Enough of this shyte already, Macca:

---

It wasn't going to be long before the computer virus known as SLR infected this site.
How long before the mods on here get so clogged up with spam that they have to  close down?

FFS nemesis

that's the BEST you can do!

I ask the hard questions that I know you CAN'T and WON'T have the intellect to answer so you decide to count the number of threads

You are sad!!

Equitist wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 12:27pm:

Enough of this shyte already, Macca:

could be he is pierce Akerman? :o

LOL, Macca...keep your thong on!

You're the one franticallly self-flagellating, to paint that partisan picture...

So, don't shoot this messenger, until we've received constructive feedback from the rest of the OzPolitic community...

Viva la internet democracy!

;)

now the social apologists claims to be "the messenger"

:-/

just like Gillard - she claims to be the messenger but under pressure she admits to being the mastermind

Keep it up, Macca - and you will be shot down!

Naturallly, I mean that in the nicest possible way...

:-*

Hint: don't you have several older threads to be busily spamming upon - so as to push this one off the page!?

::)

I have NEVER been shot down in the last 3 years by you or ANY lefties on here or anywhere else

you lefties don't have the mental capacity to surpass me so GAME ON MOLE

8-)

btw

those who don't understand this by-play between my self and nemesis/equitist

I have b1tch slapped EVERY lefty on the Yahoo message board in the last 3 years and they can't wait to tear me down

I set myself up as a tall poppy so I can have ALL my points scrutinised and debated

I have won EVERYTIME!

So bring it on - but if you are going to take me on and challenge me to provide credible evidence for my comments then you too will be put under the same microscope

the lefties have failed each and everytime I put them under the credibility microscope

Who will be next?!

It may be a good time to get over yourself.

LOL, Annie...Macca and me have been jocular sparring partners for a long time...

She's really a cute little dear - prolific in marking her territory but mostly harmless...

She's a sweet little doe, who enjoys stealing the political spotlight - all the bloody time...

But...but she's fun to watch, shaking dumbfounded, in the headlights and sights of her ol' nemeses...

::)

Oh, dear!

Speaking of moles...I didn't mean to embarrass you, Macca - you should be free to do that yourself...

Come out, come out, wherever you are...

:-*

Stop giving away secrets nemesis

If Annie wants to take me on then let her - I haven't come up against a strong opponent....actually I haven't come up against one at all

Sorry, Macca, for my delayed yawn...

Then, much to my dismay: I coudn't find one...

So, this'll do  :P

Quote:

If Annie wants to take me on then let her

Maybe I'd think about it if you actually posted something worthy of debate.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 4:49pm:

Quote: Maqqa Quote If Annie wants to take me on then let her Maybe I'd think about it if you actually posted something worthy of debate.

You show great insight, Annie!

Maqqa wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 4:28pm:

Stop giving away secrets nemesis If Annie wants to take me on then let her - I haven't come up against a strong opponent....actually I haven't come up against one at all

I know the feeling well.

8-)...Finding logic, common sense in a lefty is like finding a needle in a hay stack.

Sometimes I wish I were a Lefty at heart, this way I might enjoy the challenge.

And to think, I was once a lib-lab defiant, a self described equalist, well, until I delved into it more.

Being left is easy, anyone can be a f-wit.

Remember this little gem....

Labour Party MP Shahid Malik has predicted the total Islamification of Britain and a Muslim prime minister, Allah willing, within the next thirty years.

The remarks were made at the October 2008 Global Peace and Unity conference held at the Excel London centre, but were deliberately withheld from the video coverage
released of that event. The suppression of the video was
clearly designed to try and limit the damage to the ruling Tory and
Labour elite, whose immigration policies have led to the situation
where a Muslim cabinet minister can confidently predict the total
Islamification of this nation.



http://www.youtube.com/v/IWmvqDWnGzI&rel=1&fs=1&showsea...



Their media did everything in it's power to stifle this twits comments, they way ours do whenever our Labor members make fools of themselves also.

It's the illogical leftist mentality that's concerning, and I think Rudd knew this, which is why he tried the "right" conservative approach/look, though was heavily scrutinised.

This and did a terrible job of it.

