Did they show the act on islamic tv, like they did it with Nick Berg?

They did a reinactment on lifetime channel for their new movie.

It involved a beautiful, flawless woman getting beheaded by some drunken male with zits all over his face.

All the other men in the movie were depicted as just completely oblivious or doormats, and ultimately come running to their mary sue main character's aid but it is too late. The dreaded alpha male has struck again! When will men learn that women are the surpirior gender?!

You can watch it again on Lifetime channel this weekend right after the color purple and sister act.

That's mild compared with the woman in NSW who worked in an abbatoir.  She stabbed her de facto 37 times with a butcher's knife, skinned him, hung his hide from a meat hook in her lounge room to cure and then cooked his body parts for meals for his children.

She makes Muzzammil Hassan look civilised in comparison.

mantra wrote on Feb 18^th, 2009 at 8:11am:

That's mild compared with the woman in NSW who worked in an abbatoir.  She stabbed her de facto 37 times with a butcher's knife, skinned him, hung his hide from a meat hook in her lounge room to cure and then cooked his body parts for meals for his children. She makes Muzzammil Hassan look civilised in comparison.

Hey, if you're going to murder someone. You might as well make use out of the corpse.

I'd rather give the corpse to some necrophyliac to have his way with. Seeing as I definitely would not ingest anything involving my enemies..

But atleast that woman was thinking with portals!

"Any word yet on why he killed her? Maybe she cheated on him? Or apostacised? " (c) freediver

There are rumours that it was an accident. Hassan only was trying his new battery operated tooth brush.

Whoosh, there goes another point, flying straight over mantra's head.

Do you believe there is any cultural imperative for stabbing someone 37 times, and then feeding the corpse to his children, Mantra?

mozzaok wrote on Feb 19^th, 2009 at 12:41am:

Whoosh, there goes another point, flying straight over mantra's head. Do you believe there is any cultural imperative for stabbing someone 37 times, and then feeding the corpse to his children, Mantra?

Must be feminist movement. They did very similar things to Orpheus time ago.
However it is strange that the feminists don't bleed their harts for the poor sisters who are victims of "honour" killings in predominantly muslim countries like Jordan.


Quote:

Kifaya, a Jordanian girl of 12, was intelligent and full of curiosity. But when she returned home one evening from a walk in the neighbourhood with some friends, she was confronted by her enraged father. Shouting that she had dishonoured the entire family, her father proceeded to beat Kifaya with sticks and iron chains until she was dead. He told police he killed his only daughter because she went for walks without his permission. About the same time, Hanan, 34, was shot dead by her brother for the "crime" of marrying a Christian. Her brother left her body in the street and smoked a cigarette while he waited for the police to arrive. Every year between 25 and 50 women and girls are the victims of "honour" killings in Jordan.

United Nations Population Fund

Quote:

Do you believe there is any cultural imperative for stabbing someone 37 times, and then feeding the corpse to his children, Mantra?

Of course not, only the culture of Muslims affect their behaviour. Westerners only do such things if they're mentally deranged. Muslims aren't mentally deranged though, it's just their culture.

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 19^th, 2009 at 7:52pm:

Quote: Do you believe there is any cultural imperative for stabbing someone 37 times, and then feeding the corpse to his children, Mantra? Of course not, only the culture of Muslims affect their behaviour. Westerners only do such things if they're mentally deranged. Muslims aren't mentally deranged though, it's just their culture.

People who take their religion so seriously as to kill in its name are deranged. This is not confined to islam but is certainly much more prominet among muslims nowadays then among western secularists or even Christian fundamentalist and, dare I mention them, joos.

There are an awful lot of muslims ready to kill, or at the very least threaten to kill, in the name of Islam.


The point - there are a lot of insane islamists who are insane because they are islamists. Every suicide bomber, head hacker, Benbrinka and Atta, every placard carrying, 'Allahu Akbar' shouting demonstrator on the streets of london, paris, Sydney belongs to this category. They are all deranged by way of a personal choice.

