged from a b to a c cup and I feel great for it.
As to the face however... I'm not a fan. The look is nearly always plastic and expressions which make you, you, are lost. But again, if my eye lids began to drop and sag, I would correct that for cosmetic and practical reasons. It just depends on what you are doing it for... a tidy up or a make over. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Apr 4th, 2011 at 1:23pm
Thats the problem with this (over-populated) planet. No-one knows how to "grow old gracefully". The fear of such a death is twisting and rotting people from within.
I understand the need of a breast reduction, in regards to back-pain. Such a job is justified. But to go through such 'vain' acts for just looking younger is just pathetic. EG: Working in South-West Private Hospital. Case of two patients. One patient was 40-50 years of age and just recieved a Face-lift,etc. The other was a little old lady. For some reason, most staff preferred to attend to the buzzer of the little old lady, rather than the face-lift lady. Why? Because the little old lady with all her wrinkles was expressing a beauty that comes from the inside. The lady with the face-lift had the most hideous personality and ugly attitude - pure vanity. Look beautiful and young for older people, not beautiful and young for younger people. When I work with younger guys - I feel and act older/wiser. When I work with older guys - I feel and act younger/stronger. I play it as it comes with every day. I don't try to set it in stone like a control freak. Most of these 'operations' and Medical procedures are emanating out of the USA (famed for ecstacy and crack, etc) . A nation that is more apt at winning wars than practicing good Medicine. Its a shame Australia follows such a nation Medically - just because they speak the same language ::) - pity really, because other (non-anglo saxon) nations speak English too and the USA is considered a 3rd World Medical nation. You don't see 1st World Medical nations like Switzerland, Cuba, Germany, Sweden endorse such pathetic operations. Grow old gracefully my dears. People will love you more for it in the long run when it matters most. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by mantra on Apr 4th, 2011 at 4:15pm
That was very thoughtfully written Jasignature.
It's amazing the risks some people take by putting themselves under the knife and anaesthetic for vanity - but each to their own. Obviously insecurity plays a big part in wanting to change your appearance, but being confident comes from within - not from the mask you wear. I think those who are cosmetically enhanced look far worse in advanced years than if they had grown old gracefully. There always seems to be a body part on display that doesn't quite match the rest of them - reminiscent of something preserved in formaldehyde. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Apr 5th, 2011 at 12:39am
Delta Goodrem and that other UK dude have finally split. They blame distance, career, etc.
I guess Long Distance Relationships are a rare thing to achieve these days. Funny though - there are many couples getting together from a long distance originally because of such things as the Internet. USA woman marries NZ man thanks to Online Dating, etc. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Apr 6th, 2011 at 1:08pm
Forget overseas relationships (I've been there so I know just how IMPOSSIBLE the situation is) .. even interstate relationships can be a bugger. Someone STILL has to make the move eventually. And that can be a REAL headache.
It's much easier to find/fall in love with someone who lives in your own city. What a pity LOVE doesn't work on that principle all the time. |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Jasignature on Apr 8th, 2011 at 2:21am
Dante Allegheri never needed to 'be with' Beatrice. His love for her, he poured into his famous "The Divine Comedy" books. He married another woman to share his house, bed, children, etc. Beatrice married someone else, etc.
You can have a long distance 'relationship' with a woman, but I doubt it will be a sexual one. It doesn't need to be sexual to be love does it? |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Apr 9th, 2011 at 2:30pm It_is_the_Darkness wrote on Apr 8th, 2011 at 2:21am:
Being Beatrice AS WELL AS his wife and the mother of his children = my dream/objective/heart's desire. I know .. I want it all lol :) |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by mrhammerhead on Apr 15th, 2011 at 2:02am Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 23rd, 2011 at 12:01pm:
I've done long distance relationship before and I thought it was a good idea having my gf in some other country and while I was here doing mr-nice-guy and not giving in to temptation but what the heck, it was just a waste since I've heard and seen on her pics she was hanging out with some person whom she meet and I was really pissed because of that since she removed her status on facebook to single instead of in relationship with.. So after that I never engaged in long distance relationship |
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by shaney on Apr 22nd, 2011 at 7:32pm
I don't believe in a long distance relationships. Both of you needs someone to be there always not just an imagination
|
Title: Re: Long distance relationships Post by Lisa on Apr 22nd, 2011 at 11:59pm
I think long distance relationships have extra hurdles to overcome.
I thank God that my husband and I originally lived close to each other. It just made everything so much easier for us .. esp at the beginning. |
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved. |