8-)

Quote:

Finding logic, common sense in a lefty is like finding a needle in a hay stack. Sometimes I wish I were a Lefty at heart, this way I might enjoy the challenge. And to think, I was once a lib-lab defiant, a self described equalist, well, until I delved into it more. Being left is easy, anyone can be a f-wit.

Didn't you say you were here to discuss politics? Is that your idea of a debate?

You're not very smart, are you? Don't worry - I'll remember to make allowances.

Yer, what Perceptions said!

Well, this is afterall a flame thread about political spammers, so, didn't really think you would mind.

One mans spam is another mans treasure, perhaps if you feel overwhelmed by some of your more right-wing posters commentary, you could impose some restrictions.

Make it so  they may not bring (right-wing) discussion to the boards, rather may only speak when spoken to.

I distinctly recall an individual "nemest" over on yahoo drowning out/obstructing some of our worthwhile political topics with their relentless forum links and spiritual diatribe/advice.

So, yes, we know the 'Light' only too well.

 8-)

Quote:

if you feel overwhelmed by some of your more right-wing posters commentary

Ah, is that what you call it? "Commentary."

I could have sworn it was more tedious sh1tslinging.

Maybe you were trying to make an impact by insulting half the members of the board? Well done.

Is this what you do with right-wing posters when you cant get the better of them?

Start threads to flame them on what's supposed to be a forum for serious political discussion, banter?

Well, with a forum titled "Politics sux" you don't expect intelligent life form to take you too seriously now do you?

When it sounds like something a 12 year old might scrawl on the back of a toilet door, much like the rest of your immature right-wing flaming  commentary it would appear.

My grandmother tried to teach me to reason with irrational leftist individuals like yourself diplomatically, but I'm not very good with PR, so instead I just hand out a compliment or two for every insult I receive.

And here's yours.... I like your forums Airs Rock header.


Laters....

;)

mellie wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 5:36pm:

Well, this is afterall a flame thread about political spammers, so, didn't really think you would mind. One mans spam is another mans treasure, perhaps if you feel overwhelmed by some of your more right-wing posters commentary, you could impose some restrictions. Make it so  they may not bring (right-wing) discussion to the boards, rather may only speak when spoken to. I distinctly recall an individual "nemest" over on yahoo drowning out/obstructing some of our worthwhile political topics with their relentless forum links and spiritual diatribe/advice. So, yes, we know the 'Light' only too well.  8-)

ROFPMSL...methinks you have this atheist confused with someone else!?

The most boring thing about so many ardent Liberal/Labour supporters is that cheerleading seems to be all that they can do. I've noticed the vast majority of them don't really like to discuss actual issues; to them, discussing the actual issues which political matters concern is ancilliary to discussing politicians and slandering the opposing side.

It's all very uninteresting.

Quote:

"Politics sux"

I know I promised to make allowances, but really.

It's Politicians Suck, and it's supposed to be for discussion about sh1tty politicians, not attacks on other members for their political beliefs.


Quote:

When it sounds like something a 12 year old might scrawl on the back of a toilet door, much like the rest of your immature right-wing flaming  commentary it would appear.

Oh the irony.

Yeah.."Laters"

Annie Anthrax wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 4:49pm:

Quote: If Annie wants to take me on then let her Maybe I'd think about it if you actually posted something worthy of debate.

I think you will be hard pressed to find something worthy of debate with the serial spammer known here as maqqa.

I figured :)

mellie wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 5:59pm:

My grandmother tried to teach me to reason with irrational leftist individuals like yourself diplomatically, but I'm not very good with PR, so instead I just hand out a compliment or two for every insult I receive. And here's yours.... I like your forums Airs Rock header. Laters.... ;)

Not a fan of Uluru myself, so I call it Ayers Rock.

Annie Anthrax wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 7:13pm:

I figured :)

You are evidently a very wise person, Annie.

I came over here to get away from that spamming.

Looks like I will just have to get outdoors more.

Thankfully it's not usually an issue, Froggie.

But outdoors is good :)

Nemesis loves to count the number of posts

Lets count the number of posts in thread - then look at the title of the thread

One wonder if the creator of the thread is interested in political debate or is she simply too simple to come up with a coherent answer  :o

mellie wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 5:36pm:

Well, this is afterall a flame thread about political spammers, so, didn't really think you would mind. One mans spam is another mans treasure, perhaps if you feel overwhelmed by some of your more right-wing posters commentary, you could impose some restrictions. Make it so  they may not bring (right-wing) discussion to the boards, rather may only speak when spoken to. I distinctly recall an individual "nemest" over on yahoo drowning out/obstructing some of our worthwhile political topics with their relentless forum links and spiritual diatribe/advice. So, yes, we know the 'Light' only too well.  8-)

OK, Mellie, now that my kids and me have full bellies, I thought I should give a fuller response...

You are correct, this thread was created in jest...

Macca and me go way back - and our interpersonal exchanges aren't as venomous as they may at first appear...

I may poke fun to lighten the mood - and I take as good as I give - but I certainly don't take myself all that seriously...

The same is true for a lot of others on here - especially those who have come over from Yahoo - you might like to keep that in mind...

As far as I can see, there are a lot of well-established right whingers on here - and they may actually outnumber the lefties...

Either way, I've perceived no definite left/right bias...

No hard feelings from me! (Yet ;))

Cheers

Nem


PS The original 'Light' has ventured over here too - and has been true to form!

LOL...I didn't see Macca's last post before I posted mine...

After reading what she had to say, I withdraw what I said about her and resume open hostilities with her...

Only joking, Macca - you know I love to hate you!

;-)

Equitist wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 8:20pm:

LOL...I didn't see Macca's last post before I posted mine... After reading what she had to say, I withdraw what I said about her and resume open hostilities with her... Only joking, Macca - you know I love to hate you! ;-)

ENGARDE  :D

Equitist wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 8:16pm:

mellie wrote on Jun 27th, 2010 at 5:36pm: Well, this is afterall a flame thread about political spammers, so, didn't really think you would mind. One mans spam is another mans treasure, perhaps if you feel overwhelmed by some of your more right-wing posters commentary, you could impose some restrictions. Make it so  they may not bring (right-wing) discussion to the boards, rather may only speak when spoken to. I distinctly recall an individual "nemest" over on yahoo drowning out/obstructing some of our worthwhile political topics with their relentless forum links and spiritual diatribe/advice. So, yes, we know the 'Light' only too well.  8-) OK, Mellie, now that my kids and me have full bellies, I thought I should give a fuller response... You are correct, this thread was created in jest... Macca and me go way back - and our interpersonal exchanges aren't as venomous as they may at first appear... I may poke fun to lighten the mood - and I take as good as I give - but I certainly don't take myself all that seriously... The same is true for a lot of others on here - especially those who have come over from Yahoo - you might like to keep that in mind... As far as I can see, there are a lot of well-established right whingers on here - and they may actually outnumber the lefties... Either way, I've perceived no definite left/right bias... No hard feelings from me! (Yet ;)) Cheers Nem PS The original 'Light' has ventured over here too - and has been true to form!

That's ok, because I'm feeling the light already, nemest  ;)

Equitist wrote on Jun 27^th, 2010 at 12:27pm:

Enough of this shyte already, Macca:

we have a new spammer on board  now "Mellie" but I suspect it could be john masters banned as" longweekend" making a come back under a :o new ID

I am actively contributing to on-topic political discussion, this and have no intentions of even inserting a link to my own forum.

My objective is/was to engage in cut-throat political debate/discussion, (question time style)... apologies if this offends some viewers, and by all means, feel free to report my posts, or formally request my immediate departure form this site.

The rate things are going, believe me, you wont have to ask twice.

8-)

You know the funny thing  maqqa.. Health Ledger (alas the joker) would vote either Green or labor....

;D ;D

wrote on Jun 28^th, 2010 at 8:34am:

You know the funny thing  maqqa.. Health Ledger (alas the joker) would vote either Green or labor.... ;D ;D

I thought he would have put a picture of Tony Abbott....oh! hang on, he did.

Good old Heath was a Green voter, maybe SLR is a bit of a Communist after all?  :)