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 19^th, 2009 at 7:52pm:

Quote: Do you believe there is any cultural imperative for stabbing someone 37 times, and then feeding the corpse to his children, Mantra? Of course not, only the culture of Muslims affect their behaviour. Westerners only do such things if they're mentally deranged. Muslims aren't mentally deranged though, it's just their culture.

The UN report says that "The report says that "honour" killings tend to be more prevalent in, but are not limited to, countries with a majority Muslim population."

How do you explain the prevalence of "honour" killings in muslim countries?

Quote:

How do you explain the prevalence of "honour" killings in muslim countries?

I know this one. It's because the 'evil west' interfered and dismantled their Caliphate. If they had a Caliphate, they could kill apostates and adulterers in a nice orderly fashiopn, with the correct sized stones. But because of the 'evil wests' interference, they have to resort to these disorganised 'honour killings'.

Quote:

How do you explain the prevalence of "honour" killings in muslim countries?

What on earth do 'honour' killings have to do with this case??

If a Western man kills his wife cos she is going to divorce him, is that an 'honour' killing? Or is it only if a Muslim does it?

These claims are truly ridiculous.

A man killed his wife in a domestic dispute end of story (for the normal sane people), but for the Islamophobes noooo it's all about Islam isn't it. Every single thing any Muslim ever does is always about Islam isn't it?

You people aren't even worth debating with, really,

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 20^th, 2009 at 4:10am:

Quote: How do you explain the prevalence of "honour" killings in muslim countries? What on earth do 'honour' killings have to do with this case?? If a Western man kills his wife cos she is going to divorce him, is that an 'honour' killing? Or is it only if a Muslim does it? These claims are truly ridiculous. A man killed his wife in a domestic dispute end of story (for the normal sane people), but for the Islamophobes noooo it's all about Islam isn't it. Every single thing any Muslim ever does is always about Islam isn't it? You people aren't even worth debating with, really,

Don’t be a bigot, abu. According to Widney Brown, advocacy director for Human Rights Watch "the practice goes across cultures and across religions".

While precise figures do not exist for the perpetrators' cultural backgrounds, Diana Nammi of the UK's Iranian and Kurdish Women's Rights Organisation have said:"about two-thirds are Muslim. Yet they can also be Hindu, Sikh and even eastern European."

Perhaps the prevalence of "honour" killing in muslim communities can be explained by origins of islam in Arabic culture.

Quote:

Sharif Kanaana, professor of anthropology at Birzeit University states that honor killing is: A complicated issue that cuts deep into the history of Arab society. .. What the men of the family, clan, or tribe seek control of in a patrilineal society is reproductive power. Women for the tribe were considered a factory for making men. The honour killing is not a means to control sexual power or behavior. What's behind it is the issue of fertility, or reproductive power.

Here is na exelent article about the phenomenon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honor_killing

BTW, "honour" killing in Pakistan goes under the name Karo Kari, which sounds something between hara kiri and cursed curry.

Honour killing has nothing to do with Islam, even if 100% of cases were by Muslims.

And it likewise has nothing to do with this issue we're discussing.

You're simply throwing it in for good measure.

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 20^th, 2009 at 8:13am:

Honour killing has nothing to do with Islam, even if 100% of cases were by Muslims. And it likewise has nothing to do with this issue we're discussing. You're simply throwing it in for good measure.

But the issue we are discussing is about reason why the founder of the muslim2dhimmies bridge cut head of his wife. The options are 1 It was a drinking rage ... but muslims don't drink; 2 the  "honour" killings are limited to pakistan national custom ... may be but we see the same happening elsewhere else; 3 because he is muslim ...  statistics of the global frequency  distribution of the "honour" killings confirm that.

I know that officially muslim leaders condemn the practice but why so many devoted muslims ignore their leaders?

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 20^th, 2009 at 8:13am:

Honour killing has nothing to do with Islam, even if 100% of cases were by Muslims.

You are truly delusional and an out-right liar.

Quote:

The options are 1 It was a drinking rage ... but muslims don't drink; 2 the  "honour" killings are limited to pakistan national custom ... may be but we see the same happening elsewhere else; 3 because he is muslim ...  statistics of the global frequency  distribution of the "honour" killings confirm that.

