this the muslims modus operandi.


"« McCain Defends Sarah PalinWashington D.C. Bus Ads Attack God »Gold’n Plump Submits to Islam
Here’s a tip for all you employers out there; insert a clause into your employees’ contracts that says they agree to immediate termination if they request prayer breaks or other special privileges based on the rantings of a false prophet!

Minnesota Plant That Fired Muslims for Taking Prayer Breaks Will Pay $365,000
Fox News

MINNEAPOLIS —  Under a settlement to a federal lawsuit, up to 100 Somali Muslims who are current or former workers at Gold’n Plump Inc. will receive a total of $365,000.

The settlement was filed in Minneapolis on Friday. It sprang from allegations of religious discrimination at the company’s chicken processing plants in Cold Spring and Arcadia, Wis.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed lawsuits against St. Cloud-based Gold’n Plump and the Work Connection Inc., an employment agency in St. Paul, which handled some hiring for the plant.

Under the settlement, Gold’n Plump agreed to pay $215,000 to workers who were terminated for taking prayer breaks.

The Work Connection will pay $150,000 to workers who were asked to sign a form acknowledging that they might be required to handle pork, which many Muslims consider unclean.

The EEOC estimates that 40 to 100 workers will qualify for the payment"

http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2008/11/11/goldn-plump-submits-to-islam/


keep in mind, it is 2 years in jail if you have a bible in saudi

They are rooting much else besides if Ayatollah Khomeini is to be believed. But luckily for shiites at least, there is a post-coital guidance available on good authority. You can't get more scholaarly than thee Ayatollah Khomeini.



Mark Steyn explains in THE SHAGGED SHEEP      
(Sunday, 30 November 2008  )
http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/1516/26

The naughty bit:

Quote:

Resaleh Towzih al-Masael/A Clarification Of Questions consists of almost 3,000 “problems” for which Ayatollah Khomeini provides answers, plus a few follow-ups he dealt with in subsequent editions. Here is a page from Mr Borujerdi’s translation. In case you’re on a slow dial-up in Mexico and the j-peg’s taking its time a-loading, I’ll reprint a bit: #2631. It is loathsome to eat the meat of horse and mule and donkey and if somebody makes coitus with them, that is an intercourse, they become unlawful and they must be taken out of the city and sold elsewhere. #2632. If they have intercourse with a cow and sheep and camel their urine and dung becomes unclean and drinking their milk will also be unlawful and they must be killed and burned without delay, and the person who had intercourse with them must pay money to the owner. Further, if he had intercourse with any beast its milk becomes unlawful. I first read this book all those years ago with my Persian gal, and I take it off the shelf every once in a while because, like Oriana, I enjoy a good laugh: If you bonk your mule, you’ve gotta take him out the city and sell him. If you shag your neighbor’s sheep, you’ve gotta write him a check. That’s not me, that’s not Oriana, that's not some compiler of some discredited anthology, that’s the Ayatollah Khomeini. You can find the great man's magnum opus in the original Farsi at imam-khomeini.com.

How can one take an angry, bearded shite seriously again, especially when he demands that infidel little me defer to the 'scholars'?  I know I won't be able to.

Soren - hahhaha, good bedtime r4eading - might lead to weird dreams !!!

Makes me think, how does he know so much about bestiality ?

Yes, it is madness, only religion can get away with demanding the ridiculous with impunity.

It is why atheists like myself say that religion demands rights which they expect society to accommodate.

If it was a slave labour camp at which they were forced to work, then they may have a case, but obviously it was not, they chose to work there, and then demanded that special considerations be made for them due to their specific religious delusions.

Religion sucks, and courts wrongly equating special privileges, as religious rights, is a good example of political correctness, or in this case, religious correctness, gone mad.

mozzaok wrote on Dec 4^th, 2008 at 8:43am:

Yes, it is madness, only religion can get away with demanding the ridiculous with impunity. It is why atheists like myself say that religion demands rights which they expect society to accommodate. If it was a slave labour camp at which they were forced to work, then they may have a case, but obviously it was not, they chose to work there, and then demanded that special considerations be made for them due to their specific religious delusions. Religion sucks, and courts wrongly equating special privileges, as religious rights, is a good example of political correctness, or in this case, religious correctness, gone mad.

Probably a bit more than just political correctness. There's some political wisdom in giving ground to a human need for which people are willing to live by, turn their vote for, die or (more ominously) kill.

So the moral imperative is to acquiesce to unfair demands for political expediency?

Mozzaok - once again I entirely agree with you.

mozzaok wrote on Dec 4^th, 2008 at 9:05am:

So the moral imperative is to acquiesce to unfair demands for political expediency?

Isn't acquiescence the beating heart of political survival? Lead when you can, accede when you must? Religion is an ancient response to a basic human need and every political system must compromise with it. Take the American ideal of separation of church and state... in all but practice. Imagine a US Presidential candidate declaring his atheism. Precious few elected officials admit to having no religious beliefs. And so much for banning it altogether to wipe it out. Even seconds after the collapse of Soviet communism, Russian Orthodoxy exploded back onto the scene like 70 years never happened. The Chinese are as religious today as they ever were under the Emperors. You can pass as many laws as you like. If they offend the religious, they will be ignored by them and they will become determined to remove from power those who uphold those laws.

