Quote:

It is hot in Brussels. Ramadan has begun. The faithful in the predominantly Muslim borough of Molenbeek are not allowed to eat or drink from sunrise until sunset. Non-Muslim policemen, patrolling the streets of Molenbeek in their sweltering cars, are not allowed to eat or drink either. As every year during Ramadan, that they have been told by their superior, Philippe Moureaux, the Socialist mayor of Molenbeek, they have to respect Muslim sensitivities and not to “provoke” Muslims by violating Islamic Ramadan restrictions in public. In effect, Islamic or Sharia law is already applied - for everyone - in the Muslim areas of Brussels. Barely two miles from Molenbeek lies Brussels’ European district. One of its huge glass and concrete buildings is the European Parliament where the elected representatives from the 27 members states of the European Union (EU) convene. The 736 MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) have just returned from their summer break. They are mostly unaware of life in Molenbeek. Most of them never go to that part of the city. It is probably a sensible decision, because Molenbeek is known to be unsafe for non-Muslims. Nevertheless, it is a shame that Europe’s politicians are unaware of day-to-day life just around the corner. It means that most of the 736 MEPs, who make up the second largest democratically elected assembly in the world (after India), do not know what life really is like in an ever growing section of Europe’s urban areas. A walking tour of Molenbeek should be compulsory for every MEP. Some friends in Brussels organize one-hour trips through Molenbeek. They go in an inconspicuous car, driven by a local who knows the escape routes, and with a bodyguard. Otherwise the risk would be too great. These trips are called “safaris.” Similar “Eurabia Safaris” are organized in other European cities. One of the highlights - though absolutely not the most dangerous one - of the safari in Rosengaard, the Muslim section of the Swedish city of Malmö, is a short stop, to give the visitor the opportunity to take a quick snapshot, in front of Malmö’s “Jihadskörkortsteori” (Jihad Driving School). The Sharia areas of Europe are expanding rapidly across Western Europe. While currently still restricted to what the French officially call the ZUS (zones urbaines sensibles - sensitive urban areas) these areas are growing fast. Even today, eight million of the sixty million inhabitants of France already live in one of the country’s 751 ZUS. The month of Ramadan is traditionally the most dangerous time of the year in Europe’s sensitive areas. After sunset, the Ramadan ban on eating, drinking and engaging in sexual activities expires until the following sunrise. Ramadan is a period of nightly feasts for Muslims. Young Muslims are extremely touchy. These feasts easily spill over into nightly spasms of mayhem, vandalism, and violence. Europe’s Ramadan riots often go on for days or weeks, during which hundreds of cars, shops and public buildings are set on fire. In Muslim countries, such as Indonesia, the police step up patrols during Ramadan in order to crack down on illegal nightly activities. In Europe, however, the police have been given orders to adopt an extra-low profile not to “provoke” Muslim populations. In countries such as Britain, police officers have had to attend “Ramadan awareness” courses. They have even been ordered, “for reasons of religious sensitivity,” to avoid the execution of arrest warrants for Muslims during the month of Ramadan. During Ramadan, Europe is a tinder box.

tbc

Quote:

The most widely reported Ramadan riots so far, which were even covered by the American press, took place in France in 2005. Since the 2005 riots, the French authorities have asked the media not to report about waves of violent unrest in the ZUS - a request which the media seem to have followed. During the 2005 Ramadan riots, several sociologists suggested that polygamy was one of the reasons for the large-scale rioting in Muslim communities among youths who lack a father figure. This theory seemed to have impressed France’s political leaders. Gérard Larcher, then France’s employment minister and currently the president of the French Senate, explained to the Financial Times (Nov. 15, 2005) that multiple marriages among immigrants lead to anti-social behavior, such as criminal activity.  Bernard Accoyer, a leading parliamentarian of France’s governing UMP and currently the president of the French National Assembly (France’s Congress), said that children from large polygamous families have problems integrating into mainstream society. As the Financial Times warned, however, at the time, “Mr Larcher’s comments could further fuel the debate and are likely to outrage Muslim and anti-racism groups.” Apparently, the French government was of the same opinion; it did not follow-up the words of Messrs. Larcher and Accoyer with a clampdown on polygamy. Having multiple wives is illegal under French law, but is allowed under Islamic Sharia law. It is estimated that 30,000 French Muslims have more than one wife and that more than 250,000 people live in polygamous families. The tolerance of polygamous Sharia marriages is not restricted to France. In Norway, the Islamic Cultural Center Norway (ICCN), an immigrant organization subsidized by the Norwegian state, advises Muslims to take several wives because polygamy “is advantageous and ought to be practised where conditions lend themselves to such practice.” In Britain legislators adopt an equally liberal approach towards polygamy for Muslim men, allowing tax breaks for their second, third and fourth wives. Last February, Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, a Conservative Peer of Muslim origin, warned that the growing numbers of Muslim men marrying up to four wives in Britain, is becoming a threat to community cohesion. In the Netherlands, the authorities officially register polygamous marriages by non-Dutch citizens from Morocco, Egypt, Pakistan and other Muslim countries. The Amsterdam municipal authorities admitted that they have even registered Dutch citizens (of Islamic origin) with multiple wives. Belgium, too, recognizes polygamous Islamic marriages. Only last month, the welfare department of the city of Antwerp announced that 45 welfare recipients have two or more spouses. Polygamous immigrants abuse the social security system by collecting state benefits for several wives. In France, residence is only granted to polygamous families if the two wives do not live at the same address, which means that these families claim double social housing, family allowances and other social benefits. The recognition of polygamous marriages of Muslims in countries where polygamy used to be illegal - and still is illegal for non-Muslims - indicates that Sharia law is already accepted in these countries. They have implicitly accepted a system of “legal apartheid” with different legal systems for Muslims and non-Muslims. The decision to avoid arresting Muslims during Ramadan “for reasons of religious sensitivity,” thereby treating Muslims and non-Muslims differently, confirms this existence of a dual legal system. It is difficult to see, however, how such a dual legal system can continue to exist on the same territory. Ultimately, one of the legal systems is likely to prevail. The decision of the Molenbeek mayor that non-Muslim police officers have to respect the Ramadan prescriptions indicates what the next step will be if Europe’s authorities fail to impose the existing laws of the land on Islamic immigrants: the imposition of Sharia law on everyone, non-Muslims as well as Muslims. While Europe’s Muslims hold their Ramadan, this is something worth pondering for Europe’s non-Muslims.

http://www.hudsonny.org/2009/08/eurabian-safari.php

Exactly how it should be!!!

Rubs fingers together in a "Burns-ian" manner  ;D

http://www.xsltblog.com/archives/The-Simpsons-Mr-Burns-Excel.jpg

The green standard of Islam is finally going to conquer Europe!! The dream of Mehmet the Conqueror is finally coming to fruition!!!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Islam_in_Europe.png/300px-Islam_in_Europe.png

hahahha, only, us lovers of democracy don't like that.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2009 at 9:20am:

........Most of them never go to that part of the city. It is probably a sensible decision, because Molenbeek is known to be unsafe for non-Muslims..... .....The Sharia areas of Europe are expanding rapidly across Western Europe. While currently still restricted to what the French officially call the ZUS (zones urbaines sensibles - sensitive urban areas) these areas are growing fast. Even today, eight million of the sixty million inhabitants of France already live in one of the country’s 751 ZUS.

sprint,

You prolly could have titled this thread.....


'Europeans, 'under siege' in Europe'



Europe's future, a once cosmopolitan, and inviting, safe Europe, which 'opened its doors' as a refugee haven for moslems, and others,
.....becomes inherently unsafe for non-moslems?

And such is the 'gratitude' of Europeans moslems, to those Europeans who, in an unsafe world, gave moslems sanctuary?

Yes!           :D

Islam thinks it has or will conquer Europe, but they should not be so sure. The tide is turning, and the average person is fed up.

All you will need is a few good right wing politicians and that is the end of them.

a few harsh words won't send them packing.

laws baning the koran will help

Quote:

Islam thinks it has or will conquer Europe, but they should not be so sure. The tide is turning, and the average person is fed up. All you will need is a few good right wing politicians and that is the end of them.

Well it worked for getting the Jews out of Europe right?? So why not with the Muslims is what you're thinking I guess...

you are guessing wrong.

any peoples who want to fundamentally change any country they move into as immigrants shoudd be deported.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2009 at 8:21am:

a few harsh words won't send them packing. laws baning the koran will help

No, it wouldn't [imo]!


sprint,

IMO, that would be dumb!

I have said it before, we should NOT ban the Koran, or the Hadith, or other ISLAMIC texts.

In fact, imo, they should be required reading in our higher schools, and universities!



IMO, what we should do is ban the practice of ISLAM, in Australia.





Quote:

It should be our governments policy,    * to immediately close or destroy all mosques,    * to immediately deport all imam's [clerics] [stripping them of any Australian citizenship],    * to, upon discovery, within Australia, deport any [and every] person who claims to practice, and follow, the political philosophy called, ISLAM [stripping them of Australian citizenship].

An open letter to Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1247892235/2#2






We don't need to ban, or burn books.

We need to base our choices, on information, and on being informed, on knowledge, of what ISLAM is.
......not on our ignorance, or our prejudice, of what ISLAM is, or what ISLAM may be.


But, what we as right thinking people, desperately do NEED TO DO, is to separate ourselves from this evil called, ISLAM!

The Koran, or the Hadith, or other ISLAMIC texts, are not things which we should fear.

The contents of the Koran, and other ISLAMIC texts, are things which we should expose!!

One Christian nut wants to burn books (throwback to when Christianity was more itself perhaps?) whilst the other doesn't agree, and just wishes to outlaw the practice of certain religions.

It's quite obvious which nutter religion doesn't belong here.

it's also easy  to see which belief has freedom.

how are the chocolate cravings abu ??

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2009 at 2:33pm:

One Christian nut wants to burn books (throwback to when Christianity was more itself perhaps?) whilst the other doesn't agree, and just wishes to outlaw the practice of certain religions. It's quite obvious which nutter religion doesn't belong here.

abu,

You are, such, an out an out raging hypocrite.

You accuse me, of exactly, what ISLAM mandates against, not one other religion, but against ALL other religions....


The Koran...
"If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him;........."
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/003.qmt.html#003.085




An Oz moslem cleric, explains ISLAM's reason for being....

http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200508/r54561_147958.jpg
Australian Islamic leader defends jihad
".....Abu Bakr says he does not accept other religions.
"I am telling you that my religion doesn't tolerate other religion. It doesn't tolerate," he said.
"The only one law which needs to spread, it can be here or anywhere else, is Islam." "
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200508/s1430551.htm




abu,

If i had been born a moslem, and a right thinking human being, and if i then studied what my religion proposed and endorsed,
.....i would be ashamed to call myself a moslem.

But, there is no shaming a good moslem.

Quote:

If i had been born a moslem, and a right thinking human being, and if i then studied what my religion proposed and endorsed, .....i would be ashamed to call myself a moslem.

Nope, you would've seen a balanced view of Islam, instead of just out of context quotes from dhimmiwatch, and therefore you'd know Islam was the truth.

Btw, I like your idea about teaching Islamic texts in schools. Again so long as it's a balanced teaching, I think it'd be a wonderful idea.

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2009 at 6:36pm:

Quote: If i had been born a moslem, and a right thinking human being, and if i then studied what my religion proposed and endorsed, .....i would be ashamed to call myself a moslem. Nope, you would've seen a balanced view of Islam, instead of just out of context quotes from dhimmiwatch, and therefore you'd know Islam was the truth.

ROFLOL!

I fell off my chair!






Quote:

Btw, I like your idea about teaching Islamic texts in schools. Again so long as it's a balanced teaching, I think it'd be a wonderful idea.

So do i abu, so do i !

But in my ideal world, there would be no moslem imams 'leading' the students.

Because the study of these ISLAMIC texts, would seek to be a critical exposition of all aspects of what ISLAM is, and an exposition of what ISLAM truly teaches in its foundation texts.

And for your suggested 'balance' abu, we could, ideally, have classroom discussions of, and comparisons, between; the 'principles' expounded within ISLAM's foundation texts, and say, the principles expounded in a document such as the USA constitution.

How do you like those apples abu?

yadda -  muslims have seriously tried to have any criticism of the koran illegal via the UN I think.

so criticism of islam/the koran is VERY unlikely.

afterall, abu has not told us his version of the muslim fantasy, it is so cloaked in secrecy and ignorance.

Quote:

But in my ideal world, there would be no moslem imams 'leading' the students.

That's right, it'd be a loyal Robert Spencer devotee, misquoting and taking "selected passages" out of context to try and prop up the fantasy history of ravaging hordes of Muslims spreading Islam at the point of a sword, and  dismissing any other passages as merely "Muslim doublespeak".

But, I'd still think it's a good idea. Because I've met ex-missionaries, who've first heard about Islam from their pastor, and even through the biased and misrepresentative portrayal of it, the  truth of Islam managed to seep through and touch their hearts, bringing them to Islam. So even if only a few came to Islam through it, it would be worth it :)

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 4^th, 2009 at 10:20pm:

.....That's right, it'd be a loyal Robert Spencer devotee, misquoting and taking "selected passages" out of context.......I've met ex-missionaries, who've first heard about Islam from their pastor, and even through the biased and misrepresentative portrayal of it, the  truth of Islam managed to seep through and touch their hearts, bringing them to Islam. So even if only a few came to Islam through it, it would be worth it :)

abu,

Everything is in context, ISLAM is an evil, wicked, deceitful, supremacist philosophy.


And ISLAM has presented it case, and its dawa [invitation to ISLAM], to the world.

And all good moslems, in their dawa, give all non-moslems, three options.

The three options which ISLAM offers to non-moslems,
1/ conversion or
2/ subjugation, or
3/ death.

Convert to ISLAM, and worship Mohammed and Allah.

If non-moslems refuse to convert to ISLAM, non-moslems must agree to be subject to ISLAM's laws [i.e. non-moslems must agree to be the slaves of moslems, and acknowledge that moslems are superior].

If non-moslems refuse the previous two options, non-moslems must be 'justly' killed by good moslems, for 'insulting' ISLAM, by their resistance to ISLAM's 'peace', and for their un-ISLAMIC existence.

Its not difficult to understand abu.





The Hadith...

"Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' ...."
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.196


".....The Prophet said, "He who fights that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause." "
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.065



The Koran instructs moslems, that,

"Fighting [against non-moslems] is prescribed for you, and [if] ye dislike it.....Allah knoweth, and ye know not."
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/002.qmt.html#002.216
[i.e.... fighting the non-moslems, to bring Allah's way [Sharia], is an obligation on every moslem.]


"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. "
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/009.qmt.html#009.029iCOLLECTED COMMENTS....


Quote:

I'll highlight what I've written so that maybe you get it this time: "you know there is no possible peace in the Dar Al Harb". For those who don't know, Islam recognizes two parts of the world: Dar Al Islam, the House of Submission, or House of Peace, and Dar Al Harb, the House of War. The only peace for Muslims is the peace of their rule. When they don't rule all we can hope for is truce. They make truce when they realize they aren't strong enough to resume attacking the unsubmissive.

'Eikinkloster'


Wherever in the world there is a moslem community, there is a[other] 'Palestinian' community.
A moslem population in a non-moslem country [Dar Al Harb] will always complain about how the host country treats them, and whine about how it makes them subject to non-moslem laws.
And as the moslem population grows, moslems agitate for their own rules [Sharia], and then their own state.

For those who don't know, there is no possible peace between moslems and Dar Al Harb [a non-moslem community].
For those who don't know, Islam recognizes two parts of the world: Dar Al Islam [the House of Submission, or House of Peace], and Dar Al Harb [the House of War].

The only peace moslems 'recognise', is the peace of their rule [Sharia law].
When they don't rule all we can hope for is truce.
Moslems obey an unspoken truce, when, where, they realize they aren't strong enough to attack the unsubmissive.
All moslems are in 'truce' atm, with their host, non-moslem communities.





Quote:

Once and for all, why don't people see Islam for what it is and always has been, read the Koran, its all there, its simple, be passive if the Kuffer is strong, then as your power base grows, take over and destroy the non belivers, all the people in this country that don't live near places like Blackburn like i do haven't a clue what is going on, and yes, after working here for the last 26 years i too am moving out of the area for this reason. Why? because everybody else i know already has left. Look at history, this all thing as just one outcome...

'SF'
source....
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2409833.ece

The Dawa to non-moslems, the 'invitation' to ISLAM.


Google,
dawa conversion subjugation death
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=dawa+conversion+subjugation+death&btnG=Search&meta=

Quote:

The three options which ISLAM offers to non-moslems, 1/ conversion or 2/ subjugation, or 3/ death.

Hmm... I've heard that somewhere before..

Ahh that's right, the "God of Israel":


Quote:

As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. (which terms?? conversion perhaps??)  If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. (subjugation)  But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. (death) (Deuteronomy 20:10-14)

So if that's the Islamic 'options' for non-Muslims, then they seem to be nothing your God (ie. The "God of Israel") doesn't approve of and even command for his loyal servants.


Quote:

Convert to ISLAM, and worship Mohammed and Allah.

The fact you resort to such open and blatant lies really damages any case you might otherwise have thought you had. Anyone found worshipping Muhammad (pbuh) would be an apostate from Islam, plain and simple, no questions asked. And you know it. You apostle of falsehood.

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 5^th, 2009 at 4:21pm:

Quote: Convert to ISLAM, and worship Mohammed and Allah. The fact you resort to such open and blatant lies really damages any case you might otherwise have thought you had. Anyone found worshipping Muhammad (pbuh) would be an apostate from Islam, plain and simple, no questions asked. And you know it. You apostle of falsehood.

abu,

As much as you may deny it, effectively, every moslem is worshipping Mohammed, not Allah.




Part 053 - Allah and his Aposle Know Best
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uihsSHJxbVc


Part 161 - Muhammad and Allah
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyz5uvJ5dVk
'Allah, AND his apostle'.
Allah was always very mindful of all of Muhammad's needs.
Allah, a severe God to all of humanity, except to Muhammad, to whom Allah gives divine sanction, to all of Muhammad's needs.


Part 163 - Muhammad the Humble
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFcDXs01DIg
'Allah, AND his apostle'.
Allah and Muhammad equal in importance, and it is clear that whatever does not please Muhammad, the same with Allah.
Muhammad, the narcissist.



A full list of all, al Rassooli's "AhmadsQuran3" talks, available on YOUTUBE....
http://www.al-rassooli.com/ahmadsquran3/

abu_rashid wrote on Sep 5^th, 2009 at 4:21pm:

Quote: The three options which ISLAM offers to non-moslems, 1/ conversion or 2/ subjugation, or 3/ death. Hmm... I've heard that somewhere before.. Ahh that's right, the "God of Israel": [quote]As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. (which terms?? conversion perhaps??)  If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. (subjugation)  But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. (death) (Deuteronomy 20:10-14)

So if that's the Islamic 'options' for non-Muslims, then they seem to be nothing your God (ie. The "God of Israel") doesn't approve of and even command for his loyal servants.

[/quote]

abu,

Strange how moslems believe that they are the 'loyal servants' of the "God of Israel", because they claim that the "God of Israel" is also Allah.

WRONG.

Mohammed, in his Koran, justified much of ISLAM's violent doctrine, borrowing the justification for violence, from what the O.T. Hebrews did, commanded by their God, 3,400 years ago now.

And while Mohammed adopted, plagiarised, some of the details of Judaism from the O.T., and adopted, plagiarised, some of the details of the Christian faith from the N.T., to create the 'revealed' Koran, and his very own new religion for the Arab peoples, Mohammed failed to create anything righteous.

In manufacturing ISLAM, all that Mohammed devised [was not a noble religion], but criminal philosophy that very efficiently manages to turn 'blank sheet' human beings, into criminally insane individuals, and wannabee psychotic murderers.

Moslems, serving their Allah, by oppressing and 'righteously' murdering those, who don't believe as they do.




The Hadith...

"Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' ...."
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.196

"A man came to the Prophet and asked, "A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah's Cause?" The Prophet said, "He who fights that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause." "
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.065

"Allah's Apostle said, "Allah welcomes two men with a smile; one of whom kills the other and both of them enter Paradise. One fights in Allah's Cause and gets killed. Later on Allah forgives the 'killer who also get martyred (In Allah's Cause)." "
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.080i

"Allah's Apostle was asked, "What is the best deed?" He replied, "To believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked, "What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, "To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah's Cause." "
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/002.sbt.html#001.002.025



ISLAM, the 'religion' that is about worldly 'booty'.

THE SPOILS OF WAR 'HAVE BEEN MADE LAWFUL',

From the Hadith.....

".....I have been given superiority......; I have been helped by terror (in the hearts of enemies): spoils have been made lawful to me:"
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/muslim/004.smt.html#004.1062


"I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand."
http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/052.sbt.html#004.052.220







Mohammed was a pirate, and a criminal, a murderer, a person who had a bad spirit whispering in his ear, a person who gave himself, to 'the darkness'.



Part 009 - Was Muhammad a Prophet?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFoj7z2ABQE

Part 011 - The Black Stone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UnrVCQFmh0

Part 012 - What is the Ka'ba?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qdxWT_slTs

Part 014 - Quran Against Christians
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZdeNZS1yqk

Part 016 - Quran Against Jews
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_i6r-FYrIc

Part 019 - Quran Against Unbelievers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z5_djbuagc

Part 022 - Quran Against Arabs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hLbI938shA

Part 045A - Jews of Arabia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdyLGXskMTg

Part 045B - Jews of Arabia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35xeq2aOOco

Part 047 - Ancestry of the Arabs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1743mRxr7lo

Part 056 - Made to Order Revelations
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsD3P1Z3Mh0

Quote:

As much as you may deny it, effectively, every moslem is worshipping Mohammed, not Allah.

He is a prophet/messenger of God, so of course following his commands is following the commands of God, since he is speaking the revealed word, but this was the same for all prophets/messengers before him.

It's quite ironic, because you actually do literally worship your prophet/messenger. Instead of just following his commands and worshipping the one true God, you bow down and worship the one who himself bows down and worships the real God.

I guess that's why you try to project your misdeeds and polytheism onto us, since you know somewhere deep down in your heart that worshipping a human figure is wrong.

It's amazing how utterly blinded to the clear reality you are. You openly worship your messenger, but deny it is polytheistic, and instead accuse Muslims of doing what you yourself clearly do, and Muslims most certainly do not do.

For you black is white and white is black, truth is falsehood and falsehood is truth, good is evil and evil is good. You are the apostle of inveracity.

who says mohammad is a prophet?
mohammad does.
anyone disagree, they can say hello to the beheading by rabid muslims who follow mohammad.