Or 4. he was just a nutcase, like when any Western kills his wife.

Honour killing has nothing to do with Islam, even if 100% of cases were by Muslims.

Except for things like death for apostasy, death for cheating etc, right Abu? Why is it that you think this guy is a nutcase, but you are not when you call for the stoning to death of apostates, blasphemers and straying child brides?

If someone burns a U.S flag in the U.S can the mob lynch him because they suspect he might be a traitor to his country? Would their murder of him have anything to do with America's death penalty for treason?

Deflect deflect deflect.

Answer the question for once, abu, you bloody pathetic coward.

Quote:

If someone burns a U.S flag in the U.S can the mob lynch him because they suspect he might be a traitor to his country?

No. A mate of mine did that while I was over there, to protest against them making it illegal to burn the flag. He singed his eyebrows. It was more a ball of flame than a regular flag burning. I don't know what they normally use, but you shouldn't use petrol.


Quote:

Would their murder of him have anything to do with America's death penalty for treason?

Abu, you actually support death for apostates, blasphemers, cheating wives etc, right? That is, you would consider such a death just?

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 21^st, 2009 at 8:55pm:

If someone burns a U.S flag in the U.S can the mob lynch him because they suspect he might be a traitor to his country? Would their murder of him have anything to do with America's death penalty for treason?

You are in sore need for someone to grab you by the scruff of the neck, shake you, slap you around and scream into your face from very close-up: 'wake up, snap out of it!!  And then hang you on a peg somewere miles away from this wrethed miserable nonsense that you have been sucking up for far too long.

What the hell is wrong with you?!!? What damned dehumanising, delusional  fog has taken possession of your faculties?!?

Quote:

Abu, you actually support death for apostates, blasphemers, cheating wives etc, right? That is, you would consider such a death just?

He never said that. All he said was that a beheading has nothing to do with being Muslim. Murder is murder. The motivation behind the murder is left for the courts to decide and it is wrong to assume "oh, that's how Muslims murder. Those damn dirty Muslims!"

That's how racism starts.

Quote:

He never said that.

Yes he did. Just not in this thread.


Quote:

Murder is murder.

Abu would like to see it become legal to stone people to death for things that are not even considered crimes now. He thinks the government should organise the stoning, truck in a load of suitably small stones (so the victim doesn't die and miss out on the prolonged suffering), then round up members of the public and get them to throw the stones. It would be a good occasion to socialise and maybe pick up a fourth wife.


Quote:

That's how racism starts.

It's got nothing to do with racism. I think abu is of Anglo decent. It's about ideology.

f/d - Women would probably not be permitted to a good old fashioned stoning. their husbands would have to give consent first. same as any outing.
A stoning may be a boysonly day out. Perhaps a religious duty, rather than a social outing.
Maybe sort of like a strip club for us westerners.

Maybe you're right sprint. I'll have to ask Abu about that. Maybe it becomes sort of like a sport, where the big men line up and see who can do the most damage to the little girl. You can imagine the Muslim men getting embarassed if they missed by a couple of meters or something like that, in front of all their mates. Then afterwards they can gather round the milk bar and recount how they gave that nasty bitch what she deserved.

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2009 at 10:58am:

Quote: Abu, you actually support death for apostates, blasphemers, cheating wives etc, right? That is, you would consider such a death just? He never said that. All he said was that a beheading has nothing to do with being Muslim. Murder is murder. The motivation behind the murder is left for the courts to decide and it is wrong to assume "oh, that's how Muslims murder. Those damn dirty Muslims!" That's how racism starts.

How is Islam a race, you muppet.

Quote:

How is Islam a race, you muppet.

How are Jews a race?

F/D - hahahhaha. I can see the utter humiliation of a muslim missing with a stone.

esp is the girl was buried to her waist in soil. A sitting target.