Perhaps the UK should have been included in the original thread.



"Greenwood Junior School sent out a letter to parents saying the three-day festival of Eid al-Adha, which takes place between December 8 and 11, meant that Muslim children would be off school.

That meant planning for the traditional nativity play were shelved because the school felt it would be too difficult to run both celebrations side by side.

The move has left parents furious.

Janette Lynch, whose seven-year-old son Keanu attends the school, in Sneinton, Nottingham, said: "The head has a whole year to plan for Eid and so she should be able to plan for both religious festivals.

"I have never heard of this at a school. It is the first year my son has been there and a lot of the mums like me were really looking forward to seeing the children in the nativity."

She said a letter, sent from "The staff at Greenwood Junior School', said: "It is with much regret that we have had to cancel this year's Christmas performances. This is due to the Eid celebrations that take place next ........."

http://europenews.dk/en/node/16902

that's down to the school's poor management, not down to muslims

I don't see how the school has to do anything for the muslim kids anyway- theyre just having the three days off, so what does the school have to organise? not having them there?

The Islamic religion in its purest (political) form is totalitarian in nature and therefore anti democratic. We speak about the meaning of the word "moderate" in relation to Islam and find it as something no longer holding any meaning.


The reason for this is simple: many so-called "moderates" have been praised in the west, only later being found to have been supporting jihad against non-Muslims from the very
beginning.

The Muslims we look to with hope are the "modernists", who truly believe in liberal democracy such that Islam should be a matter of personal faith, not politics.

Those who refuse to condemn sharia (Islamic law) as being incompatible with modern day society, are the Muslims we take issue with. It is these Muslims who present a clear and present danger to the rest of society.

which in no way answers my question...

your question in no way addresses the topic.

Ever been involved with a school P and C committee ?

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 5^th, 2008 at 1:29am:

your question in no way addresses the topic. Ever been involved with a school P and C committee ?

it addresses the article you posted. if you didn't want the article discussed then why did you introduce it?

Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5^th, 2008 at 1:09am:

which in no way answers my question...

Here is the answer to your question
The school have to organise the traditional nativity play and shelved Eid al-Adha if they can't have both. They could've sent the muslim kids to muslim countries for Eid al-Adha as there is plenty of it there.

tallowood wrote on Dec 5^th, 2008 at 10:15am:

Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 1:09am: which in no way answers my question... Here is the answer to your question The school have to organise the traditional nativity play and shelved Eid al-Adha if they can't have both. They could've sent the muslim kids to muslim countries for Eid al-Adha as there is plenty of it there.

no that doesnt answer my question

because the school does not organise the festival for eid- it just means the muslim kids don't come to school.

Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5^th, 2008 at 10:24am:

tallowood wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 10:15am: Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 1:09am: which in no way answers my question... Here is the answer to your question The school have to organise the traditional nativity play and shelved Eid al-Adha if they can't have both. They could've sent the muslim kids to muslim countries for Eid al-Adha as there is plenty of it there. no that doesnt answer my question because the school does not organise the festival for eid- it just means the muslim kids don't come to school.

Yes it does "the muslim kids to muslim countries for Eid al-Adha as there is plenty of it there". Do you think that muslim countries don't have eid?

tallowood wrote on Dec 5^th, 2008 at 10:34am:

Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 10:24am: tallowood wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 10:15am: Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 1:09am: which in no way answers my question... Here is the answer to your question The school have to organise the traditional nativity play and shelved Eid al-Adha if they can't have both. They could've sent the muslim kids to muslim countries for Eid al-Adha as there is plenty of it there. no that doesnt answer my question because the school does not organise the festival for eid- it just means the muslim kids don't come to school. Yes it does "the muslim kids to muslim countries for Eid al-Adha as there is plenty of it there". Do you think that muslim countries don't have eid?

what?? my question was how this affects the schools, as they don't actually have to do anything. what question are you answering?

Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5^th, 2008 at 10:40am:

tallowood wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 10:34am: Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 10:24am: tallowood wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 10:15am: Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5th, 2008 at 1:09am: which in no way answers my question... Here is the answer to your question The school have to organise the traditional nativity play and shelved Eid al-Adha if they can't have both. They could've sent the muslim kids to muslim countries for Eid al-Adha as there is plenty of it there. no that doesnt answer my question because the school does not organise the festival for eid- it just means the muslim kids don't come to school. Yes it does "the muslim kids to muslim countries for Eid al-Adha as there is plenty of it there". Do you think that muslim countries don't have eid? what?? my question was how this affects the schools, as they don't actually have to do anything. what question are you answering?

Your question was "so what does the school have to organise? not having them there?"
I've answered your question if you don't like the answer it is not my problem. Now answer my question... "Do you think that muslim countries don't have eid?"

so you think the school's have to organise the muslim kids to go to muslim countries?

obviously they have eid. I don't get your point

Gaybriel wrote on Dec 5^th, 2008 at 11:04am:

so you think the school's have to organise the muslim kids to go to muslim countries? obviously they have eid. I don't get your point

I think that the school have to organise the traditional nativity play and shelved Eid al-Adha if they can't have both. The muslim kids can come to the traditional nativity play but nobody force them so if their parents don't like tradition of country they choose to come to they have an alternative.