Marxist socialist-feminists with the support of a UN protocol have a global agenda to control our worlds population out of 'said' environmental concern for a planet ark, this and are winning by means of generating fear, propaganda, intimidation, and a popular consensus that population control is socially achievable by imposing environmental taxes,  when in fact it's a means of ensuring socio-demographic enslavement and control, right down to our very last key-stroke. If population control were achievable by increasing electricity prices..(lowering living standards) wilfully inflicting poverty on a populace, then why is it that our more deprived and impoverished nations on earth are also our more reproductively prolific?

We behave like bacteria, and when faced with the threat of extinction, our biological urge switches on and goes into overdrive. Our baby boomers are a perfect example of this interesting phenomena scientists are only beginning to understand. ...observing how bacteria arrange one another into carefully selected and genetically desirable communities, this and even communicate with one another on a cellular level, not unlike how we do really. Hence our cellular phones!!'
*groan* Ok, bad joke..., but even bacteria and assorted other organisms we are believed to have spawned from by some exhibit some rather humanoid-like behaviours, like population control, murder, discrimination, communication.


It's believed by some we are super-organisms, resilient, invasive, humanoid-bacterial hybrids currently plaguing the earth.



We must be stopped!!! AT ALL COST!!!!

But have we ever stopped to wonder why we privileged are bewildered by starving diseased abdominally bloated stick-people breeding like rabbits in 3rd world countries, celebrating the birth of their 14th child irrespective of high infant mortality rates and obvious poverty?

What do bacteria do when threatened, or faced with the possibility of extinction/invasion?
They multiply rapidly, as a means of survival. ...go into a type of biological overdrive... it's believed some don't however, rather they commit suicide, practice cannibalism, certain strains anyway.

Now for the developed new world order...traditional values, sentiments, families and beliefs simply don't fit the UN vision for their 21st Century community prototype. Breeders will be penalised, this and taxed heavily for their biologically invasive and green-house-gas emitting spawn, while pro-euthanasia and abortion lobby's and activists normalise the lawful practice of subtle genocide.

With or without the imposition of soul and lifestyle destroying taxes or one child policies, you will obey those who dictate the terms of corpocracy, so breeders beware...and have your chequebooks ready to make a tax deductible donation to your already chosen federally funded UN approved GALP approved organisation in the event you have just that one child too many.


Welcome to Sustainable Population Australia Inc.

http://www.population.org.au/

http://www.lifenews.com/int1206.html

http://www.news.com.au/baby-tax-needed-to-save-planet-claims-expert/story-e6frfkp9-1111115071784

This is just another example of the lower members of the human race scamming under the banner of morality.  We need population reduction, all environmental problems can be directly linked to over population.  The answer to this, I believe comes in two main sections, for the developed world we need to alter our financial system so it doesn`t rely on population increase and expansion.  For the poor countries, we have to eliminate poverty, and then alter ingrained breeding practices.

Pipe dream?  I think so.

I agree, population reduction, or at least sustainability is required here without a doubt, but I just don't think inflicting famine on already developing countries will solve the problem.

Especially considering the poorest of the poor are the more reproductive and needy for their woes.


Like adding fuel to the fire.

Lifenews is hardly a feminist organisation. They're a rabid pro-life group.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Sep 20^th, 2010 at 11:58am:

Lifenews is hardly a feminist organisation. They're a rabid pro-life group.

To be accepted as a true feminist you have to be unquestioningly anti-life?

mellie wrote on Sep 20^th, 2010 at 8:12am:

Marxist socialist-feminists with the support of a UN protocol have a global agenda to control our worlds population out of 'said' environmental concern for a planet ark, this and are winning by means of generating fear, propaganda, intimidation, and a popular consensus that population control is socially achievable by imposing environmental taxes,  when in fact it's a means of ensuring socio-demographic enslavement and control, right down to our very last key-stroke. If population control were achievable by increasing electricity prices..(lowering living standards) wilfully inflicting poverty on a populace, then why is it that our more deprived and impoverished nations on earth are also our more reproductively prolific? We behave like bacteria, and when faced with the threat of extinction, our biological urge switches on and goes into overdrive. Our baby boomers are a perfect example of this interesting phenomena scientists are only beginning to understand. ...observing how bacteria arrange one another into carefully selected and genetically desirable communities, this and even communicate with one another on a cellular level, not unlike how we do really. Hence our cellular phones!!' *groan* Ok, bad joke..., but even bacteria and assorted other organisms we are believed to have spawned from by some exhibit some rather humanoid-like behaviours, like population control, murder, discrimination, communication. It's believed by some we are super-organisms, resilient, invasive, humanoid-bacterial hybrids currently plaguing the earth. We must be stopped!!! AT ALL COST!!!! But have we ever stopped to wonder why we privileged are bewildered by starving diseased abdominally bloated stick-people breeding like rabbits in 3rd world countries, celebrating the birth of their 14th child irrespective of high infant mortality rates and obvious poverty? What do bacteria do when threatened, or faced with the possibility of extinction/invasion? They multiply rapidly, as a means of survival. ...go into a type of biological overdrive... it's believed some don't however, rather they commit suicide, practice cannibalism, certain strains anyway. Now for the developed new world order...traditional values, sentiments, families and beliefs simply don't fit the UN vision for their 21st Century community prototype. Breeders will be penalised, this and taxed heavily for their biologically invasive and green-house-gas emitting spawn, while pro-euthanasia and abortion lobby's and activists normalise the lawful practice of subtle genocide. With or without the imposition of soul and lifestyle destroying taxes or one child policies, you will obey those who dictate the terms of corpocracy, so breeders beware...and have your chequebooks ready to make a tax deductible donation to your already chosen federally funded UN approved GALP approved organisation in the event you have just that one child too many. Welcome to Sustainable Population Australia Inc. http://www.population.org.au/ http://www.lifenews.com/int1206.html http://www.news.com.au/baby-tax-needed-to-save-planet-claims-expert/story-e6frfkp9-1111115071784

Well your article missed out on referencing the Illuminati, the New World Order and Zionists.........but did manage to use all the other 'fringe' group buzzwords.......well done...

Quote:

To be accepted as a true feminist you have to be unquestioningly anti-life?

Try really hard not to be ridiculous, Soren.

Interesting. You can't be a feminst and against abortion at the same time.  Defending life is somehow anti-woman.

'Rabid pro-life' - being on the side of life is crazy!! But I bet you are against the death penalty.

Soren wrote on Sep 20^th, 2010 at 2:25pm:

Interesting. You can't be a feminst and against abortion at the same time.  Defending life is somehow anti-woman. 'Rabid pro-life' - being on the side of life is crazy!! But I bet you are against the death penalty.

This opens a can of worms.  It does seem rather odd to oppose the death penalty for convicted criminals, but to feel comfortable with the killing of unborn babies?

Soren, I don't think Annie was really attempting to create a dichotomy between feminism and the pro-life stance in her initial post. You may be reading too much into it. I think she was just saying that Lifenews (or whatever it is) isn't actually a feminist group, rather, it is just a group explictly concerned with a "pro-life" agenda. As far as I know she has reservations about abortion anyway and is actually supportive of the death penalty.

mellie wrote on Sep 20^th, 2010 at 10:53am:

I agree, population reduction, or at least sustainability is required here without a doubt, but I just don't think inflicting famine on already developing countries will solve the problem. Especially considering the poorest of the poor are the more reproductive and needy for their woes. Like adding fuel to the fire.

Totally agree, I meant to say something like that in my blurb, but it slipped my mind.

Mellie, you may not have realised this, but our birth rate, along with that of most western countries, is below replacement level. We need no grand conspiracy to control our population. We are perfectly capable of doing so ourselves. In fact, our government is giving massive handouts to try to achieve the opposite.

Quote:

Soren, I don't think Annie was really attempting to create a dichotomy between feminism and the pro-life stance in her initial post. You may be reading too much into it. I think she was just saying that Lifenews (or whatever it is) isn't actually a feminist group, rather, it is just a group explictly concerned with a "pro-life" agenda. As far as I know she has reservations about abortion anyway and is actually supportive of the death penalty.

Exactly. I've made it quite clear on this forum that I'm pro death penalty and, for the most part, anti-abortion.

who want a bigger population here ?? the housing developers, landlords, the big business people and the politician

Annie Anthrax wrote on Sep 22^nd, 2010 at 9:38am:

Quote: Soren, I don't think Annie was really attempting to create a dichotomy between feminism and the pro-life stance in her initial post. You may be reading too much into it. I think she was just saying that Lifenews (or whatever it is) isn't actually a feminist group, rather, it is just a group explictly concerned with a "pro-life" agenda. As far as I know she has reservations about abortion anyway and is actually supportive of the death penalty. Exactly. I've made it quite clear on this forum that I'm pro death penalty and, for the most part, anti-abortion.

Fine, sorry.

'rabid pro-life' is tin-eared combination (being mad/sick in favour of life?) and juxtaposed against supposeddly 'real' feminsm as its opposite is startling. I didn't take it to be a mere tin-eared mixed metaphor but as the expression of a stance.

Being mad/sick in the way they go about promoting their beliefs.