Quote:

abu_rashid wrote on Feb 18th, 2009, 9:48pm: Calanen, All the verses you pasted say hit, not cut, they don't appear to refer to beheading whatsoever. The other texts you've brought are not Islamic texts (ie. Qur'an or Sunnah) and have no authority in Islamic rulings and beliefs, as I'm sure you're aware. Stop the word games Abu. You know that smiting people's necks is not tapping them on the back of the head playing tag, and you know that beheading is considered the special holy way of killing peoplen in Islam, the way to kill Jews too. Stop the obfuscation.

There is that bit about beheading in the film "Fitna" where one of the hate crazy islamic preachers works a crowd of devoted muslims into murderous frenzy reciting koran and brandishing sword over his head. He talks about beheading of Jews.

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2009 at 2:51pm:

Quote: How is Islam a race, you muppet. How are Jews a race?

Islam is not a race and whether it is or it is not has nothing to do with Jews.

"I think that Abu does need to acknowledge that Islamist extremists, do indeed interpret koranic texts to justify their, not infrequent, beheadings, but I do not know that it is really fair to then extrapolate that, to include muslims who do not have their life influenced by extremist thinking.

This is where people like calanen and I part ways, in that I regard Islam, as having many negatives, but I regard muslims, as just normal people, who are badly misrepresented due to the horrible extremism of the zealots who claim to champion Islam, and all muslimhood.

I think Abu would probably know the statistics, but the numbers of muslims, who have never condoned, or given succour in any way, to extremism, would undoubtedly be the massive majority, and that is going to be well over a billion people.

So to vilify over a billion people, because you don't like their religion, and unfairly extrapolate a link to terrorism, because of it, is pretty dogmatic, and not something that people of good conscience would want to do.


He can maintain his campaign to try and let people know of the aspects of Islam he finds distasteful, but it should never spill over into wholesale denigration of the muslim people, because it just is not a fair thing to do." (c) mozzaok

mozza, Nick Berg was just like you only younger  :'(

abu, Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia was demonstrating for muslim terrorists not against them.

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.info/info/images_topics/Image/wilayat/banqladish/2009/qaza-09012009/banqladesh-qaza-09012009%20%282%29.JPG

http://www.hizb-ut-tahrir.info/info/images_topics/Image/wilayat/banqladish/2009/qaza-09012009/banqladesh-qaza-09012009%20%2810%29.JPG

Just look at these idiot's faces.

Quote:

Islam is not a race and whether it is or it is not has nothing to do with Jews.

Oh it has everything to do with Jews.

Jews are the pretencious assclowns who took hollow ground from The Muslims. On the basis they were God's chosen people, and simply declared that land as their's.

They take this "God's chosen people" pretty seriously and expect other countries to wage war on their behalf. Where as Muslims believe in submitting to God. Humility eludes The Jew.

Jews believe themselves to be a race, that's why they keep bringing up the holocaust, rather then the possibility that Hitler knew Judaism presented a great threat to his rule as they were just as batshit as he was...


Jews potray themselves as a religion, as a nationality, as a race. And nobody bats an eye. They commit atrocious acts, they have huge influence on many powerful nations, and they're are radical Zionists everywhere occupying more places in general then Muslim Jihadists.

And yet noone bat's an eye. Everyone just condemns The Muslims. Who, conviently enough, are the only people who standup against The Jews.

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 4:40pm:

[quote] The Muslims. Who, conviently enough, are the only people who standup against The Jews.

Muslims are against the Jews....and the Christians, the Hindus, Buddhists, Atheists, Agnostics....in fact, anyone who isn't a Muslim.

Not a history student are you Jim.

Jim, you forgot to mention that Jews eat babies, beat you at computer games and your girl friend run away with them. That is really bad, my sincere condolences.

Anyway back to topic.
Here is the beheading analyses by islamic rage boy

Pssst. careful, don't let the joos hear you. There'll be hell to pay if they find out you are against them. Look what happened to the muslims.
Keep your head down if you know what's good for you. Just keep playing with your willy, there's a good boy.i

Quote:

Muslims are against the Jews....and the Christians, the Hindus, Buddhists, Atheists, Agnostics....in fact, anyone who isn't a Muslim.

Just the jews.

It never occured to you that all the nations that The Muslims attack are related to the spreading of Zionism?

Do you really think that Mo Hassan "honourably" cut Aasiya's head off because she was related to the spreading of Zionism?  :o

Would you do the same if you find your girl in bed with a Zionist?  :(

Quote:

Would you do the same if you find your girl in bed with a Zionist?  :(

Yes, there is no doubt in my mind the only way my Julz would ever cheat on me was do to Jew's jedi mind tricks.. ::)


But think about it. You give billions of dollars to Isral, your military assists them in killing Muslims, you welcome Jews with open arms, and since you're predominately Christian, and we all know Christianity is just a bad fanfic of Judaism...

Hurpdurp! That makes you Jewish advocates!

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 6:13pm:

Quote: Muslims are against the Jews....and the Christians, the Hindus, Buddhists, Atheists, Agnostics....in fact, anyone who isn't a Muslim. Just the jews. It never occured to you that all the nations that The Muslims attack are related to the spreading of Zionism?

No.

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 6:35pm:

Quote: Would you do the same if you find your girl in bed with a Zionist?  :( Yes, there is no doubt in my mind the only way my Julz would ever cheat on me was do to Jew's jedi mind tricks.. ::) ...

Would you use time  'honoured' traditional muslim beheading or shooting?

Quote:

Would you use time  'honoured' traditional muslim beheading or shooting?

Hey, wasn't it you guys who invented the machete?

That's a perfect beheading weapon if I ever saw one.

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 7:34pm:

Quote: Would you use time  'honoured' traditional muslim beheading or shooting? Hey, wasn't it you guys who invented the machete? That's a perfect beheading weapon if I ever saw one.

So would you use machete or a gun to kill your girl for helping to spread Zionism?

Quote:

So would you use machete or a gun to kill your girl for helping to spread Zionism?

No. I was under the impression you said if she cheated on me for a Zionist.

If she spread zionism I'd punish her by with-holding sex. It'd be a battle of wills.

I'm pretty darn lazy, I can go without physical extersion for a very long time. Hell, I'm too lazy to masturbate.

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 7:51pm:

Quote: So would you use machete or a gun to kill your girl for helping to spread Zionism? No. I was under the impression you said if she cheated on me for a Zionist. If she spread zionism I'd punish her by with-holding sex. It'd be a battle of wills. I'm pretty darn lazy, I can go without physical extersion for a very long time. Hell, I'm too lazy to masturbate.

Of course she does, sunshine. What do you think happens after a girl and a Zionist share the bed? Another Zionist that's what, may be even quadruple.

So would you behead her muslim way or shoot?

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 7:51pm:

Quote: So would you use machete or a gun to kill your girl for helping to spread Zionism? No. I was under the impression you said if she cheated on me for a Zionist. If she spread zionism I'd punish her by with-holding sex. It'd be a battle of wills. I'm pretty darn lazy, I can go without physical extersion for a very long time. Hell, I'm too lazy to masturbate.

Let me say this to you AGAIN, so it is very clear to you.

You dont have a girl. You chat with someone on the internetz, that you have never met. You cant have sex with her. You cant even kiss her. She is not your girlfriend.

Calanen wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 9:40pm:

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24th, 2009 at 7:51pm: Quote: So would you use machete or a gun to kill your girl for helping to spread Zionism? No. I was under the impression you said if she cheated on me for a Zionist. If she spread zionism I'd punish her by with-holding sex. It'd be a battle of wills. I'm pretty darn lazy, I can go without physical extersion for a very long time. Hell, I'm too lazy to masturbate. Let me say this to you AGAIN, so it is very clear to you. You dont have a girl. You chat with someone on the internetz, that you have never met. You cant have sex with her. You cant even kiss her. She is not your girlfriend.

Calanen, "honour" killings is about adherence to koranic attitude that are centuries old rather then about political reality of today. That is why muslims like abu who have anglo temperament are feeling ashamed about that and try to hide it under the rich tapestry of arabic language though they don't really understand and feel it as real arabs do.

