Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1283144233

Message started by imcrookonit on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:57pm

Title: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by imcrookonit on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:57pm

Motorists to enjoy cheaper petrol


The national average price of petrol fell to a six- month low of 124 cents per litre in the past week and is expected to drop further, an economist says.

The Australian Institute of Petroleum said in its weekly petrol price report the national average declined 0.8 cent per litre to 124 cents.

The metropolitan average fell 0.8 cent to 112.5 cents per litre and the regional average declined 0.7 cent to 126.9 cents per litre.

Commonwealth Securities economist Savanth Sebastian said pump prices were only heading in one direction at present - "down".

"Motorists are likely to enjoy the cheaper fuel for a while yet," Mr Sebastian said, especially if the dollar manages to hold its recent lofty level, above 90 US cents.

"The strength of the Australian dollar over the past few months has been instrumental in keeping domestic pump prices lower."

In Australian dollar terms, the benchmark Singapore unleaded price is holding at an eight-month low, he said.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by imcrookonit on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by WESLEY.PIPES on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:15pm
I've got a better idea - stop driving Giant 7-seat 4WD's to take the video back to the shop, the kid to school, or yourself to work.  Have a look in  Europe where people have learnt to get around the steep petrol prices by driving tiny 'smart' cars or riding bikes and scooters.
Maybe if petrol was twice the price it is now, people might start to reassess what they actually NEED, and the planet would be better for it too.  Everybody wins!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:41pm

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.



And the only thing that CAN be done about it, is something YOU'D object to....

The only possible ways to cut the price of petrol in this country would be either for the Government to 'nationalise' ALL petrol production by taking over ALL the oil wells and oil companies, or by bringing back the old "Prices Surveillance Act 1983"...
Both of which people would scream 'Socialism' about....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by vegitamite on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:49pm


Ah- the Price Surveillance Act 1983... Interesting.
This may be something I need to look into that I have been querying and wondering about !!!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:51pm

Quote:
Both of which people would scream 'Socialism' about....


It might be socialism, but what exactly is the downside?

(apart from the actual act of nationalising the industry in the first place)

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:00pm

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:51pm:

Quote:
Both of which people would scream 'Socialism' about....


It might be socialism, but what exactly is the downside?



There really isn't one....
I don't have a problem with the Government TELLING the petrol companies what price they should or can charge per litre for petrol...

But there's a lot of people here who will complain about the Government 'interferring' in private enterprise....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:03pm

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:49pm:
Ah- the Price Surveillance Act 1983... Interesting.
This may be something I need to look into that I have been querying and wondering about !!!



Back in the 'old days'...when I was a teen....there used to be Government employees who were the ONLY people who could change the price per litre(or gallon) on the pumps at the servos.....and THAT only happened once or maybe twice per month.....rather than 2, 3 or 4 times a week....

Back in those days, the petrol companies, like Mobil, Shell etc....had to apply to the Federal Government for permission to change the petrol price...

In fact, when the original 'Gulf War' started, in 1990 or 1991....the petrol company reps arrived in Canberra at 7am (on the day Saddam invaded Kuwait) requesting permission to increase the price by 5c per litre.....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by WESLEY.PIPES on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:03pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:00pm:

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:51pm:

Quote:
Both of which people would scream 'Socialism' about....


It might be socialism, but what exactly is the downside?



There really isn't one....
I don't have a problem with the Government TELLING the petrol companies what price they should or can charge per litre for petrol...

But there's a lot of people here who will complain about the Government 'interferring' in private enterprise....



But you've got to wonder what leverage a government would have.  Big Oil exec could just say 'fine, no petrol for you' and then the country grinds to a halt....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:04pm

Quote:
But there's a lot of people here who will complain about the Government 'interferring' in private enterprise....


So I've noticed.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by vegitamite on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:12pm
Back in the 'old days'...when I was a teen....there used to be Government employees who were the ONLY people who could change the price per litre(or gallon) on the pumps at the servos.....and THAT only happened once or maybe twice per month.....rather than 2, 3 or 4 times a week....

======================

 did just stop at petrol ?

In the 'old days' when my parents owned a grocery store. I remember a man coming around I think it was every 6 months. To check the books and the profit /pricing margin.

For some reason I remember groceries ( and other consumer goods) had a 33 and a third percent profit margin and you couldnt go above a RRP Recommended retail price .

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:14pm

Quote:
Back in the 'old days'...when I was a teen....there used to be Government employees who were the ONLY people who could change the price per litre(or gallon) on the pumps at the servos.....and THAT only happened once or maybe twice per month.....rather than 2, 3 or 4 times a week....


I don't know when that was, but my parents owned service stations in NSW during the late 60's and 70's and they changed their own pump prices at the direction of company (in their case, Ampol). At random someone would come from the wholesaler to check the prices or someone from the govt would come to check the pump accuracy.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:16pm

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:00pm:

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:51pm:

Quote:
Both of which people would scream 'Socialism' about....


It might be socialism, but what exactly is the downside?



There really isn't one....
I don't have a problem with the Government TELLING the petrol companies what price they should or can charge per litre for petrol...

But there's a lot of people here who will complain about the Government 'interferring' in private enterprise....



But you've got to wonder what leverage a government would have.  Big Oil exec could just say 'fine, no petrol for you' and then the country grinds to a halt....


However wesley...the problem with THAT is....90% of the petrol WE use/buy actualy comes from HERE....Bass Strait and the North West Shelf.....

It's pumped out of Australian wells, sold to Indonesian refineries(for about 0.05c per litre)..procesed in Indonesia, then bought back from the refineries(by the SAME company) at world 'parity' prices...

In a nutshell....Shell Australia sells the oil to Shell Indonesia for less than $5 per barrel, then buys it back from Shell Indonesia at $60-$75 per barrel, for sale in Australia....

The left hand 'gives' it to the right hand...then the left hand buys it back from the right hand, at an obscene markup...

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by vegitamite on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:24pm
I'll post an old dated email I recieved on petrol pricing . Just for interest "\

A call to all politicians: If you are not a traitor to Australia,
then bring in a bill to abolish WORLD PARITY PRICING of oil.

Today [May 28] in parliament Malcolm Turnbull tried to wax lyrical
about the beauties  of competition. He praised the lowering of tariffs
on imported goods,[many of which come from slave-labour countries] and
he said that any business had the right to change prices at any time.

Logically, he should have gone on to condemn the policy which is
bringing hardship to our poor families - the wretched policy
of WORLD PARITY PRICING of oil.

Why should Australians be charged for their own oil at the same price
as in Singapore, or the controlled markets of the Middle East?

So, Malcolm Turnbull, if you are genuine and logical, then bring in
a bill to allow free competition in oil-pricing, and get us out of the
straight-jacket of World Parity Pricing before that treacherous policy
destroys more and more businesses and families.

How can oil company profits rise when they are paying more for oil?

Does a baker derive greater profits when he has to pay more for his flour?
How come the oil companies' profits just keep going up and up, despite the
cost of their raw material -- oil -- going through the roof?

My conclusion is that they are not any different from their favourite
bedmates -- the kosher banksters -- who profiteer from everybody else's
misery.

Have a  look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasoline_usage_and_pricing

Venezuela sells to the motorist at 5c US per litre.

So, this info is also available to Oz radio talk show hosts, but I can't
imagine anyone of them starting the program with guest Mr Rudd or Mr
Turnbull, "The price of unleaded in Venezuela is 5cUS per litre and though
they have 100% self sufficency, we have 80% self sufficiency in liquid
hydrocarbons and natural gas, why then do we pay $1.50 per litre? Would
10c be a fairer price ?".

To verify that Australia is 80% self-sufficient go to
http://www.csiro.au/science/ps115.html

Also, some material published by government sources says we are 85%
self-sufficient in fuels.

What's especially amazing is that natural gas, as well as coal, can be
converted into liquid hydrocarbon fuel for vehicles.

The media clowns prattle on about whether GST should be removed from the
price per litre as it is a tax on a tax and would shave 3c off, and now,
it seems Mr Rudd is not in good odour for renegging on this tiny amount
which they had earlier mooted favourably.

No broadcaster has ever said anything worthwhile, so far as I know. Were
s/he to, it would be the last cushy job s/he would ever hold, seems to me.

How about "Caracas' price at the pumps!" as a slogan for a independent
candidate at a by-election?  But he might then meet with an accident.

It is has been reported that the cost for producing/winning/pumping a
barrel of Bass Strait crude oil is in the vicinity of $5 or $6.
And we (Oz) produce 80% of domestic needs.
Therefore, may I ask, WHO receives the difference between the $6 and the
$130+ (current price for a BBL of crude)

Does anyone know?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by WESLEY.PIPES on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:25pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:16pm:

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:00pm:

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:51pm:

Quote:
Both of which people would scream 'Socialism' about....


It might be socialism, but what exactly is the downside?



There really isn't one....
I don't have a problem with the Government TELLING the petrol companies what price they should or can charge per litre for petrol...

But there's a lot of people here who will complain about the Government 'interferring' in private enterprise....



