| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Fringe >> environment discussion is a sham http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1234657977 Message started by tallowood on Feb 15th, 2009 at 10:32am |
|
|
Title: environment discussion is a sham Post by tallowood on Feb 15th, 2009 at 10:32am
If you think that so called environmentalists care about environment think twice before believing them.
They tell lies and when confronted with facts are trying their hardest to shut up their opponents by coming up with flimsy excuses to delete the opponents posts and/ or locking/deleting the whole threads. In reality they only care about redirecting flow of public money to support their ideology and creating well paid jobs for themselves out of taxpayer's pocket. |
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by freediver on Feb 15th, 2009 at 10:20pm
Shouldn't this go in the fringe board?
|
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by tallowood on Apr 23rd, 2010 at 7:58pm freediver wrote on Feb 15th, 2009 at 10:20pm:
Well, since it is here where environmental concerns belong let me ask a question about Icelandic volcano eruption. How does its environmental effects compare with effects of human activities? |
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by soren on Apr 23rd, 2010 at 8:43pm
Concern for society and nature are important and excellent qualities. Because of their importance, there are many charlatans who are strutting the stage pretending to be partisans of these cares. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, many of the 'bolshevics' of the spirit have sought refuge in the 'environmental movement'. Their aim of societal make-over is now channeled through the seemingly non-partisan regiter of 'environmental conservation'. Yet for many of these peopel societal conservation is anathema. In other words, for them conservationism is both good (four legs) and bad (two legs).
|
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by tallowood on Apr 26th, 2010 at 8:54pm
It is interesting to note the deafening silence of human fault proponents about Icelandic volcano influence on climate changes.
|
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by muso on Apr 28th, 2010 at 2:41pm tallowood wrote on Apr 26th, 2010 at 8:54pm:
No discernable effect, Tallowood. It's tiny in comparison to Mt Pinatubo, which released 15-30 million tonnes of sulphur dioxide. Here's a write-up: http://www.abc.net.au/environment/articles/2010/04/16//2874939.htm - and a very nice picture showing the Aurora Borealis and Mt Eyjafjallajökull. volcano_2.jpg (44 KB | 45
) |
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by Grendel on Apr 28th, 2010 at 2:45pm
has it stopped erupting yet?
|
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by muso on Apr 28th, 2010 at 4:26pm
No. It will probably have eruptions way into the future. It's an active volcano after all, but will it cause a slight blip on the temperature record like Pinatubo in the next decade? Unlikely.
|
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by tallowood on May 1st, 2010 at 6:52pm muso wrote on Apr 28th, 2010 at 2:41pm:
I didn't know that Mt Pinatubo was a human fault as well thanks for the enlightenment and the insight into inner workings of environmentalist mind, and a very nice picture showing the Aurora Borealis and Mt Eyjafjallajökull. :) |
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by muso on May 2nd, 2010 at 9:20am tallowood wrote on May 1st, 2010 at 6:52pm:
Say what? Did I say it was a human fault? It's the SO2 that causes the temporary cooling effect - that's all. I was just comparing Eyjafjallajökull to Mt Pinatubo in terms of magnitude. The former blasted ash up to 3km high. The latter 34 km high. |
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by tallowood on May 8th, 2010 at 9:21pm
Well if you use usual pollution per capita thing Islanders are very dirty nation, aren't they?
|
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by muso on May 14th, 2010 at 9:46pm
Thinking back to my student days, yes they can be dirty ;)
Hmmm I wonder what Katrin ended up doing with her life. |
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by Soren on May 14th, 2010 at 9:56pm muso wrote on May 14th, 2010 at 9:46pm:
She has broken free and has been working for Viscount Monckton of Brenchley. Sensible girl. :'( :'( :'( |
|
Title: Re: environment discussion is a sham Post by freediver on May 23rd, 2026 at 11:04am
This Topic was moved here from Fringe by freediver.
|
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |