A good video about the destruction of the unique nature of Sweden as a great place to visit into a ghetto of angry Islamic immigrants bringing their jihad to the West with our help. Much like London, Paris, Amsterdam, Munich, and pretty soon Sydney.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7f8_1244649850

good clip - no wonder the political right is gaining momentum.

Every normal reasonable Sweden wants this destructive scum far from their fair lands.
the leftards are still bending over to be reamed by islamics.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 14^th, 2009 at 12:48pm:

Every normal reasonable Sweden wants this destructive scum far from their fair lands.

You do know there's only one Sweden don't you?

Part 1

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=043_1227869278

Part 2.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b98_1227869086


Another clip about Sweden, Australia in 10 - 15 years from now. If we don't act.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14^th, 2009 at 1:13pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 12:48pm: Every normal reasonable Sweden wants this destructive scum far from their fair lands. You do know there's only one Sweden don't you?

Do you have sex laxar i en laxask?

tallowood wrote on Jun 14^th, 2009 at 10:10pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 1:13pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 12:48pm: Every normal reasonable Sweden wants this destructive scum far from their fair lands. You do know there's only one Sweden don't you? Do you have sex laxar i en laxask?

Nein, aber ich habe acht Kabeljau in mein rucksack

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14^th, 2009 at 10:19pm:

tallowood wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 10:10pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 1:13pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 12:48pm: Every normal reasonable Sweden wants this destructive scum far from their fair lands. You do know there's only one Sweden don't you? Do you have sex laxar i en laxask? Nein, aber ich habe acht Kabeljau in mein rucksack

That is the answer to your question about only one Sweden?

tallowood wrote on Jun 14^th, 2009 at 10:28pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 10:19pm: tallowood wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 10:10pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 1:13pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 12:48pm: Every normal reasonable Sweden wants this destructive scum far from their fair lands. You do know there's only one Sweden don't you? Do you have sex laxar i en laxask? Nein, aber ich habe acht Kabeljau in mein rucksack That is the answer to your question about only one Sweden?

No, its my answer to your question about six salmon in a salmon box.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14^th, 2009 at 10:40pm:

tallowood wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 10:28pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 10:19pm: tallowood wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 10:10pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 1:13pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 14th, 2009 at 12:48pm: Every normal reasonable Sweden wants this destructive scum far from their fair lands. You do know there's only one Sweden don't you? Do you have sex laxar i en laxask? Nein, aber ich habe acht Kabeljau in mein rucksack That is the answer to your question about only one Sweden? No, its my answer to your question about six salmon in a salmon box.

Therefore it is your answer to your own question.

My answer is of corse better and more realistic.
There should be only one Sweden so muslims can take back their silly caliphate thingo back to Arabia where it came from.

Life at the cherry farm.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 14^th, 2009 at 11:06pm:

Life at the cherry farm.

Islmists hanging on branches with their tongues out. Interesting image indeed. Did it come from your subconscious self?

I am a dual citizen of the United States and Sweden.  Every time I visit Sweden it seems that I see more unfamiliar and unfriendly faces than the last time.  :(

Lately there has been a problem in Scandinavia of Muslims gang-raping good Scandinavian girls.

In the below and shocking image, you see the face of an innocent Swedish girl after she had been brutally gang-raped and attacked by Muslims:

http://www.shelleytherepublican.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/muslim-muzlim-rape-wave-in-sweden-shelleytherepublicancom.jpg

It seems to me that Muslims in Europe are behaving as if they were a conquering army.

Thank god Europeans are starting to wake up.

coral sea - muslims EVERYWHERE think they are a conquering army.

ask abu

http://www.youtube.com/v/m7ErfuGa2SQ

It just looks that the only solution would be exchange of pleasantries.

For the record the social democrat sign at 5:20 says

"In Sweden today there are 450,000 Muslims
We need votes
You need welfare and mosques"

Also, ignore the ideal woman bit.  The Nordic ideal is still the Swedish ideal, and the second woman shown is Swedish (yes, actually Swedish) popstar Carola.  A better example would've been that in 2002 Miss Sweden was a mixed race girl, which I personally found disgusting.  Indeed, Carola is later described as a Swedish artist.  Also, ignore the bit about Adam Tensta.  Regardless of what the media pushes, no one in Sweden seriously believes that you can be Swedish unless you are actually ethnically Swedish (or at the very least of Northern European descent).

The tide is starting to turn.  Sweden's nationalist party, Sverige Demokratarna (Sweden Democrats) are gaining support and will likely be elected to the Riksdag in the next election, which will result in state-financing of the party.  The mainstream political parties have also toughened slightly on immigration, although they are still unacceptably lax.  Sweden's southern neighbor Denmark has shown what is possible, and I think this is the future in Sweden as well.

I thought Miss Sweden was gorgeous.

The mixed race girl who won the Miss Sweden title some years back (I think it was 2002) was attractive, but as she was not Swedish she had no place in the pageant in the first place.

Well she must have been Swedish...  even though she wasn't racially a stereotypical Swede.

And she was gorgeous.

You seem to have a predilection for racial "purity" Coral.  

I'm an ethnic nationalist, and it depends on the country in question.  A mixed race Miss America is fine, we've been biracial for a very long time.

I don't think a mixed race person is or ever can be Swedish, period.  It has less to do with "purity" and much more to do with phenotypes.  Due to Sweden's long relationship with Finland for instance the Swedish population has a fair amount of Uralic and Mongolian admixture, making Swedes genetically less European than, say, Scots.  Swedes look a certain way and that's just how it is.

Like I said...

You seem to have a predilection for racial "purity" Coral.  

Coral Sea wrote on Jun 18^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:

Due to Sweden's long relationship with Finland for instance the Swedish population has a fair amount of Uralic and Mongolian admixture, making Swedes genetically less European than, say, Scots.  Swedes look a certain way and that's just how it is.

Ah, that's what it is...


Swedish Girls - Making British girls look ugly since 1428

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bizman_1/3019500724/sizes/o/

grendel - yes, coral is perceptive and forthright isn't he ?

Well actually I think he/she could be a racist sprint.  Therefore even though showing a fair ability to put a sentence together, he/she holds a totally flawed belief to be true.

Laplanders are Swedish aboriginals, as for real Viking Swedes they immigrated south back in 6-9 century and founded Russ.

Grendel wrote on Jun 18^th, 2009 at 9:09pm:

Well actually I think he/she could be a racist sprint.  Therefore even though showing a fair ability to put a sentence together, he/she holds a totally flawed belief to be true.

Which flawed belief do I hold?

It's an oldie but a goodie:

http://www.youtube.com/v/hpWnpG8yXRk

That to one side, wanting your own country to remain unique and different with its own particular heritage is not racism, its not being a Nazi, it's not being an Islamophobe.

It's being a patriot with loyalty to who WE ARE. Not to what some chardonnay sipping liberal elites tell us we have to be.

I don't respect their religion, and I don't care if they are offended. I don't want any part of 'Islamic Culture' here. Not sharia banking. Not burkas and jihads, and car swarm riots when there are cartoons they don't like.

And the people of any country, have the RIGHT through the democratic process to determine that we do not want that without being lectured from on high by a bunch of self-important leftist traitors.

grendel - "flawed belief" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Or you just fail to see reality, have no pride in yourself and do not understand.

Yes racism is crap sprint.

More comprehension problems Coral?  Is English your first language? Would have thought the quote was self explanatory.  Don't you know what racists believe?

Yes Calanen, I agree with you re Multiculturalism.  Race does not equal culture.

Yes Grendal, maintaining and respecting your culture is very different to racial purity.

It is definitely racist but may be acceptable as long as other racial groups are not discriminated against politically, socially or economically based on their race. Generally though, I think that is a pretty tough ask because I suspect the desire for racial purity is from a belief in some mythical superiority, that belief would too easily permiate into other belief systems such as Justice, status and social acceptance.

I don't believe in nor see any prestige in racial purity anyway although certainly some blood lines are less diluted than others.