Calanen wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 9:40pm:

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24th, 2009 at 7:51pm: Quote: So would you use machete or a gun to kill your girl for helping to spread Zionism? No. I was under the impression you said if she cheated on me for a Zionist. If she spread zionism I'd punish her by with-holding sex. It'd be a battle of wills. I'm pretty darn lazy, I can go without physical extersion for a very long time. Hell, I'm too lazy to masturbate. Let me say this to you AGAIN, so it is very clear to you. You dont have a girl. You chat with someone on the internetz, that you have never met. You cant have sex with her. You cant even kiss her. She is not your girlfriend.

And your NOT A LAWYER, YOUR A LOSER! :D

Quote:

Calanen, "honour" killings is about adherence to koranic attitude that are centuries old rather then about political reality of today. That is why muslims like abu who have anglo temperament are feeling ashamed about that and try to hide it under the rich tapestry of arabic language though they don't really understand and feel it as real arabs do.

Didn't have to wait long for an example  ;)

Oz Politics: Trolls trolling trolls

Lestat wrote on Feb 24^th, 2009 at 10:47pm:

Calanen wrote on Feb 24th, 2009 at 9:40pm: Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24th, 2009 at 7:51pm: Quote: So would you use machete or a gun to kill your girl for helping to spread Zionism? No. I was under the impression you said if she cheated on me for a Zionist. If she spread zionism I'd punish her by with-holding sex. It'd be a battle of wills. I'm pretty darn lazy, I can go without physical extersion for a very long time. Hell, I'm too lazy to masturbate. Let me say this to you AGAIN, so it is very clear to you. You dont have a girl. You chat with someone on the internetz, that you have never met. You cant have sex with her. You cant even kiss her. She is not your girlfriend. And your NOT A LAWYER, YOUR A LOSER! :D

It's 'you're' as in you are.

English is your second language, so you I can understand why you would have trouble. You might want to enroll in an evening class.

Christ, sure are alot of grammar nazis in here.

I don't think you aussies have any room to talk about spelling errors considering you can't even pronounce "danger" correctly.

Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 7:33am:

Lestat wrote on Feb 24th, 2009 at 10:47pm: Calanen wrote on Feb 24th, 2009 at 9:40pm: Jim Profit wrote on Feb 24th, 2009 at 7:51pm: Quote: So would you use machete or a gun to kill your girl for helping to spread Zionism? No. I was under the impression you said if she cheated on me for a Zionist. If she spread zionism I'd punish her by with-holding sex. It'd be a battle of wills. I'm pretty darn lazy, I can go without physical extersion for a very long time. Hell, I'm too lazy to masturbate. Let me say this to you AGAIN, so it is very clear to you. You dont have a girl. You chat with someone on the internetz, that you have never met. You cant have sex with her. You cant even kiss her. She is not your girlfriend. And your NOT A LAWYER, YOUR A LOSER! :D It's 'you're' as in you are. English is your second language, so you I can understand why you would have trouble. You might want to enroll in an evening class.

HAHAHA...is that the best you can do.

Why don't you tell us all once again how your a hot shot lawyer. If it gives your pathetic existence some meaning then thats a good thing. Then again....only losers will brag about their occuaption on an internet forum.

Pity for you that your evident ignorance destroys any credibility you have.

:D

Jim Profit wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 8:20am:

Christ, sure are alot of grammar nazis in here. I don't think you aussies have any room to talk about spelling errors considering you can't even pronounce "danger" correctly.

hehe...its an act of desperation Jim. They have no other response so they have to resort to grammar. The irony is this tosser has been made to look foolish time and time again, and even though his own grammer is rather poor to say the least, there is so much more to laugh at him about, that I just don't even bother.

By the way Calanen, speaking of grammer...in your post aimed at Jim....'dont' actually has an apostrophe. It is 'don't'....haha, being a lawyer and all I would of thought your grammer wouldn't be so poor.

You know...people in glass houses....

:D

Wow, lestat, you sure do like that little crazy moty. Kind of reflects who you are and the tone of your posts. No substance, just madness.

HAHAHA...is that the best you can do.


Quote:

Why don't you tell us all once again how your a hot shot lawyer.

Don't think I ever claimed to be a 'hot shot'. Maybe that's just your own idolization of me speaking. I don't claim to be a lawyer - I am a lawyer.  And if legal matters come up, I will give a legal opinion.

You for example, could, give an opinion on the best way to scrub toilets - and we would all defer to your experience.


Quote:

If it gives your pathetic existence some meaning then thats a good thing. Then again....only losers will brag about their occuaption on an internet forum.

If me saying what I do is enough to make you regret your own miserable existence, then mission accomplished. I'm not going to hide what I do because of your frail ego and childlike insecurities.


Quote:

Pity for you that your evident ignorance destroys any credibility you have. :D

You see, I don't need validation from you or the internet forum. Credibility for what?  Go on challenge me to a fight at Preston Mosque again. It will make you feel better.

Mo Hassan and muslim community


Quote:

Zarqa Abid, a soulful-sounding religious Muslim woman claimed that her cousin was once married to this same Hassan, and she denounced Hassan as a "monster." Abid also criticized the Islamic community for having refused to listen to her when she attempted to alert them to Hassan's criminal nature and deeds. Instead, they shunned her and continued to shower him with their money and to honor him.

tallow - not surprising the islamic society would refuse to listen to a woman and continue to revere the man she calls a "monster."

They will not change, even given this.
islams a dead dog.



calanen - good on you for making more of your work life than I have made of mine. Congrats.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 26^th, 2009 at 8:14am:

calanen - good on you for making more of your work life than I have made of mine. Congrats.

Thanks.  Truth is I'm a hard self marker, and I've done all sorts of things over time, only this more recently. People react very strangely when you tell them, make a lot of assumptions. But I cant tell them I do something else..because well I dont?

And I actually don't think its that impressive myself. They hand out law degrees like candy from all sorts of lowbrow institutions now. Probably even Lestat with his third grade English skills could get one from OPEN learning now.

What I actually do day to day might be (slightly on paper at least) more impressive, but I'm not going to tell these nutjobs on here what that is. Abu has already said he wants to put my personal details on muslim forum boards. The spectre of Islamic intimidation and menace is ever present for those who disagree with them.

Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:

Don't think I ever claimed to be a 'hot shot'. Maybe that's just your own idolization of me speaking. I don't claim to be a lawyer - I am a lawyer.

I don't think I have ever read anyone else here ever reveal their occupation or trade..except you. Then again, the rest of us don't need approval or 'respect' from a bunch of strangers on a message board.

The fact that you felt the need to tell us all that your a 'lawyer' in the first place is rather telling.


Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:

And if legal matters come up, I will give a legal opinion.

HAHAHA. I'd have to be very desperate to seek legal opinion from you. Given your rather evident poor debating skills, and your almost comical attempts to provide 'evidence' to support your ludicrous opinions...I suspect that those seeking legal opinion from you are the very desperate, or those who cannot afford any better. If you are a lawyer (and thats a big if) no doubt you would be bargain basement.

ffs...Abu has wiped the floor of you, and made you look stupid (though your to thick to realise it). I can only imagine what another experienced lawyer would do. :)


Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:

You for example, could, give an opinion on the best way to scrub toilets - and we would all defer to your experience.

wow...good one. Are you going to put that in your book.


Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:

If me saying what I do is enough to make you regret your own miserable existence, then mission accomplished. I'm not going to hide what I do because of your frail ego and childlike insecurities.

Unlike you, I'm very comfortable with my life, and don't need to share my occupation with strangers from the internet to give validation to my life (or opinions). You forget...thats you. Your the one telling us what you do like its supposed to change our opinions..not me.

Its not about you hiding what you do...you've announced it at every opportune moment. Like being a lawyer is supposed to validate your pathetic opinions. Unfortunately for you....your posts and your regular ridiculous and erroneous claims continuously make your 'lawyer' claims look dubious to say the least.

