From getup:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/green-tax-shift/climate-change-policy.html

Labor has to get in at the next election-Mnatra put this one up on Cracker thanks mantra-

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22651649-2703,00.html




 October 26, 2007 11:01am AEST
THE AUSTRALIAN

Election 2007
World's survival at risk: UN report Font Size: Decrease Increase Print Page: Print Lewis Smith | October 26, 2007
THE speed at which mankind has used the Earth's resources over the past 20 years has put "humanity's very survival" at risk, a study involving 1400 scientists has concluded.

Saying the scale of the challenge is huge, the scientists have told the United Nations that environmental problems must be treated as a top priority if they are to be solved.

The environmental audit for the UN found that each person in the world now requires a third more land to supply his or her needs than the Earth can supply.

Thirty per cent of amphibians, 23 per cent of mammals and 12 per cent of birds are under threat of extinction, while one in 10 of the world's major rivers runs dry every year before it reaches the sea.

The bleak verdict on the environment was issued as an "urgent call for action" by the UN Environment Program, which said that the "point of no return" was fast approaching.

Achim Steiner, the program’s executive director, said the international community's response to environmental issues was at times "courageous and inspiring", but all too often inadequate.

"The systematic destruction of the Earth's natural and nature-based resources has reached a point where the economic viability of economies is being challenged and where the bill we hand to our children may prove impossible to pay," he said.

The report was critical of the lack of action by governments across the world in protecting the environment from being degraded.


The response to climate change was described as "woefully inadequate" but it was only one of several major problems that needed to be addressed effectively. "We appear to be living in an era in which the severity of environmental problems is increasing faster than our policy responses," the report said.

"To avoid the threat of catastrophic consequences, we need new policy approaches to change the direction and magnitude of drivers of environmental change."

The report was drafted and researched by almost 400 scientists, all experts in their fields, whose findings were subjected to review by another 1000 of their peers.

Scientists conducting the review, 157 of whom were nominated by 48 governments, were split into groups of expertise for each of the 10 chapters of the report. Other experts were selected from more than 50 research centres in 47 countries.

Marion Cheatle, of the program, said damage sustained to the environment was of fundamental economic concern, and if unchecked would affect growth.

The report assessed the impact on the environment since 1987. Climate change was identified as one of the most pressing problems but the condition of fresh water supplies, agricultural land and biodiversity were considered to be of equal concern.

The Times

There is little difference between labour and liberal on their expected outcome to the environment.

from memory, libs expected to raise emissions by 20% BY 2020, ALp BY 18%.

So, no difference.
It'ld be nice if you put  up a balanced posting for a serious topic.

I got a postcard sized thing in the mail from getup. It had info about the targets as well. From memory only the democrats and greens had set enforceable targets for 2020 or 2050. I can't find it now and it's not on their website. It also had a column for family first, which did even worse than the coalition.