I have no problem with a country saying that there are certain cultures or cultural habits that are undesirable and not wanted in that country. I have conditional sympathy for cultural discrimination.

Grendel wrote on Jun 19^th, 2009 at 9:15am:

Yes racism is crap sprint. More comprehension problems Coral?  Is English your first language? Would have thought the quote was self explanatory.  Don't you know what racists believe? Yes Calanen, I agree with you re Multiculturalism.  Race does not equal culture.

Racism can mean any number of things, so no I'm not quite sure.  Rather than suggesting that my grasp of English is poor why don't you go ahead and say what it is you assume me to believe and why said belief is flawed?

Racism means and always has... the belief that a person is inferior or superior based on their race (genetics) alone.  

racism

The belief that some races are inherently superior (physically, intellectually, or culturally) to others and therefore have a right to dominate them.

rac⋅ism
  /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.      a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.

rac·ism   (rā'sĭz'əm)  
n.  

  1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.

Take your pick...  ::)



Any PC or Leftist reinterpretation is not valid.

Oh and I suggest you reread my original post before reinterpreting it due to bad English skills.

Is the definition you provided which I found acceptable, right wing then?

What would be a leftist interpretation?

What is PC?

racism is real.
there is good and bad racism.

some races ARE stronger, some ARE more intelligent.
That's just how it is.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 19^th, 2009 at 10:32am:

racism is real. there is good and bad racism. some races ARE stronger, some ARE more intelligent. That's just how it is.

I hope you are joking sprint. :) There is only the Human Race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism


Quote:

The concept that discrimination can be based on "race" presupposes the existence of "race" itself. However, the US Government's Human Genome Project has announced that the most complete mapping of human DNA to date indicates that there is no distinct genetic basis to racial types.[2] Therefore, "racial characteristics" logically cannot and do not exist either.[citation needed] According to the Human Genome Project, skin color does exist as a matter of science.[2] So, that which is commonly referred to as "racism" could be more scientifically referred to as "skin color-aroused discrimination". The term "skin color aroused discrimination" has the benefit that it is based on verifiable science, is not based on disproved notions of science, and does not perpetuate a false belief in the disproved concept of biological "race".[2]

And because first world countries have almost unlimited access to antibiotics, they start to have severe problems of resistance to its last resource antibiotic vancomycine.
It almost looks that people within first world countries take active part in wiping themselves out.

They just don’t seem to be able any precious unique flake to let go.

Premature babies – save the lot (since they can have offsprings, some problematic genetic traits will be passed on)

1 in 20,000 medical evenements or 1 in 1,000,000 we save all of them. Same thing genetic material is saved and can be passed on.

All this weakens genetic material, irrespectively of our parental feelings and seemingly good intentions.


(Sorry, looks like wrong forum, got carried away with 1-st world thingo)

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 19^th, 2009 at 10:32am:

racism is real. there is good and bad racism. some races ARE stronger, some ARE more intelligent. That's just how it is.

There are physiological differences between race, but it is impermissible to ever do any research on them or name them, because of the Holy Multicultism. This infallible law of Multiculti says, that every race is exactly the same no matter what the evidence to the contrary.

Although we know, for a fact, that certain races have more eye defects than others. We know that certain races react poorly to certain drugs, and that certain races are the only races that get particular genetic conditions.

If we know these things, its likely that science would show that there would be other differences between the races, on average.

But, the Holy Multiculti overrides all facts and evidence, and provides all answers. All races are the same, physically, mentally, physiologically, biologically - the Holy Multiculti has spoken and cannot be challenged.  

No loc the ones I posted are ENGLISH

If you are looking for a Leftist PC one you'd probably have to look in the Macquarrie Dictionary where they strain the English language to breaking point and muddle definitions.

If you want to debate the existence of RACE...  then start another topic only to happy to beat you about the head with some facts.

The politically Left scientists that came up with that dismissed race and used fallacious arguments ignoring their own findings to do so.

My last word on it here...  start another topic.

Quote:

There is only the Human Race.

::)

Do you need to be informed of the difference between a "species" and a "race"?