But you've got to wonder what leverage a government would have.  Big Oil exec could just say 'fine, no petrol for you' and then the country grinds to a halt....


However wesley...the problem with THAT is....90% of the petrol WE use/buy actualy comes from HERE....Bass Strait and the North West Shelf.....

It's pumped out of Australian wells, sold to Indonesian refineries(for about 0.05c per litre)..procesed in Indonesia, then bought back from the refineries(by the SAME company) at world 'parity' prices...

In a nutshell....Shell Australia sells the oil to Shell Indonesia for less than $5 per barrel, then buys it back from Shell Indonesia at $60-$75 per barrel, for sale in Australia....

The left hand 'gives' it to the right hand...then the left hand buys it back from the right hand, at an obscene markup...




Does australia have the ability to  turn crude oil into the petrol you find at the pumps?  I don't know, but if australias track record on 'value adding' is anything to go by, we still NEED them to turn our oil into pterol, thus they can dictate the terms.  

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:29pm

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.


Well, there would be a way to do it, by getting rid of the Fuel Tax!

However, given that taxes are very likely to increase overall, I see little chance of either Labor or Liberal forgoing some $15-20 Billion in Fuel Tax!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by qikvtec on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:33pm
Port of Brisbane still has oil refineries (as does Melbourne IIRC)

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:34pm

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:25pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:16pm:

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:03pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:00pm:

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 3:51pm:

Quote:
Both of which people would scream 'Socialism' about....


It might be socialism, but what exactly is the downside?



There really isn't one....
I don't have a problem with the Government TELLING the petrol companies what price they should or can charge per litre for petrol...

But there's a lot of people here who will complain about the Government 'interferring' in private enterprise....



But you've got to wonder what leverage a government would have.  Big Oil exec could just say 'fine, no petrol for you' and then the country grinds to a halt....


However wesley...the problem with THAT is....90% of the petrol WE use/buy actualy comes from HERE....Bass Strait and the North West Shelf.....

It's pumped out of Australian wells, sold to Indonesian refineries(for about 0.05c per litre)..procesed in Indonesia, then bought back from the refineries(by the SAME company) at world 'parity' prices...

In a nutshell....Shell Australia sells the oil to Shell Indonesia for less than $5 per barrel, then buys it back from Shell Indonesia at $60-$75 per barrel, for sale in Australia....

The left hand 'gives' it to the right hand...then the left hand buys it back from the right hand, at an obscene markup...




Does australia have the ability to  turn crude oil into the petrol you find at the pumps?  I don't know, but if australias track record on 'value adding' is anything to go by, we still NEED them to turn our oil into pterol, thus they can dictate the terms.  


YES we do wesley...Australia just about 'floats' on light crude oil...the ONLY thing we can't produce, and have to import is in fact 'engine oil'...Our crude oil will even run a deisel oil engine, without processing...

We import the oil that is used to make 'sump oil' for lubrication....everythig else, we produce HERE...

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:36pm

qikvtec wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:33pm:
Port of Brisbane still has oil refineries (as does Melbourne IIRC)



Yes, but 25 years ago, EVERY major city had a refinery....now, most of our oil is sent overseas for refining...

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by WESLEY.PIPES on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:39pm
Well then, I'm convinced....let's nationalise oil and gas and kick the barons to the kerb.  

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by longweekend58 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:44pm

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.


You could always get a job. Its amazing how much cheaper things appear to be when you earn a living instead of bludging off welfare.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:47pm
You can't compare petrol prices in Venezuala to those we pay here in Australia.

The oil industry in Venezuala is nationalised and what they use domestically is a fraction of what they export.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:50pm

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:39pm:
Well then, I'm convinced....let's nationalise oil and gas and kick the barons to the kerb.  




LOL wouldn't it be nice.....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Imperium on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:52pm
How much crude oil do we have in our reserves?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:53pm

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:47pm:
You can't compare petrol prices in Venezuala to those we pay here in Australia.

The oil industry in Venezuala is nationalised and what they use domestically is a fraction of what they export.



I don't compare the price here with Venezuala...they DID nationalise the industry.....however, Venezuala does have the cheapest price per litre at the pump....and they export at the World Parity Price....

Much the same as the price of beef...

Venezuala ONLY exports their excess petrol and beef....which probably isn't a 'bad' thing...

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:56pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:50pm:

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:39pm:
Well then, I'm convinced....let's nationalise oil and gas and kick the barons to the kerb.  




LOL wouldn't it be nice.....


While we're at it, how about we get decent quality petrol as well - and not the rubbish that is usually reserved for third world countries?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:56pm

aikmann4 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:52pm:
How much crude oil do we have in our reserves?



No idea....of course the 'reserves' info does come from the petrol companies...


Back in the 70's we had twice the reserves that Arabia did....so it's a little difficult to work out...

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:57pm

Quote:
I don't compare the price here with Venezuala...


I think it was Vege who posted the email about the price in Venezuala vs here.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 5:16pm

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:57pm:

Quote:
I don't compare the price here with Venezuala...


I think it was Vege who posted the email about the price in VenezuaVenezuala la vs here.



True, but Venezuala  DOES have nationalised  petrol production....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by life_goes_on on Aug 30th, 2010 at 5:31pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 5:16pm:

Life_goes_on wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:57pm:

Quote:
I don't compare the price here with Venezuala...


I think it was Vege who posted the email about the price in VenezuaVenezuala la vs here.



True, but Venezuala  DOES have nationalised  petrol production....


I know. That was part of my argument against it being a valid comparison.


Quote:
The oil industry in Venezuala is nationalised and what they use domestically is a fraction of what they export.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:15pm

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.



So you're talking about a couple of cents per litre?

In total if you fill up once per week, an extra few dollars per week.

Say even at $15 extra per week.

$15!!!!

A latte is $4.50. You'd spend the best part of $20-$30 in the first hour on a friday after work.

Bit of perspective.
People who complain about $20 per week need a dose of reality or are a bunch of tightarses.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by WESLEY.PIPES on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:20pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:15pm:

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.



So you're talking about a couple of cents per litre?

In total if you fill up once per week, an extra few dollars per week.

Say even at $15 extra per week.

$15!!!!

A latte is $4.50. You'd spend the best part of $20-$30 in the first hour on a friday after work.

Bit of perspective.
People who complain about $20 per week need a dose of reality or are a bunch of tightarses.




Maybe they wouldn't complain if they were on over 150K per year....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:22pm

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:20pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:15pm:

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.



So you're talking about a couple of cents per litre?

In total if you fill up once per week, an extra few dollars per week.

Say even at $15 extra per week.

$15!!!!

A latte is $4.50. You'd spend the best part of $20-$30 in the first hour on a friday after work.

Bit of perspective.
People who complain about $20 per week need a dose of reality or are a bunch of tightarses.




Maybe they wouldn't complain if they were on over 150K per year....



Bollox.
Tightarses complain no matter what they are on.

People need a fking reality check.
You spend more on a latte than you do on three litres of petrol!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by WESLEY.PIPES on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:26pm

Quote:
Bollox.
Tightarses complain no matter what they are on.

People need a fking reality check.
You spend more on a latte than you do on three litres of petrol!



True.....maybe they wouldn't complain AS MUCH?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:42pm

aikmann4 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:52pm:
How much crude oil do we have in our reserves?




The above confirms that AUSTRALIA IS PAST PEAK RESERVES & PRODUCTION, which means we will become more and more reliant on imported oil and that reliance will quicken dramatically, if both liberal & Labor proceed with their plans for a dramatically larger Australian Population!

The above chart is off the following link -
http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.theoildrum.com/uploads/12/rp_australia.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/4/26/18109/8251&h=476&w=692&sz=120&tbnid=1CIsvjRrjwZC8M:&tbnh=96&tbnw=139&prev=/images%3Fq%3DAustralian%2BOil%2BReserves&zoom=1&hl=en&usg=__nj-eJI7PmJJYGb7xy6XAOWZDaV8=&sa=X&ei=uWx7TPeeB4WDnQf4kZGdCw&ved=0CDAQ9QEwBw

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:44pm
Perceptions, You and I disagree hugely on your 'end of days' predictions for the oil reserves of the world.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:45pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:22pm:

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:20pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:15pm:

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.



So you're talking about a couple of cents per litre?

In total if you fill up once per week, an extra few dollars per week.

Say even at $15 extra per week.

$15!!!!

A latte is $4.50. You'd spend the best part of $20-$30 in the first hour on a friday after work.

Bit of perspective.
People who complain about $20 per week need a dose of reality or are a bunch of tightarses.




Maybe they wouldn't complain if they were on over 150K per year....



Bollox.
Tightarses complain no matter what they are on.

People need a fking reality check.
You spend more on a latte than you do on three litres of petrol!

Andrei,
You are still "ME centric"!

The problem is that People & the Economy, are not a level playing field!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:49pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:44pm:
Perceptions, You and I disagree hugely on your 'end of days' predictions for the oil reserves of the world.


Yes, I think we came to that conclusion some time ago!

But, I will continue to raise the issues, as information comes forward, so that you may eventually see the error of your ways?

Btw, you seem to be a frequent visitor to the site, are you now back in Australia?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:49pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:45pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:22pm:

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:20pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:15pm:

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.



So you're talking about a couple of cents per litre?

In total if you fill up once per week, an extra few dollars per week.

Say even at $15 extra per week.

$15!!!!

A latte is $4.50. You'd spend the best part of $20-$30 in the first hour on a friday after work.

Bit of perspective.
People who complain about $20 per week need a dose of reality or are a bunch of tightarses.




Maybe they wouldn't complain if they were on over 150K per year....



Bollox.
Tightarses complain no matter what they are on.

People need a fking reality check.
You spend more on a latte than you do on three litres of petrol!

Andrei,
You are still "ME centric"!

The problem is that People & the Economy, are not a level playing field!


In what way is it not a level playing field?

People who worked hard at school, have qualifications and recognised to fit their skills to a skills gap have higher disposable income to spend on petrol.
Those people who did not try, did obtain the skillset required are not rewarded.

The playing field IS even, it is more a case of whether people want to actually to bother chasing the ball.

The field is even. The people's care factor is not.

Works for me. I have little time for people who couldn't be fked.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:51pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:49pm:
Btw, you seem to be a frequent visitor to the site, are you now back in Australia?



Yes, til Thursday.
A holiday for the wife and little one, a work trip for me.
Planned over 6 months ago and pure accident that old bogan woman called the election for the same period.
Well made no difference to me given I don't vote this time but made it an interesting trip.

Have you sorted out your planned trip to Europe?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 7:03pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:51pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:49pm:
Btw, you seem to be a frequent visitor to the site, are you now back in Australia?



Yes, til Thursday.
A holiday for the wife and little one, a work trip for me.
Planned over 6 months ago and pure accident that old bogan woman called the election for the same period.
Well made no difference to me given I don't vote this time but made it an interesting trip.

Have you sorted out your planned trip to Europe?


No, still in the early stages of planning, but I appreciated your advice!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 7:11pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:49pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:45pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:22pm:

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:20pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:15pm:

wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 2:59pm:
Yes I know petrol is to expensive, and you are right.  Something should be done about it.   I'm crook on it.



So you're talking about a couple of cents per litre?

In total if you fill up once per week, an extra few dollars per week.

Say even at $15 extra per week.

$15!!!!

A latte is $4.50. You'd spend the best part of $20-$30 in the first hour on a friday after work.

Bit of perspective.
People who complain about $20 per week need a dose of reality or are a bunch of tightarses.




Maybe they wouldn't complain if they were on over 150K per year....



Bollox.
Tightarses complain no matter what they are on.

People need a fking reality check.
You spend more on a latte than you do on three litres of petrol!

Andrei,
You are still "ME centric"!

The problem is that People & the Economy, are not a level playing field!


In what way is it not a level playing field?

People who worked hard at school, have qualifications and recognised to fit their skills to a skills gap have higher disposable income to spend on petrol.
Those people who did not try, did obtain the skillset required are not rewarded.

The playing field IS even, it is more a case of whether people want to actually to bother chasing the ball.

The field is even. The people's care factor is not.

Works for me. I have little time for people who couldn't be fked.


No matter what schooling, qualifications etc, not everyone is going to be able to be a President, a Prime Minister, A Director or even weel paid or paid at all, they are simple facts of life.l
Yes, some will, but simple arithmetic will show that there are a small number of chiefs & a large number of indians, so some will be better off, whilst many will be not so well of, no matter what.

So, no ,it is not a level playing field, never has been & never will be!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Enforcer on Aug 30th, 2010 at 7:12pm

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:25pm:
[quote author=gizmo_2655 link=1283144233/0#12 date=1283148985][quote author=WESLEY.PIPES link=1283144233/0#8 date=1283148230][quote author=gizmo_2655 link=1283144233/0#6 date=1283148019][quote author=life_goes_on link=1283144233/0#5 date=1283147471]



Does australia have the ability to  turn crude oil into the petrol you find at the pumps?  I don't know, but if australias track record on 'value adding' is anything to go by, we still NEED them to turn our oil into pterol, thus they can dictate the terms.  


There called refineries and we have 5 of them  ;)

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 7:19pm

Enforcer wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 7:12pm:

... wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:25pm:
[quote author=gizmo_2655 link=1283144233/0#12 date=1283148985][quote author=WESLEY.PIPES link=1283144233/0#8 date=1283148230][quote author=gizmo_2655 link=1283144233/0#6 date=1283148019][quote author=life_goes_on link=1283144233/0#5 date=1283147471]



Does australia have the ability to  turn crude oil into the petrol you find at the pumps?  I don't know, but if australias track record on 'value adding' is anything to go by, we still NEED them to turn our oil into pterol, thus they can dictate the terms.  


There called refineries and we have 5 of them  ;)


I would suggest that there is a reason that the USA haven't built another Oil refinery since about 1970 & it's a very good reason, from a long term economic perspective.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 8:37pm
PN there are still considerable resources of oil in newer places.

Offshore deep-sea drilling and the advances made in technology are bringing these to reality.

The last bell is some way from chiming yet.

As regards peak oil, you and I both know that is also likely we are still a way from reaching the peak point.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:01pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 8:37pm:
PN there are still considerable resources of oil in newer places.
Offshore deep-sea drilling and the advances made in technology are bringing these to reality.

The last bell is some way from chiming yet.

As regards peak oil, you and I both know that is also likely we are still a way from reaching the peak point.

I agree, there are still new resources that will come on-stream, but they will not be sufficient to offset the Decline in existing fields, particularly as the older & larger fields like Ghawar go into decline, which is either already happening or very close to it.

We effectively reached Peak Oil 5 years ago!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:07pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:01pm:
We effectively reached Peak Oil 5 years ago!
[/b]



really PN?
Now I know you understand the concept of Peak Oil as well as I do.

And therefore you would KNOW that you cannot state that we have reached peak oil because it is identified by a trend analysis of a period of decades.

Therefore your statement that we have reached it is both guesswork and completely unfounded. Correct?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:07pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:42pm:

aikmann4 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:52pm:
How much crude oil do we have in our reserves?




The above confirms that AUSTRALIA IS PAST PEAK RESERVES & PRODUCTION, which means we will become more and more reliant on imported oil and that reliance will quicken dramatically, if both liberal & Labor proceed with their plans for a dramatically larger Australian Population!

The above chart is off the following link -
http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.theoildrum.com/uploads/12/rp_australia.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/4/26/18109/8251&h=476&w=692&sz=120&tbnid=1CIsvjRrjwZC8M:&tbnh=96&tbnw=139&prev=/images%3Fq%3DAustralian%2BOil%2BReserves&zoom=1&hl=en&usg=__nj-eJI7PmJJYGb7xy6XAOWZDaV8=&sa=X&ei=uWx7TPeeB4WDnQf4kZGdCw&ved=0CDAQ9QEwBw



Perceptions...for most of the decade of the 1970s..BP, Shell and Esso were finding and capping a well per week....at minimum..that was 520 'capped' wells in Bass Strait and on the North West Shelf (or possible 1560 wells, if each company was finding a well per week)....
So at very least there are probably still around 400 capped wells that haven't been used YET...

So are we really at our 'peak production' yet????

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:11pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:07pm:
So are we really at our 'peak production' yet????



He has no idea.
Neither do I.
Neither does anyone.

Peak production is identified in data spanning over 30-40 years.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:14pm
Also Perceptions - the technology brought online in the last decade is enabling the oil companies and their contractors to drill at ever deeper depths on the ocean floor which was unheard of only 2 decades back.

Exploration is now fundamentally different, we can scan the ocean floor from the surface and identify key drilling points to test for oil.
Again unheard of in the 1990s even.

You can't apply simply 'this has been the case since 1970' logic because the technology and ability to drill has completely changed and is continuing to change!

We can drill much further, much safer and without excessive cost.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:15pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:07pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:01pm:
We effectively reached Peak Oil 5 years ago!
[/b]



really PN?
Now I know you understand the concept of Peak Oil as well as I do.

And therefore you would KNOW that you cannot state that we have reached peak oil because it is identified by a trend analysis of a period of decades.

Therefore your statement that we have reached it is both guesswork and completely unfounded. Correct?


We both know that Production has not show any growth for 5 years, despite 2 years of that being prior to the GFC, a massive rise in the Price of Oil and continued Population growth.

If growth was possible, it would have happened already, the confirmation will come later!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:19pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:15pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:07pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:01pm:
We effectively reached Peak Oil 5 years ago!
[/b]



really PN?
Now I know you understand the concept of Peak Oil as well as I do.

And therefore you would KNOW that you cannot state that we have reached peak oil because it is identified by a trend analysis of a period of decades.

Therefore your statement that we have reached it is both guesswork and completely unfounded. Correct?


We both know that Production has not show any growth for 5 years, despite 2 years of that being prior to the GFC, a massive rise in the Price of Oil and continued Population growth.

If growth was possible, it would have happened already, the confirmation will come later!


So basically if I can sum up -

You're taking data for 5 years, which is 1/6th of the recommended data timeframe for assessing peak oil trends.

You're also using this timeframe of 5 years to extrapolate that into the future there will be no further growth.

That is a huge call and akin to what I am doing now at work. Basically pulling together my 2014 forecast based on the last 2 years. I know I am going to be out by millions compared to my 2011 forecast because the number of unknowns is higher.

You're doing the same, plus you're selecting a very short period of time for a trend analysis.

Guesswork. You have as much chance of being wrong as right.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Yahoon on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:20pm
The major factor in slowing production is from the left who have hamstrung growth under the guise of environmentalism by locking up vast areas

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:21pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:14pm:
Also Perceptions - the technology brought online in the last decade is enabling the oil companies and their contractors to drill at ever deeper depths on the ocean floor which was unheard of only 2 decades back.

Exploration is now fundamentally different, we can scan the ocean floor from the surface and identify key drilling points to test for oil.
Again unheard of in the 1990s even.

You can't apply simply 'this has been the case since 1970' logic because the technology and ability to drill has completely changed and is continuing to change!

We can drill much further, much safer and without excessive cost.


That is just plain -
Credible
R eliable
A bundant
P aradoxes

1) Remember BP & the Gulf of Mexico.
2) The EROEI on the likes of these Deep water wells & the Canada Tar Sands is extremely low compared to the old fields.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Yahoon on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:25pm

Quote:
2) The EROEI on the likes of these Deep water wells & the Canada Tar Sands is extremely low compared to the old fields.


Fortunately for humanity, it is still a crapload better than the EROEI on solar panels and wind farms

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:27pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:21pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:14pm:
Also Perceptions - the technology brought online in the last decade is enabling the oil companies and their contractors to drill at ever deeper depths on the ocean floor which was unheard of only 2 decades back.

Exploration is now fundamentally different, we can scan the ocean floor from the surface and identify key drilling points to test for oil.
Again unheard of in the 1990s even.

You can't apply simply 'this has been the case since 1970' logic because the technology and ability to drill has completely changed and is continuing to change!

We can drill much further, much safer and without excessive cost.


That is just plain -
Credible
R eliable
A bundant
P aradoxes

1) Remember BP & the Gulf of Mexico.
2) The EROEI on the likes of these Deep water wells & the Canada Tar Sands is extremely low compared to the old fields.



The BP incident was a one-off accident. If you view that in isolation it was bad.
If you view it in the amount of oil that is being drilled for all over the world and in depths never before seen, you will see it for what it was.

PS - The scale of the disaster was greatly over-exaggerated to suit US domestic politics.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:29pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:07pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 6:42pm:

aikmann4 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 4:52pm:
How much crude oil do we have in our reserves?




The above confirms that AUSTRALIA IS PAST PEAK RESERVES & PRODUCTION, which means we will become more and more reliant on imported oil and that reliance will quicken dramatically, if both liberal & Labor proceed with their plans for a dramatically larger Australian Population!

The above chart is off the following link -
http://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.theoildrum.com/uploads/12/rp_australia.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/4/26/18109/8251&h=476&w=692&sz=120&tbnid=1CIsvjRrjwZC8M:&tbnh=96&tbnw=139&prev=/images%3Fq%3DAustralian%2BOil%2BReserves&zoom=1&hl=en&usg=__nj-eJI7PmJJYGb7xy6XAOWZDaV8=&sa=X&ei=uWx7TPeeB4WDnQf4kZGdCw&ved=0CDAQ9QEwBw



Perceptions...for most of the decade of the 1970s..BP, Shell and Esso were finding and capping a well per week....at minimum..that was 520 'capped' wells in Bass Strait and on the North West Shelf (or possible 1560 wells, if each company was finding a well per week)....
So at very least there are probably still around 400 capped wells that haven't been used YET...

So are we really at our 'peak production' yet????


You are talking about different things!

BP & the 70's was about Peak discovery & the Global Peak for new Oil discoveries was about 1965.

The Peak of Production is about how much is being pumped out of the fields and that effectively Peaked in 2005, notwithstanding a whole bundle of reasons why production shouldn't have continued to rise, IF it possibly could!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:30pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:15pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:07pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:01pm:
We effectively reached Peak Oil 5 years ago!
[/b]



really PN?
Now I know you understand the concept of Peak Oil as well as I do.

And therefore you would KNOW that you cannot state that we have reached peak oil because it is identified by a trend analysis of a period of decades.

Therefore your statement that we have reached it is both guesswork and completely unfounded. Correct?


We both know that Production has not show any growth for 5 years, despite 2 years of that being prior to the GFC, a massive rise in the Price of Oil and continued Population growth.

If growth was possible, it would have happened already, the confirmation will come later!


Perceptions....the 'massive rise' in the price of oil is due to GREED, not a decline in supply.....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:34pm
The crisis of high price of oil was not actually caused by a lowering of supply vs demand rather the speculation on Wall St.

Oil is probably the one area which is unique in that respect.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:37pm

Yahoon wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:25pm:

Quote:
2) The EROEI on the likes of these Deep water wells & the Canada Tar Sands is extremely low compared to the old fields.


Fortunately for humanity, it is still a crapload better than the EROEI on solar panels and wind farms


Unfortunately, that is not correct, both Wind & Solar are preferable to Tar Sands & the Deep water fields, which are in between the Tar Sands & US Crude, are also not flash.


Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Equitist on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:43pm


gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:30pm:
Perceptions....the 'massive rise' in the price of oil is due to GREED, not a decline in supply.....


If anything, the price of oil has probably been too low - given that it is a finite resource...

If humanity survives another 200 years, I expect that our descendants will marvel over the arrogant and reckless stupidity of the consumerist humans who lived 'in the moment' in the century between about 1930 and 2030...

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:48pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:34pm:
The crisis of high price of oil was not actually caused by a lowering of supply vs demand rather the speculation on Wall St.

Oil is probably the one area which is unique in that respect.


I agree that Oil is unique, because it has enabled so much of the increased Productivity over the last 100 years or so and a large part of the Global Economy is dependent on Oil.

I also agree there was no doubt some speculation in the price increase, but the basis of the increase was driven by speculation on whether Oil Production had Peaked.

It had Peaked & that was the major reason for the Price increase and a large part of the reason for the ensuing GFC, which subsequently resulted in a slowing Global Economy anf falling Oil Demand, which has brought oil Prices to a lower level of stability at present.

As the GFC resunes, I expect Demand will fall further, which will mask the fact that Production is slowing and as Demand slows, the pressure will resume for a lower, not higher price, FOR THE TIME BEING!  

Of course the wild card in this is the US$, which may de-value causing a spike in the Oil Price?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:54pm

Equitist wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:43pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:30pm:
Perceptions....the 'massive rise' in the price of oil is due to GREED, not a decline in supply.....


If anything, the price of oil has probably been too low - given that it is a finite resource...

If humanity survives another 200 years, I expect that our descendants will marvel over the arrogant and reckless stupidity of the consumerist humans who lived 'in the moment' in the century between about 1930 and 2030...



No, it's not due to 'limited' amounts...
For example, in 1980 Saudia Arabia's estimated reserves of oil was 168 billion barrels.....in 2008 Saudi Arabia's reserve was 264 billion barrels....

If we reached 'peak production' in 1990, why have the reserves gone UP????

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:55pm
GFC resumes??

You aren't one of those crackpots predicting a double-dip recession are you?

In North America, we have been predicting and seeing a consistent increase in economic growth and also we're likely to see steady positive growth through at least the next 8 quarters.

Europe is seeing some volatility and slowdown in its growth but that is principally caused by the increase of the capital debt taken on to rescue Greece and Portugal which was a domestic structure issue.

The UK is undergoing some different issues.

On the whole though, the regulation has been tightened up on sub-prime lending, the banks have tightened up their exposture to multi-facet investment vehicles and there is a greater responsibility in capital lending.

I am confident we'll continue to see growth continue in North America.
Times are not bad, things on the whole are pretty good for a lot of us you know.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Equitist on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:05pm



Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:55pm:
GFC resumes??

You aren't one of those crackpots predicting a double-dip recession are you?

In North America, we have been predicting and seeing a consistent increase in economic growth and also we're likely to see steady positive growth through at least the next 8 quarters.

Europe is seeing some volatility and slowdown in its growth but that is principally caused by the increase of the capital debt taken on to rescue Greece and Portugal which was a domestic structure issue.

The UK is undergoing some different issues.

On the whole though, the regulation has been tightened up on sub-prime lending, the banks have tightened up their exposture to multi-facet investment vehicles and there is a greater responsibility in capital lending.

I am confident we'll continue to see growth continue in North America.
Times are not bad, things on the whole are pretty good for a lot of us you know.


FFS, Android, your ignorance is only surpassed by your arrogance and elitism!

Meantime, I've just saved your post for posterity...


Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by freediver on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:07pm
I think the price should go up.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:11pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:54pm:

Equitist wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:43pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:30pm:
Perceptions....the 'massive rise' in the price of oil is due to GREED, not a decline in supply.....


If anything, the price of oil has probably been too low - given that it is a finite resource...

If humanity survives another 200 years, I expect that our descendants will marvel over the arrogant and reckless stupidity of the consumerist humans who lived 'in the moment' in the century between about 1930 and 2030...



No, it's not due to 'limited' amounts...
For example, in 1980 Saudia Arabia's estimated reserves of oil was 168 billion barrels.....in 2008 Saudi Arabia's reserve was 264 billion barrels....

If we reached 'peak production' in 1990, why have the reserves gone UP????


Because all of the OPEC nations had a fuss in the mid 80's about Production and who would produce how much.

There's no 2nd guess required here, I'm sure there are many who will guess the outcome.

Virtually overnight almost all the OPEC nations massively raised their reserves, without any basis and they have never been lowered since, despite the huge levels of Production in between then & now!  

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:15pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:55pm:
GFC resumes??

You aren't one of those crackpots predicting a double-dip recession are you?

In North America, we have been predicting and seeing a consistent increase in economic growth and also we're likely to see steady positive growth through at least the next 8 quarters.

Europe is seeing some volatility and slowdown in its growth but that is principally caused by the increase of the capital debt taken on to rescue Greece and Portugal which was a domestic structure issue.

The UK is undergoing some different issues.

On the whole though, the regulation has been tightened up on sub-prime lending, the banks have tightened up their exposture to multi-facet investment vehicles and there is a greater responsibility in capital lending.

I am confident we'll continue to see growth continue in North America.
Times are not bad, things on the whole are pretty good for a lot of us you know.


I hope you haven't been out buying up heaps of shares, on the back of your confident expectations?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:18pm

freediver wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:07pm:
I think the price should go up.


Are you talking about the Price at the bowser OR the international Price per Barrel?

Do you think it should go up or will go up & why?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:19pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:11pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:54pm:

Equitist wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:43pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:30pm:
Perceptions....the 'massive rise' in the price of oil is due to GREED, not a decline in supply.....


If anything, the price of oil has probably been too low - given that it is a finite resource...

If humanity survives another 200 years, I expect that our descendants will marvel over the arrogant and reckless stupidity of the consumerist humans who lived 'in the moment' in the century between about 1930 and 2030...



No, it's not due to 'limited' amounts...
For example, in 1980 Saudia Arabia's estimated reserves of oil was 168 billion barrels.....in 2008 Saudi Arabia's reserve was 264 billion barrels....

If we reached 'peak production' in 1990, why have the reserves gone UP????


Because all of the OPEC nations had a fuss in the mid 80's about Production and who would produce how much.

There's no 2nd guess required here, I'm sure there are many who will guess the outcome.

Virtually overnight almost all the OPEC nations massively raised their reserves, without any basis and they have never been lowered since, despite the huge levels of Production in between then & now!  



And doesn't that tell you that the OPEC countries are NOT running out of oil??
And since the OPEC countries have REDUCED their production many times since the 80's instead of increasing it.....That means that the OPEC countries, at least, haven't hit 'Peak Production' levels yet....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:28pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:55pm:
GFC resumes??

You aren't one of those crackpots predicting a double-dip recession are you?

In North America, we have been predicting and seeing a consistent increase in economic growth and also we're likely to see steady positive growth through at least the next 8 quarters.

Europe is seeing some volatility and slowdown in its growth but that is principally caused by the increase of the capital debt taken on to rescue Greece and Portugal which was a domestic structure issue.

The UK is undergoing some different issues.

On the whole though, the regulation has been tightened up on sub-prime lending, the banks have tightened up their exposture to multi-facet investment vehicles and there is a greater responsibility in capital lending.

I am confident we'll continue to see growth continue in North America.
Times are not bad, things on the whole are pretty good for a lot of us you know.


Andrei,
You probably won't take any notice, But -

Robert Shiller: Double-Dip May Be ‘Imminent’

In this week’s Big Interview, the Journal’s Simon Constable interviews Robert Shiller, Professor of Economics at Yale University, who says that an economic double dip may be “imminent.”

“Double dips are rare historically, but this is the kind of environment that makes me worried,” Shiller said.

In this 20 minutes long interview, Mr. Shiller also talks about the sharp falloff in home sales and what the Fed should do to stimulate the slowing U.S. economy.

20 minute interview with Robert Schiller follows, on link.

Link -
http://wallstreetpit.com/42516-robert-shiller-double-dip-may-be-imminent

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:30pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:11pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:54pm:

Equitist wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:43pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:30pm:
Perceptions....the 'massive rise' in the price of oil is due to GREED, not a decline in supply.....


If anything, the price of oil has probably been too low - given that it is a finite resource...

If humanity survives another 200 years, I expect that our descendants will marvel over the arrogant and reckless stupidity of the consumerist humans who lived 'in the moment' in the century between about 1930 and 2030...



No, it's not due to 'limited' amounts...
For example, in 1980 Saudia Arabia's estimated reserves of oil was 168 billion barrels.....in 2008 Saudi Arabia's reserve was 264 billion barrels....

If we reached 'peak production' in 1990, why have the reserves gone UP????


Because all of the OPEC nations had a fuss in the mid 80's about Production and who would produce how much.

There's no 2nd guess required here, I'm sure there are many who will guess the outcome.

Virtually overnight almost all the OPEC nations massively raised their reserves, without any basis and they have never been lowered since, despite the huge levels of Production in between then & now!  



And doesn't that tell you that the OPEC countries are NOT running out of oil??
And since the OPEC countries have REDUCED their production many times since the 80's instead of increasing it.....That means that the OPEC countries, at least, haven't hit 'Peak Production' levels yet
....


You are kidding, aren't you, Gizmo???

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 31st, 2010 at 7:46am

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:30pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:11pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:54pm:

Equitist wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:43pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:30pm:
Perceptions....the 'massive rise' in the price of oil is due to GREED, not a decline in supply.....


If anything, the price of oil has probably been too low - given that it is a finite resource...

If humanity survives another 200 years, I expect that our descendants will marvel over the arrogant and reckless stupidity of the consumerist humans who lived 'in the moment' in the century between about 1930 and 2030...



No, it's not due to 'limited' amounts...
For example, in 1980 Saudia Arabia's estimated reserves of oil was 168 billion barrels.....in 2008 Saudi Arabia's reserve was 264 billion barrels....

If we reached 'peak production' in 1990, why have the reserves gone UP????


Because all of the OPEC nations had a fuss in the mid 80's about Production and who would produce how much.

There's no 2nd guess required here, I'm sure there are many who will guess the outcome.

Virtually overnight almost all the OPEC nations massively raised their reserves, without any basis and they have never been lowered since, despite the huge levels of Production in between then & now!  



And doesn't that tell you that the OPEC countries are NOT running out of oil??
And since the OPEC countries have REDUCED their production many times since the 80's instead of increasing it.....That means that the OPEC countries, at least, haven't hit 'Peak Production' levels yet
....


You are kidding, aren't you, Gizmo???



No, I am quite serious...

Peak Oil means, basically that the oil producers (whether companies or countries) are producing as much oil as they possible can..Right?

But the OPEC countries are NOT...they have reduced their 'barrels per day' production at least 5 times in the last decade....which means, IF they wanted to they could increase far more oil, on a daily basis, than they are currently doing.

So OPEC is NOT at 'Peak' production levels....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 12:03pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 7:46am:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:30pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:19pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 10:11pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:54pm:

Equitist wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:43pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 30th, 2010 at 9:30pm:
Perceptions....the 'massive rise' in the price of oil is due to GREED, not a decline in supply.....


If anything, the price of oil has probably been too low - given that it is a finite resource...

If humanity survives another 200 years, I expect that our descendants will marvel over the arrogant and reckless stupidity of the consumerist humans who lived 'in the moment' in the century between about 1930 and 2030...



No, it's not due to 'limited' amounts...
For example, in 1980 Saudia Arabia's estimated reserves of oil was 168 billion barrels.....in 2008 Saudi Arabia's reserve was 264 billion barrels....

If we reached 'peak production' in 1990, why have the reserves gone UP????


Because all of the OPEC nations had a fuss in the mid 80's about Production and who would produce how much.

There's no 2nd guess required here, I'm sure there are many who will guess the outcome.

Virtually overnight almost all the OPEC nations massively raised their reserves, without any basis and they have never been lowered since, despite the huge levels of Production in between then & now!  



And doesn't that tell you that the OPEC countries are NOT running out of oil??
And since the OPEC countries have REDUCED their production many times since the 80's instead of increasing it.....That means that the OPEC countries, at least, haven't hit 'Peak Production' levels yet
....


You are kidding, aren't you, Gizmo???



No, I am quite serious...

Peak Oil means, basically that the oil producers (whether companies or countries) are producing as much oil as they possible can..Right?

But the OPEC countries are NOT...they have reduced their 'barrels per day' production at least 5 times in the last decade....which means, IF they wanted to they could increase far more oil, on a daily basis, than they are currently doing.

