hi,
australia's future?
it doesn't have one.
not while we are letting SO MANY ppl in here.

recent case in point:
a protest rally re: development of parts of French's Forest.
who's protesting? mainly anglo-saxons.
why? because this land in French's Forest will most likely house ethnics.
us anglos ARE very pissed off with the seemly endless influx of other races.

i hope this rally is successful.
if it is, it might send a message to Arabs, Indians and Orientals to go live somewhere-else.
DR9.

I find it hard to understand why anybody should care about French's Forest residents not wanting ethnics in their backyard, there's a name for that, NIMBY.
Now if  the residents of French's Forest would have been out protesting when all the Muslim and Asians moved into Bankstown that might be a different story.

http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,6626668,00.jpg

You're so predictable Sprintcyclist. What is it you didn't like - their undies or their skin?  ;D

Their bodies look very healthy.

thanks mantra.
have a good chrissy and new year, keep safe and well.

i disapprove of their attitude, demeanour and fashion sense.
Just what ARE they doing ? Urinating into the radiator ?

There is a name for people who dress like that, and it is totallt independent of race, it is, Cretins!

Like moronic "punks" who rebelled against fashion by wearing "punk" fashion, really just too dumb for words to express their stupidity.

As far as the cultural balance of our country, there is a real argument for trying to promote a stronger anglo ratio to the immigration statistics, we are a traditionally anglo country, and a great many of the migrants have come here because they like that, so bringing in people who would seek to change that is not in my interests, and I am happy to say that, while still being also happy to welcome any migrant of any nationality who wants to join our culture, and not impose a foreign one in it's place.

It stands to reason, if they preferred a foreign culture, then they should have gone to the home of that culture, not come to our home and seek to change it.

mozzaok wrote on Dec 24^th, 2009 at 1:24pm:

Like moronic "punks" who rebelled against fashion by wearing "punk" fashion, really just too dumb for words to express their stupidity.

Popular kulcha, innit?

"Damn my education I can't find the words to say
About all the things caught in my mind."


The anthem of a generation or three.

Quote:

As far as the cultural balance of our country, there is a real argument for trying to promote a stronger anglo ratio to the immigration statistics

Agreed, except for the good of the nation our immigrants should be entirely Anglo-Saxon in demographic profile.


Quote:

we are a traditionally anglo country, and a great many of the migrants have come here because they like that

Correct; but also incorrect. Most immigrants do not come here because there is something attractive to them about Anglo-Saxon societies (many of them actually exercise an overt disdain for Anglo-Saxons period); which is why multiculturalism is such an attractive social policy for so many of them, because from such an ideology flows the ability to retain their cultural traditions while still allowing them to fulfill their main reason for being here; prosperity and greatly improved living standards. It is not the Anglo-Saxon society that motivates the migratory waves, but rather, the Anglo-Saxon economy.


Quote:

so bringing in people who would seek to change that is not in my interests

If you believe this, why are you so denunciatory of those who oppose multiculturalism and characterize those who don't support the essentially identical progressive policies of the political mainsteam as extremists?


Quote:

while still being also happy to welcome any migrant of any nationality who wants to join our culture, and not impose a foreign one in it's place.

This is a nice dream but in practice is simply impossible. Our ancestors understood this (and without the aid of sophisticated evolutionary and scientific understanding), which is why the White Australia policy existed.

djrbfm wrote on Sep 25^th, 2009 at 12:12am:

hi, australia's future? it doesn't have one. not while we are letting SO MANY ppl in here. recent case in point: a protest rally re: development of parts of French's Forest. who's protesting? mainly anglo-saxons. why? because this land in French's Forest will most likely house ethnics. us anglos ARE very pissed off with the seemly endless influx of other races. i hope this rally is successful. if it is, it might send a message to Arabs, Indians and Orientals to go live somewhere-else. DR9.

Hm, I have sympathy for your Skittish pain but let’s be pragmatic and rational.
I don’t think your approach is wise one. If for example you don’t let Muslims live in French Forest but only in Auburn and Bankstown then shortly, encouraged by EU and USA, they will ask for independent country Auburn or Bankstown to be separated from Australia.
In that case only China can help you.