Libya's Gaddafi could find refuge in Israel

Monday, February 21, 2011 | Ryan Jones

Libya's Gaddafi could find refuge in Israel

Israel’s Channel 2 News last year interviewed two Israeli women of Libyan origin who claimed to be distant relatives of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

The older of the two interviewees, Guita Brown, said she is Gaddafi’s second cousin (Brown’s grandmother was the sister of Gaddafi’s grandmother). The younger of the two women, Rachel Saada, granddaughter of Brown, explained in more detail:

“The story goes that Gaddafi’s grandmother, herself a Jewess, was married to a Jewish man at first. But he treated her badly, so she ran away and married a Muslim sheikh. Their child was the mother of Gaddafi.”

While Gaddafi’s grandmother converted to Islam when she married the sheikh, according to Jewish religious law (and common sense), she was ethnically still Jewish.

At this point the news anchor stated, “So, the point is that Gaddafi doesn’t just have Jewish relatives, he is Jewish!”

Rumors of Gaddafi’s Jewish background are nothing new. But with the current uprising in Libya that threatens to ultimately overthrow the dictator, as has happened in the neighboring countries of Tunisia and Egypt, Gaddafi may be looking for an exit strategy.

If the story told by Brown and Saada is true, Gaddafi is entitled to immigrate to Israel as a Jew under Israel’s Law of Return. Even if every other country on earth refused him entry, Israel would be obligated by its own laws to take Gaddafi in.

At the time of the interview, the anchor quipped, “I am sure there is some local authority in Israel that would be pleased to have a former president on its staff.”

Source: Israel Today

Ah the irony!

He certainly could go to Israel, and then be in time for his appointment in the International Court in the Hague to answer for his crimes.

Nonsense. The people of Libya love their leader. He shall remain insh'allah.

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 3^rd, 2011 at 2:02pm:

He certainly could go to Israel, and then be in time for his appointment in the International Court in the Hague to answer for his crimes.

lol, in Israel he will be protected, along with all the other war criminals PM's Israel had.

Israel...one of the last countries that make hero's out of war criminals.

Lestat wrote on Mar 4^th, 2011 at 7:10am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 3rd, 2011 at 2:02pm: He certainly could go to Israel, and then be in time for his appointment in the International Court in the Hague to answer for his crimes. lol, in Israel he will be protected, along with all the other war criminals PM's Israel had. Israel...one of the last countries that make hero's out of war criminals.

He would receive as much protection their as he would in the US.

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 4^th, 2011 at 10:56am:

Lestat wrote on Mar 4th, 2011 at 7:10am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 3rd, 2011 at 2:02pm: He certainly could go to Israel, and then be in time for his appointment in the International Court in the Hague to answer for his crimes. lol, in Israel he will be protected, along with all the other war criminals PM's Israel had. Israel...one of the last countries that make hero's out of war criminals. He would receive as much protection their as he would in the US.

hehe, yep, another country that has been known to protect war criminals.

Where did all those Nazi scientists end up...you know, the ones that experimented on your own people.

Paperclip anyone?

So thats the reason for all this drama in Libya...The JOOS did it...... ;D

Lestat wrote on Mar 11^th, 2011 at 8:37am:

chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 4th, 2011 at 10:56am: Lestat wrote on Mar 4th, 2011 at 7:10am: chicken_lipsforme wrote on Mar 3rd, 2011 at 2:02pm: He certainly could go to Israel, and then be in time for his appointment in the International Court in the Hague to answer for his crimes. lol, in Israel he will be protected, along with all the other war criminals PM's Israel had. Israel...one of the last countries that make hero's out of war criminals. He would receive as much protection their as he would in the US. hehe, yep, another country that has been known to protect war criminals. Where did all those Nazi scientists end up...you know, the ones that experimented on your own people. Paperclip anyone?

Many ended up being invited to dance at a necktie party.
And others who built the V1 & V2 rockets were invited to the US.
Otherwise, the Russians nabbed them.

Abu, what is your take on the recent developments in Libya? Was the west wrong to intervene?

freediver wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 7:20pm:

Abu, what is your take on the recent developments in Libya? Was the west wrong to intervene?

I dont understand the selectiveness in where the west interevenes and where it doesnt.

It allows Saudi firces to enter Bharain and start killing unarmed demonstrators

The US vetoes UN resolutions concerning the Israeli occupation of Palestinine.  

Turns a blind eye at blatant war crimes

When you are inconsistent, you can bet that there are other motives behind the Libyan no fly zones.

And you can enforce a no-fly zone by simply shooting Libyan jets. The USA launches 110 missles from navy ships - how is this enforcing a no-fly zone?

Then they claim that they have the support of the Arab League of Nations - lol (what you mean the gang of fascist dictators that the west has been propping up for decades so that public can be kept in poverty and democracy kept from flourishing whilst the despots line their pockets with oil blood money)

This will get ugly

Quote:

And you can enforce a no-fly zone by simply shooting Libyan jets. The USA launches 110 missles from navy ships - how is this enforcing a no-fly zone?

Shoot them with what?

You need to take out the anti aircraft ground defences. It would be stupid to send aircraft into hostile territory with both enemy aircraft and ground defence shooting back, when you can take the easy option. Also, planes are a lot easier to hit when they are on the ground too.

freediver wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 9:29pm:

Quote: And you can enforce a no-fly zone by simply shooting Libyan jets. The USA launches 110 missles from navy ships - how is this enforcing a no-fly zone? Shoot them with what? You need to take out the anti aircraft ground defences. It would be stupid to send aircraft into hostile territory with both enemy aircraft and ground defence shooting back, when you can take the easy option. Also, planes are a lot easier to hit when they are on the ground too.

and who pays for that course of action?

innocent civilians

One crime does not justify another

Foolosophy,

If you're hoping to engage someone on an intellectual level, then I wouldn't bother with Freediver. His only aim is to play devil's advocate in every discussion he joins, feeling that he's adding some well needed "balance" to each and every discussion.

freediver wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 7:20pm:

Abu, what is your take on the recent developments in Libya? Was the west wrong to intervene?

Dunno what Abu says......but I say we have no place involving ourselves in a civil war.

abu_rashid wrote on Mar 20^th, 2011 at 10:41pm:

Foolosophy, If you're hoping to engage someone on an intellectual level, then I wouldn't bother with Freediver. His only aim is to play devil's advocate in every discussion he joins, feeling that he's adding some well needed "balance" to each and every discussion.

So you are certain that Ghadaffi has Jewish heritage?

What on earth is going on in this world. The current Iranian leader changed his name - is of Jewish extraction,

Both Stalin and Lenin were of Jewish extraction

Even Sarkozy has a Jewish background - and so is the Greek Prime minister Papadreou

what on earth is going on?

I'm not certain of this at all. It's an Israeli magazine which has made this claim, I merely re-posted it.