So OPEC is NOT at 'Peak' production levels....


But, you were also serious about the Saudi Reserves, until told that the Saudi's & other OPEC members had arbitrarily increased their reserves in the mid 80's.

By way of further information on OPEC reserves -

The ME OPEC Reserves Anomalies
Based on published data, the ME OPEC countries contain more than 50% of the World's remaining producible oil reserves. Understanding the reliability of these reserves estimates is therefore vital to the future of the oil driven growth in the World Economy.

The anomalous nature of ME OPEC reserves, illustrated below for Kuwait (Figure 2), can be summarised as follows:

1. Reserves were uplifted by 38% in 1984. This does not relate to any verifiable new field discoveries. If Kuwait was the only country to have done this it might be excused as rectifying a past mistake. But in the period 1984 to 1987 all of the ME OPEC countries uplifted reserves by large amounts in this period (Figure 3). For example, the UAE increased their oil reserves by 295% in 1986. One view of these anomalous revisions is that they are related to OPEC quota negotiations and are not founded on geological or engineering data.

2. Following this arbitrary uplift, reserves have more or less remained unchanged. Most significantly, no deductions have been made for production for around 20 years.





The Big 5 ME OPEC producers all show a similar history to Kuwait, with large arbitrary uplift in reserves during the 1980s, followed by "flat line" reserves histories lacking evidence for depletion, though additions are evident in Iran and Iraq.




So much for Reserves, but suffice to say, the reserves quoted clearly are not there!

That said, you say that OPEC have reduced their 'barrels per day' production production a number of times over the last decade.

The reality is that there were two substantial Production declines, the first following the 9/11 attacks & the 2nd following the current GFC, both relate to declining Demand, due to the Economic slowdowns that followed both events.

However, whilst the period mid 2004 to mid 2008 was a relatively stable period, the Oil Price went thru the roof, but production remained stable.

It defies believe that whilst prices rise dramatically and Demand also rose during the 2004-2008 period (in line with Economic & Population Growth), that Oil Production (Supply) did not also rise in line with Growth during that period.

If both Demand & Price are rising, then Economics 101 would see Supply (Production) increase , to take advantage of that situation.

However, Supply (Production) did not rise in line with Growth during that period & it is still only just holding onto current Production.

Why, Because fields such as Ghawar (in Saudi Arabia) & Burgan (in Kuwait) are now in decline and that is why Production will not recover!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm
No again, The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....

It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.

It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:05pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm:
No again,
2) The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.



1) It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....


1) Yes, I'm aware of what the strategic Reserves are!

2) Yes, I'm aware of what the so called, "proven or estimated underground Reserves are, they are the figures shown in the graphs in my earlier post at 12.10pm.

If you do a rough total on the big 5 Middle East country Reserves graph, you will see they add up to about 720 BILLION Barrels and the estimated total Reserves (according to official figures) left in the world is about 1.2 TRILLION. It is also estimated that we have already used 1.2 trillion barrels, hence we have reached Peak Oil Production.

So, the 5 big M/E produces supposedly have 60% of the worlds remaining "proven?? undergroung Reserves), which of course is not correct, as the OPEC/Middle East, do not actually have what they say they have!

Even if you take the so called "proven inderground Reserves" of 1.2 Trillion and divide it by the current annual Global consumption, which is around 85 Million Barrels P/Day, I think you may get an indication of where we really are?

Btw, those US Strategic Reserves you spoke of are only about 4 Billion Barrels in total, of which around 1.5 Billion barrels is controlled by the US government.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:10pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:05pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm:
No again,
2) The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.



1) It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....


1) Yes, I'm aware of what the strategic Reserves are!

2) Yes, I'm aware of what the so called, "proven or estimated underground Reserves are, they are the figures shown in the graphs in my earlier post at 12.10pm.

If you do a rough total on the big 5 Middle East country Reserves graph, you will see they add up to about 720 BILLION Barrels and the estimated total Reserves (according to official figures) left in the world is about 1.2 TRILLION. It is also estimated that we have already used 1.2 trillion barrels, hence we have reached Peak Oil Production.

So, the 5 big M/E produces supposedly have 60% of the worlds remaining "proven?? undergroung Reserves), which of course is not correct, as the OPEC/Middle East, do not actually have what they say they have!

Btw, even if you take the so called "proven inderground Reserves" of 1.2 Trillion and divide it by the current annual Global consumption, which is around 85 Million Barrels P/Day, I think you may get an indication of where we really are?



Yes, but that ISN'T 'Peak Oil' .....that is an oil shortage, or the runout point for oil..

An entirely different thing......and incidently, Iraq estimates that at current usage rates they (Iraq alone) have 150 years worth of oil...

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:16pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:10pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:05pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm:
No again,
2) The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.



1) It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....


1) Yes, I'm aware of what the strategic Reserves are!

2) Yes, I'm aware of what the so called, "proven or estimated underground Reserves are, they are the figures shown in the graphs in my earlier post at 12.10pm.

If you do a rough total on the big 5 Middle East country Reserves graph, you will see they add up to about 720 BILLION Barrels and the estimated total Reserves (according to official figures) left in the world is about 1.2 TRILLION. It is also estimated that we have already used 1.2 trillion barrels, hence we have reached Peak Oil Production.

So, the 5 big M/E produces supposedly have 60% of the worlds remaining "proven?? undergroung Reserves), which of course is not correct, as the OPEC/Middle East, do not actually have what they say they have!

Btw, even if you take the so called "proven inderground Reserves" of 1.2 Trillion and divide it by the current annual Global consumption, which is around 85 Million Barrels P/Day, I think you may get an indication of where we really are?



Yes, but that ISN'T 'Peak Oil' .....that is an oil shortage, or the runout point for oil..

An entirely different thing......and incidently, Iraq estimates that at current usage rates they (Iraq alone) have 150 years worth of oil...


Utter rubbish, Gizmo, you have no idea what you are taking about!

There are none so blind, as those who do not wish to see!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:22pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:10pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:05pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm:
No again,
2) The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.



1) It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....


1) Yes, I'm aware of what the strategic Reserves are!

2) Yes, I'm aware of what the so called, "proven or estimated underground Reserves are, they are the figures shown in the graphs in my earlier post at 12.10pm.

If you do a rough total on the big 5 Middle East country Reserves graph, you will see they add up to about 720 BILLION Barrels and the estimated total Reserves (according to official figures) left in the world is about 1.2 TRILLION. It is also estimated that we have already used 1.2 trillion barrels, hence we have reached Peak Oil Production.

So, the 5 big M/E produces supposedly have 60% of the worlds remaining "proven?? undergroung Reserves), which of course is not correct, as the OPEC/Middle East, do not actually have what they say they have!

Btw, even if you take the so called "proven inderground Reserves" of 1.2 Trillion and divide it by the current annual Global consumption, which is around 85 Million Barrels P/Day, I think you may get an indication of where we really are?



Yes, but that ISN'T 'Peak Oil' .....that is an oil shortage, or the runout point for oil..

An entirely different thing......and incidently, Iraq estimates that at current usage rates they (Iraq alone) have 150 years worth of oil...


Utter rubbish, Gizmo, you have no idea what you are taking about!

There are none so blind, as those who do not wish to see!



"Peak oil is the point in time when the maximum rate of global petroleum extraction is reached"

Do you agree with THAT definition??

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:34pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:22pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:10pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:05pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm:
No again,
2) The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.



1) It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....


1) Yes, I'm aware of what the strategic Reserves are!

2) Yes, I'm aware of what the so called, "proven or estimated underground Reserves are, they are the figures shown in the graphs in my earlier post at 12.10pm.

If you do a rough total on the big 5 Middle East country Reserves graph, you will see they add up to about 720 BILLION Barrels and the estimated total Reserves (according to official figures) left in the world is about 1.2 TRILLION. It is also estimated that we have already used 1.2 trillion barrels, hence we have reached Peak Oil Production.

So, the 5 big M/E produces supposedly have 60% of the worlds remaining "proven?? undergroung Reserves), which of course is not correct, as the OPEC/Middle East, do not actually have what they say they have!

Btw, even if you take the so called "proven inderground Reserves" of 1.2 Trillion and divide it by the current annual Global consumption, which is around 85 Million Barrels P/Day, I think you may get an indication of where we really are?



Yes, but that ISN'T 'Peak Oil' .....that is an oil shortage, or the runout point for oil..

An entirely different thing......and incidently, Iraq estimates that at current usage rates they (Iraq alone) have 150 years worth of oil...


Utter rubbish, Gizmo, you have no idea what you are taking about!

There are none so blind, as those who do not wish to see!



"Peak oil is the point in time when the maximum rate of global petroleum extraction is reached"

Do you agree with THAT definition??


Extraction/Production same thing and that is where we are now, at the predicted plateau, just before Production/Extraction goes into terminal decline!

