Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> General Board >> Candidates for negative immigration
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1237264117

Message started by sprintcyclist on Mar 17th, 2009 at 2:28pm

Title: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by sprintcyclist on Mar 17th, 2009 at 2:28pm

Pretending that Aussie will negatively immigrate some people of races/ethnics/looks/beliefs who do you think should be on the short list ??

Under what criteria should people be permitted to stay within our fair shores ??

(ps - this is a fun thread)

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by skippy on Mar 17th, 2009 at 2:51pm
Kiwi's ::)

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by sprintcyclist on Mar 17th, 2009 at 2:57pm

hahaha

and bloggers with red devils as their avatar !!!!!!!

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by Aussie Nationalist on Mar 17th, 2009 at 3:16pm
Black Africans and Muslims of all races.

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by sprintcyclist on Mar 17th, 2009 at 3:53pm

What about people with a lazy eye ?
They freak me out those people.

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by djrbfm on Mar 17th, 2009 at 4:41pm
hello,
you guys should stop arguing about this.
it's the best news we've had in a long time.
i do not want australia to be a dumping ground for other country's rejects.
the suburbs around mine, and including mine, were once at least B grade,if not higher, but now most are down to c grade or lower.
have any of you been on a west bound train from central lately.
well, i have and it's not a pretty sight.
DR9.

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by Kytro on Mar 17th, 2009 at 5:21pm
Those who advocate irrational policies  8-)

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by Aussie Nationalist on Mar 17th, 2009 at 6:18pm

djrbfm wrote on Mar 17th, 2009 at 4:41pm:
have any of you been on a west bound train from central lately.
well, i have and it's not a pretty sight.
DR9.


I should know mate i drive the fvckers. :P

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by djrbfm on Mar 18th, 2009 at 9:13pm
hi,
seems to me that my observations are somewhat accurate then.
actually, i can remember, and not that long ago, when riding a train in sydney was a bit of fun(i've never been a 9to5'er.).
now i'm trying to find one where i can avoid these ppl.
they might like it, but then they are probably used to the smells.......
about a week ago, i boarded a west bound at ~8:30pm, central, and i thought i heard "welcome to the pakistani express, plenty of room on the roof".

DR9. ; ::)

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by Calanen on Mar 18th, 2009 at 9:14pm

DILLIGAF wrote on Mar 17th, 2009 at 3:16pm:
Black Africans and Muslims of all races.


Just muslims. With the exception of Turks, Tartars and Ahmidaya's - if they take a polygraph confirming that they will not support jihad against Australia.

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by Aussie Skinhead on Mar 18th, 2009 at 10:33pm
Degenerates and social undesirables. They are bad for society and decay our standards and morals. They have no place in a modern civilized Anglo-Australian society. Certain types of people who don't fit in must be included for the sake of the preservation of our race, ethnicity and culture. Mentally unfit people should be sterilized  so they can't pass on their genetic crime to future generations.

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by Kytro on Mar 20th, 2009 at 9:15am

Calanen wrote on Mar 18th, 2009 at 9:14pm:
Just muslims. With the exception of Turks, Tartars and Ahmidaya's - if they take a polygraph confirming that they will not support jihad against Australia.


You do realise polygraphs are really unreliable don't you?    

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by Calanen on Mar 21st, 2009 at 7:07am

Kytro wrote on Mar 20th, 2009 at 9:15am:

Calanen wrote on Mar 18th, 2009 at 9:14pm:
Just muslims. With the exception of Turks, Tartars and Ahmidaya's - if they take a polygraph confirming that they will not support jihad against Australia.


You do realise polygraphs are really unreliable don't you?    


No, they are not. They are extremely accurate.

The US government regularly administers polygraphs to personnel in trusted positions to ensure their loyalty. But the operators know what they are doing.

In the past, any old untrained quack would buy a polygraph and start administering it, when they wouldnt have the slightest idea what they were doing. That was what gave polygraphs an undeserved bad name. It's like saying that planes are unreliable because people who haven't learnt to fly them make them crash.

It's only the operators that are unreliable.

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by Kytro on Apr 16th, 2009 at 6:13pm

Calanen wrote on Mar 21st, 2009 at 7:07am:
No, they are not. They are extremely accurate.

The US government regularly administers polygraphs to personnel in trusted positions to ensure their loyalty. But the operators know what they are doing.

In the past, any old untrained quack would buy a polygraph and start administering it, when they wouldnt have the slightest idea what they were doing. That was what gave polygraphs an undeserved bad name. It's like saying that planes are unreliable because people who haven't learnt to fly them make them crash.

It's only the operators that are unreliable.


I am afraid not.  There is a reason they cannot be used as evidence in court.  In fact there is very little scientific evidence that they work.

Something which is more promising is fMRI

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by DARWIN on Apr 17th, 2009 at 12:13pm
We should send the abos back to where they came from!

wherever that was


:)

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by A. G. on Apr 17th, 2009 at 1:57pm
---

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by mozzaok on Apr 17th, 2009 at 4:44pm

Darwin wrote on Apr 17th, 2009 at 12:13pm:
We should send the abos back to where they came from!

wherever that was


:)


I love subtlety Darwin, but it would be fair to assume that at least some would have let that salient point fly straight through to the keeper.

I have told the story before, but will do so again, because it reinforces the point you make.
My nan came from scotland as a teen, and when she was in her 60's, had a lady try and put her down as a 'New Australian', to which said, "my you are the palest aboriginal I have ever met"

It is especially worrying when people who are only second or third generation cannot see that they are seeking to treat people in a way, which they would not like to see their own families subjected to, perhaps they did not learn from the tales their antecedents passed on to them, of what it is like to be unfairly persecuted.

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by DARWIN on Apr 17th, 2009 at 6:08pm
Yawn! Thought this was supposed to be a fun thread?

Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by mozzaok on Apr 17th, 2009 at 6:18pm
Well chuck in some jokes Darwin, everyone enjoys a good joke.

Just recently a few posters said how much they enjoy fart jokes, so here is an old one, that every one may not have heard.

The teacher walks into the room and says... "OK class today's word is DEFINITELY, can anyone use the word in a sentence."

Little Susie stands up and say "The sky is DEFINITELY blue."

The teacher says; "Not necessarily Susie, it can be blue, gray, or black, but nice try."

Little Johnny is in the back of the room and is waving his hands back and forth.

The teacher says " Yes Johnny, What is it?"

Johnny says " I have a question."

OK lets hear it, says the teacher.

Johnny says "Do Farts have lumps?"

The teacher says, "Well no they don't."

Little Johnny says "Well then I DEFINITELY just pooped my pants!!!"


Title: Re: Candidates for negative immigration
Post by soren on Apr 17th, 2009 at 9:36pm

mozzaok wrote on Apr 17th, 2009 at 4:44pm:
It is especially worrying when people who are only second or third generation cannot see that they are seeking to treat people in a way, which they would not like to see their own families subjected to, perhaps they did not learn from the tales their antecedents passed on to them, of what it is like to be unfairly persecuted.



And there shall, in that time, be rumours of things going astray, erm, and there shall be a great confusion as to where things really are, and nobody will really know where lieth those little things wi-- with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment. At this time, a friend shall lose his friend's hammer and the young shall not know where lieth the things possessed by their fathers that their fathers put there only just the night before, about eight o'clock. Yea, it is written in the book of Cyril that, in that time, shall the third one...

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.