| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Relationships >> Which one- http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1188298371 Message started by oceansblue on Aug 28th, 2007 at 8:52pm |
|
|
Title: Which one- Post by oceansblue on Aug 28th, 2007 at 8:52pm
Which one does the most damage in a relationship?
Lies Infidelity Imbalance of power Lack of sexual compatibility Family problems ie: inlaws etc |
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by sprintcyclist on Aug 28th, 2007 at 10:59pm
The lack of sexual compatability.
The first 2 may be a problem if they are known, an imbalance of power may be entirely accepted. A marriage is a new family, that comes before inlaws. They are secondary |
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by cautious connie on Aug 29th, 2007 at 7:21am
I dont know- i agree they are all damaging. I would tend to think lies would be the worst because they mean you can't deal with a situation because you dont know what it is.
|
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by sprintcyclist on Aug 29th, 2007 at 9:38am
Connie, yes, only if the lie is known though.
If the fib never comes to the surface ......... no damage done. |
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by cautious connie on Aug 29th, 2007 at 10:22am
I disagree. A lie unknown still weighs on a relationship because it inhibits communication and knowledge between the partners.
|
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by sprintcyclist on Aug 29th, 2007 at 1:04pm
Oh, it's certainly not a good thing for a relationship.
We are talking about serious deliberate lies here, not just forgetful or "did not bother to say". I much rather be withsomeone who had lied and was sexually compatible, than someone who had never lied but we slept in different beds. |
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by oceansblue on Aug 29th, 2007 at 2:41pm
mmm lack of sexual compatability is a big one and my first choice.
and infidelity the next for me I think...this one and lies go together. |
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by cautious connie on Aug 29th, 2007 at 7:58pm
I suppose defining "damage" might help me answer the question too. You can have a long term stable relationship with someone whom you don't have a strong sexual compatability with. Is it as close as a relationship where there is sexual compatability- probably not, but life as a couple is not all sex.
|
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by mantra on Aug 30th, 2007 at 11:47am
I agree too Oceans & Sprintcyclist. All can be forgiven if you are compatible physically - for a little while anyway. :)
|
|
Title: Re: Which one- Post by oceansblue on Aug 30th, 2007 at 12:35pm cautious connie wrote on Aug 29th, 2007 at 7:58pm:
well then that would be a very unsatisfactory sterile realtionship-- how sad. A brother and sister can live together and not want sex- or an old couple perhaps-but normal couples do want sex- incompatibility would be a dealbreaker in most cases. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |