"Since after all Islam is such a violent ideology and all, then I guess Muslim countries must have high instances of assaults (yeh we know, they don't get reported blah blah blah)."

Not only that but they also try to stop any criticism of their disgusting ideology by anybody else like in example of oic in UN and deceitfull moderator abu in islam forum.

Quote:

Not only that but they also try to stop any criticism of their disgusting ideology by anybody else like in example of oic in UN and deceitfull moderator abu in islam forum.

They don't mind criticizing everyone else though.

tallo- what's this thread all about? finding it hard to make any sense of it

Swathe wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 10:54am:

Quote: Not only that but they also try to stop any criticism of their disgusting ideology by anybody else like in example of oic in UN and deceitfull moderator abu in islam forum. They don't mind criticizing everyone else though.

The same can be said about you.

ROTFLMAO

SO Calanen's point was wrong?

What other group sets fire to embassies due to a satirical cartoon in a newspaper.  Puts out verbal decrees re killing someone because the didn't like the fiction he wrote?

Etc, etc, etc...

Lestat wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 11:25am:

Swathe wrote on Jan 29th, 2009 at 10:54am: Quote: Not only that but they also try to stop any criticism of their disgusting ideology by anybody else like in example of oic in UN and deceitfull moderator abu in islam forum. They don't mind criticizing everyone else though. The same can be said about you.

I disagree with some peoples opinion and I try to debate in a civil manner. I can see it is being wasted.

Swathe wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:19pm:

Lestat wrote on Jan 29th, 2009 at 11:25am: Swathe wrote on Jan 29th, 2009 at 10:54am: Quote: Not only that but they also try to stop any criticism of their disgusting ideology by anybody else like in example of oic in UN and deceitfull moderator abu in islam forum. They don't mind criticizing everyone else though. The same can be said about you. I disagree with some peoples opinion and I try to debate in a civil manner. I can see it is being wasted.

Not at all...I just find it amusing that you attack muslims for 'criticizing others' when you do likewise.

Like you said..whats wrong with disagreeing with others opinions. Do you not believe that muslims have the same right as you do?

So why the criticism?

More unanswered questions.  ::) ::) ::)

Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:10pm:

ROTFLMAO SO Calanen's point was wrong? What other group sets fire to embassies due to a satirical cartoon in a newspaper.  Puts out verbal decrees re killing someone because the didn't like the fiction he wrote? Etc, etc, etc...

Umm, Calanen? you sure about that. :D

I've already stated that this sort of behaviour is silly.

ironic though, given that your fellow 'assies' just advocated jailing someone for burning a piece of cloth.

I criticize the manner in which they go about it when they use less than diplomatic means. I don't deny anyone the right to their own opinion, in most cases however it would appear that I am more willing to listen to others than them to me. That's fine however. My opinions do not requires others to other to believe in them.

Oh dear... wrong name...  seems you still knew whom I meant.  :D

We can all see your attitude to "assies" Les...  you display it in every post.

Why don't you leave Australia?
You can bet you won't be missed.  

Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:27pm:

More unanswered questions.  ::) ::) ::)

I was responding to this statement from Swath.

"I disagree with some peoples opinion and I try to debate in a civil manner. I can see it is being wasted. "

Now....I know that even you might even be able to understand the concept of a question.

Now do you think that Swath's statement above was a question?

Ahh...boofy, you are very entertaining...I'll give you that much.

Swathe wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:29pm:

I criticize the manner in which they go about it when they use less than diplomatic means. I don't deny anyone the right to their own opinion, in most cases however it would appear that I am more willing to listen to others than them to me. That's fine however. My opinions do not requires others to other to believe in them.

Fair enough..but sorry, your post which I originally replied to did not state this.

It appeared to me that you were attacking muslims for criticizing others.

Something which you, and many others do as well. Just seemed to come across as a bit hypocritical.

Strawman from the idiot Muslim...  I asked the question.

You people are such liars.

Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:31pm:

Oh dear... wrong name...  seems you still knew whom I meant.  :D We can all see your attitude to "assies" Les...  you display it in every post. Why don't you leave Australia? You can bet you won't be missed.

yeah...your right, I'm used to how your slow mind works boofy. Sorry for highlighting yet another error in your post.

Leave and go where? I was born here. And what about my anglo saxon Australian wife? Should she leave as well?

Whats my attitude to 'aussies' grendel. My wife is an 'aussie', my kids an 'aussie', even I am an 'aussie'.

I have no problems with Aussies, in fact, I have family, and most of my best friiends are aussies.

But they, don't let the truth get in the way of your biggoted rants.

Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:34pm:

Strawman from the idiot Muslim...  I asked the question. You people are such liars.

Ahh...I see your struggling once again boofy and now resorting to insult.

Only liar here is you, which has been shown time and time again.

What question did you ask again?

Ho hum...

There were 2 actually and since you've shown you knew who i meant you have no excuse for your behaviour.



Quote:

SO Calanen's point was wrong? What other group sets fire to embassies due to a satirical cartoon in a newspaper.  Puts out verbal decrees re killing someone because the didn't like the fiction he wrote?

Oh and since there was only 1 page, I'd have thought they wouldn't have been too hard to find.

Too easy Pinocchio.
Hows that nose goin?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 7:04pm:

Ho hum... There were 2 actually and since you've shown you knew who i meant you have no excuse for your behaviour. Quote: SO Calanen's point was wrong? What other group sets fire to embassies due to a satirical cartoon in a newspaper.  Puts out verbal decrees re killing someone because the didn't like the fiction he wrote? Oh and since there was only 1 page, I'd have thought they wouldn't have been too hard to find. Too easy Pinocchio. Hows that nose goin?  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

As per usual they were stupid questions...alas, its what we've come to expect from you.

1)Go read the thread again, I never said it was wrong, I said that it was hypocritical, as it came across as he attacking muslims for what he does himself, that is, criticizing others.

2)Do you mean other 'protesters' which revert to violence, or did you word the question in order to only have one answer.

When it comes to violence, well actually plenty, or have you already forgotten the S11 protests where protesters attacked buildings and cops. Or abortion clinics in America, which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups.

Even your own loving Christians burnt down cinema's when the Passion of Christ was showing....

How bout you start practising your own faith..how does it go....he who is without sin?

To easy boofy...there you go, I answered your questions, rather easily..now I look forward to you repeatingly asking me to answer your questions time and time again to disguise your ignorance.

Oh...and your token ROTLMAO which will just confirm to us all that your struggling for a response. :)

Quote:

Go read the thread again, I never said it was wrong, I said that it was hypocritical

So you don't have a problem with hypocrisy?


Quote:

which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups

How often is 'regularly'?

I gather they are stupid questions because they point to the hypocrisy and the intolerance of Islam personified in you.   ::)

freediver wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 8:16pm:

Quote: Go read the thread again, I never said it was wrong, I said that it was hypocritical So you don't have a problem with hypocrisy?

Go read my post again again simple boy...Swaths post, and then mine which I was responding... this time try a little slower, then you might even be able to figure it out, with a bit of luck.

If your still struggling, then perhaps put it in your wiki..someone might explain it for you.


Quote:

How often is 'regularly'?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-related_violence

Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 8:19pm:

I gather they are stupid questions because they point to the hypocrisy and the intolerance of Islam personified in you.   ::)

Actually they point out your hypocricy boofy but you don't have the ability or the capabilities to realise it.

Thats what makes you so entertaining. :D

you are your worst enemy, and the beauty of it is, you don't even know it.

Its really is amusing. :D

yawn...

seems to me I'm the one eating the popcorn Les.

Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 8:34pm:

yawn... seems to me I'm the one eating the popcorn Les.

Of course it does boofy...of course. :)

cut it out with the boofy and the idiot etc etc

But he is an idiot gaybriel...  whereas I'm not boofy.  :)

Gaybriel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 11:12am:

tallo- what's this thread all about? finding it hard to make any sense of it

I was replying to abu's intro in "Assaults per capita".

Is it really hard to understand?

maybe link it next time tallo

Gaybriel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 9:49pm:

maybe link it next time tallo

The title of the thread explains it as good as a link, IMHO.

Lestat wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 8:31pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 29th, 2009 at 8:16pm: Quote: Go read the thread again, I never said it was wrong, I said that it was hypocritical So you don't have a problem with hypocrisy? Go read my post again again simple boy...Swaths post, and then mine which I was responding... this time try a little slower, then you might even be able to figure it out, with a bit of luck. If your still struggling, then perhaps put it in your wiki..someone might explain it for you. [quote]How often is 'regularly'?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-related_violence[/quote]

So when you said that US clinics "are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups", you actually meant that they have never been firebombed by Christian groups?

freediver wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 10:04pm:

Lestat wrote on Jan 29th, 2009 at 8:31pm: freediver wrote on Jan 29th, 2009 at 8:16pm: Quote: Go read the thread again, I never said it was wrong, I said that it was hypocritical So you don't have a problem with hypocrisy? Go read my post again again simple boy...Swaths post, and then mine which I was responding... this time try a little slower, then you might even be able to figure it out, with a bit of luck. If your still struggling, then perhaps put it in your wiki..someone might explain it for you. [quote]How often is 'regularly'? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-related_violence

So when you said that US clinics "are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups", you actually meant that they have never been firebombed by Christian groups?[/quote]

Do you honestly believe this. Please...tell me you don't, no one could possibly be so stupid!

It is well known that most if not all pro-life groups in the west and Christian based.

You really do manage to make yourself look foolish rather consistently fd.

But hey...if you would like to believe that 'only muslims are violent'..then you do so. If it makes you feel more comfortable with your bigotted views, then thats fine. whatever works for you.

;D

Perhaps you'd like to provide some evidence to back up your claim, rather than linking to the first website you find without bothering to check whether it contradicts you?


Quote:

Or abortion clinics in America, which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups.

Or you could just retract the statement and stop digging yourself in deeper.

freediver wrote on Jan 30^th, 2009 at 11:33am:

;D Perhaps you'd like to provide some evidence to back up your claim, rather than linking to the first website you find without bothering to check whether it contradicts you? Quote: Or abortion clinics in America, which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups.

I did provide evidence...your just playing dumb in a desperate attempt to cling to your prejudices.

Or maybe you are really that stupid, and you do believe that anti-aboritionists are mainly made up of athiests, and pro-abortionists are pre-dominantly Catholics.

:D


freediver wrote on Jan 30^th, 2009 at 11:33am:

Or you could just retract the statement and stop digging yourself in deeper.

What statement. That Christian groups regularly fire bomb abortion clinics. That is a statement of fact..I have shown evidence of the regular attacks on abortion clinics...and anyone with half a brain knows that the majority (if not all) anti-abortion groups in the west are Christian based.

Of course, it appears that you 'in the other half'. :D

Its funny isn't it, that whenever any act of violence is committed in a 'muslim' country, it is muslims to blame, yet any act of violence committed in a Christian country, then all of a sudden, this demand for 'evidence'. And yet when evidence is provided...you still refuse to see whats before your very eyes.

Thats ok FD...abortion clinics aren't bombed by Christians...actually, they're muslims. Thats it...they must be muslims.

What a tool you are :D

http://atheism.about.com/b/2007/04/27/christian-terrorists-leave-ied-outside-abortion-clinic.htm

http://www.publiceye.org/rightist/salvi.html

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3944/is_200104/ai_n8951397

http://www.albionmonitor.com/9702a/97abortionattack.html

There you go freediver....back to you. :)

Quote:

I did provide evidence...your just playing dumb in a desperate attempt to cling to your prejudices.

But the link you gave directly contradicted you. And you still consider it evidence? I guess it is in a sense.


Quote:

Or maybe you are really that stupid, and you do believe that anti-aboritionists are mainly made up of athiests, and pro-abortionists are pre-dominantly Catholics.

I just want you to back up that claim you made, that's all. Or at least try and fail, which seems to be the case here.


Quote:

What statement.

The one I conveniently quoted for you immediately above that request. The one I have repeatedly asked you to back up. Here it is yet again:


Quote:

Or abortion clinics in America, which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups.

Quote:

And yet when evidence is provided...you still refuse to see whats before your very eyes.

No Lestat, that is you. Your 'evidence' directly contradicts your claim. Rather than copying in the first links that google gives you, maybe you should actually peruse them to see if they contain any avidence that supports your claim. Otherwise it will become obvious that you don't even read the links you provide for other people and they won't bother taking any links you give seriously.

freediver wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 10:00am:

But the link you gave directly contradicted you. And you still consider it evidence? I guess it is in a sense.

How did it contradict what I was saying? Do you often talk rubbish without anything to back it up.


freediver wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 10:00am:

I just want you to back up that claim you made, that's all. Or at least try and fail, which seems to be the case here.

I did back it up..it just seems your to dumb to realise it.


freediver wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 10:00am:

The one I conveniently quoted for you immediately above that request. The one I have repeatedly asked you to back up. Here it is yet again: Quote: Or abortion clinics in America, which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups. [quote]And yet when evidence is provided...you still refuse to see whats before your very eyes.

No Lestat, that is you. Your 'evidence' directly contradicts your claim. Rather than copying in the first links that google gives you, maybe you should actually peruse them to see if they contain any avidence that supports your claim. Otherwise it will become obvious that you don't even read the links you provide for other people and they won't bother taking any links you give seriously.[/quote]

Once again..how does it contradict my claim???

Quote:

How did it contradict what I was saying?

It's your link. I don't see why I should have to explain what it says to you. You said that abortion clinics in America are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups. To back it up, you gave a link which listed known attacks on abortion doctors etc, that did not provide a single example of what you claim occurs often. If it did back uop your claim, you would have copied and pasted examples of Christian groups firebombing abortion clinics. But you can't can you? Even though you claim it happens often, you can't give one example.

freediver wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 12:05pm:

Quote: How did it contradict what I was saying? It's your link. I don't see why I should have to explain what it says to you. You said that abortion clinics in America are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups. To back it up, you gave a link which listed known attacks on abortion doctors etc, that did not provide a single example of what you claim occurs often. If it did back uop your claim, you would have copied and pasted examples of Christian groups firebombing abortion clinics. But you can't can you? Even though you claim it happens often, you can't give one example.

REally. Go read the article again Freediver. It seems it is you that should read the link. Here you go...

"According to NAF, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, property crimes committed against abortion providers have included 41 bombings, 173 arsons, 91 attempted bombings or arsons, 619 bomb threats, 1630 incidents of trespassing, 1264 incidents of vandalism, and 100 attacks with butyric acid ("stink bombs").[7] The first clinic arson occurred in Oregon in March 1976 and the first bombing occurred in February 1978 in Ohio.[12] More recent incidents have included:[4]

December 25, 1984: An abortion clinic and two physicians' offices in Pensacola, Florida were bombed in the early morning of Christmas Day by a quartet of young people (Matt Goldsby, Jimmy Simmons, Kathy Simmons, Kaye Wiggins) who later called the bombings "a gift to Jesus on his birthday."[13] "

Here you go. Here is the 'one' case you asked for..from the very same source I provided to you above. Clearly it states that the 'clinic was bombed'...and just in case your to dumb to notice 'a gift to jesus on his birthday' I'm sure even you would concede is evidence that it was Christians that did the bombing.


And why didn't you back up your claims and explain how my link contradicted my claim? Cause you cant explain it because thier is no contradiction. Pretty poor effort Freediver. You asked for evidence, I provided it, and now you are claiming that my link contradicts my first statement.

I ask you to highlight those contradictions, and you cannot.

I provided many examples of Christians attacking abortion clinics...yet in your stubborness you claim that this is not evidence, and make outlandish claims that you once again, cant back up.

So where's the contradiction? Will you admit now you were wrong. I doubt it.

ROTFLMAO

You are kidding right.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Grendel wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 12:27pm:

ROTFLMAO You are kidding right. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Anything more to add. Oh right, don't bother...with you, this is as good as it gets.

"December 25, 1984: An abortion clinic and two physicians' offices in Pensacola, Florida were bombed in the early morning of Christmas Day by a quartet of young people (Matt Goldsby, Jimmy Simmons, Kathy Simmons, Kaye Wiggins) who later called the bombings "a gift to Jesus on his birthday."[13] "

What...are you denying that this is an example of Christians bombing an abortion clinic?

Probably...you are that dumb it wouldn't surprise me.

Well what is the point you are trying to make?

4 people are representative of all Christians?
All Christians bomb abortion clinics?
All Christians are anti-abortion?
Christians don't have abortions?
Christians support killing abortionists?

Just what is your point?  I mean apart from the one atop your head.

In a Christian society these murderers/terrorists would be arrested and gaoled.

Bit different to what happens to Muslim terrorists in muslim societies eh.

Grendel wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 12:39pm:

Well what is the point you are trying to make? 4 people are representative of all Christians? All Christians bomb abortion clinics? All Christians are anti-abortion? Christians don't have abortions? Christians support killing abortionists? Just what is your point/  I mean apart from the one atop your head.

Actually..I suggest you click on the links I provided. There are plenty of examples.

Freediver asked for one.

You gonna answer my question for once?

Grendel wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 12:43pm:

You gonna answer my question for once?

Perhaps when you ask a relevant question. Not the usual rubbish you come up with.

You want to know my point? Go and read the thread dumbo, and you might be able to figure it out.

I understand that you are to simple to figure it out yourself and need it to be spelt out..but sorry..you are far to stupid for me to be able to help you out.

I gather that means no...

So you have no point.  ;D

Grendel wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 1:09pm:

I gather that means no... So you have no point.  ;D

Oh dear oh dear...this people is evidence of how dopey boofy really is.

He asks me a question, then when I answer him, he asks me 'what my point is.

I gave you the chance boofy, I told you to go back and read the thread, and then perhaps you'd figure out what my point is. Alas, you pea sized brain is still incapable of figuring it out,
despite the fact that it was your 'question' that I was originally responding too.

Anyway...it looks like I am going to have to dumb it down even further for you.

Here is your original question...just in case you've forgotten.



Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:10pm:

SO Calanen's point was wrong? ROTFLMAO What other group sets fire to embassies due to a satirical cartoon in a newspaper.  Puts out verbal decrees re killing someone because the didn't like the fiction he wrote? Etc, etc, etc...

If we ignore your token ROTFLMAO which is well known is your way of conceding defeat...you demanded that I answer these questions. Even though the questions were
rather stupid, I decided I would play along. Here is my response.


Lestat wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 7:44pm:

1)Go read the thread again, I never said it was wrong, I said that it was hypocritical, as it came across as he attacking muslims for what he does himself, that is, criticizing others. 2)Do you mean other 'protesters' which revert to violence, or did you word the question in order to only have one answer. When it comes to violence, well actually plenty, or have you already forgotten the S11 protests where protesters attacked buildings and cops. Or abortion clinics in America, which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups. Even your own loving Christians burnt down cinema's when the Passion of Christ was showing....

Now I know you really struggle with comprehension, so just in case you don't know, the sentence starting with 1) is the answer to your first question.
And the sentence starting with 2) is the answer to your own question.

Of course freediver then asked for evidence, and now that I've provided it seems that he's run away.

Anyway....now, rather amazingly...after demanding an answer to your stupid questions, when I provided an answer, you have the nerve to post the following.


Grendel wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 12:39pm:

Well what is the point you are trying to make?

I have to ask..do you have the memory span of a fly? The fact that you ask me what my point is, when I was actually directly answering your question, is really undisputable evidence of how dopey you really are.

Were you dropped as a baby?

Lestat wrote on Jan 31^st, 2009 at 12:20pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 31st, 2009 at 12:05pm: Quote: How did it contradict what I was saying? It's your link. I don't see why I should have to explain what it says to you. You said that abortion clinics in America are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups. To back it up, you gave a link which listed known attacks on abortion doctors etc, that did not provide a single example of what you claim occurs often. If it did back uop your claim, you would have copied and pasted examples of Christian groups firebombing abortion clinics. But you can't can you? Even though you claim it happens often, you can't give one example. REally. Go read the article again Freediver. It seems it is you that should read the link. Here you go... "According to NAF, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, property crimes committed against abortion providers have included 41 bombings, 173 arsons, 91 attempted bombings or arsons, 619 bomb threats, 1630 incidents of trespassing, 1264 incidents of vandalism, and 100 attacks with butyric acid ("stink bombs").[7] The first clinic arson occurred in Oregon in March 1976 and the first bombing occurred in February 1978 in Ohio.[12] More recent incidents have included:[4] December 25, 1984: An abortion clinic and two physicians' offices in Pensacola, Florida were bombed in the early morning of Christmas Day by a quartet of young people (Matt Goldsby, Jimmy Simmons, Kathy Simmons, Kaye Wiggins) who later called the bombings "a gift to Jesus on his birthday."[13] " Here you go. Here is the 'one' case you asked for..from the very same source I provided to you above. Clearly it states that the 'clinic was bombed'...and just in case your to dumb to notice 'a gift to jesus on his birthday' I'm sure even you would concede is evidence that it was Christians that did the bombing. And why didn't you back up your claims and explain how my link contradicted my claim? Cause you cant explain it because thier is no contradiction. Pretty poor effort Freediver. You asked for evidence, I provided it, and now you are claiming that my link contradicts my first statement. I ask you to highlight those contradictions, and you cannot. I provided many examples of Christians attacking abortion clinics...yet in your stubborness you claim that this is not evidence, and make outlandish claims that you once again, cant back up. So where's the contradiction? Will you admit now you were wrong. I doubt it.

Still waiting for you to highlight the contradictions Freediver. Who was  it who said this "that did not provide a single example of what you claim occurs often."

I do believe it was you. Like I said, obviously you didn't even read the link, cause I have shown you an example, and there are more.

Yet surprise surprise, you have run away. Whats wrong Freediver...aren't you man enough to admit you were wrong.

You made a claim, and once again, you have been unable or unwilling to back it up (contradictions)...and now you have shamefully run away.

Well...whats happened? Cat caught your tongue?

:D:D:D

ROTFLMAO...

ah hate to tell you Les, but I'm still waiting for an answer.  ::)

You know...  a real one one that explains your pov in relation to reality.

;D ;D ;D

Grendel wrote on Feb 1^st, 2009 at 7:24pm:

ROTFLMAO... ah hate to tell you Les, but I'm still waiting for an answer.  ::) You know...  a real one one that explains your pov in relation to reality. ;D ;D ;D

Even though I've shown quite clearly that I've answered your questions...this pathetic response is the best you can do.

Oh well..I guess even you can see how stupid you look so you desperately hanging on to whatever you can.

I've answered your questions boofy...its just a shame that your to slow to see it. Oh well.

Hate to tell you this Les, but that's not what you've shown at all.   ;D

Like I said...  apart from that upon your head...  you have no point.

Grendel wrote on Feb 1^st, 2009 at 8:00pm:

Hate to tell you this Les, but that's not what you've shown at all.   ;D Like I said...  apart from that upon your head...  you have no point.

try again boofy.


Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:10pm:

SO Calanen's point was wrong? ROTFLMAO What other group sets fire to embassies due to a satirical cartoon in a newspaper.  Puts out verbal decrees re killing someone because the didn't like the fiction he wrote? Etc, etc, etc...

If we ignore your token ROTFLMAO which is well known is your way of conceding defeat...you demanded that I answer these questions. Even though the questions were
rather stupid, I decided I would play along. Here is my response.


Lestat wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 7:44pm:

1)Go read the thread again, I never said it was wrong, I said that it was hypocritical, as it came across as he attacking muslims for what he does himself, that is, criticizing others. 2)Do you mean other 'protesters' which revert to violence, or did you word the question in order to only have one answer. When it comes to violence, well actually plenty, or have you already forgotten the S11 protests where protesters attacked buildings and cops. Or abortion clinics in America, which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups. Even your own loving Christians burnt down cinema's when the Passion of Christ was showing....

::)

Grendel wrote on Feb 1^st, 2009 at 8:32pm:

::)

Grendel wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 12:10pm:

SO Calanen's point was wrong? ROTFLMAO What other group sets fire to embassies due to a satirical cartoon in a newspaper.  Puts out verbal decrees re killing someone because the didn't like the fiction he wrote? Etc, etc, etc...

If we ignore your token ROTFLMAO which is well known is your way of conceding defeat...you demanded that I answer these questions. Even though the questions were
rather stupid, I decided I would play along. Here is my response.


Lestat wrote on Jan 29^th, 2009 at 7:44pm:

1)Go read the thread again, I never said it was wrong, I said that it was hypocritical, as it came across as he attacking muslims for what he does himself, that is, criticizing others. 2)Do you mean other 'protesters' which revert to violence, or did you word the question in order to only have one answer. When it comes to violence, well actually plenty, or have you already forgotten the S11 protests where protesters attacked buildings and cops. Or abortion clinics in America, which are regularly fire bombed by Christian groups. Even your own loving Christians burnt down cinema's when the Passion of Christ was showing....

::) ::)