Grendel wrote on Jun 19^th, 2009 at 10:18am:

Racism means and always has... the belief that a person is inferior or superior based on their race (genetics) alone.

A person can certainly be inferior because of his personal genetics, but given the variation within racial groups obviously an individual cannot be deemed superior or inferior merely because of his race.

I'm not sure why you came to discuss racial superiority, or lack thereof, when the original issue I raised was limited to ethnic aesthetics.


locutius wrote on Jun 19^th, 2009 at 11:48am:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 19th, 2009 at 10:32am: racism is real. there is good and bad racism. some races ARE stronger, some ARE more intelligent. That's just how it is. I hope you are joking sprint. :) There is only the Human Race. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism Quote: The concept that discrimination can be based on "race" presupposes the existence of "race" itself. However, the US Government's Human Genome Project has announced that the most complete mapping of human DNA to date indicates that there is no distinct genetic basis to racial types.[2] Therefore, "racial characteristics" logically cannot and do not exist either.[citation needed] According to the Human Genome Project, skin color does exist as a matter of science.[2] So, that which is commonly referred to as "racism" could be more scientifically referred to as "skin color-aroused discrimination". The term "skin color aroused discrimination" has the benefit that it is based on verifiable science, is not based on disproved notions of science, and does not perpetuate a false belief in the disproved concept of biological "race".[2]

You've just rehashed, as did the US government, the Lewontin Fallacy.

A proper phylogenetic analysis of the human DNA shows continuous clinal variation with distinct racial clustering.  Most population geneticists use euphemisms like "human populations" or "genetic clusters" now in order to avoid having their research sabotaged by leftist wackos.  There are at least five races (the traditional continental-scale races of white, black, yellow, red, and capoid) and possibly ten (L.L. Cavalli-Sfroza's thesis).

I'm also baffled as to how the race-deniers all seem to be able to reduce race to nothing other than skin color, as if that's the only racial difference.  It's not even the only obvious racial difference.  Color the face of a black man white tell me if looks like us--he doesn't.

Coral Sea wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 2:35am:

I'm also baffled as to how the race-deniers all seem to be able to reduce race to nothing other than skin color, as if that's the only racial difference.  It's not even the only obvious racial difference.  Color the face of a black man white tell me if looks like us--he doesn't.

Not the only obvious difference, but can you recognise facial features from 50 metres?

Quote:

I'm also baffled as to how the race-deniers all seem to be able to reduce race to nothing other than skin color, as if that's the only racial difference.  It's not even the only obvious racial difference.  Color the face of a black man white tell me if looks like us--he doesn't.

http://i39.tinypic.com/vy42ef.jpg

Gee thanks...  those photos are staples of people denying race.  Always love looking at them.  Not.

Race as has been pointed out is much more than skin colour.

But interesting to note how the "etho-aestheticist"  CoralS dodges the question.  Is that the new word for racist?

As for the pedantry re the genetics word (I knew I should have left it out) come on fess up.

Are some races in your opinion inferior to others?

Inferior in what respects?  Certainly races can be said to superior or inferior to other races in certain traits, but a white supremacist will quickly find himself with skin cancer and malaria in tropical Africa.

Try not to deflect by answering a question with a question.

Mine was rather specific.
You keep dodging CS...  what's up?
Pedantry got your tongue?

Are some races in your opinion inferior to others?

No, all races evolved to suit their unique conditions.  To proclaim one race superior to another would require an ordinal ranking of all human traits which have racial variation.

Quote:

Gee thanks...  those photos are staples of people denying race.

What the hell are you talking about? I didn't deny race at all. Race is certainly a real biological phenomenon, and it (as you said) runs far deeper than skin color. I posted those photos to corroborate these points. The fact that the "black" people in them don't look anything like white people, and this is when their skin color has been changed to match Caucasians, was my main point. I've never seen a white person that looks anything like the people in those photos. Frankly I don't want to.

The "SKIN DEEP" comment at the top of that post was facetious. Have you read any of my other posts on this forum? I'm no race denier. I'll be the first person here to take the piss out of anybody who tries that crap.

hello

While race is certainly more than skin colour, I bet the subjects of those photos, were they in fact to lose their their 'blackness', would find life in certain parts of the world just got a whole lot easier. Racists everywhere must make an immediate assessment of status based on what they can see from 50 metres. Skin colour, for a racist, must colour everything else.

Merc...
Quote:

What the hell are you talking about? I didn't deny race at all.

I never said you did.
There are 3 primary races; Mongoloid, Causcasoid and Negroid.
But like I said  staples of the non-race crowd...  things I have seen many times b4 in arguments.

helian...  I'd expect they'd be marginalised even further... not only from racists of the non-black variety but also within black communities.

yawn CS...

Still cant get it up i see..

You keep dodging CS...  what's up?
Pedantry got your tongue?

Are some races in your opinion inferior to others?

I know all the arguments i want to know what you believe.

Grendel wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 1:31pm:

helian...  I'd expect they'd be marginalised even further... not only from racists of the non-black variety but also within black communities.

Quite possibly in some contexts, less likely though within a white society when applying for a job or walking down a street at night or browsing through a supermarket.

Wanna bet?

Grendel wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 3:17pm:

Wanna bet?

OK.

I still don't understand what Grendel is asking. Coral Sea clearly made a response to Grendel's very question in his last post.

I've made it very clear what I want merc.
CS keeps dancing around it.

Quote:

To proclaim one race superior to another would require an ordinal ranking of all human traits which have racial variation.

I could assume that this means yes i am a racist.  Just can't be bothered to list all the traits on which I base that belief.

My questions has always been...

Are some races in your opinion inferior to others?

imho, some races are inferior to others in some attributes.
Some races are more prone to specific diseases than others.
Some races are taller than others.
Some races live longer than others.
Some races are in jail more than others.

The races are different.

None of which answers the question sprint

Easel if you want to say something, just say it.

Also you picked the wrong day, it's the weekend. Even Dept of Defence has most of its staff working Mon to Fri.

Still want to meet him?


Calanen wrote on May 12^th, 2009 at 11:22pm:

I actually probably would meet with ... easel ... - they are reasonable people.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 10:34pm:

Still want to meet him? Calanen wrote on May 12th, 2009 at 11:22pm: I actually probably would meet with ... easel ... - they are reasonable people.

Hey so he didn't take his anti-psychotic meds today! It happens....

Calanen wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 10:39pm:

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 20th, 2009 at 10:34pm: Still want to meet him? Calanen wrote on May 12th, 2009 at 11:22pm: I actually probably would meet with ... easel ... - they are reasonable people. Hey so he didn't take his anti-psychotic meds today! It happens....

To whom?

Grendel wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 5:42pm:

I've made it very clear what I want merc. CS keeps dancing around it. Quote: To proclaim one race superior to another would require an ordinal ranking of all human traits which have racial variation. I could assume that this means yes i am a racist.  Just can't be bothered to list all the traits on which I base that belief. My questions has always been... Are some races in your opinion inferior to others?

Grendel, what exactly is the point of your little exercise here?  Precisely as I have said and as sprintcyclist is reinforced, I am not prepared to rank the human races precisely because we all have different advantages and disadvantages.  Even aborigines have dramatically superior visual memory to any other race, which is one reason they are magnificent trackers.  Are you hoping me to call this race or the other stupid so you can get some satisfaction by labeling me a racist?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 20^th, 2009 at 10:40pm:

Calanen wrote on Jun 20th, 2009 at 10:39pm: NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 20th, 2009 at 10:34pm: Still want to meet him? Calanen wrote on May 12th, 2009 at 11:22pm: I actually probably would meet with ... easel ... - they are reasonable people. . Hey so he didn't take his anti-psychotic meds today! It happens.... To whom?

To him.

Quote:

Grendel, what exactly is the point of your little exercise here?  Precisely as I have said and as sprintcyclist is reinforced, I am not prepared to rank the human races precisely because we all have different advantages and disadvantages.  Even aborigines have dramatically superior visual memory to any other race, which is one reason they are magnificent trackers.  Are you hoping me to call this race or the other stupid so you can get some satisfaction by labeling me a racist?

I just want you for once to give an answer to the question...  yes or no.
Do you believe some races are inferior or superior to others?

You've dodged it long enough.
One can only suspect why.

I'm hoping you'll be honest but as you've been so disingenuous about it so far I'm not expecting it.

Oh and while you're at it you can explain the beliefs of an ethno-aesthetist?  That oughta be good too.  You should know that because that is what you say you are.

Hello.

My belief is also, that on average, there are racial characteristics that distinguish one race from another. Whether they are 'better' or not is a matter of opinion, and depends on the task. Would I prefer a black guy on my basketball team instead of a white guy without knowing anything else about them? Probably.

Calanen wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2009 at 2:07pm:

Would I prefer a black guy on my basketball team instead of a white guy without knowing anything else about them? Probably.

Or probably not...

http://content9.flixster.com/photo/11/13/93/11139383_gal.jpg

Grendel wrote on Jun 21^st, 2009 at 10:43am:

I just want you for once to give an answer to the question...  yes or no. Do you believe some races are inferior or superior to others?

In everything? Of course not. Nobody believes that. In some things? Yes. Everybody believes that.

I think you might mean morally, that is, in their exercise of individual freedom.

But that is a cultural criterion, not a biological one, like race. And yes, some cultures are superior in teachng indviduals in the exercise of ther freedom because some cultures value it more than others. THey are more moral cultures. And such superior cultures are better than the ones that teach how to survive oppression and unfreedom.

Yeah I was going to get Garry Coleman to play on my basketball team.

Have another donut lard-oh.

Also, I'm going away to Europe for the summer. Think of all the pastries you could eat there if you could afford it!

So toodles...I'll be sure to raise a glass of Moet on the Riveria to fat bastards with not enough money to holiday in Europe, just for you.

Yes add that to your obsession files...HE WENT TO EUROPE!!! WE"LL GO THROUGH ALL THE PASSPORTS OF EVERYONE THAT WENT TO EUROPE!!! BY GOD WE'LL FIND HIM!!! GIMME MORE CHICKEN NUGGETS TO EAT!!!

Calanen wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2009 at 8:47pm:

Yeah I was going to get Garry Coleman to play on my basketball team. Have another donut lard-oh. Also, I'm going away to Europe for the summer. Think of all the pastries you could eat there if you could afford it! So toodles...I'll be sure to raise a glass of Moet on the Riveria to fat bastards with not enough money to holiday in Europe, just for you. Yes add that to your obsession files...HE WENT TO EUROPE!!! WE"LL GO THROUGH ALL THE PASSPORTS OF EVERYONE THAT WENT TO EUROPE!!! BY GOD WE'LL FIND HIM!!! GIMME MORE CHICKEN NUGGETS TO EAT!!!

European sex tour this year.... is it? Guess you can't go back to Thailand too soon.

See ya shortarse.

Oh and... forget to write.

I was waiting for cSea to finally get enough gumption to answer my question Soren. Not You...  But he/she seems to have disappeared.


Quote:

In everything? Of course not. Nobody believes that. In some things? Yes. Everybody believes that does.

Actually racists do believe some races are inferior.  In some cases just there skin colour makes them inferior in every way.  Skin colour is kind of an ethno-aesthetic you know.


Quote:

I think you might mean morally, that is, in their exercise of individual freedom.

You might think wrong then.

I'm talking about race and unlike some others here I don't confuse it with culture.

Quote:

You might think wrong then. I'm talking about race and unlike some others here I don't confuse it with culture.

The problem with Sweden is not about race. The problem in Australia is not about race. I have convoes with Christian Arabs, Hindus, Sikhs all the time about the problems of Islam. And it's Islam that is the problem, not the race of the practitioner. That treasonous slime Abu Rashid is a whitie. He's worse though, because like the English that joined the SS - treason is a far worse crime than just being the enemy.

A Coptic cab driver said that if he picks up muslims in his cab, they pull down the pictures of Mary he has and rip them up, tears his cross down. He says, when he goes to Lakemba or a muslim area, he hides all of his Christian paraphenalia. Isn't that sad...but not unexpected. I've also been talking to Hindus, Sikhs, Christian cab drivers who are being harassed and bullied by muslims about their religion at the airport, and shouted at to convert, their religion is false, etc.

This is why it has to be repeated constantly that Islam is a religion of peace - otherwise the concept would not occur to anyone.

You may have all seen this already
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfn1qHKXoWk

Good grief calanen...  why did you quote me?
I was talking to Soren (who quoted me) and prior to that waiting for CS.

Do I have to start naming everyone in every post again?

Chill out man - I think I was supporting your point not contradicting it.

Persecution complex much?

Actually you didn't help at all.  You went off in another direction.
I want an answer from CS not other people commenting or going off on tangents or other directions.  I was talking about race. Not Sweden or culture.

Grendel wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2009 at 9:25am:

Actually you didn't help at all.  You went off in another direction. I want an answer from CS not other people commenting or going off on tangents or other directions.  I was talking about race. Not Sweden or culture.

No-one is going to directly answer your question Grendel - unless it's DonaldTrump or AN - Coral Sea is obviously being PC and there's nothing wrong with that. I thought he gave a good answer.

Besides - those who would go with the theory that Africans have a lower IQ than any other race on earth would be in the minority.

Grendel wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2009 at 9:25am:

Actually you didn't help at all.  You went off in another direction. I want an answer from CS not other people commenting or going off on tangents or other directions.  I was talking about race. Not Sweden or culture.

Well sometimes we don't get what we want. The world's an imperfect place.

Give your Teddy a hug, it will ease the pain.

I wouldn't want me as an enemy you seem to have enough as it is.
Save the crap for real enemies.
Or I might just shove my teddy up your ar5e

Grendel wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2009 at 10:59am:

I wouldn't want me as an enemy you seem to have enough as it is. Save the crap for real enemies. Or I might just shove my teddy up your ar5e

Lighten up Francis.

http://www.youtube.com/v/LrllCZw8jiM

As the black guy in the vid clip said 'OOO-oooooh..'

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jun 19^th, 2009 at 10:32am:

racism is real. there is good and bad racism. some races ARE stronger, some ARE more intelligent. That's just how it is.

sprint, sprint!

Tut, tut,  .....you are a Christian.

I would have rather said, that some cultures are detestable, while some other cultures promote commendable, and just, human values.

I think i have said elsewhere on OzPol that i believe that what we believe, determines how we behave.
....and the culture we are born into, must have some influence upon our beliefs, and consequently our life 'values'.

But in the end, we as individuals, choose to accept, or to reject, the mores, and 'values' of our 'parent' culture.

And in the end, we as individuals, choose for ourselves what we will accept, as right or wrong, good or evil.isprint, God's word says that we [mankind] are all one flesh [one blood],

Acts 17:26
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;







I believe that all mankind are equal, before God.

And God commends us, to not oppress the stranger [the foreigner among us].

"Churches oppose Islamic school"
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1240363717/136#136



Quote:

Exodus 22:21 Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. Exodus 23:9 Also thou shalt not oppress a stranger: for ye know the heart of a stranger, seeing ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. Leviticus 19:33 And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. 34  But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God. Deuteronomy 10:17 For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward: 18  He doth execute the judgment of the fatherless and widow, and loveth the stranger, in giving him food and raiment. 19  Love ye therefore the stranger: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. Matthew 22:36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? 37  Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38  This is the first and great commandment. 39  And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. I would suggest that many of those examples of extreme violence in the OT, were directed against those deemed to be WICKED [by the God of Israel] and against those ppl's who were occupying the 'promised land' - which God [said he had] given to the Children of Israel.

Calanen wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2009 at 9:10pm:

… A Coptic cab driver said that if he picks up muslims in his cab, they pull down the pictures of Mary he has and rip them up, tears his cross down. He says, when he goes to Lakemba or a muslim area, he hides all of his Christian paraphenalia. Isn't that sad...but not unexpected. I've also been talking to Hindus, Sikhs, Christian cab drivers who are being harassed and bullied by muslims about their religion at the airport, and shouted at to convert, their religion is false, etc.

I think that every instance of religious bullying and any abuse should be reported.

Otherwise government officials can play silly buggers and say that they know nothing and that everything is according to multicultural official line.

(Have a nice holiday, hope you will have access to computer and time to post)

Happy wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2009 at 1:41pm:

Calanen wrote on Jun 22nd, 2009 at 9:10pm: … A Coptic cab driver said that if he picks up muslims in his cab, they pull down the pictures of Mary he has and rip them up, tears his cross down. He says, when he goes to Lakemba or a muslim area, he hides all of his Christian paraphenalia. Isn't that sad...but not unexpected. I've also been talking to Hindus, Sikhs, Christian cab drivers who are being harassed and bullied by muslims about their religion at the airport, and shouted at to convert, their religion is false, etc. I think that every instance of religious bullying and any abuse should be reported. Otherwise government officials can play silly buggers and say that they know nothing and that everything is according to multicultural official line. (Have a nice holiday, hope you will have access to computer and time to post)

Heh - not going *quite* yet. 15 July to 30 July.

have a good holiday calanen.

mantra wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2009 at 10:24am:

Grendel wrote on Jun 23rd, 2009 at 9:25am: Actually you didn't help at all.  You went off in another direction. I want an answer from CS not other people commenting or going off on tangents or other directions.  I was talking about race. Not Sweden or culture. No-one is going to directly answer your question Grendel - unless it's DonaldTrump or AN - Coral Sea is obviously being PC and there's nothing wrong with that. I thought he gave a good answer. Besides - those who would go with the theory that Africans have a lower IQ than any other race on earth would be in the minority.

I am not being PC, I am stating my opinion that the races cannot be ranked.

And I do go with the theory that Africans have a lower IQ than most other races (Aborigines and Capoids are lower), but this does not make them inferior overall because they are superior in other traits.

Coral Sea wrote on Jun 30^th, 2009 at 2:01pm:

I am not being PC, I am stating my opinion that the races cannot be ranked. And I do go with the theory that Africans have a lower IQ than most other races (Aborigines and Capoids are lower), but this does not make them inferior overall because they are superior in other traits.

Yes, of course...

And their superior skill would be for you... dancing and playing dee bongos, perhaps?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 30^th, 2009 at 2:16pm:

Coral Sea wrote on Jun 30th, 2009 at 2:01pm: I am not being PC, I am stating my opinion that the races cannot be ranked. And I do go with the theory that Africans have a lower IQ than most other races (Aborigines and Capoids are lower), but this does not make them inferior overall because they are superior in other traits. Yes, of course... And their superior skill would be for you... dancing and playing dee bongos, perhaps?

Dancing is an important form of expression in all human cultures, so I'm not sure why you'd denigrate it as such.

Regardless, blacks mature faster, have better sensory perception, lighter calves that allow for faster running and higher jumping, and higher levels of testosterone which allow for easier building of lean body mass.  And yes, many commentators have noted some sort of black affinity for rhythm, although a mechanism to explain this has not been identified blacks have certainly been impressive with improvisational forms of music (e.g. jazz).

The reduction of the whole kaleidoscope of human experience to the trait of intelligence is silly.  In fact, relatively little intelligence is necessary for most of our tasks or to form even a lasting society.  Is Einstein greater than Michael Jordan?  I don't think so--they each excelled magnificently in completely different realms.

Coral Sea wrote on Jun 30^th, 2009 at 2:22pm:

The reduction of the whole kaleidoscope of human experience to the trait of intelligence is silly.

And yet it was the one you chose.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 30^th, 2009 at 2:36pm:

Coral Sea wrote on Jun 30th, 2009 at 2:22pm: The reduction of the whole kaleidoscope of human experience to the trait of intelligence is silly. And yet it was the one you chose.

No, it is the one Mantra chose.