Oil Production has flatlined for about 5 years now, it is dying, with various fields & countries having hit Peak Production and since gone into decline, the onlt thing left is the final Global tipping point, which are a couple of older/major Middle East fields that are now under stress and when their flows can not longer be maintained, then its goodbye to the plateau and hello to the downslope!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:55pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:34pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:22pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:10pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:05pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm:
No again,
2) The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.



1) It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....


1) Yes, I'm aware of what the strategic Reserves are!

2) Yes, I'm aware of what the so called, "proven or estimated underground Reserves are, they are the figures shown in the graphs in my earlier post at 12.10pm.

If you do a rough total on the big 5 Middle East country Reserves graph, you will see they add up to about 720 BILLION Barrels and the estimated total Reserves (according to official figures) left in the world is about 1.2 TRILLION. It is also estimated that we have already used 1.2 trillion barrels, hence we have reached Peak Oil Production.

So, the 5 big M/E produces supposedly have 60% of the worlds remaining "proven?? undergroung Reserves), which of course is not correct, as the OPEC/Middle East, do not actually have what they say they have!

Btw, even if you take the so called "proven inderground Reserves" of 1.2 Trillion and divide it by the current annual Global consumption, which is around 85 Million Barrels P/Day, I think you may get an indication of where we really are?



Yes, but that ISN'T 'Peak Oil' .....that is an oil shortage, or the runout point for oil..

An entirely different thing......and incidently, Iraq estimates that at current usage rates they (Iraq alone) have 150 years worth of oil...


Utter rubbish, Gizmo, you have no idea what you are taking about!

There are none so blind, as those who do not wish to see!



"Peak oil is the point in time when the maximum rate of global petroleum extraction is reached"

Do you agree with THAT definition??


Extraction/Production same thing and that is where we are now, at the predicted plateau, just before Production/Extraction goes into terminal decline!

Oil Production has flatlined for about 5 years now, it is dying, with various fields & countries having hit Peak Production and since gone into decline, the onlt thing left is the final Global tipping point, which are a couple of older/major Middle East fields that are now under stress and when their flows can not longer be maintained, then its goodbye to the plateau and hello to the downslope!



So, given that the OPEC countries are Extracting/Producing at about 50-75% of their actual maximum capacity...

Are we really at the 'Peak Oil' point??


Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 31st, 2010 at 3:18pm
Perceptions, You and I both know that to assess and analyze the phenomenon of Peak Oil, the recommended period of data extrapolation is 3 decades minimum.

Otherwise you run the risk of taking a piece of data which is subject to short term factors.

You're using 5 years.

1/6th of the recommended data.

Any reason why?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:19pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:55pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:34pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:22pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:10pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:05pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm:
No again,
2) The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.



1) It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....


1) Yes, I'm aware of what the strategic Reserves are!

2) Yes, I'm aware of what the so called, "proven or estimated underground Reserves are, they are the figures shown in the graphs in my earlier post at 12.10pm.

If you do a rough total on the big 5 Middle East country Reserves graph, you will see they add up to about 720 BILLION Barrels and the estimated total Reserves (according to official figures) left in the world is about 1.2 TRILLION. It is also estimated that we have already used 1.2 trillion barrels, hence we have reached Peak Oil Production.

So, the 5 big M/E produces supposedly have 60% of the worlds remaining "proven?? undergroung Reserves), which of course is not correct, as the OPEC/Middle East, do not actually have what they say they have!

Btw, even if you take the so called "proven inderground Reserves" of 1.2 Trillion and divide it by the current annual Global consumption, which is around 85 Million Barrels P/Day, I think you may get an indication of where we really are?



Yes, but that ISN'T 'Peak Oil' .....that is an oil shortage, or the runout point for oil..

An entirely different thing......and incidently, Iraq estimates that at current usage rates they (Iraq alone) have 150 years worth of oil...


Utter rubbish, Gizmo, you have no idea what you are taking about!

There are none so blind, as those who do not wish to see!



"Peak oil is the point in time when the maximum rate of global petroleum extraction is reached"

Do you agree with THAT definition??


Extraction/Production same thing and that is where we are now, at the predicted plateau, just before Production/Extraction goes into terminal decline!

Oil Production has flatlined for about 5 years now, it is dying, with various fields & countries having hit Peak Production and since gone into decline, the onlt thing left is the final Global tipping point, which are a couple of older/major Middle East fields that are now under stress and when their flows can not longer be maintained, then its goodbye to the plateau and hello to the downslope!



So, given that the OPEC countries are Extracting/Producing at about 50-75% of their actual maximum capacity...
Are we really at the 'Peak Oil' point??


I would give that claim (OPEC spare capacity) about the same amount of credibility, as the other OPEC claims that their massive increase of Reserves in the mid 80's was vaild and that they could subsequently pump Oil for 25 years, with lowering those Reserves by even a single barrel!

It's just more -

Credible
Reliable
Abundant
Paradoxes

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by laborfornever on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:27pm
petrol is pretty cheap when you consider what it enables you to do, if you can't afford petrol or think its too expensive maybe you should get a job.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:29pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 3:18pm:
Perceptions, You and I both know that to assess and analyze the phenomenon of Peak Oil, the recommended period of data extrapolation is 3 decades minimum.

Otherwise you run the risk of taking a piece of data which is subject to short term factors.

You're using 5 years.

1/6th of the recommended data.

Any reason why?


What happened to the one decade you used to use, Andrei?

In any event, I never agreed with your assertion, when it was at 10 years and I certainly wouldn't agree to anything like 30 years!

It would take 10 years at the flat out pace of a Manhattan style project, Globally, to get geared up for a transition from Oil to something else, if something else was available, which it isn't!

If we waited for 30 years after Peaked Oil became reality, before then declaring Peak Oil and then moving into a mitigation phase, then you would not only consign the Global Economy to the toilet, but you would also shunt humanity toward extinction!


Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:31pm

laborfornever wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:27pm:
petrol is pretty cheap when you consider what it enables you to do, if you can't afford petrol or think its too expensive maybe you should get a job.


L4n,
Are you talking to SOMEONE or just YOURSELF?

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 31st, 2010 at 5:53pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:19pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:55pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:34pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:22pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:16pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:10pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 2:05pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 1:08pm:
No again,
2) The 'reserves' I referred to were the OPEC 'oil in place' reserves.....Not how much is stored in an oil storage tank somewhere....It's an estimate of how much oil remains under ground.



1) It's very different to the 'Strategic Oil Reserve' amounts quoted by the US government, that's how much stockpiled oil they have to use for the military in case of war.....


1) Yes, I'm aware of what the strategic Reserves are!

2) Yes, I'm aware of what the so called, "proven or estimated underground Reserves are, they are the figures shown in the graphs in my earlier post at 12.10pm.

If you do a rough total on the big 5 Middle East country Reserves graph, you will see they add up to about 720 BILLION Barrels and the estimated total Reserves (according to official figures) left in the world is about 1.2 TRILLION. It is also estimated that we have already used 1.2 trillion barrels, hence we have reached Peak Oil Production.

So, the 5 big M/E produces supposedly have 60% of the worlds remaining "proven?? undergroung Reserves), which of course is not correct, as the OPEC/Middle East, do not actually have what they say they have!

Btw, even if you take the so called "proven inderground Reserves" of 1.2 Trillion and divide it by the current annual Global consumption, which is around 85 Million Barrels P/Day, I think you may get an indication of where we really are?



Yes, but that ISN'T 'Peak Oil' .....that is an oil shortage, or the runout point for oil..

An entirely different thing......and incidently, Iraq estimates that at current usage rates they (Iraq alone) have 150 years worth of oil...


Utter rubbish, Gizmo, you have no idea what you are taking about!

There are none so blind, as those who do not wish to see!



"Peak oil is the point in time when the maximum rate of global petroleum extraction is reached"

Do you agree with THAT definition??


Extraction/Production same thing and that is where we are now, at the predicted plateau, just before Production/Extraction goes into terminal decline!

Oil Production has flatlined for about 5 years now, it is dying, with various fields & countries having hit Peak Production and since gone into decline, the onlt thing left is the final Global tipping point, which are a couple of older/major Middle East fields that are now under stress and when their flows can not longer be maintained, then its goodbye to the plateau and hello to the downslope!



So, given that the OPEC countries are Extracting/Producing at about 50-75% of their actual maximum capacity...
Are we really at the 'Peak Oil' point??


I would give that claim (OPEC spare capacity) about the same amount of credibility, as the other OPEC claims that their massive increase of Reserves in the mid 80's was vaild and that they could subsequently pump Oil for 25 years, with lowering those Reserves by even a single barrel!

It's just more -

Credible
Reliable
Abundant
Paradoxes


exactly...the reason OPEC reduced their production levels was NOT because of Peak OIL...it was just to keep the prices UP....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 31st, 2010 at 6:02pm

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:29pm:
What happened to the one decade you used to use, Andrei?

In any event, I never agreed with your assertion, when it was at 10 years and I certainly wouldn't agree to anything like 30 years!

It would take 10 years at the flat out pace of a Manhattan style project, Globally, to get geared up for a transition from Oil to something else, if something else was available, which it isn't!

If we waited for 30 years after Peaked Oil became reality, before then declaring Peak Oil and then moving into a mitigation phase, then you would not only consign the Global Economy to the toilet, but you would also shunt humanity toward extinction!


Now I know you have read enough about peak oil theory to know as much about as I do.

If you take a 5 year period, you would not encompass natural progression or regression trends on such a theory which transcends generations.

Take for example if you took the oil shock of the 1970s as the base of your theory. You'd think we'd run about by about 1987 on that.

Peak oil can be detected from the measurement over a decades long timegraph.
It cannot be detected by picking a short 5 year period and basing your argument on that.

5 years in a click of your fingers in the oil industry.

Remember also, the theory does not allowed for advances in technology - you are totally ignoring that.

In this decade we can map the entire ocean floor without drilling, we can go down to depths completely out of our reach only one decade ago.

We can drill further down on the ocean floor and at depths far beyond capability of the 1990s.

We can drill further, safer and cleaner.

Peak oil theory takes current known oil fields and applies little logic for advancement.
A dangerous game.

It may help to explain why the date that oil peak has happened has moved back 6 times.
In fact we originally were going to run out of oil in 1982 at one point....


Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by gizmo_2655 on Aug 31st, 2010 at 6:38pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 6:02pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:29pm:
What happened to the one decade you used to use, Andrei?

In any event, I never agreed with your assertion, when it was at 10 years and I certainly wouldn't agree to anything like 30 years!

It would take 10 years at the flat out pace of a Manhattan style project, Globally, to get geared up for a transition from Oil to something else, if something else was available, which it isn't!

If we waited for 30 years after Peaked Oil became reality, before then declaring Peak Oil and then moving into a mitigation phase, then you would not only consign the Global Economy to the toilet, but you would also shunt humanity toward extinction!


Now I know you have read enough about peak oil theory to know as much about as I do.

If you take a 5 year period, you would not encompass natural progression or regression trends on such a theory which transcends generations.

Take for example if you took the oil shock of the 1970s as the base of your theory. You'd think we'd run about by about 1987 on that.

Peak oil can be detected from the measurement over a decades long timegraph.
It cannot be detected by picking a short 5 year period and basing your argument on that.

5 years in a click of your fingers in the oil industry.

Remember also, the theory does not allowed for advances in technology - you are totally ignoring that.

In this decade we can map the entire ocean floor without drilling, we can go down to depths completely out of our reach only one decade ago.

We can drill further down on the ocean floor and at depths far beyond capability of the 1990s.

We can drill further, safer and cleaner.

Peak oil theory takes current known oil fields and applies little logic for advancement.
A dangerous game.

It may help to explain why the date that oil peak has happened has moved back 6 times.
In fact we originally were going to run out of oil in 1982 at one point....



Exactly Andrei....every time in the past, (e.g the 60's, 70's and 80's) that the 'oil has runout'..we've just gone out and 'found' more oil fields...

And surprise surprise...they've 'just' discovered OIL in Afghanistan....

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 6:53pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 6:02pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:29pm:
What happened to the one decade you used to use, Andrei?

In any event, I never agreed with your assertion, when it was at 10 years and I certainly wouldn't agree to anything like 30 years!

It would take 10 years at the flat out pace of a Manhattan style project, Globally, to get geared up for a transition from Oil to something else, if something else was available, which it isn't!

If we waited for 30 years after Peaked Oil became reality, before then declaring Peak Oil and then moving into a mitigation phase, then you would not only consign the Global Economy to the toilet, but you would also shunt humanity toward extinction!


Now I know you have read enough about peak oil theory to know as much about as I do.

If you take a 5 year period, you would not encompass natural progression or regression trends on such a theory which transcends generations.

Take for example if you took the oil shock of the 1970s as the base of your theory. You'd think we'd run about by about 1987 on that.

Peak oil can be detected from the measurement over a decades long timegraph.
It cannot be detected by picking a short 5 year period and basing your argument on that.

5 years in a click of your fingers in the oil industry.

Remember also, the theory does not allowed for advances in technology - you are totally ignoring that.

In this decade we can map the entire ocean floor without drilling, we can go down to depths completely out of our reach only one decade ago.

We can drill further down on the ocean floor and at depths far beyond capability of the 1990s.

We can drill further, safer and cleaner.

Peak oil theory takes current known oil fields and applies little logic for advancement.
A dangerous game.

It may help to explain why the date that oil peak has happened has moved back 6 times.
In fact we originally were going to run out of oil in 1982 at one point....


Andrei,
Have a look at Table 1. Oil Production Through Time, in the following site, it details when various nations HAVE ALREADY PEAKED & THE EXPECTED DATES for others.

Although the report uses 1997 data, I think the majority of the Peak dates will prove to be around the mark. Of interest, they predicted 2002 would be Australia's Peak, which was spot on. They predicted Mexico had Peaked in 1998,  it was actually 2003 before it really Peaked. They suggested that North Sea Oil would Peak in 2001, it actually Peaked in 1999.

In fact, of the 42 major Oil Production nations listed, they suggested that 37 would have Peaked by NOW, leaving a few of the older, super producers still to Peak, such as Saudi Arabia (in 2011), Kuwait (2018) & the UAE (2017).

No doubt there will be some ups & downs, a few years here and there, but in essence, we have Peaked!

Btw, I don't know where you get those gems about moving Peal Oil back 6 times or about Oil running out in 1982!

In fact, Hubbert said that USA Production would Peak around 1970-1972, it actually Peaked in 1970. Hubbert also said that Global Production would Peak just after 2000 and as far as I'm concerned it did effectively Peak in around 2005!

The rest of what you said, will make little difference in the overall grand scheme of events!


http://www.mnforsustain.org/oil_duncan_and_youngquist_encircling_oil.htm

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 7:04pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 6:38pm:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 6:02pm:

perceptions_now wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 4:29pm:
What happened to the one decade you used to use, Andrei?

In any event, I never agreed with your assertion, when it was at 10 years and I certainly wouldn't agree to anything like 30 years!

It would take 10 years at the flat out pace of a Manhattan style project, Globally, to get geared up for a transition from Oil to something else, if something else was available, which it isn't!

If we waited for 30 years after Peaked Oil became reality, before then declaring Peak Oil and then moving into a mitigation phase, then you would not only consign the Global Economy to the toilet, but you would also shunt humanity toward extinction!


Now I know you have read enough about peak oil theory to know as much about as I do.

If you take a 5 year period, you would not encompass natural progression or regression trends on such a theory which transcends generations.

Take for example if you took the oil shock of the 1970s as the base of your theory. You'd think we'd run about by about 1987 on that.

Peak oil can be detected from the measurement over a decades long timegraph.
It cannot be detected by picking a short 5 year period and basing your argument on that.

5 years in a click of your fingers in the oil industry.

Remember also, the theory does not allowed for advances in technology - you are totally ignoring that.

In this decade we can map the entire ocean floor without drilling, we can go down to depths completely out of our reach only one decade ago.

We can drill further down on the ocean floor and at depths far beyond capability of the 1990s.

We can drill further, safer and cleaner.

Peak oil theory takes current known oil fields and applies little logic for advancement.
A dangerous game.

It may help to explain why the date that oil peak has happened has moved back 6 times.
In fact we originally were going to run out of oil in 1982 at one point....



Exactly Andrei....every time in the past, (e.g the 60's, 70's and 80's) that the 'oil has runout'..we've just gone out and 'found' more oil fields...

And surprise surprise...they've 'just' discovered OIL in Afghanistan....



That is also not correct!

Oil discoveries Peaked around the mid 1960's and whilst there are continuing discoveries they are no where near the size of the massive fields found earlier last century.

And some of those newer discoveries, such as Cantarell in Mexico & the North Sea fields have been exploited into a double quick extinction.

Finally, the recent Oil discovery in Afghanistan, whilst hardly massive, may confirm the real reason for the USA being there, which is the same reason they are in Iraq!

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 7:10pm
In any event, I don't know why this thread is on the Politicians Suck board, clearly it didn't start in that vain & hasn't looked like it since.

So, if anyone wants to continue discussions on Petrol Pricing, Peak Oil &/or associates issues, please go to The Peak Energy Debate @


http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1276908003/all

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by Andrei.Hicks on Aug 31st, 2010 at 8:23pm
Perceptions -

Do you deny that technology on oil drilling has advanced considerably in the last decade alone?

Do you agree we can drill deeper, safer and cleaner than ever before?

This all must be taken into account.
Oil is becoming more and more reachable and we can drill in ever more remote places.

Title: Re: We Must Cut The Price Of Petrol.
Post by perceptions_now on Aug 31st, 2010 at 9:09pm

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Aug 31st, 2010 at 8:23pm:
Perceptions -

Do you deny that technology on oil drilling has advanced considerably in the last decade alone?

Do you agree we can drill deeper, safer and cleaner than ever before?

This all must be taken into account.
Oil is becoming more and more reachable and we can drill in ever more remote places.


See answer @
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1276908003/90

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.