Like really....I didn't realise that lawyers could be so dumb.



Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:

You see, I don't need validation from you or the internet forum. Credibility for what?

haha...but thats just it. By bragging about being a lawyer (cause thats exactly what you are doing...not sure why though, cause really, its not much to brag about) and telling us that your 'writing a book' (how funny is that)...that is exactly what you doing...seeking validation from strangers on an internet forum. Really...its quite pathetic. I'm not sure whether to laugh at you or pity you.


Calanen wrote on Feb 25^th, 2009 at 2:14pm:

Go on challenge me to a fight at Preston Mosque again. It will make you feel better.

I never challenged you to a fight. Seems your adding 'liar' as well as 'ignorant' to your portfolio.

I challenged you to a debate, in person. I suspect that in person you would be a coward. That it is much easier for you to spread your lies on a forum, but in person you'd melt butter, I suspected you were a coward, and you have confirmed it. Is yellow your favorite colour?

Why would I want to fight you. Why would I care. Your irrelevent...quite frankly not even worth the waste of effort or time.

Calanen wrote on Feb 26^th, 2009 at 4:43pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 26th, 2009 at 8:14am: calanen - good on you for making more of your work life than I have made of mine. Congrats. Thanks.  Truth is I'm a hard self marker, and I've done all sorts of things over time, only this more recently. People react very strangely when you tell them, make a lot of assumptions. But I cant tell them I do something else..because well I dont? And I actually don't think its that impressive myself. They hand out law degrees like candy from all sorts of lowbrow institutions now. Probably even Lestat with his third grade English skills could get one from OPEN learning now. What I actually do day to day might be (slightly on paper at least) more impressive, but I'm not going to tell these nutjobs on here what that is. Abu has already said he wants to put my personal details on muslim forum boards. The spectre of Islamic intimidation and menace is ever present for those who disagree with them.

hahah...their you go, seeking validation from internet strangers, and in this case receiving it from Sprint (who is an even bigger loser then you)...and thanking him for it.

Aww..how cute. Does it make you feel better? Has this given your pathetic existence some meaning...just a little?

Does it make it all feel worth while?

:D:D:D:D

I wonder if muslims feel good when they do "honour" killings?

Calanen wrote on Feb 26^th, 2009 at 4:43pm:

Thanks.  Truth is I'm a hard self marker, and I've done all sorts of things over time, only this more recently. People react very strangely when you tell them, make a lot of assumptions. But I cant tell them I do something else..because well I dont? And I actually don't think its that impressive myself. They hand out law degrees like candy from all sorts of lowbrow institutions now. Probably even Lestat with his third grade English skills could get one from OPEN learning now.

This coming from the bloke that doesn't realise that 'don't' has an apostrophe. :D

But I do see your point...if someone with such poor grammar skills as yourself could become a lawyer then I guess anyone can.

More reason to wonder why you announce it to strangers like its something to be proud of.

tallowood wrote on Feb 27^th, 2009 at 8:52am:

I wonder if muslims feel good when they do "honour" killings?

I wonder if Tallowood feels good when the mental institution he resides in gives him access to a computer for a couple of hours.

:)

Lestat wrote on Feb 27^th, 2009 at 8:58am:

tallowood wrote on Feb 27th, 2009 at 8:52am: I wonder if muslims feel good when they do "honour" killings? I wonder if Tallowood feels good when the mental institution he resides him give him access to a computer for a couple of hours. :)

I feel good when islamic terrorists get their sorry asses kicked. How about you? Do you feel good when your brothers do "honour" killings?

"I'm sure you can appreciate the difference between doctrine and practise." (c) abu

"Beheading is a method of killing. It's irrelevant. ... Method of killing is a minor detail. It's got nothing to do with the Qur'an, as I mentioned above it's hardly if ever mentioned in the Qur'an at all." (c) abu


Interesting, abu admits that beheading is mentioned in koran.
It also seems that abu suggests to leave koran, (may be in libraries in fiction section), but to purge his numerous brothers who use the methods of "honour" killing.  :o

abu, what is the best method to do that?